Forthcoming judgments
|
|
- Ashlynn Wilcox
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 287 (2013) Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 13 judgments on Tuesday 15 October 2013 and 12 on Thursday 17 October Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 10 a.m. (local time) on the Court s Internet site ( Tuesday 15 October 2013 Gutsanovi v. Bulgaria (application no /10) The applicants, Borislav Gutsanov, his wife Monika Gutsanova and their minor daughters, S. Gutsanova and B. Gutsanova, are Bulgarian nationals who were born in 1967, 1972, 2002 and 2004 respectively and live in Varna. The case concerns a police operation conducted at the home of Mr Gutsanov, an influential politician, during which he was arrested and his home was searched. He was a member of the National Assembly representing the Socialist Party, a member of the party s central executive bureau and vice-president of its regional branch. At the time of the events he was also chairman of Varna municipal council. On 30 October 2009, the Sofia city public prosecutor s office opened criminal proceedings against a person or persons unknown for abuse of office by a civil servant and misappropriation of public funds resulting in significant damage to the Varna municipal public transport company. In the course of the investigation a team of police officers entered the Gustanov family home on 31 March 2010 at around 6.30 a.m., arrested Mr Gustanov and searched the premises. Relying on Articles 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 2 (right to be presumed innocent), 8 (right to respect for private and family life and for the home) and 13 (right to an effective remedy), Mr Gutsanov and the members of his family complain of several breaches of their rights. Casacchia and Others v. Italy (nos /07, 24941/07 and 25724/07) Natale and Others v. Italy (no /07) These two cases concern legislative amendments which affected pending civil proceedings that the applicants, retired employees of the Banco Di Napoli, had brought concerning their pension adjustments following the privatisation of public banks (such as the Banco Di Napoli) in The applicants in the first case are 15 Italian nationals who were born between 1922 and 1974 and live in Isernia, Bisceglie, Lecce, Maglie, Turin, Reggio Calabria, Foggia, Rome, Naples, Scafati, and Pompei (Italy). The applicants in the second case are 16 Italian nationals who were born between 1913 and 1969 and live in Bologne, Fano, Casalecchio di Reno, Rastignano di Pianoro, Montererenzio, and Pianoro (Italy). Relying in particular on Article 6 1 (right to a fair hearing), the applicants allege that the amendments amounted to legislative interference with their pending disputes before the Italian courts which did not respect the principle of equality of arms. They also rely on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).
2 Segheti v. the Republic of Moldova (no /07) The applicant, Ionel Segheti, is a Romanian national who was born in 1960 and lives in Cricova (the Republic of Moldova). The case concerns Mr Segheti s complaint about inhuman conditions of detention in prisons in Chişinău and Cricova following his arrest in April 2005 on suspicion of making false accusations. He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to eight years imprisonment. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), he notably alleges poor sanitary conditions, with vermin in his cell as well as a foul-smelling toilet, and poor quantity and quality of food. Timus and Tarus v. the Republic of Moldova (no /11) The applicants, Serghei Timus and Victoria Tarus, are Moldovan nationals who were born in 1990 and 1989 respectively and live in Chişinău. The case concerns the killing of the applicants brother, Alexei Vlasi, on 14 March 2009 during a police operation at an apartment block to arrest a suspect of armed robbery. According to the police officers involved, they thought Alexei Vlasi was the suspect they were after and, when trying to apprehend him, one of the officers was stabbed by him and shot him in self-defense. The applicants allege that their brother, who was not armed, was beaten by police officers and then shot in the back of his head at close-range. Relying on Article 2 (right to life), Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), the applicants complain about the police ill-treating and killing their brother and that the authorities ensuing investigation into his death was ineffective. Plechanow v. Poland (no /04) Just satisfaction The applicants, Jerzy Plechanow, Ariadna Plechanow and Andrzej Plechanow, are Polish nationals who were born respectively in 1953, 1924 and 1955 and live in Warsaw. Relying mainly on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), they alleged that the decisions dismissing their claims for compensation with regard to the expropriation of their property had been unfair. In its judgment on the merits of 7 July 2009 the Court held that the applicants, who had been adversely affected by national administrative reforms, the inconsistency of the domestic law and case-law and the lack of legal certainty, had been unable to secure adequate compensation for the damage they had sustained. The Court held that the question of the application of Article 41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision. It will address this issue in its judgment of 15 October Ali v. Romania (no /09) The applicant, Ahmad Ali, is a Syrian national who was born in The case concerns Mr Ali s complaint about the conditions of his detention in Jilava Prison where he was transferred in December 2008 to serve a 13-year prison sentence for drug trafficking. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), he complains in particular of overcrowding and poor hygiene in the cells in which he was detained. He also complains under the same article about the conditions in which he was transferred to Jilava Prison, alleging that he was deprived of water and food and not told why he was being transferred or where. Şandru v. Romania (no /05) The applicant, Alexandru Şandru, is a Romanian national who was born in 1985 and lives in Râmnicu Vâlcea (Romania). The case concerns his trial for rape in 2006, and his pre-trial detention. On 8 April 2005 he was arrested and detained. He was held in pre-trial detention until 31 March 2006, when he was convicted and sentenced to 2 years and 6 months imprisonment. Mr Şandru appealed both the conviction and the sentence. However, the prosecutor and victim also appealed the sentence, and in September 2006 an appeal court upheld the conviction, while increasing the sentence to seven years imprisonment. Mr Şandru relies on Article 5 3 (right to liberty and security) to complain that 2
3 he was held in pre-trial detention for an excessively long period. He also relies on Article 5 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) to complain that, when the Romanian courts periodically reviewed his pre-trial detention in July and August 2005 he was not legally represented, and on other such occasions he was not brought before the court. Finally, he relies on Article 6 (right to a fair trial and right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses), to complain that his trial, sentence and subsequent appeals were unfair since he was not provided with an opportunity to question the victim. Hüseyin Kaplan v. Turkey (no /08) The applicant, Hüseyin Kaplan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1959 and lives in Istanbul. The case concerns the death of his son, Şenal Kaplan, who was born on 18 September 1986 and died on 19 September 2006 while performing his compulsory military service. While he was on guard duty at a gendarmerie station in Bayır (Diyarbakır-Kulp), Şenal Kaplan was found with serious firearms injuries. He was taken immediately by helicopter to hospital, where he died. Mr Kaplan contends that his son was killed since, in his view, he would have had no reason to commit suicide. Relying on Article 2 (right to life), Mr Kaplan maintains that the exact circumstances of his son s death were not properly elucidated owing to the lack of an independent and impartial criminal investigation. İbrahim Güler v. Turkey (no. 1942/08) The applicant, İbrahim Güler, is a Turkish national who was born in 1973 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Diyarbakır (Turkey). The case concerns the criminal proceedings brought against Mr Güler for attempting to undermine the constitutional order of the state and his pre-trial detention. On 5 November 1996 Mr Güler was taken into police custody, during an operation against Hizbullah. In the absence of a lawyer, he was questioned about his relationship and activities with the organisation. Mr Güler accepted the allegations made against him, and he was ordered into pretrial detention. He later retracted his statement, claiming that he had been tortured and threatened while in police custody. In March 2005 he was convicted, and this was upheld on final appeal in January Mr Güler relies on Article 5 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 (right to a fair trial) to complain that both his pre-trial detention and the proceedings as a whole were excessively long, and that he was denied access to a lawyer when being questioned by the police. Mehmet Hatip Dicle v. Turkey (no. 9858/04) The applicant, Mehmet Hatip Dicle, is a Turkish national who was born in 1955 and lives in Diyarbakır. He was convicted in criminal proceedings for writing and publishing an article in which he criticised government policy in the town of Dersim, denouncing the economic situation and the growth of drug trafficking. He also claimed that the Kurds in the region had been victims of a policy of assimilation and genocide. Relying on Articles 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and 10 (freedom of expression), Mr Dicle complains that his right to freedom of thought and expression was infringed. Under Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), he alleges that his political views were the decisive factor in his criminal conviction. Yılmaz Demir v. Turkey (no /06) The applicant, Yılmaz Demir, is a Turkish national who was born in 1980 and lives in Diyarbakır. The case concerns his lack of access to a lawyer while in police custody. Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair trial), Mr Demir complains that the criminal courts took into consideration the confession improperly obtained from him while he was in police custody without access to a lawyer. The applicant was arrested in June 2001 in the course of an anti-terrorist operation and was taken into police custody on suspicion of abduction and unlawful imprisonment. He admitted having been involved in the abduction and gave the address of the premises of the illegal organisation AMED, a branch of the PKK. When questioned subsequently by the public prosecutor he admitted his involvement in the unlawful imprisonment but denied being a member of the PKK. He claimed that 3
4 while in police custody he had been subjected to electric shocks to force him to confess to membership of the PKK. Finally, when he was brought before the judge, he again admitted the charges. He was not assisted by a lawyer either while in police custody or before the judge or prosecutor. Repetitive case The following case raises issues which have already been submitted to the Court. Sekulić and Kučević v. Serbia (nos /06 and 50135/06) These cases concern the applicants complaints about non-enforcement of judgments given in their favour against socially-owned companies. The applicants rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Article 6 1 (right to a fair hearing / access to court) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). Thursday 17 October 2013 Horvatić v. Croatia (no /09) The applicant, Mijo Horvatić, is a Croatian national who was born in 1941 and lives in Garešnica (Croatia). The case concerns Mr Horvatić s complaint about the unfairness of criminal proceedings brought against him in 1996 on charges of armed robbery. He was subsequently found guilty on the basis of fibres taken from his clothes during his police questioning as well as strands of his hair being found on the disguise allegedly used by the bank robber. He was sentenced to five years imprisonment. Relying on Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial), he complains that the evidence against him had been tampered with by the police, alleging in particular that the police had rubbed together the robber s disguise and his clothes and planted the hair, and that he had no effective opportunity to challenge that evidence during the trial. Budrevich v. the Czech Republic (no /10) The applicant, Andrei Budrevich, is a Belarusian national who was born in The case concerns Mr Budrevich s removal to Belarus. In 2006 he left Belarus and entered the Czech Republic, where he applied for asylum, stating that he feared imprisonment in Belarus because he had imported advertisements in support of an opposition candidate in the presidential elections. His request was rejected as the authorities considered his allegations contradictory and not credible. Three subsequent requests for asylum were also rejected. Following his conviction of a number of offences, a court sentenced him to expulsion from the territory of the Czech Republic in March However, the execution of the sentence was stayed in accordance with an interim measure applied by the European Court of Human Rights (under Rule 39 of its Rules of Court) in November 2010, indicating to the Czech Government not to remove Mr Budrevich to Belarus until further notice. In 2011, the Czech authorities granted Mr Budrevich subsidiary protection under the Asylum Act, which was extended in Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), he complains that his removal to Belarus would expose him to a real risk of ill-treatment and that he did not have an effective remedy in Czech Republic against his removal. Winterstein and Others v. France (no /07) The applicants are 25 French nationals, applying on their own behalf and on behalf of their underage children, and the association ATD Quart Monde. The case concerns the eviction proceedings brought against a number of traveller families. Relying in particular on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), 4
5 the applicants allege that their rights were infringed by the order for their eviction from the land they were occupying in the municipality of Herblay. The families had been living for several years in the same place and some of them had been born there. They belonged to a group of 95 people who had settled on private land which was intended for camping and caravanning and which, according to the land-use plan, was located in a protected natural area. The municipal authorities brought eviction proceedings against the families and the domestic courts issued orders for their forcible eviction. Although the orders were not enforced, a large number of families left the site, fearing that they would be. Only four families were rehoused in social housing; the family sites on which the others were meant to be accommodated were not provided. Aslanis v. Greece (no /10) The applicant, Georgios Aslanis, is a Greek national. The case concerns his conditions of detention at Serres police headquarters. Mr Aslanis was arrested in June 2009 on suspicion of committing several thefts and was charged with a series of thefts carried out as part of a gang. After a brief period of release on bail, which he failed to pay, he was again remanded in custody. From December 2009 to March 2010 he was held at Serres police headquarters. Mr Aslanis complains that a lack of ventilation made the air impossible to breathe owing to the unpleasant smells and cigarette smoke. He further complains of the dirty state of the toilets, overcrowding and a shortage of beds and food. He alleges that the conditions of detention were in breach of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment). Shyti v. Greece (no /09) The applicant, Petrit Shyti, is an Albanian national who was born in Following Mr Shyti s arrest in February 2009 for cocaine trafficking the public prosecutor at the Thessaloniki Criminal Court instituted criminal proceedings against him for drug trafficking and possession of forged transport papers. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), Mr Shyti complains of his conditions of detention at Thessaloniki police headquarters, claiming that his cell was inadequately ventilated and lit. Under Article 5 4 (right to a speedy review of the lawfulness of detention), he argues, in particular, that the examination of his application for release did not comply with the speediness requirement. Keller v. Russia (no /04) The applicant, Galina Keller, is a Russian national who was born in 1937 and lives in Moscow. The case concerns the death of her son, born in 1977, while detained in police custody in September 2000 on suspicion of having stolen a bicycle. The ensuing investigation concluded that he had jumped from a window into the courtyard of the police station and that there had been no coercion. Relying on Article 2 (right to life), Ms Keller complains that the authorities failed to safeguard the life of her son and that there was no effective investigation into the circumstances of his death. She also complains, under Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), that her son had been ill-treated before his death, as bruises were found on his body, and that the investigation was unable to explain the origins of those injuries. Finally, Ms Keller alleges that her son s detention in police custody was unlawful, in breach of Article 5 1 (c) (right to liberty and security). Klyukin v. Russia (no /07) The applicant, Aleksandr Klyukin, is a Russian national who was born in 1961 and lives in Moscow. He was convicted of burglary and sentenced to five-and-a-half years imprisonment in a judgment which became final in May He alleges that the conditions of his detention in a remand prison in Moscow between April 2006 and June 2007 and of his detention in two correctional colonies from June 2007 until his release in November 2009 were in breach of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment). In particular, he complains of: severely overcrowded cells, a lack of ventilation and insufficient outdoor exercise in the remand prison; and, insufficient personal space, scarcity and 5
6 low quality of the food provided in the correctional colony. He further maintains that he did not have an effective remedy in respect of his complaints, in breach of Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). Sergey Vasilyev v. Russia (no /07) The applicant, Sergey Vasilyev, is a Russian national who was born in 1976 and is serving a ten-year prison sentence in Yemva, Komi Republic (Russia), for murder. The case concerns Mr Vasilyev s complaint about the appalling conditions of his pre-trial detention, notably in remand prison no. IZ-44/l, from October 2005 (when he was arrested) to April 2007 (just after his conviction was upheld on appeal). He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of torture and of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), notably alleging severe overcrowding and a lack of effective remedies under domestic law to complain about the conditions of his detention. He also complains under Article 5 3 (right to liberty and security) about the excessive length of his detention while the criminal proceedings against him were still pending, and under Article 34 (right of individual petition) about the failure of the correctional colony, where he served part of his prison sentence, to dispatch his application form to the European Court of Human Rights. Vladimir Belyayev v. Russia (no. 9967/06) The applicant, Vladimir Belyayev, is a Russian national who was born in 1968 and is serving a 21-year prison sentence in the Sverdlovsk region (Russia) for murder and membership of an organised criminal gang. He was convicted in November The case concerns the conditions of Mr Belyayev s detention between April and December 2005 whilst serving part of his sentence in correctional colony IK-4 in the Magadan region. Relying on Article 3 of the Convention (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), he complains that he was kept in overcrowded cells with little opportunity for outside exercise. Pozhyvotko v. Ukraine (no /08) The applicants, Nataliya Pozhyvotko and Mariya Pozhyvotko are Ukrainian nationals who live in the Chernihiv region (Ukraine). They are the widow and mother of Volodymr Pozhyvotko, respectively. The case concerns the investigation by the Ukrainian authorities into Mr Pozhyvotko s death on 12 October 2004 when he was shot dead in a local bar. Over the next seven years, investigators decided to close an investigation into the incident three times, on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to charge the main suspect, or that the suspect had acted in self-defense. Each time the investigation was closed, it was re-opened by a supervisory authority. Investigations were still ongoing as of 12 April Relying on Article 2 (right to life), Nataliya and Mariya Pozhyvotko complain that the Ukrainian authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into the death of their husband and son. Taran v. Ukraine (no /06) The applicant, Ivan Taran, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1980 and lives in Sevastopol (Ukraine). The case concerns a number of complaints brought by Mr Taran about the conditions and lawfulness of his pre-trial detention following his arrest in June 2005 on suspicion of murder. The Ukrainian courts found him guilty in November 2010 and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment. That decision was, however, subsequently quashed on appeal and in April 2011 Mr Taran was released. On 4 December 2012, the proceedings were still pending. Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), he complains about the conditions of his transportation between Simferopol detention facility and Sevastopol temporary detention centre where he was taken on numerous occasions to attend court hearings on his case, alleging that he was kept for over 20 hours in a 0.5 sq.m metal cage inside the vehicle without food, water or being able to sleep. He further alleges overcrowding in Sevastopol temporary detention centre. Further relying on Article 5 (right to liberty and security), he also complains about: the lawfulness of his 6
7 pre-trial detention between August and October 2005 which he alleges was not based on a court decision as well as of the courts extension of his pre-trial detention (Article 5 1); the unreasonable length of his pre-trial detention, which lasted more than five years and nine months (Article 5 3); the lack of appropriate judicial review of his detention (Article 5 4); and, the absence of an enforceable right to compensation for his unlawful pre-trial detention (Article 5 5). Lastly, he alleges that the length of the criminal proceedings brought against him was excessive, in breach of Article 6 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time). Zubkova v. Ukraine (no /08) The applicant, Nina Zubkova, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1937 and lives in the city of Kharkiv (Ukraine). The case concerns Ms Zubkova s complaint about the authorities inadequate investigation into the death of her son, Igor Zubkov (born in 1961), on 18 May 2002 when, riding his bicycle, he collided with a minibus at a crossroads in Kharkiv. She notably complains that the investigation was discontinued and re-opened on numerous occasions between 2002 and 2006 without instructions by the supervising authorities for further steps, namely questioning of witnesses, expert examinations and a reconstruction of events, being followed through. During the proceedings, the investigators continued to conclude that the accident had been caused by her son and not through any fault of the minibus driver. She relies on Article 2 (right to life). This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on To receive the Court s press releases, please subscribe here: or follow us on Press contacts echrpress@echr.coe.int tel: Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: ) Nina Salomon (tel: ) Denis Lambert (tel: ) Jean Conte (tel: ) The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. 7
Forthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 096 (2013) 03.04.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 11 judgments on Tuesday 9 April 2013 and 11 on Thursday
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Italy, Latvia, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Slovakia, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing
More informationChamber judgments concerning Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey. Karaivanova and Mileva v. Bulgaria (application no /05)
issued by the Registrar of the Court Chamber judgments concerning Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 12 Chamber judgments 1 none
More informationJudgments of 16 June 2015
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 201 (2015) 16.06.2015 Judgments of 16 June 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing ten Chamber judgments 1 : seven are summarised
More informationJudgments concerning Croatia, Greece, Monaco, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Croatia, Greece, Monaco, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 16 judgments,
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 060 (2014) 04.03.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing six judgments on Tuesday 11 March 2014 and 13 on Thursday
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following nine Chamber judgments 1, none
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Malta, the Republic of Moldova, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 242 (2013) 27.08.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 3 September 2013 and three
More informationJudgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following seven Chamber judgments
More informationJudgments of 6 September 2016
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 277 (2016) 06.09.2016 Judgments of 6 September 2016 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing seven judgments 1. six Chamber judgments are
More informationJudgments of 31 January 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 045 (2017) 31.01.2017 Judgments of 31 January 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing seven judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are
More informationJudgments of 15 September 2015
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 275 (2015) 15.09.2015 Judgments of 15 September 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 11 judgments 1 : ten Chamber judgments are
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 368 (2012) 08.10.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 13 judgments on Tuesday 16 October 2012 and nine on
More informationJudgments of 17 May Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria (applications nos /10 and 52340/10)
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 159 (2016) 17.05.2016 Judgments of 17 May 2016 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing ten judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationJudgments concerning Austria, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Austria, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom ECHR 244 (2012) 12.06.2012 The
More informationJudgments of 22 September Koutsoliontos and Pantazis v. Greece (applications nos /09 and 54590/09)*
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 285 (2015) 22.09.2015 Judgments of 22 September 2015 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing nine Chamber judgments 1, which are summarised
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 113 (2014) 23.04.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing seven judgments on Tuesday 29 April 2014 and three
More informationJudgments of 7 March 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 078 (2017) 07.03.2017 Judgments of 7 March 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing nine judgments 1 : six Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationJudgments concerning Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Austria, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Portugal, Russia and Turkey ECHR 282 (2012) 03.07.2012 The European Court of Human Rights has
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 364 (2012) 03.10.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 39 judgments on Tuesday 9 October 2012 and two on Thursday
More informationJudgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, and Turkey The European Court of Human Rights has today
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /10. against Russia lodged on 7 August 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 48741/10 by Aleksandr Nikolayevich MILOVANOV against Russia lodged on 7 August 2010 STATEMENT OF FACTS THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Aleksandr Nikolayevich Milovanov, is a Russian
More informationFirst-time asylum seeker was not given effective remedy under fast-track procedure for examination of his case
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 043 (2012) 02.02.2012 First-time asylum seeker was not given effective remedy under fast-track procedure for examination of his case In today s Chamber judgment
More informationJudgments 1 concerning Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments 1 concerning Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, the Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania and Turkey ECHR 165 (2012) 17.04.2012 The European
More informationChapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty
in cooperation with the Chapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty Facilitator s Guide Learning objectives I To familiarize the participants with some
More informationJudgments of 17 July SA Patronale hypothécaire v. Belgium (application no /09)*
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 258 (2018) 17.07.2018 Judgments of 17 July 2018 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 16 judgments 1 : nine Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 427 (2012) 21.11.2012 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 22 judgments on Tuesday 27 November 2012. Press releases
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 069 (2013) 06.03.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 12 March 2013 and 13 on Thursday
More informationDecision adopted by the Committee at its fifty-second session, 28 April 23 May Sergei Kirsanov (not represented by counsel)
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 19 June 2014 CAT/C/52/D/478/2011 Original: English Committee against Torture Communication
More informationForthcoming judgments and decisions
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 086 (2018) 07.03.2018 Forthcoming judgments and decisions The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing nine judgments on Tuesday 13 March 2018
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 149 (2011) 19.09.2011 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 22 judgments on Tuesday 27 September 2011 and five
More informationJudgments concerning Germany, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey and Ukraine
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Germany, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Turkey and Ukraine ECHR 222 (2011) 03.11.2011 The
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 205 (2013) 11.07.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 20 judgments on Tuesday 16 July 2013 and ten on Thursday
More informationEuropean Court of Human Rights. Questions & Answers
European Court of Human Rights Questions & Answers Questions & Answers What is the European Court of Human Rights? These questions and answers have been prepared by the Registry of the Court. The document
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF AHMET DURAN v. TURKEY. (Application no /06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 28 August 2012 FINAL 28/11/2012
SECOND SECTION CASE OF AHMET DURAN v. TURKEY (Application no. 37552/06) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 August 2012 FINAL 28/11/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be
More informationJudgments of 28 November 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 361 (2017) 28.11.2017 Judgments of 28 November 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 28 judgments 1 : seven Chamber judgments are
More informationJudgments of 21 November 2017
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 351 (2017) 21.11.2017 Judgments of 21 November 2017 The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 15 judgments 1 : 11 Chamber judgments are
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF ŠEBALJ v. CROATIA. (Application no. 4429/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 28 June 2011
FIRST SECTION CASE OF ŠEBALJ v. CROATIA (Application no. 4429/09) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 June 2011 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may
More informationJudgments of 8 November
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 354 (2016) 08.11.2016 Judgments of 8 November The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing 20 judgments 1 : seven Chamber judgments are summarised
More informationTHIRD SECTION DECISION
THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 37187/03 and 18577/08 Iaroslav SARUPICI against the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine and Anatolie GANEA and Aurelia GHERSCOVICI against the Republic of Moldova The
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS. 27 and 29 October 2009
794 23.10.2009 Press release issued by the Registrar FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS 27 and 29 October 2009 The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 30 Chamber judgments on Tuesday
More informationDetention for 27 days in personal space of less than 3 square metres was inhuman and degrading treatment
issued by the Registrar of the Court Detention for 27 days in personal space of less than 3 square metres was inhuman and degrading treatment In today s Grand Chamber judgment 1 in the case of Muršić v.
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 110 (2011) 18.07.2011 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 24 judgments on 26 July 2011. Press releases and texts
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar. Chamber judgment - Opuz v. Turkey
European Court of Human Rights Ref: 455a09 Tel. +33 3 90 21 42 08 Internet: www.echr.coe.int 47 member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia
More informationCCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights CCPR/C/101/D/1517/2006 Distr.: Restricted * 28 April 2011 Original: English Human Rights Committee One hundredth and first session 14
More informationCases referred to the Grand Chamber
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 382 (2012) 17.10.2012 Cases referred to the Grand Chamber At its last meeting (24 September 2012), the Grand Chamber panel of five judges decided to refer two
More informationCCPR/C/104/D/1606/2007
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr.: General 3 May 2012 Original: English Human Rights Committee Communication No. 1606/2007 Decision adopted by the Committee at
More informationDocument references: Prior decisions - Special Rapporteur s rule 91 decision, dated 28 December 1992 (not issued in document form)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Kulomin v. Hungary Communication No. 521/1992 16 March 1994 CCPR/C/50/D/521/1992 * ADMISSIBILITY Submitted by: Vladimir Kulomin Alleged victim: The author State party: Hungary Date
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment DECISION. Communication No. 281/2005
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr. RESTRICTED * CAT/C/38/D/281/2005 ** 5 June 2007 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar HEARINGS IN JUNE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 418 09.06.2008 Press release issued by the Registrar HEARINGS IN JUNE The European Court of Human Rights will be holding the following six hearings in June 2008: Wednesday
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 51098/07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 Communicated on 9 July 2014 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Gennadiy Nikolayevich Kurkin,
More informationOVERCROWDING OF PRISON POPULATIONS: THE NEPALESE PERSPECTIVE
OVERCROWDING OF PRISON POPULATIONS: THE NEPALESE PERSPECTIVE Mahendra Nath Upadhyaya* I. INTRODUCTION Overcrowding of prisons is a common problem of so many countries, developing and developed. It is not
More informationList of issues prior to submission of the sixth periodic report of the Czech Republic due in 2016*
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 11 June 2014 Original: English CAT/C/CZE/QPR/6 Committee against Torture List of
More informationJudgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey
issued by the Registrar of the Court Judgments concerning Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia and Turkey ECHR 004 (2012) 10.01.2012 The European
More informationDecision adopted by the Committee under article 22 of the Convention, concerning communication No. 685/2015*, ** Judith Pieters)
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CAT/C/62/D/685/2015 Distr.: General 9 January 2018 Original: English Committee against Torture Decision
More informationConcluding observations on the third periodic report of Belgium*
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 3 January 2014 English Original: French CAT/C/BEL/CO/3 Committee against Torture
More informationTHE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES 2017 This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 273 31.3.2009 Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgments concerning Finland, Hungary, Moldova, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Turkey The European Court
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar. CHAMBER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 373 15.7.2002 Press release issued by the Registrar CHAMBER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing
More informationUniversal Periodic Review Submission Bulgaria September 2014
Universal Periodic Review Submission Bulgaria September 2014 Summary This submission highlights concerns about Bulgaria s compliance with its international human rights obligations. It focuses on the treatment
More informationForthcoming judgments and decisions
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 314 (2017) 26.10.2017 Forthcoming judgments and decisions The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing nine judgments on Tuesday 31 October
More informationEuropean Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)
Strasbourg, 15 December 2015 CPT/Inf (2015) 44 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) Living space per prisoner in prison establishments:
More informationRussian authorities failed to account for air raid killing five people and destroying Chechen village
issued by the Registrar of the Court no. 273 29.03.2011 Russian authorities failed to account for air raid killing five people and destroying Chechen village In today s Chamber judgment in the case Esmukhambetov
More informationPress release issued by the Registrar. Chamber judgment 1. Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia (application no /04)
005 07.01.2010 Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgment 1 Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia (application no. 25965/04) CYPRIOT AND RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES FAILED TO PROTECT 20-YEAR OLD RUSSIAN CABARET
More informationThe Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe
Recommendation Rec(2006)13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the use of remand in custody, the conditions in which it takes place and the provision of safeguards against abuse (Adopted
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 302 (2014) 23.10.2014 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten judgments on Tuesday 28 October 2014 and nine on
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 297 (2013) 16.10.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 19 judgments on Tuesday 22 October 2013 and 16 on Thursday
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FOURTH SECTION CASE OF Y.F. v. TURKEY (Application no. 24209/94) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 July 2003
More information9 November 2009 Public. Amnesty International. Belarus. Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
9 November 2009 Public amnesty international Belarus Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Eighth session of the UPR Working Group of the Human Rights Council May 2010 AI Index: EUR 49/015/2009
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF SAVCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. (Application no /08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 March 2016
SECOND SECTION CASE OF SAVCA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 17963/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 March 2016 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the
More informationTHIRD SECTION. CASE OF U.N. v. RUSSIA. (Application no /15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 26 July 2016
THIRD SECTION CASE OF U.N. v. RUSSIA (Application no. 14348/15) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 July 2016 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It may be
More informationInternational covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/BRA/CO/2 1 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Eighty-fifth session CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS
More informationFIFTH SECTION. CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /99)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA (Application no. 51562/99) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 November 2006 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationThe European Arrest Warrant: One step closer to reform?
QCEA Discussion Paper The European Arrest Warrant: One step closer to reform? Introduction The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is a system in which one EU Member State can ask another EU Member State to
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 341 (2013) 10.12.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 12 judgments on Tuesday 17 December 2013 and 20 on
More informationFIRST SECTION. CASE OF KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA. (Application no /13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 19 October 2017
FIRST SECTION CASE OF KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA (Application no. 55133/13) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 October 2017 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. KNEŽEVIĆ v. CROATIA JUDGMENT
More informationSECOND SECTION. CASE OF GURBAN v. TURKEY. (Application no. 4947/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 15 December 2015
SECOND SECTION CASE OF GURBAN v. TURKEY (Application no. 4947/04) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 December 2015 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention. It
More informationCCPR. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights UNITED NATIONS. Distr. RESTRICTED* CCPR/C/53/D/575/1994 and 576/ April 1995
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr. RESTRICTED* CCPR/C/53/D/575/1994 and 576/1994 5 April 1995 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Fifty-third session DECISIONS
More informationCCPR/C/102/D/1812/2008
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights CCPR/C/102/D/1812/2008 Distr.: General * 25 August 2011 Original: English Human Rights Committee 102 nd session 11-29 July 2011 Views
More informationUzbekistan Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
Public amnesty international Uzbekistan Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Third session of the UPR Working Group of the Human Rights Council 1-12 December 2008 AI Index: EUR 62/004/2008] Amnesty
More informationMembers of the Unification Church in Prison
MOLDOVA The Republic of Moldova became an independent state in August 1991 and is a Parliamentary Republic. Moldova has been a member of the Council of Europe since 1995, and is a Participating State of
More informationOverview ECHR
Overview 1959-2016 ECHR This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general information about the way the Court
More informationComments on the Operational Guidance Note on Sri Lanka (August 2009), prepared for Still Human Still Here by Tony Paterson (Solicitor, A. J.
Comments on the Operational Guidance Note on Sri Lanka (August 2009), prepared for Still Human Still Here by Tony Paterson (Solicitor, A. J. Paterson) 1. This document has been prepared by members of the
More informationGeneral Recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on torture 1
General Recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on torture 1 (a) Countries that are not party to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Optional
More informationMALAWI. A new future for human rights
MALAWI A new future for human rights Over the past two years, the human rights situation in Malawi has been dramatically transformed. After three decades of one-party rule, there is now an open and lively
More informationFIFTH SECTION. CASE OF PEČENKO v. SLOVENIA. (Application no. 6387/10) JUDGMENT
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF PEČENKO v. SLOVENIA (Application no. 6387/10) JUDGMENT This judgment was revised in accordance with Rule 80 of the Rules of Court in a judgment of 29 November 2016. STRASBOURG 4 December
More informationForthcoming judgments
issued by the Registrar of the Court ECHR 343 (2013) 28.11.2013 Forthcoming judgments The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing six judgments on Tuesday 3 December 2013 and 16 on
More informationSubject: Torture and ill-treatment by police officers in Moldova
Karel Schwarzenberg, Foreign Minister of the Czech Republic, Presidency of the European Union Brussels, 4 May 2009 Ref: B857 Dear Mr Schwarzenberg, Subject: Torture and ill-treatment by police officers
More informationFIRST SECTION DECISION
FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 13630/16 M.R. and Others against Finland The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24 May 2016 as a Chamber composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,
More informationHuman Rights in Europe
Human Rights in Europe Legal Bulletin Issue 40 Apri 2003 AIRE Centre London Editors: Nuala Mole Biljana Braithwaite Printout (Serbian/Bosnian/Croatian):7600 Printout (Albanian):1200 Printout (Polish):600
More informationTHIRD SECTION. CASE OF POTCOAVĂ v. ROMANIA. (Application no /07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG. 17 December 2013
THIRD SECTION CASE OF POTCOAVĂ v. ROMANIA (Application no. 27945/07) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 December 2013 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationInternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976
Selected Provisions Article 2 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1 Adopted 16 December 1966 Entered into force 23 March 1976 1. Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its sixty-third session, 30 April 4 May 2012
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 12 July 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention GE.12-15222 Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationConcluding observations on the second periodic report of Cambodia*
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr.: General 27 April 2015 CCPR/C/KHM/CO/2 Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding observations on the second periodic
More informationImplementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights
Declassified by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights at its meeting on Tuesday 21 June 2005. AS/Jur (2005) 35 20 June 2005 ajdoc35 2005 Implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human
More informationDECISIONS. Communication No. 255/1987. [represented by counsel]
Distr. RESTRICTED */ CCPR/C/46/D/255/1987 2 November 1992 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Forty-sixth session DECISIONS Communication No. 255/1987 Submitted by : Alleged victim : State party :
More informationFOURTH SECTION. CASE OF BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA. (Application no /14 and 15 others - see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG
FOURTH SECTION CASE OF BOLDIJAR AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA ( 46831/14 and 15 others - see appended list) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 March 2018 This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
More informationEUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Press release issued by the Registrar. CHAMBER JUDGMENT FREROT v. FRANCE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 406 12.6.2007 Press release issued by the Registrar CHAMBER JUDGMENT FREROT v. FRANCE The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment
More informationCOUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION. CASE OF PUNZELT v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC. (Application no.
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF PUNZELT v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC (Application no. 31315/96) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG
More information