Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013
|
|
- Milton Scott
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing Date: Thursday 4 July 2013 to Friday 5 July 2013 Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Hilton Belfast, 4 Lanyon Place, Belfast BT1 3LP Name of Registrant Nurse: Mr Otis Tapfumaneyi Mutyambizi NMC PIN: 99Y0144E Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Mental Health March 2002 Area of Registered Address: Northern Ireland Type of Case: Misconduct/Conviction Panel Members: Timothy Cole (Chair, Lay member) Geraldine Bevan (Registrant member) Nalini Chavda (Lay member) Legal Assessor: Conor Heaney Panel Secretary: Ben Fielding Representation: Present and represented by Mr Patrick Morgan, Flynn and McGettrick Solicitors Nursing and Midwifery Council: Represented by Mr Tom Hoskins, counsel, instructed by NMC Regulatory Legal Team. Facts proved: 1,2,3,4 Facts not proved: none Fitness to practise: impaired Page 1 of 14
2 Sanction: 5 year Caution Order Interim Order: N/A Page 2 of 14
3 Mr Mutyambizi, Details of charge: That you, a registered nurse: 1) On 11 January 2011 at the Petty Sessions District of Lisburn Magistrates Court, Northern Ireland, were convicted of driving a vehicle with excess alcohol and were sentenced to 3 years disqualification and fined ) On 1 March 2011 at the Petty Sessions District of Belfast and Newtownabbey Magistrates Court, Northern Ireland were convicted of: a) driving a motor vehicle without being the holder of a driving licence authorising you to drive a motor vehicle of that class and were sentenced to a fine of b) used a motor vehicle without a policy of insurance or such a security in respect of third party risk and were sentenced to a fine of 250 c) obstructing a constable and were sentenced to a fine of ) On 23 December 2010 without having the consent of the owner took a motor vehicle for your own or another s use. 4) On 26 July 2011 at the Petty Sessions District of Lisburn Magistrates Court, Northern Ireland, were convicted of: a) driving a motor vehicle without being the holder of a driving licence authorising you to drive a motor vehicle of that class and sentenced to a fine of and disqualified from driving for 1 year. b) used a motor vehicle without a policy of insurance or such a security in respect of third party risk and were sentenced to a fine of were disqualified from driving for 1 year and were ordered to forfeit the said Mercedes car. Page 3 of 14
4 And in light of the above your fitness to practice is impaired by reason of your conviction(s) in relation to charges 1) and/or 2) and/or 4) above and your misconduct in relation to charge 3). Decision on the findings on facts and reasons: The charges in this matter arose from two incidents in December You gave evidence under oath to the panel that on 9 December 2010 you had attended a public house to watch a football match with friends. At or around 2345 you left the establishment and sought to get a taxi home along with your friends because, while you did not think you were intoxicated, you were unsure if your blood alcohol concentration was below the limit prescribed by law. At approximately 0100, having failed to hire a taxi you made the decision to drive yourself and your friends home. En route you were stopped by the police and underwent a breath test. You were then arrested on suspicion of driving while under the influence of alcohol and taken to the local police station and having failed an evidential breath sample test you were charged. It is from this incident that charges 1 and 4 arose. On the evening of 23 December 2010 you gave evidence that while your wife was asleep you and a friend took your family car without her permission and drove to a Tesco supermarket to buy groceries. En route you were stopped by the police and admitted that you did not have a driving licence. You also, initially gave the police a false identity. You were then arrested on suspicion of driving a vehicle without a licence and while being taken to the police car then admitted to the constable that you had given a false identity and subsequently provided your correct name. It if from this incident that charges 2 and 3 arose. Having been provided with a copy of the certificate of conviction, the panel finds that the facts, relation to charges 1, 2 and 4, are found proved in accordance with Rule 31(2) which states: 31 - (2) Where a registrant has been convicted of a criminal offence (a) a copy of the certificate of conviction, certified by a competent officer of a Court in the United Kingdom (or, in Scotland, an extract of conviction) shall be conclusive proof of the conviction; and (b) the findings of fact upon which the conviction is based shall be admissible as proof of those facts. Page 4 of 14
5 The panel noted that you also admitted all of the charges in this matter including charge 3: 3) On 23 December 2010 without having the consent of the owner took a motor vehicle for your own or another s use. On 1 March 2011 at the Petty Sessions District of Belfast and Newtownabbey you were convicted of without having the consent of the owner or other lawful authority took a motor vehicle and were given a conditional discharge. The panel noted that under the article 6(1) of the Criminal Justice (NI) Order 1996, a conviction resulting in a conditional discharge shall be deemed not to be a conviction for any purpose other than the proceedings in which the order is made. Accordingly the panel found this charge proved by way of your admission. Determination on misconduct and impairment Having announced its findings on all the facts, the panel then moved on to consider firstly whether the facts found proved in relation to charge 3 amount to misconduct and, if so, secondly whether your fitness to practise is currently impaired by reason of misconduct and / or convictions. The NMC has defined fitness to practise as a registrant s suitability to remain on the register unrestricted. In his submissions Mr Hoskins invited the panel to take the view that your actions amount to a breach of The code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives 2008 ( the code ). He then directed the panel to specific paragraphs and identified where, in the NMC s view, your actions amounted to misconduct: 49 You must adhere to the laws of the country in which you are practising. 61 You must uphold the reputation of your profession at all times. Mr Hoskins referred the panel to the case of Roylance v GMC (no. 2) [2000] 1 AC 311 which defines misconduct as a word of general effect, involving some act or omission which falls short of what would be proper in the circumstances Page 5 of 14
6 In respect of Charges 1, 2 and 4, Mr Hoskins submitted to the panel that in this matter the panel must determine if your convictions taken individually and collectively were serious in nature and in relation to charge 3, if your proven actions amounted to misconduct. Mr Hoskins submitted that you have been convicted of driving a vehicle with excess alcohol and this was a serious charge. By driving while intoxicated you had placed the public at risk of harm. Further you had also been convicted of driving a motor vehicle without being the holder of a driving licence and without insurance. Mr Hoskins submitted that you had given evidence that if you had been involved in an accident while uninsured this could have serious consequences to any other member of the public that might have been involved and accordingly this was also a serious charge and that it also put the public at risk. In relation to your conviction for obstructing a constable, as represented by charge 2(c), Mr Hoskins referred to your evidence that you gave a false identity to the constable because you had panicked and on realising you had done something wrong admitted this to the constable and gave your correct details. Mr Hoskins submitted that this explanation was not correct and instead the real motivation for providing the false identity was to try and avoid being arrested for not holding a licence or insurance, and it was only on arrest and realising that your attempt to avoid arrest had been unsuccessful did you provide your correct details. He contended you did this in order to minimise the severity of charges you were facing. Mr Hoskins submitted that your actions in obstructing a constable contained an element of dishonesty. Having provided submissions on the conviction charges he moved on to charge 3. Mr Hoskins submitted that while your conditional discharge for the offence of driving a motor without having the consent of the owner could not be considered a conviction at this hearing, you had still broken the laws of the United Kingdom and consequently had breached point 49 of the Code. In being convicted of this offence, he submitted that your actions were serious and fell below the standard to be expected of a registered nurse. He then moved on to the issue of impairment, and addressed the panel on the need to have regard to protecting the public and the wider public interest. This included the need to declare and maintain proper standards and maintain public confidence in the profession and the NMC as a regulatory body. Mr Hoskins referred the panel to the cases of Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence v (1) Nursing and Midwifery Council (2) Grant [2011] EWHC 927 (Admin). Page 6 of 14
7 Mr Hoskins referred the panel to Exhibit 1 and the extract of your PNC check detailing your previous convictions. Mr Hoskins noted that in 2000 you were convicted at the South Cheshire Magistrates Court for driving whilst disqualified and using a vehicle while uninsured. In 2003 you were convicted at the Manchester City Magistrates Court of driving a motor vehicle with excess alcohol. Mr Hoskins submitted that these previous convictions showed that on the dates of the two incidents that led to the charges in this matter you would have been fully aware of the regulatory regime in the United Kingdom governing the use of a motor vehicle. Therefore by driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated on one occasion, driving while unlicensed and uninsured on two occasions, while fully aware that you should not have done so, Mr Hoskins submitted that you had brought the profession into disrepute in the past. Further you had also breached a fundamental tenet of the profession, namely that a registered nurse should uphold the laws of the country in which they are practising. Mr Hoskins submitted that you had shown only limited insight into the seriousness of the charges, that you had not given a full and frank apology and accordingly it was not possible to rule out repetition of the alleged misconduct in the future. Therefore not only had you brought the profession into disrepute and breached a fundamental tenet of the profession in the past but that it was also likely that you do so again in the future. Mr Hoskins submitted that in this case there was no evidence before the panel that called in to question your clinical practice. However he submitted the panel should find that by bringing the profession into disrepute and breaching a fundamental tenet of the profession, and the risk that you would do so again, your fitness to practice is currently impaired. Mr Morgan on your behalf submitted that the convictions that were the subject of the charges in this matter occurred over a very brief period of the time and you had not offended since December Further the charges related solely to the driving of a motor vehicle in your personal life and were not connected to your clinical practice as a registered nurse. Mr Morgan submitted that you were not a habitual offender and for these reasons the charges were not serious enough to constitute misconduct. Mr Morgan went on to refer to charge 2(c), namely the obstruction of a constable and submitted that while this was dishonest, it was dishonesty borne out of your panicked response to being stopped by the police and you had confirmed your correct identity in a matter of minutes. Mr Morgan then referred the panel to the circumstances surrounding charge 3. Mr Morgan noted that the car you had taken was the family car and the only reason you had been charged Page 7 of 14
8 with the offence of taking a car without authorisation was that you and your wife were placed in the unenviable situation that if you did not admit this then the police would have charged your wife with allowing a person to use the vehicle who did not hold a licence and was not insured. Mr Morgan referred the panel to the testimonials on your behalf before the panel that your work as a registered nurse was exemplary and that you had taken rehabilitive steps regarding your driving by attending a Drink/Drive Rehabilitation Course to not only improve your driving skills but to minimise any damage to the reputation of the professions. Accordingly Mr Morgan submitted that your convictions and / or actions did not constitute misconduct and your fitness to practice is not currently impaired. The panel has accepted the advice of the legal assessor which included reference to a number of judgments which are relevant, these included: Roylance v General Medical Council (No 2) [2000] 1 A.C. 311, Ronald Jack Cohen v General Medical Council [2008] EWHC 581 (Admin), Brennan v Health Professions Council [2011] EWHC 41 (Admin), Decision on whether the facts found proved in charge 3 amount to misconduct: When determining whether the facts found proved amount to misconduct the panel had regard to the terms of the code in force at that time, namely the May 2008 edition. The panel in reaching its decision had regard to the public interest and accepted that there was no burden or standard at this stage of proof and exercised its own professional judgement. The panel was of the view that your actions do fall significantly short of the standards expected of a registered nurse, and that your actions do amount to a breach of the code. Specifically; 49 You must adhere to the laws of the country in which you are practising. 61 You must uphold the reputation of your profession at all times. The panel appreciated that breaches of the code do not automatically result in a finding of misconduct. The panel consider charge 3 and if your actions amounted to misconduct. The panel found that while you did take a motor vehicle without authorisation, the vehicle was your family car and the Page 8 of 14
9 panel considered that there would have been an implied right for you to use the vehicle in most circumstances. The panel noted that there was no evidence before it that you had been implicitly denied authorisation to use the vehicle by its owner, in this case your wife. The panel also considered that if you had not admitted to this charge it would have resulted in your wife being charged with allowing you to use the vehicle while you did not possess a licence and were uninsured with possibly severe ramifications for your family including your children. The panel found that while you have breached point 49 of the Code by your actions, there were extenuating circumstances and determined that it could not be characterised as serious misconduct. The panel therefore finds that misconduct is not made out in this case. Decision on impairment: The panel next went on to decide your fitness to practise is currently impaired by reason of your convictions. The panel found that you have been convicted of six separate offences relating to two incidents in December The panel considered that by driving a motor vehicle while you were uninsured and unlicensed to do so on two occasions, and while intoxicated on one occasion you placed members of the public at risk of harm and accordingly the panel concluded that these were serious offences. The panel also found that by giving false information to a constable, even if only for a short period of time, you acted dishonestly and in doing so engaged in conduct that fell well below the standard expected of a registered nurse. Regarding insight, you gave evidence as to your reasons for why you chose to drive a motor vehicle, when you knew you were unlicensed to do so, on 10 December 2010 and 23 December In relation to 10 December 2010 it was because you were unable to find a taxi, even though at the very least you knew that you were unlicensed and suspected that you might be over the legal blood alcohol limited. On 23 December 2010 you drove, even though you knew you were unlicensed because you wanted to get groceries from a Tesco store. However the panel considered that you did not provide any evidence as to why you felt these circumstances justified you breaking the law on each occasion. Page 9 of 14
10 Further, you have admitted under oath that your actions have brought the professions into disrepute and would reflect badly on your practice in front of patients, colleagues and the wider public, but have expressed limited remorse as to the effect of your convictions on the reputation of the profession and on you as a registered nurse. Nurses occupy a position of privilege and trust in society and are expected at all times to be professional. To justify that trust, nurses must be honest and open and act with integrity. They must make sure that their conduct at all times justifies both their patients and the public s trust in the profession. In this regard the panel considered the judgement of Mrs Justice Cox in the case of Grant in reaching its decision, in paragraph 74 she said; 74. In determining whether a practitioner s fitness to practise is impaired by reason of misconduct, the relevant panel should generally consider not only whether the practitioner continues to present a risk to members of the public in his or her current role, but also whether the need to uphold proper professional standards and public confidence in the profession would be undermined if a finding of impairment were not made in the particular circumstances. Mrs Justice Cox went on to say in Paragraph 76: 76. I would also add the following observations in this case having heard submissions, principally from Ms McDonald, as to the helpful and comprehensive approach to determining this issue formulated by Dame Janet Smith in her Fifth Report from Shipman, referred to above. At paragraph she identified the following as an appropriate test for panels considering impairment of a doctor s fitness to practise, but in my view the test would be equally applicable to other practitioners governed by different regulatory schemes. 77. Do our findings of fact in respect of the doctor s misconduct, deficient professional performance, adverse health, conviction, caution or determination show that his/her fitness to practise is impaired in the sense that s/he: a. has in the past acted and/or is liable in the future to act so as to put a patient or patients at unwarranted risk of harm; and/or b. has in the past brought and/or is liable in the future to bring the medical profession into disrepute; and/or Page 10 of 14
11 c. has in the past breached and/or is liable in the future to breach one of the fundamental tenets of the medical profession; and/or d.. The panel find that by being convicted of several offences you have brought the profession into disrepute. Further you have also breached a fundamental tenet of the profession, namely that you have failed to always act lawfully, whether those laws relate to your professional practice or personal life. The panel is of the view that there is a risk of repetition based on limited insight into your actions. Of particular concern to the panel is that you were unable to provide any evidence to the panel as to any justification or extenuating circumstances that could explain why you chose to break the law. The panel also considered your evidence, under cross examination, that you were unable to say with absolute certainty that you would not be convicted of these offences again in the future. The panel acknowledged that none of the convictions before them are related to your clinical practice, but by failing to adhere to the laws of the country in which you are practicing, and doing so on several instances you have breached the Code and brought the profession into disrepute. The panel had borne in mind that its primary function was not only to protect patients but also the wider public interest which includes maintaining confidence in the nursing profession and upholding the proper standards and behaviour. Having regard to all of the above, the panel is satisfied that your fitness to practise is currently impaired. Decision on sanction and reasons: Mr Hoskins referred the panel to the indicative sanctions guidance. Mr Hoskins submitted the question of which, if any sanction should be imposed, was purely a matter for professional judgement of the panel. Mr Morgan submitted that the panel should have regard to both the public interest and your own interest. The purpose of a sanction was to protect the public and the public interest and not to punish you. Mr Morgan drew the panel s attention to, what in his view, were the mitigating factors including: there was no evidence of patient harm; no repetition of the proven charges; Page 11 of 14
12 you made an early admission to the charges; you have worked as a registered nurse for 11 years; you have not been the subject of any disciplinary process; you have taken rehabilitive steps including the completing of a Drink/Drive Rehabilitation Course; you have provided testimonials confirming your safe clinical practice and your general practitioner has confirmed that there is no evidence that you misuse alcohol or drugs. Mr Morgan submitted that you are the sole provider for your family which included four children. For these reasons Mr Morgan submitted that a caution order should be imposed by the panel. The panel has considered this case very carefully and has decided to make a Caution Order for 5 years. The effect of this order is that your name on the NMC register will show that you are subject to a caution order and anyone who enquires about your registration will be informed of this order. In reaching this decision the panel has had regard to all the evidence that has been adduced in this case. The panel accepted the advice of the legal assessor. The panel has borne in mind that any sanction imposed must be reasonable, appropriate and proportionate, and although not intended to be punitive in its effect, it may have such consequences. The panel had careful regard to the Indicative Sanctions Guidance published by the NMC. It recognised that the decision on sanction is a matter for the panel exercising its own independent judgement. The panel first considered whether to take no action but concluded that this would be inappropriate in view of the seriousness of the case. The panel decided that it would be neither proportionate nor in the public interest to take no further action. Next, in considering whether a caution order would be appropriate in the circumstances, the panel took into account the Indicative Sanctions Guidance, which states that a caution order may be appropriate where the case is at the lower end of the spectrum of impaired fitness to practise and the panel wishes to mark that the behaviour was unacceptable and must not happen again.. The panel noted that you made early admissions to the charges and gave evidence to this panel that your convictions had damaged the reputation of the profession and yourself as a registered nurse. You have also engaged with the NMC since referral. The panel has been told that there have been no adverse findings in relation to your practice either before or since these convictions. Page 12 of 14
13 However the panel also found that by being convicted of several offences related to your driving, including the obstruction of constable, you have called into question the reputation of the professions and have acted in a way that is completely unacceptable for a registered nurse. The panel considered its obligation to maintain proper standards of behaviour and uphold the reputation of the professions was a serious matter in the public interest. The panel wishes to make it clear that if there had been any evidence before it: that you had again been convicted of similar offences since 2010; there was a doubt regarding your clinical practice and / or this was not your first appearance before a practice committee of the Conduct and Competence Committee, the decision of this panel may have been substantially different and it may have considered that you should no longer have the privilege of practising as a registered nurse. The panel considered whether it would be proportionate to impose a more restrictive sanction in this particular matter and looked at conditions of practice. The panel found that this matter is unrelated to your clinical practice and it would not be possible to formulate practical conditions of practice that would address the damage you have caused to the reputation of the profession. The panel concluded that no useful purpose would be served by a conditions of practice order as it is not necessary to protect the public and would not address the public interest in this matter. The panel further considered that a suspension order would be disproportionate in your case. The panel has decided that a caution order would adequately address the public interest in this matter. For the next 5 years your employer or any prospective employer will be on notice that your fitness to practise had found to be impaired and that your practice is subject to a restriction. Having considered the general principles above and looking at the totality of the findings on the evidence the panel has determined that to impose a caution order for the maximum period of 5 years would be the appropriate and proportionate response. It would mark not only the importance of maintaining public confidence in the profession, but also send the public and the profession a clear message about the standards required of a registered nurse. At the end of this period the note on your entry in the register will be removed. However, the NMC will keep a record of the panel s finding that your fitness to practise had been found impaired. If the NMC receives a further allegation that your fitness to practice is impaired, the record of this panel s finding and decision will be made available to any practice committee that considers the further allegation. Page 13 of 14
14 This decision will be confirmed to you in writing. Page 14 of 14
Nursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Friday, 5 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Razvan
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 22 July 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Nomathemba Amanda Primrose Socikwa 10G0506E
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting NMC, 20 Old Bailey, London, EC4M 7LN 18 June 2014 Name of Registrant: Mr Matthew Robin Pitts NMC PIN: 93A0777E Part(s) of the register: Registered Nurse
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting Monday 17 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Miss Vicky Cross 10I0617E Part(s)
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 26 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of Registrant Nurse: Mr Richard Imperio NMC
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MARQUEZ LOPEZ, Daniel Registration No: 260732 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 OUTCOME: Fitness to Practise Impaired. Reprimand Issued Daniel MARQUEZ LOPEZ, a dentist, Grado
More informationConduct & Competence Committee. Substantive Meeting. 20 October Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ
Conduct & Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 20 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, London E20 1EJ Registrant: NMC PIN: Sean Michael Ridout 10H3375E Part(s) of the register:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 6 March 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 114-116 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4LH Name of registrant: Deborah Iris Gallagher
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 16 July 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 20 October 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant: NMC
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council:
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 23 February 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC AYOR-AYO, Auma Hilda Registration No: 198660 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Suspended for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Auma Hilda AYOR-AYO,
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC UPTON, Natalie Jane Registration No: 110087 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JULY 2018 Outcome: Suspension for 12 months with immediate suspension (with a review) Natalie UPTON, a
More information3.2 The Code to maintain patient safety and public confidence in the profession.
OUTCOME OF FITNESS TO PRACTISE HEARING Case Number 2013/01 Name Paul John Tallon Registration Number 3560 Date of Hearing 5 th 6 th and 14 th June 2013 The Notice of Allegation The Chairman of the Statutory
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 1 December 2017 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Part(s) of the register:
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 31 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), Regus, Cromac Square, Belfast BT2 8LA
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Hearing 31 October 2016 Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), Regus, Cromac Square, Belfast BT2 8LA Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Aaron Ravel 91A1968E Part(s)
More informationAllegation and Findings of Fact That being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 06/11/2017 07/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Erik MILNER GMC reference number: 3317501 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 1989 University
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BANNATYNE, Ashleigh Registration No: 214342 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE JUNE 2017 - JUNE 2018* Most recent outcome: Suspension extended for 12 months (with a review) *See page
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Fitness to Practise Committee. Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing 17 December 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of registrant: NMC
More informationINDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT
INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE DRAFT Contents Purpose of document... 2 What is this document about?... 2 Who is this document for?... 3 1. Part 1: Fitness to Practise stages... 3 Investigation... 3 Scrutiny
More informationGood decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance
Good decision making: Fitness to practise hearings and sanctions guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or
More informationPart(s) of the register: Registered Nurse Sub Part 1. Eileen Skinner (Chair Lay member) Colin Kennedy (Lay member) Catherine Gale (Registrant member)
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting (CPD) Date: Thursday 13 August 2015 Nursing and Midwifery Council 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 26/07/ /07/2018. GMC reference number: Tyne
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 26/07/2018-27/07/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Neil Ineson GMC reference number: 2431350 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB BS 1978 University
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LIMBU, Dino Registration No: 246153 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2015 Outcome: Fitness to practise impaired; erasure with an immediate suspension order Dinu LIMBU, a dental
More informationHealth and Character Declarations Policy
Introduction Health and Character Declarations Policy The Health and Social Work Professions Order 2001 (the Order) provides that registration decisions, including decisions on whether a person meets the
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 15/08/ /08/2018. GMC reference number:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/08/2018-17/08/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Zholia Alemi GMC reference number: 4246372 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct MB ChB 1992 University
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 19/06/ /06/2018 & 2 August GMC reference number:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 19/06/2018 21/06/2018 & 2 August 2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Muhammad Bhatti GMC reference number: 6067212 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution
More informationMinutes of Investigation Committee (Oral) hearing
Minutes of Investigation Committee (Oral) hearing Date of hearing: 19 May 2017 Name of doctor: Dr Richard Allan Reference Number: 6055488 Registered qualifications: BM BCh 2002 Oxford University Committee
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE*
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE* *The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from this text. GRAHAM, Lisa Marie Registration
More informationNotice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee
Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee Name: Radu Nasca SCR No: 6005361 Date: 22 August 2014 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Conduct Committee of the Northern
More informationImpaired Impaired. instructed
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/05/2018 21/05/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Martin GEORGE GMC reference number: 6094870 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution New - Misconduct
More informationHEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE
HEARING PARTLY HEARD IN PRIVATE The Committee has made a determination in this case that includes some private information. That information has been omitted from the text. ROBERTSON, Harry Gordon Registration
More informationPart(s) of the register: RNHM, Registered nurse sub part 1 Mental health Sept 2011 Area of Registered Address: England
Nursing and Midwifery Council Fitness to Practise Committee Substantive Hearing Consensual Panel Disposal 26 January 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20
More informationGood decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance
Good decision making: Investigating committee meetings and outcomes guidance Revised March 2017 The text of this document (but not the logo and branding) may be reproduced free of charge in any format
More informationGuidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance
Guidance for the Practice Committees including Indicative Sanctions Guidance Effective 1 st October 2016 1 2 Contents 1 Introduction and background... 4 2 The Professional Conduct Committee (PCC)... 5
More informationUniversiteto. That being registered under the Medical Act 1983, as amended:
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 29/01/2018 30/01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ali ISMAIL GMC reference number: 6168323 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct Gydytojas 2006 Kauno Medicinos
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 16/10/ /10/2017
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 16/10/2017 18/10/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Johannes Christiaan Hermanus BASSON GMC reference number: 4056885 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC HOUGHTON, Nicola Louise Registration No: 130502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2015 Outcome: Erasure (with immediate order) Nicola Louise HOUGHTON, Verified competency
More informationThat being registered under the Medical Act 1983 (as amended):
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 09/11/2017 10/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Andrew MACKENZIE GMC reference number: 6134691 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 2006
More informationGuide to sanctioning
Guide to sanctioning Contents 1. Background. 2 2. Application for registration or continued registration 3 3. Purpose of sanctions. 3 4. Principles in determining sanction.. 4 A. Proportionality... 4 B.
More informationGUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationConduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ
Conduct and Competence Committee Substantive Meeting 23 December 2015 at 2 Stratford Place, Montfichet Road, London, E20 1EJ Name of Registrant Nurse: NMC PIN: Richard James Rees 01I2055E Part(s) of the
More informationRe: Dr Jonathan Richard Ashton v GMC [2013] EWHC 943 Admin
Appeals Circular A11/13 14 06 2013 To: Fitness to Practise Panel Panellists Legal Assessors Copy: Interim Orders Panel Panellists Investigation Committee Panellists Panel Secretaries Medical Defence Organisations
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 15/01/ /01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Baldeep AUJLA
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 15/01/2018 23/01/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Baldeep AUJLA GMC reference number: 7084996 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution New - Misconduct
More informationIn accordance with Rule 41 of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 the hearing was held in public.
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 27/11/2018-29/11/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Stamatios OIKONOMOU GMC reference number: 6072884 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct Ptychio Iatrikes
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC CROOK, Stacey Registration No: 199655 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE AUGUST 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension This case was heard in parallel with the case of MOLLOY,
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC LARKIN, Matthew Peter Registration No: 74917 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2017 Outcome: Erased with Immediate Suspension Matthew Peter LARKIN, a dentist, BDS Lpool 1998
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC MAYCOCK, Andrew Edward Registration No: 170502 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2018 Outcome: Erased with Immediate order of Suspension Andrew Edward MAYCOCK, a dental nurse,
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC BAPU, Raisha Registration No: 110944 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE MAY 2015 Outcome: Erasure and immediate suspension Raisha BAPU, a dental nurse, NVQ L3 Oral Health Care:Dental
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 13/11/ /11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Katy MCALLISTER
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 13/11/2017 15/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Katy MCALLISTER GMC reference number: 7042366 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB ChB 2009
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 01/11/2017 03/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Mohamed AMRANI GMC reference number: 3419692 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MD 1987 Universite
More informationDETERMINATION ON THE FACTS AND IMPAIRMENT - 25/10/2017
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 25 to 26 October 2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Swathi Deepak PAI GMC reference number: 5202874 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Misconduct MB BS 1998 Manipal
More informationHealth and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE. Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired
Health and Care Professions Tribunal Service PRACTICE NOTE Finding that Fitness to Practise is Impaired This Practice Note has been issued by the Council for the Guidance of Panels and to assist those
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 20/02/2017 22/02/2017 & 12/06/2017 13/06/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Hadiza BAWA-GARBA GMC reference number: 6080659 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction
More informationNRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE
NRPSI INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE Introduction Purpose of sanctions Warnings What sanctions are available Questions for the Panel to consider Mitigation and aggravating factors Guidance on considering
More information4. This guidance is a public document and is available from the GOC s website at:
GUIDANCE FOR CASE EXAMINERS The purpose of this guidance 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) recognises that it is important that patients, registrants, professional and representative organisations,
More informationNotice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee
Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee Name: Paula Curran Registration No: 2002171 Date: 30 January 2013 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Conduct Committee of
More information[2015] EWHC 854 (QB) 2015 WL
Dr Saima Alam v The General Medical Council Case No: CO/4949/2014 High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division Administrative Court 27 March 2015 [2015] EWHC 854 (QB) 2015 WL 1310679 Before: Mr Justice
More informationIf this declaration is more than three months old, we will ask you to complete a new one before we grant your application.
Please write clearly in black ink and use CAPITAL LETTERS All dates must be written in the format DD/MM/YYYY If you need more space please use the supplementary information sheet at the end of this form
More informationNon-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals
Non-compliance hearings guidance for medical practitioners tribunals Introduction 1 The aim of this guidance is to promote consistency and transparency in decision making relating to non-compliance hearings.
More informationHEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC
HEARING HEARD IN PUBLIC JAMALI, Nisreen Registration No: 86173 PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE September 2014 Outcome: Erased with immediate suspension. Nisreen JAMALI, BDS Karachi 2002, Statutory Exam
More informationConsolidated Practice Committee Rules
Consolidated Practice Committee Rules Health and Care Professions Council (Practice Committees and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 Health and Care Professions Council (Investigating Committee) (Procedure)
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 08/11/2017 10/11/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Imran QURESHI GMC reference number: 7063588 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New Conviction/Caution MB BS 1997 University
More informationCONSOLIDATED PRACTICE COMMITTEE RULES
CONSOLIDATED PRACTICE COMMITTEE RULES Health and Care Professions Council (Practice Committees and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 Health and Care Professions Council (Investigating Committee) (Procedure)
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Dates: 20/04/ /04/2017 (Adjourned Part Heard) 02/10/2017 (Reconvened)
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 20/04/2017 27/04/2017 (Adjourned Part Heard) 02/10/2017 (Reconvened) Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ahmed Mohsen TOLBA GMC reference number: 6118042 Primary medical qualification:
More informationNursing and Midwifery Council: Investigating Committee. Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry. 25 September 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council Investigating Committee Fraudulent/Incorrect Entry Hearing 25 September 2018 Nursing and Midwifery Council, 61 Aldwych, London, WC2B 4AE Name of registrant: NMC PIN: Mr Harry
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Dates: 13/06/ /06/2018. GMC reference number: New - Conviction / Caution
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 13/06/2018-15/06/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Chizoro Edohasim GMC reference number: 6039653 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB BCh 1997
More informationWho this guidance is for and when it should be used
References to Good medical practice updated in March 2013 Guidance for the Investigation Committee and case examiners when considering allegations about a doctor s involvement in encouraging or assisting
More informationRe: Dr Fernando Hidalgo Martin v GMC [2014] EWHC 1269 Admin
Appeals Circular A25/14 16 October 2014 To: Interim Order Panellists Fitness to Practise Panellists Legal Assessors Copy: Investigation Committee Panellists Panel Secretaries Medical Defence Organisations
More informationVOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY
VOLUNTARY REGISTER OF DRIVING INSTRUCTORS GOVERNING POLICY 1 Introduction 1.1 In December 2014, the States approved the introduction of a mandatory Register of Driving Instructors, and the introduction
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations. Medical Practitioner: Date: 22/10/2018. GMC reference number: Medyczny. Review - Misconduct
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 22/10/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Shazia Akram GMC reference number: 7094045 Primary medical qualification: Type of case XXX Review - Misconduct Lekarz 2010 Warszawski Uniwersytet
More informationAdministrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines
Administrative Sanctions: imposing warnings and fines Introduction This leaflet provides an overview of the Bar Standards Board s (BSB s) use of administrative sanctions as one of the tools available to
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance Note
Indicative Sanctions Guidance Note Introduction The CAA Global Limited Board ( the Board ) has prepared this guidance note for use by Adjudication Panels, Interim Order Panel, Disciplinary Tribunal Panels
More informationDeclarations guidance for fullyqualified
Declarations guidance for fullyqualified registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for fully qualified optometrists and dispensing opticians, and those who
More informationDeclarations guidance for student registrants
Declarations guidance for student registrants How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. A guide for students. November 2013 Contents Who is this document for?... 3 About this
More informationSRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules
SRA Assessment of Character and Suitability Rules Introduction All individuals applying for admission or seeking restoration to the roll of solicitors or those applying to become or renewing their registration
More informationGuidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions
Guidance for decision makers on the impact of criminal convictions and cautions Page 1 of 11 Contents Introduction... 3 Reporting Criminal Proceedings... 4 General Principles... 5 Applications for Registration...
More informationIntroduction. Guidance on Warnings July 2017 Page 1 of 6
Guidance regarding warnings issued by Case Examiners and the Investigation Committee under the provisions of the General Optical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2013 Introduction 1. The General Optical
More informationThis case was reviewed on the papers, with the agreement of both parties, by a Legally Qualified Chair.
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 19 December 2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Hadiza BAWA-GARBA GMC reference number: 6080659 Primary medical qualification: Type of case Conviction/ Caution MB ChB 2003 University
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationFitness to Practise. > Criminal convictions and fitness to practise
Fitness to Practise February 2012 Criminal convictions and fitness to practise ebulletin Being convicted of a criminal offence will bring osteopaths before the GOsC s fitness to practise panels. A small
More informationSOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION
SOCIAL CARE WALES (INVESTIGATION) RULES 2017 INTERNAL VERSION APRIL 2017 PLEASE NOTE: this copy of the Rules is for the use of Social Care Wales staff, panel members, presenters and legal advisers only.
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
SOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No. 11442-2015 BETWEEN: SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY Applicant and OLUFEMI AKINWOLE OLUJINMI Respondent Before: Mrs J.
More informationDisciplinary Panel Hearing. Case of. Mr Jason Barkworth MRICS [ ] London SE7. On Wednesday 21 November At RICS 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham
Disciplinary Panel Hearing Case of Mr Jason Barkworth MRICS [5044119] London SE7 On Wednesday 21 November 2018 At RICS 55 Colmore Row, Birmingham Panel Alison Sansome (Panel Chair) Gillian Seager (Lay
More informationFOR FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE
FOR FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE Contents Pages 1. Introduction 5 2. Types of registrant 5 Individual registrants 5 Student registrants 5 Business registrants
More informationQuick Reference Guides to Out of Court Disposals
Quick Reference Guides to Out of Court Disposals Effective from: 8 th April 2013 Contents QUICK REFERENCE GUIDES TO INDIVIDUAL DISPOSALS 4 Out-of-Court Disposals overview 4 What? 4 Why? 4 When? 5 National
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal. Date: 05/12/2017. Medical practitioner s name: Dr Wladyslaw Stanislaw STANEK
PUBLIC RECORD Date: 05/12/2017 Medical practitioner s name: Dr Wladyslaw Stanislaw STANEK GMC reference number: 7344756 Primary medical qualification: Type of case Review - Non-compliance with an English
More informationRULES of the HONORABLE SOCIETY of the INN of COURT of NORTHERN IRELAND
. RULES of the HONORABLE SOCIETY of the INN of COURT of NORTHERN IRELAND WITH REGARD to the ADMISSION of STUDENTS into the SOCIETY and to the DEGREE of BARRISTER-AT-LAW WITH REGARD to the ADMISSION of
More informationRegulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration
Regulations for the consideration of criminal convictions for students on courses leading to professional registration Responsibility of: University Secretary Initial Approval date: 27 April 2016 Reviewed:
More informationPUBLIC RECORD. Record of Determinations Medical Practitioners Tribunal
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 03/04/2018 05/04/2018 Medical Practitioner s name: Mr Vimal HARIHARAN GMC reference number: 6130090 Primary medical qualification: Type of case New - Conviction / Caution MB BS 2005
More informationTHERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS.
THERE IS AN ORDER MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006 FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF MEDICAL DETAILS. PLEASE SEE ORDER 5 ON PAGE 10 FOR FULL SUPPRESSION DETAILS. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS
More informationGMC reference number: Primary medical qualification: MB ChB 2013 University of Glasgow. Impaired Impaired
PUBLIC RECORD Dates: 09/10/2017 11/10/2017 Medical Practitioner s name: Dr Ediz Halit EKREM GMC reference number: 7277403 Primary medical qualification: MB ChB 2013 University of Glasgow Type of case New
More informationIndicative Sanctions Guidance
Indicative Sanctions Guidance AAT is a registered charity. No. 1050724 Indicative Sanctions Guidance Contents Introduction... 3 Policy detail... 4 Sanctions... 5 Aggravating factors... 7 Mitigation...
More informationLCDT 015/10. of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1. Applicant. BRETT DEAN RAVELICH, of Auckland, Barrister
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2011] NZLCDT 11 LCDT 015/10 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 Applicant AND BRETT
More informationSANCTION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT
SANCTION GUIDANCE DOCUMENT November 2017 Introduction If a complaint is referred to the Disciplinary Committee of the Teaching Council for an inquiry, a panel of the Disciplinary Committee consisting of
More informationSOLICITORS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. IN THE MATTER OF THE SOLICITORS ACT 1974 Case No and. Before:
The Tribunal s Order in respect of sanction is subject to appeal to the High Court (Administrative Court) by the Applicant, the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The Order remains in force pending the High
More informationassist do not programme; is also Determination GSCC means [1]
Social Work Student Suitabilityy Scheme Introduction This Scheme applies to relevant programmes in social work w which, on a transitional basis, are being treated as approved by the HCPC. Its purpose is
More informationAnti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Response Policy. Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Response Policy 2018 Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group The Anti-Fraud, Bribery and Corruption Policy for Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
More informationAccountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance
Guidance Financial Reporting Council April 2018 Accountancy Scheme Sanctions Guidance The FRC s mission is to promote transparency and integrity in business. The FRC sets the UK Corporate Governance and
More information[ Nursing and Midwifery Council (Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules 2008 ] 1 (SI 2008/3148)
[ Nursing and Midwifery Council (Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules 2008 ] 1 (SI 2008/3148) Unofficial consolidated text Effective from 31 March 2017 This consolidated text has been produced for
More information