IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se ) ) Defendant.
|
|
- Bridget Lambert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV ) ) Plaintiff, pro se ) ) vs. ) COMPLAINT ) HANNAH BRACKETT, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 725 NORTHPOINT AVE., ) LIBERTY, MO ) ) Defendant. ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff Ahmed Salau, pro se, for his complaint alleges as follows:
2 NATURE OF THE CAUSE This is an action for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of defamatory Statements made by the Defendant about Defendant s dealings with Plaintiff. As detailed herein, Plaintiff is entitled to actual damages, compensatory and punitive damages, damages for pain and suffering as a result of Defendant s actions, exemplary damages, special damages and other damages. All events giving rise to Plaintiff s cause of action occurred in Missouri, such that Missouri substantive law applies to Plaintiff s claims. Plaintiff requests a jury decide these claims. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1332(a). Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or actions giving rise to Salau s claims arose in this district. Salau has incurred harm in this district as a result of Brackett s tortious conduct, and Brackett expressly aimed her tortious conduct at this district.
3 THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, Ahmed Salau is a natural person and is a resident of Princeton, West Virginia. Plaintiff majored in chemistry and psychology and had a minor in women and gender studies. Plaintiff is also a professional research associate, co-author, co-investigator on a number of ongoing scientific projects that have been published in peer-reviewed journals published by reputable organizations like the American Chemical Society among others. Plaintiff also had another job as a student customer service assistant at the University of Missouri Campus Dining Services. Plaintiff was also involved and/or is a member of numerous groups on campus including but not limited to STOP TRAFFIC, BAPTIST STUDENT UNION, ON THE ROCK, AUTISM SPEAKS, PSI CHI, THE FOOD BANK, GREEN DOT, Foundation for the International Medical Relief of Children (FIMRC),among other organizations. Plaintiff is also the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of PARIS Angels a mentoring program for at-risk youth. 2. Defendant, Hannah Brackett is a natural person and is a resident of Liberty, Missouri.
4 STATEMENT OF FACTS 3. On or about Friday, September 7 th 2012, Plaintiff exchanged numerous text messages with Defendant. 4. In one of the text messages, Plaintiff and Defendant agree to meet on Saturday, September 8 th 2012 in the afternoon to attend the football game. 5. On Saturday, September 8 th 2012, at/or about 3pm, Plaintiff text messages Defendant that she has arrived on campus and she is ready to be picked up. 6. At/or about 3:15pm, Defendant arrives at Plaintiff s dormitory in company of five of his friends and meet with Plaintiff and two of her friends as they head towards one of Defendant s friend s tailgate. 7. On the way to the Defendant s friend s tailgate, one of the group members Defendant s friend Abby Corkins (hereinafter Abby) recognizes a friend from her University Rowing Team at a different tailgate and we all went with her. 8. The group never made it to Plaintiff s friend s tailgate. 9. While at Abby s friend s tailgate, some members of the group left early for the football game while other members stayed and had alcoholic beverages.
5 10. At/or about a half hour from our arrival at Abby s friend s tailgate, everyone at the house headed towards the stadium to join the festivities. 11. The members of our group decided to go to Lot X to check out the view and join the rest of the tailgaters at the top level. 12. Some members of the group did not have tickets so at/or about an hour after our arrival at Lot X, the group dispersed with Plaintiff, Abby, and Defendant going to the football game together. The time was about 5:30pm. 13. The group stayed at the football game until the game was decided at/or about 9pm. 14. The group subsequently headed towards the residence halls where Abby headed back to her room. 15. Defendant and Plaintiff proceeded to head downtown to get some food and for some dancing. 16. While downtown, Defendant and Plaintiff go to The Blue Fuque Bar (hereinafter called the bar). 17. Defendant and Plaintiff showed their identification cards to get into the bar. 18. Defendant and Plaintiff ordered drinks and listened to a live band play. 19. At/or about 10pm, Defendant grew bored of the band since they were a crappy band so Defendant and Plaintiff both played several games of Ping-Pong before leaving the bar.
6 20. Defendant and Plaintiff left the bar and proceeded to the speaker s circle on campus to complete one of the University rituals. 21. Defendant and Plaintiff finished the ritual, shared a few kisses and headed away from the speaker s circle. 22. On the way back to the Defendant s dormitory, Defendant and Plaintiff talked about a previous conversation they had about Chinese tradition, history and Government. During this conversation, Plaintiff s collection of Chinese books and artifacts came up and an excited Defendant requested to check them out. 23. When Defendant and Plaintiff arrived at Plaintiff s office, Defendant checked out the Chinese lore for a few minutes before requesting that the Plaintiff change the music because she did not like the country music that was playing. Plaintiff then subsequently changed the music to The Beatles. 24. Defendant and Plaintiff began to dance to The Beatles and subsequently kissed and had consensual intercourse. 25. After intercourse, they departed Defendant s office as Plaintiff proceeded to walk Defendant back to Defendant s dormitory. Upon arrival at Defendant s dormitory, Defendant invites Plaintiff in and swipes him in the building. Defendant requested to take the stairs up to her room in order to avoid detection by her Residence Assistant.
7 26. This revelation troubled Plaintiff so he questions Defendant as to why she was trying to avoid her Residence Assistant to which she responds that her Residence Assistant is always nosy and she wanted to avoid coming in contact with her. 27. Upon arrival at Defendant s room, Plaintiff s roommate Rachel Ouellette (hereinafter called Rachel) is laying on the bed asleep. Defendant and Plaintiff subsequently kiss and have intercourse as they fell asleep in Defendant s bed. 28. On Sunday, September 9 th 2012, at/or about 9am, Defendant and Plaintiff wake up, get dressed, and head downtown for breakfast at Ernie s café. 29. During breakfast, Defendant and Plaintiff had general conversations about politics, and the large number of patrons present for breakfast with their server Brooke. During breakfast, Defendant bragged about owning and using a fake identification card which she showed Plaintiff. 30. Plaintiff noticed a friend of his Peter Conn (hereinafter called Peter) come in to meet his parents as they took the seat next to Plaintiff and Defendant s. 31. After finishing breakfast, Plaintiff paid for both meals and acknowledged Peter and his parents as he and Defendant left Ernie s café.
8 32. While Defendant and Plaintiff were walking back, Defendant asked Plaintiff if he was clean to which Plaintiff responded in the affirmative even adding that he was a regular blood and plasma donor for the Red Cross. 33. When Defendant and Plaintiff arrived at Defendant s dormitory they bade each other goodbye. 34. At/or about 5pm on Sunday, September 9 th, 2012, Plaintiff was conducting research at his office in the Chemistry Building when the University Police Department came to inquire about an incident that occurred in an office in the Chemistry Building. 35. Plaintiff co-operated with the University Police Department and went down to the Police Station to talk about it. 36. Plaintiff was interrogated for a few hours and was escorted back to his Office for a search of his Office. 37. Plaintiff complied with the search and detectives confiscated Plaintiff s computer, phones, memory card, among other items for analysis. 38. On/or about Tuesday, September 11 th, 2012, Defendant applies for an Order of Protection against Plaintiff in which she falsely, states as fact that the Plaintiff stalked her, got her drunk, and raped her. 39. On/or about Tuesday, September 25 th, 2012, Plaintiff received information from the University Office of Student Conduct that they had received a report stating as facts that Plaintiff, continued to
9 give alcohol to a person in a drunken state, provided alcohol to a minor, got her into the bar, had nonconsensual sexual behavior with a person all attributed to Defendant. 40. On/or about Wednesday, September 19 th, 2012, Plaintiff s Advisor in the Women and Gender Studies Department learns about the incidents. 41. On/or about Friday, September 28 th, 2012, Plaintiff s Advisor in the Chemistry Department and Principal Investigator on his research projects Dr. Rainer Glaser (hereinafter called Chemistry Advisor) learns about the incidents. 42. On/or about 5:10pm on September 26 th, 2012, Plaintiff attends a previously scheduled Stronger against relationship and sexual violence (STARS) event called What is a Clothesline Project? 43. On/or about September 26 th, 2012, Plaintiff finds out that Defendant has continued to state as facts her distorted, false, and diabolical version of the events to the public knowledge of everyone at the STARS Program and at the Relationship and Sexual Violence Prevention (RSVP) thereby sharing this information with third parties.
10 44. On/or about Wednesday, October 3 rd, 2012, Plaintiff received information from the University Office of Student Conduct summarily expelling him and permanently separating him from the University. 45. On/or about Thursday, October 4 th, 2012, at about 5pm Plaintiff was working at the Rollins Dining Hall when Defendant showed up at his work station and called him a rapist loud enough for third parties to hear. 46. Plaintiff subsequently alerted a co-worker to witness the incident that followed. 47. Defendant got on the phone to call the University Police Department to try to get Plaintiff arrested for violating an Order of Protection. 48. During the ensuing incidents, Plaintiff alerts his supervisor Jeffrey J. Lee (hereinafter called supervisor) to these incidents. 49. At/or about 5:30pm, the Defendant continues to state as fact that the Plaintiff raped her. These utterances were loud enough for Plaintiff s friends to hear her and loud enough for Defendant s co-workers to hear her. 50. Plaintiff s supervisor advises him that Plaintiff would no longer work at Rollins Dining Hall and that we would try to find you another location. 51. On/or about 9:53am, Friday, October 5 th, 2012, Plaintiff is notified by his Supervisor that,...this morning we received word from our administration that we have to terminate you
11 52. On/or around, Friday, October 5 th, 2012, Plaintiff noticed that his access to the Chemistry Building had been restricted and that his key card could not access it. 53. On/or about 2:30pm on Wednesday, October 10 th, 2012, Plaintiff is approached by Detective Kingsbury after Plaintiff s Women and Gender Studies meeting with Plaintiff s Women and Gender Studies Advisor. 54. On/or about 2:30pm on Wednesday, November 28 th, 2012, Defendant continued to repeat her false and disproved defamatory statements at Room 232, Memorial Union North at the University of Missouri. 55. Plaintiff is informed by Detective Kingsbury that he is barred from the Hudson/Rollins/Gillette Residence Halls and Dining Hall for a period of One Year. Plaintiff is further informed that he has been expelled. 56. Several members of STOP TRAFFIC and Women and Gender Studies students have heard Defendant s Statements. 57. Several members of Plaintiff s church The Baptist Student Union have heard Defendant s Statements. 58. Several co-workers and supervisors have heard Defendant s Statements. 59. Plaintiff s Advisors have heard Defendant s Statements. 60. Members of PSI CHI have heard Defendant s Statements. 61. Members of Green Dot have heard Defendant s Statements.
12 62. Members of On the Rock have heard Defendant s Statements. 63. Plaintiff never stalked or attempted to stalk Defendant at any time. 64. Plaintiff never provided alcohol to minor. 65. Plaintiff never provided alcohol to Defendant in a drunken state. 66. Plaintiff never got her into the bar with regards to Defendant. 67. Plaintiff never engaged in nonconsensual sexual behavior with Defendant. 68. Plaintiff never raped Defendant. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation) 68. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 67 as if fully set forth at length herein. 69. Defendant s Statements and publications described herein (hereinafter called Statements) concerned Plaintiff and were false. 70. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 71. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
13 72. Defendant s Statements were slanderous per se because they injure Plaintiff s professional reputation. 73. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 74. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 75. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 76. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a
14 result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation) 77. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 76 as if fully set forth at length herein. 78. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false as a matter of fact. 79. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 80. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
15 81. Defendant s Statements were slanderous per se because they injure Plaintiff s personal reputation. 82. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 83. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 84. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 85. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In
16 addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City and community of Columbia. Defendant s statements permanently damage Plaintiff s reputation in Missouri and all over the world. Plaintiff will soon have to leave the world of academia and will likely face difficulties in obtaining employment at another university as a result of Defendant s false and defamatory statements. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct) 86. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 85 as if fully set forth at length herein.
17 87. Defendant s statements concerned Plaintiff and were false. 88. Defendant s statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 89. Defendant s statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice. 90. Defendant s statements were slanderous per se because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct. 91. Defendant s statements accused Plaintiff of engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of Corrections. 92. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 93. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 94. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was
18 impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 95. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
19 FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander By Implication) 96. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 95 as if fully set forth at length herein. 97. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory. 98. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 99. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant has no reasonable grounds for believing the truth of her Statements Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs.
20 103. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
21 FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Reckless Disregard/Malice) 105. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 104 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept
22 refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while my judgment was impaired contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and the Defendant s subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies program at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
23 SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation) 113. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 112 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant s Statements were libelous per se because they injure Plaintiff s professional reputation Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and
24 inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation)
25 122. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 121 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false as a matter of fact Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant s Statements were libelous per se because they injure Plaintiff s personal reputation Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling
26 my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City and community of Columbia. Defendant s statements WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
27 EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct) 131. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 130 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s statements concerned Plaintiff and were false Defendant s statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice Defendant s statements were libelous per se because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct Defendant s statements accused Plaintiff of engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of Corrections Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs.
28 139. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
29 NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel By Implication) 141. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 140 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant has no reasonable grounds for believing the truth of her Statements Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs.
30 148. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
31 TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Reckless Disregard/Malice) 150. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 149 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was
32 impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
33 ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 158. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 157 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements and conduct were extreme and outrageous. So outrageous as to shock any marginally literate person s sensibilities Defendant s Statements and conduct have caused Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional stress Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he stalked me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he kept refilling my drinks at the bar and raped me while me judgment was
34 impaired, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant knew and intended that Plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress as a result of her Statements and conduct. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, special damages, exemplary damages and injunctive relief that the Defendant refrain from further defaming Salau and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. Respectfully submitted, Ahmed Salau Plaintiff Pro Se P O Box 6008 Princeton, WV Phone) Fax) ahmed@ahmedsalau.com Dated Princeton, West Virginia November 24 th, 2014.
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV 24740. ) Plaintiff, pro se ) vs. ) COMPLAINT CONSTANCE AGREGAARD,
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding
More informationPage 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JACKIE M. CLARK, C.A. No.: 2018-CP-23- Plaintiff, vs. SUMMONS SARAH ( SALLY WARWICK AND DAVID TIMOTHY
More information4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and
4:15-cv-04028-SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Friday, 13 March, 2015 05:01:04 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION
More informationCase 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:15-cv-01413 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JONATHAN TURNER; v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT TEXAS
More informationCourthouse News Service
0 0 A. James Clark, #000 CLARK & ASSOCIATES S. Second Avenue, Ste. E Yuma, AZ Telephone ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE HAWKEY, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION
JANE DOE, v. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff, YAHKHAHNAHN AMMI, Serve at: 9821 E 60th Street #7 Kansas City, MO 64133 Defendant. PETITION Case No. Division JURY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
More informationPLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION
FILED 2/4/2019 9:59 AM Mary Angie Garcia Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Victoria Angeles 2019CI02190 CAUSE NO.: DEREK ROTHSCHILD IN THE DISTRICT COURT as Next Friend of D.R. v. BEXAR COUNTY,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI SALLY G. HURT, City, State, ZIP And SUSAN G. HURT, City, Street, ZIP Case No. Division Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE Serve at: City, State, Zip Defendant.
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF OCONEE Jane Doe, vs. Plaintiff, Oconee Memorial Hospital, Greenville Heath System, Defendants. TO THE DEFENDANTS ABOVE-NAMED: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL
More informationCOMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..
More informationSTATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON)
STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION BRYAN ANTHONY REO 7143 Rippling Brook Ln. Mentor, OH 44060 Case No. Hon. Plaintiff, V. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST CHRISTIAN/ARYAN NATIONS OF MISSOURI
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ERICA N. STEWART PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO.: TAROLD DURHAM and BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT (JURY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CYNTHIA HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 01-3144-ODS ) NEW PRIME, INC. d/b/a/ PRIME, INC. ) Serve Registered
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) DAWN M. ST ALEY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS FILE NO.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF RICHLAND DAWN M. ST ALEY, Plaintiff, vs. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMONS FILE NO. 2018-CP-40- JIM STERK, Defendant. TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: I I ' ' YOU ARE
More information2:13-cv GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:13-cv-14350-GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN VINCENT WORTMANN Plaintiff vs Case No:2:13-cv-14350 Judge: HON. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
ELG/mjw 12/08/05 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GERALD PRICE CASE NO.: 5:04 CV 2070 228 28 TH STREET NW BARBERTON, OHIO 44203 JUDGE DOWD Plaintiff, vs. PLAINTIFF
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationVs : C.A. NO. WC ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT WASHINGTON, Sc. ANDREW R. BILODEAU : Plaintiff : : Vs : C.A. NO. WC06-0673 : JONATHAN DALY-LABELLE, Alias : Defendant : ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM Defendant, Jonathan
More informationCase 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,
More informationTORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce
TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION SOLEIL BONNIN 5901 Montrose Road, Apt. C802 Rockville, MD 20852 v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:
More informationGRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff
POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDY ZIOLKOWSKI, vs. Plaintiff, DREW UNIVERSITY, KIRSTEN
More informationCase 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-000-lb Document Filed 0// Page of CHHABRA LAW FIRM, PC ROHIT CHHABRA (SBN Email: rohit@thelawfirm.io Castro Street Suite Mountain View, CA 0 Telephone: (0 - Attorney for Plaintiff Open Source
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION LISA KERI STRICKLIN ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 17 GWEN STEFANI and ) LIVE NATION ) ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DOYLE BYRNES, 6702 W. 156 th Terrace Overland Park, KS 66223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
More informationCase 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationChapter 6 Torts Byron Lilly De Anza College Byron Lilly De Anza College
Chapter 6 Torts 1 Common Torts Defamation = Libel and Slander Negligence False imprisonment Battery, Assault, Fraud Interference with a contract Commercial exploitation of another s identity or likeness
More informationIN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANGELINA ADAMS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 16-2689 HASKELL INDIAN NATIONS UNIVERSITY, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and SALLY JEWELL, in
More informationCase 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179
Case 4:12-cv-00560-Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff, vs. AMANDA LOLLAR,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationCase 3:18-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Case 3:18-cv-00354-MHL Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Plaintiff, v. LOVE OF
More informationUnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk
2/2/2018 1:06 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 22259610 By: Nelson Cuero Filed: 2/2/2018 1:06 PM CAUSE NO. KRISTEN GRIMES, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY,
More informationCase 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. : : June 26, 2018 COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : JOSUE MATTA : : Plaintiff : : v. : : : Christopher Dadio; Luther Cuffee; John Slaven; : And Victor Colon, in their individual capacities : : : Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,
More informationCase 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.
Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO. 3:11cv-142-S TYSON MIMMS ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) COMPLAINT
More information3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY
More informationSummons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),
More information3:13-cv JFA Date Filed 04/04/13 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
3:13-cv-00882-JFA Date Filed 04/04/13 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Charles Smith, individually and as Parent of Minor
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.
Case 1:17-cv-05118 Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jason McFadden, individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated,
More informationPlaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Case 1:18-cv-00040 Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ) JOHN DOE 1, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE,
More information3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10
3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos, Deryck Santos, ) and Aidan McKenna. ) ) FOURTH
More informationELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK
ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT II. Torts 1. A tort is a private or civil wrong or injury for which the law will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. 3. Differs from criminal
More informationCase: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 311-cv-00397-TMR Doc # 1 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 13 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ZIMMER, INC., 345 E. Main St., Suite 400 Warsaw, IN 46580 Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationCase 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case :0-cv-00-CW Document Filed 0//00 Page of JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite 0 Oakland,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION
flled IN THE DISTRICT COURT ROGERS COUNTY OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARL PARSON, Plaintiff, vs. DON FARLEY, Defendant. CasCJr.2Q1lQ~ fq~ MAY 2 3 2016 :MHENmRTg~
More information3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8
3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos and Deryck Santos ) as parents and guardians
More informationCase 2:15-cv CMR Document 6 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:15-cv-06132-CMR Document 6 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL MACDONALD Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:15-cv-06132-CMR JURY
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 09BA-CV02314 GALEN SUPPES, WILLIAM R. SUTTERLIN, JURY TRIAL DEMAND RENEWABLE ALTERNATIVES,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PH (1) -00 FX (1) -01 www.rezlaw.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 1) Email: dal@rezlaw.com MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN 1) Email: mgl@rezlaw.com
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.
Case 1:18-cv-02387 Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO, an individual Fountain Hills, AZ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: MICHELLE
More information)(
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL
More information3:14-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION. Plaintiff, No.: Defendants.
3:14-cv-03055-CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Wednesday, 12 February, 2014 10:30:29 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION RICHARD
More informationCAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. 06-08-17998-CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS BENJAMIN SCHREIBER, a minor, LISA SCHREIBER, RYAN TODD, a minor, LISA TODD, and STEVE TODD 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationHow to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation
How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation Ty Hyderally, Esq. Hyderally & Associates, P.C. 33 Plymouth Street, Suite 202 Montclair, NJ 07042 tyh@employmentlit.com www.employmentlit.com O- (973)
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff
More informationORIGINAL COMPLAINT. View A& M University, and Defendants George C. Wright, Zena Stephens, Denise
Case 4:18-cv-01192 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/13/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON, DIVISION JASON JERMAINE TOLLIVER Plaintiff, vs. PRAIRIE
More informationCase 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:
More informationCase 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION Jane Doe 173, by and through her parents and guardians, Mother Doe 173 and Father Doe 173, Case No. vs. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Shawn
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 1:09-cv-00155-JRH-WLB Document 1 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 22 DUSTIN MYERS and RODNEY MYERS. Plaintiffs, VS. MURRY BOWMAN, Individually, and as the Chief Magistrate of Jefferson County, Georgia; WILEY
More informationCase: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
Case: 4:17-cv-02017 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI KAREN POWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No.: 4:17-CV-2017
More information) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says:
VS. Plaintiff ) COMPLAINT CHRIST(NCHISHOLM, ) ) music artist known as 2Chainz. 7. At all times pertinent to the allegations contained herein, Epps was a rap FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS defamation of Plaintiff.
More informationDEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1
Page 1 of 5 CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1 The (state number) issue reads: Part One: Did the defendant publish the [libelous] [slanderous] statement with actual malice? Part Two: If so, what amount of presumed
More informationCOMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROSS ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a THE PANTHEION CLUB, a Michigan Corporation, Case No. 2-11-cv-11132 Plaintiff, Hon. Sean Cox v.
More informationCase3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5
Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 3:14-cv-01961-KI Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 17 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 78385 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 06105 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Cynthia Gaddis,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:06-cv-00315-RCL Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARL A. BARNES ) DC Jail ) 1903 E Street, SE ) Washington, DC 20021 ) DCDC 278-872,
More informationChapter 2. Initial Pleadings
Chapter 2 Initial Pleadings New Jersey Family Law Forms.indd 30 12/27/11 84713 PM [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM ADDRESS] [CITY], [STATE] [ZIP] [PHONE] Attorneys for Plaintiff 2-001 COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE [PLAINTIFF
More informationCase 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13
Case 3:17-cv-00071-DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION [Filed Electronically] JACOB HEALEY and LARRY LOUIS
More informationto redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.
MICHAEL D. SUAREZ ID# 011921976 SUAREZ & SUAREZ 2016 Kennedy Boulevard Jersey City, New Jersey 07305 (201) 433-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan Plaintiff, ANTHONY TRUCHAN vs. SUPERIOR COURT
More informationDEFAMATION INSTRUCTIONS Introduction
INSTRUCTIONS Introduction The Defamation Instructions are newly added to RAJI (CIVIL) 5th and are designed to simplify instructing the jury regarding a common law tort on which the United States Supreme
More informationPlaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES
LIEBLING MALAMUT, LLC Adam S. Malamut - Attorney ID No.: 019101999 Keith J. Gentes - Attorney ID No.: 036612009 1939 Route 70 East, Suite 220 Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 856.424.1808 856.424.2032 (1) WWW.1,1\41awN.I.com
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2014 09:48 PM INDEX NO. 508086/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS MICHAEL KRAMER, Plaintiff, -against-
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff(s),
08/27/2012 13:58 FAX 908 757 8039 DiFrancesco Bateman CU 0002/0028 Case 2:08-cv-00066-ES-CLW Document 90 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 27 PagelD: 1263 Attorney (s ) NICHOLAS MARTINO, JR. Attorney for Plaintiff
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS
Electronically Filed 4/24/2017 8:50:30 AM Fifth Judicial District, Twin Falls County Kristina Glascock, Clerk of the Court By: Elisha Raney, Deputy Clerk Debora K. Kristensen, ISB #5337 Kenneth R. McClure,
More informationCase 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 6:14-cv-00227-JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT MCCOLLOM Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationBy and through his counsel, Michael H. Sussman, plaintiff hereby states and alleges against defendants:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------x VINCENT A. FERRI, Plaintiff, vs. COMPLAINT NICHOLAS VALASTRO, JOHN DOE I AND JOHN DOE II,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Case 5:12-cv-00173-CAR Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION TIMOTHY R. COURSON AND ) LINDA COURSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More information.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,
.. RANDY P. DAVENPORT, ESQ. Attorney-At-Law 50 Park Place, Suite 825 Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 623-5551 * Fax (973) 623-6868 Attorney for Plaintiff, Salah Williams rndavennortaaacom SALAH WILLIAMS,
More informationCase 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:16-cv-00657-DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY V. BRACEY VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1
Case: 3:12-cv-02380-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO VASQUEZ-PALAFOX, ) ) No. Plaintiff, )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CIVIL ACTION NO: JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) KOBE BRYANT ) ) Defendant. ) COMPLAINT FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT
More informationCase 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More informationCASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00824-PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil File No.:12-CV-824 (PJS/TNL) WILLIAM DEMONE WALKER ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) AMENDED
More information10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.
// : AM CV 1 1 1 SHANNON TANDBERG, v. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, PORTLAND CREMATION CENTER, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Defendant. FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com
More information