IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )"

Transcription

1 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV ) Plaintiff, pro se ) vs. ) COMPLAINT CONSTANCE AGREGAARD, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED C/O MG Robert Ashley, Jr., 448 Christy Avenue, Building 22408, Fort Huachuca, AZ Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff Ahmed Salau, pro se, for his complaint alleges as follows:

2 NATURE OF THE CAUSE This is an action for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of defamatory Statements made by the Defendant about Defendant s dealings with Plaintiff. As detailed herein, Plaintiff is entitled to actual damages, compensatory and punitive damages, damages for pain and suffering as a result of Defendant s actions, exemplary damages, special damages and other damages. Substantial parts of the events alleged herein took place in Arizona. The most recent and substantial events took place in Arizona and as such Arizona law applies herein. Plaintiff requests a jury decide these claims. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1332(a). Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1391(b) because a substantial part of the events or actions giving rise to Salau s claims arose in this district. Salau has incurred harm in this district as a result of Agregaard s tortious conduct, and Agregaard expressly aimed her tortious conduct at this district.

3 THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff, Ahmed Salau is a natural person and is a resident of Princeton, West Virginia. Plaintiff majored in chemistry and psychology and had a minor in women and gender studies. Plaintiff is also a professional research associate, co-author, co-investigator on a number of ongoing scientific projects that have been published in peer-reviewed journals published by reputable organizations like the American Chemical Society among others. Plaintiff also had another job as a student customer service assistant at the University of Missouri Campus Dining Services. Plaintiff was also involved and/or is a member of numerous groups on campus including but not limited to STOP TRAFFIC, BAPTIST STUDENT UNION, ON THE ROCK, AUTISM SPEAKS, PSI CHI, THE FOOD BANK, GREEN DOT, Foundation for the International Medical Relief of Children (FIMRC),among other organizations. Plaintiff is also the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer of PARIS Angels a mentoring program for at-risk youth. 2. Defendant, Constance Agregaard is a natural person and is a resident of Sierra Vista, Arizona.

4 STATEMENT OF FACTS 3. On or about August 2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant started working at Integral Resources Incorporated. 4. On or about September 1 st 2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant start a consensual romantic relationship & move in together. 5. On or about September 15 th 2012, Petitioner and Defendant meet Plaintiff s family and Defendant s family. 6. On or about September 30 th 2012, Plaintiff and Defendant visit the Family Health Center together and are informed that the Defendant is pregnant. 7. On or about October 1 st 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant visit Plaintiff s attorney friend Olayinka Hamza for the weekend. 8. On or about October 12 th 2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant decide to break up. 9. On or about October 14 th 2012, the Defendant falsely reports to the Police Department that she had been raped by the Plaintiff. To with: Ahmed Raped me 10. On or about October 19 th 2012, the Plaintiff is arrested by the Police Department and is in jail for seven months. 11. In May 2013, the Defendant recanted her statement to the police, after being confronted with insurance receipts, phone records and time stamped photographs that disproved her rape allegation.

5 12. The Defendant continues to make these false and defamatory statements and remade them in June 2014 to Mr. Lowe specifically stating that, Ahmed raped me 13. Plaintiff was informed by Mr. Lowe that the Defendant made the statements. 14. The Defendant s statements have been widely distributed on the internet and in newspapers world wide. 15. The Plaintiff is forever damaged by these statements. 16. The Plaintiff has lost multiple jobs and business and educational opportunities because of the Defendant s lies. The Defendant lost the jobs he had when he was arrested and every job ever since because everyone thinks he raped the Defendant which he IN FACT did not. 17. The stigma caused by her statements has completely destroyed the Plaintiff s image and caused him intense emotional distress. 18. The Defendant ended up keeping the child and has subsequently kept the Plaintiff from having anything to do with his child. The Plaintiff believes upon true belief that the Defendant sold the child for money. 19. Several members of STOP TRAFFIC and Women and Gender Studies students have heard Defendant s Statements. 20. Several members of Plaintiff s church The Baptist Student Union have heard Defendant s Statements. 21. Several co-workers and supervisors have heard Defendant s

6 Statements. 22. Plaintiff s Advisors have heard Defendant s Statements. 23. Members of PSI CHI have heard Defendant s Statements. 24. Members of Green Dot have heard Defendant s Statements. 25. Members of On the Rock have heard Defendant s Statements. 26. Plaintiff never raped Defendant. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation) 27. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 25 as if fully set forth at length herein. 28. Defendant s Statements and publications described herein (hereinafter called Statements) concerned Plaintiff and were false. 29. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 30. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice. 31. Defendant s Statements were slanderous per se because they injure Plaintiff s professional reputation.

7 32. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 33. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 34. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and

8 reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation) 35. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 33 as if fully set forth at length herein. 36. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false as a matter of fact. 37. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 38. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice. 39. Defendant s Statements were slanderous per se because they injure Plaintiff s personal reputation. 40. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions.

9 41. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 42. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 43. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City and community of Columbia. Defendant s statements permanently damage Plaintiff s reputation in Missouri and all over the world. Plaintiff will soon have to leave the world of academia and will likely face difficulties in obtaining employment at another university as a result of Defendant s false and defamatory statements.

10 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct) 44. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 44 as if fully set forth at length herein. 45. Defendant s statements concerned Plaintiff and were false. 46. Defendant s statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 47. Defendant s statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice. 48. Defendant s statements were slanderous per se because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct.

11 49. Defendant s statements accused Plaintiff of engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of Corrections. 50. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 51. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 52. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates and coworkers. 53. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a

12 result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander By Implication) 54. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 54 as if fully set forth at length herein. 55. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory. 56. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 57. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.

13 58. Defendant has no reasonable grounds for believing the truth of her Statements. 59. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 60. Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 61. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates and co-workers. 62. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.

14 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Slander Reckless Disregard/Malice) 63. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 61 as if fully set forth at length herein. 64. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false. 65. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 66. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice. 67. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped

15 me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 68. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 69. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and the Defendant s subsequent actions. 70. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies program at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.

16 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation) 71. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 69 as if fully set forth at length herein. 72. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false. 73. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 74. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice. 75. Defendant s Statements were libelous per se because they injure Plaintiff s professional reputation. 76. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped

17 me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 77. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 78. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 79. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of

18 $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation) 80. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 78 as if fully set forth at length herein. 81. Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false as a matter of fact. 82. Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 83. Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice. 84. Defendant s Statements were libelous per se because they injure Plaintiff s personal reputation. 85. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped

19 me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 86. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 87. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 88. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City and community of Columbia. Defendant s statements

20 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct) 89. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 87 as if fully set forth at length herein. 90. Defendant s statements concerned Plaintiff and were false. 91. Defendant s statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner. 92. Defendant s statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice. 93. Defendant s statements were libelous per se because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct. 94. Defendant s statements accused Plaintiff of engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of Corrections.

21 95. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions. 96. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs. 97. Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions. 98. Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.

22 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel By Implication) 99. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 98 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant has no reasonable grounds for believing the truth of her Statements Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped

23 me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of

24 $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Libel Reckless Disregard/Malice) 108. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 106 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements concerned Plaintiff and was false Defendant s Statements were widely published and not privileged in any manner Defendant s Statements were made with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant false and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to

25 and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager and her subsequent actions Defendant s statements forever falsely taint and permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential

26 and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 116. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 to 114 as if fully set forth at length herein Defendant s Statements and conduct were extreme and outrageous. So outrageous as to shock any marginally literate person s sensibilities Defendant s Statements and conduct have caused Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional stress Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent actions Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and time stamped photographs Defendant falsely and as a matter of fact charged the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates and our coworkers.

27 122. Defendant knew and intended that Plaintiff would suffer severe emotional distress as a result of her Statements and conduct. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment against Defendant awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $1,100, plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and reasonably punish Defendant for their conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering Defendant to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of suit and attorney s fees, special damages, exemplary damages and injunctive relief that the Defendant refrain from further defaming Salau and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just. Respectfully submitted, Ahmed Salau Plaintiff Pro Se P O Box 6008 Princeton, WV Phone) Fax) ahmed@ahmedsalau.com Dated : Princeton, West Virginia November 27 th, 2014.

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se ) ) Defendant.

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se ) ) Defendant. IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SPRINGFIELD MISSOURI DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV 24740. ) ) Plaintiff, pro se ) ) vs. ) COMPLAINT

More information

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JACKIE M. CLARK, C.A. No.: 2018-CP-23- Plaintiff, vs. SUMMONS SARAH ( SALLY WARWICK AND DAVID TIMOTHY

More information

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION FILED 2/4/2019 9:59 AM Mary Angie Garcia Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Victoria Angeles 2019CI02190 CAUSE NO.: DEREK ROTHSCHILD IN THE DISTRICT COURT as Next Friend of D.R. v. BEXAR COUNTY,

More information

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service 0 0 A. James Clark, #000 CLARK & ASSOCIATES S. Second Avenue, Ste. E Yuma, AZ Telephone ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE HAWKEY, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No. Case 1:18-cv-02387 Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO, an individual Fountain Hills, AZ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: MICHELLE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly

More information

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-000-lb Document Filed 0// Page of CHHABRA LAW FIRM, PC ROHIT CHHABRA (SBN Email: rohit@thelawfirm.io Castro Street Suite Mountain View, CA 0 Telephone: (0 - Attorney for Plaintiff Open Source

More information

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179

Case 4:12-cv Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179 Case 4:12-cv-00560-Y Document 28 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 179 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION MARY CUMMINS Plaintiff, vs. AMANDA LOLLAR,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ERICA N. STEWART PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO.: TAROLD DURHAM and BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT (JURY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On

More information

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2014 09:48 PM INDEX NO. 508086/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS MICHAEL KRAMER, Plaintiff, -against-

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) DAWN M. ST ALEY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS FILE NO.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) DAWN M. ST ALEY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS FILE NO. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF RICHLAND DAWN M. ST ALEY, Plaintiff, vs. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMONS FILE NO. 2018-CP-40- JIM STERK, Defendant. TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: I I ' ' YOU ARE

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

Vs : C.A. NO. WC ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM

Vs : C.A. NO. WC ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM STATE OF RHODE ISLAND SUPERIOR COURT WASHINGTON, Sc. ANDREW R. BILODEAU : Plaintiff : : Vs : C.A. NO. WC06-0673 : JONATHAN DALY-LABELLE, Alias : Defendant : ANSWER AND COUNTER-CLAIM Defendant, Jonathan

More information

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO.

Case 3:11-cv CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO. Case 3:11-cv-00142-CRS Document 1 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE NO. 3:11cv-142-S TYSON MIMMS ) ) Plaintiff ) v. ) COMPLAINT

More information

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and

4:15-cv SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 COMPLAINT. 1. This is an action for money damages brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, and 4:15-cv-04028-SLD-JEH # 1 Page 1 of 8 E-FILED Friday, 13 March, 2015 05:01:04 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION

More information

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 311-cv-00397-TMR Doc # 1 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 13 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ZIMMER, INC., 345 E. Main St., Suite 400 Warsaw, IN 46580 Plaintiff,

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45- STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff,

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF OCONEE C.A. NO.: 2017-CP-10- Jane Doe, Plaintiff, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF OCONEE Jane Doe, vs. Plaintiff, Oconee Memorial Hospital, Greenville Heath System, Defendants. TO THE DEFENDANTS ABOVE-NAMED: IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TENTH JUDICIAL

More information

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,

More information

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION flled IN THE DISTRICT COURT ROGERS COUNTY OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARL PARSON, Plaintiff, vs. DON FARLEY, Defendant. CasCJr.2Q1lQ~ fq~ MAY 2 3 2016 :MHENmRTg~

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION 3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD

More information

STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON)

STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON) STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION BRYAN ANTHONY REO 7143 Rippling Brook Ln. Mentor, OH 44060 Case No. Hon. Plaintiff, V. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST CHRISTIAN/ARYAN NATIONS OF MISSOURI

More information

Plaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )

Plaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. ) STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Bonnie U. Pittman, individually and as C.A. NO: 2016-CP-23-00945 Trustee of the Dorothy F. King Living

More information

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13

Case 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 Case 3:17-cv-00071-DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION [Filed Electronically] JACOB HEALEY and LARRY LOUIS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS DOYLE BYRNES, 6702 W. 156 th Terrace Overland Park, KS 66223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,

More information

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation

How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation How to Use Torts Tactically in Employment Litigation Ty Hyderally, Esq. Hyderally & Associates, P.C. 33 Plymouth Street, Suite 202 Montclair, NJ 07042 tyh@employmentlit.com www.employmentlit.com O- (973)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk 2/2/2018 1:06 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 22259610 By: Nelson Cuero Filed: 2/2/2018 1:06 PM CAUSE NO. KRISTEN GRIMES, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY,

More information

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:16-cv-00371-WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI. Case No. Division IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, LIBERTY, MISSOURI SALLY G. HURT, City, State, ZIP And SUSAN G. HURT, City, Street, ZIP Case No. Division Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOE Serve at: City, State, Zip Defendant.

More information

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11 Case 3:16-cv-00657-DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY V. BRACEY VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION

More information

DEFAMATION INSTRUCTIONS Introduction

DEFAMATION INSTRUCTIONS Introduction INSTRUCTIONS Introduction The Defamation Instructions are newly added to RAJI (CIVIL) 5th and are designed to simplify instructing the jury regarding a common law tort on which the United States Supreme

More information

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK

ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT II. Torts 1. A tort is a private or civil wrong or injury for which the law will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. 3. Differs from criminal

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual

More information

DEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1

DEFAMATION ACTIONABLE PER SE PRIVATE FIGURE MATTER OF PUBLIC CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1 Page 1 of 5 CONCERN PRESUMED DAMAGES 1 The (state number) issue reads: Part One: Did the defendant publish the [libelous] [slanderous] statement with actual malice? Part Two: If so, what amount of presumed

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29 Case: 1:13-cv-04152 Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN CZAJA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

Chapter 6 Torts Byron Lilly De Anza College Byron Lilly De Anza College

Chapter 6 Torts Byron Lilly De Anza College Byron Lilly De Anza College Chapter 6 Torts 1 Common Torts Defamation = Libel and Slander Negligence False imprisonment Battery, Assault, Fraud Interference with a contract Commercial exploitation of another s identity or likeness

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. : : June 26, 2018 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. : : June 26, 2018 COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : JOSUE MATTA : : Plaintiff : : v. : : : Christopher Dadio; Luther Cuffee; John Slaven; : And Victor Colon, in their individual capacities : : : Defendants.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 09BA-CV02314 GALEN SUPPES, WILLIAM R. SUTTERLIN, JURY TRIAL DEMAND RENEWABLE ALTERNATIVES,

More information

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : : Case 116-cv-07929 Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN WEST,

More information

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 06-08-17998-CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS BENJAMIN SCHREIBER, a minor, LISA SCHREIBER, RYAN TODD, a minor, LISA TODD, and STEVE TODD 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION SOLEIL BONNIN 5901 Montrose Road, Apt. C802 Rockville, MD 20852 v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:17-cv-07647-WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X Civil Action No. JAMES WHITELEY, COMPLAINT

More information

COMPLAINT. The Plaintiff, Marie Menard, brings this civil action for violation of her rights secured

COMPLAINT. The Plaintiff, Marie Menard, brings this civil action for violation of her rights secured RETURN DATE: August 16, 2011 MARIE MENARD Plaintiff v. SUPERIOR COURT J. D. OF FAIRFIELD At BRIDGEPORT STRATFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, IRENE CORNISH (Official and Individual Capacity) Defendants JULY 18,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,

More information

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case 4:15-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 4:15-cv-01413 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JONATHAN TURNER; v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT TEXAS

More information

Case 3:18-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Case 3:18-cv MHL Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division Case 3:18-cv-00354-MHL Document 1 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID# 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, VIRGINIA Plaintiff, v. LOVE OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 1 1 GREGORY PATTON, CA No. 0; AZ No. 0 ROBERT A. MOSIER, CA No. 1, AZ No. 0 LAW OFFICES OF GREGORY PATTON One Thomas Building N. Central Avenue, Ste. 10 Phoenix, AZ 00 Telephone: (0) - Fax (0) - greg@gpattonlaw.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ELG/mjw 12/08/05 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GERALD PRICE CASE NO.: 5:04 CV 2070 228 28 TH STREET NW BARBERTON, OHIO 44203 JUDGE DOWD Plaintiff, vs. PLAINTIFF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff(s),

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff(s), 08/27/2012 13:58 FAX 908 757 8039 DiFrancesco Bateman CU 0002/0028 Case 2:08-cv-00066-ES-CLW Document 90 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 27 PagelD: 1263 Attorney (s ) NICHOLAS MARTINO, JR. Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No. eelveo FEB 2 0 018 DJAS Case 1:18-cv-00150-RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18 FILED FEB 202018 CLERK tj.. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ci.ix, U.S DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FARRAH

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:06-cv-00315-RCL Document 1 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARL A. BARNES ) DC Jail ) 1903 E Street, SE ) Washington, DC 20021 ) DCDC 278-872,

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) Peter T. Phillips, ) Civil Action No. 15-CP-10- ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) COMPLAINT ) (Jury Trial Requested)

More information

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:11-cv GAF Document 1 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION Jane Doe 173, by and through her parents and guardians, Mother Doe 173 and Father Doe 173, Case No. vs. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT Shawn

More information

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES LIEBLING MALAMUT, LLC Adam S. Malamut - Attorney ID No.: 019101999 Keith J. Gentes - Attorney ID No.: 036612009 1939 Route 70 East, Suite 220 Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 856.424.1808 856.424.2032 (1) WWW.1,1\41awN.I.com

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/2014 01:36 PM INDEX NO. 508016/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS DAE HYUN CHUNG, Plaintiff, -against-

More information

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA SPENCER COLLIER, Plaintiff v. CASE NO.: ROBERT BENTLEY; STAN STABLER; REBEKAH MASON; ALABAMA COUNCIL FOR EXCELLENT GOVERNMENT; RCM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;

More information

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Kimberly Ray District Court, El Paso County, State of Colorado El Paso County Combined Courts 270 South Tejon Colorado Springs Co 80901 Plaintiff: Lola Anderson v. Defendant: Joseph Burton Attorneys for

More information

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. 1. Plaintiff Deanne D. Hubbard ("Dee Dee Hubbard") is a natural person and a resident

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. 1. Plaintiff Deanne D. Hubbard (Dee Dee Hubbard) is a natural person and a resident VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOUDOUN COUNTY DEANNE D. HUBBARD PO Box 1768 Middleburg, VA 20118 and JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JAY HUBBARD MEGAN HUBBARD PO Box 1768 Middleburg, VA 20118 and THOMAS PATTERSON

More information

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of

More information

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos and Deryck Santos ) as parents and guardians

More information

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10 3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 08/29/18 Entry Number 88 Page 1 of 10 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos, Deryck Santos, ) and Aidan McKenna. ) ) FOURTH

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,

More information

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER

DEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/15/2016 11:34 AM INDEX NO. 154310/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x KRISHNA DEBYSINGH, -against-

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-05315 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN BUENO, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, )

More information

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says:

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says: VS. Plaintiff ) COMPLAINT CHRIST(NCHISHOLM, ) ) music artist known as 2Chainz. 7. At all times pertinent to the allegations contained herein, Epps was a rap FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS defamation of Plaintiff.

More information

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS Electronically Filed 4/24/2017 8:50:30 AM Fifth Judicial District, Twin Falls County Kristina Glascock, Clerk of the Court By: Elisha Raney, Deputy Clerk Debora K. Kristensen, ISB #5337 Kenneth R. McClure,

More information

2:13-cv GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

2:13-cv GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 2:13-cv-14350-GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN VINCENT WORTMANN Plaintiff vs Case No:2:13-cv-14350 Judge: HON. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC

More information

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,

More information

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 Case 4:12-cv-01680 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHELLE LYONS Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Morris S. Getzels, Esq. (SBN 0 MORRIS S. GETZELS Law Office 0 Tampa Avenue, Suite 0 Tarzana, CA - Telephone ( -0 or ( -000 Facsimile ( - email: morris@getzelslaw.com

More information

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT

KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FAKE NEWS, WEAPONIZED DEFAMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT Erwin Chemerinsky The issue of false speech has been part of the United States since early American history. In 1798, Congress

More information

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Thomas A. Saenz (State Bar No. 0) Denise Hulett (State Bar No. ) Andres Holguin-Flores (State Bar No. 00) MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND S.

More information

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:11-cv-00941-CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv- FAÇONNABLE USA CORPORATION, a Delaware

More information

Defendant. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. through his undersigned counsel, Thompson Wigdor & Gilly LLP, as and for his

Defendant. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. through his undersigned counsel, Thompson Wigdor & Gilly LLP, as and for his UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x SALVATORE 1.MARCHIANO, v. Plaintiff, BETIY ELLEN BERLAMINO, in her professional

More information

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10

Case 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 Case 5:09-cv-00349-JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV- REBECCA LEACH, ) ) Complaint

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 3:08-cv-00052-KRG 3:05-mc-02025 Document 23 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 1 of of 9 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA DOHNER, Civil Action vs. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Case: 2:14-cv-00525-EAS-TPK Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO PILLAR TITLE AGENCY 3857 North High Street, suite 300 Columbus,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION Case 5:12-cv-00173-CAR Document 1 Filed 05/14/12 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION TIMOTHY R. COURSON AND ) LINDA COURSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII THOMAS M. GEISNESS The Geisness Law Firm Colman Building, Suite Seattle, WA. Telephone: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenors HONORABLE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY HONORABLE BARRY M. KURREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10 /17 /2016 12 INDEX : 41 NO. 158722/2016 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 131 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2016 03/02/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-02220-B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MORRIS & SCHAEFER LEARNING CO., LLC d/b/a LEARNING

More information

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times

More information