In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S
|
|
- Jeffery Garrett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.141 of 2013 Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S Central Bureau of Investigation through its S.P, (A.C.B), Ranchi Opposite Party CORAM: HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr.S.N.Prasad For the C.B.I :Mr.M.Khan 13/ One writ application, vide W.P (PIL) No.1531 of 2011 was filed before this Court for issuance of mandamus directing the respondent-state including Vice-Chairman, Ranchi Regional Development Authority, Ranchi, and Chief Executive Officer, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi to remove unauthorized structure being used as go-down and shop constructed in the parking area of Chandralok Apartment. During hearing of the case, it was brought to the notice of the court that such permission has been granted by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority illegally in connivance with the builders and others not for one Apartment but in many of the Apartments. At the same time, it was also brought to the notice of the Court that number of multi storied buildings have been constructed by deviating from their sanctioned maps. Such deviation and alteration made with the connivance of the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority was taken by the Court not only a civil wrongs but also criminal offence as such a space dedicated to common use being used for other purposes amounts to encroachment to the rights of the others. Therefore, the Court did find it proper and appropriate to get the matter be investigated upon by the C.B.I. Accordingly, a formal letter was issued to the C.B.I to institute a case and to proceed with it against the persons
2 2 committed wrong in connivance with the officials of Ranchi Regional Development Authority. Accordingly, an FIR was lodged by the C.B.I against unknown persons under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 468, 471 and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(i)(d)of the Prevention of Corrupti9on Act and also under Section 52 of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001 as well as under Section 82 of the Registration Act. Having lodged the case, the C.B.I took up the investigation. During investigation, the matter relating to sanction of the building plans of M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited, Ranchi and M/s. Rani children Hospital and Research (P) Limited were also examined. In that course, it was found that one Dr.Rajesh Kumar, Director of M/s. Rani Children Hospital & Research Center (P) Limited and Dr.Sudhir Kumar, Director of M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited had purchased the lands bearing plot no.564, appertaining to Khata No.27 situated under Mouza Hatma from Sri Basant Toppo after getting permission in terms of the provision of Section 49 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act. After purchasing the land, M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited submitted building construction plan in the year 2008, upon which a case bearing B.C No.269 of 2008 was initiated. On submission of such plan, the applicant according to the case of the C.B.I became apprehensive that map may not be sanctioned as the land over which map was sought to be sanctioned was Public Open Space. Therefore, the plan was again submitted by M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited through M/s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner was one of the partners by showing the plot as plot no.568 upon which a case bearing B.C No.531 of 2008 was initiated.
3 3 In the said case, map was sanctioned by the Ranchi Regional Development Authority by showing plot no.564 as 568 as R.S.plot no.564 situated in Mouza Hatma was Public Open Space. The said map had been prepared under the supervision of this petitioner. In the said map, two roads were shown existing in front of the plot. One was shown to the north of the plot but in fact, no such road was existing. The other road was shown to be of width of 9 meter but, in fact, the land was recorded as Kaisare Hind and width of that road was never of 9 meters. According to the case of the prosecution, this was done by M/s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner is one of the partners to get the map of the building ( G+4 ) sanctioned in collusion with the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority. On such allegation, charge sheet was submitted against M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited and other persons including this petitioner as well as other partners of M/s. Grids Consultants so far building plan relating to M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited is concerned. Likewise, charge sheets were also submitted against other accused persons whose culpability was found in getting the map sanctioned for other buildings in contravention of the provisions of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority Act as well as Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Bye-laws, 2002 which was framed by the authority in terms of the provision of Ranchi Regional Development Authority Act, Upon submission of the charge sheet, the court took cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 478 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act s well as under Section 52 of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001.
4 4 Being aggrieved with that order, the petitioner has filed this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Mr.S.N.Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the C.B.I that under the supervision of this petitioner, an Architect, a lay out plan for construction of a building (G+4) was prepared which on its submission by the owner of the land got sanctioned by the authority of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority but the petitioner an Architect is being prosecuted on the premise that the land over which map was sanctioned happens to be the Public Open Space (POS) and that two roads were shown to have been approaching that land but in fact, only one road was in existence but this ground cannot be valid ground for prosecuting an Architect who is supposed to draw a map to be submitted by the owner before the authority of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority for its sanction as no law or regulation is there for fastening responsibility upon an Architect to make investigation over the nature of land before an Architect draws a plan. In this regard it was further submitted that in terms of the provision of Section 32 of the Act, the landlord is supposed to give a lay out plan on the basis of which an Architect is supposed to prepare a sketch map which is sanctioned in terms of the provision as contained in Section 37 of the Act if it is in accordance with the Act, Rule and Regulation. If the land owner on making any misrepresentation gets a map sanctioned, it is liable to be cancelled in terms of the provision as contained in Section 38 of the Act and even the building constructed on such map, can be demolished. Thus, it was submitted that if the map is sanctioned by making any misrepresentation, it is the owner who is to be held responsible and not the Architect. In spite of that, the petitioner is
5 5 being prosecuted which is quite illegal and hence the order taking cognizance is fit to be quashed. As against this, Mr. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I submits that when the C.B.I was directed by this Court to make investigation over the matter relating to the buildings constructed by making deviation from the map and also in the matter allowing the builders to use the space of common use for other purposes by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority, a case was registered. During investigation, it was found that building has been constructed over Public Open Space after the building plan submitted by M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited was sanctioned by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority. The building plan had been prepared by M/ s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner is one of the partners and under his supervision, the building plan had been prepared. The building plan was shown to have been prepared for construction of building over R.S. plot no.568 but in fact, it was R.S plot no.564 and that in order to have more floors in the building, two roads were shown to have been existing abutting the said plot but in fact, only one road was existing and that width of the road which was existing was shown more than its actual width so as to have have an additional floor which is certainly in contravention of the provisions of the Act and the bye-laws. The petitioner in such situation cannot take plea that it is none of his business to make any enquiry or investigation of the land before drawing building plan as the Architect under the provisions of the Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Bye-laws 2002 (Amended) is duty bound to see that the building plan which is prepared is in accordance with the provision of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority its regulation and bye-laws. If such responsibility has been fastened under the said bye-laws, even the Architect can be prosecuted it, it
6 6 is found that he by ignoring the provision of the Act, Rule and Regulation has prepared building plan. illegality. Thus, the order taking cognizance never suffers from any From the averment made on behalf of the parties what has emerged is that according to the petitioner, an Architect who prepares building plan is never supposed to make enquiry with respect to the land for which building plan has been prepared, rather building plan is prepared as per the instruction of the land owner whereas the stand which has been taken on behalf of the C.B.I is that even an Architect under the provision of bye-laws named as Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Byelaws, 2002 (Amended) is supposed to adhere to the provision of the Act, Rule and bye-laws. It be stated that it is the case of theprosectuion that building plan was prepared for construction of the building over the plot which had been delineated for Public Open Space and that two roads were shown to have been passing through the land in question but only one road was in existence and that width of the other road was shown more than its actual width so as to have have one additional floor over the building. The question does arise as to whether on account of it this an Architect can be held responsible for commission of the offence under which cognizance of the offence has been taken. In this regard, I may refer to clause c of appendix C of Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Byelaws, 2002 which reads as follows: C Architects who are registered under the council of Architects Act 1972 shall be entitled for a registration as a licensed Technical personnel of R.R.D.A without paying any annual licensing fee for the same. However, if they desire to be enrolled as life-time-licensee of the Authority, a lumpsum payment of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) shall have to be made to the Authority as a fee for such
7 7 enrolment, so that the Authority may be able to intimate them by post time-to-time about the provisions of planning standard and Building Byelaws and other relevant information with amendments (if any) in rules and Bye-laws of the Authority. But in case of Architect either already enrolled or likely to be enrolled in future as a R.R.D.A. Licensee, violates any of the rules, regulations, bye-laws and/or planning Standards of R.R.D.A, for the time being in force, his enrolment in R.R.D.A shall be cancelled and the enrolment fee of Rs.500/- charged initially from him shall be forfeited by the Authority. From its perusal, it does appear that an Architect who is registered under the Architect Act 1972 is entitled for a registration as a licensed Technical personnel of R.R.D.A. Further clause C-8 of the Bye-laws speaks about the duties and responsibilities of technical personnel. Relevant provision for the purpose of deciding the issue would be clause (a) and (g) of clause C-8.1 which reads as follows: (a) There shall be conversant with the provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipalities Act Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951, Bihar Restriction of Use of Land Act, 1948 Rules and Bye-laws made thereunder and as well as the Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001 and the regulations made therein and shall prepare plans, sections elevations and other structural details as per the requirements of the clauses above to prescribed scales marking clearly all the dimension etc. Furnishing the Area table and shall, draw specifications. Etc. (g) They shall be held responsible for work executed on site in contravention of provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipalities Act, 1922, Patna Municipal Corporation Act, Bihar Rstriction of Uses of Land Act, 1948, Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, Jharkhand Regiional Development Authority Act, 1982, 1975 and Rules and Bye-laws, framed thereunder. The aforesaid two provisions does stipulate that technical person must be conversant with the provision of not only Jharkhand
8 8 Regional Development Authority Act but other related acts, byelaws and rules so that any structural details be made in accordance with the Act and Rules. If there happens to be any contravention of the provision of the Act, Rules or Bye-laws in the matter of construction of the building, technical person can be held responsible. In such situation, the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner that an Architect cannot be held responsible for building plan being not in conformity with the provision of the Act, Rules and the Bye-laws, is not acceptable. However, it would be seen during trial as to whether the petitioner being an Architect was responsible or not in making building plan as according to the petitioner, the petitioner though was one of the partners of M/s. Grids Consultant but had nothing to do with preparation of building plan wherein it is the case of the C.B.I that under the supervision of this petitioner, building plan had been prepared. Under the situation, the order taking cognizance never warrants to be quashed. In the result, this application stands dismissed. However, before parting with this order, it be observed that any finding recorded for the purpose of disposal of this case may not be prejudicial to the case of the parties. ND/ ( R.R.Prasad, J.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 911 2007 Ejaj Ahmad Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Binay Kumar Opposite Parties CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner:
More informationIn the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.1533 of 2012 With Cr.M.P.No.1557 of 2012 V E R S U S CORAM: HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1533 of 2012 With Cr.M.P.No.1557 of 2012 1.M/s. Ramsarup Lohh Udyog 2.Ashish Jhunjhunwala... Petitioners(Cr.M.P.No.1533 of 2012) Dilip Didwania Petitioner
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.273 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.273 of 2015 Basant @ Bashant Harlalka, son of Sri Jagdish Harlalka Resident of Village Manoharpur, P.O.& P.S. Manoharpur District Singhbhum (West)......
More informationW.P. (C) No of 2005
-1- W.P. (C) No. 1992 of 2005 WITH W.P. (C) No. 3105 of 2007 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] By Court: Jharkhand State Electricity Board through Electrical
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4674 of 2012 Mahendra Kumar Ruiya................Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand through. 2. Gautam Kumar Dubey..........Opp. Parties ----------
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU. Before THE HON BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP)
1/13 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Between Dated this the 26 th day of October, 2016 Before THE HON BLE DR JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Writ Petition No.10976/2015 (LB-BMP) Mr. Jai M. Patil S/o
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3336 of 2015 M/S CORPORATE ISPAT ALLOYS LIMITED, HAVING ITS UNIT AT TOTATALWADI, P.O. BURUDIH, DISTRICT SARAIKELA KHARSAWAN, JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 520 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 520 of 2005 Fr. Mariya Packian S.J. Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972. BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009 Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January,2012 SUDESH KUMAR
More informationW.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Sita Soren Versus Union of India through C.B.I.. W.P. (Cr.) No. 128 of 2013 Petitioner Opp. Party Coram: The Hon ble Mr. Justice R.R.Prasad For the petitioner :
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.440/2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.440/2014 BETWEEN: MR.CHETAN SHAH, S/O SRI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT BAIL APPLN. 444/2012 Reserved on: 30th March, 2012 Decided on: 10th April, 2012 SUMIT TANDON Through: Mr. Ajay Burman, Advocate....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No. 4484 of 2008 Birendra Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Secretary, Foundary Forge Co-operative Society Ltd., Dhurwa, Ranchi CORAM: - HON BLE MR.
More informationHeard learned counsel for the parties.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27162 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh...... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar......
More informationOffences and Penalties and Compounding of certain offences
Offences and Penalties and Compounding of certain offences Q. 1 What are the offences and penalties under FCRA, 2010? Ans. Section 11 of the FCRA, 2010 prescribes that no person, save as otherwise provided
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 962 of 2006
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 962 of 2006 A.C. Sinha-- -- - - -- -- -- -- ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Factory Inspector, Jamshedpur, Circle-I, Jamshedpur,
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Criminal Petition 21 (AP)2017 Shri Nabam Epo, S/o Lt. Nabam Echo, R/o Tayang Tarang (Emchi) village,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 MariyamTirkey Petitioner (in WPS No. 506/13) Sudarshan Khakha Petitioner (in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.7/2014 BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No of 2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 3455 of 2013 M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad... Petitioner Versus Sri Arun Krishna Rao Hazare, Ex General Manager (HRD), Bharat Coking Coal
More informationTHE SEEDS ACT, 1966 (ACT NO. 54 OF 1966) An Act to provide for regulating the quality of certain seeds for sale, and for matters connected therewith
THE SEEDS ACT, 1966 (ACT NO. 54 OF 1966) [29 th December, 1966] An Act to provide for regulating the quality of certain seeds for sale, and for matters connected therewith BE it enacted by Parliament in
More informationJHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI (Case No.23/ ) QUORUM Shri Mukhtiar Singh, Chairperson Shri P. C. Verma, Member.
JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI (Case No.23/2007-08) IN THE MATTER OF QUORUM Shri Mukhtiar Singh, Chairperson Shri P. C. Verma, Member. An application for setting aside the letter
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5554 of 2007 1. Debiswar Soren 2. Chandu Soren 3. Balish Soren 4. Ram Lal Hembram 5. Gomeshwar Hembram Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 7068/2014 RAJINDER PAL MALIK... Petitioner Represented by: Dr. Jose P. Verghese and Mr. Jawahar Singh,
More informationCORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW J U D G M E N T
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL.) No.807 of 2014 Reserved on: 09.07.2014 Pronounced on:16.09.2014 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE... Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person with Ms. Suman
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 Sri Bhabesh Das Son of Late Dhruba Das Vill Kulhati, No.2 Hidalghurisupa Police
More informationDate of CAV : Pronounced on 11/2/2014. appellants against the order dated passed by Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc Appeal No. 224 of 2011 Abdul Hamid and others... Appellants State of Jharkhand and others Versus Respondents Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the
More informationTHE INTER-STATE MIGRANT WORKMEN (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT, (No. 30 of 1979)
THE INTER-STATE MIGRANT WORKMEN (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) ACT, 1979 (No. 30 of 1979) [11 th June, 1979] An Act to regulate the employment of inter-state migrant workmen and to
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,
More informationA.F.R. RESERVED ALONG WITH
(1) A.F.R. RESERVED Court No. - 58 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42123 of 2015 Petitioner :- Resident Welfare Association Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Dubey,Ananya Pandey,Anil
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY. WRIT PETITION No OF 2013 (LB-BBMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION No.14387 OF 2013 (LB-BBMP) BETWEEN: UNION OF INDIA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3996 of 2006 1. Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners Versus Steel Authority of India Limited and others Respondents
More informationCHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE SECTIONS 41 TO 50
CHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE SECTIONS 41 TO 50 7.1. Scope and scheme. CHAPTER 7 PENALTIES AND PROCEDURE: SECTIONS 41 TO 50. Chapter 7 of the Water Pollution Act contains provisions relating to penalties
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 CRL.M.C. 4102/2011 Judgment delivered on:9th December, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 CRL.M.C. 4102/2011 Judgment delivered on:9th December, 2011 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN & ORS... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sidhartha Luthra,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT MATTER Date of decision: 17th January, 2013 W.P.(C) 2730/2003 & CM No.4607/2013 (for stay) COL.V. KATJU Through: Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv....
More informationversus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 11, 2015 + BAIL APPLN. 1596/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.7527/2015 & 7810/2015 HARI SINGH Through: versus... Petitioner Mr.Deepak Prakash,
More informationTHE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986
THE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986 No. 63 of 1986 [ 23rd December, 1986. ] An Act to provide for the establishment of a Bureau for the harmonious development of the activities of standardisation,
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU GROUNDWATER (DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) ACT, 2003
THE TAMIL NADU GROUNDWATER (DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) ACT, 2003 (Tamil Nadu Act 3 of 2003) This document is available at www.ielrc.org/content/e0302.pdf An Act to protect groundwater resources to provide
More informationThe Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991
The Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991 This document is available at ielrc.org/content/e9109.pdf For further information, visit www.ielrc.org Note: This document is put online by the International
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN : DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK B HINCHIGERI J
More informationFOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976
FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976 [Act No. 49 of Year 1976] An Act to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain persons or associations,
More informationCase No. 2 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri Vijay L. Sonavane, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More informationCHAPTER I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II THE ADVISORY BOARDS
SECTIONS THE CONTRACT LABOUR (REGULATION AND ABOLITION) ACT, 1970 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. 3. Central Advisory
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 WP(C) No.14332/2004 Pronounced on : 14.03.2008 Sanjay Kumar Jha...
More information$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1050/2015 Judgment delivered on:10 th September, 2015 SWARAJ ALIAS RAJ SHRIKANT THACKREY... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Arvind K Nigam, Senior
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1051 of 2013 Umesh Prasad Gupta.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Birbal Singh Munda... Opposite Parties Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY.
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9985/2009. Versus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20 th August, 2010. + W.P.(C) 9985/2009 % SUNITI MADAN Through:... Petitioner Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate. NDMC Through: Versus... Respondent Mr.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2882/2005 M/s. Ladi Steel Industries Pvt. Limited, a private limited company duly incorporated under
More informationTHE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986
THE ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 986 No. 9 OF 986 [3rd May, 986.] An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected there with: WHEREAS the decisions were taken
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF 2014 Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No.- 833 of 2009 1. Nirmala Devi, wife of Madan Prasad Tiwary 2. Mirtunjay Kumar Tiwary, son of Madan Prasad Tiwary 3. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, son of Madan
More informationSTANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE INSPECTION
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE INSPECTION UPSIDA Bye Laws Section 2.7.0. SCRUTINY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT AMENDED PROVISIONS AS ON 29-05-2017 Navigate to OnlineUPSIDC.com-> Resource Centre-> Byelaws of UPSIDA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN WRIT PETITION NO.85369/2013 (GM-RES) ASHOK KADAPPA JADAGOUD
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: Date of Decision: versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 925/2015 Reserved on: 09.12.2015 Date of Decision: 18.12.2015 RAJESH KUMAR Through... Petitioner Mr.Sumit Kumar, Mr.Pulkit Agarwal & Mr.Palav Agarwal,
More informationTHE KARNATAKA OWNERSHIP FLATS (REGULATION OF THE PROMOTION OF CONSTRUCTION, SALE, MANAGEMENT AND TRANSFER) ACT, 1972
THE KARNATAKA OWNERSHIP FLATS (REGULATION OF THE PROMOTION OF CONSTRUCTION, SALE, MANAGEMENT AND TRANSFER) ACT, 1972 Sections: 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. General liabilities
More informationRULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF MEAT SHOPS IN NASHIK
1 RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF MEAT SHOPS IN NASHIK State: Maharashtra Details of licensing are as follows: Meat Shops are regulated as per the directions of Bombay Provincial Municipal
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.
More informationFOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976 [Act No. 49 of Year 1976]
FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976 [Act No. 49 of Year 1976] An Act to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain persons or associations,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(S) No of Bindeshwari Das Petitioner -V e r s u s- B.C.C.L. & Others Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(S) No. 6522 of 2004 Bindeshwari Das Petitioner -V e r s u s- B.C.C.L. & Others Respondents CORAM: - HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.G.R. PATNAIK. For the Petitioner
More informationORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH W.A. NO.122 OF 2014 In the matter of a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2014... Sri Kasinath Nayak. Petitioner -Versus- State
More informationFor the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar Bharti, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No.239 of 2011 Cardinal Telesphore P. Toppo @ Telesphore P. Cardinal Toppo...................Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Kendriya Sarna
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE. CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No /2009(Stay)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINA PROCEDURE CRL.REV.P. 523/2009 & Crl. M.A. No. 10941/2009(Stay) Reserved on: 17th February, 2012 Decided on: 1st March, 2012 YASHPAL KUMAR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.857 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(Crl.) No.387/2018)
1 Non Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.857 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(Crl.) No.387/2018) OM PRAKASH SINGH...APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE W.P.(C) 6034/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 16.07.2014 SANDEEP KUMAR... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.G. Sharma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD. Dated this the 31 st day of May Before THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE C.R.
:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD Dated this the 31 st day of May 2012 Before THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE C.R.KUMARASWAMY Criminal Petition No.7277/2011 C/w. Criminal Petition No.7278/2011
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8444/2011 Date of Decision: 29 th September, 2015 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY... Petitioner Through Mr.
More informationTHE KARNATAKA MARINE FISHING (REGULATION) ACT, 1986
THE KARNATAKA MARINE FISHING (REGULATION) ACT, 1986 KARNATAKA ACT No.24 OF 1986 (First published in the Karnataka Gazette Extraordinary dated 28th day of May, 1986) (Received the assent of the Governor
More information3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA WRIT PETITION NOS.
More informationThrough: Mr. Himansu Upadhyay, Mr. J.P. Sahrawat and Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT CRL.M.C.No.4077/2011 & Crl.M.A.Nos.19016/2011 & 3720/2012 Judgment reserved on :26th March, 2012 Judgment delivered on: 2nd
More informationBuilding permit fee, completion fees, temporary structures permit fees and calculations thereof:
BUILDING PERMIT BYE LAWS Building permit fee, completion fees, temporary structures permit fees and calculations thereof: 1. The applicant shall deposit building permit fees as stipulated by SIDA from
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 4022/2016 Sri David Brahma Son of Sri Biraj Brahma Resident of Kahilipara Journalist Colony Dakhin
More informationW.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH: AIZAWL W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013 1. Dawrpui Vengthar Pig Producer Co-operative Society Ltd., B-2
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Petition No. 359 of 2017 1. Sri Bijay Kumar Jalan, Son of Ramawatar Jalan, C/O Ganesh Narayan Gowardhan
More informationBar & Bench (
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 06.11.2017 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.28181 of 2017 & WMP.No.30311 of 2017 Mr.Thiagarajan Kumararaja...Petitioner Vs 1.Union
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment reserved on:07.02.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 10.02.2012 W.P.(C) 734/2012 Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Another Petitioners Versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner
More informationReserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C.1761/2009 Reserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010 # KAMAL GOYAL.... Petitioner! Through: Mr.Vikas Mahajan & Mr.Vishal Mahajan,
More informationTHE BIHAR GOSHALA ACT,
1 THE BIHAR GOSHALA ACT, 1950] 1 (Bihar Act 28 of 1950) (President's assent published in the Bihar Gazette of the 27th September, 1950) An Act to provide for better management and control of Goshalas in
More informationTHE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952
SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. THE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952 ARRANGMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 2A. Construction of references to any law not in force or any functionary
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NO OF 2011(LB-BMP)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 10 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY WRIT PETITION NO.41274 OF 2011(LB-BMP) BETWEEN: ASTRAZENECA PHARMA INDIA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. CRLMC No Of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3031 Of 2006 An application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with G.R. Case No.844 of 2003 pending on the file of S.D.J.M.,
More informationAjoy Kumar Ghose vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 18 March, 2009
Supreme Court of India Author: V.S.Sirpurkar Bench: Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar 1 "REPORTABLE" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.485 OF 2009 (Arising
More information(Oral : V.K. Shukla, J.)
AFR Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 59959 of 2016 Petitioner :- Mohd. Farid Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohan Gupta,Dharmendra Singh Counsel for Respondent
More informationCORAM : HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal(DB)No.458 of 2014 Santosh Sahu son of Sri Aklu Sahu, resident of village Arya, PO & PS-Kisko, District-Lohardaga.... Appellant -Versus- The State of
More informationBAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA & GOA
1 BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA & GOA. It is hereby notified for general information that the Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa in exercise of powers in sections 6 r/w. Section 15 of the Advocates Act, in
More informationRULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF BARBER SHOPS IN BANGALORE
1 RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF BARBER SHOPS IN BANGALORE State: Karnataka Details of licensing are as follows: Barber Shops are regulated as per the directions of Karnataka Municipal
More informationOffences and Penalties
Chapter XVII Offences and Penalties Penalty for certain offences (Section 122) Section 122 of CGST Act, made applicable to IGST vide Section 20 of IGST Act and Q1. Whether penalty is imposable for supply
More informationTHE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES (FACILITATION) ACT,
1 THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES (FACILITATION) ACT, 2002 Arrangement of Sections Statement of Objects and Reasons Sections: 1. Short title and commencement 2. Definitions 3. State High Level Clearance Committee
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Reserved on: % Date of Decision: WP(C) No.7084 of 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 25.11.2013 % Date of Decision: 28.11.2013 + WP(C) No.7084 of 2010 PARAS NATURAL SPRING WATER PVT. LTD. Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv.... Petitioner
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
More informationTHE PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
SECTIONS THE PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Appointment of Controlling Authority. 4. Persons or Private
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Negotiable Instruments Act. Judgement reserved on: January 07, 2009
(1) Crl.M.C. No. 3011/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Negotiable Instruments Act Judgement reserved on: January 07, 2009 Judgement delivered on: January 13, 2009 (2) Crl.M.C. No.
More informationCase No. 111 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI. R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI R.F.A.No.1767 OF 2012 (INJ) BETWEEN: Smt.Sarvamangala L.M., D/o
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO.1723 OF 2009 Petitioner: Sri Sailendra Nath Kakati, Son of late Loknath Kakati, Resident
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: Versus...
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012 SANDEEP DIXIT Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate.... PETITIONER STATE Through: Ms.Fizani Husain,
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JUNE, 2016 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100004/2016 BETWEEN: SMT.SHAKUNTALA W/O
More information