IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE JENNIFER DANIEL PERMANENT SECRETARY IN THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
|
|
- Colin Morgan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No CV BETWEEN PAMELA HUNT Claimant AND JENNIFER DANIEL PERMANENT SECRETARY IN THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION HARRILAL SEECHARAN CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER IN THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION THE TEACHING SERVICE COMMISSION THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS OF THE SPIRITUAL SHOUTER BAPTIST FAITH A/C THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS OF THE SPIRITUAL BAPTIST FAITH OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND 1 st Defendant 2 nd Defendant 3 rd Defendant 4 th Defendant MS. ROSEANNE RONDON 1 st Interested Party ARCHBISHOP BARBARA GRAY-BURKE 2 nd Interested Party Page 1 of 12
2 THE COMMITTEE FOR THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS OF THE SPIRITUAL BAPTIST (SHOUTERS) FAITH OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED 3 rd Interested Party Before the Honourable Mr. Justice Robin N. Mohammed Appearances: Mr. Martin G. Daly S.C. and Mr Christopher Sieuchand instructed by Mr Kendell Alexander for the Claimant Mr. Douglas L. Mendes S.C. instructed by Mr Anthony Bullock for the 3 rd Defendant Mr Avory Sinanan S.C. and Ms Donna Prowell instructed by Ms Amrita Ramsook for the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants JUDGMENT I. Background: [1] The Claimant, Pamela Hunt, filed a claim for Judicial Review against the Defendants and Interested Parties seeking several declaratory reliefs that relate to the application for her transfer and/or removal as principal of the St. Barbara s Spiritual Shouter Baptists Primary School (the School ) made on the 3 rd December, 2012 and the decision to commence a formal investigation into several allegations made against her. [2] After the 3 rd Defendant, the Teaching Service Commission (the TSC ), filed its affidavit in response, Pamela applied to withdraw several of the reliefs and in particular, discontinued her entire claim against the TSC. The Court permitted the withdrawal of the claim, however, the parties were in disagreement on the issue of costs and as such, submissions were filed and exchanged. Page 2 of 12
3 [3] A decision on the entitlement of costs for the Claimant s application to withdraw the claim against the TSC was delivered on the 10 th January, 2018, i.e. today s date. [4] At the date of the submissions, the Court had before it only one affidavit in response to the Judicial Review claim, being the affidavit of Veronica Creed on behalf of the TSC. Pamela did not file her supplemental affidavit until the 31 st March, 2015 and, in response, the 2 nd Interested Party, Archbishop Barbara Burke ( Mrs. Burke ) filed hers on the 8 th May, The 1 st and 2 nd Defendants then put in their affidavit of Zorisha Mohammed- Ali on the 14 th May, [5] By an application filed on the 23 rd June, 2015, the Claimant sought to strike out several of the paragraphs of the affidavits of Zorisha Mohammed-Ali on behalf of the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants and that of Mrs. Burke. Pamela s application also sought an order requiring (i) both deponents to attend Court for cross-examination on specific paragraphs of their affidavits; and (ii) specific disclosure of certain letters and documents referred to in each deponent s affidavit. Pamela then sought permission to file affidavits of herself and Archbishop Dorothy Hercules in reply to the affidavits of Mrs. Burke and Zorisha Mohammed-Ali. [6] On the 10 th January, 2018 (today s date), the Court delivered its decision on the above mentioned applications. [7] Evidential objections of the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants were filed on the 31 st July, 2015 seeking to strike out certain paragraphs of Pamela s affidavit and supplemental affidavit of the 15 th July, 2014 and the 31 st March, 2015 respectively. Further, a notice of their intention to oppose her application to cross-examine Zorisha was also filed by the two Defendants on even date. [8] The parties exchanged submissions on the 30 th November, [9] Accordingly, having considered the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants evidential objections and the Claimant s submissions in response, the Court gives its decision as hereunder stated. Page 3 of 12
4 II. Submissions & Analysis: Affidavit of Pamela Hunt filed on the 15 th July, 2014: Paragraph 43, line 1: I was informed by someone at the MOE that Mrs. Gray-Burke was scheduled to meet with the Chief Education Officer (the CEO ) in the MOE. [10] In its application, the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants (the Defendants ) argued that this statement was inadmissible because it did not comply with Part 31.3 of the CPR, was hearsay and/or had no probative value. [11] The Court is not persuaded to rule that this statement is inadmissible on the ground of hearsay. This is a statement made to Pamela by someone from the Ministry of Education. It has long been settled that such statements are admissible to establish not the truth of the statement, but the fact that it was made 1. [12] However, the Court does not find it sufficient for Pamela to disclose, as the source of this information, the fact that someone at the Ministry told her this. This is insufficient to meet the criteria in Part 31.3 (2) of the CPR. Further, Pamela does not proceed to discuss the outcome or importance of this meeting held on the 25 th October, 2013 and therefore the Court does not see the relevance and/or probative value of this statement. [13] Accordingly, paragraph 43, line 1 will be struck off. Paragraph 46, lines 7 11: I considered the letter received from Boynes & Co. to be a part of the committed campaign on the part of the board to have me removed as the principal of the school, which said objective they had made clear to me on several occasions. [14] The Defendants argued that these statements were noncompliant with Part 31.3 of the CPR, were opinion evidence and/or had no probative value. [15] The Court does not agree that Pamela failed to disclose the source or grounds for her belief/opinion that the above letter was part of the campaign against the board to have her removed as principal. At the time of receiving this letter, Pamela had already received a letter from Mrs. Burke, attached as exhibit PH8 to paragraph 40 of her affidavit, 1 Subramanian principle in the case of Subramanian v Public Prosecutor PC WLR 965 at 970. Page 4 of 12
5 complaining about the Rasta man painting in the school, in which it was expressly stated that Pamela would not be confirmed as principal and that a new principal would be appointed. Further, the letter referred to from Boynes & Co. was a pre-action protocol letter. Accordingly, the Court finds that Pamela was justified in expressing her belief. [16] Further, the Court finds that the statements made by Pamela have probative value as they amount to evidence in support of her relief sought against the Defendants for instructing her to vacate her office as principal and/or installing Ms Rondon as the new Acting principal. [17] Accordingly, the Defendants objection to paragraph 46, Lines 7 11 is overruled. Paragraph 57, lines 1 3: I felt intimidated and oppressed by what I considered to be the constant, baseless and unchecked attacks against me being launched by the Board and which were being actively pursued by other parties. [18] The Defendants argued that this excerpt failed to comply with Part 31.3, was inadmissible opinion evidence and/or had no probative value. [19] The grounds for Pamela s belief were clearly and sufficiently disclosed in the preceding paragraphs where she spoke of the many letters she received from the Council of Elders, Mrs. Burke and most recently from one Augustus Thomas attorney-at-law for the Board. Further, these statements by Pamela have probative value as they evidence her state of mind, which would have led her to institute legal proceedings against the Defendants. They also support her reliefs sought against the Defendants on her judicial review claim as they concern the allegations made against her that led to the disciplinary investigation. [20] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 57, lines 1 3 is overruled. Paragraph 65, lines 4 6: with what now appeared to be the complicity of the MOE in acceding to their requests. [21] Based on similar reasoning given in the findings above, the Court finds that Pamela has sufficiently disclosed, by virtue of the preceding paragraphs and exhibited correspondence thereto, the grounds for the belief expressed in this statement. The Court Page 5 of 12
6 therefore disagrees that this statement is inadmissible opinion evidence. Further, the probative value of this statements is that it evidences and/or supports Pamela s decision to seek reliefs against the Defendants as employees of the said MOE. [22] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 65, lines 4 6 is overruled. Paragraph 73, lines 3 5: I expected that they would speak to Mrs Gray-Burke and have her issue a commitment to me not to interfere with the discharge of my duties. To my shock and dismay... [23] The Court does not agree that Pamela failed to sufficiently disclose the grounds of her belief that the SS II Suepaul and Zorisha would have informed Mrs. Burke not to interfere with the discharge of Pamela s duties. [24] In this paragraph, Pamela describes how she expected to resume her duties as principal when the two School Supervisors escorted her to the School s compound that morning. She therefore expected that, when confronted by Mrs. Burke, the supervisors would have instructed Mrs. Burke to allow her onto the compound. The grounds for this belief is contained at paragraph 70 of Pamela s affidavit, where she stated that SS II Suepaul instructed her not to return to the District office the following morning but rather, to report for duty at the School. This suggests that Pamela was of the belief that she would be resuming her position as principal the following day. [25] Notwithstanding the above, the Court does not find much probative value in this statement. Pamela has not sought any reliefs or claims against the Defendants for misleading her or providing false information. [26] Accordingly, paragraph 73, lines 3 5 would be struck off. Paragraph 76: It appeared to me that the MOE was deliberately and purposefully facilitating Mrs Gray-Burke s desires to have me dismissed as the principal of the school. I was deliberately denied access to and custody of my personal property with no lawful cause, I was denied the opportunity to discharge my duties pursuant to my contract of employment, I was denied access to my school s compound for that purpose and my servants and/or agents of the Page 6 of 12
7 ministry, quite apart from taking any action to protect my interests, facilitated and in fact encouraged this action. [27] The Court finds that based on the preceding paragraphs, in particular, paragraphs 73 75, Pamela provided sufficient grounds for her belief that the Ministry of Education was facilitating Mrs. Burke s desires to have her removed as principal. Specifically, the evidence given in those paragraphs that (i) the School Supervisors instructed her to remove her personal belongings (ii) the same supervisors later prevented her from doing same, and (iii) the supervisors then proceeded to install Ms Rondon as the new principal, is, in this Court s opinion, sufficient grounds to justify Pamela s belief that the Ministry was acting on the basis of Mrs. Burke s wishes. [28] Further, this evidence has probative value as it is directly relevant to the reliefs sought against the Defendants, in particular Pamela s challenge to their decision to instruct her to vacate her office as principal and install Ms Rondon as Acting principal. [29] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 76 is overruled. Paragraph 83, lines 3 5: both symptoms which I suspected to be as a result of the recent events described above. [30] The Court finds that Pamela has provided sufficient grounds for her belief that the symptoms of poor sleep and emotional trauma were as a result of the events described. At paragraph 82 she stated that she felt severely oppressed and entertained resignation but only through the support of her friends etc. she found the strength to remain resolute and stay the course. At all times in her affidavit, Pamela described herself as being shocked and distressed by the accusations and actions taken against her. [31] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 83, lines 3 5 is overruled. Paragraph 89, line 1: Despite SSIII Mohammed-Ali s protestations [32] The source and/or grounds for Pamela s statement that SSIII Mohammed-Ali s protested against her desire to take sick leave and attend to her doctor is given in the preceding paragraph 87, where Pamela gave evidence that the said Mohammed-Ali informed her that she would not be allowed to take sick leave as Pamela was on disciplinary action. Page 7 of 12
8 Further, the Court finds that this statement has probative value because it supports her relief sought against the Defendants that they denied Pamela the opportunity to take sick leave 2. [33] The objection to paragraph 89, line 1 is therefore overruled. Paragraph 101, line 1: to my absolute surprise He appeared to be very upset [34] In the first statement, Pamela was expressing her surprise at the fact that SSII Sharma asked her to account for her days of absence from the 26 th May, 2014 from the District Office. The grounds for the belief and/or the basis for this opinion is contained both at paragraphs 97, where Pamela gave evidence that SSIII Mohammed-Ali instructed her to go home, as well as later on in the same paragraph 101. Additionally, Pamela was having an in person conversation with SSII Sharma and therefore is competent to give evidence on his emotional state at that time. [35] However, as no reliefs were sought against SSII Sharma nor is he a deponent in this matter, these statements have no probative value and accordingly, will be struck off. Paragraph 104, lines 4 12 & 19-20: it became more apparent to me that there was a strong possibility that the MOE was intent on having me transferred without my calls had fallen on deaf ears. yet they have consistently acceded to the baseless requests of the Board to have me subjected to unfair investigations [36] The Court finds that the grounds for this belief, that the Ministry was intent on having her transferred, has been sufficiently disclosed by Pamela. [37] In the same paragraph, Pamela referenced a memorandum from Jennifer Daniel, which showed that despite the investigator s finding that no action be taken against Pamela, the said Ms Daniel still asked that consideration be given to her transfer due to the impasse existing between Pamela and the Board. [38] However, the Court does not find any evidence of any calls and/or letters sent by Pamela to the Ministry requesting an investigation into the practices of the Council of Elders in 2 Relief sought at (a) on page 7 of the Claim Form. Page 8 of 12
9 relation to the School s funding and management. Accordingly, Pamela has not disclosed the grounds for her belief that such calls were falling on deaf ears. [39] Accordingly, the words and in respect of whom I made several calls to the MOE for an investigation into their practices It was now patently clear to me that my calls had fallen on deaf ears will be struck off. [40] Further, considering that, at this point, no determination had been made with respect to either the outcome of the disciplinary investigation under Regulation 90 or the application to have Pamela transferred, there has not yet been any basis for Pamela to describe the requests of the Board subjecting her to investigations to be baseless. [41] Accordingly, the word baseless will be struck off. The remainder of this paragraph will be allowed. Paragraph 106, Line 1: I also considered it to be grossly unfair and an act of bad faith [42] The Court finds that Pamela has disclosed the grounds for making these statements against the TSC, particularly, at paragraph 86, which referred to the TSC s letter dated the 14 th February, 2014 annexed as exhibit PH21, where the TSC stated that no allegation of misconduct had been made against Pamela. [43] Further, the Court does find that this statement has probative value considering that one of the reliefs sought against the TSC challenges their decision to institute disciplinary proceedings against Pamela in the absence of any allegations of misconduct or indiscipline 3. [44] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 106, line 1 is overruled. Paragraph 107 in its entirety: [45] The Court agrees that Pamela makes several statements in this paragraph which amount to conclusions to which only this Court is qualified and authorised to give. Given the fact that the TSC had not, at that point, yet made its determination on the investigation nor the application for Pamela s removal, the Court does not find Pamela is entitled to say that 3 Relief sought at (d) at page 4 of the Claim Form. Page 9 of 12
10 she is satisfied/convinced that the TSC and the MOE have done the acts she lists in the paragraph. [46] Accordingly, the part of paragraph 107 that reads I am now satisfied that the MOE and the TSC, far from seeking and/or taking steps... to the end of the paragraph will be struck off. The Supplemental affidavit of Pamela Hunt filed on the 31 st March, 2015: Paragraph 2, line 3: aggressive manner and instructed me. [47] Pamela gave evidence that she spoke with SSII Sharma directly on the phone and therefore, the Court finds she is entitled to comment on the tone of voice and/or disposition of SSII Sharma which she experienced. However, there are no reliefs sought against SSII Sharma and therefore, his manner of speaking is irrelevant and has no probative value to the judicial review claim. [48] Accordingly, the court will strike off the words aggressive manner only from paragraph 2. Paragraph 10: everything after the first sentence. [49] The Court agrees that there is no probative value in these statements concerning the emotional distress and crying experienced by Pamela when told that she had to report to the School again. There is no relief sought which challenges any decision that required Pamela to report to School. To the contrary, Pamela has maintained at all times that her place of work was always the School and not the District office. [50] Accordingly paragraph 10 from the words I was shocked by this. I felt oppressed to the end of the paragraph will be struck off. Paragraph 12, line 3: who was installed as Acting principal in my stead in April [51] This objection is overruled. Pamela had already given evidence at paragraph 75 of her first affidavit of the 15 th July, 2014 that SSIII Mohammed-Ali installed Ms Rondon as Acting principal. This was, in any event, confirmed by Zorisha in her affidavit of the 14 th May, 2015 at paragraph This is therefore not opinion but fact, which Pamela is Page 10 of 12
11 competent to give. Further, it has probative value as it is directly relevant to the reliefs sought again the Defendant. [52] Accordingly, the objection to paragraph 12, line 3 is overruled. Paragraph 21, lines 1-6: the entirety of this paragraph save for the last 2 sentences. [53] The Court finds that the highlighted excerpts of this paragraph, which speak of Pamela s request made to SSIII Mohammed-Ali for school supplies and Zorisha s lack of response, are relevant to the relief sought against the Defendants stated at (x) of the Claim Form at page 8. Further, these statements are evidenced by an exhibit PH52, which contains Pamela s letter requesting school supplies and therefore, this excerpt is in compliance with Part 31.3 of the CPR. [54] Accordingly, this objection is also overruled. III. Disposition: [55] Accordingly, having considered the evidential objections of the 1 st and 2 nd Defendants and the submissions in response by the Claimant, the Court makes the following orders: a. The following paragraphs of the affidavit of Pamela Hunt filed on the 15 th July, 2014 will be struck off: i. Paragraph 43, line 1; ii. Paragraph 73, lines 3 5; iii. Paragraph 101, line 1; iv. Paragraph 104, (i) from the words and in respect of which had fallen on deaf ears. (ii) The word baseless in the last sentence; v. Paragraph 107 from the words I am now satisfied that the MOE to the end of the paragraph. Page 11 of 12
12 b. The following paragraphs of the supplemental affidavit of Pamela Hunt filed on the 31 st March, 2015 will be struck off: i. Paragraph 2, line 3, the words aggressive manner ; ii. Paragraph 10, from the words I was shocked by this. I felt oppressed to the end of the paragraph; Dated this 10 th day of January, 2018 Robin N. Mohammed Judge Page 12 of 12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV NO. 2014-02019 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CHAPTER 7:08 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between AFRICAN OPTION. And DAVID WALCOTT. And BANK OF BARODA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
THE REPUBIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2013-05221 Between AFRICAN OPTION First Claimant And DAVID WALCOTT Second Claimant And BANK OF BARODA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2014-02620 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TERRENCE AND CHARLES Claimant CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE STAFF First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Second
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-003645 BETWEEN MAHARAJ 2002 LIMITED Claimant AND PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
More informationHIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. MABLE PHILLIP (Acting through her Attorney Nancy Mc Kenzie Greene) and CORRINE CLARA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES GRENADA CLAIM NO. GDAHCV 2013/0362 HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MABLE PHILLIP (Acting through her Attorney Nancy Mc Kenzie Greene)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. Before The Honourable Madam Justice Margaret Y. Mohammed
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2017-01989 BETWEEN ZANESHIR POLIAH JOHN POLIAH Claimants AND ZIYAAD AMIN ALSO KNOWN AS ZAIYAD AMIN Defendant Before The Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY Applicant/Intended Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent/Intended
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 44, No. 167, 16th September, 2005
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 44, No. 167, 16th September, 2005 Third Session Eighth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND SUMAIR MOHAN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 45 of 2008 BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPELLANTS AND SUMAIR MOHAN RESPONDENT PANEL: A. Mendonça,
More informationNINETY-SEVENTH SESSION. Considering that the facts of the case and the pleadings may be summed up as follows:
NINETY-SEVENTH SESSION Judgment No. 2324 The Administrative Tribunal, Considering the complaint filed by Mrs E. C. against the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) on 5 March 2003
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2010-05237 BETWEEN MIGUEL REGIS Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honorable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND RULING. that he was a prison officer and that on the 17 th June, 2006, he reported for duty at the
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2010/2501 BETWEEN ELIAS ALEXANDER Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE C.V. 2011/2027 BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS APPLICANTS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE
More informationPOLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2010-01582 BETWEEN SIEULAL RAMSARAN CLAIMANT AND POLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO. 13429 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationThe court may allow a witness to give evidence through a video link or by other
PART 8 : CHAPTER 1: EVIDENCE GENERAL 8.1 Power of court to control evidence (32.1) (1) The court may control the evidence by giving directions as to (c) the issues on which it requires evidence; the nature
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KKRV CONSOLIDATED MARINE SERVICES LIMITED CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-02899 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KKRV CONSOLIDATED MARINE SERVICES LIMITED CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CH.7:08 OF THE LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2010-02389 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CH.7:08 OF THE LAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And. HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00707 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ALVIN And AHYEW Claimant HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-03309 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND Claimant RAMNATH BALLY SHAZMIN BALLY Defendants Before the Honourable Justice Frank Seepersad
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2017-00827 BETWEEN RBC FINANCIAL (CARIBBEAN) LIMITED Claimant AND THE REGISTRATION, RECOGNITION AND CERTIFICATION BOARD Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT AND AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2016-01420 BETWEEN RICKY PANDOHEE CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT AND THE PRESIDENT,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2013-03950 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE In the matter of an Application to enlarge the Estate of Batoolan Mohammed (Deceased) who died on the 24 th January 1979
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2010-04494 BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE Claimant AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION BASDEO MULCHAN LLOYD CROSBY Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MORTGAGE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND STEPHEN ROBERTS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2010-00448/HCA S-2360 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MORTGAGE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND STEPHEN ROBERTS ELIZABETH ROBERTS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV NO. 2010-04129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER COMPLAINTS DIVISION TO INSTITUTE TWO DISCIPLINARY CHARGES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04470 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SEUKERAN SINGH CLAIMANT AND COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SELF HELP LIMITED Defendant JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-00541 BETWEEN NICON & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Claimant AND NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SELF HELP LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00264-CV Dalia Martinez, Appellant v. Daughters of Charity Health Services d/b/a Seton Medical Center, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SOCA FOR PEACE FOUNDATION AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-01845 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SOCA FOR PEACE FOUNDATION APPLICANT AND THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE RESPONDENT Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2016-03157 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1998
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellee
STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION In the matter of: Claimant/Appellant vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-05485 Referee Decision No. 13-43626U Employer/Appellee ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE BOARD OF NURSING
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ON REFERRAL FROM THE BOARD OF NURSING IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) J. DETTE AVALON ) ) Board Case No. 2011-000175 DECISION I. INTRODUCTION This case presents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2017-01878 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DEOWATTIE BAKSH Claimant AND SHAIN STEVEN Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice Robin N. Mohammed Appearances:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015
CLAIM No. 292 of 2014 BETWEEN: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015 IN THE MATTER OF Section 113 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Chapter 91 of the Laws of Belize AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11207-2013 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and JOANNE ELIZABETH COUGHLAN Respondent Before: Mr R. Nicholas
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2011-02975 IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 81:02 IN THE MATTER OF ALL SINGULAR THAT CERTAIN PIECE OR PARCEL OF L COMPRISING
More informationBERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004
BERMUDA 2004 : 32 OMBUDSMAN ACT 2004 Date of Assent: 17 December 2004 Operative Date: 1 May 2005 1 Short title 2 Interpretation 3 Application of the Act 4 Office of Ombudsman 5 Functions and jurisdiction
More informationS18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. a jury found him guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 4, 2019 S18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. Dearies Favors appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial after a jury found him guilty of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV: 2013-04300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAKHPATIYA BARRAN (also called DOWLATIAH BARRAN) CLAIMANT AND BALMATI BARRAN RAJINDRA BARRAN MAHENDRA BARRAN FIRST DEFENDANT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aubin et al v. Columbia Casualty Company et al Doc. 140 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM J. AUBIN, ET AL. VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-290-BAJ-EWD COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2009/1536 BETWEEN JEFFREY JOHN CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2015 01715 Floyd Homer BETWEEN Lawrence John Claimants AND Stanley Dipsingh Commissioner of State Lands Ian Fletcher First
More informationCHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018
CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018 CONTENTS Rule Page PART 1 CITATION, COMMENCEMENT AND POWERS Citation and Commencement Rule 1.1 Definitions Rule 1.2 Application of the Rules Rule 1.3 Effect of non-compliance
More informationTHE COMMISSIONER OF STATE LANDS. Mr Elton Prescott SC leading Mr Phillip Lamont instructed by Mrs Karen Piper for the Claimant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2293/2009 BETWEEN KASSIM MOHAMMED CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE DIRECTOR OF SURVEYS THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE LANDS DEFENDANTS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 113 of 2009 BETWEEN ANTONIO WEBSTER APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No. 120 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN AND. Ms. D. Christopher-Noel; Mr. R. Singh and Ms. G. Jackman instructed by Ms. F.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV. No.2009-02631 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN VERNON AND REID Claimant HER WORSHIP THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE JOAN GILL Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationOrder INQUIRY REGARDING THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA S SEARCH FOR RECORDS
Order 00-04 INQUIRY REGARDING THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA S SEARCH FOR RECORDS David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner February 2, 2000 Order URL: http://www.oipcbc.org/order/order00-04.html
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2010 01117 BETWEEN CRISTAL ROBERTS First Claimant ISAIAH JABARI EMMANUEL ROBERTS (by his next of kin and next friend Ronald Roberts)
More informationIn the Superior Court of Pennsylvania
In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania No. 166 MDA 2008 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAM WAYNE CHAMPAGNE, Appellant. REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT On Appeal from the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RODNEY KHADAROO AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2011-04757 BETWEEN RODNEY KHADAROO AND CLAIMANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Madam
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006 This edition of the Tax Revenue Appeals Act, Cap. 408 incorporates all amendments up to 30th November, 2006
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2009-01582 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
More informationTHE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, Arrangement of Sections
THE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2009 Arrangement of Sections Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Act inconsistent with Constitution 4. Interpretation 5. Section 13 amended 6. Section 15C amended 7.
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION. vs. R.A.A.C. Order No Referee Decision No U Employer/Appellant
In the matter of: Claimant/Appellee STATE OF FLORIDA REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION vs. R.A.A.C. Order No. 13-09253 Referee Decision No. 0008781901-02U Employer/Appellant ORDER OF REEMPLOYMENT
More informationCollege/University Attended Degree Awarded (if any) Years Grade Pt. Average
Teacher Application & Related Questions for Employment at MFCS CONTACT INFORMATION: Name: Mailing Address: Tel: Email: Cell Home POSITION APPLYING FOR: Upper Elementary Public Montessori Teacher Position
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GANGADEEN SEEBARAN AND CHRISTINE SUCHIT STEVE SUCHIT FIRST DEFENDANT CAPITAL INSURANCE LIMITED JOEL BASCOMBE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2009-04028 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GANGADEEN SEEBARAN AND CHRISTINE SUCHIT STEVE SUCHIT CLAIMANT FIRST DEFENDANT CAPITAL INSURANCE LIMITED JOEL BASCOMBE SECOND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-13064-RWZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SIOBHAN WALSH ) ) Plaintiff ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) TELTECH SYSTEMS, INC. ) ) Defendant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. P-186 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P- 190 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 BETWEEN RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationSubject: Pre-Charge Screening APPLICATION OF POLICY INTRODUCTION
Director of Military Prosecutions National Defence Headquarters Major-General George R. Pearkes Building 101 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON K1A 0K2 DMP Policy Directive Directive #: 002/99 Date: 1 March 2000
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between RASHEED ALI OF ALI S POULTRY AND MEAT SUPPLIES. And NEIL RABINDRANATH SEEPERSAD. And *******************
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2013-01618 Between RASHEED ALI OF ALI S POULTRY AND MEAT SUPPLIES Claimant And NEIL RABINDRANATH SEEPERSAD First Defendant
More informationTHE INTEGRITY IN PUBLIC LIFE (AMENDMENT) ACT, Arrangement of Sections
THE INTEGRITY IN PUBLIC LIFE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2010 Arrangement of Sections Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Section 5 amended 4. Section 8 amended 5. Section 9 amended 6. Section 11 amended
More informationTaking Your Complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal. A handout for complainants with carriage
Taking Your Complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal A handout for complainants with carriage July 2013 Taking your complaint to a Human Rights Tribunal: A handout for complainants with carriage The Alberta
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as Abels v. Ruf, 2009-Ohio-3003.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) CHERYL ABELS, et al. C.A. No. 24359 Appellants v. WALTER RUF, M.D., et al.
More informationJUDGMENT NEL A J: [1] This is an application brought on motion in which the. show cause why the termination of the applicant s
1 IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRCA HELD AT DURBAN CASE NO: D/04 In the matter between: ALLEN ZIBUSE ZULU and DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE (KZN) APPLICANT RESPONDENT NEL A J: [1] This is an application
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018
Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Justice: Law Secretary: Secretary: Part Clerk: Hon. Sharon M.J. Gianelli, J.S.C. Karen L.
More informationGrand jury; proceedings and operation in general
September 4, 2014 McKinney's CPL 190.25 190.25 Grand jury; proceedings and operation in general 1. Proceedings of a grand jury are not valid unless at least sixteen of its members are present. The finding
More informationMULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A
MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester Assignment 1 Question 1 If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, CHAPTER 88:01
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT, CHAPTER 88:01 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY OILFIELDS WORKERS TRADE UNION FOR AN INTERIM ORDER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. DANIEL JOHNSON S SCAFFOLDING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-00204 BETWEEN DANIEL JOHNSON S SCAFFOLDING COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND K.G.C. COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable
More information~1!-ff ~ THE PROSECUTOR VERSUS THEONESTE BAGOSORA. Case No. ICTR-96-7-T. International CJ hninal TrHnmal for R d T ~-, wan a
Case No. ICfR-96-7-T UNITED NATIONS (~,.:' ~1!-ff ~ NATIONS UNIES International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Tribunal penal international pour le Rwanda ICTR CRIMINAL REGISTRY RECEIVED l'tqb OEC -1 P S:
More informationOMBUDSMAN BILL, 2017
Arrangement of Sections Section PART I - PRELIMINARY 3 1. Short title...3 2. Interpretation...3 3. Application of Act...4 PART II OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN 5 ESTABLISHMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA No. 34 of 2013 CV No. 03690 of 2011 PANEL: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND
More informationLegal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016
Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No. 45 21st April, 2016 181 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 55 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, CHAP. 12:02 RULES MADE BY THE RULES COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. San Fernando BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON AND AVRIL GEORGE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando Claim No. CV2017-01755 BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON Claimant AND AVRIL GEORGE Defendant Before Her Honour Madam Justice Eleanor J.
More informationRuling On the Application to Strike Out the Re-Amended Claim Form and Statement of Case
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO In the High Court of Justice Claim No. CV2015-01091 CHANTAL RIGUAD Claimant AND ANTHONY LAMBERT Defendant Appearances: Claimant: Defendant: Alexia Romero instructed
More informationBPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18
BPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18 1 Contents Civil litigation and evidence... 4 Introduction... 4 1 General Matters... 5 2 Limitation... 6 3 Pre-action Conduct... 7 4 Commencing Proceedings... 8 5 Parties...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO P.C. SAMAD P.C. PIERRE THIRD DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2007-04365 BETWEEN NIGEL APARBALL ROHIT APARBALL NEIL APARBALL BATCHYA APARBALL CLAIMANTS And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD
STATE OF VERMONT PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY BOARD In Re: Glenn Robinson, Esq. PRP File No. 2013-172 Disciplinary Counsel s Motion in Limine to Admit Statements by Pamela Binette Which Are Contained in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO Claim No: CV2016-01485 VIJAY SINGH Applicant/Intended Claimant AND THE OMBUDSMAN Respondent/Intended Defendant
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2008-02860 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL 1 st Claimant 2 nd Claimant 3 rd Claimant 4 th Claimant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-04598 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL ALAM SELARAS Claimant AND THE OWNERS OF THE VESSEL DIAMOND CAY Defendant Before The Hon. Madam
More informationRules of Procedure and Evidence*
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* Adopted by the Assembly of States Parties First session New York, 3-10 September 2002 Official Records ICC-ASP/1/3 * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationCase 5:11-cv GLS-ATB Document 1 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SYRACUSE DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-01106-GLS-ATB Document 1 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SYRACUSE DIVISION ANTHONY M. SCRO, Plaintiff, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RHONDA TAYLOR. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-00226 Between RHONDA TAYLOR And PRIEST TITRE PRESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ANDY SOOKHOO LATCHMAN BOLA INDUSTRIAL RENTALS LIMITED
More informationIN THE MATTER OF VANESSA GLOVER A person (not being a solicitor) employed or remunerated by a solicitor - AND -
No. 9849-2007 IN THE MATTER OF VANESSA GLOVER A person (not being a solicitor) employed or remunerated by a solicitor - AND - IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Mr A H Isaacs (in the chair) Mr R
More informationReport of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland independent and effective investigations and reviews independent and effective investigations and reviews Index 1. Role of the PIRC
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between MICHAEL PEREZ AND. Before the Honourable Madame Justice Margaret Y Mohammed DECISION
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2009-02764 (formerly HCA 1613/1997) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between MICHAEL PEREZ The Claimant AND BUDDIE MILLER KAMLYN MILLER The Defendants Before
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. LAING SANDBLASTING & PAINTING CO. LTD. Claimant AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2012-00691 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAING SANDBLASTING & PAINTING CO. LTD. Claimant AND DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS LTD Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE
More informationUNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY
COUNSEL TO THE INQUIRY S SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE ON THE REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS ACT 1974 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE INQUIRY S WORK Introduction 1. In our note dated 1 March 2017 we analysed the provisions of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between AINSLEY GREAVES. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2012-02753 Between AINSLEY GREAVES Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando. VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND. SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership)
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando CV. NO. 2006-01349 BETWEEN VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership) Defendant BEFORE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:10-cv-02371-WEB -KMH Document 1 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WANDA HILL ) and DR. ROBIN BOWEN ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) WASHBURN UNIVERSITY,
More informationOrder F12-12 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE. Catherine Boies Parker, Adjudicator. August 23, 2012
Order F12-12 MINISTRY OF JUSTICE Catherine Boies Parker, Adjudicator August 23, 2012 Quicklaw Cite: [2012] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 17 CanLII Cite: 2012 BCIPC No. 17 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/2012/orderf12-12.pdf
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) BETWEEN AND REASONS
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) Claim No: CV 2009-2373 BETWEEN SEAN EVERT DENOON CLAIMANT AND OLIVER SALANDY DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN DUKHARAN DHABAN. And THE PORT AUTHORITY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (PATT)
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2008-01684 BETWEEN DUKHARAN DHABAN CLAIMANT And THE PORT AUTHORITY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (PATT) THE SEAMEN AND WATERFRONT WORKER S TRADE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PRIMNATH GEELAL AND DHAMRAJIE GEELAL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2015-02943 BETWEEN PRIMNATH GEELAL AND DHAMRAJIE GEELAL Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2008-02860 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL 1 st Claimant 2 nd Claimant 3 rd Claimant 4 th Claimant
More information