The Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the Vaughan Committee of Adjustment for the year 2001 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 22, :08p.m.

Transcription

1 The Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the Vaughan Committee of Adjustment for the year 2001 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2001 Present at the meeting were: 6:08p.m. M. Mauti T. DeCicco K Hakoda Members of Staff present: Dianne E.L. Grout, Secretary-Treasurer Cathy Schanck, Assistant to the Secretary-Treasurer Armine Hassakourians, Planner Margaret Sitarz, Plans Examiner Gregory Seganfreddo, Plans Examiner INTRODUCTION OF ADDENDUM REPORTS That the addendum reports be incorporated into the minutes and be on view at the back of the room in the Report Book. CARRIED DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST T. DeCicco declared a conflict of interest with respect to Items #8 & 9, File Nos. B88/01 & A332/01, ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA, as he owns lands abutting the property. ADOPTION OR CORRECTION OF MINUTES THAT the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment Meeting of November 8, 2001, be adopted as circulated. CARRIED ADJOURNMENTS AND/OR DEFERRALS A letter was received from Lucy Giacona, the owner, requesting that Item #10, LUCY & GIOVANNI GIACONA, File No. A361/01, BE ADJOURNED to the December 6, 2001 Meeting, requiring more time to coordinate with Building and By-law Departments to issue a measurement as previously requested on September 20, 2001 by the Committee. Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT Item # 10, LUCY & GIOVANNI GIACONA, File No. A361/01, BE ADJOURNED to December 6, 2001 Meeting. CARRIED ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS NONE Page 1 of 17

2 1. FILE NO: A198/01 SEVENBRIDGE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (Previously adjourned from Aug. 23/01 & Oct. 4/01 Meetings) Part of Lot 6, Concession 5, (Northeast corner of Edgeley Blvd. and Highway #7). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel C9 - (H) Corporate Centre Zone (Holding). The purpose of this application is to permit the construction of a proposed one-storey commercial (retail) building, notwithstanding, the minimum number of parking spaces provided will be 203, rather than the By-law requires the minimum number of parking spaces be 236, and the minimum landscape strip will be 2.35m., rather than 6.0m. Mike Tucci, appeared as the agent and had nothing to add to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies and any conditions requested are listed below. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are Seconded by T. De Cicco THAT Application No. A198/01 SEVENBRIDGE DEVELOPMENTS LTD., be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That if other variances are required, that they be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 2. FILE NO. A252/01 GIOVANNI SALVATORE (Previously adjourned from Sept. 20/01, OCT. 4/01 & Oct. 25/01 Meetings ) Part of Lot 21, Concession 4, ( Lot 52, Registered Plan No. 65M-3022, municipally known as 339 Glenkindie Avenue, Maple). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel AR2" Residential. Page 2 of 17

3 FILE NO:A252/01 GIOVANNI SALVATORE CONT D The purpose of this application is to request variances to permit the maintenance of an existing one-storey accessory building, (garden shed), not to exceed 6m 2 in area and 2.5m in height, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback is 0.31m., the minimum interior side yard setback is 0.45m., and the maximum height is 2.68m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum rear yard setback to be 0.6m., and the minimum interior side yard setback to be 0.6m., and the maximum height to be 2.5m. Nick Riccio, appeared as the agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. He explained that both the By-law Enforcement Department and the Buildings Standards Department had visited his property to re-measure the shed and address the concerns of his neighbour, Mr. Bruno. The application was amended and recirculated for the added height variance as a result of this visit. He submitted photos showing that there was not an overhang onto his neighbour s property. A fax was received from Mr. Santo Bruno, 46 Oban Avenue, Maple, Ontario, L6A 2E2, stating that he would not be able to attend the meeting, but that he hoped the matter would be rectified. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. Seconded by T. De Cicco THAT Application No. A252/01 GIOVANNI SALVATORE, be APPROVED. It should be noted that T. De Cicco left the Council Chambers and did not take part in the next items. CONSENT & 3. & 4. FILE NOS.: B88/01 & A332/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA Part of Lots 25 & 26, Concession 8, (Lot 51, Registered Plan No. 65M-3377, municipally known as 1 Treelawn Blvd., Kleinburg). B88/01- The purpose of the application is to request the consent of the Committee of Adjustment to convey a parcel of land marked "A" on the attached sketch for the creation of a new lot for residential purposes, and retain the lands marked AB@ on the attached sketch for residential purposes. Both the subject lands and retained lands are currently vacant. By-law 1-88 zones both the subject lands and retained lands as AR1@ Residential. This file was heard in conjunction with Minor Variance Application No. A332/01. Page 3 of 17

4 CONSENT & FILE NOS.: B88/01 & A332/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA CONT D A332/01- The purpose of this application is to request a variance to facilitate the severance of the total lands (File No. B88/01-subject land), notwithstanding, a single family detached dwelling may be erected on the newly created lot, whereas the By-law states that no more than one (1) single family detached dwelling may be erected on the entire lot (both subject and retained lands). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel AR1" Residential. This file was heard in conjunction with Consent Application No. B88/01. A fax of opposition was received from Diana A. Foggia, Student at Law, Capo, Sgro, Di Lena, Hemsworth, Mendicino, L.L.P., 7050 Weston Road, Suite 400, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 8G7, on behalf of Anthony Romano, owner of Lot 50, the lot adjoining Lot 51. A fax of opposition was received from Dr. Puran Luke, P.O. Box 520, Islington Avenue, Kleinburg, Ontario, L0J 1C0. A letter of opposition was received from Mr. John McMahon, Kleinburg and Area Ratepayers Association, P.O. Box 202, Kleinburg, Ontario, L0J 1C0. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments: Since the Zoning By-law specifically states one single detached dwelling per lot, the Community Planning Department does not support Variance Application A332/01, which is required to facilitate the proposed Consent Application. This department is of the opinion that the change to the Zoning By-law to facilitate this consent should be considered by way of an application to amend to Zoning By-law. The Consent application is premature until such time that Council has considered the Zoning Amendment Application. Doug Skeffington, appeared as the agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. He addressed the opposition letter received from Anthony Romano. He explained that although Mr. La Posta had discussions with Mr. Romano, nothing had been resolved to date. Mr. Anthony Romano appeared in opposition and reiterated the points made on his previously submitted fax, explaining that he had gone to great lengths designing his home with the thought that there would not be a home as close to his property. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies and any conditions requested are listed below. Seconded by M. Mauti THAT Application No. B88/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA, be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. Payment to the City of Vaughan of a Tree Fee if required, approved by Council as of the date of granting the consent. Payment is to be made by certified cheque, to the satisfaction of the Finance Department and Parks Department; 2. That the owner shall pay all taxes as levied, if required, to the satisfaction of the Finance Department; (contact Linda Nelson in the Finance Department to have this condition cleared). Page 4 of 17

5 CONSENT & FILE NOS.: B88/01 & A332/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA CONT D 3. The applicant shall provide the City of Vaughan with an appraisal report and valuation of the subject land (land only) to be prepared by an accredited appraiser, if required. Payment of a Parkland levy to the City in lieu of the deeding of land for park purposes shall be made if a new lot is being created. Said levy is to be 5% of the appraised market value of the subject land as of the date of the Committee of Adjustment giving notice to the Applicant of the herein decision. Said levy shall be approved by the Manager of Real Estate. Payment shall be made by certified cheque only; 4. That Minor Variance Application A332/01, ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA, be approved and be in full force and effect; 5. That approval shall be granted subject to Vaughan Council allocating sewage and water capacity to the subject severed lot, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department; 6. That the Subdivision Drawings and Subdivision Agreement for the corresponding Subdivision be amended accordingly, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department and prior to the approval of this consent application; 7. That access off Treelawn Boulevard to the subject severed lot and the retained parcel shall be to the satisfaction to the Transportation section of the Engineering Department; 8. Submission to the Secretary-Treasurer of three (3) white prints of a registered deposited reference plan of survey, showing the subject land which conforms with the application submitted and which shows the dimensions and areas of each part shown on the plan; 9. Upon fulfilling and complying with all of the above-noted conditions, and only if required, the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment must be provided with three (3) copies of the Transfer/Deed of Land for the subject land to be stamped accordingly; or may provide a Certificate to the Applicant stating the Consent has been given in certain cases; When submitting Deeds please provide a Schedule Page which includes the legal description of the lands in question for stamping purposes. Failure to provide this Schedule page will result in the delay of stamping the Deeds until it is received 10. A fee of $ made payable to the Treasurer City of Vaughan shall, be submitted to the Secretary Treasurer for the issuance of the Certificate/stamping of the deeds. It will be necessary to allow up to three (3) working days after all conditions have been fulfilled and documentation filed. Same day service is also available for an additional cost of $100.00, provided all conditions of approval have been fulfilled and all required documents are submitted by 11:30am. that day; 11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, if required, the applicant shall fulfill and comply with all of the above noted consent conditions; PLEASE NOTE: 1. That the payment of the Regional Development Charge is payable to the City of Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Regional Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment. CONSENT & Page 5 of 17

6 FILE NOS.: B88/01 & A332/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA CONT D 2. That the payment of the City Development Charge is payable to the City of Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the City's Development Charges By-law in effect at the time of payment. 3. That the payment of the Education Development Charge is payable to the City of Vaughan before issuance of a building permit in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Boards of Education By-laws in effect at the time of payment. 4. That the payment of a Water Infrastructure Fee is payable to the City of Vaughan before issuance of a building permit(s) in accordance with the Regional Municipal Servicing Agreement dated October 25, That the payment of a Sewer Infrastructure Fee is payable to the City of Vaughan before issuance of a building permit(s) in accordance with the Regional Municipal Servicing Agreement, dated October 25, Seconded by M. Mauti THAT Application No. A332/01 ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA, be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That Consent Application B88/01, ANGELO & CHERRYL LA POSTA, be approved and be in full force and effect; 2. That approval shall be granted subject to Vaughan Council allocating sewage and water capacity to the subject severed lot, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department; 3. That the Subdivision Drawings and Subdivision Agreement for the corresponding Subdivision be amended accordingly, if required, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department and prior to the approval of this consent application; 4. That access off Treelawn Boulevard to the subject severed lot and the retained parcel shall be to the satisfaction to the Transportation section of the Engineering Department; 5. That if the conditions listed above are not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. T. De Cicco returned to the Chambers for the rest of the hearing. Page 6 of 17

7 5. FILE NO: A362/01 ANGELO & LILLIAN GALLO Part of Lot 27, Concession 5, (Lot 11, Registered Plan 65M-3001, municipally known as 101 Abbruzze Court, Woodbridge). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel ARR" Rural Residential Zone. The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of a private swimming pool to an existing 1 ½ storey single family detached dwelling with attached garage, notwithstanding, the pool will be located partially in the interior side yard and partially in the rear yard, rather than the By-law requires a private swimming pool to be constructed only in the rear yard. Stan Sota, appeared as the agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies. Seconded by T. DeCicco THAT Application No. A362/01 ANGELO & LILLIAN GALLO, be APPROVED. 6. FILE NO:A363/01 KRISHAN SHARMA Part of Lot 17, Concession 8, (Part of Lot 227, Registered Plan 65M-3274, municipally known as 200 Sonoma Boulevard.) By-law 1-88 zones this parcel RV3" Residential Urban Village. The purpose of this application is to request variances to permit the maintenance of an existing pool equipment shed, notwithstanding, the minimum rear and interior side yard setbacks to the accessory shed are 0.10m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum rear yard setback to the accessory shed to be 7.5m, and the interior side yard setback to be 1.2m. Page 7 of 17

8 FILE NO:A363/01 KRISHAN SHARMA CONT D Frank Greco, appeared as the agent on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission regarding the request. He also submitted photos and a petition of support from the following people: Pasquale Renzi, 149 Mathewson Street, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1B9; Mario Pace, 48 Sonny Street, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1B7; Betty Sorenti, 208 Sonoma Blvd., Vaughan, Ontario, L4H 1P2; Emilio Rea, 1 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Lorenzo Vaglica, 5 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Livia Evangelista, 9 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Robert Saullo, 15 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Danny Iannello, 27 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Joan Attardo, 38 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Vince Arnone, 42 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Onofrio Buttice, 50 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5; Rob Pagnani, 46 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5. Suzanne Baresich, 30 David Todd Avenue, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P5, appeared in opposition, stating she had concerns regarding the shed being too close to the lot line, possible drainage problems, loss of privacy, and devalued property. Johnson Wright, 204 Sonoma Blvd., Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1P2, appeared in opposition concerned with possible drainage problems. Mr. Greco, responded by referring to the submitted photos that he felt clearly showed there was not any overhang onto the neighbour s properties. The Community Planning Department made the following written comments: Given the magnitude of the requested variances from the By-law requirement, this department does not consider this application to meet the intent of the Zoning By-law, and that they did not support the application. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are THAT Application No. A363/01 KRISHAN SHARMA, be APPROVED. 7. FILE NO: A307/01 JOSE & MARIA DA SILVA Part of Lot 24, Concession 4, (Lot 17, Registered Plan No. 65M-3095, municipally known as 58 Kettle Court, Maple). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel R3 Residential. Page 8 of 17

9 FILE NO: A307/01, JOSE & MARIA DA SILVA CONT D The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of an enclosed area under an existing wooden deck at the rear of the two storey single family dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum setback to OS1, Open Space Conservation Zone will be 8.0m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum setback to OS1, Open Space Conservation Zone to be 10.0m. Jose DaSilva, the owner, appeared and had nothing to add to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. MOVED by L. Fluxgold THAT Application No. A307/01, JOSE & MARIA DA SILVA, be APPROVED. 8. FILE NOS.: A312/01 & A333/01 &9. GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP. Part of Lot 12, Concession 2, (Lots 26 & 27, Registered Plan No. 65M-3523, municipally known as 92 & 96 Napa Hill Court, Thornhill). S By-law 1-88 zones these parcels RV4 (WS), Residential Urban Village Zone Four. A312/01 - The purpose of this application is to requested a variance to permit the construction of two storey detached single family dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum interior side yard setback will be 0.9m., where the abutting interior side yard setback is not 1.2m., rather than the By-law requires that where a single detached dwelling is constructed on a lot, the minimum interior side yard on one side can be reduced to 0.6m, where it abuts a minimum interior side yard of 1.2m, except where it abuts a non-residential use, including a walkway. A333/01 - The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of two storey detached single family dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum interior side yard setback will be 0.6m., where the abutting interior side yard setback is not 1.2m., rather than the By-law requires that where a single detached dwelling is constructed on a lot, the minimum interior side yard on one side can be reduced to 0.6m, where it abuts a minimum interior side yard of 1.2m, except where it abuts a non-residential use, including a walkway. Richard Vink, the agent, appeared on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief submission in regard to the requests. He explained the reasons regarding the necessity of an additional application. When asked by the Committee if the new owners were aware of the applications, he stated they were but that he did not have anything in writing from the new owners. Page 9 of 17

10 FILE NOS.: A312/01 & A333/01, GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP. CONT D The Community Planning Department made the following written comment: Variance Application A312/01 is proposing a reduced side yard of 0.95m, which will abut the reduced 0.65m side yard of Variance Application A333/01. The resulting combined side yards will be 1.6m. This does not meet the combined side yards of 1.8m, which would occur as per the By-law requiring a reduced 0.6m side yard abutting a 1.2m side yard, and that they do not support the applications. There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. THAT Application No. A312/01 GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP., be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions; 1. That Minor Variance Application A333/01, GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP., be approved and be in full force and effect; 2. That a permit be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 3. That a maintenance easement be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 4. That if the conditions listed above are not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. THAT Application No. A333/01 GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP., be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That Minor Variance Application A312/01, GRANDSTAND REALTY CORP., be approved and be in full force and effect; 2. That a maintenance easement be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 3. That if the conditions listed above are not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. Page 10 of 17

11 10. FILE NO.: A329/ ONTARIO LTD. Part of Lot 12, Concession 5, (Block 51, Registered Plan No. 65M-2854, municipally known as 133 Romina Drive). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel EM1" Prestige Employment Area. The purpose of this application is to request variances to permit the construction of a one storey industrial building, notwithstanding, the minimum side yard setback will be 4.5m., minimum parking spaces will be 22, rather than the By-law requires the minimum side yard setback of 6.0m., and the minimum parking spaces of 28. Sandro Soscia, the agent, appeared on behalf of the applicant and had nothing to add to the requests. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are Seconded by T. De Cicco THAT Application No. A329/01, ONTARIO LTD., be APPROVED. 11. FILE NO: A330/01 MARKGROVE ESTATES Part of Lot 11, Concession 2, (Lot 224, Registered Plan 65M-3521, municipally known as 106 Bentoak Crescent, Thornhill). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel RVM1 (WS-B) Residential Urban Village Multiple Dwelling Zone One (Single Detached Dwelling and Semi-Detached Dwelling on a Wide and Shallow Lot). The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of a two storey single family detached dwelling with attached garage, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback will be 4.96m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum rear yard setback of 6.0m. Aldo Mirigello, the agent, appeared on behalf of the applicant and had nothing to add to the request. Page 11 of 17

12 FILE NO: A330/01, MARKGROVE ESTATES CONT D There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. Seconded by T. De Cicco THAT Application No. A330/01, MARKGROVE ESTATES, be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a building permit be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 12. FILE NO: A331/01 ANTONIO & ROSETTA CUPANI Part of Lot 21, Concession 4, (Part of Lot 632, Registered Plan No. 65M-2086, municipally known as 38 Sonny Street). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel AR3" Residential. The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the maintenance of an existing gazebo, notwithstanding, the minimum rear yard setback is 4.6m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum rear yard setback to an accessory structure exceeding 6m2, to be 7.5m. Antonio Cupani, the owner,appeared and had nothing to add to the request. Mario Pace, 48 Sonny Street, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1B7, appeared in opposition stating concerns that no building permit was issued, a shed did not appear on the sketch submitted, and that his view was blocked. Pasquale Renzi, 149 Mathewson Street, Maple, Ontario, L6A 1B9, appeared in support, claiming he felt his view was enhanced. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. Page 12 of 17

13 FILE NO: A331/01, ANTONIO & ROSETTA CUPANI CONT D THAT Application No. A331/01 ANTONIO AND ROSETTA CUPANI be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a building permit must be applied for is the structure exceeds 10m 2, if required, to the satisfaction of the Septic System Inspection Division of the Building Standards Department; 2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 13. FILE NO: A334/01 MICHAEL SERRUYA Part of Lot 30, Concession 1, ( Lot 32, Plan No.M-4061, municipally known as 98 Thornridge Drive, Thornhill). The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of a two storey single family detached dwelling, with attached garage; at the rear of the dwelling will be a concrete deck on the ground floor extending to an unenclosed / uncovered balcony on the second floor; notwithstanding, the maximum lot coverage will be 22.6%, rather than the By-law requires maximum lot coverage of 20.0%. Roy Segal, appeared as the agent on behalf of the applicant and had nothing to add to the request. Terry Goodwin, 122 Thornridge Drive, Thornhill, Ontario, L4J 1E3, appeared in support of the application. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. Page 13 of 17

14 FILE NO: A334/01, MICHAEL SERRUYA CONT D THAT Application No. A334/01 MICHAEL SERRUYA, be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant obtain a Building permit, if required, to the satisfaction of the Building Standards Department; 2. That the variance be conditional upon the proposed being constructed in accordance with the requested variance as shown on the attached sketch. Furthermore, that the maximum lot coverage not exceed 20% for the footprint of the dwelling, and the requested increase of 2.6% lot coverage only apply to the balcony area. 3. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 14. FILE NO: A335/01 ROBERT & GIULIANA DARDENGO Part of Lot 14, Concession 8, (Lot 5, Registered Plan No. 65M-2988, municipally known as 135 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel AR1@ Residential. The purpose of this application is to request variances to permit the maintenance of a two storey single family detached dwelling with attached garage, notwithstanding, the interior side yard setback to the accessory shed is 0.6m., rear yard setback to the accessory shed is 0.9m, rather than the By-law requires minimum interior side yard setback to the accessory shed of 1.5m, and rear yard setback to the accessory shed of 7.5m. Letters of support were received from Tony Castaldi, 144 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G9; Wayne McCullough, 488 Vaughan Mills Road, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G7; Joe & Rita Miotto, 500 Vaughan Mills Road, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G7; Fiore & Nancy Spirzziri, 147 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G9; Joe & Nicole Ceccarelli, 141 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G9; Santo & Ada Gelmo, 494 Vaughan Mills Road, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G7. Robert Dardengo, the owner, appeared and gave a brief submission in regard to the request, explaining that he was not aware of any contravention to the By-law. He did move his shed to accommodate the complaint of his next door neighbour fourteen months later when the By-law Enforcement Department notified him that a complaint had been registered. Page 14 of 17

15 FILE NO: A335/01, ROBERT & GIULIANA DARDENGO CONT D Eric Candido, 129 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1B4, appeared in opposition. He submitted photos and reiterated the concerns raised in his letter. Joe Ceccarelli, 141 Deerchase Circle, Woodbridge, Ontario, L4H 1G9, appeared in support. The Committee asked if Mr. Dardengo would be willing to plant cedars in order to screen the shed, to which he stated he would. There was no one else in attendance either in support of or in opposition to the request. There were no other objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are THAT Application No. A335/01 ROBERT & GIULIANA DARDENGO, be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions. 1. That the applicant plant cedars in order to screen the shed, to the satisfaction of the Urban Design Department. 2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 15. FILE NO: A336/01 LIUDMILA GURFINKEL Part of Lot 7, Concession 2, ( Part of Lot 118, Registered Plan 65M-2699, municipally known as 83 Beverley Glen Boulevard). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel AR3@ Residential. The purpose of this application is to request variances to permit the continued construction of an in-ground pool, notwithstanding, the pool is partly located in the interior side yard, rather than the By-law requires that a private pool be constructed only in the rear yard, and the minimum exterior side yard setback to the pool is 1.5m, rather than 4.5m. Michael Gurfinkel, the owner, appeared and had nothing to add to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies, and any conditions are listed below. FILE NO: A336/01, LIUDMILA GURFINKEL CONT D Page 15 of 17

16 The Committee is of the opinion that the variances sought can be considered minor and are Seconded by T. De Cicco THAT Application No. A336/01, LIUDMILA GURFINKEL be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a building permit be obtained, if required, to the satisfaction of the Septic System Inspection Division of the Building Standards Department; 2. That if the condition listed above is not fulfilled within twelve (12) months of the date this decision becomes final and binding, the said decision shall expire and shall be deemed to have been annulled and rescinded by the Committee. 16. FILE NO: A337/01 LINDA D. HARRIS Part of Lot 2, Concession 1, (Lot 1, Plan M-1595, municipally known as 10 Putting Green Crescent, Kleinburg). By-law 1-88 zones this parcel RR Rural Residential. The purpose of this application is to request a variance to permit the construction of a two storey addition, to an existing two storey single family dwelling, notwithstanding, the minimum front yard setback will be 12.7m., rather than the By-law requires the minimum front yard setback to be 15.0m. Gary Cascone, the agent, appeared on behalf of the applicant and had nothing to add to the request. There were no objections from any Departments or Agencies. THAT Application No. A337/01 LINDA D. HARRIS, be APPROVED. OTHER BUSINESS Page 16 of 17

17 None. MOTION TO ADJOURN THAT the meeting of Committee of Adjustment be adjourned at 7:32 p.m., and the next regular meeting will be held on DECEMBER 6, Page 17 of 17