IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.
|
|
- Hollie Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.937/2012 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE DORASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. T.SURENDRA REDDY, S/O LATE DORASWAMY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS...APPELLANTS R/AT NO.3, C/O D.H.NAGARAJ, 8TH CROSS, BRIYAND SQUARE, POLICE QUARTERS, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE (BY SRI. R.VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE,) AND: SRI K.TULASI RAMA REDDY, S/O PARADESI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, 1 ST CROSS ROAD, 5 TH MAIN ROAD, NANDAKUMAR LAYOUT AREHALLI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE RESPONDENT (BY SRI.V.VIJAYASHEKARA GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
2 2 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF C.P.C AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED PASSED IN O.S NO.7686/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE 42 ND ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Defendants are in appeal questioning the correctness and legality of judgment and decree passed by the 42 nd Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore dated in O.S. NO.7686/2009, whereunder suit filed by plaintiff for permanent injunction has been decreed. 2. By consent of learned Advocates appearing for the parties appeal is taken up for final disposal. Heard Sri.R.Vijakumar, learned counsel appearing for appellants and Sri. V. Vijayashekara Gowda, learned counsel appearing for respondent. 3. It is the contention of Sri.Vijaykumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants that Trial Court erred in decreeing the suit and contends that Trial Court having come
3 3 to a conclusion that title of the parities could not be gone into in a suit for bare injunction, it has factually examined the genuineness of General Power of Attorney Exhibit P-1 and sale deed, Exhibit P-2 which were disputed documents and which is already the subject matter of consideration in a suit for declaration filed by the appellants in O.S.No.6142/2011 and as such, judgment and decree passed by Trial Court is erroneous. He would also elaborate his submission by contending that Trial Court ought to have held that defendants are in possession, when there was ample evidence to show that Khatha of the suit schedule properties still continues in the name of the original owner namely 1 st defendant and when the electricity bills also continue to reflect the name of 1 st defendant. He would further submit that judgment and decree passed by Trial Court that defendant should not interfere with the possession of plaintiff till disposal of suit O.S.No.6142/2011 is erroneous and it presupposes that plaintiff is in lawful possession and enjoyment of suit schedule property and same being contrary to record. He would also contend that Trial Court erred in not considering the fact that there was fraud committed by
4 4 plaintiff and his wife upon 1 st defendant namely they have created and concocted documents of title which has been completely ignored by Trial Court. As such he seeks for setting aside the judgment and decree passed by Trial Court. 4. Per contra Sri V.Vijayashekara Gowda, learned counsel appearing for respondent would support the judgment and decree passed by Trial Court and submits that on proper appreciation of evidence both oral and documentary, trial Court has decreed the suit and there is no error committed by Trial Court and as such he seeks for dismissal of the appeal. 5. Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties and on perusal of judgment and decree passed by Trial Court, I am of the considered view that following points would arise for my consideration. (1) Whether there has been erroneous appreciation of evidence by Trial Court or non appreciation of material evidence available on record and thereby it has resulted in erroneous judgment and decree passed by Trial Court in O.S.No.7686/2009
5 5 dated calling for interference by this Court? (2) What order? 6. Facts in brief leading to filing of this appeal are crystalised as under: Plaintiff instituted a suit against defendants for perpetual injunction in respect of property bearing survey No.90, khatha No. 20/9, situated at Arehalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore, measuring East to West /2 feet and North to South 31 feet together with 14 square RCC building consisting of ground and first floor (hereinafter referred to as suit schedule property ). It was contended by the plaintiff that he is in lawful possession and enjoyment of suit schedule property, having purchased the same under a registered sale deed dated from defendant No.1 through GPA holder Smt.T.Kumari and suit schedule property originally belonged to Smt. Byamma and Sri. Gopala and they have sold through their Power of Attorney holder in favour of Smt.N.Sridevi, who in turn sold the said property in favour of Smt D. Aruna and said Smt D. Aruna in turn sold the property to 1 st defendant
6 6 Smt. Muniyamma. Said Smt. Muniyamma is said to have executed a Power of Attorney in favour of her daughter Smt.T.Kumari and by virtue of the same Smt.T.Kumari has sold the suit schedule property in favour of plaintiff under a sale deed dated which came to be duly registered and possession has been delivered and as such plaintiff claimed to have obtained khatha, paying taxes and is in possession and enjoyment of it and also claimed that he had let out a portion of suit property and receiving the rent. It was further contended that defendants have no right, interest and title over the suit schedule properties. It was further contended that on account of attempts made by defendants to dispossess the plaintiff from suit schedule properties, suit in question was filed and defendants had filed a false complaint against plaintiff with the jurisdictional police and on these grounds plaintiff sought for suit being decreed. 7. On suit summons being served defendants appeared and filed their written statement and denied the averments made in plaint. It was contended that plaintiff is not the owner of suit schedule property and he is not in possession of the same. It was contended that husband of 1 st
7 7 defendant and father of 2 nd defendant was working in Chittor Co-operative Sugars Ltd., Chittoor upto 2003 and he expired in the year 2003 and 1 st defendant received a sum of ` 3.5 lakhs to ` 4 lakhs towards death cum retiral benefits of her husband and as such she purchased the suit schedule property from Smt. D. Aruna and she is in lawful possession of the same. She further contended that plaintiff who is her son-in-law took signatures from her on blank papers and created a General Power Of Attorney in favour of his wife i.e., first defendant s daughter and created a sale deed in plaintiffs name through his wife, who is none other than the daughter of 1 st defendant. She contended that her daughter during her visit to the house had taken away the original documents and created a false General Power of Attorney and thereafter created sale deed in collusion with her husband and as such, she filed a complaint before the jurisdictional police and same is under investigation. It was further contended that she is the absolute owner of suit schedule property and plaintiff is not entitled for relief of injunction. All averments made in the plaint came to be denied.
8 8 8. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, Trial Court formulated following issues for its adjudication: 1. Whether the plaintiff proves that he was in lawful possession of the suit schedule property as on the date of the suit? 2. Whether the plaintiff proves the alleged interference of the defendants? 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief of permanent injunction? 4. What order or decree? 9. Plaintiff himself got examined as P.W.1 and produced 14 documents and got them marked as Exhibits P-1 to P-14. Defendant No.1 got herself examined as D.W.1 and produced 2 documents and got them marked as Exhibits D-1 to D On appreciation of oral and documentary evidence and after considering the pleadings and arguments advanced by both the parties, trial Court by its judgment and decree dated decreed the suit, which is now questioned in the present appeal by the defendants.
9 9 RE POINT NO.1: 11. Plaintiff is none other than the son-in-law of 1 st defendant. Trial Court at paragraph 9 has rightly observed that in a suit for perpetual injunction, issue regarding title to the property cannot be gone into. At this juncture let me examine as to whether Trial Court dredged upon to examine the title of parties. Trial court while considering the rival contentions at para 10 has made following observations: Looking to the documentary evidence of the plaintiff, Ex.P1 is the original GPA said to have been executed by defendant No.1 in the name of her own daughter Smt.T.Kumari, who is the wife of the plaintiff on in respect of the suit schedule property. Ex.P1 has been executed and attested before the notary public. Advocate has identified defendant No.1 as executant of GPA in the name of her daughter. In respect of the GPA there is a presumption under the Evidence Act under Section 85, which reads as follows: Presumption as to powers-of-attorney:- The Court shall presume that every document purporting to be a power-of-attorney, and to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a Notary Public, or any Court, Judge, Magistrate, Indian Consul or Vice Consul, or representative of the Central Government, was so executed and authenticated. 12. Perusal of the above findings recorded by Trial Court cannot be construed as a finding arrived at by
10 10 examining title to the property. In order to ascertain as to whether the contention of plaintiff regarding possession is to be accepted or not and for the said limited purpose, Trial Court has expressed its opinion on the documents produced by parties as extracted hereinabove. That by itself cannot be construed as Trial Court has expressed opinion or its views on the title to the suit property. 13. Be that as it may. If it is clarified or made clear that said finding is only for the purposes of ascertaining the possession of the parties alone, that Trial Court had examined the contents of General Power of Attorney Exhibit P1, it would suffice inasmuch as 1 st defendant in the instant case has undisputedly filed a comprehensive suit O.S.No.6142/2011 seeking following reliefs: (a) To cancel the purported sale deed dated , which is registered as document No.1 BSK / , stored in C.D. No.BSKD-27, in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Banashankari, Bangalore entered between 1 st and 2 nd defendants herein. (b) To declare that the sale deed dated , registered as document No. BSK / , stored in C.D. No.BSKD-27 in the office of the Sub-
11 11 Registrar, Banashankari, Bangalore entered between 1 st and 2 nd defendants as null and void. (c) To declare that, the second plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property by virtue of the registered gift deed dated , vide document No. BSK-I-00710/ , stored in CD No.BSKD- 40. (d) Direct the defendants 1 and 2 to handover all original documents of title pertaining to the suit schedule properties to the plaintiffs. (e) To grant perpetual injunction restraining 1 st and 2 nd defendants or their agents, workmen or any one claiming under them from interfering the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property by the plaintiff and the Hon ble Court award costs of the suit and grant such other relief as this Hon ble court may deem fit to grant in the facts of the case. (f) To grant any other decree or order which this Hon ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case. 14. This would clearly indicate that both the parties are now seeking adjudication of the dispute in respect of suit schedule property which is being adjudicated by the
12 12 competent Court in O.S. No.6142/2011. As such, any observation made by Trial Court in the case of judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.7686/2009 shall not prejudice the rights of the parties in the comprehensive suit O.S. No.6142/2011 now pending in respect of suit schedule property. It is also made clear that judgment and decree passed by Trial court in O.S. No. 7686/2009 is for the limited purpose of examining the possession of plaintiff and it would also not come in the way of parties to prove their respective pleadings in the pending comprehensive suit O.S. No. 6142/ Now turning back my attention to judgment and decree passed by Trial Court, it would indicate that suit schedule property was originally standing in the name of Smt. Byamma and Sri. Gopala and they through their Power of Attorney holders Sriyuths C.Subramanya Naidu and V.Rajendra Naidu executed a sale deed dated in favour of Smt. N.Sridevi. Said sale deed is produced and marked as Exhibit P-3. Said Smt.N.Sridevi in turn had sold the suit schedule properties in favour of Smt. D. Aruna on , which sale deed has been produced and marked
13 13 as Exhibit P-4. Said Smt. D. Aruna in turn has sold it in favour of Smt.T.Muniyamma - 1 st defendant herein under a registered sale deed dated , which is also produced and marked as Exhibit P-5. These facts are not in dispute between both plaintiff and defendants. The dispute between the parties has arisen by virtue of a power of attorney said to have been executed by 1 st defendant - Smt. Muniyamma according to plaintiff in favour of her daughter Smt. T. Kumari (plaintiff s wife) on , and same is the bone of contention between the parties. Said power of attorney has been produced by plaintiff and marked as Exhibit P-1. By virtue of said power of attorney executed by Smt. Muniyamma in favour of her daughter she has sold the suit schedule property in favour of her husband - plaintiff herein under a registered sale deed dated , which is produced and marked as Exhibit P-2. It is these two documents, which are under attack by the defendants before Trial Court. 16. As already observed hereinabove insofar as sale deed dated (Ex.P.2) is concerned the very same defendants have already filed a comprehensive suit
14 14 O.S.No.6142/2011 seeking for cancellation of said sale deed and to declare 2 nd plaintiff to be the absolute owner by virtue of gift deed dated said to have been executed by 1 st defendant in favour of 2 nd defendant. This Court has already clarified hereinabove that observation made by Trial Court with regard to power of attorney is limited for the purposes of adjudication of dispute between the parties in the present suit i.e., O.S.No.7686/2009 and it cannot be considered or construed as Trial court having examined the title of the parties. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered view that Trial Court has not committed error nor there has been any erroneous appreciation of evidence to arrive at a conclusion that plaintiff is in possession of the suit schedule property. In that view of the matter judgment and decree passed by Trial Court does not call for any interference. 17. Though Sri. R. Vijaykumar, learned counsel appearing for appellant expressed apprehension of plaintiff alienating or encumbering suit schedule property was required to be examined, same would not arise since Sri. V. Vijayashekara Gowda, learned counsel appearing for
15 15 plaintiff would fairly submit that during the pendency of suit O.S.No.6142/2011, suit schedule property would neither be encumbered nor would be sold to create third party rights and as such placing his submission on record the apprehension expressed by the learned counsel appearing for appellant is hereby allayed. In that view of the matter, I am of the considered view that no further order requires to be passed in this appeal with regard to apprehension expressed by learned counsel for appellants/defendants. In the result following order is passed: ORDER i. Appeal is hereby dismissed. ii. Judgment and decree passed by the 42 nd Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore dated in O.S. NO.7686/2009, is hereby affirmed subject to observations made hereinabove. iii. Parties to bear their respective costs. Sd/- JUDGE DR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF MARCH, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 BETWEEN: SRI GANESH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1038 OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. R.S.A.No.2061/2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL R.S.A.No.2061/2012 1. M.M.Thammayya S/o late M.M.Muthanna Aged about
More informationN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA R.S.A. NO.1710 OF 2005
1 N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 30 th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2012 B E F O R E THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.SREENIVASE GOWDA R.S.A. NO.1710 OF 2005 BETWEEN: 1. Subappa, 1(a) Prabhuswamy,
More information2. Mr.M.Mohammed Amjad, S/o.Late.Dr.M.Mohammed Ghouse, Aged about 37 years,
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT PETITION No.5070/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Mrs.S.Prasanna, W/o.P.K.Somashekar
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21 ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2016 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR RFA NO 483 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JUNE 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1348 OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN: DATED THIS THE 30 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Regular First Appeal No.958
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Judgment reserved on : 26.04.2011 Judgment delivered on : 28.04.2011 R.S.A.No. 109/2007 & CM No. 5092/2007 RAMESH PRAKASH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1373/2012 (PAR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 29 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1373/2012 (PAR) BETWEEN Veerabadrappa, S/o. Late
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 149/2000 1. Musstt. Sufia Khatun, W/O Late Danish Ali. 2. Md. Mintu Sheikh alias
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO Writ Appeal No.597 of 2008
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 3725-3726 OF 2015 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 3377-3378 of2011] H. Lakshmaiah Reddy & Ors...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS JUSTICE S SUJATHA Writ Petition No.37048/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION Nos OF 2015 (GM-CPC)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR WRIT PETITION Nos.460-462 OF 2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.B.R.NAGALAKSHMI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.No.1914/2007 c/w R.F.A.No.756/2008
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8241 OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT VERSUS DIDAR SINGH & ANR. RESPONDENTS N.V. RAMANA, J. JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 01 st DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.No.2/2010 BETWEEN: REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2/2010 C/W. REGULAR FIRST
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 4 th August, 2015 + I.A. No.16571/2012 & I.A. No.16572/2012 in CS (OS) 2527/2009 VEENA KUMARI Through... Plaintiff Mr.D.S. Vohra, Adv.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANANDA. R.S.A.No.1045/2006 (INJ)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANANDA R.S.A.No.1045/2006 (INJ) BETWEEN: Sri Ramakrishna S/o Shivannegowda Aged
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR BETWEEN W.P. NO.466 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) SRI ANANTHAIAH S/O CHIKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO OF 2014 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.38461 OF 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH R.S.A NO.1090/2011 (DEC/INJ)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BETWEEN: ON THE 04 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH R.S.A NO.1090/2011 (DEC/INJ) 1. SEENE GOWDA, S/O LATE MAYIGOWDA,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment pronounced on: 10.04.2012 I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.136/2009 SUGANDHA SETHI...Plaintiff Through: Ms. N.Shoba with Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.3219 OF 2006
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 31 ST DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR BETWEEN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.3219 OF 2006 1. SRI ABDUL GHANI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI. R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN: Smt.Sarvamangala L.M., D/o
More informationWRIT PETITION No.31126/2012 (GM-CPC)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013 BEFORE R THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.31126/2012 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03 RD DAY OF APRIL 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA BETWEEN: RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR) 1. NARAYAN S/O ISHWAR HEGDE AGE:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January, 2014 SURESH BALA & ORS Through: Mr. B.S.Mann, Advocate....Appellants VERSUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE. DATED THIS THE 23 rd DAY OF JULY 2013 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23 rd DAY OF JULY 2013 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.2021 OF 2011 1. Chandrashekar.A, Son
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS. W.P. No /2012 (GM-CPC)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS BETWEEN: W.P. No. 71556-71559/2012 (GM-CPC) VYSHNAVI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.137/2011. DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.137/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011 NARESH KUMAR SAINI Through: Appellant Mr. S.P.Jha, Adv. VERSUS DAYA RANI DIXIT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. W.P.Nos.46210/2014 & /2014(GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR W.P.Nos.46210/2014 & 46799-812/2014(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri.A.Sudhakar Reddy,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA. W.P. No OF 2014 (KLR-RR-SUR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA W.P. No. 52671 OF 2014 (KLR-RR-SUR) BETWEEN AND SMT MAHADEVAMMA D/O
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA 212/2005 1. Md. Hussain Ahmed 2. Md. Ilas Ahmed @ Bilal Ahmed 3. Md. Masuk Ahmed 4. Mustt. Chhayaban Nessa
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.21548/2013 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. A MANJUNATH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 07 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5290/2009 A/W MFA CROB NO.136/2010 BETWEEN:
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 132/2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Md. Alauddin, S/o Late Nazar Ali, 2. Mrs. Phulmati W/o Alauddin Both are resident of- Village:-
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO. 45305/2011 (L-PG) BETWEEN: C.D ANANDA RAO S/O SRI DALAPPA AGED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS.17117 & 17437/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Sri
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.481/2016 BETWEEN: SRI H.ANANDA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.200/2003. Reserved on 14th February, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.200/2003 Reserved on 14th February, 2012 Pronounced on 2nd March, 2012 SHRI VED PRAKASH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014 BEFORE: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION No.13520 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) Smt. Narayanamma,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.761/2003 (PAR).
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.761/2003 (PAR). Between: 1 Sri M.Narayana, S/o
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE LPA 776 OF 2012, CMs No. 19869/2012 (stay), 19870/2012 (additional documents), 19871/2012 (delay) Judgment Delivered on 29.11.2012
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1751/2006 BETWEEN: Sri H. Isoob Sab
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 14 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2013 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.6488/2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MOHAN B C AGED
More informationCIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10379 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8586 of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS RAZIYA KHANAM (D)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.365 /2008 DATE OF DECISION : 10th February, 2012 VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.365 /2008 DATE OF DECISION : 10th February, 2012 SHRI VIJAY KUMAR Through: Appellant in person.... Appellant VERSUS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Md. Anowar Hussain & others Jamal Uddin & others -Versus- Appellants... Respondents BEFORE :: HON BLE
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 168/1999 On the death of Sibanath Sarma, the sole appellant his legal heirs
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: RSA No.46/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 10.3.2011 RSA No.46/2011 VIRENDER KUMAR & ANR. Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate...Appellants Versus JASWANT RAI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2642/2009
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 07 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR BETWEEN M/S PREETI IMPLEX REGD PARTNERSHIP FIRM BY ITS PARTNERS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2798/2011 % 19 th October, 2015 SH. SUSHIL YADAV AND ANR. Through: None.... Plaintiffs Versus M/S VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ORS.... Defendants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No. 581/2003. DATE OF DECISION : 13th March, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No. 581/2003 DATE OF DECISION : 13th March, 2012 M/S B.R.METAL CORPN. & ORS. Appellants Through : Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6472/2014
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6472/2014 BETWEEN: SRI DR.SENTILNATHAN S/O SRI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.595/2003 Reserved on: 4th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 13th January, 2012 SHRI VIRENDER SINGH Through: Mr. R.C. Chopra,
More informationThrough : Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY RESERVED ON : 27th NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON : 11th DECEMBER, 2014 CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN... Plaintiff Through
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE WRIT PETITION NO.6157 OF 2013 (GM-CPC) (By Sri.Mahesh K.V. & Sri.H.Mujtaba, Advs.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO.6157 OF 2013 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B.V.Ramachandre
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR. REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.2140/2006 BETWEEN: Ahmed Ali Saheb
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.74 of 2001 On the death of the appellant, Mustt. Anowara Bewa, the following
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos of 2005 Decided On: Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judg
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos. 568-571 of 2005 Decided On: 19.03.2009 Narasamma and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and Ors. Hon'ble Judges: Tarun Chatterjee and Harjit Singh Bedi, JJ. Tarun
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE WRIT PETITION NO.48728/2012 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION NO.48728/2012 (GM-CPC) 1. SRI NANJUNDASWAMY
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(OS) No. 684/2004 % 8 th December, versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No. 684/2004 % 8 th December, 2015 RAJESH @ RAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manish Vashisth and Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Advocates. versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303/2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF JULY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303/2013 BETWEEN: 1. Sri K V Lokesh S/o K G Venkatanarayana
More informationThrough: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. C.M(M) No. 211/2013. Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) Nos. 208/2013 & 211/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 4th December, 2014 C.M(M) No. 208/2013 SUDARSHAN KUMAR JAIN Through: Mr. Rahul
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.7/2014 BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER
More informationKarnataka High Court Karnataka High Court Tukaram Ganu Pawar vs Chandra Atma Pawar on 8 July, 2005 Author: A Byrareddy Bench: A Byrareddy JUDGMENT
Karnataka High Court Karnataka High Court Author: A Byrareddy Bench: A Byrareddy JUDGMENT Anand Byrareddy, J. 1. This appeal is by the defendant in the suit. The appellant contends that he is the owner
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Date of Reserve: 5th July, Date of judgment: November 06, 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Date of Reserve: 5th July, 2007 Date of judgment: November 06, 2007 CS(OS) No.1440/2000 Mela Ram... Through: Plaintiff Ms.Sonia Khurana
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT RSA No. 94/ 2007 1. Musssamat Amirun Nessa, Wife of Late Safiquir Rahman 2. Hilal Uddin, Son
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. WRIT PETITION Nos /2015 (T-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.8854-8874/2015 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S.PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS
More informationDATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION NOs.13683-13691 OF 2012 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.95/2010. DATE OF DECISION : 17th January, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.95/2010 DATE OF DECISION : 17th January, 2012 SANT RAM MANGAT RAM JEWELLERS Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil, Advocate.... Appellant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR. WRIT PETITION No.8438/2014(GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JANUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT PETITION No.8438/2014(GM-CPC) BETWEEN: Shri.K.N.Sananda Ganesh, S/o.Late
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) through LRs..Appellant(s) VERSUS Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao &
More information.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I.A. No. 11454/2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004 Judgment Reserved on: 09.08.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 02.11.2011 MADAN LAL KHANNA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS /2014 C/W 85491/2013 (KLR-RES)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 8 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NOS.107810/2014 C/W 85491/2013 (KLR-RES) IN WP NO 107810
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.284/2006
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B BETWEEN: REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.284/2006 Mukdum Sab, S/o. Kasimsab,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE. W.P.NOs.35-37/2013 (GM-RES)
1 BETWEEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE W.P.NOs.35-37/2013 (GM-RES) SMT P A VENKATALAKSHMI W/O RAJENDRA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.51/2012 DATE OF DECISION : 17th May, 2012 MS. KRITI KOHLI Through: Mr. Rao Balvir Singh, Advocate... Appellant VERSUS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No(s) OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s) OF 2016)
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No(s). 10062-10064 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No(s).34745-34747 OF 2016) GOPAL NAGAR COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Date of Decision: 06.03.2014 CRL.A. 1011 of 2013 S.K. JAIN... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. versus VIJAY KALRA... Respondent
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, Date of Judgment :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Date of Judgment : 16.02.2012 CRP 128/2004 and CM No. 85/2012 M/S R.S. BUILDERS & ENGINEERS LTD. Through Mr. Prabhjit
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. CM(M) No. 932/2007 and CM(M) No. 938/2007 RESERVED ON: 4.12.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION CM(M) No. 932/2007 and CM(M) No. 938/2007 RESERVED ON: 4.12.2007 DATE OF DECISION: 7.12.2007 Arti Arora... Through: Petitioner Mr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.1269-1270 OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 21402-21403 OF 2015 PYARELAL... APPELLANT Versus SHUBHENDRA
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. RSA No. 106 of Smt. Mailata Talukdar, W/O Lt. Madhab Talukdar.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 106 of 2003 1. Smt. Mailata Talukdar, W/O Lt. Madhab Talukdar. 2. Sri Amarendra Talukdar, S/O Lt. Madhab
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY WILL MATTER Reserved on: Pronounced on: RFA (OS) 14/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY WILL MATTER Reserved on: 10.12.2013 Pronounced on: 15.01.2014 RFA (OS) 14/2013 CAP. VIJAY KUMAR TREHAN.Appellant Through: Sh. Anil Amrit with
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R. B.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH ON THE 10 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R. B. IN R.F.A.No.1275/2007 BETWEEN R.F.A.No.1275/2007
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL NO.2/2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10 th DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR EXECUTION FIRST APPEAL NO.2/2012 BETWEEN: SRI.K.L.KHURANA AGED ABOUT 70
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA COMPA NO.25/2015 C/W COMPA NO.24/2015
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD. Present THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR. And THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD Dated this the 6 th day of August 2012 Present THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR And THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S.KEMPANNA Miscellaneous First Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO of 2019 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3415 of 2019 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 35553 OF 2016) DR. MANOHAR GANAPATHI RAVANKAR...APPELLANT Versus H. GURUNANDA
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004 1. Smti Jaya Handique, W/o. Late Dimbeswar Handique, 2. Sri Pradip Handique, 3. Sri Bipul Handique,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN. Writ Petition Nos /2017 (T-IT)
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN Writ Petition Nos.1339-1342/2017 (T-IT) Between : Flipkart
More information