IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2012] NZHC TIMOTHY KYLE GARNHAM Appellant
|
|
- Darren Owen
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2012] NZHC 3447 BETWEEN AND TIMOTHY KYLE GARNHAM Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 18 December 2012 Counsel: D A Ewen for Appellant E M Light for Respondent Judgment: 18 December 2012 In accordance with r 11.5 I direct the Registrar to endorse this judgment with the delivery time of 3.00pm on the 18 th day of December RESERVED JUDGMENT OF COLLINS J Introduction [1] On 2 October 2012 Mr Garnham was convicted by Justices of the Peace of failing to give information about the driver of his vehicle. This is an offence under ss 52(6) and 118 of the Land Transport Act 1998 (the Act). Mr Garnham was disqualified from driving for three months, fined $600 and ordered to pay court costs of $ He appeals against both his conviction and the penalty that was imposed. Background [2] Mr Garnham was at all material times the owner of a Nissan Skyline registration FJJ103. GARNHAM V NEW ZEALAND POLICE HC WN CRI [18 December 2012]
2 [3] At about 3.40pm on 14 September 2011, passers-by observed a vehicle with that registration number doing a burnout on a road in Waikanae. [4] On 21 October 2011, a police officer spoke to Mr Garnham about the incident. He accepted that he was the owner of the vehicle but said that he was not the driver at the time, because he was suspended from driving. He said that he had lent the car to another person for a test-drive. Later the same day, the police gave Mr Garnham a notice pursuant to s 52(6) 1 and s of the Act requiring him to provide them with information about the identity of the driver. This notice required a response within 14 days. [5] Mr Garnham failed to provide police with the information that was sought. He was accordingly charged under ss 52(6) and 118 of the Act. [6] When his case was called in the Porirua District Court on 20 June 2012 it was noted on the information that he was entering a not guilty plea and that the case was adjourned until 4 July 2012 to allow driver info to be provided to police... If this complied with police will withdraw charge. [7] In her written submissions, Ms Light, counsel for the police explained: There is some information on the police file that appears to have been provided to police in July 2012 [the specific date is not recorded]. There is a list of phone numbers. The appellant told police when he was spoken to in 2011 that he was selling his car and someone who was test-driving it must have been driving. The list of numbers has no names and was in any case Contravening notices, requirements, etc, given or imposed by enforcement officers... (6) A person commits an offence if the person fails or refuses to provide information or provides false information with respect to any request for information made by an enforcement officer under section Owner or hirer or licence holder to give information as to identity of driver or passenger (1) If an enforcement officer has reasonable cause to believe that the driver of a vehicle has committed an offence while in charge of the vehicle, the officer may request the owner or hirer of the vehicle to give all information in his or her possession or obtainable by him or her which may lead to the identification and apprehension of the driver of the vehicle.... (3) A request under subsection (1) or subsection (2) [or subsection (6)] may be made orally or in writing and the owner or hirer or licence holder (as the case may be) must comply with the request within 14 days.
3 provided well outside the 14 day period and outside of the six month limitation period for laying an information for the suspected offence of sustained loss of traction. [8] Unfortunately, this information was not made available to the Justices of the Peace hearing Mr Garnham s case. They were accordingly deprived of the opportunity of determining whether in fact Mr Garnham gave all information in his possession or obtainable by him which may have led to the identification of the driver of the vehicle. Mr Garnham s appeal [9] Mr Garnham s notice of appeal appeared to be confined to an appeal against sentence. The notice of appeal suggested that: (1) although his appeal has been filed out of time it is just and reasonable for his appeal to be heard; (2) that the disqualification was unlawful; and (3) the fine was wrong in fact and law. However, the appeal was conducted as an appeal against both conviction and sentence. I will address the issues raised by the appeal in the following order: (1) Appeal out of time; (2) Appeal against sentence; and (3) Appeal against conviction. Appeal out of time [10] The jurisdiction to allow the hearing of an appeal out of time is governed by s 123 of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957.
4 [11] The criteria for allowing the hearing of an appeal out of time were helpfully explained by Thorp J in Clegg s Ltd v Department of Internal Affairs 3 and subsequently reaffirmed many other cases. 4 [12] Having considered all the relevant circumstances I have decided to allow Mr Garnham the opportunity to argue his appeal out of time because in my assessment there is a real risk that a miscarriage of justice may arise if Mr Garnham is denied the opportunity to advance his grounds of appeal. Appeal against sentence Was the disqualification lawful? [13] Mr Garnham argues that as he was convicted under ss 52 and 118 of the Act and that only those provisions govern the penalty which can be imposed. Section 52(7) states that the maximum penalty for an offence under s 52 is a fine not exceeding $20,000. [14] However, s 80 of the Act also provides: 80 General penalty of disqualification may be imposed if offence involves road safety (1) If a person is convicted of an offence against this Act, and the court is satisfied that the offence relates to road safety, the court may order that the person be disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver licence for such period as the court thinks fit. (2) The power conferred by subsection (1) is in addition to, and does not limit, any other powers of the court. [15] The question, then, is whether offending under s 52(6) relates to road safety. The leading case on that seems still to be Husband v Napier City Council Clegg s Ltd v Department of Internal Affairs HC Auckland M1032/84, 5 September See, for example, Hill v Ministry of Fisheries [2012] NZHC 511, Te Rito v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHC 1872, Ravelich v Police HC Auckland CRI , 21 July 2011 and Virendra v Police HC Wellington CRI , 27 September 2011 at [5]-[6]. Husband v Napier City Council [1979] 1 NZLR 317 (CA).
5 The offence in that case was refusing to accompany a Police officer after having refused a breath-alcohol test. The Court of Appeal said: 6 In broad terms the test [for whether an offence relates to road safety ] must depend upon an examination of all the circumstances surrounding a particular offence in order to discover whether in a practical way the conduct giving rise to that offence did relate to road safety and to the legislative effort which is reflected in the Act and the regulations designed to support that objective. In saying that it needs to be emphasised on the one hand that actual and present conditions of safety on the particular occasion are not essential. On the other there must be a clear relation between the conduct itself and road safety in the sense that the one can be or is affected by the other. [16] In Eskdale v Ministry of Transport, 7 Doogue J found that offences under s 68B(1) and (3) of the Transport Act 1962 (failing to give information leading to the identification of a driver of a vehicle) relate to road safety. The Judge found: 8 In the present case a check of drivers was being carried out in relation to the pursuit of road safety in respect of the apprehension of drivers who might be under the influence of alcohol. The Appellant, by failing to make known the identity of the driver, failed to enable the enforcement officers to take steps to ensure that the driver was apprehended. This apprehension appears to me to have related directly to road safety at that time. It also relates to the wider issue of road safety. I can see no distinguishing features between the present case and Dixon's case, supra, even although the facts are slightly different. Accordingly, so far as the issue of principle is concerned, I must find against Mr Roose.... In my view of the matter, whilst the relationship between the offence and the issue of road safety may not be a relationship between a driving offence and road safety as was discussed in Willis s case, supra, it comes within the broad middle ground discussed in Husband s case, supra. And exemplified in Dixon s case and the appeal must be dismissed for the reasons given, both in respect of the matter of principle raised and on the issue of whether the sentence imposed was excessive. [17] In Schultz v Ministry of Transport, Thomas J affirmed the result in Eskdale. 9 The offences under consideration in Schultz were the appellant failing to give his name and address to a Police officer, and failing to accompany him to the Police At 319. Eskdale v Ministry of Transport HC Hamilton AP14.88, 1 March At 5. Schultz v Ministry of Transport HC Auckland AP261/90, 19 December 1990.
6 station for an evidential breath or blood test. The relevant parts of the judgment are as follows: 10 Mr Singh s key submission was that, as he was not driving, Mr Schultz did not represent a danger to the public and should not have been disqualified. He contended that the sentence was harsh and excessive because once it is accepted that Mr Schultz had not driven the car, then ipso facto he was not a danger on the road. As a matter of discretion, Mr Singh explained, the Court cannot disqualify a person if a road safety offence is not involved. I must reject this submission. No specific penalties are provided in respect of an offence under s 58B(1). Section 30 relating to general penalties therefore applies. It provides that every person who commits an offence for which no penalty is provided elsewhere in the Act or any regulations made under the Act is liable to a fine not exceeding $500.00, and if in the opinion of the Court the offence relates to road safety, the Court may order the person to be disqualified from holding or obtaining a drivers licence for such period as the Court thinks fit. (Emphasis added.) It can be seen at once that before the Court may exercise its discretion to order that a person be disqualified from holding or obtaining a licence it must be of the opinion that the offence relates to road safety. I do not accept that these words are to be given a restricted meaning, and this view is reinforced by reference to the Court of Appeal's decision in Husband v Napier City Council [1979] 1 NZLR 317. In that case it was held that the requirement that the offender accompany a Traffic Officer to a Police Station for the purpose of supplying a specimen of blood is part of a process for protecting road users from drivers who might turn out to be incapable of driving through being under the influence of alcohol. The offender s refusal to accompany the Traffic Officer when required to do so was therefore an offence relating to road safety. The decision has been followed by Doogue J in Eskdale v MOT (AP14/88, Hamilton Registry; [1988] VCL 542). To my mind this principle makes good sense, particularly in the context of a charge of failing to accompany a Traffic officer for any of the purposes in s 58B(1) of the Transport Act. An enforcement officer is empowered to require a person to accompany him in order to undergo an evidential breath test or blood test or both. This is necessary to render the breath and blood alcohol provisions effective. The same penalties apply in respect of a breach of that section as apply to an offence of driving with an excess alcohol level in the breath or blood. The reasoning is readily apparent. Clearly, the Legislature could see no good reason why someone who avoids a blood test or who refuses to undergo a breath screening test, having been lawfully required to do so, should receive a lesser penalty than that which would be appropriate if the offender had in fact accompanied the enforcement officer and the tests had been carried out. In such circumstances, therefore, it is not inappropriate to have regard to the range of penalties which apply where an offender acts in breach of s 58B(1). Otherwise, of course, the offender will obtain an advantage by refusing to do what the Act requires, and the purpose of the Act will be thwarted. 10 At 2-4.
7 [18] While I accept the type of offence that Mr Garnham was suspected to have committed might only relate to road safety in an indirect way, I still think it relates to road safety. I would adopt the reasoning of Doogue J in Eskdale and Thomas J in Schultz. [19] I am reassured that my conclusion on this issue is correct by the judgment of Cooke J (as he then was) in Police v Dixon, 11 where his Honour held that the discretion to impose disqualification for a road safety offence in the predecessor section to s 80 of the Act could be exercised in the case of a person convicted of being in charge of a vehicle and failing to provide all information leading to the identification of a driver. In the case the appellant was the passenger in a car which had been involved in a crash. The driver went to hospital with injuries. When the police arrived on the crash scene the appellant told police he had been the driver. He subsequently admitted that he had given misleading information. Cooke J concluded that the offence was encompassed within the concept of a road safety issue. His Honour said: 12 In considering whether the facts of the present offence relate it to road safety no help can be obtained from the decision under appeal. The Magistrate s attention was evidently not drawn to this requirement. An attempt to defraud an insurance company, on which he based his order of disqualification, has no nexus with road safety. In the circumstances this Court has to look at the facts afresh. It was pointed out that the car was wrecked and out of action and that there was no material before the Court on which it would be right to infer that consumption of alcohol by the driver was involved. On this footing it was argued that the offence did not relate to actual driving. But that is not the criterion. The constable knew that an accident had happened in which people were injured and a car damaged; there was a suggestion that the cause was excessive speed. These circumstances are enough, in my opinion on the facts of this case, to relate to road safety his direction to disclose the identity of the driver, and consequently to relate to road safety the defendant s failure to comply with that direction. The giving of untrue information was not compliance Police v Dixon [1973] 2 NZLR 225 (SC). At 229.
8 Was the fine excessive? [20] I am not persuaded the fine was clearly excessive. The maximum penalty for offending under s 52(6) is $20,000. The fine here was only $600. The car involved has not yet been found by police. In these circumstances I would not disturb the fine. Appeal against conviction [21] The aspect of this case which causes me concern is that the police appear to have failed to have informed the Justices of the Peace of the fact that Mr Garnham did make available to the police a list of telephone numbers. It is possible that information was the only information in Mr Garnham s possession or which was obtainable by him which could have led to the identification of the driver of the vehicle. [22] I am also concerned that the Court record plainly suggests that on 20 June 2012 some arrangement appears to have been made which could have resulted in the information being withdrawn if Mr Garnham provided the police with information about the driver of the vehicle. [23] In her written submissions, Ms Light endeavoured to suggest that the officer in charge denies making any representations about withdrawing the charges in exchange for information about the identity of the driver. The police officer s explanation to Ms Light is not consistent with the court record and in any event is a hearsay statement which has not been tendered as evidence or tested. I cannot place any weight on what the police officer has told Ms Light about this issue. [24] I am concerned that the Justices of the Peace should have been provided with an opportunity to determine if in fact Mr Garnham had adhered to what appears to have been a fair arrangement made with the police when his case was called in the Porirua District Court on 20 June 2012.
9 [25] In my assessment, whilst ultimately the merits of Mr Garnham s case may be weak, I believe that it is more important that the integrity of the prosecution system not be impugned. If an error in the prosecution system has deprived the Justices of the Peace from considering fully the merits of the case against Mr Garnham then it behoves this Court to ensure that any miscarriage of justice is not perpetuated. Conclusion [26] I will allow the appeal, quash Mr Garnham s conviction and direct that his case be reheard in the Porirua District Court. D B Collins J Solicitors: Crown Solicitor, Wellington for Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC PAUL ANDREW HAMPTON Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2014-463-000062 [2014] NZHC 2423 PAUL ANDREW HAMPTON Appellant v Hearing: 1 October 2014 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Appearances: Rebecca Plunket
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC MITCHELL DUDGEON MCLEISH Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2015-409-000048 [2015] NZHC 1610 BETWEEN AND MITCHELL DUDGEON MCLEISH Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 9 July 2015 Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC CHANTELL PENE NGATIKAI Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI 2014-004-000413 [2014] NZHC 3294 BETWEEN AND CHANTELL PENE NGATIKAI Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 16 December 2014 Appearances:
More informationJOEL DYLAN BOWLIN Applicant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Fogarty and Dobson JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
23 April 2015 at 8 am - DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA686/2014 [2015] NZCA 137 BETWEEN AND JOEL DYLAN BOWLIN Applicant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 5 March 2015 Court: Counsel: Judgment:
More informationAppellant. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA129/2016 [2016] NZCA 133 BETWEEN AND MICHAEL MARINO Appellant THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Respondent Hearing: 4 April 2016 Court: Counsel:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC BENJAMIN DUNCAN ROSS Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2014-485-63 [2014] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND BENJAMIN DUNCAN ROSS Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 23 September 2014 Appearances: C
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC 2357 THE QUEEN FABIAN JESSIE MIKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-009-001924 [2013] NZHC 2357 THE QUEEN v Hearing: 10 September 2013 FABIAN JESSIE MIKA Appearances: P J Shamy and MAJ Elliott for Crown J
More informationIndex. Abbreviations/meanings
Road Trip - an abbreviated guide to Road Transport Legislation in New South Wales Author: Darren Robinson Lawyer, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) Version 13.1 [July 2013] Index 2-7
More informationKARL MURRAY BROWN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Ellen France, MacKenzie and Mallon JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA686/2013 [2014] NZCA 93 BETWEEN AND KARL MURRAY BROWN Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 18 February 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Ellen France, MacKenzie
More informationDAVID KEITH SILBY Applicant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. A J Ewing for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA428/2016 [2016] NZCA 592 BETWEEN AND DAVID KEITH SILBY Applicant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 18 October 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Cooper, Brewer
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAURANGA REGISTRY CRI-2013-470-7 [2013] NZHC 1350 BETWEEN AND CHERYL MCVEIGH Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 30 May 2013 Appearances: TA Castle for Appellant
More information2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, Bill 158
2ND SESSION, 41ST LEGISLATURE, ONTARIO 66 ELIZABETH II, 2017 Bill 158 An Act to amend the Highway Traffic Act in respect of harm to vulnerable road users Ms C. DiNovo Private Member s Bill 1st Reading
More informationFamily Dispute Resolution Act 2013
Family Dispute Resolution Act 2013 Public Act 2013 No 79 Date of assent 24 September 2013 Commencement see section 2 Contents Page 1 Title 2 2 Commencement 2 Preliminary provisions 3 Purposes 2 4 Interpretation
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC 3274 TELEISHA MCLAREN. S N McKenzie for Crown
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CRI-2014-425-000043 [2014] NZHC 3274 TELEISHA MCLAREN v Hearing: 15 December 2014 R Appearances: H T Young for Appellant S N McKenzie for Crown Judgment:
More informationSHANE ALAN ROHDE Respondent
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 001/16 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO. 5 Applicant AND SHANE
More informationholder of a probationary driving licence is convicted under this
(2) The court shall order particulars of any conviction under this section to be endorsed on any driving licence held by the person convicted. (4) A person convicted under this section shall be disqualified
More informationLCDT 015/10. of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1. Applicant. BRETT DEAN RAVELICH, of Auckland, Barrister
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZLCDT 11 LCDT 015/10 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND BRETT
More informationAN BILLE UM THRÁCHT AR BHÓITHRE 2009 ROAD TRAFFIC BILL Mar a ritheadh ag dhá Theach an Oireachtais As passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas
AN BILLE UM THRÁCHT AR BHÓITHRE 2009 ROAD TRAFFIC BILL 2009 Mar a ritheadh ag dhá Theach an Oireachtais As passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General
More informationRoad Transport (General) Regulation 2005
New South Wales Road Transport (General) Regulation 2005 under the Road Transport (General) Act 2005 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation
More informationRoad Traffic Offenders (Surrender of Driving Licences Etc) Bill
Road Traffic Offenders (Surrender of Driving Licences Etc) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Transport with the consent of Michael Tomlinson, the Member
More informationRoad Transport (General) Amendment (Vehicle Sanctions) Act 2012 No 23
New South Wales Road Transport (General) Amendment (Vehicle Sanctions) Act 2012 No 23 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendments to Road Transport (General) Act 2005 No 11 relating
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT. (Given by Miller J)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA790/2013 [2014] NZCA 106 BETWEEN AND UGESH DUTT Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 4 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC Appellant. DENNIS MAX HAUNUI Respondent.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2015-409-63 [2015] NZHC 2456 BETWEEN AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE Appellant DENNIS MAX HAUNUI Respondent CRI-2015-485-52 BETWEEN AND PATRICK MILLER
More informationMARINE (BOATING SAFETY ALCOHOL AND DRUGS) ACT 1991 No. 80
MARINE (BOATING SAFETY ALCOHOL AND DRUGS) ACT 1991 No. 80 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Definitions 4. Application of Act 5. Prescribed concentrations of alcohol
More informationThe Road Safety (Amendment) Law of 2000 is published in the Cyprus Government Gazette according to Section 52 of the Constitution.
Ε.Ε. App. I(I) No. 3394, 17.3.2000 L. 33(I)/2000 The Road Safety (Amendment) Law of 2000 is published in the Cyprus Government Gazette according to Section 52 of the Constitution. Number 33(1) of 2000
More informationSentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes
Examinable excerpts of Sentencing Act 1991 as at 10 April 2018 1 Purposes PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purposes of this Act are (a) to promote consistency of approach in the sentencing of offenders; (b) to have
More informationCrimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92
New South Wales Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92 Summary of contents Part 1 Preliminary Part 2 Penalties that may be imposed Division 1 General Division 2 Alternatives to full-time detention
More informationTITLE 6A LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS CRIMINAL TRAFFIC CODE
TITLE 6A LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS CRIMINAL TRAFFIC CODE Enacted: Resolution S-13 (10/7/74) Resolution 88-66 (8/9/88) (Title 6A) Amended: Resolution U-75 (12/6/76) Resolution 77-25 (3/8/77) Resolution
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF FRANZ FISCHER v. AUSTRIA. (Application no.
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF FRANZ FISCHER v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 37950/97) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG
More informationNumber 23 of 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. 2. Regulations to give effect to acts of European Communities.
Section 1. Definitions. Number 23 of 2006 ROAD TRAFFIC ACT 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 2. Regulations to give effect to acts of European Communities. 3. Prohibition on holding mobile phone by driver of
More informationQueensland DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (FAMILY PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT 1992
Queensland DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (FAMILY PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT 1992 Act No. 46 of 1992 Queensland DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (FAMILY PROTECTION) AMENDMENT ACT 1992 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS Page 1 Short title.....................................................
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent JUDGMENT OF CLIFFORD J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2015-485-17 [2015] NZHC 2235 BETWEEN AND DINH TU DO Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 23 June 2015 Counsel: A Shaw for Appellant
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM. provide for a reduction in the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) level for drivers;
AN BILLE UM THRÁCHT AR BHÓITHRE 2009 ROAD TRAFFIC BILL 2009 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM Purpose of the Bill The purpose of the Bill is to: provide for a reduction in the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) level for
More informationRoad Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 1998 No 99
New South Wales Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 1998 No 99 Contents Page Part 1 Preliminary 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Objects of Act 2 4 Definitions 3 5 Application of Commonwealth Acts
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) High Court Ref. No: 16424 Magistrate s Court Case No: 205/16 Magistrate s Court Ref. No.: 26/2016 In the matter between: THE STATE
More informationCriminal Law: Implications after road death or injury
InformatIon Handbook 1 Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury Produced in partnership with www.emsleys.co.uk Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury CONTENTS: Introduction..............................................................3
More informationWelfare of Animals Act (Northern Ireland) 2011
Welfare of Animals Act (Northern Ireland) 2011 2011 CHAPTER 16 An Act to make provision about animal welfare. [29th March 2011] BE IT ENACTED by being passed by the Northern Ireland Assembly and assented
More informationAllegation and Findings of Fact That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 06/11/2017 07/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Erik MILNER GMC reference number: 3317501 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 1989 University
More informationVEHICLE SEIZURE AND REMOVAL REGULATION
Province of Alberta TRAFFIC SAFETY ACT VEHICLE SEIZURE AND REMOVAL REGULATION Alberta Regulation 251/2006 With amendments up to and including Alberta Regulation 29/2018 Office Consolidation Published by
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Roser [2004] QCA 318 PARTIES: R v ROSER, Matthew Scott (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 265 of 2004 DC No 1432 of 2004 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: DELIVERED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC 81. Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent (ORAL) JUDGMENT OF FAIRE J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2014-463-95 [2015] NZHC 81 BETWEEN AND PETER BILL GRAY Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 4 February 2015 Counsel: M McGhie for appellant
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI [2017] NZDC THE QUEEN TULUA DANIEL TANOAI (AKA) ARETA MARK TANOAI
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI-2017-004-004019 [2017] NZDC 20334 THE QUEEN v TULUA DANIEL TANOAI (AKA) ARETA MARK TANOAI Hearing: 8 September 2017 Appearances: A Linterman for the Crown M Pecotic
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2016-485-60 [2016] NZHC 2359 BETWEEN AND MATTHEW BROWN Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 3 October 2016 Appearances: Appellant in
More informationWritten traffic warnings
Written traffic warnings Detailed table of contents This chapter contains the following topics: Summary Introduction Hierarchy of traffic enforcement interventions Guidance on traffic warnings Verbal warnings
More informationAppellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA831/2013 [2014] NZCA 119 BETWEEN AND THE QUEEN Appellant JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent Hearing: 12 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Wild, Goddard and Clifford
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE CRI [2018] NZHC 770. Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGANUI REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE CRI-2018-483-1 [2018] NZHC 770 BETWEEN AND RUBEN HAWEA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 17 April 2018
More informationJury Amendment Act 2010 No 55
New South Wales Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Jury Act 1977 No 18 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of Jury Regulation 2004 22 New South Wales Act No 55, 2010 An Act to amend
More informationPenalties and Sentences Act 1985
Penalties and Sentences Act 1985 No. 10260 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section 1. Purposes. 2. Commencement. 3. Definitions. PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 GENERAL SENTENCING PROVISIONS 4. Court may take guilty plea
More informationUNTAET REGULATION NO 2001/8 ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGIME GOVERNING ROAD TRAFFIC IN EAST TIMOR
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor UNTAET NATIONS UNIES Administration Transitoire des Nations Unies au Timor Oriental UNTAET/REG/2001/8 26 June 2001 REGULATION NO
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationMOTOR VEHICLES INSURANCE ACTS AMENDMENT ACT of 1945, 9 Geo. 6 No. 27
125 TRAFFIC PRELIMINARY NOTE Motor Vehicle Driving Instruction School Act 1969 135 Motor Vehicles Insurance Act 1936-1969.. 135 Tolls on Privately Constructed Road Traffic Facilities Act of 1931 135 Traffic
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV-2016-409-000046 [2016] NZHC 1297 BETWEEN AND SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 14 June 2016 Appearances: D J
More informationTHE ROAD TRANSPORT ACT 2013; NAVIGATING THE NEW REGIME
THE ROAD TRANSPORT ACT 2013; NAVIGATING THE NEW REGIME LEGAL AID COMMISSION CRIMINAL LAW CONFERENCE 2013 1 ST AUGUST 2013 BRETT THOMAS WILLIS AND BOWRING bthomas@willisbowring.com.au 1 INTRODUCTION; In
More informationRICHARD LYALL GENGE Applicant. VISITING JUSTICE CHRISTCHURCH MENʼS PRISON First Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE CIV-2018-409-000212 [2018] NZHC 1457 BETWEEN AND AND AND RICHARD LYALL GENGE Applicant VISITING JUSTICE CHRISTCHURCH
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Kelly [2018] QCA 307 PARTIES: R v KELLY, Mark John (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 297 of 2017 DC No 1924 of 2017 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court of
More informationThat being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 09/11/2017 10/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Andrew MACKENZIE GMC reference number: 6134691 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 2006
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11442-2015 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and OLUFEMI AKINWOLE OLUJINMI Respondent Before: Mrs J.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI CRI [2015] NZHC 1127 TAFFY TE WHIWHI MIHINUI TRACY-LEE ENOKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2015-463-000028 CRI-2015-463-000027 [2015] NZHC 1127 TAFFY TE WHIWHI MIHINUI TRACY-LEE ENOKA v NEW ZEALAND POLICE Hearing: 18 May 2015 Appearances:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 20 October 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant: NMC
More informationBetween Her Majesty the Queen, and Brandon Oliver. [2011] O.J. No Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario. W.J. Blacklock J.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Oliver Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Brandon Oliver [2011] O.J. No. 4554 Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario W.J. Blacklock J. Oral judgment: June 20, 2011. (32 paras.)
More informationDECISION IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2014] NZIACDT 102 Reference No: IACDT 11/12 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationTitle 5 Traffic Code Chapter 2 Criminal Traffic Code
Title 5 Traffic Code Chapter 2 Criminal Traffic Code Sec. 5-01.010 Title 5-02.020 Authority 5-02.030 Definitions 5-02.040 Applicability of Criminal Procedures Subchapter I - Traffic Offenses 5-02.050 Failure
More informationEnhancing Identity Verification and Border Processes Legislation Bill (PCO 19557/14.0) Our Ref: ATT395/252
2 10 June 2016 Attorney-General Enhancing Identity Verification and Border Processes Legislation Bill (PCO 19557/14.0) Our Ref: ATT395/252 1. We have reviewed this Bill for consistency with the New Zealand
More informationBEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 47. Reference No: IACDT 034/14
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 47 Reference No: IACDT 034/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationBlackstone s Police Manuals
Blackstone s Police Manuals Update January 2006 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 PACE Codes of Practice Fraser Sampson David Johnston & Glenn Hutton [Updated to reflect the Centrex OSPRE Part
More informationTHE QUEEN. D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner SENTENCE OF RANDERSON J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY T.013648 THE QUEEN V BOWEN PUTOA NEHA MANIHERA Date: 3 February 2003 Counsel: Sentence: D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner Four years imprisonment
More informationNOTICE OF DECISION. AND TO: Chief Constable Police Department. AND TO: Inspector Police Department. AND TO: Sergeant Police Department AND TO:
IN THE MATTER OF THE POLICE ACT, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 367 AND IN THE MATTER OF A REVIEW OF ALLEGATIONS OF DECEIT AND DISCREDITABLE CONDUCT AGAINST CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DECISION TO:
More informationBail (Drug and Alcohol Testing) Amendment Act 2016
Bail (Drug and Alcohol Testing) Amendment Act 2016 Public Act 2016 No 83 Date of assent 15 November 2016 Commencement see section 2 Contents Page 1 Title 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Principal Act 2 Definitions
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The application for an extension of time to appeal is granted.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA364/2015 [2016] NZCA 469 BETWEEN AND DEAN JOHN DREVER Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 22 September 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Brown and Brewer
More informationRoad Traffic Amendment (Impounding and Confiscation of Vehicles) Act 2004
Western Australia Road Traffic Amendment (Impounding and Confiscation of Vehicles) Act 2004 (No. 10 of 2004) CONTENTS 1. Short title 1 2. Commencement 2 3. The Act amended 2 4. Section 5 amended 2 5. Section
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MTHETHO JOSEPH KHUMALO
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In matter between: THE STATE VS Review No: 138/2011 MTHETHO JOSEPH KHUMALO Accused CORAM: KRUGER et C.J. MUSI, JJ JUDGMENT BY: C.J. MUSI, J
More informationEFFECTIVE DATE: May 20, 2011
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 57200-00 SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: May 20, 2011 POLICY CODE: IMP 1 CROSS-REFERENCE: Impaired Driving
More informationROAD SAFETY ACT 2006: IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTIONS 20 & 21
Circular No. 2008/03 TITLE ROAD SAFETY ACT 2006: IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTIONS 20 & 21 Issue date 18 August 2008 For more information Contact Robin Edwards or Yvonne Murray Telephone 020 7035 6959 or 020
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC 923. LEE RUTH ANDERSON Applicant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2015-404-000039 [2015] NZHC 923 BETWEEN AND LEE RUTH ANDERSON Applicant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 28 April 2015 Appearances: D Schellenberg
More informationAnimal Welfare Act 2006
Animal Welfare Act 2006 CHAPTER 45 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately 9 00 Animal Welfare Act 2006 CHAPTER 45 CONTENTS Introductory
More informationSecurity and Investigation Agents Act 1995
Version: 28.4.2008 South Australia Security and Investigation Agents Act 1995 An Act to regulate security and investigation agents; to repeal the Commercial and Private Agents Act 1986; and for other purposes.
More informationROAD SAFETY ACT 2006
ROAD SAFETY ACT 2006 EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Road Safety Act 2006 (c.49) which received Royal Assent on 8 th November 2006. They have been prepared by the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 254 THE QUEEN STEAD NUKU NIGEL JOHN LAKE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2015-044-002617 [2016] NZHC 254 THE QUEEN v STEAD NUKU NIGEL JOHN LAKE Hearing: 24 February 2016 Appearances: S McColgan for the Crown R M Mansfield
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CRI [2017] NZHC 2279 THE QUEEN PATRICK DIXON
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CRI-2016-092-012355 [2017] NZHC 2279 THE QUEEN v PATRICK DIXON Hearing: 20 September 2017 Counsel: L P
More informationPolice v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES NYPRAKASH NUNKOO
Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo 2016 PMP 310 Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 1666/13 POLICE V NYPRAKASH NUNKOO JUDGMENT Accused stands charged of having on the 9 th of
More informationBEFORE THE APPEALS COUNCIL OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
BEFORE THE APPEALS COUNCIL OF THE NEW ZEALAND INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MATTER OF a n appeal against a determination of the Disciplinary Tribunal of the New Zealand Institute of Chartered
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Williams, Venning and Mander JJ. A G V Rogers, M H McIvor and J Kim for Appellant M H Cooke for Respondent
ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PURSUANT TO S 200 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR
More informationApplication for an Authority to Drive Taxi-Cab or Private Hire Vehicle (Issued under the Passenger Transport Act 1990)
Application for an Authority to Drive Taxi-Cab or Private Hire Vehicle (Issued under the Passenger Transport Act 1990) NSW Transport and Infrastructure collects and holds your personal information for
More information2013 Bill 32. First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 32 ENHANCING SAFETY ON ALBERTA ROADS ACT
2013 Bill 32 First Session, 28th Legislature, 62 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 32 ENHANCING SAFETY ON ALBERTA ROADS ACT THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION First Reading.......................................................
More informationMijin Kim THE NAME AND ANY INFORMATION IDENTIFYING THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISION
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 73 Reference No: IACDT 014/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC 1018 THE QUEEN REBEL WAITOHI. K A Stoikoff for Prisoner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2013-044-1109 [2014] NZHC 1018 THE QUEEN v Hearing: 15 May 2014 REBEL WAITOHI Appearances: T M Cooper for Crown K A Stoikoff for Prisoner Sentence:
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013 Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Hilton Belfast, 4 Lanyon Place, Belfast BT1 3LP Name of Registrant
More informationPARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA MOTOR TRAFFIC (AMENDMENT) ACT, No. 18 OF 2017 [Certified on 03rd of October, 2017] Printed on the Order of Government Published as a Supplement
More informationI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA116/2017 [2018] NZCA 477. CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HALPIN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY SS 203 AND 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE
More informationVOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY
VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 In December 2014, the States approved the introduction of a mandatory Register of Driving Instructors, and the introduction
More information1990 CHAPTER S HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan, enacts as follows:
1990 CHAPTER S-63.1 An Act respecting Summary Offences Procedure and Certain consequential amendments resulting from the enactment of this Act (Assented to June 22, 1990) HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Goddard and Andrews JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA761/2013 [2014] NZCA 375 BETWEEN AND BENJAMIN VAINU Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 29 July 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Goddard and Andrews
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2014] NZHC 2483 BETWEEN. Plaintiff
NOTE: PURSUANT TO S 437A OF THE CHILDREN, YOUNG PERSONS, AND THEIR FAMILIES ACT 1989, ANY REPORT OF THIS PROCEEDING MUST COMPLY WITH SS 11B TO 11D OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT 1980. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC Plaintiff. AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2015-404-002795 [2016] NZHC 1199 BETWEEN AND ALWYNE JONES Plaintiff AUCKLAND COUNCIL Defendant Hearing: 29 February 2016 Appearances: R Pidgeon for
More informationTHIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 4860/02 by Julija LEPARSKIENĖ against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 November 2007 as a Chamber
More informationAN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY
AN ACT RELATING TO DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING THE PENALTY FOR HOMICIDE BY VEHICLE WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR OR DRUGS; INCREASING PENALTIES
More informationReasonable Cause CPD Conference. 24 March Motor Traffic Law: Legislation and case law update
Reasonable Cause CPD Conference 24 March 2018 Motor Traffic Law: Legislation and case law update Presented by Nic Angelov Barrister Ada Evans Chambers Overview ROAD TRANSPORT AMENDMENT (DRIVER LICENCE
More informationDriving Under the Influence; House Sub. for SB 374
Driving Under the Influence; House Sub. for SB 374 House Sub. for SB 374 amends law concerning driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both (DUI). Specifically, the bill amends statutes governing
More informationTHERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS.
THERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS. PLEASE SEE ORDER 5 ON PAGE 10 FOR FULL SUPPRESSION DETAILS. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS
More informationNEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 15 LCDT 09/09. IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No. [2009] NZLCDT 15 LCDT 09/09 IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN AUCKLAND DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND EMMA
More information