FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015"

Transcription

1 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x RESORB NETWORKS, INC.; ROBERT J. IANUALE Plaintiffs, SUMMONS Index No. - against - Date filed: YouNow.Com; YouNow Inc.; BNOW, INC.; ADI SIDEMAN; and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-3 Defendants x To the Person(s) Named as Defendant(s) above: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT YOU ARE SUMMONED to answer the complaint of the plaintiff(s) herein and to serve a copy of your answer on the plaintiff(s) at the address indicated below within 20 days after service of this Summons (not counting the day of service itself), or within 30 days after service is complete if the Summons is not delivered personally to you within the State of New York. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT should you fail to answer, a judgment will be entered against you by default for the relief demanded in the complaint. Dated: MAY 15, 2015 Robert J. Ianuale, CEO RESORB NETWORKS, INC. 52 Broad St, Suite 3 Keyport, NJ (732) Defendant(s) Addresses: YouNow.Com; 25 W 36 th St, 11 th FL, New York NY YouNow Inc.; 25 W 36 th St, 5 th FL, New York NY BNOW, INC.; th Avenue, #25D, New York, NY ADI SIDEMAN; 25 W 36 th St, 11 th FL, New York NY JOHN/JANE DOES 1-3; 25 W 36 th St, 11 th FL, New York NY

2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x RESORB NETWORKS, INC.; ROBERT J. IANUALE Plaintiffs, Index No. - against - Date filed: YouNow.Com; YouNow Inc.; BNOW, INC.; ADI SIDEMAN; and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-3 COMPLAINT Defendants x TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK The complaint of Plaintiffs, RESORB NETWORKS, INC. ( Plaintiff #1 ) and Robert J. Ianuale ( Plaintiff #2 ), respectfully show and allege as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. This is a suit against YouNow.Com, YouNow, Inc., BNOW, INC. and its CEO, Adi Sideman, with regard to making false and defamatory statements and taking defamatory action against Resorb Networks, Inc. and its CEO, Robert J. Ianuale, including Resorb Networks, Inc. s federally registered trademarks, brand, trade name, good will, and reputation. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they reside in and do business in the State and County of New York, and because this action arises out of conduct that took place in the State and County of New York. 3. Venue is proper in this Court because Plaintiffs and Defendants reside in the County of New York and because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred in the County of New York.

3 THE PARTIES 4. Plaintiff #1, RESORB NETWORKS, INC., a New York Corporation, has a principal place of business located at 52 Broad St., Suite 3, Keyport, NJ Plaintiff #2, Robert J. Ianuale, CEO of RESORB NETWORKS, INC., has a residence or principal place of business located at 52 Broad St, Suite 3, Keyport NJ Defendant, YouNow.Com, has a principal place of business at 25 W 36 th St, 11 th FL, New York NY Defendant, YouNow Inc., has a principal place of business at 25 W 36 th St, 5 th FL, New York, NY Defendant, BNOW, Inc., has a principal place of business at th Avenue, #25D, New York, NY Defendant, Adi Sideman, CEO of BNOW, Inc., has a residence or place of business at 25 W 36 th St, 11 th FL, New York NY Defendant(s), John/Jane Does 1-3, is/are unknown individual or individuals who work(s) for or is/are employed by YouNow.com, YouNow Inc. and/or BNOW Inc. ALLEGATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL CLAIMS 11. This action is for declaratory, injunctive and equitable relief, as well as for monetary damages, to redress repeated acts of defamation, trade defamation, destruction to personal and business goodwill and reputation, and libel per se committed by Defendants against Plaintiffs. 12. Defendants unlawful conduct was knowing, malicious, willful and wanton and/or showed a reckless disregard for Plaintiffs rights, which has caused, and continues to cause, Plaintiff #2 disgrace, humiliation and shame throughout the world, permanent

4 harm to his professional and personal reputations, and severe mental anguish and emotional distress. 13. Plaintiffs have acquired both federal and common law trademark rights to FISTPUMP brand, persona and name (collectively the Trademark ). Registration No: 4,031,644, and the Trademark has become well known online in the video broadcasting and live streaming communities, as well as various offline markets. 14. Plaintiffs adopted and used the Trademark before the acts complained of herein by Defendants. More particularly, Plaintiffs used the Trademark at least as early as January 2011, and continue to use it in commerce. 15. The Trademark is inherently distinctive. Through use and promotion thereof, the Trademark has become an intrinsic and essential part of the valuable goodwill, business, trade name, reputation and property of Plaintiffs (the Brand Name ). 16. Defendants unlawful acts, unless restrained, are likely to continue diverting monies from Plaintiffs and causing irreparable harm. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law because injury to reputation and goodwill cannot be quantified and such injury cannot be compensated solely by monetary awards. 17. Defendants unlawful acts alleged herein have been willful, deliberate, intentional, malicious, and in bad faith. 18. Defendants are engaged in the business of offering a live streaming video platform (the Service ). Plaintiffs had been using the Service since July, 2014, to promote the Brand Name, and had been working with Defendants as a partner (the Partnership ), a contractual obligation, which included monetization and profit sharing from individuals paying (herein referred as Tips ) to Plaintiff #2 because they respected and trusted the Brand Name and reputation of Plaintiff #2, and consistently watched Plaintiff #2 via the Service (the Broadcast ) on a daily basis, since January 19, 2015.

5 19. During the course of Plaintiffs use of the Service, Plaintiffs promoted the Brand Name with nearly 57,000 individuals (the Fans ) who supported and liked Plaintiff #2 s reputation and the Brand Name. 20. Plaintiffs have made Defendants considerable revenue during the course of their Partnership, based on the Brand Name and reputation of Plaintiff #2, estimated to be an amount of more than $100, during the course of the three (3) months from February 2015 to May On May 3, 2015 on or about 6:00 PM EST, Plaintiffs were using the Service when an unexpected argument arose between Plaintiff #2 and his girlfriend during a four (4) hour Broadcast, while nearly 900 Fans were watching. 22. Plaintiff #2 s argument with his girlfriend was not physical in nature, and the Broadcast was ended one (1) minute into the argument by an employee of Defendants (the Moderator ). Plaintiffs restarted the broadcast ten (10) seconds later, and continued to promote the Brand Name as regularly scheduled with Plaintiff #2 s reputation still intact. 23. Plaintiff #2 continued with the Broadcast several more times, as regularly scheduled using the Service, from May 3, 2015 through May 5, 2015 and continued to monetize on using the Brand Name without incident, and with Plaintiff #2 s reputation in good standing. 24. On May 5, 2015 at approximately 5:28 PM EST, Defendants wrongfully deactivated Plaintiffs access to the Service and made statements to the effect that Plaintiff #2 had verbally and physically abused a woman on his broadcast. Defendants alleged that Plaintiff #2 had engaged in this felonious activity, against Defendants Community Standards, in order to terminate Plaintiffs access to the Service. A true and correct copy of the defamatory writing ed by Defendants is attached to this petition as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

6 25. Defendants then began to issue defamatory statements and actions to the Fans, preventing the Fans from discussing the topic matter with risk of being suspended from the Service. Defendants actually began to harm the Brand Name, as well as the reputation and good will of Plaintiff #2, by suspending the Fans. A correct and true copy of this has been attached to this petition as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. 26. The Fans, who were now upset regarding Defendants negligent decision to deactivate Plaintiffs account, began to broadcast and voice their opinions in support of Plaintiffs. Defendants then began to disable the Fans broadcasts and began disabling the associated words describing a user s broadcast content ( Hashtags ), if they contained the Trademark, (i.e., FISTPUMP). 27. Defendants willfully and maliciously targeted Plaintiffs by disabling the Hashtags containing the Trademark, thereby preventing the Fans from supporting Plaintiffs and protesting the defamatory actions of Defendants. Defendants intended their actions and statements to cause financial loss to Plaintiff #2, or they should have reasonably recognized that their defamatory actions would result in financial loss. A correct and true copy of this has been attached to this petition as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. 28. The truth of the underlying facts would have been relatively easy to confirm, but Defendants failed and refused to confirm or attempt to confirm them. Plaintiffs supplied Defendants with copies of the police incident report, attached to this petition as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference, which clearly stated: RECEIVED CALL STATING THAT CALLER JUST WATCHED A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ON *YOUNOW* OF ROBERT IANUALE AT HIS APARTMENT HITTING HIS GIRLFRIEND. DISP PATROLS, SGT AUMACK ADVISES THAT ALL IS IN ORDER, STORY IS FABRICATED. PATROLS BACK IN SERVICE.

7 29. Rather than confirm these facts and adhere to the truth, Defendants published false defamatory material via and deactivated Plaintiffs account, with Defendants actions causing serious harm to the Brand Name and the reputation of Plaintiff # Plaintiff #2 s girlfriend, which Defendants had accused Plaintiff #2 of verbally and physically abusing then broadcasted live on her own account for over four (4) hours, with several hundred people watching, trying to explain that the statements made by Defendants were false and without fact, but Defendants still did not restore the account of Plaintiffs. 31. Plaintiffs repeatedly advised and informed Defendants of Defendants false and defamatory statements and action pursuant thereto, citing falsity, inaccuracies, apparent bias and defamation. Plaintiffs demanded retractions, and requested that Defendants discontinue their course of conduct. Yet, Defendants persisted in their untruthful and defamatory actions. 32. The defamatory statements by Defendants constitute statutory libel in that they tend to injure the reputation of Plaintiffs and expose Plaintiffs to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, tend to expose Plaintiffs to financial injury, and tend to impeach Plaintiffs honesty, integrity, virtue, and reputation further exposing Plaintiffs to public hatred and ridicule. 33. Prior to Defendants defamatory remarks, Plaintiffs enjoyed excellent reputations. 34. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants false and defamatory statements, Plaintiff #2 has endured shame, embarrassment, humiliation, and mental pain and anguish. Additionally, Plaintiff #2 has and will in the future be seriously injured in his business reputation, good name, and standing in the community, and will be exposed to the hatred, contempt, and ridicule of the public in general as well as of his business associates, clients, friends, and relatives. Consequently, Plaintiffs seek actual damages in a sum within the jurisdictional limits of this Court.

8 35. Furthermore, Plaintiffs are entitled to exemplary damages from Defendants because Defendants acted with the malice required to support an award of exemplary damages. Defendants acted with a specific intent to cause injury to Plaintiffs and/or conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare of Plaintiffs with actual, subjective awareness that its conduct involved an extreme degree of risk of harm to Plaintiff #2. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Defamation 36. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation above as if fully set forth herein. 37. Defendants published false statements about Plaintiffs, and by acting in such a manner to discontinue Plaintiffs access to the Service, furthered the defamation with knowledge of, or reckless disregard as to, the falsity, and/or did so negligently or in a grossly negligent and wanton manner, which caused actual injury to Plaintiffs and prejudiced Plaintiffs in the eyes of a substantial and respectable part of the community. 38. Defendants statements concerning Plaintiffs were false and defamatory of Plaintiffs. 39. Defendants statements were defamatory per se because they imputed conduct and characteristics that are undesirable, illegal and that have been taken to mean that Plaintiff #2 is an undesirable person. Defendants statements suggest lack of honesty in Plaintiff #2, prejudice Plaintiff #2 in his trade or business, and tend to deter, and actually deterred, others from working with Plaintiff # Defendants published said false and defamatory statements to employees and to others, despite their knowledge that the statements were false, or with reckless disregard as to their truth.

9 41. Plaintiffs are entitled to the damages and other relief requested herein on the basis of Plaintiffs being considered as public figures. 42. Defendants, intentionally and without justification, interfered with Plaintiff #2, and attempted to portray Plaintiff #2 as undesirable and to encourage others not to do business with Plaintiff # As a result of Defendants actions, statements and conduct as aforesaid, Plaintiff #2 has suffered significant damage to his reputation. Plaintiffs have also suffered economic damages as a result of Defendants actions, in an amount not yet determined but to be determined, the exact amount to be determined at trial. 44. Defendants false and defamatory statements and actions constituted both defamation per se, and defamation causing damage to Plaintiffs business affairs and reputation, in the amount of not less than $1,000,000, plus interest, costs and fees, the exact amount to be determined at trial. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Commercial Disparagement 45. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation above as if fully set forth herein. 46. Plaintiff #2 is CEO of Resorb Networks, Inc., currently located at 52 Broad St, Suite 3, Keyport, NJ Plaintiff #2 has been the CEO since March, Resorb Networks, Inc. is an S-Class Corporation, with Plaintiff #2 as the sole shareholder. 49. Defendants published and acted on defamatory statements which implied criminal conduct towards Plaintiff #2 that never occurred. 50. Defendants actions were done with actual malice towards Plaintiff #2, and therefore were defamatory.

10 51. As a businessman and entertainer, Plaintiff #2 s reputation in the community is essential to cultivating client and Fan relationships. 52. A false implication of criminality is damaging to the reputation of Plaintiff # Defendants intended their actions and statements to cause financial loss, or they should have reasonably recognized that their defamatory actions would result in financial loss for Plaintiff # Plaintiff #2 did, in fact, suffer a financial loss as a result of the Defendants actions. 55. Defendants knew or should have known that their statements were false and in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Trade Libel Pursuant to 15 U.S.C 1125(a) 56. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation above as if fully set forth herein. 57. Defendants have made, or knowingly conspired and agreed to be made, false or misleading statements to Plaintiffs prospective or existing customers. 58. The false or misleading statements made by Defendants were material, in that they misrepresented the business, background, quality and overall validity of Plaintiffs enterprise and services. 59. Defendants made these false or misleading statements and actions in interstate commerce, in connection with goods or services. 60. As a proximate result of the foregoing acts, Defendants have caused actual harm and are liable to Plaintiffs for damages in an amount to be proved at trial. 61. Defendants have engaged in conduct of malicious, oppressive, or fraudulent nature, thereby entitling Plaintiffs to an award of punitive damages.

11 62. As a direct and proximate result of the actions, conduct, and practices of Defendants as alleged above, Plaintiffs have suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages and irreparable harm. 63. Plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Breach of Contract 64. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each and every allegation above as if fully set forth herein. 65. The Partnership agreement was supported by valuable consideration. 66. Defendants intentionally breached the Partnership agreement. 67. As a result of the breach, Plaintiffs incurred damages, which include but are not limited to pecuniary loss and the loss of opportunities to make substantial profits from the Partnership Agreement. 68. Accordingly, Defendants are liable for breach of contract. PRAYER WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request judgments as follows: 1. That the Court enter a judgment against the Defendants that they have: a. Committed and are committing acts of trade libel in violation of 15 U.S.C 1125(a); b. Committed and are committing acts of defamation in violation of New York common law; c. Committed and are committing acts of commercial disparagement in violation of New York common law; 2. That the Court order Defendants to pay Plaintiffs damages as follows:

12 a. Plaintiffs damages (composed of Plaintiffs actual damages and Defendants profits) in an amount to be determined according to proof pursuant to 15 U.S.C 1125(a) for Defendants willful false statements, actions and trade libel; b. Plaintiffs general and specific compensatory damages and punitive damages for Defendants willful, wanton and extreme defamation of Plaintiffs and Defendants willful, wanton and extreme interference with Plaintiffs prospective economic advantages. c. Plaintiffs damages for injury to reputation, in an amount of approximately $10,000,000, the exact amount to be determined at trial; d. Plaintiffs actual, special, consequential and punitive damages on each of these claims, in an amount in excess of the jurisdiction of the lower courts, the exact amount to be determined at trial; e. Plaintiffs additional compensation and liquidated damages; f. Plaintiffs costs and expenses in this action, including attorney s fees; g. Interest, including prejudgment interest, on the forgoing sums. 3. That the Court grant to Plaintiff such additional relief as is just and proper. Dated: May 20, 2015 New York, New York Plaintiffs By: Robert J. Ianuale, CEO RESORB NETWORKS, INC. 52 Broad St, Suite 3 Keyport, NJ (732) (telephone)

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF CAUSE NO. Filed 12 January 27 P6:03 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District STEPHEN PIERCE and STEPHEN PIERCE IN THE DISTRICT COURT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. DALE

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service -against- Index No: Date Filed: 08109370 SUMMONS FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC. and JOHN DEUTZMAN, Defendants.... X The basis of venue is the Defendant's, Fox Television Stations, Inc., Principle Place

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:11-cv-00101-L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SATERA WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (2)

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2014 09:48 PM INDEX NO. 508086/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS MICHAEL KRAMER, Plaintiff, -against-

More information

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 Case 3:14-cv-02220-B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MORRIS & SCHAEFER LEARNING CO., LLC d/b/a LEARNING

More information

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION FILED 2/4/2019 9:59 AM Mary Angie Garcia Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Victoria Angeles 2019CI02190 CAUSE NO.: DEREK ROTHSCHILD IN THE DISTRICT COURT as Next Friend of D.R. v. BEXAR COUNTY,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION flled IN THE DISTRICT COURT ROGERS COUNTY OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA CARL PARSON, Plaintiff, vs. DON FARLEY, Defendant. CasCJr.2Q1lQ~ fq~ MAY 2 3 2016 :MHENmRTg~

More information

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 311-cv-00397-TMR Doc # 1 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 13 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ZIMMER, INC., 345 E. Main St., Suite 400 Warsaw, IN 46580 Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. IBRAHEEM HUSSEIN, d/b/a "MALLOME",

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 06-08-17998-CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS BENJAMIN SCHREIBER, a minor, LISA SCHREIBER, RYAN TODD, a minor, LISA TODD, and STEVE TODD 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..

More information

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:11-cv Document 1 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of H. STAN JOHNSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: BRIAN A. MORRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: COHEN-JOHNSON, LLC Dean Martin Drive, Ste. G Las Vegas, NV (0-00 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNTY OF KITSAP. ) Case No.: Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNTY OF KITSAP. ) Case No.: Plaintiff complains and for causes of action alleges as follows: 1 1 1 1, Plaintiff, V Scott Ellerby Defendant, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNTY OF KITSAP ) ) Case No.: ) ) COMPLAINT FOR ) ) Defamation; ) False Light Invasion of ) Privacy; )

More information

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says:

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says: VS. Plaintiff ) COMPLAINT CHRIST(NCHISHOLM, ) ) music artist known as 2Chainz. 7. At all times pertinent to the allegations contained herein, Epps was a rap FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS defamation of Plaintiff.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LAUTREC CORPORATION, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. ROBERT JAMES d/b/a Your Gemologist, LLC, and International School of Gemology, Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Brent H. Blakely (SBN bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com Cindy Chan (SBN cchan@blakelylawgroup.com BLAKELY LAW GROUP Parkview Avenue, Suite 0 Manhattan

More information

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Michael K. Friedland (SBN, michael.friedland@knobbe.com Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen (SBN,0 lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com Ali S. Razai (SBN,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:10-cv-00480-L Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) DETROY JARRETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (1) UHS

More information

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:16-cv-00371-WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:16-cv-04642 Document 1 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation

More information

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No. eelveo FEB 2 0 018 DJAS Case 1:18-cv-00150-RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18 FILED FEB 202018 CLERK tj.. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ci.ix, U.S DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FARRAH

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ /30/ :11 03:00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ /30/ :11 03:00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 05:11 03:00 PM INDEX NO. 507018/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-000-lb Document Filed 0// Page of CHHABRA LAW FIRM, PC ROHIT CHHABRA (SBN Email: rohit@thelawfirm.io Castro Street Suite Mountain View, CA 0 Telephone: (0 - Attorney for Plaintiff Open Source

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS Electronically Filed 4/24/2017 8:50:30 AM Fifth Judicial District, Twin Falls County Kristina Glascock, Clerk of the Court By: Elisha Raney, Deputy Clerk Debora K. Kristensen, ISB #5337 Kenneth R. McClure,

More information

CAUSE NO. DEFENDANTS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION I. SUMMARY AND KEY FACTS

CAUSE NO. DEFENDANTS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION I. SUMMARY AND KEY FACTS KALLE MCWHORTER and, PRESTIGIOUS PETS, LLC, V. PLAINTIFFS, CAUSE NO. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS ROBERT DUCHOUQUETTE and MICHELLE DUCHOUQUETTE, DEFENDANTS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO. 652945/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal

More information

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0-svw-as Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Beverly Hills, CA 0 FREUND & BRACKEY LLP Jonathan D. Freund (SBN ) Stephen P. Crump (SBN ) Beverly Hills, CA 0 Tel: -- Fax: --0 Attorneys for

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/02/2014 01:36 PM INDEX NO. 508016/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/02/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS DAE HYUN CHUNG, Plaintiff, -against-

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO. 653645/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JACKIE M. CLARK, C.A. No.: 2018-CP-23- Plaintiff, vs. SUMMONS SARAH ( SALLY WARWICK AND DAVID TIMOTHY

More information

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12 Case 3:08-cv-00141-CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA-DAVENPORT DIVISION MELISSA ROSE WALDING MILLIGAN, Plaintiff, No.

More information

COPY 1AR ) Dept.: P52 ) 2. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 ) 4. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 )

COPY 1AR ) Dept.: P52 ) 2. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 ) 4. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 ) 1 Alvin B. Sherron, Esq. (State Bar No. 106598) LAW OFFICES OF ALVIN B. SHERRON 2 COPY D 1055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1702i jrnia Los Angeles, California 90017 Tel: (213) 482-3236 1AR 09 2017 4 Fax:

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2.

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Central District Court Case No. 2:16-cv WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al. Document 2. PlainSite Legal Document California Central District Court Case No. 2:6-cv-0345 WBS, Inc. v. Stephen Pearcy et al Document 2 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WHEEL PROS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, WHEELS OUTLET, INC., ABDUL NAIM, AND DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. Electronically

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018 T SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â FELITA LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of L.M., FELITA

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2016 0633 PM INDEX NO. 655709/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/27/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Case 1:17-cv CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:17-cv CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Case 1:17-cv-01340-CMH-JFA Document 1 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division Gong Fan, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : : Case 116-cv-07929 Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN WEST,

More information

Case 1:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2017 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2017 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:17-cv-24428-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2017 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKIE BEARD ROBINSON, Delray Beach, FL v. Plaintiff,

More information

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk

UnofficialCopyOfficeofChrisDanielDistrictClerk 2/2/2018 1:06 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 22259610 By: Nelson Cuero Filed: 2/2/2018 1:06 PM CAUSE NO. KRISTEN GRIMES, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. HARRIS COUNTY,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO. 650457/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DAS COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Plaintiff,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/02/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10 /17 /2016 12 INDEX : 41 NO. 158722/2016 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 131 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/17/2016 03/02/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 10:56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO. 651899/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/20/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/20/2016 1058 AM INDEX NO. 157853/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2018 SUMMONS

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2018 SUMMONS SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONS Index No. OFFICE FOR STATE OF QATAR, Plaintiff, -against- SUMMONS JOHN DOES 1-10, Date Purchased: Defendants. To the above-named

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff DYLAN HEWLETT, D/B/A BEAR BUTT, Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;

More information

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DWAYNE THOMAS Vs Plaintiff, Judge Magistrate Case No:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE

More information

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017 FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/2017 09:56 AM INDEX NO. 150126/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. COUNTY OF RICHMOND Date purchased:

More information

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com

More information

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 9:13-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. Case 9:13-cv-80700-KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. THE ESTATE OF MARILYN MONROE, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. MONROE

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division JESSIE M. CASELLA, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MATT BORDERS, individually and ) in his official capacity, )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) THE OKLAHOMA PUBLISHING ) COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ) ) (2) JACOB JAKE TROTTER, ) an individual, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )

More information

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016 FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2016 04:14 AM INDEX NO. 150318/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND ----------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA SPENCER COLLIER, Plaintiff v. CASE NO.: ROBERT BENTLEY; STAN STABLER; REBEKAH MASON; ALABAMA COUNCIL FOR EXCELLENT GOVERNMENT; RCM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;

More information

2:15-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS COMPLAINT

2:15-cv CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS COMPLAINT 2:15-cv-02055-CSB-DGB # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Wednesday, 11 March, 2015 04:31:13 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS KYLE O BRIEN,

More information

Case 1:16-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:16-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:16-cv-07477-PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BARRY HONIG, an individual, Plaintiff, CASE NO. COMPLAINT v. TERI BUHL, an individual,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/20/2013 INDEX NO. 152552/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/20/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------)(

More information

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jam-efb Document Filed // Page of Jack Duran, Jr. SBN 0 Lyle D. Solomon, SBN 0 0 foothills Blvd S-, N. Roseville, CA -0- (Office) -- (Fax) duranlaw@yahoo.com GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA and

More information

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 9:12-cv-02672-PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION JULIE BANGERT, ) Civil Action #: ) PLAINTIFF,

More information

2:13-cv GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

2:13-cv GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 2:13-cv-14350-GCS-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/15/13 Pg 1 of 15 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN VINCENT WORTMANN Plaintiff vs Case No:2:13-cv-14350 Judge: HON. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 189934) Americans for Safe Access P.O. Box 427112 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone: (415) 573-7842

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Kenneth J. Montgomery, Esq. (KJM-8622) KENNETH J. MONTGOMERY, PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 451 Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.403.9261 Telephone 718.403.9593 Facsimile UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual, Case 2:03-cv-05534-NS Document 1 Filed 10/03/03 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ------------------------------------------ JOHN JOSEPH BENGIS, an individual,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/2013 INDEX NO. 155186/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY JOHN McKAY, Plaintiff, Index No. -against-

More information

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21

Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:17-cv-07647-WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X Civil Action No. JAMES WHITELEY, COMPLAINT

More information

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:18-cv-00445-PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 MARK L. SHURTLEFF (USB 4666) SHURTLEFF LAW FIRM, PC P.O. Box 900873 Sandy, Utah 84090 (801) 441-9625 mark@shurtlefflawfirm.com Attorney for

More information

COMPLAINT AND. NOW COMES the Plaintiff, JAMES LONG (hereinafter referred to as

COMPLAINT AND. NOW COMES the Plaintiff, JAMES LONG (hereinafter referred to as JAMES LONG Plaintiff, ELECTRONICALLY 4/10/2018 8:30 AM 2018- CALENDAR: PAGE I CIRCUIT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, 141N6901.,AWILIMINNOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION, CLERK V Defendant UNITED

More information

26 /1/ 28 /1/ Donny E. Brand (SBN ) BRAND LAW FIRM E. 4th St., Suite C-473

26 /1/ 28 /1/ Donny E. Brand (SBN ) BRAND LAW FIRM E. 4th St., Suite C-473 Donny E. Brand (SBN 2496) BRAND LAW FIRM 2 22 E. 4th St., Suite C-47 Santa Ana, CA 9270 Telephone (74) 769-648 Facsimile (74) 769-6486 4 donny@brandlawfirm.net 6 Atrneys for Plaintiffs RON S. BRAND and

More information

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164 Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:

More information

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:18-cv-05611-JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TREVOR ANDREW BAUER CIVIL ACTION No. 18-5611 Plaintiff VS BRENT POURCIAU

More information

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it 0 0 the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES -0 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it without notice or a hearing, as Michael Lee first learned at the hearing on his motion for the return of his

More information

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 7 Filed 08/19/17 Page 1 of 23

Case 1:17-cv AT Document 7 Filed 08/19/17 Page 1 of 23 Case 1:17-cv-06240-AT Document 7 Filed 08/19/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X FRANK WALKER,

More information

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:06-cv-05206-VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X KENNETH

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Case :-cv-000-e Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 GLUCK LAW FIRM P.C. Jeffrey S. Gluck (SBN 0) N. Kings Road # Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: 0.. ERIKSON LAW GROUP David Alden Erikson (SBN

More information

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada

More information

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:11-cv-00941-CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv- FAÇONNABLE USA CORPORATION, a Delaware

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45- STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL

More information

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23 Case :-cv-0-sk Document Filed 0// Page of James R. Patterson, CA Bar No. Allison H. Goddard, CA Bar No. Elizabeth A. Mitchell CA Bar No. PATTERSON LAW GROUP 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, CA Telephone:

More information

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1 Case: 1:11-cv-00123-DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MT INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, -vs- ALLURE INSTITUTE,

More information

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:18-cv-10833-RGS Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X SPARK451 INC. :

More information

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se ) IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. P. O. BOX 6008, ) PRINCETON, WV 24740. ) Plaintiff, pro se ) vs. ) COMPLAINT CONSTANCE AGREGAARD,

More information

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES LIEBLING MALAMUT, LLC Adam S. Malamut - Attorney ID No.: 019101999 Keith J. Gentes - Attorney ID No.: 036612009 1939 Route 70 East, Suite 220 Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 856.424.1808 856.424.2032 (1) WWW.1,1\41awN.I.com

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants. Case 1:17-cv-09635 Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 Justin Cilenti (GC 2321) Peter H. Cooper (PHC 4714) CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC 708 Third A venue - 6 1 h Floor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-11383 Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. WAL BRANDING AND MARKETING,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X X Index No.: 158809/2016 ELIZABETH STORELLI, Plaintiff, -against- AMENDED SUMMONS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT

More information