IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI. R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ)
|
|
- Cory Barton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN: Smt.Sarvamangala L.M., D/o late L.Mahadevaiah, Aged about 48 years, R/o Flat No.118, Janahavi Clusters, 6 th Main, P & T Colony, Sanjayanagar, Bangalore Appellant AND: (By Sri Shanmukhappa and Smt.Shamala, Advocates for Kesvy and Co.,) 1. Dr.Vidya Desai Mohan, W/o Sri Gopal Ranjit Mohan, Aged about 55 years, No.631, 5 th Main, II Stage, Indiranagar, Bangalore The Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, N.R.Square, Bangalore
2 2 3. Sri P.Vijaya Kumar, S/o P.Ramaswamy Raju, Aged about 43 years, R/o No.77/B, 6 th Main, Between 17 th and 18 th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore Smt.Y.Manjula, W/o P.Vijaya Kumar, Aged about 38 years, R/o No.77/B, 6 th Main, Between 17 th and 18 th Cross, Malleswaram, Bangalore -55. Respondents (By Sri M.K.Shivaraj, Advocate for Sri V.Vishwanatha, Advocate for R-2, Sri B.C.Chethan, Advocate for R-3 and R-4, R-1 - served) This RFA is filed under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated passed in O.S.No.16742/2004 on the file of the XIII Additional City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore, dismissing the suit for permanent injunction. This RFA coming on for hearing this day, the Court delivered the following: J U D G M E N T This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated passed by the Court of the XIII Additional City Civil Judge, Mayohall, Bangalore in O.S.No.16742/2004.
3 3 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant plaintiff is the owner of Flat No.F-2 on the second floor of Janhavi Clusters Apartment erected on site No.118 of Sanjay Nagar, Bangalore. She has purchased it by a registered sale deed, dated On the eastern side of the plaintiff s apartment lies site No.117. The building on the adjoining site No.117 was erected without leaving proper setback, which was also obstructing the free flow of air and light to the appellant s flat. She filed a complaint against the defendant No.1 before the Commissioner, Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ( B.B.M.P. for short) (defendant No.2). She also filed a complaint with the police. The defendant No.2 demolished the structure standing in deviation of the sanctioned plan but the defendant No.1 re-erected the same. The appellant plaintiff therefore filed the suit seeking the relief of permanent injunction against the defendant No.1. She also sought the mandatory injunction to the defendant No.2 to demolish the deviated portions of the building.
4 4 3. The defendant No.1 filed the written statement averring that he is neither the owner nor the purchaser of the suit schedule property. She denied the existence of any cause of action as against her. 4. On knowing that the defendant Nos.3 and 4 (the respondent Nos.3 and 4 herein) have become the subsequent owners of the suit schedule property, the plaintiff got them impleaded. The defendant Nos. 3 and 4 filed the written statement denying that they put up any building in violation of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, They submitted that they purchased the suit schedule property at Sy.No.117 from the defendant No.1 on by a registered sale deed. They became the owners of the suit schedule property even before the appellant plaintiff filed the suit. They contended that they have constructed the building as per the modified plan issued by the second defendant B.B.M.P. They contended, inter alia, that they have left the setback area of square meters, although they were required to leave 177 square meters as per the
5 5 plan. The permitted F.A.R. is 1.25, whereas the F.A.R. utilized is less than They stated that they have neither made any encroachment nor violated any law. They denied that they have done anything affecting the appellant plaintiff s easementary rights. 5. Based on the rival pleadings, the Trial Court formulated the following issues and additional issues: 1) Whether the plaintiff proves that, she enjoys getting free flow of air and light to the property, as alleged? 2) Whether suit against D2 is not maintainable in view of D2 being a statutory authority exercising its power in accordance with law? 3) Whether plaintiff proves alleged obstructions from defendant? 4) Whether plaintiff is entitled to the relief claimed? 5) What decree or order?
6 6 Addl. Issues: 1) Whether the relief claimed by the plaintiff is barred by limitation, as contended by the defendant Nos. 3 and 4? 2) Whether there is a cause of action for the suit? 6. The appellant got herself examined as PW1 marking the documents as Exs.P1 to P521. The defendant Nos.3 and 4 did not enter the witness box. The Trial Court answered the contentious issues against the appellant and dismissed the suit. 7. Sri Shanmukhappa, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent defendant Nos.3 and 4 have not entered the witness box. The second respondent defendant B.B.M.P. has also not produced any document, has not filed the written statement and has not adduced any evidence on the ground that the concerned file is misplaced. In this context, he brings to my notice the letter, dated issued by the B.B.M.P. (Ex.P1). The first paragraph of the said letter reads as follows:
7 7 It is found that the file of Mrs.Vidhya Desai Mohan, No.118, 6 th Main Road, P & T Colony, Sanjay Nagar, Bangalore , has not been handed over to us from the previous AE Mattikere Sub Division. 8. Sri M.K.Shivaraj, the learned counsel for the respondent No.2 (defendant No.2) submits that the building on site No.117 erected in violation of the building plan is already demolished on Sri B.C.Chethan, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4 submits that after , the existing building is strictly in conformity with the sanctioned building plan. 10. Ms.Shamala, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant quickly joins issue with the learned counsel for the respondents and submits that after , the defendant Nos.3 and 4 have re-built the portions again in violation of the sanctioned building plan.
8 8 11. The submissions of the learned counsel have received my thoughtful consideration. I have browsed through the L.C.Rs. 12. I find that the very framing of the issues by the Trial Court is unsound. The first and foremost issue ought to have been whether the plaintiff proves that the construction put up by the defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4 is in violation of the sanctioned building plan. If the building is erected in violation of the sanctioned plan, then also the plaintiff has to show that the same is obstructing the free flow of light and air. The question that is required to be examined is whether the appellant plaintiff has discharged her burden of showing that the building erected on site No.117 is in violation of the sanctioned building plan and that the violations have resulted in the stoppage of free flow of light and air to the appellant plaintiff s flat. The appellant plaintiff has not produced any clinching evidence in this regard.
9 9 13. The appellant plaintiff has not produced the sanctioned plan for Janhavi Clusters Apartment, in which her flat is situated. She has not lead the evidence of any independent witness, much less of an expert like a surveyor. She has not made any application for the appointment of the Court Commissioner for holding the spot-inspection and submitting a report thereon. She has not examined the owner, developer or builder of her apartment. She has not even lead the evidence of the occupants of the neighbouring flats in her apartment. Whether the defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4 have committed any deviation in the construction of the building and whether the same is affecting her legal right in some way is not at all shown. 14. Even her deposition is of non-committal nature. The relevant portions of the cross-examination read as follows: My flat has got plan map. I have not produced it. I do not know how much setback is kept at the time of constructing our building..i do not know how much setback is required site No.117. Witness states
10 10 that as per sanction plan 40% to be kept setback. I do not know how much they have constructed now Such being the scanty oral and documentary evidence of the appellant plaintiff, her suit cannot be decreed. 16. But then, the conduct and lapses of the defendants also cannot go unnoticed. If the second defendant B.B.M.P. were to file the written statement and produce all the documents, the matter could have been effectually adjudicated. For inexplicable reasons, the second defendant B.B.M.P. did not file the written statement and did not enter the witness box. The letter at Ex.P1 produced by the appellant plaintiff states that the first defendant s file is not handed over to the B.B.M.P. from its previous Assistant Engineer. The non-handing over of the file or the non-retrieval of the file or the misplacement of the file cannot be permitted to lead to a situation where some parties suffer and where some parties are benefited. The B.B.M.P., an instrumentality
11 11 of the State, is expected to act fairly and responsibly and assist the courts in the adjudication of the civil dispute. 17. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the defendant No.2 offers to file the written statement, if an opportunity is given. 18. The order sheet maintained by the Trial Court reveals that the matter was adjourned several times for the evidence of the defendant Nos.3 and 4. But they have not chosen to enter the witness box. The L.C.R.s reveal that the defendant Nos.3 and 4 have also filed I.A.No.9 seeking leave of the Trial Court to recall the order, dated and for the purpose of leading their evidence. The Trial Court dismissed the said I.A., by its order, dated and posted the matter for arguments. This order has not been challenged by the defendant Nos.3 and 4. It is not that the defendant Nos.3 and 4 maintained from the beginning that they had no evidence at all. They wanted to lead the evidence, but did not lead the evidence.
12 The Trial Court has drawn the inference in favour of the defendant Nos.3 and 4 because the defendant No.2 has not appeared. The Trial Court has observed as follows: Defendant No.2 has not appeared before the court and not disputed the stand taken by defendants-3 and 4 in their written-statement. So, inference would be raised that, only after realizing that, building put up by defendants-3 and 4 is in accordance with the approved plan.subsequently, defendant No.2 has not issued any notice to defendants-3 and 4 complaining that, they are violating the building plan. Presumption is that, it is satisfied by defendant No.2 that, defendants- 3 and 4 have proceeded to construct the building in accordance with the approved plan I am afraid such inferences are not tenable. The possibility of the defendant No.2 not filing the version, not producing the documents, not entering the witness box could be bonafide or deliberate or even to acquiesce what the defendant Nos.3 and 4 have done. On the permissibility of the civil court giving the mandamus to the B.B.M.P. to demolish the structures raised in violation of the sanctioned building
13 13 plan, the issue is no more res integra. It is covered by this Court s decision in the case of FAKIRAPPA v. BASALINGAPPA reported in 2000(4) Kar.L.J. Sh.N.29. It is extracted hereinbelow: KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1976, Section 321 Illegal construction Permission given by Corporation in excess of its power or in abuse of its power, to construct building in violation of Building Bye-laws Suit by owner of adjacent property for injunction to restrain further construction and for demolition of construction already made, on ground building, if constructed, would block flow of light and air to his property Suit decreed by Trial Court, reversed by First Appellate Court on ground that party has no locus standi or legal right to question grant of permission by Corporation and that it is matter between Corporation and grantee of permission Approach of First Appellate Court, held, is not correct and is bad in law and its order is liable to be set aside and suit merits to be decreed. 20. On the maintainability of the suit, this Court, in its decision in the case of AMEER BAIG v. STATE OF
14 14 KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, reported in 2010 (3) Kar.L.J. 404, has this to say: 8. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the 6 th respondent is proceeding with illegal construction in the very same premises. If that is so, it is open for the petitioner to approach the Civil Court or pursue the matter before the Competent Authorities. Reserving such liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. 22. In the result, (a) for not framing the proper issues (b) for the appellant plaintiff s evidence being sketchy and scanty (c) for the second defendant not filing the written statement and (d) for the defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4 not entering the witness box, the matter requires reconsideration. I therefore pass the following order: (i) The judgment and decree under appeal is set aside. The matter is remanded to the Trial Court for fresh enquiry in accordance with law. (ii) The submission that the defendant No.2 would file the written statement is placed on record. The
15 15 Trial Court shall consider allowing it after hearing all the parties and on such terms, as it deems fit. (iii) Liberty is reserved to the parties to file the draft issues. (iv) Needless to observe that all the contentions are left open. (v) The Trial Court shall dispose of the remanded matter as expeditiously as possible and in any case within an outer limit of one year from the date of the production of the certified copy of today s judgment. 23. The office is directed to send back the L.C.Rs to the Trial Court forthwith. This appeal is allowed accordingly. No order as to costs. Sd/- JUDGE Cm/-MD
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN : DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK B HINCHIGERI J
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1038 OF
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN : DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK B HINCHIGERI WP No.17464/2013(GM-RES-PIL)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.937/2012 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE DORASWAMY REDDY, AGED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU. Before THE HON BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP)
1/13 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Between Dated this the 26 th day of October, 2016 Before THE HON BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP) Mr. Jai M. Patil S/o
More informationN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA R.S.A. NO.1710 OF 2005
1 N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012 B E F O R E THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA R.S.A. NO.1710 OF 2005 BETWEEN: 1. Subappa, 1(a) Prabhuswamy,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO OF 2009(LB-BMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF AUGUST 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.34716 OF 2009(LB-BMP) BETWEEN GULF OIL CORPORATION LIMITED
More information2. Mr.M.Mohammed Amjad, S/o.Late.Dr.M.Mohammed Ghouse, Aged about 37 years,
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT PETITION No.5070/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Mrs.S.Prasanna, W/o.P.K.Somashekar
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTEMPT OF COURT. Contempt case No. 293/2003 (With CM No /2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CONTEMPT OF COURT Contempt case No. 293/2003 (With CM No. 12091/2006) Reserved on : October 13, 2006 Pronounced On : November 13, 2006 DARYA GANJ J.M.T.C.H.B.S.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA Writ Petition No.37048/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.6488/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MOHAN B C AGED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF MARCH, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 BETWEEN: SRI GANESH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s) OF 2016)
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 10062-10064 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s).34745-34747 OF 2016) GOPAL NAGAR COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JUNE 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1348 OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2013 (LB-BBMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION No.14387 OF 2013 (LB-BBMP) BETWEEN: UNION OF INDIA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. W.P.Nos.46210/2014 & /2014(GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR W.P.Nos.46210/2014 & 46799-812/2014(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri.A.Sudhakar Reddy,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI. Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI Application No.53 of 2016 (SZ) & M.A. No. 55 of 2016 IN THE MATTER OF: 1. Ananth Bhat 2. Ramasubban Sankaran Ramanathan 3. Neena Ramanathan 4.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE WRIT PETITION NO.48728/2012 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION NO.48728/2012 (GM-CPC) 1. SRI NANJUNDASWAMY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 14 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.A.Nos.4054-55/2013
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No.5740 OF 2007 (LA-BDA)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION No.5740 OF 2007 (LA-BDA) 1. Smt. Chanchal Bai
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS BETWEEN: W.P. No. 71556-71559/2012 (GM-CPC) VYSHNAVI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR RFA NO 483 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Judgment reserved on : 26.04.2011 Judgment delivered on : 28.04.2011 R.S.A.No. 109/2007 & CM No. 5092/2007 RAMESH PRAKASH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION Nos OF 2015 (GM-CPC)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR WRIT PETITION Nos.460-462 OF 2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.B.R.NAGALAKSHMI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.481/2016 BETWEEN: SRI H.ANANDA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29795/2014 (LB-BBMP) BETWEEN: SRI KAMLESH KUMAR,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. WRIT PETITION No.31892/2009 (LA-BDA)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.31892/2009 (LA-BDA) C/w.W.P.Nos.32095-32098/2009 (LA-BDA),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS.17117 & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: RSA No.55/2009 & CM No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: 06.04.2011 RSA No.55/2009 & CM No.6268/2009 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Through: Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate...Appellant
More informationii) The respondent did not furnish a Bank Guarantee for the amount of Rs crores and also did not pay the service tax payable on the said amount
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos.... of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 11964-11965 of 2009) Decided On: 06.08.2009 ECE Industries Limited Vs. S.P. Real Estate Developers P. Ltd. and Anr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO Writ Appeal No.597 of 2008
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR BETWEEN W.P. NO.466 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) SRI ANANTHAIAH S/O CHIKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.3219 OF 2006
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 31 ST DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR BETWEEN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.3219 OF 2006 1. SRI ABDUL GHANI
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION No.8438/2014(GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JANUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT PETITION No.8438/2014(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Shri.K.N.Sananda Ganesh, S/o.Late
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA. WRIT PETITION No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9 th DAY OF JULY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA WRIT PETITION No.27749/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MR. A.M SATYANARAYANA,
More informationDATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION NOs.13683-13691 OF 2012 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. WRIT APPEAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO. 8884 OF 2008 (KVOA) BETWEEN SRI G VIRUPAKASHASWAMY S/O
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9182 9188 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.24560 24566 of 2018) (D.No.31403 of 2017) Mysore Urban Development
More informationThis document is available at AIR2001SC1844, 2001(3)SCALE243, (2001)4SCC694 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Case Note: Case concerning the existence of easementary rights of having water flowing from the property of one property owner to that of his neighbor. The court held that no such easementary right existed.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY. WRIT PETITION No.45279/2011 (GM-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 01 ST DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION No.45279/2011 (GM-RES) BETWEEN SRI M.K.SOMASEKHAR SON OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.3777 OF 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) No of 2014]
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3777 OF 2018 [Arising out of SLP (C) No.13256 of 2014] Sucha Singh Sodhi (D) Thr. LRs... Appellant(s) Versus Baldev
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1751/2006 BETWEEN: Sri H. Isoob Sab
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION. W.P.(C) 1972/2011 and CMs 4189/2011, 4729/2011, 12216/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : UNAUTHORISED CONSTRUCTION W.P.(C) 1972/2011 and CMs 4189/2011, 4729/2011, 12216/2011 Decided on: 17.01.2012 IN THE MATTER OF SURESH GUPTA Petitioner Through:
More informationWRIT PETITION NO.58838/2013 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA WRIT PETITION NO.58838/2013 (GM-CPC) AND WRIT PETITION NOS.3291-92/2014(GM-CPC)
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos /2011. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.01.2011 + WP(C) No. 416 of 2011 and CM Nos.839-840/2011 DINESH KUMAR & ANR. PETITIONERS Through: Mr.S.N.Khanna, Advocate Versus DELHI COOPERATIVE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4453 OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY. APPELLANT VERSUS TINY @ ANTONY & ORS..RESPONDENTS J UD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03 RD DAY OF APRIL 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA BETWEEN: RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR) 1. NARAYAN S/O ISHWAR HEGDE AGE:
More informationShri Sadashiv S/o. Sakharam Pol, Aged about 67 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Chinchali, Tal: Raibag, Dist: Belgavi... Respondent
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN: WP No.104476/2014 (GM-CPC) Shri Sanjay S/o. Balasaheb
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 9/2008 Sri Mrinal Kanti Dey, S/o- Shri Mohit Lal Dey, Resident of Circular Path, Rukmininagar, PO-Assam Sachivalaya,
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 3694/2010 & CM No.7394/2010 (for interim relief) Versus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20 th July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 3694/2010 & CM No.7394/2010 (for interim relief) % ISHWAR DEVI & ANR. Through:... Petitioners Mr. K.S. Bhati, Advocate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. R.F.A.No.1725/2005
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL R.F.A.No.1725/2005 BETWEEN: Mrs.Premila Grubb, W/o Mr.Grubb, Aged 46 years,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. R.S.A.No.2061/2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL R.S.A.No.2061/2012 1. M.M.Thammayya S/o late M.M.Muthanna Aged about
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8241 OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT VERSUS DIDAR SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENTS N.V. RAMANA, J. JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.3.2011 RSA No.46/2011 VIRENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate...Appellants Versus JASWANT RAI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO OF 2014 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.38461 OF 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004 1. Smti Jaya Handique, W/o. Late Dimbeswar Handique, 2. Sri Pradip Handique, 3. Sri Bipul Handique,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1373/2012 (PAR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 29 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1373/2012 (PAR) BETWEEN Veerabadrappa, S/o. Late
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303/2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303/2013 BETWEEN: 1. Sri K V Lokesh S/o K G Venkatanarayana
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, 2015 + I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009 VEENA KUMARI Through... Plaintiff Mr.D.S. Vohra, Adv.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH R.S.A NO.1090/2011 (DEC/INJ)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BETWEEN: ON THE 04 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH R.S.A NO.1090/2011 (DEC/INJ) 1. SEENE GOWDA, S/O LATE MAYIGOWDA,
More information.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I.A. No. 11454/2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004 Judgment Reserved on: 09.08.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 02.11.2011 MADAN LAL KHANNA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3725-3726 OF 2015 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 3377-3378 of2011] H. Lakshmaiah Reddy & Ors...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS....RESPONDENT(S) WITH
More informationBENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Vs. PRAMILA SANFUI AND ORS.
BENGAL AMBUJA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Vs. PRAMILA SANFUI AND ORS. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7209-7210 OF 2015 (Arising Out of SLP (C) Nos.5902-5903
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS OF 2014 (LA-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF JUNE 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS. 53890-53891 OF 2014 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. ARUN KUMAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.No.1914/2007 c/w R.F.A.No.756/2008
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
More informationCIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10379 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8586 of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS RAZIYA KHANAM (D)
More informationWRIT PETITION NOs /2015 (GM-CPC) AND WRIT PETITION NOs.* /2015 (GM-CPC)
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30 TH DAY OF JULY 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA WRIT PETITION NOs.8136-37/2015 (GM-CPC) AND WRIT PETITION NOs.*8688-89/2015
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.7/2014 BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos of 2005 Decided On: Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judg
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos. 568-571 of 2005 Decided On: 19.03.2009 Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judges: Tarun Chatterjee and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Tarun
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: 14.02.2012 CM(M) No.557/2008 DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD. Through: Mr. D.K. Malhotra, Advocate....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 30 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Regular First Appeal No.958
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay) COL.V. KATJU Through: Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv....
More informationThrough : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY RESERVED ON : 27th NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON : 11th DECEMBER, 2014 CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN... Plaintiff Through
More informationIn the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.141 of 2013 Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S Central Bureau of Investigation through its S.P, (A.C.B), Ranchi Opposite Party CORAM: HON BLE MR.JUSTICE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.761/2003 (PAR).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.761/2003 (PAR). Between: 1 Sri M.Narayana, S/o
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, CM(M) 1155/2015.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, 2015 + CM(M) 1155/2015 PURAN CHAND Through:... Petitioner Mr.Arun Kumar and Mr.Udit
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE BETWEEN W.P.NO.31809/2014 (GM-CPC) 1. MOHAMMAD FAZLULLA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A S BOPANNA WRIT PETITION No.44222/2013 (GM-PP) A/W WRIT PETITION No.37973/2013 (GM-PP)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 3001 OF 2007(LB-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.14861/2006(LB-RES)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI. WRIT PETITION No.120/2014 (GM-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 8 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.120/2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: Major Pankaj Rai (Retd),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF MARCH 2015 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.1809 OF 2013 Ms. Sandra Lesley Ann
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.137/2011. DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.137/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011 NARESH KUMAR SAINI Through: Appellant Mr. S.P.Jha, Adv. VERSUS DAYA RANI DIXIT
More informationJudgment Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI. Suit No. 812 of 2001
Judgment Sheet IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI Suit No. 812 of 2001 Present : Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar Date of hearing : 27.11.2012. Plaintiff : International Brands (Pvt.) Limited, through Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN WRIT PETITION NO.85369/2013 (GM-RES) ASHOK KADAPPA JADAGOUD
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 149/2000 1. Musstt. Sufia Khatun, W/O Late Danish Ali. 2. Md. Mintu Sheikh alias
More informationR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS. CRIMINAL PETITION No. 979/2012
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. NAGAMOHAN DAS CRIMINAL PETITION No. 979/2012 BETWEEN: ---------------- Sri.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. FAO (OS) No.178/2008. Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO (OS) No.178/2008 Judgment Reserved on : 30th September, 2008 Judgment pronounced on : 9th January, 2009 Ms. Jyotika Kumar...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Date of Judgment: Ex. F. A. No.18/2010 & CM No /2010 YOGENDER KUMAR & ANOTHER.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 05.07.2011 Ex. F. A. No.18/2010 & CM No. 18758/2010 YOGENDER KUMAR & ANOTHER...Appellants Through: Mr.Ved Prakash
More informationSri J. Prakash vs Smt. M.T. Kamalamma And Anr. on 12 October, 2007
Karnataka High Court Karnataka High Court Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 Kant 26, ILR 2007 KAR 4752, 2008 (2) KarLJ 202 Author: S A Nazeer Bench: S A Nazeer JUDGMENT S. Abdul Nazeer, J. 1. In this case,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.No.2556/2012 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.PRAKASH S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA AGED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. RESERVED ON : March 20, DATE OF DECISION : April 2, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION RESERVED ON : March 20, 2008 DATE OF DECISION : April 2, 2008 LPA No. 665/2003 and CM Nos.4204/2004 and 6054/2007 JAGMAL (DECEASED)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2140/2006 BETWEEN: Ahmed Ali Saheb
More informationFinal Judgment on Police Protection Case by Supreme Court Of India 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Final Judgment on Police Protection Case by Supreme Court Of India 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5460-5466 OF 2004 MORAN M. BASELIOS MARTHOMA MATHEWS
More information