COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Transcription

1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, C(2013) 5119 final COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of on the award of action grants within the framework of the specific programme "Civil Justice" Training of National Judges in EU Law (Call for proposals 2013) EN EN

2 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of on the award of action grants within the framework of the specific programme "Civil Justice" Training of National Judges in EU Law (Call for proposals 2013) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, HAVING REGARD to Decision No 1149/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 September 2007 establishing for the period the Specific Programme Civil Justice as part of the General Programme Fundamental Rights and Justice 1, and in particular article 4(c) thereof. HAVING REGARD to Articles 133 (2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (hereafter referred to as the Financial Regulation ), HAVING REGARD to Article 204 (5) of Commission Delegated Regulation No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (hereafter referred to as the Rules of Application ), HAVING REGARD to the annual work-programme 2013 of 22 November 2012, published on the website of the specific programme Civil Justice, and the Call for Proposals 2013 on Action Grants, published on the website of DG, HAVING REGARD to the unanimous favourable opinion by the Advisory Committee, pursuant to Article 11 (2) of Decision No 1149/2007/EC, Whereas: (1) An Evaluation Committee was appointed pursuant to Article 204 (1) of the Rules of Application. (2) An evaluation was carried out pursuant to Articles 133 (1) and (2) of the Financial Regulation and 204 (1) of the Rules of Application. (3) The attached Evaluation Summary Reports (ESRs) contain all the information required under Article 204 (5) of the Implementing Rules. 1 OJ L257, , p.16. EN 2 EN

3 HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Single Article (a) The budgetary ceiling for grants under the above mentioned call for proposal is EUR (b) Applicants listed in Annex I ("List of succesful applicants ") may receive a grant for the implementation of their respective proposal up to the maximum amount set out in the same annex, subject to the signature of a grant agreement. (c) Applicants listed in Annex II ("Reserve list") are considered rejected by lack of budgetary appropriations. In case additional budgetary appropriations become available those applicants may be contacted (following the ranking order) and informed - at the latest by 01/10/ that they may receive a grant for the implementation of their respective proposal, up to the maximum amount set out in the same annex, subject to budget availability and signature of a grant agreement. (d) The list of rejected applicants is attached as Annex III to this Decision. Done at Brussels, For the Commission Enclosures: Carles Esteva Mosso Director, Directorate General for I. List of succesful applicants II. III. IV. Reserve list List of rejected applicants List of applications received and Evaluation Summary Reports EN 3 EN

4 PRIORITY ANNEX I List of succesful applicants MAIN APPLICANT TITLE NATIONALITY Advanced training of national judges on the application of ERA European law rules - a series of 6 regional seminars across Europe EU GVH Economics Seminar and Judges HU Curso de EILF Direito da Concorrencia para Juizes PT European networking and training EUI for national enforcers 2015 EU Fines and crimes Escuela before Judicial Judges in EU law ES Escuela Judicial Catholic Portugal Leuphana Initial training course on Eu law EU Law Enforcement by National Judges Series of 2 law seminars and national judges ES PT DE TOTAL ELIGIBLE COSTS MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT 147, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , SCORE (X/100) EN 4 EN

5 PRIORITY ANNEX II Reserve list TOTAL ELIGIBLE COSTS MAIN MAXIMUM GRANT AMOUNT SCORE APPLICANT TITLE NATIONALITY (X/100) Training of Radboud judges in EU Nijmegen law NL 194, , Italian Authority Maastricht Council Romania of Minho Oxera Judicial Academy of Slovak Republic Enforcing EU antitrust rules in national courts IT 211, , EU law for judges - A training, networking and e-learning project NL 224, , Economy, legislation and - Transnational training for Romanian, Bulgarian and Croatian judges RO 198, , Integrated seminar on the judicial implementation of EU law PT 19, , Interpreting economic evidence in the law cases UK 104, , EU law and jurisprudence SL 70, , EN 5 EN

6 PRIORITY ANNEX III List of rejected applicants TOTAL ELIGIBLE COSTS MAIN GRANT AMOUNT SCORE APPLICANT TITLE NATIONALITY (X/100) Private Enforcement of Naples in European Parthenope Law IT 303, , Libera Foundation Bignon Lebray of Valencia Molise IUM Academy School Application of EU Law by National Courts: Training for the Bulgarian Judiciary BG 52, , Mise on oeuvre de droit de la concurrence par les juridictions nationales FR 91, , Antitrust law and judicial conflicts resolution in the framework of EU ES 45, , The European online dictionary IT 46, , The violation of in the EU Treaty field IT 55, , EN 6 EN

7 ANNEX IV List of applications received and Evaluation Summary Reports (1) EUI (European Institute), San Domenico di Fiesole (Firenze), Italy (European networking and training for national enforcers 2015) (2) Maastricht - Faculty of Law, Maastricht, the Netherlands (EU law for judges - A training, networking and e-learning project) (3) Radboud Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Training of judges in EU law) (4) Bignon Lebray, Paris, France (Mise on ouevre de droit de la concurrence par les juridictions nationales) (5) Council of Romania, Bucharest, Romania, (Economy, legislation and - Transnational training for Romanian, Bulgarian and Croatian judges) (6) Autorita garante della concorrenza e del Mercato, Rome, Italy (Enforcing EU antitrust rules in national courts) (7) Oxera Consulting, Oxford, UK (Interpreting economic evidence in the law cases) (8) GVH (Hungarian Authority), Budapest, Hungary ( Economics Seminar and Judges) (9) of Minho, Braga, Portugal (Integrated seminar on the judicial implementation of EU law) (10) Judicial Academy of the Slovak Republic, Pezinov, Slovak Republic (EU law and jurisprudence) (11) IUM Academy School, Napoli, Italy (The violation of in the EU Treaty field) (12) Leuphana, Lueneburg, Germany (Series of 2 law seminars and national judges) (13) ERA (Academy of European Law), Trier, Germany, (Advanced training of national judges on the application of European law rules - a series of 6 regional seminars across Europe) (14) Molise, Campobasso, Italy (The European on-line dictionary) (15) Escuela Judicial (Judicail School of the General Council of the Judiciary (EJ-CGPJ), Barcelona, Spain (Fines and crimes before Judges in EU law) (16) Escuela Judicial (Judicail School of the General Council of the Judiciary (EJ-CGPJ), Barcelona, Spain (Initial training course on EU law) EN 7 EN

8 (17) of Valencia, Spain (Antitrust law and judicial conflicts resolution in the framework of EU) (18) of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy (Private Enforcement in European Law) (19) Catholic of Portugal, Porto, Portugal (EU Law Enforcement by National Judges) (20) EILF of the of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal (Curso de Direio da Concorrencia para Juizes) (21) Libera Foudation, Sofia, Bulgaria (Application of EU Law by National Courts: Training for the Bulgarian Judiciary) EN 8 EN