ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY AND PROCEDURE
|
|
- Mae Bennett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY AND PROCEDURE Cases, Materials, Problems Sixth Edition E. Thomas Sullivan Senior Vice President and Provost & Julius E. Davis Chair in Law University of Minnesota 'Law School Herbert Hovenkamp - Ben and Dorothy Willie Professor University of Iowa College of Law Howard A. Shelanski Professor of Law and Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology University of California Berkeley School of Law 2009 LexisNexis"
2 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE COMPETITION MODEL... 1 I OVERVIEW: THE POLICIES AND GOALS OF ANTITRUST REGULATION :. : :! 1 R.H. LANDE, WEALTH TRANSFERS AS THE ORIGINAL AND PRIMARY CONCERN OF ANTITRUST: THE EFFICIENCY INTERPRETATION CHALLENGED : v ;. 6 II COMMON LAW LEGACIES 12 [A] English Foundations 12 W. LETWIN, LAW AND ECONOMIC POLICY IN AMERICA: THE EVOLUTION OF THE SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT 12 [1] Contracts in Restraint of Trade 15 [2] Combinations in Restraint of Trade 16 [B] American Common Law Tradition 18 [C] Development of Legislation 20 [D] Early Interpretations 22 United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass 'n 22 NOTES AND QUESTIONS. 24 United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co 26 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 29 Chapter 2 FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS 33 I THE ECONOMIC PROBLEM 33 [A] Introduction 33 [B] Law of Demand 33 [C] The Theory of Costs 36 II THE MARKET IN MOVEMENT..' [A] Perfect Competition 41 [B] Monopoly 44 [C] Relative Performances of Competition and Monopoly 46 III JUDICIAL EMPHASIS ON ECONOMIC REASONING 48 [A] Introduction 48 [B] Structuralist Analysis 48 [C] Efficiency Analysis 49 [D] Strategic Behavior Analysis 50 Chapter 3 SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT 53! I ENFORCEMENT 53 [A] Tripartite Approach 53 xv
3 [1] Department of Justice 53 [a] Civil Action 53 [b] Criminal Prosecutions 54 [2] Federal Trade Commission 57 [3] Private Suits 58 [a] Jurisdiction, Venue, and Service 60 [b] Statute of Limitations, 63 [c] Interstate Commerce Requirement 66 Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas 67 NOTES AND QUESTIONS, 71 [d] Transnational Application of United States Antitrust Laws 73 NOTE: INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST GUIDELINES 79 [e] The Direct Purchaser Requirement and the Problem of Passing On. 81 Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois 81 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 88 [f] "Business or Property" Requirement. 96 Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. 96 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 99 [g] Antitrust Injury 99 Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-o-Mat, Inc. 100 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 103 Car gill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc 104 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 110 [h] Standing to Sue 115 Blue Shield of Virginia v. Mccready 115 Associated General Contractors v. California State Council of Carpenters 118 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 123 [B] Parens Patriae 124 [C] Advisory Opinions and Clearances Procedure 125 [D] Settlement 126 [E] Preclusion Effects of a Prior Judgment on Subsequent Private Suits [F] Antitrust Counterclaims 133 [G] Expert Testimony After Daubert 134 Concord Boat Corp. v. Brunswick Corp 135 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 138 II ADDITIONAL ANTITRUST DEFENSES 139 [A] First Amendment Protections 139 [1] Noerr-Pennington Doctrine 139 [2] Economic/Political Boycotts 140 [3] Overbroad Remedial Orders 140 [B] In Pari Delicto and the Unclean Hands Doctrine 142 Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp. 142 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 145 xvi
4 HI REMEDIES ; 147 [A]. Damages 147 [1]. Optimal Antitrust Damages 149. [2] The Optimal Deterrence Model and Treble Damages. 152 [B] Award^of Attorney's Fees '......' 153 [C] Injunctive Relief and Structural Remedies. ; California v.. American Stores Co. 157 )... NOTES AND QUESTIONS : 160 [D]. Contribution and Claim Reduction 161 Chapter 4 CARTELS AND OTHER JOINT CONDUCT BY COMPETITORS.; 163 I HORIZONTAL RESTRAINTS. 163 [A], The Development of Analytical and Evidentiary Rules. : 163 '' [1] Introduction: The Problems of Horizontal Arrangements 163 [2] Rules of Reason and Per Se Illegality [3] Guidelines for Collaboration Among Competitors [B] Price Fixing 166 ' [1] The Foundation Cases : 166 Chicago Board of Trade v. United States 166 NOTES AND QUESTIONS. ; United States v. Trenton Potteries Co 169 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ; 171 Appalachian Coals, Inc. v. United States 172. NOTES AND QUESTIONS. : 176 [2], Supply or Output Restrictions.....:.."... : 177 United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.... : 177 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 182 [3] Agreements Limiting Price Competition... ; 185 [a] Introduction: Fee Schedules 185 "" [4] Data Dissemination and Information Exchanges';...: ' Maple Flooring Manufacturers Ass'nv. United States 191 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.' United States v. Container Corp. of America.'! 197 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 201 United States v. United States Gypsum Co r 202 NOTES AND QUESTIONS '.'. 206 [5] The Meaning and Scope of the Rule of Reason...: National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States NOTE. : 213 Broadcast Music, Inc.v. Columbia Broadcasting System 213 NOTES AND QUESTIONS :., Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc. : 222 xvii
5 Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society 224. NOTES AND QUESTIONS 231 National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v.'boardofregents 232 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.. ; :, : 240 California Dental Ass'n v. Federal TradeComm'n ' Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher 255 NOTES AND QUESTIONS. v.. : 258 [C] Proof of Agreement...". i...../,.:. ::.'. ; 264 [1] r Introduction <._...:.:,.'..-...~...-. : ; 264 [2] Conscious Parallelism and the Interstate Circuit Doctrine 265 Interstate Circuit v. United States. % NOTES AND QUESTIONS : 268 Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp NOTES AND QUESTIONS... ' 271. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly :...:. 272 NOTES AND QUESTIONS [3] Delivered Pricing and Base-Point Pricing Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute : 282 NOTES AND QUESTIONS : 288 [4] Oligopoly Pricing and Facilitating Devices 290 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. FTC ; 296 [5] IntraTEnterprise Conspiracy 301 Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp 302. NOTES AND QUESTIONS..." : 308 [6] Burdens of Proof and Summary Judgment Problems 314 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. VJZenith Radio Corp 314 NOTES AND QUESTIONS' ; 327 [D] Market Allocation.., : [1] Joint Ventures and Cooperative Research Ventures..' 337 [2] Joint Ventures and Patent Licensing Under Intellectual Property Guidelines 341 [3] Horizontal Market Divisions 342 United States v. Topco Associates 343 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 348 Polk Bros. v. Forest City Enterprises...:...: 350 NOTE : 353 [E] Boycotts and Other Concerted Refusals to Deal.... : 355 [1] Development of a Per Se Analysis: Collective Agreements Aimed at. Competitors,'.' 356 Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United States NOTES AND QUESTIONS 357 Klor'Si Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc 358 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 359 NYNEX Corporation v. Discon, Inc... ; i 363 xviii
6 . NOTES.AND QUESTIONS. ; 368 [2] Toward a Limited Balancing Approach: Collective Agreements Aimed at Customer Dealings 369 Paramount Famous Lasky Corp. v. United States 369 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 371 [3] Industry Self-Regulation and Disciplinary Actions Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co : : 374 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.._ FTC v. Indiana Federation Of Dentists 380. NOTES AND QUESTIONS 387 [4] Naked and Ancillary Concerted Refusals to Deal 388 Associated Press v. United States 388 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 390 [5] Noncommercial Boycotts.' 392 Missouri v. National Organization For Women 393 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 397 Chapter 5 VERTICAL RESTRICTIONS 399 I INTRABRAND DISTRIBUTIONAL RESTRAINTS 399., [A] Rationales,., 399 [B] Resale Price Maintenance 401 [1] Setting Vertical Minimum Prices 401 Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., dba Kay's Kloset... Kay's Shoes 401 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 420 [2] Consignment Contracts as Vertical Price Control Devices 427 [3] Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Colgate Doctrine 429 United States v. Colgate & Co 429 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 430 [4] Vertical Maximum Price Fixing 431 State Oil Company v. Khan 432 NOTES AND QUESTIONS [5] Dealer Termination; Powerful Complaining Dealers 436 Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp. 438 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 442 [C] Territorial and Customer Restraints: From White Motor to Sylvania Continental TV., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc 449 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.. 7..<..' 457 [1] Dual Distribution Systems - Vertical or Horizontal 461 [D] Exclusive Dealerships... J 462 II INTERBRAND VERTICAL FORECLOSURE MAINLY, EXCLUSIVE DEALING AND TYING.. : 466 xix
7 [A] Exclusive Dealing Under the Rule of Reason 468 Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co:. 473 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 476 NOTE: EXCLUSIVE DEALING AND 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT 479 [B] Tying Arrangements 480 [1] Introduction: Economics of Tying 480 [2] Development of Unique Per Se Rule for Tying Arrangements 484 Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States 485 Northern PacificRailway.v. United States 488 NOTES AND QUESTIONS. 492 [3] Modern Doctrine Tying Product Power and Anticompetitive Effects. 494 Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde 494 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ; 509 Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. 510 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 523 United States v. Microsoft Corp i NOTE 533 United States v. Microsoft Corp.., 534 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 537 [4] Tying and Intellectual Property.' i 538 Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. ' 538 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ':: '.'. 546 [5] Full Line Forcing, Full System Contracts, and Franchise Arrangements 549 United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp...' 550 NOTE 553 [6] Unfair Methods of Competition: Tying of Products Sold by Others Where There is a Financial Incentive 554 Chapter 6 MONOPOLY STRUCTURE, POWER, AND CONDUCT...; I THE PROBLEM OF MONOPOLY :.., : 557 United States v. American Can Co 557 NOTES.AND QUESTIONS 565 NOTE: THE ECONOMICS OF MONOPOLIZATION 567 United States v.aluminum Co. of America 570 NOTES AND QUESTIONS...' United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp 583 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 589 II THE MODERN MONOPOLIZATION OFFENSE: POWER 591 [A] Market Power, Barriers to Entry, and the Relevant Market 591 United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co... : 599 xx
8 NOTE: CROSS-ELASTICITY OF DEMAND 603 Telex Corp. v. IBM Corp. ;...: 605 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ;. 608 NOTE: BARRIERS TO ENTRY IN MONOPOLIZATION CASES ': '. 612 [B] The Geographic Market 616 United States v. Grinnell Corp: V 616 NOTES AND QUESTIONS..,.../ III THE MODERN MONOPOLIZATION OFFENSE: CONDUCT 622 [A] Innovation and Exclusion > Berkey Photo, Inc.v. Eastman Kodak.Co.: :...: 622 California Computer Products v. IBM Corp: I NOTES AND QUESTIONS...y, Vl 632 United States v. Microsoft Corp.. v. : 637 NOTES AND QUESTIONS /;.,.,._..,, 654 [B] Monopolization and the Intellectual Property Laws (Mainly Patent and Copyright)..., [1] Improprieties in Procurement or Enforcement of an Invalid Patent [2] Patent "Holdup"..., ; '..w :., 660 [3] Refusal to License IP Rights....., Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation 662 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 667 [4] Patent Accumulation '." : [C] Predatory Pricing and Related Practices...: 669 [1] Structural Prerequisites for a Predatory Pricing Claim "Recoupment" :'.'.....:' 670 Brooke Group Ltd. v: Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp 670 NOTES AND QUESTIONS J 680 NOTE: WHEN IS PREDATORY PRICING RATIONAL? 684 NOTE: PREDATORY PRICING AND THE ROBINSON-PATMAN '. ACT :..,...:..V 688 [2] Identifying the Predatory Price 690 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.<'..-..' '. 694 [3] Predatory Buying ' :.'.. :'.<. 697 Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., Inc. "....' : : 697 [4] Anticompetitive Discounting Practices, Including Package Discounts..:..:...: 703 Cascade Health Solutions v. Peacehealth : 703 NOTES AND QUESTIONS,: / [D] Vertical Integration, Refusals to Deal and Exclusionary Contracting [1] The Monopolist's Refusal to Deal and the Essential Facility Doctrine...-..' Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp xxi
9 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 725 NOTE: THE ESSENTIAL FACILITY DOCTRINE 730 Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP NOTES AND QUESTIONS,. 739 [2] Exclusionary Contracting by the Monopolist '. 740 United States v. Dentsply International, Inc. ; NOTES AND QUESTIONS..'. 750 NOTE: TYING AND EXCLUSIVE DEALING BY THE MONOPOLIST 751 [3] Vertical Integration and the Price "Squeeze"..:'...".-':: 753 Pacific Bell Telephone Co. dba AT&T California v. Linkline Communications, Inc '..:..' NOTES AND QUESTIONS'.." 758 IV THE OFFENSE OF ATTEMPT TO MONOPOLIZE 760 Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan... : 760 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 763 NOTE: CONSPIRACY TO MONOPOLIZE :.. ; 766 NOTE: INDUSTRIAL CONCENTRATION AND NON-DOMINANT FIRMS: FROM MONOPOLIZATION TO MERGER POLICY 767 Chapter 7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 771 I, VERTICAL INTEGRATION THROUGH MERGER 771 United States v. Columbia Steel Co : 771 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 774 United States v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co 774 NOTES AND QUESTIONS,' Brown Shoe Co. v. United States 779 NOTE \ ':. : 782 NOTE: THE ECONOMICS OF VERTICAL MERGERS 783 Silicon Graphics NOTES AND QUESTIONS 790 NOTE: MERGER GUIDELINES AND VERTICAL MERGERS 791 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 794 II MERGERS OF COMPETITORS.< 794 [A] The Development of Horizontal Merger Law Under the Sherman Act. 795 Northern Securities Co. v. United States 795 NOTES AND QUESTIONS.. > 798 United States v. Columbia Steel Co 799 -NOTES AND QUESTIONS,.801 [B] Horizontal Mergers Under Section 7 of the Clayton Act and Its 1950 Amendments 802 xxii
10 Brown Shoe Co. v. United States 803 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 809 United States v. Philadelphia National Bank 811 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 814 United States v. General Dynamics Corp 816 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 820 NOTE: PARTIAL ACQUISITIONS 822 [1] The 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines 824 NOTES AND QUESTIONS, 824 [2] Judicial Responses to the Merger Guidelines. 830 FTCv. Staples, Inc 830 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 836 NOTE: THE HERFINDAHL-HIRSCHMAN INDEX 837 Hospital Corp. of America v. FTC 839 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 842 NOTE: AN EFFICIENCY DEFENSE IN MERGER CASES? 848 Federal Trade Comm'n v. H.J. Heinz Co 851 NOTE: "UNILATERAL" ANTICOMPETITIVE EFFECTS OF HORIZONTAL MERGERS 859 NOTE: MERGERS AND INNOVATION 863 NOTE: GOVERNMENT GUIDELINES ON MERGER REMEDIES 865 III MERGERS OF POTENTIAL COMPETITORS 872 United States v. Sidney W. Winslow 872 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 873 United States v. Continental Can Co 874 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 879 FTC v. Procter & Gamble Co. 883 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 886 POTENTIAL COMPETITION 891 NOTE: THE COMMON CARRIER IMMUNITY FROM IV THE FAILING COMPANY DEFENSE ' Citizen Publishing Co. v. United States 894 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 896 V PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF SECTION Car gill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc 900 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 900 VI INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE CLAYTON ACT :. 902 Vn SHOULD WE REGULATE BIGNESS? 902 xxni
11 Chapter 8 SECONDARY-LINE DIFFERENTIAL PRICING AND THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT 909 I INTRODUCTION 909 [A] The Economics of Price Discrimination 910 [1] Perfect Price Discrimination 911 [2] Imperfect Price Discrimination 913 [B] Antitrust Policy and the Robinson-Patman Act 914 [C] The Technical Coverage of the Robinson-Patman Act 915 II PRIMARY-LINE DISCRIMINATION 917 III SECONDARY-LINE DISCRIMINATION 917 [A] "Price Discrimination" and "Injury to Competition" Under the Robinson- Patman Act 918 FTC v. Morton Salt Co 918 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 919 Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. v. Reeder-Simco Gmc, Inc 921 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 927 J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. 931 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 933 FTC v. Henry Broch & Co 934 NOTE 936 [B]. Commodities of "Like Grade and Quality" 936 FTCv. Borden Co 936 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 938 [C] Defenses 938 [1] The "Cost Justification" Defense 939 United States v. Borden Co 939 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 942 [2] The "Meeting Competition" Defense 943 United States v. United States Gypsum Co 943 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 946 Falls City Industries v. Vanco Beverage, Inc 946 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 950 [D] Robinson-Patman Violations by Buyers 951 Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. FTC 951 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 956 IV CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT 957 Chapter 9 ANTITRUST, OTHER FORMS OF REGULATION, AND EXEMPTIONS 959 I ANTITRUST AND AGENCY REGULATION 959 [A] Overview 959 [B] Theories of Regulation and the Movement Toward Deregulation 960 xxiv
12 [1] The Rise and Rationale of Regulation 961 [2] Natural Monopoly, Contestability, and Deregulation 962 ' [3] NETWORK DEREGULATION, INTERCONNECTION, AND ANTITRUST ; 966 [4] TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND DEREGULATION 968 [C] Jurisdictional and Prudential Problems of Antitrust Enforcement in Regulated Industries 971 Credit Suisse Securities LLCv. Billing 971 NOTES AND QUESTIONS. 979 [1] Prudential Considerations After Trinko 981 Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V... Trinko, LLP 981 NOTES AND QUESTIONS [D] Antitrust Exemptions,. 983 [i] Labor Organizations 983 [2] Export Associations 988 [3] Insurance 990 [4] Agricultural Organizations 992 [5] Professional Sports 993 [6] National Sovereign Immunity 995 II PETITIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT 996 [A] Political Process, "Rent- Seeking," and the Antitrust Laws 996 Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc 998 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1002 FTC v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass'n 1004 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1009 [B] The "Sham" Exception 1010 Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1017 m PROBLEMS OF FEDERALISM: PREEMPTION AND THE "STATE ACTION" DOCTRINE 1021 [A] Preemption 1021 Fisher v. City of Berkeley 1021 NOTES AND QUESTIONS..' [B] The "State Action" Doctrine 1024 California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass 'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1027 NOTE: FEDERALISM AND THE "STATE ACTION" DOCTRINE 1029 [1] The Authorization Requirement and the Problem of Local Government Antitrust Liability 1030 Hallie v. City ofeau Claire 1032 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1035 XXV
13 City of Columbia & Columbia Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc 1037 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1041 [2] The "Active Supervision" Requirement 1044 FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co ; 1046 NOTES AND QUESTIONS 1050 APPENDIX A: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES, APRIL 2, :.' App A-l APPENDIX B: SELECTED ANTITRUST STATUTES App B-l TABLE OF CASES TC-1 INDEX TC-1 XXVI
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE. Cases, Materials, Problems. Seventh Edition
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE Cases, Materials, Problems Seventh Edition. Thomas Sullivan President ofthe University of Vermont and Dean Emeritus, University of Minnesota Law School Herbert Hovenkamp
More informationANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia
To: Students, Antitrust Law And Economics Greetings and welcome to the class. Regarding the class syllabus, the cases which are in bold print are for student class recitation. In view of time constraints,
More informationUNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS by ElNER ELHAUGE Petrie Professor of Law, Harvard University FOUNDATION PRESS ^ANNIVERSARY] THOMSON "WEST TABLE OF CASES xiii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 A. The Framework
More informationCopyright 2014 Carolina Academic Press, LLC. All rights reserved. ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE: CASES, MATERIALS, PROBLEMS SEVENTH EDITION
ANTITRUST LAW, POLICY, AND PROCEDURE: CASES, MATERIALS, PROBLEMS SEVENTH EDITION LexisNexis Law School Publishing Advisory Board Paul Caron Professor of Law Pepperdine University School of Law Herzog Summer
More informationAntitrust Syllabus (construction in progress)
Last updated: April 11, 2013 Antitrust Syllabus (construction in progress) Page references are to the casebook, Rogers, Calkins, Patterson & Andersen, Antitrust Law: Policy and Practice (4th ed. 2007).
More informationSyllabus -- Franchise and Distribution Law/Professor Devlin/Fall 2008
Preliminary (subject to change) Syllabus -- Franchise and Distribution Law/Professor Devlin/Fall 2008 Meets Tuesday and Thursday 10:30 Noon Room TBD Casebook Schneider and Ney - Business Franchise Law:
More informationLecture Notes: Industrial Organization in Context (to be distributed).
Stephen Martin EC 361 Economics of Antitrust & Regulation Spring 2008 smartin@purdue.edu T & Th 9:00-10:15 494 4402 KRAN G012 Office hours: T, Th 10:30-11:30 and by appointment, 4027 Rawls. Course web
More information10 TH ANNUAL HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER S ROUNDTABLE VBA HEALTH LAW SECTION
10 TH ANNUAL HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER S ROUNDTABLE VBA HEALTH LAW SECTION ANTITRUST SCRUTINY OF HEALTH CARE TRANSACTIONS HEMAN A. MARSHALL, III Woods Rogers, PLC 540-983-7654 marshall@woodsrogers.com November
More informationAnglo-American Law. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes. Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law.
Anglo-American Law Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law. Introduction Mainly, agreements restricting competition are grouped
More informationAntitrust Injury in Robinson-Patman Cases: What s Left?
NOVEMBER 2008, RELEASE TWO Antitrust Injury in Robinson-Patman Cases: What s Left? Scott Martin Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Antitrust Injury in Robinson-Patman Cases: What s Left? Scott Martin* lthough
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More informationA Different Approach to Antimonopolization Enforcement for the Obama Admininstration
A Different Approach to Antimonopolization Enforcement for the Obama Admininstration Andrew J. Pincus May 2009 President Barack Obama promised during the 2008 presidential campaign that he would reinvigorate
More informationThe typical lawyer in Colorado does not make his or her living
Reproduced by permission. 2014 Colorado Bar Association 43 The Colorado Lawyer 19 (October 2014). All rights reserved. ANTITRUST AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW Antitrust for All: A Primer for the Non-Antitrust
More informationGraduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust.
Graduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust. John Asker October 17, 2011 The purpose of these notes is not to give an introduction to the law of antitrust in any comprehensive way. Instead,
More informationA RELUCTANT STANDARD-BEARER FOR CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST
A RELUCTANT STANDARD-BEARER FOR CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST By Max Huffman 1 I. CHICAGO SCHOOL ANTITRUST Chicago School Antitrust is the name given to a set of ideas of antitrust law interpretation and enforcement
More information1 Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer 2 Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor Distributor 3 Consumers
American Concrete Pipe Association Professional Product Proficiency A Technical and Sales/Marketing Training Program ACPA Sales and Marketing Series Module I: Sales Basics 1 Course 1: Antitrust Author:
More informationThe Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics 2006 The Antitrust Enterprise: Principle and Execution
More information12/6/ :35:59 AM
The Untwining of Patent Law and Antitrust: No Presumption of Market Power in Patent Tying Cases According to the Supreme Court in Illinois Tool Works v. Independent Ink Sue Ann Mota 1 I. INTRODUCTION Congress
More informationCongressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education. Area of Practice: Antitrust Law
LexisNexis Congressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education Area of Practice: Antitrust Law Use primary source congressional documents to: Understand legislative process Compile research
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 08-661 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Petitioner, V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationAntitrust Considerations for Participants in the Commodity Markets. Presented by: Michael H. Knight Stephen J. Obie
Antitrust Considerations for Participants in the Commodity Markets Presented by: Michael H. Knight Stephen J. Obie Administrative Items The webinar will be recorded and posted to the FIA website following
More informationState Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act
State Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act Katherine M. Brockmeyer * Table of Contents I. Introduction...
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 06-480 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., v. Petitioner, PSKS, INC., doing business as
More informationMarch 13, This comment is submitted in response to the United States Department of
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION PUBLIC ROUNDTABLE SERIES ON COMPETITION AND DEREGULATION, FIRST ROUNDTABLE ON STATE ACTION, STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS AND IMPLIED IMMUNITIES, COMMENT
More informationWorking Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement
Unclassified DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2016)10 DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2016)10 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 02-Jun-2016
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 555 U. S. (2009) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More information2(f) --Creates liability for the knowing recipient of a discriminatory price.
ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT I. INTRODUCTION The Robinson-Patman Act was enacted in 1936 to solidify and enhance the Clayton Act's attack on discriminatory pricing. The Act was designed to address specific types
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 DEBRA HOSLEY, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION; and DOES TO 0,
More informationLegal Methodology in Antitrust Law
Thema/Anlass Datum Seite 1 Legal Methodology in Antitrust Law 10,502,1.00 Comparative Legal Methods Prof. Dr. Peter Hettich, LL.M. Friday, November 16, 2007, 12:35 Agenda Substantive Law and Procedure
More informationThe Fractured Unity of Antitrust Law and the Antitrust Jurisprudence of Justice
Yale Law School Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship Series Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1996 The Fractured Unity of Antitrust Law and the Antitrust Jurisprudence
More informationINTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES. By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr.
INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr. In today s global economy, and with the advent of purchasing via the Internet,
More informationInvestigation No. 337-TA International Trade Commission
Investigation No. 337-TA-1002 International Trade Commission In the Matter of CERTAIN CARBON AND STEEL ALLOY PRODUCTS Comments of the International Center of Law & Economics Regarding the Commission s
More informationWhat Should Be Next at the Supreme Court?
theantitrustsource www.antitrustsource.com December 2007 1 What Should Be Next at the Supreme Court? Jonathan M. Jacobson I In asking What s next at the Supreme Court, we can focus on what we think will
More informationClient Advisory. United States Antitrust Guidelines. Corporate Department. I. The U.S. Antitrust Laws. July 2013
Client Advisory Corporate Department United States Antitrust Guidelines The American economic system depends upon free enterprise and open competition. The U.S. antitrust laws were enacted to help preserve
More informationWhither Price Squeeze Antitrust?
JANUARY 2008, RELEASE ONE Whither Price Squeeze Antitrust? Jonathan M. Jacobson and Valentina Rucker Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Whither Price Squeeze Antitrust? Jonathan M. Jacobson and Valentina
More informationPARALEGAL INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff, against AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 77 C 1478
PARALEGAL INSTITUTE, INC., Plaintiff, against AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 77 C 1478 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 475 F. Supp. 1123; 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH ) BENEFITS FUND, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-12277-PBS ) ) McKESSON CORPORATION, ) Defendant.
More informationTHE COMMON LAW OF SECTION 2: IS IT STILL ALIVE AND WELL?
2008] 1163 THE COMMON LAW OF SECTION 2: IS IT STILL ALIVE AND WELL? J. Thomas Rosch * The Supreme Court has given the antitrust community much to chew on with nine decisions in the last four years. These
More informationFacts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence
Facts That Shed Light on Intent of Single-Firm Refusals to Deal: Comparative Review of the United States and the Republic of Korea Jurisprudence Sale Kwon * I. INTRODUCTION... 84 II. IMPORTANCE OF INTENT
More informationSTATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the SUBCOMMITTEE
STATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION before the SUBCOMMITTEE on COURTS, THE INTERNET, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMITTEE
More informationSOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
2009] 895 SOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT Robert Pitofsky * INTRODUCTION I have been given the challenge of discussing what antitrust enforcement is likely to be over the next four
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15-3001 WOODMAN S FOOD MARKET, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellee, CLOROX COMPANY AND CLOROX SALES COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from
More informationIntroduction into US business law VIII FS 2017
Introduction into US business law VIII FS 2017 Repetition last time: torts > Torts > Civil wrong > Relevance (incl. Excessive damages reforms?) > Intentional > Negligence > To proof: > Duty to care, breach
More informationcertiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit
OCTOBER TERM, 1992 447 Syllabus SPECTRUM SPORTS, INC., et al. v. McQUILLAN et vir, dba SORBOTURF ENTERPRISES certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 91 10. Argued November
More informationPatent Portfolio Management and Technical Standard Setting: How to Avoid Loss of Patent Rights. Bruce D. Sunstein 1 Bromberg & Sunstein LLP
Patent Portfolio Management and Technical Standard Setting: How to Avoid Loss of Patent Rights I. The Antitrust Background by Bruce D. Sunstein 1 Bromberg & Sunstein LLP Standard setting can potentially
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21723 Updated August 1, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Trinko: Telecommunications Consumers Cannot Use Antitrust Laws to Remedy Access
More informationUnited States ELEANOR M. FOX AND ROBERT PITOFSKY. Goals of US Competition Policy. Economic and Noneconomic Goals
United States 7 ELEANOR M. FOX AND ROBERT PITOFSKY This chapter provides an overview of US antitrust law, with emphasis on those portions that affect international trade and global competition. In a few
More informationThe Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena
The Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena The rule of reason is designed and used to eliminate anti-competitive transactions from the market. This
More informationOKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 WINTER 2004 NUMBER 4 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OKLAHOMA ANTITRUST LAW
OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 57 WINTER 2004 NUMBER 4 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OKLAHOMA ANTITRUST LAW D. KENT MEYERS * & JENNIFER A. DUTTON ** This Article covers six antitrust topics of interest addressed
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 15-565 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States APPLE, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND
More informationRe: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No
The Honorable Donald S. Clark, Secretary Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20580 Re: In the Matter of Robert Bosch GmbH, FTC File No. 121-0081 Dear Secretary Clark: The
More informationI. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. OVERVIEW OF THE ACT A. Codification... 4 B. Section C. Section D. Exemptions... 5 E. Enforcement...
I. INTRODUCTION... 4 II. OVERVIEW OF THE ACT... 4 A. Codification... 4 B. Section 2... 4 C. Section 3... 5 D. Exemptions... 5 E. Enforcement... 5 III. PRICE DISCRIMINATION UNDER THE ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT...
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS22700 Resale Price Maintenance No Longer a Per Se Antitrust Offense: Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc. Janice
More informationThe Implications Of Twombly And PeaceHealth
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Implications Of Twombly And PeaceHealth
More informationANTITRUST COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR THE MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION
ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR THE MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public,
More informationThe Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation
Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 45 Issue 4 Article 8 1980 The Antitrust Implications of Airline Deregulation Jerry L. Beane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended
More information3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification
3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification In this case the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant violated Title 15, United States Code, Section 1, commonly
More informationFLYING J, INCORPORATED v. J.B. VAN HOLLEN, Attorney General of Wisconsin No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
1 FLYING J, INCORPORATED v. J.B. VAN HOLLEN, Attorney General of Wisconsin No. 09-1883 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT April 14, 2010, Argued September 3, 2010, Decided JUDGES: Before
More informationNational Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and University of Georgia Athletic Association
Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 61 Issue 3 Article 5 June 1985 National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma and University of Georgia Athletic Association Susan
More informationDisaggregation of Damages Requirement in Private Monopolization Actions
Notre Dame Law Review Volume 62 Issue 4 Article 5 1-1-1987 Disaggregation of Damages Requirement in Private Monopolization Actions James R. McCall Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr
More informationDoes Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage?
University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1999 Does Antitrust Have a Comparative Advantage? Frank H. Easterbrook Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles
More information2015 ANTITRUST LAW UPDATE Brad Weber Locke Lord LLP Co-Leader of Antitrust Practice Group January 29, 2016
2015 ANTITRUST LAW UPDATE Brad Weber Locke Lord LLP Co-Leader of Antitrust Practice Group January 29, 2016 Atlanta Austin Boston Chicago Dallas Hartford Hong Kong Houston Istanbul London Los Angeles Miami
More informationLEGAL UPDATE MICROSOFT: EXCLUSIVE DEALING UNDER SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT: A NEW STANDARD? Shannon A. Keyes
LEGAL UPDATE MICROSOFT: EXCLUSIVE DEALING UNDER SECTION 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT: A NEW STANDARD? Shannon A. Keyes I. INTRODUCTION The United States Supreme Court has denied the Justice Department s petition
More informationANTITRUST DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1967 TO 2007
ANTITRUST DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 1967 TO 2007 Leah Brannon Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Douglas H. Ginsburg George Mason University School of Law Competition Policy International,
More informationABA Antitrust Section Fall Forum Legislation: What is Congress Doing?
ABA Antitrust Section Fall Forum Legislation: What is Congress Doing? Moderator: Arthur N. Lerner November 16, 2007 Washington, D.C. Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC Speakers Ivy Johnson, Chief Antitrust
More informationAntitrust Remedy Wars Episode I: Illinois Brick From Inside the Supreme Court
St. John's Law Review Volume 79, Summer 2005, Number 3 Article 1 Antitrust Remedy Wars Episode I: Illinois Brick From Inside the Supreme Court Andrew I. Gavil Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview
More informationCase 1:05-cv JDT-TAB Document 30 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00618-JDT-TAB Document 30 Filed 11/28/2005 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION DANIEL WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. FREE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION,
More informationDevelopment in Competition Law and Policy (Indonesia Progress) *
Development in Competition Law and Policy (Indonesia Progress) * I. Introduction : Since March 5, 1999 the Government of Indonesia has enacted The Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic
More informationCOMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES LAW
COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTIONS OF ANTITRUST LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES LAW December 29, 2017 The views stated in this submission are
More informationTowards a Consistent Antitrust Policy for Unilateral Conduct
theantitrustsource w w w. a n t i t r u s t s o u r c e. c o m F e b r u a r y 2 0 0 9 1 The Antitrust Source, February 2009. 2009 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights
More informationSupreme C~rt. U.S. FILED ~OCT l~2007 ~o. - OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Supreme C~rt. U.S. FILED 07-5 1 ~OCT l~2007 ~o. - OFFICE OF THE CLERK IN THE ~upreme q~ourt of the ~niteb ~tate~ PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY D/B/A AT&T CALIFORNIA, ET AL., Petitioners, V. LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS,
More informationANTITRUST LAW: POLICY AND PRACTICE Fourth Edition
ANTITRUST LAW: POLICY AND PRACTICE Fourth Edition 2013 Supplement C. Paul Rogers III Professor of Law and Former Dean Dedman School of Law Southern Methodist University Stephen Calkins Professor of Law
More informationProtest Boycotts as Restraints of Trade under the Sherman Act: A Proposed Standard
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 1981 Protest Boycotts as Restraints of Trade under the Sherman Act: A Proposed Standard Francis M. Allegra Follow
More informationInternational Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire
International Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire Agency Name: Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Date: October 2009 Refusal to Deal This questionnaire
More informationAN T I T R U S T C H A L L E N G E S T O
Antitrust, Vol. 31, No. 1, Fall 2016. 2016 by the American Bar Association. Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in
More informationA New Chapter in Antitrust Law: The Second Circuit's Decision in United States v. Apple Determines Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy Per Se Illegal
Boston College Law Review Volume 57 Issue 6 Electronic Supplement Article 6 4-7-2016 A New Chapter in Antitrust Law: The Second Circuit's Decision in United States v. Apple Determines Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy
More informationRefusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke, Davis and the Vitality of the Colgate Doctrine
Fordham Law Review Volume 32 Issue 3 Article 5 1964 Refusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke, Davis and the Vitality of the Colgate Doctrine Recommended Citation Refusals to Deal: The Aftermath of Parke,
More informationHorizontal Territorial Restraints And The Per Se Rule
Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Article 12 Fall 9-1-1971 Horizontal Territorial Restraints And The Per Se Rule Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 16-850 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES LIQUIDATION TRUST, BY AND THROUGH ITS LIQUIDATING TRUSTEE, JOHN MADDEN, Petitioner, V. TRINA SOLAR LIMITED; TRINA SOLAR (U.S.),
More informationConstitutional Law -- Sherman Act -- Cross- Elasticity in Determining Percentage of Market Control
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 5-1-1957 Constitutional Law -- Sherman Act -- Cross- Elasticity in Determining Percentage of Market Control Edgar
More informationPatents, Tying and Market Power: The Implications of ITW v. Independent Ink for Antitrust Claims Against IP Owners
Patents, Tying and Market Power: The Implications of ITW v. Independent Ink for Antitrust Claims Against IP Owners Andrew J. Pincus Christopher J. Kelly March 14, 2006 Summary of Seminar The case, the
More informationThe Grinnell Test of Monopolization Sounds a False Alarm: Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
Boston College Law Review Volume 28 Issue 2 Number 2 Article 7 3-1-1987 The Grinnell Test of Monopolization Sounds a False Alarm: Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. David M. Rievman Follow
More informationStandard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword?
MAY 2008, RELEASE ONE Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword? Jennifer M. Driscoll Mayer Brown LLP Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Law Commons
Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 22 Issue 4 1971 Recent Case: Antitrust - Parens Patriae - State Recovery of Money Damages [Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co., 431 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. granted,
More informationCase 3:14-cv JM Document 78 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Case 3:14-cv-00143-JM Document 78 Filed 04/16/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION TRI STATE ADVANCED SURGERY CENTER, LLC, GLENN A. CROSBY
More informationWhat, Never? Well, Hardly Ever : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality, 38 Hastings L.J.
John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1987 What, Never? Well, Hardly Ever : Strict Antitrust Scrutiny as an Alternative to Per Se Antitrust Illegality,
More informationPCI SSC Antitrust Compliance Guidelines
Document Number: PCI-PROC-0036 Version: 1.2 Editor: Mauro Lance PCI-PROC-0036 PCI SSC ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE GUIDELINES These guidelines are provided by the PCI Security Standards Council, LLC ( PCI SSC
More informationTRADE REGULATION: VERTICAL TERRITORIAL RESTRICTIONS UPHELD BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
TRADE REGULATION: VERTICAL TERRITORIAL RESTRICTIONS UPHELD BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR YEARS manufacturers have submitted without litigation to the Government's position that vertical territorial
More informationDaubert Case Summaries
Daubert Case Summaries APPLICATION OF DAUBERT IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT Federal judges often determine the admissibility of expert testimony by applying the Daubert standard, named after Daubert v. Merrell
More informationCleveland State University. Anthony J. Lazzaro
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2004 Monopoly Leveraging in Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, LLP: Why the United States
More informationCleveland State University. Matthew T. Polito
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Journal of Law and Health Law Journals 2002 Can Cleveland Clinic Health System Be Trusted: Whether a Proposed Merger or Acquisition by Cleveland Clinic
More informationThe Scope of the Insurance Industry's Sherman Act Exemption: New Considerations
Boston College Law Review Volume 19 Issue 2 Number 2 Article 3 1-1-1978 The Scope of the Insurance Industry's Sherman Act Exemption: New Considerations Leonard M. Singer Follow this and additional works
More informationCompetition law and compulsory licensing. Professor Dr. juris Erling Hjelmeng Department of Private Law, University of Oslo
Competition law and compulsory licensing Professor Dr. juris Erling Hjelmeng Department of Private Law, University of Oslo The competition rules in brief Regulation of market conduct EU EEA law: Prohibition
More informationAntitrust Immunities
CHRISTINE A. VARNEY* Antitrust Immunities I. The Evolution of Modern Antitrust Analysis... 776 II. Rumors of Type I Errors Have Been Greatly Exaggerated... 778 III. Current Enforcement Transparency Further
More informationChallenges of the New Economy: Issues at the Intersection of Antitrust and Intellectual Property
Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2001 Challenges of the New Economy: Issues at the Intersection of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Robert Pitofsky Georgetown University
More informationLeegin v. PSKS: New Standard, New Challenges
Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 29 January 2008 Leegin v. PSKS: New Standard, New Challenges Ashley Doty Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj
More informationJUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW
March 30, 2017 JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW To Our Clients and Friends: As Judge Neil Gorsuch proceeds through the Senate confirmation process, we are continuing
More informationAntitrust/Intellectual Property Interface Under U.S. Law
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Antitrust/Intellectual Property Interface Under U.S.
More informationIf Per Se Is Dying, Why Not in TV Tying? A Case for Adopting the Rule of Reason Standard in Television Block- Booking Arrangements
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 12 Volume XII Number 1 Volume XII Book 1 Article 5 2002 If Per Se Is Dying, Why Not in TV Tying? A Case for Adopting the Rule of
More informationAntitrust Law and Proof of Consumer Injury
St. John's Law Review Volume 75 Issue 4 Volume 75, Fall 2001, Number 4 Article 4 March 2012 Antitrust Law and Proof of Consumer Injury Robert D. Joffe Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview
More information