IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT AND AND
|
|
- Homer Holt
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV BETWEEN RICKY PANDOHEE CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT AND THE PRESIDENT, GENERAL SECRETARY, FINANCE OFFICER, TRUSTEES AND MEMBERS OF THE PRISON OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (SECOND DIVISION) AND SECOND NAME DEFENDANT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION INTERESTED PARTY Before the Honourable Madame Justice Margaret Y. Mohammed Dated the 17 th March 2017 APPEARANCES: The Claimant not appearing and being unrepresented. Ms. Corine Findley and Ms. Theophilus instructed by Ms. Laura Persad Attorneys at law for the First Defendant. Mr. Anthony Bullock Attorney-at-Law for the Second Defendant. Ms. Kelisha Bello Attorney-at-Law for the Interested Party. Page 1 of 13
2 REASONS 1. On the 13 th December 2016 ( the order ) I struck out the Claimant s claim against the First Named Defendant and I ordered the Claimant to pay the First Named Defendant s costs to be assessed in default of agreement. I now set out my full reasons for making the order. 2. The Claimant was enlisted in the Trinidad and Tobago Prison Service and appointed a Prison Officer I on the 2 nd August Sometime between 1995 and 2014 the Claimant acquired his Legal Education Certificate. On the 1 st July 2015 the Second Named Defendant agreed to appoint and retain the Claimant as its full time legal officer. By letter dated the 30 th October 2015 the Second Named Defendant terminated the Claimant from his position as its legal officer but the Claimant was only served with the letter on the 21 st December On the 7 th December 2015 the Claimant applied to the Commissioner of Prisons ( the Commissioner ) for all his vacation leave of 140 days but at the time of the institution of the instant he was not receipt of a response. 3. By letter dated the 18 th January 2016 the Claimant wrote a pre-action protocol letter to the Commissioner and copied to the Minister of Labour, the Chairperson of the Interested Party and the Registrar General. 4. On the 28 th January 2016 ( the DPA letter ) the Director of Personnel Administration ( the DPA ) responded to the aforesaid pre-action protocol letter which was addressed to the Commissioner. The DPA letter stated that the Commissioner had informed the DPA that the Claimant had been absent without official leave since the 1 st October 2015 and that the Commissioner had Page 2 of 13
3 recommended that the Claimant be declared to have resigned his posts in accordance with regulation 49 of the Public Service Commission Regulations. The DPA also indicated to the Claimant that the payment of salary and allowances do not fall under the purview of the Service Commissions Department and that such matters should be addressed to the Commissioner and/or the Minister of National Security. 5. At paragraph 3 of the Statement of Case the Claimant averred that the First Defendant is sued pursuant to the State Liability and Proceedings Act Chapter 8:02 since it is liable for acts and/or omissions by the servants and or agents of the State including the Ministry of National Security and the Commissioner. At paragraph 4 of the Statement of Case he averred that the Second Named Defendant is the recognised Association to represent Prison Officers and Prison Service Drivers under the Prison Service Act Chapter 13:02. The Claimant did not set out the basis for joining the Interested Party. 6. In paragraphs 13 to 18, paragraphs 23 to 25 and paragraphs 39 to 45 of the Statement of Case the Claimant alleged breaches of his expressed and implied terms of his contract of employment by the First Named Defendant. The Claimant also alleged constructive dismissal by the First Named Defendant at paragraphs 46 to 49 of the Statement of Case. 7. In particular at paragraph 26 of the Statement of Case the Claimant alleged that it was an implied duty of his contract of employment between the Claimant and First Named Defendant for the latter to pay him. At paragraph 44 of the Statement of Case, the Claimant alleged that in breach of the First Named Defendant s duty to act in accordance with section 14 of the Prison Services Act and rules 5 and 20 of Page 3 of 13
4 the Prison Services Regulations and rule 110(1) of the Public Service Commission Regulations the First Named Defendant stopped paying the Claimant his salary and has imposed a penalty not contained in the Prison Services Act or Prison Service Regulations. At paragraph 42 the Claimant alleged that the First Named Defendant breached its duty to pay the Claimant as an employee his salary and allowances for December 2015, January 2016, February 2016 and March The Claimant also alleged at paragraph 41 of the Statement of Case that in breach of the First Named Defendant s duty to act in good faith towards the Claimant as an employee, the Commissioner failed to acknowledge that the Claimant was seconded to the Second Defendant at least until 30 th October 2015 and as such he could not have been deemed to be absent without leave since October At paragraph 43 of the Statement of Case the Claimant alleged that the First Named Defendant s agent, the Commissioner declared the Claimant absent without leave since 1 st October 2015 and recommended and/or caused the Interested Party to commence absent without leave proceedings against him purportedly inn accordance with regulation 49 of the Public Service Commission Regulations. 9. The Claimant alleged at paragraph 37 of the Statement of Case, that at the time of the institution of the instant claim no disciplinary proceedings were commenced against him and it has not been declared that he has been absent without leave. 10. At paragraph 45 of the Statement of Case the Claimant alleged that The actions of the First Named Defendant is procedurally incorrect and the decision is unlawful, unreasonable, breach of natural justice and entitles the Claimant to apply for Judicial Review. Page 4 of 13
5 11. The substantive relief which the Claimant was seeking in his Claim Form filed on the 29 th April 2016 against the First Named Defendant were: I. A Declaration that the conduct of the First Named Defendant through his servants and /or agents made in December 2015 to stop payments of the Claimant s salary and allowances is a breach of the Claimant s contract with the First Named Defendant and a breach of the Public Service Regulations. II. A Declaration that the conduct of the First Named Defendant through his servants and/or agents made in December 2015 to stop payments of the Claimants salary and allowances and failure of the First Defendant to inform him of the initiation of proceedings under section 49 of the Public Service Commission Regulations against him and to act in accordance with the implied and express terms of contract and the Public Service Act and the Public Service Regulations, the Prison Service Act and Regulations amounts to a repudiatory breach of contract entitling the Claimant to deem his contract with the First Defendant terminated. III. Damages for constructive dismissal from such office or post on and from the 30 th day of October, IV. Special damages for salary and allowances for the period December 2015 to March 2016 and continuing. V. An Order for the First Named Defendant to effect payment of all entitlements and emoluments with retroactive effect as an employee of the First Named Defendant. VI. Exemplary Damages for the harsh and oppressive conduct of the First Named Defendant in breaching the terms of the Claimant s employment. VII. Interest pursuant to Section 25 (1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Chapter 4:01. VIII. Costs. Page 5 of 13
6 IX. Such further or other relief as the Honourable Court may deem just and/or expedient. 12. The reliefs which the Claimant is seeking against the Second Named Defendant are: X. A Declaration that the conduct of the Second Named Defendant through his servants and/or agents made in December 2015 to stop payments of the Claimant s allowances is void and a breach of the Claimant s contract with the Second Named Defendant; XI. A Declaration that the Claimant was at material times a member of the Second Named Defendant and entitled to the rights and privileges of membership of the Second Named Defendant; XII. A Declaration that the conduct of the Second Named Defendant through his servants and/or agents made in December 2015 to exclude the Claimant from the premises of the Second Named Defendant and in preventing him from exercising the rights and privileges of membership is void; XIII. Damages for wrongful dismissal as Legal Officer of the Second Named Defendant on and from the 30 th day of October, 2015 and for conspiracy and for inducing a breach of contract by the First Named Defendant; XIV. An injunction restraining the Second Named Defendant through its servants and/or agents from excluding the Claimant from the Second Defendant s premises or preventing him from exercising the rights and privileges of membership; Page 6 of 13
7 XV. An Order for the First Named Defendant to effect payment of all entitlements and emoluments with retroactive effect; XVI. Special damages for allowances for the months August 2015 and September 2015 and the period December 2015 to March 2016 and continuing; XVII. Exemplary Damages for the harsh and oppressive conduct of the Second Named Defendant in breaching the terms of Claimant s contract and unlawful exclusion; XVIII. Interest pursuant to Section 25 (1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Chapter 4:01; XIX. XX. Cost; Such further or other relief as the Honourable Court may deem just and/or expedient. 13. On the 28 th July 2016 the First Named Defendant filed an application ( the application ) seeking to strike out the Claimant s Claim Form and Statement of Case pursuant to Part 26.2(1)(c) of the Civil Proceedings Rules 1998, as amended ( the CPR ) on the basis that the Statement of Case disclosed no grounds for bringing a claim against the First Named Defendant. It also asked that the Claimant s Claim Form and Statement of Case be struck out pursuant to Part 26.2(1)(b) of the CPR as it constituted an abuse of the process; or in the alternative, that the First Named Defendant be granted an extension of time for filing its Defence pending the hearing and determination of the application and that the Claimant do pay to the First Named Defendant the costs of this application, to be assessed in default of agreement. Page 7 of 13
8 14. The grounds of the application were: i. The First Named Defendant is not the employer of the Claimant and there exists no contract of employment between the First Named Defendant its servant/agents and the Claimant. ii. The alleged decision of the Commissioner and/or the Interested Party naturally involve public law issues which the Claimant has not challenged. iii. Complaints of breach of the rights of natural justice are properly brought in the context of judicial review proceedings and not tort proceedings; and iv. The remedies sought cannot be obtained against the First Named Defendant as the alleged decision of the Commissioner and/or the Interested Party has not been set aside. v. There is therefore no cause of action disclosed on the pleadings as the Claimant has no viable claim for breach of contract given these circumstances. vi. The Claimant s claim is therefore misconceived as it ought to have been brought as a judicial review and not as an action for breach of an employment contract. This course of action is an abuse of the process of the Court, as a result of which these proceedings must be dismissed. vii. There are no grounds for defending this claim as the Claimant on his own pleading has abandoned his work. 15. In support of the application Counsel for the First Named Defendant submitted that the claim as pleaded by the Claimant contains allegations against the Second Named Defendant and the Interested Party. However, there is no nexus between the First Named Defendant and the Claimant since the latter has not pleaded that the First Named Defendant is responsible for the actions of the Commissioner Further the relief which the Claimant is seeking against the First Named Page 8 of 13
9 Defendant is he is challenging decisions of the Commissioner and the Interested Party. There has been no abandonment proceedings brought by the Interested Party against the Claimant. Even if the Claimant had been declared to have abandoned his job, abandonment is not a dismissal or termination therefore there is no cause of action for dismissal or wrongful termination. The declarations which the Claimant seeks against the First Named Defendant concern public law issues and such relief are not appropriate in private law. 16. The hearing of the application was scheduled for 10:45 am but when the matter was called at 11:01 am Counsel for the Claimant was not present and there was no explanation for his absence. He appeared later in the day after I had made the order. 17. The Court s power to strike out a statement of case is set out in Part 26.2 (1) of the CPR which states: 1. The court may strike out a statement of case or part of a statement of case if it appears to the court: a. that there has been a failure to comply with a rule, practice direction or with an order or direction given by the court in the proceedings; b. that the statement of case or the part to be struck out is an abuse of the process of the court; c. that the statement of case or the part to be struck out discloses no grounds for bringing or defending a claim; or d. that the statement of case or the part to be struck out is prolix or does not comply with the requirements of Part 8 or 10. Page 9 of 13
10 18. Abdulai Contej C.J. in Belize Telemedia Limited v Magistrate Usher 1 considered the interaction between striking out under the court s case management powers under Part 26 as: 15. An objective of litigation is the resolution of disputes by the courts through trial and admissible evidence. Rules of Court control the process. These provide for pre-trial and trial itself. The rules therefore provide that where a party advances a groundless claim or defence or no defence it would be pointless and wasteful to put the particular case through such processes, since the outcome is a foregone conclusion. 16. An appropriate response in such a case is to move to strike out the groundless claim or defence at the outset. 17. Part 26 of the powers of the Court at cases management contains provisions for just such an eventuality. The case management powers conferred upon the Court are meant to ensure the orderly and proper disposal of cases. These in my view, are central to the efficient administration of civil justice in consonance with the overriding objective of the Rules to deal with cases justly as provided in Part 1.1 and Part 25 on the objective of case management. 19. I decided to strike out the Claimants action against the First Named Defendant for the following reasons. 20. Firstly, there was no cause of action for breach of contract by the First Named Defendant as disclosed in the pleadings. The Claimant pleaded that the First Named Defendant was the Claimant s employer. According to paragraph 1 of the Statement of Case the Claimant was permanently employed as a Prison Officer in the Trinidad and Tobago Prison Service. Section 3 of the Prison Services Act sets 1 (2008) 75 WIR 138 Page 10 of 13
11 out the structure of the Prison Service and Section 7 of the Prison Service Act sets out the terms and conditions of employment for Prison Officers. In essence, there was no provision which stated that the First Named Defendant was the Claimant s employer. 21. Secondly, the Claimant s complaints appeared to be against certain decisions by the Commissioner and his cause of action if any was in public law and not tort proceedings in private law. On the face of the averments in the Statement of Case, it appeared to me that the Claimant s complaints were against certain decisions of the Commissioner and the Second Named Defendant. The Claimant s complaints against the Commissioner were the Commissioner s failure to respond to his request for 140 days vacation leave which the Claimant made on the 7 th December 2015; the Commissioner s decision to inform the DPA that the Claimant had been absent without official leave since the 1 st October 2015; the Commissioner s recommendation that the Claimant be declared to have resigned his post in accordance with regulation 49 of the Public Service Commission Regulation; the Commissioner s failure to recognised his alleged secondment to the Second Named Defendant and the Commissioner s decision to cease payment of the Claimant s salary since December The Claimant complaints against the Second Named Defendant were related to the latter s decision to terminate him from the post of Legal Officer. 23. In my opinion, if the Claimant was not satisfied with the decisions of the Commissioner the more appropriate course would have been to seek relief in the public law and not private law. Indeed at paragraph 45 of the Statement of Case, referred to aforesaid, the Claimant recognised even before he filed the instant action Page 11 of 13
12 that his remedies were in judicial review proceedings since his complaints were against decisions of the Commissioner and the nature of his complaints concerned the procedural correctness of the said decisions. 24. In any event, the relief sought by the Claimant against the First Named Defendant cannot be obtained since any alleged decisions against the Commissioner and/or the Interested Party have not been set aside. 25. Thirdly, even if there was a nexus between the Claimant s complaint against the Commissioner and the First Named Defendant, the Claimant admitted at paragraph 37 of the Statement of Case that no disciplinary proceedings had been commenced against him by the First Named Defendant and he has not been declared absent without leave. Yet at paragraph 69 of the Statement of Case he pleaded that the abandonment proceedings by the First Named Defendant was procedurally irregular, ultra vires, unreasonable and in breach of the rules of natural justice. 26. In Brian Bisnath v the Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago 2 the claimant was a police officer who brought an action in private law for breach of contract and wrongful dismissal since the Commissioner of Police had declared that the said claimant had abandoned his post. Boodoosingh J in striking out the claim was of the view that the claimant s cause of action was not based on a contractual relationship between the parties but on the administrative act of the Commissioner of Police in declaring that the claimant had abandoned his office. 2 CV Page 12 of 13
13 27. There was no pleading that a decision was made by the First Named Defendant to declare that the Claimant had abandoned his office. The proper body to convene those proceedings against the Claimant was the Interested Party and there was no pleading that this process had been invoked. In this regard, any complaint by the Claimant with respect to the recommendation by the Commissioner to the DPA appeared to be premature and an abuse of process. 28. Lastly, the Court had the power to convert an ordinary claim to continue as one for an administrative order under Part 56.6 of the CPR or section 13 of the Judicial Review Act Chapter 7:08. Part 56.6 (1) provides: This rule applies where a claimant issues a claim for damages or other relief other than an administrative order but where the facts supporting such claim are such that the only or main relief is an administrative order. 29. I did not think it was appropriate to do so in the instant case since the Claimant intentionally abused the process of the Court by filing the instant proceedings. He acknowledged at paragraph 45 of the Statement of Case that his remedy was in judicial review proceedings; he acknowledged at paragraph 37 of the Statement of Case that no disciplinary proceedings had been commenced against him and he has not been declared absent without leave; and at paragraph 17 of the Statement of Case he acknowledged that it was the Interested Party which is bestowed with the power to declare an officer absent from duty under regulation 49 of the Public Service Commission Regulations.... Margaret Y Mohammed Judge Page 13 of 13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2017-01240 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KKRV CONSOLIDATED MARINE SERVICES LIMITED CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-02899 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN KKRV CONSOLIDATED MARINE SERVICES LIMITED CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2016-02038 BETWEEN NIGEL PASCAL DASS INDAR SOOKDEO MARISSA SOOKDEO Claimants AND PRAKASH SUKDEO also known as PRAKASH SOOKDEO MERLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between AINSLEY GREAVES. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2012-02753 Between AINSLEY GREAVES Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2013-03950 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE In the matter of an Application to enlarge the Estate of Batoolan Mohammed (Deceased) who died on the 24 th January 1979
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE AD of an application for leave to apply for Judicial Review NORMAN CHARLES RODRIGUEZ
CLAIM NO 275 OF 2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE AD 2014 IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to apply for Judicial Review AND IN THE MATTER of section 13 of the Belize City Council Act, Cap 85
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CA No. 34 of 2013 CV No. 03690 of 2011 PANEL: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN DOC S ENGINEERING WORKS (1992) LTD DOCS ENGINEERING WORKS LTD RAJ GOSINE SHAMDEO GOSINE AND
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between PAUL CHOTALAL. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2014-00155 Between PAUL CHOTALAL Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND RULING. that he was a prison officer and that on the 17 th June, 2006, he reported for duty at the
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2010/2501 BETWEEN ELIAS ALEXANDER Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE RODNEY KHADAROO AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2011-04757 BETWEEN RODNEY KHADAROO AND CLAIMANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Madam
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2015 01715 Floyd Homer BETWEEN Lawrence John Claimants AND Stanley Dipsingh Commissioner of State Lands Ian Fletcher First
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 113 of 2009 BETWEEN ANTONIO WEBSTER APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No. 120 of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D BT TRADING LIMITED GEORGE POPESCU ALPHA SERVICES LIMITED
CLAIM NO. 325 OF 2014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2014 BETWEEN: KEVIN MILLIEN Claimant AND BT TRADING LIMITED GEORGE POPESCU ALPHA SERVICES LIMITED 1 st Defendant 2 nd Defendant 3 rd Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. San Fernando BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON AND AVRIL GEORGE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE San Fernando Claim No. CV2017-01755 BETWEEN MCLEOD RICHARDSON Claimant AND AVRIL GEORGE Defendant Before Her Honour Madam Justice Eleanor J.
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST.
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2012/006 BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST and Appellants [1] THE DIRECTOR
More informationECONO CAR RENTALS LIMITED GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2013-00852 BETWEEN ECONO CAR RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND CINDY CHARLES GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Co-Defendant NAGICO INSURANCE
More informationNorthern Iron Creditors' Trust Deed
Northern Iron Creditors' Trust Deed Northern Iron Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) Company James Gerard Thackray in his capacity as deed administrator of Northern Iron Limited (Subject
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2010 01117 BETWEEN CRISTAL ROBERTS First Claimant ISAIAH JABARI EMMANUEL ROBERTS (by his next of kin and next friend Ronald Roberts)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D SECOND TIME LIMITED. KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill )
CLAIM NO. 222 OF 2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015 BETWEEN: SECOND TIME LIMITED Claimant AND KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill ) Defendant In Court. BEFORE: Hon. Chief Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2012-00772 BETWEEN KELVIN DOOLARIE AND FIELD 1 st Claimant RAMCHARAN 2 nd Claimant PROBHADAI SOOKDEO BISSESSAR 1 st Defendant RAMCHARAN 2
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-003645 BETWEEN MAHARAJ 2002 LIMITED Claimant AND PAN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED Defendant
More informationConsolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Public Assistance (Amendment) (Guernsey) Law, 1990 [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE
PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED The Public Assistance (Amendment) (Guernsey) Law, 1990 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE This consolidated version of the enactment incorporates all amendments listed in the footnote below.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV NO. 2010-04129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER COMPLAINTS DIVISION TO INSTITUTE TWO DISCIPLINARY CHARGES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between KERN COOKE. And POLICE CONSTABLE ADRIAN TOUSSAINT. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO.
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. C.V. 2015-00531 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between KERN COOKE And POLICE CONSTABLE ADRIAN TOUSSAINT And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claimant
More informationSURREY TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION. Certificate of Incorporation No.: S CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS
SURREY TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION Certificate of CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS CONSTITUTION ARTICLE I - NAME The name of the Association shall be the "SURREY TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION" (hereinafter referred to as "This
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2017-02046 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO RAPHAEL MOHAMMED AND THE COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS CLAIMANT FIRST DEFENDANT AND THE ATTORNEY
More informationChild (Amendment) 1 A BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend the Child Act 2001.
Child (Amendment) 1 A BILL i n t i t u l e d An Act to amend the Child Act 2001. [ ] ENACTED by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows: Short title and commencement 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Child
More informationJUDICIAL REMEDIES IN PUBLIC LAW
LITIGATION LIBRARY JUDICIAL REMEDIES IN PUBLIC LAW by Clive Lewis Barrister, Middle Temple WlTH A FOREWORD BY THE RT. HON. LORD JUSTICE LAWS LONDON SWEET & MAXWELL 2000 Foreword Foreword to First Edition
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2014-02620 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TERRENCE AND CHARLES Claimant CHIEF OF THE DEFENCE STAFF First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Second
More informationConstitution. The Banking and Financial Services Law Association Limited. A company limited by guarantee and not having share capital
Constitution The Banking and Financial Services Law Association Limited A company limited by guarantee and not having share capital version: 10 August 2014 44 Martin Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia 61
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2016-03157 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPLY FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO PART 56.3 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1998
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MORTGAGE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND STEPHEN ROBERTS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2010-00448/HCA S-2360 of 2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MORTGAGE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED Claimant AND STEPHEN ROBERTS ELIZABETH ROBERTS
More informationHIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION. No. 249/Rules/DHC Dated:
HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI NOTIFICATION No. 249/Rules/DHC Dated: 29.05.2012 Whereas the High Court of Delhi, by way of amendments, proposes to introduce / amend the existing Rules in various Orders
More informationThe Convention which the provisions of the present Chapter modify is the Warsaw Convention as amended at The Hague in 1955.
PROTOCOL TO AMEND THE CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR, SIGNED AT WARSAW ON 12 OCTOBER 1929, AS AMENDED BY THE PROTOCOL DONE AT HE HAGUE ON 28 SEPTEMBER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2017 (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN MARIA MOGUEL AND Claimant/Counter-Defendant CHRISTINA MOGUEL Defendant/Counter-Claimant Before: The Honourable Madame Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationTOWN OF WINDSOR BYLAW # 29 FIRE CHIEF and SERVICES BY-LAW
TOWN OF WINDSOR BYLAW # 29 FIRE CHIEF and SERVICES BY-LAW TITLE 29.01 This Bylaw is entitled Bylaw 29, and may be cited as the Fire Chiefs and Services Bylaw. DEFINITIONS 29.02 In this Bylaw, unless there
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN YVONNE ROSE MARICHEAU. And MAUREEN BHARAT PEREIRA. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2013-01568 BETWEEN YVONNE ROSE MARICHEAU And Claimant MAUREEN BHARAT PEREIRA And First Defendant RICARDO PEREIRA Second Defendant
More informationIN RELATION TO THE CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL. October Page
CONSOLIDATED TEXT OF THE AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL AND THE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IN RELATION TO THE CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL October
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2009-02981 BETWEEN PHILLIP QUASHIE CLAIMANT AND THE CHIEF FIRE OFFICER PROPOSED DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-01937 BETWEEN PETER LEWIS CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-03309 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PADMA DASS AND Claimant RAMNATH BALLY SHAZMIN BALLY Defendants Before the Honourable Justice Frank Seepersad
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Civil Appeal No. P-186 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P- 190 of 2016 Claim No. CV 04374 of 2015 BETWEEN RAIN FOREST RESORTS LIMITED
More informationFINANCIAL AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS AUTHORITY OF SASKATCHEWAN BILL. No. 39
FINANCIAL AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS 1 BILL No. 39 An Act respecting the Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan and making consequential amendments to other Acts TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Preliminary
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between MOOTILAL RAMHIT & SONS CONTRACTING LIMITED. And EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES COMPANY LIMITED
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2017-02302 Between MOOTILAL RAMHIT & SONS CONTRACTING LIMITED Claimant And EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES COMPANY LIMITED First Defendant
More informationMUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT
MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS ACT CHAPTER 11:24 Act 39 of 1997 Amended by 7 of 2001 14 of 2004 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 76.. 1/ L.R.O. 2 Ch. 11:24 Mutual
More informationCOQUITLAM MINOR LACROSSE ASSOCIATION
COQUITLAM MINOR LACROSSE ASSOCIATION - 1 - CONSTITUTION 1. The name of the Society is the "Coquitlam Minor Lacrosse Association" and the Society shall hereafter be referred to as the "Society". 2. The
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE C.V. 2011/2027 BETWEEN RUBY THOMPSON-BODDIE LENORE HARRIS APPLICANTS AND THE CABINET OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENTS BEFORE THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2013-004233 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ACT NO. 60 OF 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CHAPTER 35:01 AND
More informationTHE RULES THE MACHRIHANISH GOLF CLUB. Revised at the AGM on
THE RULES Of THE MACHRIHANISH GOLF CLUB Revised at the AGM on 01.04.2016 The club shall be called THE MACHRIHANISH GOLF CLUB, and shall be primarily devoted to the Game of Golf and shall be a non-profit
More informationItaly International Extradition Treaty with the United States
Italy International Extradition Treaty with the United States October 13, 1983, Date-Signed September 24, 1984, Date-In-Force 98TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, April
More informationcourt of appeal rules
court of appeal rules TABLE OF CONTENTS Court of Appeal 1 Title PART I Title and Interpretation 2 Interpretation Part II Purpose and Application of the Rules 3 Purpose of rules 4 Application of the rules
More informationPage 1 of 17 Attorney General International Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.N.B. 2011, c. 176) Act current to March 7, 2012 2011, c.176 International Commercial Arbitration Act Deposited May 13, 2011 Definitions
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND SOUTHERN SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED DECISION
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-04568 BETWEEN LYDIA SUMINTRA BICKRAM Claimant AND SOUTHERN SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY LIMITED Defendant Before: Master Margaret Y Mohammed
More informationIN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED. (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2010-01442 IN THE MATTER OF CLICO INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED (In Compulsory Liquidation) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, CHAP 81:01
More informationREVISED AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE TRUST FUND. The Parties to the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice:
REVISED AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE TRUST FUND The Parties to the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice: Cognisant that the Court is indispensable for the good
More informationMESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
BILATERAL EXTRADITION TREATIES JAMAICA EXTRADITION TREATY WITH JAMAICA TREATY DOC. 98-18 1983 U.S.T. LEXIS 419 June 14, 1983, Date-Signed MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING THE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. Cv.2011-00647 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN BETWEEN CHANDRAGUPTA MAHARAJ MAIANTEE MAHARAJ AND Claimants NIGEL STELLA JOSEPH GENTLE Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN REPUBLIC BANK OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO. Alvin Pariaghsingh appearing Mr. Beharry instructed by Anand Beharrylal
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No: CV: 2009-02354 BETWEEN LUTCHMAN LOCHAN TARADATH LOCHAN AND ASHKARAN JAGPERSAD REPUBLIC BANK OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO First Claimant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between MOOTILAL RAMHIT AND SONS CONTRACTING LIMITED. And EDUCATION FACILITIES COMPANY LIMITED [EFCL] And
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2017-02463 Between MOOTILAL RAMHIT AND SONS CONTRACTING LIMITED Claimant And EDUCATION FACILITIES COMPANY LIMITED [EFCL] And
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAW DAKOTA COMMUNITY CENTRE INC. (hereinafter called the "Centre"). ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES
AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAW DAKOTA COMMUNITY CENTRE INC. (hereinafter called the "Centre"). ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES 1.01 The purpose and undertaking of the Centre shall be as set forth in its
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2011 CLAIM NO. 816 of 2009 ZENAIDA MOYA FLOWERS MAYOR OF BELIZE CITY CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFENDANT Hearings 2010 28 th October 14 th December 2011 27
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MOHANLAL RAMCHARAN AND CARLYLE AMBROSE SERRANO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-02646 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MOHANLAL RAMCHARAN AND Claimant CARLYLE AMBROSE SERRANO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE JUDITH JONES Appearances:
More informationPART I-ESTABLISHMENT, OBJECT AND FUNCTIONS OF THE GHANA AIDS COMMISSION PART II-ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF COMMISSION
GHANA AIDS COMMISSION ACT, 2002, (ACT 613). ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I-ESTABLISHMENT, OBJECT AND FUNCTIONS OF THE GHANA AIDS COMMISSION Section 1. Establishment of the Commission 2. Object and functions
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD & TOBAGO) LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2014-00133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PRIME EQUIPMENT RENTALS LIMITED Claimant AND ANAND SINGH Defendant AND THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY (TRINIDAD
More informationPROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE REGIONAL JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION PREAMBLE
PROTOCOL ON THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES OF THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE REGIONAL JUDICIAL AND LEGAL SERVICES COMMISSION PREAMBLE Whereas paragraph 2 of Article VI of the Agreement Establishing
More informationJustice Marvin A. Zuker ONTARIO SMALL CLAIMS COURT PRACTICE
Justice Marvin A. Zuker ONTARIO SMALL CLAIMS COURT PRACTICE Practice Advisor June 28, 2013 Below please find a comprehensive collection of updates to the legislative provisions that have been amended since
More informationCOLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY COUNCIL. ARTICLE I Authority
COLUMBIA-GREENE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BYLAWS OF THE FACULTY COUNCIL ARTICLE I Authority The faculty s role in formulation of College policy is stated in the SUNY Board of Trustees, Code of Standards for Community
More informationA BILL. i n t i t u l e d. An Act to amend the Labuan Offshore Trusts Act 1996.
A BILL i n t i t u l e d An Act to amend the Labuan Offshore Trusts Act 1996. [ ] ENACTED by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows: Short title and commencement 1. (1) This Act may be cited as the Labuan
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando. VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND. SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership)
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Sub-Registry, San Fernando CV. NO. 2006-01349 BETWEEN VSN INVESTMENTS LIMITED Claimant AND SEASONS LIMITED (In Receivership) Defendant BEFORE
More informationCHAPTER 315 TRADE MARKS ACT
CHAPTER 315 TRADE MARKS ACT Act Subsidiary Legislation ACT Act No. 46 of 2003 Amended by Act No. 50 of 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Preliminary 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation.
More informationDownloaded on April 16, Region. Sub Subject Conventions Reference Number
Downloaded on April 16, 2019 Convention, Supplementary to the Warsaw Convention, for the Unification of Certains Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air Performed by a Person Other than the Contracting
More informationArticle I. Article II
CONVENTION SUPPLEMENTARY TO THE WARSAW CONVENTION FOR THE UNIFICATION OF CERTAIN RULES RELATING TO INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR PERFORMED BY A PERSON OTHER THAN THE CONTRACTING CARRIER, SIGNED IN GUADALAJARA,
More informationThe overriding objective.. Rule 1.1 Application of the overriding objective by the court Rule 1.2 Duty of parties.rule 1.3
Contents of this Part PART 1 OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE OF THESE RULES The overriding objective.. Rule 1.1 Application of the overriding objective by the court Rule 1.2 Duty of parties.rule 1.3 The overriding
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2016-00756 BETWEEN CANDICE MAHADEO Claimant AND GEISHA MAHADEO NIRMAL MAHADEO Defendants Before the Honourable Madam Justice Margaret
More informationSOA Bylaws Approved by the SOA Board of Directors, October 2017
SOA Bylaws Approved by the SOA Board of Directors, October 2017 Article I Name and Offices Article II Purposes Article III Membership Article IV Meetings of the SOA Article V Board of Directors Article
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2011/4632 BETWEEN VERNON BARNETT CLAIMANT AND THE PROMOTION ADVISORY BOARD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANTS BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationThe Royal Court Civil Rules, 2007
O.R.C. No. IV of 2007 The Royal Court Civil Rules, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES Rule PART I The overriding objective 1. Statement and application of overriding objective. PART II Service of documents 2. Service
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROMOTION MISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE UNIÃO AFRICANA African Commission on Human & Peoples Rights Commission Africaine des Droits de l Homme & des Peuples 31 Bijilo Annex Layout, Kombo North District, Western
More informationADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. Judgement No. 1498
United Nations AT/DEC/1498 Administrative Tribunal Distr. Limited 23 December 2009 Original: French ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Judgement No. 1498 Case No. 1621 Against: The Commissioner-General of the United
More informationSouth Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998
South Africa Domestic Violence Act, 1998 Africa Legal Aid Accra The Hague Pretoria ACT To provide for the issuing of protection orders with regard to domestic violence; and for matters connected therewith.
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationINSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS RWANDA INTERNAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS RWANDA INTERNAL RULES AND REGULATIONS FORWARD... vii SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION... 1 Article One: Purposes... 1 Article 2: Definitions... 1 SECTION 2: GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATED TO
More informationEnforcement Rules for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Tentative translation)
Enforcement Rules for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (Tentative translation) This is an English translation of the Enforcement Rules for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2012-00877 Between BABY SOOKRAM (as Representative of the estate of Sonnyboy Sookram, pursuant to the order of Mr. Justice Mon
More information(b) The Chair may make any amendments to the draft agenda as they see fit. (a) The Annual Meeting will take place within the following periods:
PART 4 RULES OF PROCEDURE COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURE RULES Part 1 Format and Content of Meetings 1 BUSINESS OF COUNCIL MEETINGS (a) The agenda and timings for items of business for any Council Meeting shall
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01303 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between DOREEN ALEXANDER-DURITY Applicant/Intended Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent/Intended
More informationRULES OF WAIUKU NETBALL CENTRE INCORPORATED
RULES OF WAIUKU NETBALL CENTRE INCORPORATED 1. NAME The name of the Centre shall be The Waiuku Netball Centre Incorporated, hereinafter referred to as The Centre. 2. OBJECTS The Objects of the Centre are:
More informationTHE MUHAMMAD SUBUH FOUNDATION BYLAWS
THE MUHAMMAD SUBUH FOUNDATION BYLAWS Article I GENERAL PURPOSE Section 1. The purpose of The Muhammad Subuh Foundation (the "Foundation"), a Commonwealth of Virginia non-stock corporation, is to operate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TONY ALLISTER HOLDER AND FRANKIE PATADEEN. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO H.C.A. No. 3864 of 1993 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TONY ALLISTER HOLDER Plaintiff AND FRANKIE PATADEEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO Defendants BEFORE: THE
More informationACT 656 LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE ACT, 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Establishment of the Local Government Service
Local Government Service Act, 2003 LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICE ACT, 2003 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Establishment of the Local Government Service SECTION 1. Establishment of the Local Government Service. 2.
More informationBYLAWS OF LUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA, INCORPORATED (A Maryland Non-Stock Corporation) (Case for Change proposed amendments: Draft #3)
BYLAWS OF LUTHERAN SERVICES IN AMERICA, INCORPORATED (A Maryland Non-Stock Corporation) (Case for Change proposed amendments: Draft #3) ARTICLE I NAME, REGISTERED AGENT Section A. Name. The name of the
More informationGOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN LAW DEPARTMENT
GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN LAW DEPARTMENT THE RAJASTHAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY (AMENDMENT) ACT, 1963 (ACT NO. 21 OF 1968) Published By Authority Government Central Press, Jaipur 1 [First Published in Rajasthan
More informationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BARBADOS ORGANIZATIONS, INC. CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BARBADOS ORGANIZATIONS, INC. CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS DRAFT 05/20/2005 DRAFT 01/10/2005 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS Article I Identification 4 Article II Goals
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-00349 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN VICARDO GONSALVES CLAIMANT AND CHAN PERSAD DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES Appearances: For the Claimant:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2014 CLAIM NO. 242 OF 2014 BETWEEN: BELIZE ELECTRICITY LIMITED Claimants/Respondents AND RODOLFO GUITIERREZ. Defendant/Applicant Before: Hon. Mde Justice Shona Griffith
More informationNumber 28 of 1973 GENOCIDE ACT, 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. 3. Extradition and evidence for foreign courts.
Genocide Act, 1973 Number 28 of 1973 GENOCIDE ACT, 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Definition. 2. Genocide. 3. Extradition and evidence for foreign courts. 4. section 169 of Defence Act, 1954.
More informationTHE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE BILL, 2003 EXPLANATORY NOTE
THE CARIBBEAN COURT OF JUSTICE BILL, 2003 EXPLANATORY NOTE (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) The purpose of the Bill is to give certain Articles
More informationUNIT TRUST CORPORATION AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RONNIE BOODOOSINGH REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2012-03240 BETWEEN UNIT TRUST CORPORATION CLAIMANT AND RICHARD WOODRUFFE DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RONNIE BOODOOSINGH
More information