IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant
|
|
- Ralph Green
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC 1297 BETWEEN AND SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 14 June 2016 Appearances: D J Matthews for Appellant AMS Williams for Respondent Judgment: 15 June 2016 JUDGMENT OF GENDALL J Introduction [1] The appellant, Shaun Bolton, pleaded guilty in the District Court to two charges of male assaults female 1 and one charge of wilful damage. 2 On 11 May 2016 Judge Mabey sentenced Mr Bolton to 26 months imprisonment. The appellant now appeals on the basis that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. Background Factual circumstances [2] On Saturday 13 February 2016 Mr Bolton, in an intoxicated state, arrived at the home of his partner, the victim. Also present at the address was the partner s sister and her partner. The victim was sitting on the front doorstep when Mr Bolton became verbally aggressive towards her. Things escalated and Mr Bolton picked her up by the hair and clothes and threw her into a brick wall. The victim walked inside 1 2 Crimes Act 1961, s 194(b). Summary Offences Act 1981, s 11(1)(a). BOLTON v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2016] NZHC 1297 [15 June 2016]
2 and tried to shut the front door but the appellant forced the door open, grabbed her by the throat and held her against the wall momentarily. The victim broke free and went to the lounge in order to get away. The appellant followed her, picked her up and threw her down on the couch. He then held her down and punched her twice in the face with a closed fist. The victim suffered a cut to the head. [3] Some weeks later, on Saturday 2 April 2016 Mr Bolton was again at the home of the victim, now his ex-partner, in an intoxicated state. He again began verbally abusing the victim. Over a two hour period things escalated to the point where Mr Bolton picked up the victim s microwave and threw it across the kitchen breaking it. The victim attempted to escape into the longue, hiding behind her friend who was present. However, Mr Bolton pushed the friend aside and kicked the victim four times on the left side of her body as she crouched down to protect herself. Mr Bolton walked out of the longue kicking a glass tank in the kitchen, smashing it. Judge Mabey s sentencing [4] Judge Mabey noted the appellant s serious list of previous convictions involving relevant violent offences, some against females and some in a domestic scenario. It was accepted by everyone involved that the only available sentence here was one of imprisonment. [5] On the first charge of male assaults female, Judge Mabey took a starting point of 15 months imprisonment, taking account of the level of violence, and the victim s vulnerability. The Judge increased that by three months to reflect the previous similar offending. The Judge then gave a four month discount for the guilty plea reducing the sentence to one of 14 months. [6] On the second charge, Judge Mabey took a starting point of 18 months given that the offending was shortly after the first lot of offending and was against the same woman. This was increased to 20 months given the offending was while the appellant was on bail. A full guilty plea credit reduced this to 15 months imprisonment.
3 [7] In considering whether to impose the sentences cumulatively or concurrently, the Judge considered the offending was separate in time and quite distinct even though it was against the same person. For that reason His Honour decided that a cumulative sentence was the most appropriate. In order to not offend the totality principle the sentence was reduced from 29 to 26 months imprisonment. A one month concurrent sentence was entered on the wilful damage charge. Submissions Submissions for the appellant [8] Counsel for the appellant submits that the end sentence was manifestly excessive. Counsel says that: (a) a global starting point in the region of up to 20 months imprisonment was appropriate for the totality of the offending here; (b) an overall uplift of up to six months to reflect the appellant s previous history and the fact that he reoffended on bail against the same victim could be justified; and (c) after 25 per cent credit is allowed for the appellant s guilty pleas, an end sentence in the region of 20 months imprisonment was the appropriate outcome. Submissions for the respondent [9] In response, the respondent contends that the end sentence of 26 months imprisonment was available to Judge Mabey and cannot be described as manifestly excessive. The fact that the victim did not sustain serious or permanent injuries is reflected in the level of the charge. [10] It is also submitted that the seriousness of the offending is further aggravated by the close temporal proximity of the two incidents and the fact that the appellant was on bail at the time of the second offence for the earlier offending.
4 Jurisdiction [11] The appellant may appeal the imposed sentence as of right. 3 As the first appeal Court, 4 this Court must only allow the appeal if satisfied that: 5 (a) For any reason, there is an error in the sentence imposed on conviction; and (b) A different sentence should be imposed. [12] In the recent judgement of Tutakangahau v R, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 sentence appeal regime was not intended to signify a departure from the position under the previous Crimes Act 1961, s 385(3), and the Summary Proceedings Act 1957, s 121(3), regimes. 6 In specifically considering the pre-criminal Procedure Act concept of manifestly excessive, the Court of Appeal stated: [33] Plainly, s 250(2) makes no express reference to a manifestly excessive sentence. However, this concept has been part and parcel of the approach to sentencing appeals for a considerable time and we can discern no intention to change the approach [13] The appeal proceeds on this basis. Discussion [14] There is no submission advanced here for Mr Bolton that Judge Mabey was not entitled to sentence on a cumulative basis. Section 84 of the Sentencing Act 2002 provides that concurrent sentences are generally appropriate if the offences for which an offender is being sentenced are of a similar kind and are a connected series of offences. 7 That is not the case here. Although the offences are similar in kind, and the victim was in fact the same person on both occasions, the incidents took place some weeks apart so it could not be said they were a connected series of offences. However, given that cumulative sentences of imprisonment were being Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 244. Section 247. Section 250. Tutakangahau v R [2014] NZCA 297, [2014] 3 NZLR 482. Section 84(2).
5 imposed, an adjustment for totality was likely to be necessary. 8 reduce the sentence by three months to account for this totality. Judge Mabey did [15] In R v Reihana it was noted that there is no tariff for the offence of male assaults female. The circumstances of its commission and offenders can vary greatly. 9 [16] In Wallace v R the offender pleaded guilty to two counts of male assaults female, two counts of common assault and one count of intentional damage. 10 The victim was attacked by the offender a number of times using both fists about the upper and lower legs. As she tried to protect herself the offender punched her in her arms, stomach and back. The victim ended up on the floor in the foetal position where she lay crying. The victim suffered severe bruising covering her legs, back, stomach, arms and shoulder. [17] The following day the victim was again at the house. The offender entered the room racially abusing her. When the victim tried to escape the appellant chased her, throwing her into another room where he pushed her into an upstanding heater causing it to fall over and the victim on top of it. After running to the door she was pushed to the ground. This gave rise to a charge of common assault. On that same day the offender threw the victim s friend out the door when she tried to help the victim. She suffered a bruised arm and a sore head from her hair being pulled. This gave rise to a further charge. [18] One week later the first victim was at her home with the offender. They argued and she left the address. The offender approached her from behind grabbing her leg. He then punched her once to the right side of her head. This resulted in a further charge of male assaults female. [19] The Court of Appeal held that the starting point of 15 months imprisonment for all of the offending was within the available range, stating: Sentencing Act 2002, s 85. R v Reihana CA , 3 July Wallace v R [2012] NZCA 546. At [14].
6 The first assault on Ms K was quite serious. Although it did not involve any attack to the head it was sustained. The final attack in which Ms K was punched in the head, while not as serious, was such as to require an uplift. Further, the seriousness of the offending was aggravated by the gratuitous assault on Ms J. [20] However, the Court did consider the final sentence to be stern. 12 [21] In Soper v Police the offender appealed his sentence of 21 months imprisonment for one charge of common assault and one charge of male assaults female, both committed against his former partner. The victim was recovering from injuries she received as a result of a car accident. She was on crutches and had a metal plate installed to remedy a broken eye socket. [22] The first assault occurred after the victim and the offender had been drinking heavily. The offender became angry, straddled the victim and pushed down hard on her chest causing her pain. He also clenched his fist and threatened to punch the victim. Two days later the victim arrived home to find the offender intoxicated. She threatened to call the police and he became angry, again straddling her and punching her in the face three times. This resulted in the male assaults female charge. [23] On appeal Dunningham J considered that a sentence of 12 months imprisonment was an appropriate starting point for sentencing on a charge of male assaults female alone. However, to reflect the totality of the overall offending, Her Honour considered a 15 month starting point to be appropriate in that case. [24] The appellant in Nixon v R was convicted of one charge of male assaults female and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment. 13 The offending was described as follows: [4] The Crown case was that early in the morning of 17 August 2000 Mr Nixon was at his flat A female flatmate, H, arrived at the flat. An argument developed between these two persons regarding the tidiness of the house. Mr Nixon told H to leave. She refused to do so. She said it was her house also. Mr Nixon then grabbed H by her top and pushed her out of the door, thereby causing her to fall onto a concrete area outside; and Mr Nixon then approached her, and kicked her three times in the back across the tailbone. This caused some bruising to the back of her thigh and her right hip At [23]. Nixon v R CA87/01, 19 June 2001.
7 area Undoubtedly H was bruised, and she had to have an x-ray. She was provided with crutches for six days. After the alleged assault, H left the address. She kicked the side of Mr Nixon s car as she did so. [25] The sentence was described by the Court of Appeal in that case as firm but it was upheld. 14 [26] In the Court of Appeal decision in Luff-Pycroft v R 15 three discrete instances of offending against the same victim occurred over a period of three months. The first incident involved the offender choking the victim, leaving marks on her neck, then fetching a knife and threatening to kill her. The second incident involved the appellant pushing the victim to the ground, kicking her about the body and then producing a knife and threatening to kill her, and the final incident involved the offender strangling the victim, biting her in the face and other areas multiple times and then placing his hand over her mouth with such force that it broke the enamel on three of her front teeth. [27] The charges in this case were more serious, two of assault with intent to injure and one injuring with intent to injure. A starting point in this case of two years was taken for the injuring with intent offending with a further four month uplift for the other offending and to reflect the continued nature of the offending. This resulted in an overall starting point of 28 months imprisonment. [28] Finally, in the decision in this Court Leacock-Johnson v NZ Police 16 the appellant committed two separate violent attacks on his partner, the first of which gave rise to charges of male assaults female and intentional damage, and the second gave rise to charges of male assaults female, intentional damage, breach of a protection order and refusing to permit a specimen of blood to be taken. The appellant had numerous previous convictions, including two for male assaults female, and one for assault on a child. He had been subject to a community based sentence at the time of the first offending and on bail at the time of the second At [26]. Luff-Pycroft v R [2012] NZCA 107. Leacock-Johnson v NZ Police (HC) Invercargill CRI , 12 May 2010.
8 [29] There are, in my view, a number of significant similarities between the Leacock-Johnson case and the present case. [30] In Leacock-Johnson the sentencing Judge adopted a starting point of 18 months imprisonment in respect of the first incident for which the lead offence was the charge of male assaults female. This was uplifted by three months to reflect the appellant s previous convictions and reduced by six months to reflect his guilty plea. The sentencing Judge then imposed a sentence of nine months imprisonment on the second charge of male assaults female. No starting point was identified, however, the nine months was imposed cumulatively on the 15 months sentence for the first incident. A further six months imprisonment was then imposed in respect of a separate drinking and driving charge, although this of course differs from the case before me. All of this resulted in an effective sentence of 24 months for the assault type charges. [31] On appeal to this Court His Honour Justice Miller concluded that the sentencing Judge was entitled to employ cumulative sentences despite the fact that the same victim was involved. He said that because the incidents were separate in time and the second incident occurred while the appellant was on bail concurrent sentences would not have adequately reflected the appellant s culpability. Miller J further noted that the first male assaults female charge was a nasty case of domestic violence and that the Courts could not display leniency towards such offending. Finally, he concluded that the accumulation of aggravating factors (previous assault against the same victim, other relevant previous convictions and offending against the victim whilst on bail) meant that the sentence imposed did not breach the totality principle, and he dismissed the appeal. Result [32] With all these decisions in mind, I am satisfied that the final sentence of 26 months imprisonment imposed by Judge Mabey in the present case was one available to him. The offending here clearly involved a serious combination of aggravating features. This was a case of serious domestic violence. Aggravating features included multiple incidents of violence, attacks to the head, a vulnerable
9 victim, offending in the victim s home where she was entitled to feel safe, damage to property, offending whilst on bail, and a significant history of previous violent convictions. [33] In considering the gravity of the offending the sentence in this case was one clearly available to the District Court Judge and in terms of overall totality the 26 months imprisonment imposed was appropriate here. [34] For all the reasons outlined above, this appeal is dismissed.... Gendall J Solicitors: Public Defence Service, Christchurch Raymond Donnelly & Co, Christchurch
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC 3274 TELEISHA MCLAREN. S N McKenzie for Crown
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND INVERCARGILL REGISTRY CRI-2014-425-000043 [2014] NZHC 3274 TELEISHA MCLAREN v Hearing: 15 December 2014 R Appearances: H T Young for Appellant S N McKenzie for Crown Judgment:
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE CRI [2018] NZHC 770. Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGANUI REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA WHANGANUI ROHE CRI-2018-483-1 [2018] NZHC 770 BETWEEN AND RUBEN HAWEA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 17 April 2018
More informationKARL MURRAY BROWN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Ellen France, MacKenzie and Mallon JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA686/2013 [2014] NZCA 93 BETWEEN AND KARL MURRAY BROWN Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 18 February 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Ellen France, MacKenzie
More informationTHE QUEEN TOKO MARCUS PEARSON. Guilty SENTENCE OF MACKENZIE J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2004-070-4342 THE QUEEN 0 V TOKO MARCUS PEARSON Charges: Pleas: Counsel: Sentence: I. Burglary 2. Injuring with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
More informationAppellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA831/2013 [2014] NZCA 119 BETWEEN AND THE QUEEN Appellant JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent Hearing: 12 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Wild, Goddard and Clifford
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 254 THE QUEEN STEAD NUKU NIGEL JOHN LAKE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2015-044-002617 [2016] NZHC 254 THE QUEEN v STEAD NUKU NIGEL JOHN LAKE Hearing: 24 February 2016 Appearances: S McColgan for the Crown R M Mansfield
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC MITCHELL DUDGEON MCLEISH Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2015-409-000048 [2015] NZHC 1610 BETWEEN AND MITCHELL DUDGEON MCLEISH Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 9 July 2015 Appearances:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI [2015] NZHC 81. Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent (ORAL) JUDGMENT OF FAIRE J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2014-463-95 [2015] NZHC 81 BETWEEN AND PETER BILL GRAY Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 4 February 2015 Counsel: M McGhie for appellant
More informationI TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CRI [2017] NZHC 2279 THE QUEEN PATRICK DIXON
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE CRI-2016-092-012355 [2017] NZHC 2279 THE QUEEN v PATRICK DIXON Hearing: 20 September 2017 Counsel: L P
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC 1018 THE QUEEN REBEL WAITOHI. K A Stoikoff for Prisoner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2013-044-1109 [2014] NZHC 1018 THE QUEEN v Hearing: 15 May 2014 REBEL WAITOHI Appearances: T M Cooper for Crown K A Stoikoff for Prisoner Sentence:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2013] NZHC 2357 THE QUEEN FABIAN JESSIE MIKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2013-009-001924 [2013] NZHC 2357 THE QUEEN v Hearing: 10 September 2013 FABIAN JESSIE MIKA Appearances: P J Shamy and MAJ Elliott for Crown J
More informationNOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY S 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. NOTE: DISTRICT COURT ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC BENJAMIN DUNCAN ROSS Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2014-485-63 [2014] NZHC 2388 BETWEEN AND BENJAMIN DUNCAN ROSS Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 23 September 2014 Appearances: C
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT ROTORUA CRI [2017] NZDC 3345
EDITORIAL NOTE: NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT ROTORUA CRI-2016-063-001647 [2017] NZDC 3345 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor v MANU HENARE Defendant Hearing:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC CHANTELL PENE NGATIKAI Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI 2014-004-000413 [2014] NZHC 3294 BETWEEN AND CHANTELL PENE NGATIKAI Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 16 December 2014 Appearances:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Strickland [2003] QCA 184 PARTIES: R v STRICKLAND, Wayne Robert (applicant) FILE NOS: CA No 25 of 2003 DC No 279 of 2002 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC PAUL ANDREW HAMPTON Appellant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2014-463-000062 [2014] NZHC 2423 PAUL ANDREW HAMPTON Appellant v Hearing: 1 October 2014 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Appearances: Rebecca Plunket
More informationCitation: R. v. Long Date: PESCTD 87 Docket: S-1-GC-71 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: R. v. Long Date: 20011030 2001 PESCTD 87 Docket: S-1-GC-71 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN -against- JAMES
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Kolb [2007] QCA 180 PARTIES: R v KOLB, Peter Desmond (applicant/appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 29 of 2007 DC 2585 of 2006 DC 3002 of 2005 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Douglas [2004] QCA 1 PARTIES: R v DOUGLAS, Gillian Jean (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 312 of 2003 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: DELIVERED EX TEMPORE
More informationJOEL DYLAN BOWLIN Applicant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Fogarty and Dobson JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
23 April 2015 at 8 am - DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA686/2014 [2015] NZCA 137 BETWEEN AND JOEL DYLAN BOWLIN Applicant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 5 March 2015 Court: Counsel: Judgment:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v MDB [2018] QCA 283 PARTIES: R v MDB (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 35 of 2018 DC No 265 of 2018 DC No 254 of 2018 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Randerson, Heath and Asher JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT. (Given by Heath J)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA281/2013 [2013] NZCA 623 BETWEEN AND IORITANA TUAU Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 18 November 2013 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Randerson, Heath and Asher
More informationTHE QUEEN JOHN MICHAEL COCKER. Counsel: K Stone for the Crown I M Antunovic for the Accused
NOT RECOMMENDED IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CRI-2004-085-1865 WELLINGTON REGISTRY THE QUEEN JOHN MICHAEL COCKER Counsel: K Stone for the Crown I M Antunovic for the Accused Sentencing: 15 October
More informationTHE QUEEN. D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner SENTENCE OF RANDERSON J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY T.013648 THE QUEEN V BOWEN PUTOA NEHA MANIHERA Date: 3 February 2003 Counsel: Sentence: D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner Four years imprisonment
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NAPIER REGISTRY CRI THE QUEEN ROBERT JOHN BROWN SENTENCING NOTES OF ANDREWS J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND NAPIER REGISTRY CRI 2005-020-003954 THE QUEEN v ROBERT JOHN BROWN Hearing: 30 July 2008 Appearances: C R Walker for the Crown D H Quilliam for the Prisoner Judgment: 30
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED.
EDITORIAL NOTE: SOME NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT MANUKAU CRI-2016-092-011259 [2017] NZDC 10782 THE QUEEN v ISAIAH MICHAEL PEKA Hearing: 24 May 2017
More informationSummary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017
Summary of Investigation SiRT File # 2017-036 Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 John L. Scott Interim Director June 12, 2018 Background: On December 4, 2017, SiRT Interim Director, John Scott,
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. The appeal, which is against both conviction and sentence, is dismissed. REASONS OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA592/2012 [2013] NZCA 339 BETWEEN AND MARK HETERAKA Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 15 July 2013 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Wild, Heath and Keane JJ L L Heah
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Samad [2012] QCA 63 PARTIES: R v SAMAD, Mohammed Abdus (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 12 of 2012 DC No 1156 of 2011 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Mullen [2006] QCA 317 PARTIES: R V MULLEN, Todd Kenneth (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 175 of 2006 DC No 3220 of 2005 DC No 1341 of 2006 DC No 1512 of 2006 DC No
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Sambai [03] QCA 42 PARTIES: R v SAMBAI, Lucas Londe (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 352 of 02 DC No of 02 DIVISION: Court of Appeal PROCEEDING: Sentence Application
More informationI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA116/2017 [2018] NZCA 477. CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HALPIN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY SS 203 AND 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN STACEY REID BLACKMORE
Date: 19991207 Docket: AD-0832 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN: AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN STACEY REID BLACKMORE APPELLANT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PAPAKURA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor. CAMERON JASON PANTON Defendant
EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PAPAKURA CRI-2016-055-000928 [2016] NZDC 25117 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor v CAMERON JASON PANTON Defendant Hearing: 7 December 2016 Appearances:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Puchala [03] QCA 5 PARTIES: R v PUCHALA, Paul (appellant) PUCHALA, Matthew (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 332 of 03 CA No 334 of 03 DC No 352 of 03 DIVISION: Court
More informationAppellant. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA129/2016 [2016] NZCA 133 BETWEEN AND MICHAEL MARINO Appellant THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Respondent Hearing: 4 April 2016 Court: Counsel:
More informationProposal. Budget sensitive. In confidence. Office of the Minister of Justice. Chair. Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW
Budget sensitive In confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair Cabinet Social Policy Committee REFORM OF FAMILY VIOLENCE LAW Paper Three: Prosecuting family violence Proposal 1. This paper is the
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: CHANGES MADE TO THIS JUDGMENT APPEAR IN [SQUARE BRACKETS]. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT MANUKAU CRI [2017] NZDC 25779
EDITORIAL NOTE: CHANGES MADE TO THIS JUDGMENT APPEAR IN [SQUARE BRACKETS]. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT MANUKAU CRI-2015-004-017104 [2017] NZDC 25779 THE QUEEN v SHEN ZHANG ZHONG SHU HAN Hearing: 13 November
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2014] NZHC 2705 THE QUEEN SHANE PIERRE HARRISON DILLIN PAKAI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2013-096-2316 [2014] NZHC 2705 THE QUEEN v Hearing: 31 October 2014 SHANE PIERRE HARRISON DILLIN PAKAI Counsel: G J Burston and J A Eng for the
More informationCHILDRENS COURT New South Wales
CHILDRENS COURT New South Wales Citation: R v DI Hearing dates: 14 February 2012 Date of Decision: 15 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Place of Decision: Criminal Maclean Childrens Court Judgment of: Magistrate
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH CRI [2016] NZDC 4076 THE QUEEN MICHAEL STONE KIRSTY MENNER JOSHUA CLARK CHRISTOPHER MCGOVERIN
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH CRI-2015-009-002980 [2016] NZDC 4076 THE QUEEN v MICHAEL STONE KIRSTY MENNER JOSHUA CLARK CHRISTOPHER MCGOVERIN Hearing: 9 March 2016 Appearances: S Burdes for the
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI [2016] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor
EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA CRI-2015-070-003935 [2016] NZDC 15620 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor v ROYCE THOMAS MATOE Defendant Hearing: 16 August 2016 Appearances:
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI [2017] NZDC THE QUEEN JAE MOOK MOON HYUNG BOK LEE
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI-2016-004-000272 [2017] NZDC 17014 THE QUEEN v JAE MOOK MOON HYUNG BOK LEE Hearing: 2 August 2017 Appearances: F Culliney for the Crown P Hamlin for the Defendant Moon
More informationMEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH
MEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH April 28, 2016 16-09 No Charges Approved for Force Used in Arrest by Vancouver Police Victoria - The Criminal Justice Branch (CJB), Ministry of Justice, announced
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT REASONS OF THE COURT. (Given by Miller J)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA790/2013 [2014] NZCA 106 BETWEEN AND UGESH DUTT Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 4 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Miller, Ronald Young and Clifford
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI [2012] NZHC TIMOTHY KYLE GARNHAM Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY CRI-2012-485-000098 [2012] NZHC 3447 BETWEEN AND TIMOTHY KYLE GARNHAM Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 18 December 2012 Counsel: D A
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Jones [2008] QCA 181 PARTIES: R v JONES, Matthew Kenneth (applicant/appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 73 of 2008 DC No 58 of 2008 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT LA CROSSE COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT LA CROSSE COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN -vs- Plaintiff, JOSHUA R REETZ, DOB: 10/07/1988 201 Avon Street #3 La Crosse, WI 54603 Defendant, CASE NO.: 14CF422 DA Case No. 2014LC002142 Assigned DA/ADA:
More informationMEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH
MEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH December 23, 2014 14-28 No Charges Approved in Abbotsford IIO Investigation Victoria The Criminal Justice Branch, Ministry of Justice (CJB) announced today that
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) [REPORTABLE] Case No: A59/15 JUDGMENT: 22 MARCH 2016
In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) [REPORTABLE] Case No: A59/15 MOSES SILO Appellant vs THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT: 22 MARCH 2016 HENNEY J Introduction
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Condon [2010] QCA 117 PARTIES: R v CONDON, Christopher Gerard (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 253 of 2009 DC No 114 of 2009 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 28, 2018
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 28, 2018 12/26/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KENNEDY FLEMING Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 286635
More informationSENTENCE NOTE OF MR JUSTICE GOOSE 25 MAY 2018
IN THE CROWN COURT AT BIRMINGHAM R v KAYNE ROBINSON, DARIELLE WILLIAMS, DEVONTE MAY & GEARY BARNETT SENTENCE NOTE OF MR JUSTICE GOOSE 25 MAY 2018 1. Kayne Robinson and Darielle Williams, you have both
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI [2016] NZHC 2107 THE QUEEN STEVEN BETHAM LEVI HOHEPA REUBEN AKUHATUA TIHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CRI-2015-009-003010 [2016] NZHC 2107 THE QUEEN v STEVEN BETHAM LEVI HOHEPA REUBEN AKUHATUA TIHI Hearing: 2 September 2016 Counsel: D J Orchard for
More informationGARRETT TIMOTHY BIELEFELD
[02] QCA 369 COURT OF APPEAL WILLIAMS JA JERRARD JA HELMAN J CA No 59 of 02 THE QUEEN v. GARRETT TIMOTHY BIELEFELD Applicant BRISBANE..DATE 9/09/02 JUDGMENT MR N V WESTON (instructed by Legal Aid Queensland)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA135/03 THE QUEEN ROGER HOWARD MCEWEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA135/03 THE QUEEN v ROGER HOWARD MCEWEN Hearing: 19 June 2003 Coram: Glazebrook J Heath J Doogue J Appearances: D G Harvey for Appellant M F Laracy for Crown Judgment:
More informationIn the Provincial Court of British Columbia
File No: 23804-1 Registry: Nelson In the Provincial Court of British Columbia REGINA v. ALFRED IRWIN STEINER REASONS FOR SENTENCE OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE HEWSON COPY Crown Counsel: Appearing on his own
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR Citation: R. v. Martin, 2018 NLCA 12 Date: February 22, 2018 Docket: 201701H0055 BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN APPELLANT AND: SKYE MARTIN RESPONDENT
More informationATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA. Case Summary. felony; Battery, as a Class C felony; Domestic Battery, as a Class A
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationSENTENCING FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENCES AND BREACHES MAGISTRATES COURT CONFERENCE 2 JUNE
SENTENCING FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENCES AND BREACHES MAGISTRATES COURT CONFERENCE 2 JUNE 2018 1 [1] We have been asked to present a paper on sentencing for domestic violence offences and breaches. As
More informationTHE CROWN JUNIOR SAMI. NOTES OF JUDGE FWM McELREA ON SENTENCING
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND THE CROWN v JUNIOR SAMI Hearing: 14 October 2005 Appearances: S McColgan for the Crown J Edgar for the Defendant NOTES OF JUDGE FWM McELREA ON SENTENCING [1] The defendant,
More informationPolice Use of Force during Arrest
Police Use of Force during Arrest I N T R O D U C T I O N 1. On 12 May 2013 Police used force to arrest a man (Mr X) who was threatening to set himself on fire at a rural address in the North Island. As
More informationThe Queen. - v - DYLAN JACKSON. Sentencing Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Justice Picken. 10 December 2015
In the Crown Court at Nottingham The Queen - v - DYLAN JACKSON Sentencing Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Justice Picken 10 December 2015 1. After a trial lasting some eleven days or so including jury deliberations,
More informationCase Name: R. v. Khosa. Between Regina, and Harmohinder Singh Khosa. [2014] B.C.J. No BCSC CarswellBC W.C.B.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Khosa Between Regina, and Harmohinder Singh Khosa [2014] B.C.J. No. 215 2014 BCSC 194 2014 CarswellBC 305 111 W.C.B. (2d) 876 Docket: 59889-2 Registry: Chilliwack British Columbia
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION III STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED100873 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. ) ) Honorable Elizabeth Byrne
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 12, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Don C.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 9-733 / 08-1041 Filed November 12, 2009 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MARK ALAN HEMINGWAY, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Goddard and Andrews JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA761/2013 [2014] NZCA 375 BETWEEN AND BENJAMIN VAINU Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 29 July 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Goddard and Andrews
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Haynes, 2010-Ohio-944.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO -vs- JAMES HAYNES Plaintiff-Appellee JUDGES Julie A. Edwards, P.J. W. Scott Gwin,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY TO30332 Q U E E N RICHARD GEOFFREY BULL SENTENCE OF LAURENSON J.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY TO30332 Q U E E N v RICHARD GEOFFREY BULL Hearing: 1-4 March 2004 Appearances: Mr Crayton for the Crown Mr Pyke for the Prisoner Judgment: 6 April 2004
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 08-616 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES M. WILLIAMS ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU,
More informationBETWEEN THE STATE RAMDEO RAMDEEN BHAGWANDEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Criminal Number S 045 /06 BETWEEN THE STATE V RAMDEO RAMDEEN BHAGWANDEEN Before Boodoosingh J. Mr A. Stroude and Ms A. Mohammed for The State
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Her Majesty the Queen. against. Corey Blair Clarke
Citation: R v Clarke Date:20050216 2005 PCSCTD 10 Docket:S 1 GC 384 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Her Majesty the Queen against Corey Blair
More informationCriminal Law Guidebook - Chapter 12: Sentencing and Punishment
The following is a suggested solution to the problem on page 313. It represents an answer of an above average standard. The ILAC approach to problem-solving as set out in the How to Answer Questions section
More informationPOLICY FOR DEALING WITH VIOLENCE, THREATENING BEHAVIOUR AND ABUSE AGAINST ACADEMY STAFF OR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY
POLICY FOR DEALING WITH VIOLENCE, THREATENING BEHAVIOUR AND ABUSE AGAINST ACADEMY STAFF OR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY Ratified by Governors/Principal: Principal Current ratification date: Spring
More informationDAVID KEITH SILBY Applicant. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent. A J Ewing for Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA428/2016 [2016] NZCA 592 BETWEEN AND DAVID KEITH SILBY Applicant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 18 October 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Cooper, Brewer
More informationROBERT JAMES CUMMINGS Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. RYAN WARREN GEARY-SMART Appellant. JACOB CHRISTOPHER GEARY-SMART Appellant
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA131/2015 [2016] NZCA 509 BETWEEN AND ROBERT JAMES CUMMINGS Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent CA132/2015 BETWEEN AND RYAN WARREN GEARY-SMART Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH CRI [2018] NZDC 1234 THE QUEEN MICKAL JAMES HAMMOND. S Lance for the Defendant
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT PALMERSTON NORTH CRI-2016-054-000949 [2018] NZDC 1234 THE QUEEN v MICKAL JAMES HAMMOND Hearing: 25 January 2018 Appearances: J Harvey for the Crown S Lance for the Defendant Judgment:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 23, 2014 v No. 316581 Wayne Circuit Court WILLIAM THEODORE-HARRY OLDS, LC No. 13-001170-FC Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC Plaintiff. THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND First Defendant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2016-404-000544 [2016] NZHC 2237 UNDER THE Judicature Amendment Act 1972, Section 4 BETWEEN AND KARL NUKU Plaintiff THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA COURT OF APPEAL
-1 SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA COURT OF APPEAL No 846 of 2008 THE QUEEN v MAGID SAID --- JUDGES: WHERE HELD: MAXWELL P, ASHLEY JA and COGHLAN AJA MELBOURNE DATE OF HEARING: 20 October 2009 DATE OF JUDGMENT:
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 16, 2015 106042 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TROY PARKER,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : vs. : No. 133-CR-2012 : CARLOS AGUIRRE, : Defendant : Cynthia Dyrda-Hatton, Esquire Assistant
More informationAssault Definitive Guideline
Assault Definitive Guideline DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Contents For reference Assault only. Definitive Guideline 1 Applicability of guideline 2 Causing grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily
More information1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GRENADA 2. MARCIA TOUSSAINT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE GRENADA CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2006/0160 BETWEEN: ALBERTHA STEPHEN CLAIMANT and 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GRENADA 2.
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : CR-1190-2015 : v. : : JAMES EDWARD NOTTINGHAM, : 1925a Defendant : 11, 2017. Background OPINION IN SUPPORT OF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Bradforth [2003] QCA 183 PARTIES: R v BRADFORTH, Nathan Paul (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 423 of 2002 SC No 551 of 2002 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT:
More informationLoveless, Allen, and Derry: Complete Criminal Law 6e, Chapter 02
Think box 2.1 D attends a show by a famous hypnotist in the course of which he is conditioned to embrace anyone wearing a uniform. After the show, a police officer (V) approaches D to tell him he is illegally
More informationNOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 139 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1985. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA142/07 [2007] NZCA 424 THE QUEEN v GEORGE DARREN
More informationPUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit November 17, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TOKOROA CRI [2017] NZDC NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor. BANABA KAITAI Defendant
EDITORIAL NOTE: NO SUPPRESSION APPLIED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT TOKOROA CRI-2016-063-004445 [2017] NZDC 6093 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor v BANABA KAITAI Defendant Hearing: 22 March 2017 Appearances:
More informationDISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF SHASTA Gerald PRESSC. RELEASE Benito District Attorney Robert J. Maloney Assistant District Attorney PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH The Facts
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI [2017] NZDC THE QUEEN TULUA DANIEL TANOAI (AKA) ARETA MARK TANOAI
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND CRI-2017-004-004019 [2017] NZDC 20334 THE QUEEN v TULUA DANIEL TANOAI (AKA) ARETA MARK TANOAI Hearing: 8 September 2017 Appearances: A Linterman for the Crown M Pecotic
More informationSTANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences
STANSFIELD COLLEGE CRIMINAL LAW Non-Fatal Offences 2013-2014 CRIMINAL LAW LECTURE 2005 A Q6 1 H hears a rumour that I, his partner, has been unfaithful to him. He grabs at her shoulder but she ducks and
More informationLEVI HOHEPA REUBEN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Appellant. Randerson, Clifford and Whata JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA454/2016 [2017] NZCA 138 BETWEEN AND LEVI HOHEPA REUBEN Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent CA473/2016 BETWEEN AND AKUHATUA TIHI Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 25, 2003 v No. 235966 Ingham Circuit Court LENG YANG, LC No. 00-075519-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, DONNA MAE BASTYR DOB: 05/01/1972 8110 12 AVE S #207 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More information[2001] QCA 54 COURT OF APPEAL. McMURDO P THOMAS JA WILSON J. No 238 of 2000 THE QUEEN. Applicant BRISBANE JUDGMENT
[2001] QCA 54 COURT OF APPEAL McMURDO P THOMAS JA WILSON J No 238 of 2000 THE QUEEN v S Applicant BRISBANE..DATE 21/02/2001 JUDGMENT 1 21022001 T3/FF14 M/T COA40/2001 THE PRESIDENT: Justice Wilson will
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA386/2011 [2011] NZCA 610. Applicant. MANA COACH SERVICES LTD Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA386/2011 [2011] NZCA 610 BETWEEN AND BEATRICE KATZ Applicant MANA COACH SERVICES LTD Respondent Hearing: 20 October 2011 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Glazebrook, Arnold
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1087 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paris
More information