UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SPOKANE

Transcription

1 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // 0 THE HONORABLE STANLEY A. BASTIAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, VS. STERLING FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. AT SPOKANE No. :0cv00SAB CLASS ACTION LEAD PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEAL AND NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA TeephoneS/SSSSFaS/SSS

2 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // 0 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Lead Plaintiff City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on September, 0 (Dkt. No. ), order granting defendants' motion to dismiss on August, 0 (Dkt. No. ), and entry ofjudgment on September, 0 (Dkt. No. ). DATED: October, 0 DATED: October, 0 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD L SUNNY S. SARKIS MATTHEW S. MELAMED si ChristoDher P. Seefer One Montgomery Street Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: / / (fax) Lead Counsel for Plaintiff LUKINS & ANNIS MICHAEL J. HINES s/ Laura J. Black West Sprague Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA 0 Telephone: 0/ 0/ (fax) Liaison Counsel NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA TeephoneS/SSSSFaS/SSS

3 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // 0 VANOVERBEKE MICHAUD & TIMMONY, P.C. MICHAEL J. VANOVERBEKE THOMAS C. MICHAUD Alfred Street Detroit, MI 0 Telephone: /0 / (fax) Additional Counsel for Plaintiff RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT. Lead Plaintiff City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System is represented by the following counsel: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd L Susan K. Alexander Andrew S. Love Christopher P. Seefer Sunny S. Sarkis Matthew S. Melamed One Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: / Fax: / Lukins & Annis Michael J. Hines Laura J. Black West Sprague Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA 0 Telephone: 0/ Fax: 0/ NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA Telephone. / Fax. /

4 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // Vanoverbeke Michaud & Timmony, P.C. Michael J. Vanoverbeke Thomas C. Michaud Alfred Street Detroit, MI 0 Telephone: /0 Fax: / 0. Defendants Sterling Financial Corporation are represented by the following counsel: Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Barry M. Kaplan Gregory L. Watts John C. Roberts Jr. 0 Fifth Avenue, Suite 0 Seattle, WA 0 Telephone: 0/00 Fax: 0/ DATED: October, 0 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD L SUNNY S. SARKIS MATTHEW S. MELAMED si Christoi,her P. Seefer One Montgomery Street Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: / / (fax) Lead Counsel for Plaintiff NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA TeephoneS/SSSSFaS/SSS

5 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // 0 DATED: October, 0 LUKINS & ANNIS MICHAEL J. HINES si Laura J. Black West Sprague Avenue, Suite 00 Spokane, WA 0 Telephone: 0/ 0/ (fax) Liaison Counsel VANOVERBEKE MICHAUD & TIMMONY, P.C. MICHAEL J. VANOVERBEKE THOMAS C. MICHAUD Alfred Street Detroit, MI 0 Telephone: /0 / (fax) Additional Counsel for Plaintiff NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA Telephone. / Fax. /

6 Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // 0 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on October, 0, I authorized the electronic filing of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I caused to be mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the noncm/ecf participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October, 0. si ChristoDher P. Seefer ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD L One Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: / / (fax) chriss@rgrdlaw.com NINTH CIRCUIT RULE REPRESENTATION STATEMENT (:0cv00SAB) One Montgomery Street, Suite 00, San Francisco, CA Telephone. / Fax. /

7 CM/ECF LIVE U.S. District Court:waed Page of Case :0cv00SAB Document Filed // //0 Mailing Information for a Case :0cv00SAB City of Roseville Employees Retirement System v. Sterling Financial Corporation et al Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive notices for this case. Karl P Barth karlb@hbsslaw.com,dawn@hbsslaw.com,shelbys@hbsslaw.com Laura J Black lblack@lukins.com,jmacfarlane@lukins.com,ayates@lukins.com Brian Danitz bdanitz@wsgr.com Michael James Hines mhines@lukins.com,mlindquist@lukins.com Stephanie Lynn Jensen sjensen@wsgr.com,rcarter@wsgr.com Barry M Kaplan bkaplan@wsgr.com,cfoung@wsgr.com,rcarter@wsgr.com Matthew S Melamed mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sd@rgrdlaw.com,e_file_sf@rgrdlaw.com John C Roberts, Jr jroberts@wsgr.com,rcarter@wsgr.com Sunny September Sarkis ssarkis@rgrdlaw.com,ajohnson@rgrdlaw.com Christopher Paul Seefer chriss@rgrdlaw.com,ptiffith@rgrdlaw.com,ssarkis@rgrdlaw.com,mmelamed@rgrdlaw.com Gregory L Watts gwatts@wsgr.com,rcarter@wsgr.com Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. (No manual recipients)