Forthcoming judgments
|
|
- Beverly Hines
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 149 (2011) Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 22 judgments on Tuesday 27 September 2011 and five on Thursday 29 September Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 10 a.m. (local time) on the Court s Internet site ( Tuesday 27 September 2011 Hrdalo v. Croatia (no /07) The applicant, Nikša Hrdalo, is a Croatian national who was born in 1958 and lives in Dubrovnik (Croatia). Formerly a high-ranking civil servant in the Dubrovnik-Neretva Administrative Office, Mr Hrdalo alleges that, in the course of proceedings concerning his removal from office, the domestic authorities breached the principle of equality of arms, violated his right to be presumed innocent and harmed his reputation. He relies in particular on Article 6 1 and 2 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights. A. Menarini Diagnostics S.R.L. v. Italy (no /08) The applicant, A. Menarini Diagnostics S.R.L., is an Italian company based in Florence (Italy). In 2001, the AGCM (Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato), the independent regulatory authority in charge of competition, investigated the company for unfair competition. In a decision of 30 April 2003 it fined the company 6 million euros for unfair competition on the diabetes diagnosis test market, stating that the penalty should serve as a deterrent to all pharmaceutical companies. All the company s appeals against that decision were rejected. Relying on Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial) of the Convention, the applicant company complains that it had no access to a court with full jurisdiction or to judicial review of the administrative decision of the AGCM. Cristina Boicenco v. Moldova (no /09) The applicant, Cristina Boicenco, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1985 and lives in Vulcanesti (Romania). She was given a job in a restaurant on 31 May 2004, but arrested and remanded in custody the very next day, on suspicion of having committed a theft in the restaurant. Released in June 2004, she was subsequently acquitted. The case concerns Ms Boicenco's complaint that she was unlawfully detained and that the compensation awarded by the domestic courts was inadequate and insufficient, in breach of Article 5 (right to liberty and security). Karbowniczek v. Poland (no /08) The applicant, Jarosław Karbowniczek, is a Polish national who was born in 1979 and lives in Wałbrzych (Poland). Convicted of a number of offences including forgery, battery and robbery and sentenced to seven years imprisonment in a final judgment in March 2011, he alleges that he was kicked and beaten by police officers while being transported to court to attend a hearing on his case and then in the court building itself. He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment). Further relying on Article 5 3 (right to liberty and security), he also complains that the length of his pretrial detention was excessive.
2 Archip v. Romania (no /08) The applicant, Constantin Archip, is a Romanian national who was born in 1976 and lives in Podoleni (Romania). In November 2005 Mr Archip was involved in an incident at Podoleni town hall during which he complained about the amount of sickness benefit he received for his coxarthrosis (arthritis of the hip) and ended up insulting the civil servants present. He alleges that, as a result, he was taken to the local police station, where he was hit by the mayor and then kept handcuffed to a tree for almost three hours in the cold in the courtyard, in full view of passers-by, resulting in the worsening of his medical condition. He also alleges that the ensuing investigation into his complaint was not effective. He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment). Demian v. Romania (no. 5614/05) The applicant, Ioan Tudorel Demian, is a Romanian national who was born in 1967 and lives in Satu Mare (Romania). He was sentenced to four years and two months imprisonment for theft. He was held in Baia Mare prison but transferred several times to Gherla prison. He complains that as a diabetes sufferer he was not given proper health care and food, and that this and the poor conditions of detention in both prisons adversely affected his health. He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment). M. and C. v. Romania (no /04) The applicants, C.M. and A.C., are Romanian nationals who were born in 1965 and 1994 respectively and live in Saint-Priest, France. They complain, in particular, about the failure of the Romanian authorities to ensure adequate protection of the second applicant, a minor, from alleged sexual abuse by his father and about there not being an effective remedy available to them in that respect. They rely on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 6 (right to a fair trial), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination). Alim v. Russia (no /07) The applicant, Mustafa Alim, is a Cameroonian national who was born in He arrived in Russia in 1995 as a football player. Following his arrest in January 2007 for breaching residence regulations for foreigners, a court fined him and ordered his removal from Russia and his detention pending removal. Released in July 2007 and currently living with his two small children and their mother in the Krasnodar region (Russia), Mr Alim complains about the conditions in which he was detained pending his removal and that his family life would suffer if he were removed from Russia. He relies in particular on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 5 1 (f) (right to liberty and security) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life). Beksultanova v. Russia (no /07) The applicant, Aminat Beksultanova, is a Russian national who was born in 1959 and lives in the village of Achkhoy-Martan in the Chechen Republic. She is the mother of Timur Beksultanov, born in 1980, who has not been seen since October 2004 when he was taken away from the family home by an officer from the police special-purpose squad for questioning about terrorist activities. She alleges that her son was detained and killed by Russian servicemen and that the domestic authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into her allegation. She relies on Article 2 (right to life), Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 5 (right to liberty and security), and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). 2
3 Diamante and Pelliccioni v. San Marino (no /08) The applicants are Augusta Diamante, an Italian national, born in 1973, and her daughter, Greta Pelliccioni, born in 2004, who has dual Italian and San Marinese nationality. Relying on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 6 (right to a fair trial), they complain about the care and custody proceedings concerning the second applicant before the San Marino courts, in particular a decision of February 2008 ordering the child to live with her father in San Marino and to be transferred to a nursery there, after having previously lived with her mother. They allege, among other things, that at the relevant hearing Ms Diamante was not duly represented, that the judge based his decision only on statements by the authorities and the father, despite his having previously abducted the child, and that the entire proceedings were excessively long. They further complain, under Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), that they did not have an effective domestic remedy in respect of the abduction as a result of the tribunal's decision to archive the case. Relying on Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement), Ms Diamante complains that, as a result of limitations imposed on her by the courts, her daughter was not allowed to leave San Marino from February to August Lastly, the applicants allege violations of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). Veysel Şahin v. Turkey (no. 4631/05) The applicant, Veysel Şahin, is a Turkish national who was born in 1967 and lives in Edirne. He was sentenced in 1994 to 20 years imprisonment for belonging to an illegal armed organisation, and for making, possessing and using explosives, and incarcerated in Edirne prison. In December 2000 the prison was the scene of hunger strikes which culminated in violent clashes between the detainees and the security forces. Mr Şahin was involved and subsequently charged with rebelling against the prison administration. On 2 February 2005 the Canakkale Assize Court forwarded an order for his release to the Edirne Public Prosecutor s Office, subject to the condition that he was not detained or convicted for any other offence. Mr Şahin was not released until three days later. He alleges that his continued detention between 2 and 5 February 2005 was in violation of Article 5 1 (right to liberty and security). Şişman and Others v. Turkey (no. 1305/05 The applicants, Akın Şişman, Sedat Altun, Mehmet Necmettin Araz and Hasan Turanlı, are Turkish nationals who were born respectively in 1976, 1975, 1962 and 1956 and live in Kocaeli. They are employees of the Alemdar (Kocaeli) and Tepecik (Kocaeli) tax directorates of the Ministry of Finance and at the relevant time they were board members of the local section of the Büro Emekçileri trade union, a member of the KESK ( Kamu Emekçileri Sendikaları Konfederasyonu the Trade Union Confederation of public sector employees). Relying in particular on Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association), they complain that they were reprimanded in May 2004 for putting up trade union posters on their office walls, rather than on the notice board specially reserved for trade union use.. As a result of the reprimand deductions were made from their salaries. Bah v. the United Kingdom (no /07) The applicant, Husenatu Bah, is a Sierra Leonean national who lives in London. She arrived in the United Kingdom in 2000 and, having been granted indefinite leave to remain in 2005, was joined by her 13-year old son in Her son was granted leave to remain on the condition that he had no recourse to public funds. Informed by her landlord shortly after her son s arrival that they would have to move out, Ms Bah applied to the borough council for housing. However, the council decided that she did not qualifiy for priority social housing, her son being considered subject to immigration control. Ms Bah complains that that decision violated her rights under Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life). 3
4 Repetitive cases The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court. Agurdino S.R.L. v. Moldova (no. 7359/06) The applicant company complains about the quashing of a final judgment in its favour concerning the payment of value-added tax. It relies on Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). Gotcu and Others v. Romania (nos /03, 21472/04, 44361/05, 472/08, 9421/08 and 18304/08) These cases concern the applicants complaints about the failure to enforce, or the delayed enforcement of, final domestic court judgments in their favour. The applicants rely on Article 6 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). Lipanescu and Others v. Romania (17139/04, 19852/04, 36487/04, 45197/04, 14391/05, 1359/06 and 50718/06) The applicants are Romanian nationals who obtained favourable decisions in various sets of civil proceedings concerning different assets. The cases concern their complaint that those final decisions were set aside on appeal for judicial review lodged by the Principal State Prosecutor of Romania. The applicants rely on Article 6 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). Erciyas v. Turkey (no /05) The case concerns the applicant s complaint about his dismissal from a public bank. Relying on Article 6 1 (right to a fair hearing), he complains of a lack of adversarial process in the related proceedings before the Supreme Administrative Court. Tongün v. Turkey (no. 8622/05) The case concerns the applicants complaint that they were deprived of their property in Gebze to the advantage of the State Treasury without any compensation. They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). Length-of-proceedings cases In the following cases, the applicants complain in particular about the excessive length of non-criminal proceedings. CE.DI.SA Fortore S.N.C. Diagnostica Medica Chirurgica v. Italy (nos. (41107/02 and 22405/03) Tarnowski and Others v. Poland (no /07) Ortuño Ortuño v. Spain (no /07) Thursday 29 September 2011 Flisar v. Slovenia (no. 3127/09) The applicant, Borut Franc Flisar, is a Slovenian national who was born in 1968 and lives in Martjanci (Slovenia). In October 2006 Mr Flisar was involved in an incident during which he allegedly grabbed his half-sister by the neck and slapped her across the face. The police, present at the scene, immediately fined him for violent and aggressive behaviour. Relying on Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial), Mr Flisar complains that his ensuing request for judicial review of that decision was dismissed solely on the basis of the police file and without him being heard by a judge. 4
5 Tretyakov v. Ukraine (no /05) The applicant, Valeriy Tretyakov, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1971 and lives in Kharkiv (Ukraine). In September 2007 he was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily injury on a man by hitting him on the head with a frying pan, and stealing from his apartment, and sentenced to five years and seven months imprisonment. He was immediately released as by that time he had already served the term to which he had been sentenced. He complains about the unlawfulness of his arrest and detention pending trial, as well as the excessive length of his detention before conviction and of the criminal proceedings against him. He further complains that his requests for release pending his trial were not examined. He relies on Article 5 1 (c), 3 and 4 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time). Lastly, under Article 34 (right of individual petition), he alleges that the domestic courts refused to let him photocopy documents from his case file which he wanted to use in support of his application to the Strasbourg Court. Length-of-proceedings cases In the following cases, the applicant complains in particular about the excessive length of non-criminal proceedings. Mianowicz v. Germany (no /04) Späth v. Germany (no. 854/07) Skorokhod v. Ukraine (no /06) This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on its Internet site. To receive the Court s press releases, please subscribe to the Court s RSS feeds. Press contacts echrpress@echr.coe.int tel: Emma Hellyer (tel: ) Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: ) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (tel: ) Nina Salomon (tel: ) Denis Lambert (tel: ) The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. 5
Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following seven Chamber judgments
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 096 (2013) 03.04.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 11 judgments on Tuesday 9 April 2013 and 11 on Thursday
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing
More informationJudgments of 17 May Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria (applications nos /10 and 52340/10)
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 159 (2016) 17.05.2016 Judgments of 17 May 2016 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing ten judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationJudgments of 15 September 2015
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 275 (2015) 15.09.2015 Judgments of 15 September 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 11 judgments 1 : ten Chamber judgments are
More informationJudgments of 16 June 2015
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 201 (2015) 16.06.2015 Judgments of 16 June 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing ten Chamber judgments 1 : seven are summarised
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 368 (2012) 08.10.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 13 judgments on Tuesday 16 October 2012 and nine on
More informationJudgments concerning Austria, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Austria, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom ECHR 244 (2012) 12.06.2012 The
More informationJudgments 1 concerning Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments 1 concerning Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Turkey ECHR 165 (2012) 17.04.2012 The European
More informationJudgments of 31 January 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 045 (2017) 31.01.2017 Judgments of 31 January 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing seven judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are
More informationChamber judgments concerning Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. Karaivanova and Mileva v. Bulgaria (application no /05)
issued by the Registrar of the Court Chamber judgments concerning Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 12 Chamber judgments 1 none
More informationJudgments concerning Croatia, Greece, Monaco, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Croatia, Greece, Monaco, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 16 judgments,
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following nine Chamber judgments 1, none
More informationFirst-time asylum seeker was not given effective remedy under fast-track procedure for examination of his case
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 043 (2012) 02.02.2012 First-time asylum seeker was not given effective remedy under fast-track procedure for examination of his case In today s Chamber judgment
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified
More informationJudgments concerning Germany, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey and Ukraine
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Germany, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey and Ukraine ECHR 222 (2011) 03.11.2011 The
More informationRussian authorities failed to account for air raid killing five people and destroying Chechen village
issued by the Registrar of the Court no. 273 29.03.2011 Russian authorities failed to account for air raid killing five people and destroying Chechen village In today s Chamber judgment in the case Esmukhambetov
More informationJudgments of 7 March 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 078 (2017) 07.03.2017 Judgments of 7 March 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing nine judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 242 (2013) 27.08.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 3 September 2013 and three
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 060 (2014) 04.03.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing six judgments on Tuesday 11 March 2014 and 13 on Thursday
More informationJudgments of 6 September 2016
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 277 (2016) 06.09.2016 Judgments of 6 September 2016 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing seven judgments 1. six Chamber judgments are
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 427 (2012) 21.11.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 22 judgments on Tuesday 27 November 2012. Press releases
More informationJudgments of 22 September Koutsoliontos and Pantazis v. Greece (applications nos /09 and 54590/09)*
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 285 (2015) 22.09.2015 Judgments of 22 September 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing nine Chamber judgments 1, which are summarised
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 113 (2014) 23.04.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing seven judgments on Tuesday 29 April 2014 and three
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 110 (2011) 18.07.2011 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 24 judgments on 26 July 2011. Press releases and texts
More informationExcessive use of police force against 19 year old Roma
issued by the Registrar of the Court no. 155 22.02.2011 Excessive use of police force against 19 year old Roma In today s Chamber judgment in the case Soare and Others v. Romania (application no. 24329/02),
More informationTHIRD SECTION. CASE OF POTCOAVĂ v. ROMANIA. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 December 2013
THIRD SECTION CASE OF POTCOAVĂ v. ROMANIA (Application no. 27945/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 December 2013 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 069 (2013) 06.03.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 12 March 2013 and 13 on Thursday
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS. 27 and 29 October 2009
794 23.10.2009 Press release issued by the Registrar FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS 27 and 29 October 2009 The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 30 Chamber judgments on Tuesday
More informationJudgments concerning Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Turkey ECHR 282 (2012) 03.07.2012 The European Court of Human Rights has
More informationJudgments of 28 November 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 361 (2017) 28.11.2017 Judgments of 28 November 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 28 judgments 1 : seven Chamber judgments are
More informationCases referred to the Grand Chamber
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 382 (2012) 17.10.2012 Cases referred to the Grand Chamber At its last meeting (24 September 2012), the Grand Chamber panel of five judges decided to refer two
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar. Chamber judgment - Opuz v. Turkey
European Court of Human Rights Ref: 455a09 Tel. +33 3 90 21 42 08 Internet: www.echr.coe.int 47 member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 364 (2012) 03.10.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 39 judgments on Tuesday 9 October 2012 and two on Thursday
More informationTHE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES 2017 This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar. Grand Chamber judgment 1. Gäfgen v. Germany (application no /05)
Press release issued by the Registrar Grand Chamber judgment 1 439 01.06.2010 Gäfgen v. Germany (application no. 22978/05) POLICE THREAT TO USE VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILD ABDUCTION SUSPECT AMOUNTED TO ILL-TREATMENT
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 20 July 2017
FIRST SECTION CASE OF HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 50520/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 20 July 2017 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. HOVHANNISYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT
More informationForthcoming judgments and decisions
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 086 (2018) 07.03.2018 Forthcoming judgments and decisions The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing nine judgments on Tuesday 13 March 2018
More informationJudgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF ZAVORIN v. RUSSIA. (Application no /11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 January 2015
FIRST SECTION CASE OF ZAVORIN v. RUSSIA (Application no. 42080/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 January 2015 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. ZAVORIN v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 1
More informationOverview ECHR
Overview 1959-2016 ECHR This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general information about the way the Court
More informationJudgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey ECHR 004 (2012) 10.01.2012 The European
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 19 October 2017
FIRST SECTION CASE OF KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA (Application no. 55133/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 October 2017 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT
More informationDetention for 27 days in personal space of less than 3 square metres was inhuman and degrading treatment
issued by the Registrar of the Court Detention for 27 days in personal space of less than 3 square metres was inhuman and degrading treatment In today s Grand Chamber judgment 1 in the case of Muršić v.
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 273 31.3.2009 Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgments concerning Finland, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Turkey The European Court
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar. Chamber judgment 1. Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia (application no /04)
005 07.01.2010 Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgment 1 Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia (application no. 25965/04) CYPRIOT AND RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES FAILED TO PROTECT 20-YEAR OLD RUSSIAN CABARET
More informationOverview ECHR
Overview 1959-2017 ECHR This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general information about the way the Court
More informationJudgments of 21 November 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 351 (2017) 21.11.2017 Judgments of 21 November 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 15 judgments 1 : 11 Chamber judgments are
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF GURBAN v. TURKEY. (Application no. 4947/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 December 2015
SECOND SECTION CASE OF GURBAN v. TURKEY (Application no. 4947/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 December 2015 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /10 Dmitriy Vitalyevich ZUYEV against Russia lodged on 5 March 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 21302/10 Dmitriy Vitalyevich ZUYEV against Russia lodged on 5 March 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Dmitriy Vitalyevich Zuyev, is a Ukrainian national who was born
More informationForthcoming judgments and decisions
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 314 (2017) 26.10.2017 Forthcoming judgments and decisions The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing nine judgments on Tuesday 31 October
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar. CHAMBER JUDGMENT FREROT v. FRANCE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 406 12.6.2007 Press release issued by the Registrar CHAMBER JUDGMENT FREROT v. FRANCE The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF ŠEBALJ v. CROATIA. (Application no. 4429/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 28 June 2011
FIRST SECTION CASE OF ŠEBALJ v. CROATIA (Application no. 4429/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 June 2011 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may
More informationTHIRD SECTION DECISION
THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 37204/02 Ludmila Yakovlevna GUSAR against the Republic of Moldova and Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 30 April 2013 as a Chamber
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION CASE OF Y.F. v. TURKEY (Application no. 24209/94) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2003
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 297 (2013) 16.10.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 19 judgments on Tuesday 22 October 2013 and 16 on Thursday
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF AHMET DURAN v. TURKEY. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 28 August 2012 FINAL 28/11/2012
SECOND SECTION CASE OF AHMET DURAN v. TURKEY (Application no. 37552/06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 August 2012 FINAL 28/11/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 205 (2013) 11.07.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 20 judgments on Tuesday 16 July 2013 and ten on Thursday
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 302 (2014) 23.10.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 28 October 2014 and nine on
More informationMAIN COMMUNICATION LETTER REFERENCE
COUNTRY DATE OF PO MAIN COMMUNICATION LETTER REFERENCE Albania Andorra Armenia 14/09/15 I 2015-1420 Nothing to disclose. Austria 30/09/15 I 2015-1530 Nothing to disclose since contribution in 2006. - Reply
More informationYour questions about: the Court of Justice of the European Union. the EFTA Court. the European Court of Human Rights
Your questions about: the Court of Justice of the European Union the EFTA Court the European Court of Human Rights the International Court of Justice the International Criminal Court CJEU COURT OF JUSTICE
More informationJudgments of 8 November
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 354 (2016) 08.11.2016 Judgments of 8 November The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 20 judgments 1 : seven Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationFIFTH SECTION. CASE OF IGOR SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE. (Application no /04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 12 January 2012 FINAL 04/06/2012
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF IGOR SHEVCHENKO v. UKRAINE (Application no. 22737/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 12 January 2012 FINAL 04/06/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 (c) of the Convention.
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /10. against Russia lodged on 7 August 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 48741/10 by Aleksandr Nikolayevich MILOVANOV against Russia lodged on 7 August 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Nikolayevich Milovanov, is a Russian
More informationJudgments of 17 July SA Patronale hypothécaire v. Belgium (application no /09)*
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 258 (2018) 17.07.2018 Judgments of 17 July 2018 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 16 judgments 1 : nine Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationSOUTH Human Rights Violations: Kim Sam-sok and Kim Un-ju
SOUTH KOREA @Recent Human Rights Violations: Kim Sam-sok and Kim Un-ju Amnesty International is calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Kim Sam-sok, sentenced to seven years' imprisonment
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 287 (2013) 09.10.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 13 judgments on Tuesday 15 October 2013 and 12 on Thursday
More informationChapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty
in cooperation with the Chapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty Facilitator s Guide Learning objectives I To familiarize the participants with some
More informationTHIRD SECTION DECISION
THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 37187/03 and 18577/08 Iaroslav SARUPICI against the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine and Anatolie GANEA and Aurelia GHERSCOVICI against the Republic of Moldova The
More informationFOURTH SECTION. CASE OF ROMANESCU v. ROMANIA. (Application no /11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 16 May 2017
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF ROMANESCU v. ROMANIA (Application no. 78375/11) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 16 May 2017 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It
More informationFIFTH SECTION. CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /99)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA (Application no. 51562/99) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 November 2006 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF KAROUSSIOTIS v. PORTUGAL. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT [Extracts] STRASBOURG. 1 February 2011 FINAL 01/05/2011
SECOND SECTION CASE OF KAROUSSIOTIS v. PORTUGAL (Application no. 23205/08) JUDGMENT [Extracts] STRASBOURG 1 February 2011 FINAL 01/05/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationHuman Rights in Europe
Human Rights in Europe Legal Bulletin Issue 40 Apri 2003 AIRE Centre London Editors: Nuala Mole Biljana Braithwaite Printout (Serbian/Bosnian/Croatian):7600 Printout (Albanian):1200 Printout (Polish):600
More informationCCPR/C/104/D/1606/2007
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr.: General 3 May 2012 Original: English Human Rights Committee Communication No. 1606/2007 Decision adopted by the Committee at
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 51098/07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 Communicated on 9 July 2014 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Gennadiy Nikolayevich Kurkin,
More informationJurisdiction: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Court (Third Section)
Case Summary Eremia and Others v The Republic of Moldova Application Number: 3564/11 1. Reference Details Jurisdiction: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Court (Third Section) Date of Decision: 28
More informationEuropean Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers
European Court of Human Rights Questions & Answers Questions & Answers What is the European Court of Human Rights? These questions and answers have been prepared by the Registry of the Court. The document
More informationUse of gas against terrorists during the Moscow theatre siege was justified, but the rescue operation afterwards was poorly planned and implemented
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 295 (2011) 20.12.2011 Use of gas against terrorists during the Moscow theatre siege was justified, but the rescue operation afterwards was poorly planned and implemented
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 343 (2013) 28.11.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing six judgments on Tuesday 3 December 2013 and 16 on
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar. CHAMBER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 373 15.7.2002 Press release issued by the Registrar CHAMBER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing
More information14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 November 2016 (OR. en) 14328/16 COPEN 333 EUROJUST 144 EJN 70 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 6069/2/15 REV 2 Subject:
More informationFOURTH SECTION. CASE OF BĂLȘAN v. ROMANIA. (Application no /09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 23 May 2017
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BĂLȘAN v. ROMANIA (Application no. 49645/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 May 2017 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may
More informationFight against impunity in Ukraine
FIDH, Center for Civil Liberties, Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group, Advocacy Advisory Panel Joint situation note Fight against impunity in Ukraine November 2015 FIDH, in partnership with its Ukrainian
More informationJudgments of 11 October 2016
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 322 (2016) 11.10.2016 Judgments of 11 October 2016 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 28 judgments 1 : nine Chamber judgments are
More informationFOURTH SECTION. CASE OF GISZCZAK v. POLAND. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 29 November 2011 FINAL 29/02/2012
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF GISZCZAK v. POLAND (Application no. 40195/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 November 2011 FINAL 29/02/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be
More informationTHIRD SECTION. CASE OF U.N. v. RUSSIA. (Application no /15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 26 July 2016
THIRD SECTION CASE OF U.N. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 14348/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 July 2016 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be
More informationEXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
EXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Clause PART I PRELIMINARY 16. Proceedings after arrest 1. Short title 17. Search and seizure 2. Interpretation Sub-Part C Eligibility
More informationLEGAL RIGHTS - CRIMINAL - Right Against Self-Incrimination
IV. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ICCPR United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, ICCPR, A/50/40 vol. I (1995) 72 at paras. 424 and 432. Paragraph 424 It is noted with concern that the provisions
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS SECOND SECTION PANTEA v. ROMANIA (Application no. 33343/96) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 3 June 2003 FINAL
More informationTHIRD SECTION. CASE OF TONIOLO v. SAN MARINO AND ITALY. (Application no /10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 26 June 2012
THIRD SECTION CASE OF TONIOLO v. SAN MARINO AND ITALY (Application no. 44853/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 June 2012 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar HEARINGS IN JUNE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 418 09.06.2008 Press release issued by the Registrar HEARINGS IN JUNE The European Court of Human Rights will be holding the following six hearings in June 2008: Wednesday
More information30/ Human rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Limited 29 September 2015 A/HRC/30/L.16 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirtieth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 001 (2014) 02.01.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 7 January 2014 and 20 on Thursday
More informationFIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 16472/04 by Ruslan Anatoliyovych ULYANOV against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 5 October 2010
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE Title 28 EXPUNGEMENT CODE
TABLE OF CONTENTS SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBAL CODE Title 28 EXPUNGEMENT CODE Section Page Number 28-1-101. Legislative declaration.... 2 28-1-102. Definitions... 2 28-1-103. Expungement procedure.... 2
More informationCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Distr.: Restricted * 28 April 2011 Original: English Human Rights Committee One hundredth and first session 14
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF LAMANNA v. AUSTRIA. (Application no /95) JUDGMENT
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF LAMANNA v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 28923/95) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 10 July
More informationSECOND SECTION DECISION
SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 45073/07 by Aurelijus BERŽINIS against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 13 December 2011 as a Committee composed of: Dragoljub
More informationTHE FACTS ... A. The circumstances of the case. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
... THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Kalid Husain, is a Yemeni national who was born in 1936 and is currently detained in Parma Prison. He was represented before the Court by Mr G. Pagano, of the Genoa Bar.
More informationFOURTH SECTION DECISION
FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 498/10 Piotr CIOK against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23 October 2012 as a Chamber composed of: Päivi Hirvelä, President,
More information