ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia
|
|
- Melissa McCarthy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 To: Students, Antitrust Law And Economics Greetings and welcome to the class. Regarding the class syllabus, the cases which are in bold print are for student class recitation. In view of time constraints, and to facilitate efficiency, you may agree in advance among yourselves as to who will recite each case assigned (perhaps in an alphabetical fashion). As to recitation, I recommend the following format: Statement of the facts; who are the parties; what is/are the issue(s) to be decided; the contentions/arguments of the parties; the holding of the Court; the reasoning of the Court; and the lesson of law derived from the case. Best regards, Professor Paul Bartlett, Jr. UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER June, 2013 REQUIRED TEXT: ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia Page 1 of 6
2 Pitofsky, Goldschmid and Wood, Trade Regulation, 6 th edition, 2010, with the 2011 Supplement (University Casebook Series, Foundation Press) Assigned Readings from Pitofsky et. al.: Chapter 1. (Lecture) The Objectives and Origins of Antitrust Law (pp. 1-53) Section 1. The Goals of Antitrust Policy 1. The Role of Competition and Alternatives to Competitive Markets 2. The Sherman Act and Comparative Legislation 2. The Historical Sources of Antitrust, Legislative History, and Early Developments 1. The Early Law on Monopoly and Contracts in Restraint of Trade 2. The Sherman Act - Some Legislative History 3. Early Development of Legal Doctrine Chapter II. (Lecture) Institutional Framework of Antitrust Policy (pp ) 1. The Three Level Antitrust Enforcement Pattern 1. Sources of Antitrust Litigation 2. Special Issues Related to Enforcement by the Federal Agencies 3. Special Issue Related to Private Enforcement Reiter v. Sonotone Blue Shield v. McCready Hawaii v. Standard Oil Associated General Contractors v. California State Council Illinois Brick v. Illinois California v. Arc America 4. Special Issues Related to the Big Case 2. The Limits of Antitrust 1. Government Ownership of the Means of Production 2. Regulated Industries 3. Interstate and Foreign Commerce 4. Additional Exemptions, Exclusions, and other Aspects of Economic Control Page 2 of 6
3 Chapter III Market Structure and a First Look at the Problem of Monopoly Power (pp ) 1. Monopolization and the Problem of Market Definition U.S. v. Alcoa U.S. v. Du Pont (Cellophane) U.S. v. Grinnell Note on Market Power and Consumer Loss (Lecture) Chapter IV Competitor Collaboration on Price Fixing and Division of Markets (pp ; ) 1. Conspiracy in Theory and Action 2. Development of the Per Se Rule on Price Fixing U.S. v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. Chicago Board of Trade v. U.S. Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. U.S. U.S. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. 3. Characterization Questions and Other Issues Broadcast Music Inc, v. Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc. NCAA v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma Texaco Inc. v. Dagher 4. Division of Territories and Some Other Horizontal Restraints Timken, General Motors, and Sealy (Lecture) U.S. v. Topco Associates, Inc. Palmer v. Barbri Chapter V Group Refusals to Deal and Joint Ventures (pp ) 1. Refusals to Deal F.O.G.A. v. FTC Klor s Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Rambus v. FTC Northwest Wholesale Stationers v. Pacific Stationary Page 3 of 6
4 FTC v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association 2. Joint Ventures Revisited: Issues of Membership and Access Associated Press v. U.S. 3. Efforts to Influence Government Action (Lecture) Columbia v. Onmi Outdoor Advertising (Lecture) Chapter VI Market Concentration, Conspiracy and the Antitrust Laws (pp ; ) 1. Note on Oligopoly (469) 2. Inference of Agreement as a Legal Building Block(471) Theatre Enterprises v. Paramount Film (479) Toys R Us, Inc. v. FTC (484) Todd v. Exxon Corporation (525) In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation (558) U.S. v. Container Corp. (p. 588) U.S. v. Gypsum (Lecture) 3. Intra-Enterprise Conspiracy (p. 613) Copperweld v. Independence Tube Corp. (Lecture) American Needle v. NFL (Supplement, p. 1) Chapter VII Vertical Restraints on Competition (pp )) 1. The Economics of Vertical Restraints 2. The Interplay of Common Law and Antitrust Laws 1. Vertical Price Fixing Dr. Miles v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (Lecture) State Oil v. Khan Leegin v. PSKS Note on Resale Price Maintenance and the Fair Trade Laws 2. Customer and Territorial Restraints Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania 3. Vertical Restraints and Refusal to Deal U.S. v. Colgate Co. U.S. v. Parke, Davis & Co.(Lecture) Page 4 of 6
5 Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp. Chapter VIII Additional Limitations on a Single Firm Exercising Market Power (pp ) 1. Monopoly Conduct Revisited Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko United States v. Microsoft (767) 2. Attempt to Monopolize (Lecture) Lorain Journal v. United States Spectrum Sports v. McQuillan 3. Predatory Price Cutting (Lecture) Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco United States v. AMR Corp., American Airlines, Inc. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber 4. Tying Arrangements Clayton Act, Section 3 International Salt Co. v. United States Jefferson Parish Hospital v. Hyde Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services (Lecture) Chapter IX Mergers (pp ) 1. Background on Early Merger Law and the Amendment of Section 7 of the Clayton Act in 1950 Clayton Act, Section 7 2. Proscribed Effect in Horizontal Mergers U.S. v. Philadelphia National Bank U.S. v. Alcoa; U.S. v. Pabst Brewing; U.S. v. Von s Grocery Hospital Corporation of America v. FTC Page 5 of 6
6 U.S. Department of Justice and FTC Joint Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 2010 (Supplement, p. 3) FTC v. Whole Foods 3. Joint Ventures, Potential Competition, and Conglomerate Mergers U.S. v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co. Texaco v. Dagher FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co. FTC v. Consolidated Foods 4. Integration Through Vertical Merger U.S. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. Brown Shoe Co. v. U.S. Page 6 of 6
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS by ElNER ELHAUGE Petrie Professor of Law, Harvard University FOUNDATION PRESS ^ANNIVERSARY] THOMSON "WEST TABLE OF CASES xiii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 A. The Framework
More informationAntitrust Syllabus (construction in progress)
Last updated: April 11, 2013 Antitrust Syllabus (construction in progress) Page references are to the casebook, Rogers, Calkins, Patterson & Andersen, Antitrust Law: Policy and Practice (4th ed. 2007).
More informationANTITRUST LAW, POLICY AND PROCEDURE
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY AND PROCEDURE Cases, Materials, Problems Sixth Edition E. Thomas Sullivan Senior Vice President and Provost & Julius E. Davis Chair in Law University of Minnesota 'Law School Herbert
More informationANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE. Cases, Materials, Problems. Seventh Edition
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE Cases, Materials, Problems Seventh Edition. Thomas Sullivan President ofthe University of Vermont and Dean Emeritus, University of Minnesota Law School Herbert Hovenkamp
More informationCopyright 2014 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE: CASES, MATERIALS, PROBLEMS SEVENTH EDITION
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE: CASES, MATERIALS, PROBLEMS SEVENTH EDITION LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Herzog Summer
More informationSyllabus -- Franchise and Distribution Law/Professor Devlin/Fall 2008
Preliminary (subject to change) Syllabus -- Franchise and Distribution Law/Professor Devlin/Fall 2008 Meets Tuesday and Thursday 10:30 Noon Room TBD Casebook Schneider and Ney - Business Franchise Law:
More informationLecture Notes: Industrial Organization in Context (to be distributed).
Stephen Martin EC 361 Economics of Antitrust & Regulation Spring 2008 smartin@purdue.edu T & Th 9:00-10:15 494 4402 KRAN G012 Office hours: T, Th 10:30-11:30 and by appointment, 4027 Rawls. Course web
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 DEBRA HOSLEY, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION; and DOES TO 0,
More informationWorking Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement
Unclassified DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2016)10 DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2016)10 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 02-Jun-2016
More informationThe typical lawyer in Colorado does not make his or her living
Reproduced by permission. 2014 Colorado Bar Association 43 The Colorado Lawyer 19 (October 2014). All rights reserved. ANTITRUST AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW Antitrust for All: A Primer for the Non-Antitrust
More informationAnglo-American Law. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes. Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law.
Anglo-American Law Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law. Introduction Mainly, agreements restricting competition are grouped
More informationGraduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust.
Graduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust. John Asker October 17, 2011 The purpose of these notes is not to give an introduction to the law of antitrust in any comprehensive way. Instead,
More informationNational Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and University of Georgia Athletic Association
Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 61 Issue 3 Article 5 June 1985 National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and University of Georgia Athletic Association Susan
More informationAntitrust Law and Economic Theory: Finding a Balance
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 45 Issue 1 2013 Fall Article 3 2013 Antitrust Law and Economic Theory: Finding a Balance Edward D. Cavanagh St. John's University School of Law Follow this
More informationSOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
2009] 895 SOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT Robert Pitofsky * INTRODUCTION I have been given the challenge of discussing what antitrust enforcement is likely to be over the next four
More informationUnited States ELEANOR M. FOX AND ROBERT PITOFSKY. Goals of US Competition Policy. Economic and Noneconomic Goals
United States 7 ELEANOR M. FOX AND ROBERT PITOFSKY This chapter provides an overview of US antitrust law, with emphasis on those portions that affect international trade and global competition. In a few
More information"JUSTICE" AND OTHER NON-ECONOMIC GOALS OF ANTITRUST Louis B. ScHwA-rz [
"JUSTICE" AND OTHER NON-ECONOMIC GOALS OF ANTITRUST Louis B. ScHwA-rz [ [Vol. 127:1076 (Comments on Pitofsky, The Political Content of Antitrust) Commissioner Pitofsky's admirable delineation and defense
More information10 TH ANNUAL HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER S ROUNDTABLE VBA HEALTH LAW SECTION
10 TH ANNUAL HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER S ROUNDTABLE VBA HEALTH LAW SECTION ANTITRUST SCRUTINY OF HEALTH CARE TRANSACTIONS HEMAN A. MARSHALL, III Woods Rogers, PLC 540-983-7654 marshall@woodsrogers.com November
More informationThe Scope of the Insurance Industry's Sherman Act Exemption: New Considerations
Boston College Law Review Volume 19 Issue 2 Number 2 Article 3 1-1-1978 The Scope of the Insurance Industry's Sherman Act Exemption: New Considerations Leonard M. Singer Follow this and additional works
More informationA RELUCTANT STANDARD-BEARER FOR CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST
A RELUCTANT STANDARD-BEARER FOR CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST By Max Huffman 1 I. CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST Chicago School Antitrust is the name given to a set of ideas of antitrust law interpretation and enforcement
More informationThe Fractured Unity of Antitrust Law and the Antitrust Jurisprudence of Justice
Yale Law School Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship Series Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1996 The Fractured Unity of Antitrust Law and the Antitrust Jurisprudence
More informationLegal Aspects of Competitive Construction Market Behavior-An Assessment in Support of VDOT's Antitrust Monitoring and Detection Effort
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1229 53 Legal Aspects of Competitive Construction Market Behavior-An Assessment in Support of VDOT's Antitrust Monitoring and Detection Effort GARY R. ALLEN AND DONALD CULKIN
More informationThe Abiding Influence of The Antitrust Paradox: An Essay in Honor of Robert H. Bork
Yale Law School Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship Series Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2008 The Abiding Influence of The Antitrust Paradox: An Essay in Honor of
More informationANTITRUST LAW: POLICY AND PRACTICE Fourth Edition
ANTITRUST LAW: POLICY AND PRACTICE Fourth Edition 2013 Supplement C. Paul Rogers III Professor of Law and Former Dean Dedman School of Law Southern Methodist University Stephen Calkins Professor of Law
More informationLegal Methodology in Antitrust Law
Thema/Anlass Datum Seite 1 Legal Methodology in Antitrust Law 10,502,1.00 Comparative Legal Methods Prof. Dr. Peter Hettich, LL.M. Friday, November 16, 2007, 12:35 Agenda Substantive Law and Procedure
More informationRefusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke, Davis and the Vitality of the Colgate Doctrine
Fordham Law Review Volume 32 Issue 3 Article 5 1964 Refusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke, Davis and the Vitality of the Colgate Doctrine Recommended Citation Refusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 06-480 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., v. Petitioner, PSKS, INC., doing business as
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 08-661 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Petitioner, V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationWhat Should Be Next at the Supreme Court?
theantitrustsource www.antitrustsource.com December 2007 1 What Should Be Next at the Supreme Court? Jonathan M. Jacobson I In asking What s next at the Supreme Court, we can focus on what we think will
More informationA Different Approach to Antimonopolization Enforcement for the Obama Admininstration
A Different Approach to Antimonopolization Enforcement for the Obama Admininstration Andrew J. Pincus May 2009 President Barack Obama promised during the 2008 presidential campaign that he would reinvigorate
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH ) BENEFITS FUND, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-12277-PBS ) ) McKESSON CORPORATION, ) Defendant.
More informationCOMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES LAW
COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES LAW December 29, 2017 The views stated in this submission are
More informationCongressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education. Area of Practice: Antitrust Law
LexisNexis Congressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education Area of Practice: Antitrust Law Use primary source congressional documents to: Understand legislative process Compile research
More informationTHE COMMON LAW OF SECTION 2: IS IT STILL ALIVE AND WELL?
2008] 1163 THE COMMON LAW OF SECTION 2: IS IT STILL ALIVE AND WELL? J. Thomas Rosch * The Supreme Court has given the antitrust community much to chew on with nine decisions in the last four years. These
More informationFacts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence
Facts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence Sale Kwon * I. INTRODUCTION... 84 II. IMPORTANCE OF INTENT
More informationThe Grinnell Test of Monopolization Sounds a False Alarm: Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
Boston College Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Number 2 Article 7 3-1-1987 The Grinnell Test of Monopolization Sounds a False Alarm: Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. David M. Rievman Follow
More informationDoes Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage?
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1999 Does Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage? Frank H. Easterbrook Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles
More informationcertiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
OCTOBER TERM, 1992 447 Syllabus SPECTRUM SPORTS, INC., et al. v. McQUILLAN et vir, dba SORBOTURF ENTERPRISES certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 91 10. Argued November
More informationAnti-Trust Law - Applicability of Section 7 of the Clayton Act to Bank Mergers - United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S.
DePaul Law Review Volume 13 Issue 1 Fall-Winter 1963 Article 12 Anti-Trust Law - Applicability of Section 7 of the Clayton Act to Bank Mergers - United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321
More informationPARALEGAL INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff, against AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 77 C 1478
PARALEGAL INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff, against AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 77 C 1478 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 475 F. Supp. 1123; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CASE 0:11-cv-03354-PAM-AJB Document 22 Filed 06/13/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Gene Washington, Diron Talbert, and Sean Lumpkin, on behalf of themselves and all others
More informationAN T I T R U S T C H A L L E N G E S T O
Antitrust, Vol. 31, No. 1, Fall 2016. 2016 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in
More informationHandbook Of The Law Of Antitrust. By Lawrence A. Sullivan, St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Company
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 35 Issue 1 Article 15 Winter 1-1-1978 Handbook Of The Law Of Antitrust. By Lawrence A. Sullivan, St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Company. 1977. Joseph E. Ulrich
More informationWhy Do Bad Antitrust Decisions Sometimes Make Good Law? The Alcoa and Brown Shoe Examples
SMU Law Review Volume 71 Issue 1 Article 12 2018 Why Do Bad Antitrust Decisions Sometimes Make Good Law? The Alcoa and Brown Shoe Examples C. Paul Rogers III Southern Methodist University, crogers@smu.edu
More informationSTATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the SUBCOMMITTEE
STATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION before the SUBCOMMITTEE on COURTS, THE INTERNET, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMITTEE
More information1 Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer 2 Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor 3 Consumers
American Concrete Pipe Association Professional Product Proficiency A Technical and Sales/Marketing Training Program ACPA Sales and Marketing Series Module I: Sales Basics 1 Course 1: Antitrust Author:
More informationAntitrust, Regulatory Harm, and Economic Liberty
Antitrust, Regulatory Harm, and Economic Liberty Alan J. Meese I. NACHBAR S CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH: BANNING REGULATORY RESTRAINTS... 115 II. A BETTER CONSTITUTIONAL APPROACH: HOW REGULATORY RESTRAINTS
More informationThe Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena
The Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena The rule of reason is designed and used to eliminate anti-competitive transactions from the market. This
More informationAntitrust Regulation And Problems Of Oligopoly Structure: Helix Milling Co. V. Terminal Flour Mills Co., 523 F.2D 1317 (9Th Cir. 1975).
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 33 Issue 3 Article 6 Summer 6-1-1976 Antitrust Regulation And Problems Of Oligopoly Structure: Helix Milling Co. V. Terminal Flour Mills Co., 523 F.2D 1317 (9Th Cir.
More informationINTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES. By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr.
INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr. In today s global economy, and with the advent of purchasing via the Internet,
More informationCleveland State University. Matthew T. Polito
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Journal of Law and Health Law Journals 2002 Can Cleveland Clinic Health System Be Trusted: Whether a Proposed Merger or Acquisition by Cleveland Clinic
More informationState Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act
State Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act Katherine M. Brockmeyer * Table of Contents I. Introduction...
More informationProtest Boycotts as Restraints of Trade under the Sherman Act: A Proposed Standard
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 1981 Protest Boycotts as Restraints of Trade under the Sherman Act: A Proposed Standard Francis M. Allegra Follow
More informationLEGAL UPDATE MICROSOFT: EXCLUSIVE DEALING UNDER SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT: A NEW STANDARD? Shannon A. Keyes
LEGAL UPDATE MICROSOFT: EXCLUSIVE DEALING UNDER SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT: A NEW STANDARD? Shannon A. Keyes I. INTRODUCTION The United States Supreme Court has denied the Justice Department s petition
More informationDetermination of the Relevant Product Market
The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 26, Issue 2 (1965) 1965 Determination of the Relevant Product Market Werth,
More informationThe Expansion of Horizontal Merger Defenses After General Dynamics: A Suggested Reconsideration of Sherman Act Principles
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 12 Issue 3 Spring 1981 Antitrust Symposium: Mergers Article 4 1981 The Expansion of Horizontal Merger Defenses After General Dynamics: A Suggested Reconsideration
More informationA New Chapter in Antitrust Law: The Second Circuit's Decision in United States v. Apple Determines Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy Per Se Illegal
Boston College Law Review Volume 57 Issue 6 Electronic Supplement Article 6 4-7-2016 A New Chapter in Antitrust Law: The Second Circuit's Decision in United States v. Apple Determines Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy
More informationUNITED STATES v. SEALY, INC.
350 OCTOBER TERM, 1966. Syllabus. 388U.S. UNITED STATES v. SEALY, INC. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED.STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 9. Argued April 20, 1967.-Decided June 12,
More informationNCAA v. Board of Regents: Supreme Court Intercepts Per Se Rule and Rule of Reason
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 5-1-1985 NCAA v. Board of Regents: Supreme Court Intercepts Per Se Rule and Rule of Reason Peter W. Bellas Follow
More informationHorizontal Territorial Restraints And The Per Se Rule
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Article 12 Fall 9-1-1971 Horizontal Territorial Restraints And The Per Se Rule Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr
More informationThe Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 45 Issue 4 Article 8 1980 The Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation Jerry L. Beane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended
More informationIntroduction into US business law VIII FS 2017
Introduction into US business law VIII FS 2017 Repetition last time: torts > Torts > Civil wrong > Relevance (incl. Excessive damages reforms?) > Intentional > Negligence > To proof: > Duty to care, breach
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More informationANTITRUST DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1967 TO 2007
ANTITRUST DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1967 TO 2007 Leah Brannon Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University School of Law Competition Policy International,
More informationThe Facial Unreasonableness Theory: Filling the Void Between Per Se and Rule of Reason
St. John's Law Review Volume 55 Issue 4 Volume 55, Summer 1981, Number 4 Article 3 July 2012 The Facial Unreasonableness Theory: Filling the Void Between Per Se and Rule of Reason Daniel F. De Vita Follow
More informationGovernment & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series
Government & Global Trade Post-Inauguration Webinar Series The New Administration s Impact on Antitrust Law Christopher J. Kelly Donald C. Klawiter Carolyn P. Osolinik June 4, 2009 Partner Partner Partner
More informationAntitrust--Clayton Act--Section 7 Restrictions Held Applicable to Joint Ventures (United States v. Penn-Olin Chem. Co., 378 U.S.
St. John's Law Review Volume 39, December 1964, Number 1 Article 9 Antitrust--Clayton Act--Section 7 Restrictions Held Applicable to Joint Ventures (United States v. Penn-Olin Chem. Co., 378 U.S. 158 (1964))
More informationCleveland State University. Anthony J. Lazzaro
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2004 Monopoly Leveraging in Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP: Why the United States
More informationLessons ofauo: Application of the Per Se Rule Precluded Evaluation of the Reasons for, and Impact of Competitor Meetings
61ST ANNUAL ANTITRUST LAW SPRING MEETING April 10, 2013 3:45-5:15 pm Lessons From the AU0 Trial Lessons ofauo: Application of the Per Se Rule Precluded Evaluation of the Reasons for, and Impact of Competitor
More informationRidding the Law of Outdated Statutory Exemptions to Antitrust Law: A Proposal for Reform
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 47 Issue 2 2014 Ridding the Law of Outdated Statutory Exemptions to Antitrust Law: A Proposal for Reform Anne McGinnis University of Michigan Law School
More informationCase 4:14-cr PJH Document 212 Filed 03/22/17 Page 1 of 22
Case :-cr-000-pjh Document Filed 0// Page of 0 BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP David W. Shapiro (State Bar No. ) Dshapiro@boerschshapiro.com Martha Boersch (State Bar No. ) Mboersch@boerschshapiro.com Lara Kollios
More informationANTI-TRUST: COURT OF APPEALS APPLIES BROWN SHOE INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT TO PROHIBIT VERTICAL MERGER
ANTI-TRUST: COURT OF APPEALS APPLIES BROWN SHOE INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT TO PROHIBIT VERTICAL MERGER SINCE the passage of the Sherman Act' in 1890 Congress has repeatedly expressed
More informationWhat, Never? Well, Hardly Ever : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality, 38 Hastings L.J.
John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1987 What, Never? Well, Hardly Ever : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality,
More informationReasoning Per Se and Horizontal Price Fixing: An Emerging Trend in Antitrust Litigation?
Pepperdine Law Review Volume 14 Issue 1 Article 2 12-15-1986 Reasoning Per Se and Horizontal Price Fixing: An Emerging Trend in Antitrust Litigation? Joseph W. defuria Jr. Follow this and additional works
More information3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification
3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification In this case the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant violated Title 15, United States Code, Section 1, commonly
More informationConstitutional Law -- Sherman Act -- Cross- Elasticity in Determining Percentage of Market Control
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 5-1-1957 Constitutional Law -- Sherman Act -- Cross- Elasticity in Determining Percentage of Market Control Edgar
More informationMotion Picture Split Agreements: An Antitrust Analysis
Fordham Law Review Volume 52 Issue 1 Article 5 1983 Motion Picture Split Agreements: An Antitrust Analysis William J. Borner Recommended Citation William J. Borner, Motion Picture Split Agreements: An
More informationAntitrust Law - The Per Se Rule - Naked Horizontal Territorial Restraints Held to Be Illegal Per Se
Volume 18 Issue 1 Article 7 1972 Antitrust Law - The Per Se Rule - Naked Horizontal Territorial Restraints Held to Be Illegal Per Se A. Roy DeCaro Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21723 Updated August 1, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Trinko: Telecommunications Consumers Cannot Use Antitrust Laws to Remedy Access
More informationMOVING BEYOND CARICATURE AND CHARACTERIZATION: THE MODERN RULE OF REASON IN PRACTICE
DO NOT DELETE 5/15/2012 1:13 PM MOVING BEYOND CARICATURE AND CHARACTERIZATION: THE MODERN RULE OF REASON IN PRACTICE ANDREW I. GAVIL * I. INTRODUCTION After one hundred years one might expect a rule of
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15-3001 WOODMAN S FOOD MARKET, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellee, CLOROX COMPANY AND CLOROX SALES COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from
More informationAmerican Needle, Inc. v. National Football League: Justice Stevens Last Twinkling of an Eye
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 3-1-2011 American Needle, Inc. v. National
More informationCANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES WHAT CANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES NEED TO KNOW ABOUT U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS THERESA J. ARNOLD.
CANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES 557 WHAT CANADIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES NEED TO KNOW ABOUT U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS THERESA J. ARNOLD. The author presents an introduction to and a cautionary warning about the
More informationNCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma: Has the Supreme Court Abrogated the Per Se Rule of Antitrust Analysis
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Law Reviews 12-1-1985 NCAA v. Board of Regents of
More information12/6/ :35:59 AM
The Untwining of Patent Law and Antitrust: No Presumption of Market Power in Patent Tying Cases According to the Supreme Court in Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink Sue Ann Mota 1 I. INTRODUCTION Congress
More informationWhither Price Squeeze Antitrust?
JANUARY 2008, RELEASE ONE Whither Price Squeeze Antitrust? Jonathan M. Jacobson and Valentina Rucker Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Whither Price Squeeze Antitrust? Jonathan M. Jacobson and Valentina
More informationAntitrust - Repudiation of the Intraenterprise Conspiracy Doctrine - Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.
Campbell Law Review Volume 7 Issue 3 Summer 1985 Article 4 January 1985 Antitrust - Repudiation of the Intraenterprise Conspiracy Doctrine - Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. Ellen M. Gregg Follow
More informationIf Per Se Is Dying, Why Not in TV Tying? A Case for Adopting the Rule of Reason Standard in Television Block- Booking Arrangements
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 12 Volume XII Number 1 Volume XII Book 1 Article 5 2002 If Per Se Is Dying, Why Not in TV Tying? A Case for Adopting the Rule of
More informationPatents, Tying and Market Power: The Implications of ITW v. Independent Ink for Antitrust Claims Against IP Owners
Patents, Tying and Market Power: The Implications of ITW v. Independent Ink for Antitrust Claims Against IP Owners Andrew J. Pincus Christopher J. Kelly March 14, 2006 Summary of Seminar The case, the
More informationOKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 WINTER 2004 NUMBER 4 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OKLAHOMA ANTITRUST LAW
OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 WINTER 2004 NUMBER 4 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OKLAHOMA ANTITRUST LAW D. KENT MEYERS * & JENNIFER A. DUTTON ** This Article covers six antitrust topics of interest addressed
More informationThe Interface between Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law in the North American Context
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 12 Issue Article 16 January 1987 The Interface between Intellectual Property Law and Competition Law in the North American Context Tom Arnold Craig M. Lundell Michael
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 1:04-cv-00121-BLW Document 78 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ROBERT AND RENAE BAFUS, ) et al., ) ) Case No. CV-04-121-S-BLW Plaintiffs, )
More informationMarquette Law Review. James H. Gormley Jr. Volume 62 Issue 2 Winter Article 5
Marquette Law Review Volume 62 Issue 2 Winter 1978 Article 5 Antitrust: Professions: Per Se Rule Applied to Ethical Canon Against Competitive Bidding. (National Society of Professional Engineers v. United
More informationDevelopments in Section Two of the Sherman Act
Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 1986 Developments in Section Two of the Sherman Act Joseph P. Bauer Notre Dame Law School, jbauer@nd.edu Follow this and additional works
More informationAntitrust More than a Century After Sherman: Why Protecting Competitors Promotes Competition More than Economically Efficient Mergers
From the SelectedWorks of Andreas Koutsoudakis, Esq. 2009 Antitrust More than a Century After Sherman: Why Protecting Competitors Promotes Competition More than Economically Efficient Mergers Andreas Koutsoudakis,
More informationJUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW
March 30, 2017 JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW To Our Clients and Friends: As Judge Neil Gorsuch proceeds through the Senate confirmation process, we are continuing
More informationMethodist Health Services Corporation v. OSF Healthcare System d/b/a Saint Francis Medical Center Doc. 131
Methodist Health Services Corporation v. OSF Healthcare System d/b/a Saint Francis Medical Center Doc. 131 E-FILED Wednesday, 25 March, 2015 07:19:02 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationA Survey of the Antitrust Law of Exclusive Agreements
University of Richmond Law Review Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 8 1972 A Survey of the Antitrust Law of Exclusive Agreements John H. Shenefield Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle December 2013 (1) Cartels: Confusing Covert and Ancillary M. Howard Morse Cooley LLP www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition Policy International, Inc. 2013 Copying,
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS22700 Resale Price Maintenance No Longer a Per Se Antitrust Offense: Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc. Janice
More information