IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
|
|
- Ralf Gilmore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 81:02 IN THE MATTER OF ALL SINGULAR THAT CERTAIN PIECE OR PARCEL OF L COMPRISING ONE LOT MORE OR LESS FORMING PORTION OF A PARCEL OF L COMPRISING TWO ROODS SITUATE AT BETHEL IN THE PARISH OF ST. PATRICK IN THE ISL OF TOBAGO BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NEW STREET, BETHLEHEM ON THE SOUTH EAST BY OTHER LS OF CAROLINE A. LAWRENCE ON THE WEST BY LS OF ELEASAR KING OR HOWSOEVER OTHERWISE THE SAME MAY BE BUTTED OR BOUNDED MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN DEED REGISTERED AS NO. DE BETWEEN EDWIN MARCELLE (in his own right) First Claimant EDWIN MARCELLE As Lawful Attorney for HARRY MARCELLE, SRA GOPAUL, MARGARET MARCELLE, JOSEPH GRANADO, IMA MARCELLE, JACQUELINE VERNA MARCELLE, CECIL MARCELLE and GLORIA MARCELLE Second Claimant NEVA GUY-MARCELLE Administratrix of the Estate of MARCUS MARCELLE, deceased Third Claimant YVONNE MARCELLE Defendant 1
2 Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes Appearances: Mr. Christo Gift, S.C. Instructed by Mrs. Jocelyn Gift for the First, Second and Third Claimants Ms. Nera Narine Holding for Ms. Rekha Ramjit for the Defendant REASONS THE PROCEEDINGS 1. On the 5 th August 2011, the Claimants filed a Fixed Date Claim Form claiming against the Defendant the following reliefs: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) An order for the partition of All and Singular that certain piece or parcel of land comprising one lot more or less forming part of a parcel of land comprising two roods situate at Bethel in the Parish of St. Patrick in the island of Tobago... more particularly described in deed registered as No. DE ; An Order that the sum found to be due to the Defendant be set off against the sum of $143, taxed costs owing by the Defendant to the Applicant, HARRY MARCELLE, in respect of the said property in H.C.A. No. T-35 of Alternatively, an order for sale in lieu of partition of the said property and that the proceeds of the said sale be divided in the same proportion as their shares and/or interest but subject to the taxed costs outstanding in H.C.A. No. T35 of Alternatively, an order that the Claimants be at liberty to purchase the Defendant s share or interest as determined by the Court. Costs 2. This Claim was supported by a joint affidavit in the names of both claimants also filed on the 5 th August The first hearing of the claim was listed for hearing on the 11 th October 2011 via video conference at 9.00 a.m. 2
3 4. On the 3 rd October 2011 an appearance to the Fixed Date Claim was entered by the Defendant in person in which the Defendant acknowledged receipt of the Claim Form on the 22 nd September 2011 and indicated that she intended to defend the Claim. Of significance to this matter is that on the Appearance Form the following words appear in parenthesis after Question 6, Do you intend to defend the Claim? : (If so you must file a defence or an affidavit within 28 days of the service of the Claim Form on you) 5. On the 11 th October 2011, the hearing of the Claim was dealt with via video conference between 9.03 a.m. to 9.45 a.m. There was no appearance of the Defendant or any Attorney on her behalf during the hearing of the matter. Further, there was no Notice filed by any Attorney in compliance with Rule 65.4 informing the Court that the Defendant was now being represented by an Attorney and that the Claimants Attorneys had been served with a copy of the Notice. After hearing arguments from the Claimants Attorney, I granted an Order in the terms shown on the Order hereto attached. 6. On the 3 rd November 2011 the Defendant applied to set aside the judgment entered in her absence, granting her relief from sanctions under Rule 26.7 and extending the time for filing her affidavit in response to the Claimants application. This application was filed by Mrs. Deborah Moore-Miggins as Attorney-at-Law for the Defendant and was supported by an affidavit in the name of the Defendant filed on same date (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant s principal affidavit. 7. The hearing of this application was fixed for the 23 rd January On the 13 th December 2011, a Notice of change of Attorneys was filed on behalf of the Defendant from Mrs. Moore-Miggins to Rekha P. Ramjit & Associates. On the same date, an Amended Notice of Application was filed together with a supplemental affidavit of the Defendant, (hereinafter referred to as the Defendant s supplemental affidavit ) and an affidavit of Mrs. Moore-Miggins. 9. On the 20 th January 2012 an affidavit in opposition in the name of Renee Gift was filed by the Claimants Attorneys. However, at the hearing on the 23 rd January 2012, Counsel for the Claimants informed the Court that he would not rely on this affidavit since the points made in the affidavit were all legal submissions based on the Civil Proceedings Rules. Accordingly, I proceeded to hear arguments from both sides without reference to this affidavit. 3
4 GROUNDS OF DEFENDANT S APPLICATION 10. By the Amended Notice of Application, the Defendant put forward the following grounds in support of her application: (a) Her affidavit was not due until the 21 st October 2011; (b) Through inadvertence, her affidavit was filed in the wrong proceedings; (c) She filed her appearance on the 3 rd October 2011 and indicated that she intended to defend the Claim; (d) When the Order was made by the Court on the 11 th October 2011 the Claim ought not to have been dealt with pursuant to Part 27.2 (3) since (a) the Defendant had given notice of intention to defend; and (b) no application for summary judgment had been made by the Claimants pursuant to Part 15.4 (1); (e) The Order/Judgment is irregular since (i) on 11 th October 2011 there was no ex parte trial of the claim; (ii) If there was a trial, the same would have been null and void and of no legal effect since there was an express intention to defend the claim; and (iii) summary judgment was not available to the Claimants as there was no application for summary judgment. (f) The Claim was disposed of before the time limited for the Defendant to file an affidavit in response; (g) The Judgment/ Order is oppressive and contrary to the overriding objective; (h) The Defendant has a good reason for failing to attend the hearing; (i) It is likely that had the Defendant attended the hearing, some other judgment or order might have been given or made. 11. At the hearing on the 23 rd January 2012, Attorney for the Defendant, Ms. Narine, made the following significant concessions: (a) (b) (c) The Court was not obliged to adjourn the hearing on the 11 th October 2011 when the Defendant and/or her Attorney failed to appear; The Court had the power to make the Order that it did in the absence of the Defendant; The Defendant was not challenging the making of the Order by the Court. 12. In the light of these concessions, the primary arguments pursued by Ms. Narine were that the Defendant had a good reason for her non-attendance at the hearing on the 11 th October 2011 and 4
5 if she had attended, she would have informed the Court that she intended to defend the matter and the Court may have given a different decision. 13. In answer thereto, Counsel for the Claimants briefly submitted that the Court had the power to grant the Order which it did and the Defendant had failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 40.3 (3) of the Civil Proceedings Rules. 14. At the conclusion of the submissions by both sides, I dismissed the Defendant s Amended Notice of application with costs to be paid by the Defendant to the Claimants, assessed in the amount of $2, My reasons for so doing are set out hereunder. REASONS 15. The claim herein having been instituted by way of Fixed Date Claim Form was listed for hearing on the 11 th October The Defendant was notified of the date of hearing and that if she failed to attend the hearing, judgment may be entered against her. Further, she was notified of the requirement to file an affidavit setting out all the facts on which she relied to dispute the claim, that she must attend the hearing and if she did not, the Judge may deal with the claim in her absence. Therefore, notwithstanding the notation to Question 6 on the Appearance Form, I considered that the Defendant had been duly notified in the clearest terms of the date of hearing and of the need to file her affidavit in time for the hearing and I was of the opinion that the ground of the Defendant s application to the effect that her affidavit was not due until the 21 st October 2011 was without merit. 16. I was of the opinion that the explanation given for the Defendant s and/or her Attorney s failure to attend the hearing was not a good reason for their absence. In my opinion, placing the documents in the hands of her Attorney and focusing on the preparation of an affidavit in reply could not justify the failure of the Defendant to appear at the hearing, bearing in mind the clear and unequivocal language of the notifications contained in the Claim Form as well as the Notes for the Defendant. Even if the Attorney overlooked the date of hearing due to pressure of work, the Defendant ought to have attended since she had been served since the 22 nd September 2011 and she had entered an appearance in person on the 3 rd October By the time the Defendant s Attorney filed the Defendant s affidavit on the 20 th October 2011 in the wrong proceedings, the Order on the hearing of the Fixed Date Claim had already been made 5
6 since the 11 th October Accordingly, I was of the opinion that the fact of the erroneous filing was irrelevant to the issue of why the Order of 11 th October 2011 should be set aside. 18. The mere filing of an appearance on the 3 rd October 2011 indicating an intention to defend the Claim was insufficient. Having regard to the facts alleged by the Claimants in their affidavit filed on the 5 th August 2011 and, in particular, the judgment of the Court in the previous action, H.C.A. T 35 of 2003, the Order for costs made against the Defendant and the withdrawal of the appeal by the Defendant on the 29 th January 2007, it was of critical importance for the Defendant to file an affidavit in response setting out all the facts on which she intended to rely and to appear at the hearing of the Fixed Date Claim. When the matter was called before me on the 11 th October 2011, there was no Attorney on record for the Defendant, an appearance had been entered by the Defendant in person, there was no affidavit in opposition filed on behalf of the Defendant and there was no correspondence from the Defendant explaining her absence. 19. The Defendant, having been served on the 22 nd September 2011, had twenty (20) days notice of the hearing. Under Part 27.2(3), the Court was empowered to deal with the matter in the absence of the Defendant or any affidavit in response. I considered that based on the uncontroverted facts contained in the Claimants affidavit, the Claimants were entitled to the Order sought and that the Claim could be dealt with summarily. In my opinion, it was not necessary for the Claimants to apply for summary judgment since I was satisfied that the Defendant had been served, had been given adequate notice to file an affidavit in opposition and to appear at the hearing. The claim made in the Fixed Date Claim Form was supported by the joint affidavit of the Claimants and in the absence of any affidavit from the Defendant and any explanation for her absence, I proceeded to consider the merits of the Claim. I considered that the Claimants were not entitled to an Order for partition of one lot of land and granted an Order for sale in lieu of partition. Having regard to the order for costs made against the Defendant in the previous proceedings, I also ordered that the proceeds of sale be distributed in the proportions sought, subject to the taxed costs ordered against the Defendant. Accordingly, I rejected the Defendant s application that the Order made on the 11 th October 2011 was irregular, null and void and of no legal effect. 20. In keeping with the overriding objective of the Rules, I considered that in the absence of any affidavit from the Defendant and any appearance of the Defendant at the hearing, the claim should be dealt with expeditiously since, in the face of the undisputed facts alleged by the Claimants, the Defendant appeared to be abusing the process of the Court by her continued 6
7 occupation of the dwelling house on the property to the exclusion of the Claimants and the persons whom they represent. 21. Part 40.3 (3) requires the Defendant to adduce evidence to show: (a) (b) a good reason for failing to attend the hearing; and that it is likely that had the applicant attended some other judgment or order might have been made. In my opinion, both (a) and (b) of this Rule must be satisfied. 22. Having considered the Defendant s principal and supplemental affidavits and the affidavit of Mrs. Moore-Miggins, I was of the opinion that the Defendant s reason for not attending the hearing was not a good reason. Further, I was not persuaded that if the Defendant had appeared some other judgment or order might have been made since the Defendant had not filed an affidavit prior to the 11 th October Further, in the Defendant s principal and supplemental affidavits, she did not depose to any facts to answer the very serious allegations made against her by the Claimants. 23. For these reasons, I dismissed the Defendant s Amended Notice of Application with costs on the 23 rd January Dated the 22 nd day of February, André des Vignes Judge 7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2008-02860 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL 1 st Claimant 2 nd Claimant 3 rd Claimant 4 th Claimant
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2008-02860 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DE VERTEUIL DANIEL VIVET HARRY DOWAGA DANIEL THERESA DANIEL 1 st Claimant 2 nd Claimant 3 rd Claimant 4 th Claimant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CHAPTER 9:01 SECTION 15 AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2017-02448 IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATES ACT CHAPTER 9:01 SECTION 15 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) BETWEEN AND REASONS
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry, Tobago) Claim No: CV 2009-2373 BETWEEN SEAN EVERT DENOON CLAIMANT AND OLIVER SALANDY DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. Cv. 2010-03934 BETWEEN RANDY CHARLES CLAIMANT AND MARION PHILLIPS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES Ms.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2009-01582 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV NO. 2014-02019 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT CHAPTER 7:08 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN ACCORDANCE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-03309 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND Claimant RAMNATH BALLY SHAZMIN BALLY Defendants Before the Honourable Justice Frank Seepersad
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ROBERTO CHARLES AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-02739 Between ROBERTO CHARLES BHAMINI MATABADAL Claimants AND SHASTRI PRABHUDIAL Defendant Before The Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationA & A MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS AND COMPANY LIMITED PETROLEUM COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-01244 BETWEEN A & A MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS AND COMPANY LIMITED CLAIMANT AND PETROLEUM COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV 2009-01049 BETWEEN RUDOLPH SYDNEY CLAIMANT AND JOSEPH THOMAS DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationTHE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT, Arrangement of Sections PART II. OFFICERS 4. Appointment and general powers of officers PART III
THE LAND ADJUDICATION ACT, 2000 Arrangement of Sections Section PART I PRELIMINARY AND APPLICATION 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Minister to declare adjudication area PART II OFFICERS
More informationECONO CAR RENTALS LIMITED GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2013-00852 BETWEEN ECONO CAR RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND CINDY CHARLES GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Co-Defendant NAGICO INSURANCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. P-186 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P- 190 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 BETWEEN RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED
More informationRANDOLPH RUSSELL. 2011: April 20th DECISION
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 227 OF 2008 BETWEEN: THELMA HALL NEE RUSSELL EWART RUSSELL (Attorney on Record
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando. VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND. SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership)
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando CV. NO. 2006-01349 BETWEEN VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership) Defendant BEFORE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND. RAWTI also called RAWTI ROOPNARINE KUMAR ROOPNARINE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 52 of 2012 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND In The matter of All and Singular that certain
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. George Ojar. Narendra Ojar Maharaj. And
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2011 02402 BETWEEN George Ojar Narendra Ojar Maharaj And Claimants Liloutie Deosaran also called Shirley Badal Deosaran also
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-01937 BETWEEN PETER LEWIS CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN AND. Ms. D. Christopher-Noel; Mr. R. Singh and Ms. G. Jackman instructed by Ms. F.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV. No.2009-02631 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Sub-Registry-Tobago) BETWEEN VERNON AND REID Claimant HER WORSHIP THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE JOAN GILL Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2017-02429 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN IN THE MATTER OF THE PARTITION ORDINANCE CHAPTER 27 NO. 14 AND In the Matter of All and Singular that piece
More informationCHESTER CLARKE MARTHE CLARKE. and BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA JULIAN COMPTON. And
., 0 ;..1 1 ( {,.:-!rr e 1 J ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVIL SUIT N0.39 OF 1994 BETWEEN: CHESTER CLARKE MARTHE CLARKE Substituted Plaintiff Added Plaintiff and BANK OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-00772 BETWEEN KELVIN DOOLARIE AND FIELD 1 st Claimant RAMCHARAN 2 nd Claimant PROBHADAI SOOKDEO BISSESSAR 1 st Defendant RAMCHARAN 2
More information(LEGAL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RUTH BURKE, DECEASED) DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RONNIE BOODOOSINGH
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2007-01224 BETWEEN CLARENCE ASHBY CLINTON ASHBY WAYNE ASHBY LYNTON ASHBY CLAIMANTS AND STEPHEN MOSES (LEGAL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN. Between. And WYCLIFFE HACKETT DALTON HACKETT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE M.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV No. 2016-00393 Civil Appeal No. T040/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN Between EARLIN AGARD Claimant And WYCLIFFE HACKETT DALTON HACKETT WENDY BAIRD Defendants
More informationQUIETING TITLES, 1959 CHAPTER 393
QUIETING TITLES, 1959 [CH.393 1 QUIETING TITLES, 1959 CHAPTER 393 QUIETING TITLES, 1959 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Investigation of title by court. 4. Form of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2016-03157 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1998
More informationDisciplinary Committee. Proceedings Rules on Inquiry Hearings
Disciplinary Committee Proceedings Rules on Inquiry Hearings This document sets out the rules governing inquiry hearings conducted by the Disciplinary Committee of the Estate Agents Authority under section
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2010 01117 BETWEEN CRISTAL ROBERTS First Claimant ISAIAH JABARI EMMANUEL ROBERTS (by his next of kin and next friend Ronald Roberts)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-003645 BETWEEN MAHARAJ 2002 LIMITED Claimant AND PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. CV2018-00517 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION BY WINSTON SUTTON (THE SUBJECT OF A WARRANT OF ARREST) FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 51 No. 158, 4th October, 2012
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 51 No. 158, 4th October, 2012 No. 4 of 2012 Third Session Tenth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago SENATE BILL AN ACT for the Incorporation
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. #2010-04494 BETWEEN P.C. CURTIS APPLEWHITE Claimant AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION BASDEO MULCHAN LLOYD CROSBY Defendants BEFORE
More informationIn the High Court of Justice. Port of Spain. Between. Thomas Simon Ramesh Persad Maharaj. First Citizen Bank Taurus Services Limited Harry Ramadhar
Trinidad and Tobago In the High Court of Justice Port of Spain CV2009-04386 Between Thomas Simon Ramesh Persad Maharaj Applicants And First Citizen Bank Taurus Services Limited Harry Ramadhar Defendant
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL ROY FELIX. And. DAVID BROOKS Also called MAVADO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CA No. S 256/2017 Between ROY FELIX And DAVID BROOKS Also called MAVADO Claimant Defendant PANEL: BEREAUX J.A. NARINE J.A. RAJKUMAR J.A. APPEARANCES:
More informationJUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED. Claimant AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2006-02313 BETWEEN D. C. DEVELOPERS LIMITED AND Claimant MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LIMITED Defendant Before The Honourable Mr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) and ERROL MAITLAND
CLAIM NO. GDAHCV1999/0608 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) BETWEEN: DOREEN LALGIE and ERROL MAITLAND Claimant Defendant Appearances: Ms.
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between ANTHONY GROSVENOR. (as Legal Personal Representative of the Estate of Ashton Bailey deceased) ANTHONY GROSVENOR
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2012-01129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ANTHONY GROSVENOR (As the Court appointed Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Olive Duncan Bailey for Olive
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D GALACTIC BUTTERFLY BZ LIMITED. BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice Sonya Young
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2018 CLAIM NO. 547 of 2017 GALACTIC BUTTERFLY BZ LIMITED CLAIMANT AND TAMMY LEMUS PETERSON DEFENDANT BEFORE the Honourable Madam Justice Sonya Young Hearings 2018 23.1.2018
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY- SAN FERNANDO Claim No: CV2016-01485 VIJAY SINGH Applicant/Intended Claimant AND THE OMBUDSMAN Respondent/Intended Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. Cv.2011-00647 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND Claimants NIGEL STELLA JOSEPH GENTLE Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO H.C.A. NO. 1688 OF 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE NATIONAL LOTTERIES CONTROL BOARD FOR LEAVE
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2009-03221 Between HV HOLDINGS LIMITED Claimant And ADELLA HAMID JUNE HAMID TREVOR HAMID Defendants Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVIL SUIT NO. 402 OF 1996 BETWEEN: CLIFTON ST HILL Plaintiff and Appearances: Olin Dennie for the Plaintiff Nicole Sylvester for the Defendant
More informationIN THE MATrER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE MATTER OF THE REFERENDUM (ALTERATION OF THE CONSTITUTION) ACT 2009
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 371 OF 2009 IN THE MATrER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011 CLAIM NO. 816 of 2009 ZENAIDA MOYA FLOWERS MAYOR OF BELIZE CITY CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFENDANT Hearings 2010 28 th October 14 th December 2011 27
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) CONTENTS
CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope of Application and Interpretation 1 Rule 2 Notice, Calculation of Periods of Time 3 Rule 3 Notice of Arbitration 4 Rule 4 Response to Notice of Arbitration 6 Rule 5 Expedited Procedure
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-04009 IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
More information[Assented to 23rd March, 2007]
Fifth Session Eighth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 7 of 2007 [L.S.] AN ACT to provide for the implementation of the Treaty on Security Assistance Among
More informationRuling On the Application to Strike Out the Re-Amended Claim Form and Statement of Case
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO In the High Court of Justice Claim No. CV2015-01091 CHANTAL RIGUAD Claimant AND ANTHONY LAMBERT Defendant Appearances: Claimant: Defendant: Alexia Romero instructed
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19)
COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 1997 (C.I 19) IN exercise of the powers conferred on the Rules of Court Committee by Article 157(2) of the Constitution these Rules are made this 24th day of July, 1997. PART I-GENERAL
More informationThe Labour Court. Workplace Relations Act Labour Court (Employment Rights Enactments) Rules 2016
The Labour Court Workplace Relations Act 2015 Labour Court (Employment Rights Enactments) Rules 2016 These Rules are made pursuant to section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1946 as amended by section
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 37, No. 227, 3rd December, No. 23 of 1998
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 37, No. 227, 3rd December, 1998 No. 23 of 1998 Fourth Session Fifth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago SENATE BILL AN ACT for the
More informationREPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV# 2009-01502 BETWEEN IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF TILKEY GOBIN ALSO CALLED TILKIE GOBIN DECEASED HERAWATI CHARLES CLAIMANT And (1) MONICA JANKEY MADHOSINGH (as Executrix
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE. And DANIEL HARRIGAN
EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CLAIM NO. BVIHCV 143 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) BETWEEN: (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE Respondents/Claimants
More informationANNEX V PROCEDURAL RULES ON CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION OF CONTRACTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (EDF)
ANNEX V PROCEDURAL RULES ON CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION OF CONTRACTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (EDF) I. INTRODUCTION Article 1 - Scope of application. Article 2 - Definitions. Article
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND SUMAIR MOHAN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No: 45 of 2008 BETWEEN THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION APPELLANTS AND SUMAIR MOHAN RESPONDENT PANEL: A. Mendonça,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2017 (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN MARIA MOGUEL AND Claimant/Counter-Defendant CHRISTINA MOGUEL Defendant/Counter-Claimant Before: The Honourable Madame Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV NO. 2010-04129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER COMPLAINTS DIVISION TO INSTITUTE TWO DISCIPLINARY CHARGES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-004233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CHAPTER 35:01 AND
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) APPEAL CASE NO : A5044/09 DATE: 18/08/2010 In the matter between:
IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) APPEAL CASE NO : A5044/09 DATE: 18/08/2010 In the matter between: HENRY GEORGE DAVID COCHRANE Appellant (Respondent a quo) and THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Ashandi Edwards
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE GRENADA SUIT NO. GDAHCV2006/0587 BETWEEN: Ashandi Edwards (By his mother and next friend Alma Edwards) Claimant
More informationCHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Summary Jurisdiction (Appeals) 3 CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. MAKING OF APPEAL 3. (1) Right of appeal. (2) Appeals
More informationThe Rules of the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia
The Rules of the Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia ( Official Journal of the Republic of Serbia, no. 2/2014) I GENERAL PROVISIONS Definition and Status
More information35 No. 5 ] Caribbean Community Treaty on [ Security Assistance Act
35 SAINT LUCIA No. 5 of 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Sections 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Force of law 4. Amendments to Treaty 36 37 I ASSENT [L.S.] PEARLETTE LOUISY, Governor-General. April 19,
More informationBE it enacted by the Governor of Trinidad and. No TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO.
r TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Alien Enemies. No. 6.-1915. 12th March. AN ORDINANCE to amend the Alien Enemies Ordinance, 1914. (No. 37-1914). [L.S.] GEORGE R. LE HUNTE, v'4 ',xrll GOVERNOR. 20th March, 1915.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2017-01240 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. Indra Singh AND Svetlana Dass AND Lenny Ranjitsingh AND Ravi Dass AND Carl Mohammed
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2012-00434 BETWEEN Evelyn Phulmatti Ranjitsingh Joseph Claimant AND Indra Singh AND Svetlana Dass AND Lenny Ranjitsingh
More informationTHE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017
LEGAL NOTICE NO. ARRANGEMENT OF RULES THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017 1 Short title and commencement 2 Interpretation 3 Filing a claim 4 Serving the statement
More informationIN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANGUILLA CIRCUIT (CIVIL) A.D. 2003
CLAIM NO. AXAHCV 2002/20 IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANGUILLA CIRCUIT (CIVIL) A.D. 2003 BETWEEN: SINEL TRUST ANGUILLA LTD. AND Claimant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ANGUILLA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No.: CV2008-03639 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 And IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY STEVE FERGUSON AND ISHWAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN GLORIA ALEXANDER AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2014-00250 BETWEEN GLORIA ALEXANDER AND CLAIMANT PETER ALEXANDER Also called PETER KHAN Also called PETER KELVIN DEFENDANT Before the Honourable
More informationPART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS CONTENTS
PART 8 ARBITRATION REGULATIONS * CONTENTS Section Page 1 Definitions and Interpretations 8-1 2 Commencement 8-2 3 Appointment of Tribunal 8-3 4 Procedure 8-5 5 Notices and Communications 8-5 6 Submission
More informationc t QUIETING TITLES ACT
c t QUIETING TITLES ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference
More informationLAW ON THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION BULGARIA. Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS
LAW ON THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION BULGARIA Prom. SG 60/1988, Amend. SG 93/1993, Amend. SG 59/1998, Amend. SG 38/2001, Amend. SG 46/2002 Chapter I GENERAL PROVISIONS Art. 1. (1) (amend. SG
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV: 2013-04300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAKHPATIYA BARRAN (also called DOWLATIAH BARRAN) CLAIMANT AND BALMATI BARRAN RAJINDRA BARRAN MAHENDRA BARRAN FIRST DEFENDANT
More informationPart 36 Extraordinary Remedies
Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R427-430 Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies Replevin Recovery of personal property 427 In any action brought for the recovery of any personal property and claiming that the property
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA S-851 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ANNETTE RAMLAL (As Legal Personal Representative of the Estate of Curtis Ramlal & Guardian and Next friend of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2008-01078 C.A. No. 126 of 2010 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN LATCHMAN RAMOUTAR C.L. SINGH TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD. Appellants AND LENORE DUNCAN (in her
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And. HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00707 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ALVIN And AHYEW Claimant HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationBASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (BAT) Arbitration Rules. 1 January 2017 Version
BASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (BAT) Arbitration Rules Version BASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL ARBITRATION RULES 0. Preamble 0.1 The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter the "BAT") has been created by
More informationPART 2 MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS
5. Application of Part 2 This Part applies PART 2 MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS to matrimonial proceedings, and for specifying the procedure for complying with the requirements of section 25 of the Act (restriction
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 38, No. 204, 4th November, No. 47 of 1999
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 38, No. 204, 4th November, 1999 No. 47 of 1999 Fifth Session Fifth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago SENATE BILL AN ACT to repeal
More informationTHE RULES, REGULATIONS AND BY-LAWS OF THE HONG KONG BAR ASSOCIATION
THE RULES, REGULATIONS AND BY-LAWS OF THE HONG KONG BAR ASSOCIATION First adopted on 1 March 1968 With amendments up to 14 November 2018 Bar Council Hong Kong Bar Association LG2, High Court 38 Queensway
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 57, No. 84, 28th June, 2018
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 57, No. 84, 28th June, 2018 Third Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 7
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. and
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUIT NO.: 983 of 1996 BETWEEN JOAN BERNADETTE MAINGOT Executrix of the estate of Rose Mary Maingot, deceased Claimant and MONICA DEVAUX Defendant Appearances For
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT, NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY CANSERVE CARIBBEAN LIMITED FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV No. 2009 03446 IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT, NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY CANSERVE CARIBBEAN LIMITED
More informationGENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS
PRACTICE DIRECTION PART 44 DIRECTIONS RELATING TO PART 44 GENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS SECTION 7 SOLICITOR S DUTY TO NOTIFY CLIENT: RULE 44.2 7.1 For the purposes of rule 44.2 client includes a party for
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RODNEY KHADAROO AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2011-04757 BETWEEN RODNEY KHADAROO AND CLAIMANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Madam
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO P.C. SAMAD P.C. PIERRE THIRD DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2007-04365 BETWEEN NIGEL APARBALL ROHIT APARBALL NEIL APARBALL BATCHYA APARBALL CLAIMANTS And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 39, No. 208, 27th October, 2000
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 39, No. 208, 27th October, 2000 Fifth Session Fifth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 84
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-04233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CHAPTER 35:01 AND
More informationSalvino Steel Iron v. Safeco Ins Co Amer
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-23-2006 Salvino Steel Iron v. Safeco Ins Co Amer Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-1449
More informationStrata Titles CAP
LAWS OF TURKS & Revision Date: 31 Aug 2009 Strata Titles CAP. 9.04 27 [Subsidiary Legislation] STRATA TITLES REGULATIONS ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS REGULATION 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Registrar
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BRIAN MOORE. And PUBLIC SERVICES CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-03257 BETWEEN BRIAN MOORE Claimant And PUBLIC SERVICES CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationPurpose The Organization is established to operate for charitable purposes and shall devote its resources to charitable activities. Article 3.
CANADIAN SERBIAN HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION MALI SVET KANADA FOUNDING BY-LAWS Apr.28.2017 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES (CONSTITUTION) PREAMBLE 1. To establish humanitarian aid to underprivileged children, orphans,
More information