IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
|
|
- Aubrey Rodgers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JUDIE BATT YARNELL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2017-CA JARED N. QUARTELL, ESQ., an individual, LAW OFFICES OF JARED QUARTELL, P.A. d/b/a QUARTELL LAW FIRM, P.A., a Florida corporation, EUSTICE T. STRICKLAND, an individual, SCHOOL INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation, and LDR ACADEMY, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendants. / AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Judie Batt Yarnell, sues: Jared N. Quartell, Esq. ( Quartell ) and the Law Offices of Jared Quartell, P.A. d/b/a Quartell Law Firm, P.A. (the Firm ) (together, the Attorneys ); Eustice T. Strickland ( Strickland ) and School Investment Properties, Inc. ( SIP ) (together, the Brokers ); and LDR Academy, Inc. ( Seller ), and states: JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND PARTIES 1. This is an action for damages that exceed $15,000.00, exclusive of interest, costs and attorneys fees. 2. Plaintiff is an adult individual who resides in Palm Beach County, Florida. 3. The Firm is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. Quartell is an adult individual who resides in Palm Beach County, Florida, and who was associated and practicing with the Firm at all material times.
2 5. SIP is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Palm Beach County, Florida. 6. Strickland is an adult individual who resides in Palm Beach County, Florida, who worked for SIP and was acting as an agent of SIP at all material times. 7. The Seller is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Palm Beach County, Florida. 8. Venue is proper in Palm Beach County, Florida, pursuant to Section Florida statues, because the causes of action accrued in Palm Beach County, Florida, and the Defendants are located in Palm Beach County, Florida. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS A. Plaintiff s Introduction to the Property through the Brokers. 9. In early 2015, Plaintiff, who owned a private school at that time, was solicited by the Brokers to relocate her business to another property, located at U.S. Highway One, Juno Beach, FL (the Property ), which had more space to accommodate Plaintiff s growing student body. 10. Strickland went to Plaintiff s old business location for the purpose of trying to sell her the Property. At that time, Strickland represented that he had the perfect location for Plaintiff to relocate her private school. 11. The Brokers held themselves out as having more than 28 years of experience exclusively brokering the sale of schools and claimed to be #1 in their field, with unparalleled expertise in that niche market. 12. The Brokers represented themselves as specialists in real estate transactions involving the purchase and sale of child care facilities and private schools. 2
3 13. Throughout the transaction including in a flyer provided to Plaintiffs in early 2015, initial meetings with Plaintiff, meetings with Plaintiff and staff in early 2016, and up through the date of closing Strickland represented that he had been involved in more than 12,000 real estate transactions involving the sale of schools. 14. When the Brokers first approached Plaintiff, she was not looking to purchase property to relocate her school. However, with a lot of pressure and numerous representations concerning how perfect the new location would be for her private school, the Brokers eventually convinced Plaintiff to consider the purchase. 15. In or around May of 2015, after Seller s business had closed for the day, the Brokers showed Plaintiff the Property for the first time. On that occasion, and numerous occasions thereafter, Strickland continued to represent that the Property would be the ideal location to relocate Plaintiff s private school. 16. On or about February 10, 2016, in a meeting with Plaintiff, Strickland represented that the Property was properly zoned for use as a private school. In the same meeting, Strickland stated that the Property was ideal, because, unlike other properties, it would not require a difficult rezoning process to be used for Plaintiff s school. 17. At the same meeting, Strickland represented that the Property was move-in ready and that Plaintiff would only have to complete minor interior renovations (specifically, constructing additional partition walls to separate class rooms at an approximate budget of $100,000-$150,000) to accommodate her intended use as a private school. In fact, Strickland brought a copy of site plans to the meeting to show Plaintiff how the interior build-out would look. 3
4 18. To induce Plaintiff into making the purchase, Strickland also offered to arrange for private financing for interior renovations to the Property after closing, in order to better accommodate Plaintiff s intended use as a private school. B. Plaintiff Purchases the Property. 19. In reliance on the Brokers representations and purported specialized expertise, on or about February 21, 2016, Plaintiff entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase for the Property from the Seller for $2,800,000 (the Contract ). [A copy of the Contract is attached as Exhibit A]. 20. Notably, the Contract specifically provided that the purpose of the purchase, and intended use of the Property, was for a private school. [Contract, VII.] 21. Moreover, although the Contract stated that Plaintiff would take title subject to certain restrictions, easements and limitations (such as land use plans, zoning and other prohibitions imposed by government authorities), it expressly provided that there would be: (a) no violation of any of the foregoing at closing; and (b) none that would prevent the use of the Property as a private school. [Id.] C. Plaintiff s Attorneys Fail to Discover that the Property Cannot be Used for a Private School Due to Zoning Restrictions. 22. On August 25, 2015, a couple of months after first viewing the Property, Plaintiff first met with the Attorneys regarding the possible purchase of the Property. 23. Notably, the Attorneys expressly advertised real estate & title as one of their primary practice areas. In addition to a J.D., Quartell also has an LL.M. in Real Property and Land Development. 24. On or about February 23, 2016, just after entering into the Contract, Plaintiff officially retained the Attorneys to represent her in the purchase of the Property. 4
5 25. The Attorneys had more than two months after being officially retained, and in reality much longer due to their earlier meetings, to conduct due diligence on Plaintiff s behalf related to the Property. 26. The Attorneys contacted the Palm Beach County Planning, Zoning and Building Department in order to run a lien search, open permit search, and code violations search on the Property. 27. The Attorneys, however, failed to research, discover and/or advise Plaintiff that the Property was not properly zoned for use as a private school prior to closing. D. Plaintiff Closes on the Property and Later Discovers the Zoning Restriction. 28. On May 10, 2016, Plaintiff and the Seller closed on the sale of the Property. 29. The timing of the transaction was critical, as Plaintiff needed to relocate the location of the school during the summer months when school was not in session in order to avoid losing business. Notably, pursuant to the Contract s attached Standards for Real Estate Transactions, timing [was] of the essence. [Contract, at letter I.] 30. Among other things, Plaintiff s lease on the old school building was expiring in June of 2016 and Plaintiff needed to be up and running at the new Property by August 18, 2016 for the new school year. 31. Plaintiff specifically advised the Brokers and the Attorneys that she would have to have the Property up and running before August 18, 2016, in order to ensure a smooth transition of her private school business from the old location to the Property. 32. Unfortunately, on May 24, 2016, a couple of weeks after closing, while Plaintiff s architect was working with the City on the planned build-out at the Property, Plaintiff learned for the first time that the Property was not properly zoned for use as a private school. 5
6 E. Plaintiff s Damages. 33. As a result, Plaintiff has incurred substantial damages to bring the Property into compliance with the as-represented and intended use, as well as to mitigate her damages related to the business itself. These general and special damages include, among other things: a. professional fees, attorney s fees and municipal fees related to rezoning the Property; b. rent, build-out costs, extra moving costs, and related additional operating expenses to set up a temporary business location while the Property was being rezoned; c. loss of use of the Property and lost profits due to the inability to house the expected number of students; d. additional architecture, construction, engineering, landscaping and surveying fees related to bringing the Property into compliance; and e. numerous other miscellaneous expenses. [A preliminary, itemized list of Plaintiff s damages is attached as Exhibit B.] 34. All conditions precedent to this action have been performed or waived. 35. Plaintiff has retained the undersigned attorneys to represent her in this action and is required to pay them a reasonable fee for their services. COUNT I BREACH OF CONTRACT (Seller) 36. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 as if fully set forth herein. 37. Plaintiff and the Seller entered into a valid Contract for Plaintiff to purchase the Property from the Seller for $2,800,000. [Exhibit A.] 6
7 38. The Seller breached the Contract by transferring title to the Property that was subject to certain restrictions; specifically, the Property was not properly zoned to be used as a private school as specified in the Contract. 39. As a result of the Seller s breach, Plaintiff has been damaged. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against the Seller for general and special damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs, attorney s fees pursuant to the Contract and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT II LEGAL MALPRACTICE / PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE (Attorneys) 40. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 as if fully set forth herein. 41. At all material times, the Attorneys were in the business of providing professional legal services for compensation to the general public. 42. The Attorneys owed Plaintiff a duty to use reasonable care and to render services with that degree of skill, care, knowledge, and judgment possessed and exercised by other members of the legal profession. 43. The Attorneys negligently performed the legal services and otherwise violated the professional duty of care through the actions or inactions described herein. 44. Specifically, the Attorneys breached the duty owed to Plaintiff to exercise the degree of care that would be exercised by other reasonably skilled legal professionals practicing under the same circumstances by failing to advise Plaintiff that the Property could not be used for the purpose of housing a private school and/or that zoning restrictions prohibited same. 45. As set forth above, Plaintiff has suffered significant damages as a direct and proximate result of the Attorneys failure to provide professional legal services at a level expected of reasonably competent legal professionals. 7
8 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for general and special damages against the Attorneys, costs, interest, and any further relief the Court deems appropriate. COUNT III BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY (Attorneys) 46. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 as if fully set forth herein. 47. Plaintiff reposed trust and confidence in the Attorneys, and the Attorneys undertook that trust and assumed the duty to advise, counsel, and protect Plaintiff s interests. 48. The Attorneys owed Plaintiff a fiduciary duty of care in providing professional legal services to carry out their responsibilities in an informed and considered manner and to act as an ordinary prudent person would act in the management of his or her own affairs, including an obligation to act in good faith, to act with undivided loyalty, and to provide full and fair disclosure of all material facts. 49. Moreover, due to the Attorneys representations that they possessed special skills i.e., practicing in the areas of real estate and title work the Attorneys owed Plaintiff a fiduciary duty to exercise those skills. 50. Through the actions and inactions set forth above, the Attorneys breached their fiduciary duty owed to Plaintiff, including by failing to exercise care in carrying out their responsibilities related to reviewing title defects and zoning restrictions that would interfere with Plaintiff s intended use of the Property and informing Plaintiff of same. 51. In addition, the Attorneys breached their fiduciary duty to Plaintiff by failing to exercise their special skills and experience in the areas of real estate transactions and title work. 52. As a direct and proximate result of the Attorneys breach of their fiduciary duty, Plaintiff has suffered damages. 8
9 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for general and special damages against the Attorneys, costs, interest, and any further relief the Court deems appropriate. COUNT IV INFORMATION NEGLIGENTLY SUPPLIED FOR GUIDANCE OF OTHERS (Brokers) 53. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 if fully set forth herein. 54. The Brokers, in the course of their business, profession, or employment, supplied false information for the guidance of Plaintiff. 55. Specifically, the Brokers misrepresented that the Property would be the ideal location for Plaintiff s private school and could be used for that purpose, including stating that: The Property was properly zoned for use as a private school. The Property was ideal for Plaintiff s school. The Property would not require a difficult rezoning process to be used for Plaintiff s school. The Property was move-in ready and that Plaintiff would only have to complete minor interior renovations (constructing additional partition walls to separate class rooms) to accommodate her intended use as a private school. 56. The Brokers, as purported specialists in the field of private schools real estate transactions, had superior knowledge and knew, or should have known, that said information provided to Plaintiff was false. 57. The Brokers had a pecuniary interest in the real estate transaction. 58. The Brokers failed to exercise reasonable care or competence in obtaining or communicating said information to Plaintiff. 59. The Brokers intended for Plaintiff to rely on said information, intended to influence Plaintiff into buying the Property, or knew that Plaintiff intended to rely on same. 9
10 60. Plaintiff justifiably relied on the information provided by the Brokers when purchasing the Property. 61. As a direct and proximate result of the Brokers negligently supplied information, Plaintiff has been damaged WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for general and special damages against the Brokers, costs, interest, and any further relief the Court deems appropriate. COUNT V NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (Brokers) 62. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 if fully set forth herein. 63. As set forth above, the Brokers made misrepresentations of material fact to induce Plaintiff into purchasing the Property. 64. Specifically, the Brokers misrepresented that the Property would be the ideal location for Plaintiff s private school and could be used for that purpose, including stating that: The Property was properly zoned for use as a private school. The Property was ideal for Plaintiff s school. The Property would not require a difficult rezoning process to be used for Plaintiff s school. The Property was move-in ready and that Plaintiff would only have to complete minor interior renovations (constructing additional partition walls to separate class rooms) to accommodate her intended use as a private school. 65. The Brokers held themselves out as experts in real estate transactions, specifically in brokering the sale of schools. 10
11 66. The Brokers were negligent in making these misrepresentations because they knew or should have known they were false and/or made the misrepresentations without knowledge of their truth or falsity. 67. The Brokers intended to induce Plaintiff into relying and acting on these misrepresentations. 68. Plaintiff justifiably relied on the Broker s misrepresentations by, among other things, purchasing the Property believing that it was an ideal location to relocate her private school business. 69. As a direct and proximate result of the Broker s negligent misrepresentations, Plaintiff has been damaged. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for general and special damages against the Brokers, costs, interest, and any further relief the Court deems appropriate. COUNT VI NEGLIGENCE (Brokers) 70. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 35 as if fully set forth herein. 71. Pursuant to Fla. Stat (2), the Brokers owed Plaintiff, among other duties, the duty to (a) deal honestly and fairly; and (b) use skill, care, and diligence in the transaction. transactions. 72. Moreover, the Brokers held themselves out as experts in private school real estate 73. The Brokers breached the aforementioned duties by selling Plaintiffs a school that could not be used for her desired purpose and making numerous misrepresentations regarding the property, when, in fact, the Property was not properly zoned for Plaintiff s intended use. 11
12 damaged. 74. As a direct and proximate result of the Broker s breach, Plaintiff has been WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment for general and special damages against the Brokers, costs, interest, and any further relief the Court deems appropriate. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demand trial by jury on all issues so triable. MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A. Business Trial Group /s/ Roger C. Brown Roger C. Brown Florida Bar No James E. Fakhoury Florida Bar No N. Flagler Dr., Ste West Palm Beach, Florida Telephone: (561) Facsimile: (561) RBrown@forthepeople.com JFakhoury@forthepeople.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 12
Filing # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM
Filing # 35008457 E-Filed 12/01/2015 02:28:55 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION MARK LaROCCA and SILVIA LaROCCA, v. Plaintiffs, Case
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
JOHN S. CARROLL 649-0 810 Richards Street, Suite 810 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone No. (808 526-9111 Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ERNEST Y. INADA
More information2. Green Tree is without knowledge of the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of
Filing # 18618546 Electronically Filed 09/24/2014 02:01:24 PM IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2014CA007769 AH FELTON JACK SMITH, JR. Plaintiff,
More informationCASE NO.: DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: DIVISION MARION MAYER Plaintiff, vs. LAUREN SAMMIS, individually, SAMMIS SALES, LLC, BEN SCHACHTER, DVM,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM
Filing # 65776381 E-Filed 12/22/2017 05:53:20 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA JASMINE BATES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of AMARI HARLEY,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM
Filing # 46814510 E-Filed 09/22/2016 04:42:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2014CA007769 AH MICHELLE SMITH, as Personal Representative
More informationPLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA KARL MAKOVSKY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JEAN IRENE MAKOVSKY, and as Agent for KEITH MAKOVSKY,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 05/08/ :47:12 PM
Filing # 71825458 E-Filed 05/08/2018 12:47:12 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Orlando Division
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Orlando Division DEBRA LINDSAY, an individual; SAMANTHA MIATA, an individual; BRIAN ABERMAN, an individual; JACK ABERMAN, an individual; and GEA
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationFiling # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM
Filing # 87751951 E-Filed 04/10/2019 11:26:28 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA FLORIDA SPINE & ORTHOPEDICS INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. JOSEPH
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 10:56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO. 651899/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW
More informationFiling # E-Filed 03/07/ :02:15 AM
Filing # 86000280 E-Filed 03/07/2019 09:02:15 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
More informationFIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 12/2/2014 5:31 PM 01-CV-2014-904803.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION Genesis
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.
Filing # 15405805 Electronically Filed 06/30/2014 04:31:04 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION KERRY INMAN, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, INTERACTIVE MEDIA MARKETING, INC. and
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationCase 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:16-cv-80588-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6 SHIPPING and TRANSIT, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA vs. Plaintiff, STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION JAMES SEITZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAUREN E. SEITZ, DECEASED, Case No. 3:18-CV-00044-FDW-DSC v.
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiffs and all those similarly situated.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Stephen L. Weber, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) Michael J. White, Esq. (AZ SBN 01) James W. Fleming, Esq. (AZ SBN 0) KASDAN SIMONDS WEBER & VAUGHAN, LLP 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 Phone:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
Filing # 16054305 Electronically Filed 07/17/2014 04:43:43 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, CASE NO: Plaintiff, v. PRIME RESORTS
More informationFiling # E-Filed 01/31/ :35:29 PM
Filing # 51875490 E-Filed 01/31/2017 03:35:29 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SHARON MEMMER, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA ROYER BORGES and EMELY DELFIN, as the natural parents and guardians of ANTHONY BORGES, CASE NO.: vs. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JUSTIN ELLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. FIRST PREMIER BANK, Defendant. FIRST PREMIER BANK, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. CASSANDRA WHITAKER,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORJ\ffiY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 3658 9 ~nnl\,
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:17-cv-04831-WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POWER PLAY 1 LLC, and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, NORFOLK
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: COMPLAINT
Filing # 75680554 E-Filed 07/30/2018 12:26:59 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL
More informationCase 8:15-cv SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:15-cv-01484-SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NATIONWIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation, v.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CA XXXXAB CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, vs. JANUS HOTELS AND
More informationDENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI
CAUSE NO. C-0166-17-H DENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI Defendants. HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL
More informationFiling # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM
Filing # 27631401 E-Filed 05/22/2015 01:20:45 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION BERNICE CLARK, as Personal Representative
More informationFiling # E-Filed 07/13/ :52:45 AM
Filing # 74885415 E-Filed 07/13/2018 09:52:45 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF
More informationmuia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:15cv-05921DSF-FFM Document 1 fled 08/05/15 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1 1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) 2 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071 4 Telephone:
More informationPlaintiff, JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Pro Se, hereby files this Response to the Motion to. Introduction
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 2014 CA 2505 ON JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Plaintiff, vs. PUNITIVE DAMAGES PERSONAL INJURY HERITAGE PARTNERS
More information1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
1:15-cv-01511-JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Robert K. Besley, Jr., on behalf of himself ) and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 12, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 12, 2005 Session SPENCER D. LAND, ET AL. v. JOHN L. DIXON, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 04C986 Samuel H. Payne, Judge
More informationPlaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Bonnie U. Pittman, individually and as C.A. NO: 2016-CP-23-00945 Trustee of the Dorothy F. King Living
More informationCase 2:18-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1
Case 2:18-cv-17206-JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 GREGG F. PASTER & ASSOCIATES Gregg F. Paster, Esq. (GP0977) 530 Sylvan Avenue-Suite 201 Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 201-489-0078
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR MANATEE COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff, TIMOTHY YOUNG, as Personal Representative of the Estate of ALLEN
More informationCourthouse News Service
~ Ronald J. Tocchini CSBN Lilia G. Alcaraz CSBN 0 L Street Suite 0 Sacramento, California - USA Telephone: ( ) - Facsimile: ()- Attorneys for MARIA CHAVEZ Supertor Court Of Califs? ila, Sacramento Da,rmi&
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )
ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA 912345 Telephone: (949 123-4567 Facsimile: (949 123-4567 Email: attorney@law.com ATTORNEY, Attorney for P1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION. ClassAction.
Filing # 62197581 E-Filed 09/29/2017 01:53:34 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION ANDERSON MORENO, a minor, by and through his
More informationCase 0:14-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2014 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:14-cv-61533-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/03/2014 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION ROBERT M. HIRSH and ARTHUR W. HIRSH,
More informationCOMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
ABRAHAM HERBAS, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. CITY OF SWEETWATER, a municipality within the State of Florida, Defendant. / COMPLAINT AND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.:
JAMAAL ANDERSON, JACOB BELL, DERRICK GAFFNEY, TAVARES GOODEN, FRANK GORE, SANTONIO HOLMES, GREG JONES, JEVON KEARSE, KENARD LANG, RAY LEWIS, BRANDON MERIWEATHER, SANTANA MOSS, CLINTON PORTIS, LITO SHEPPARD,
More informationCase 1:16-cv RM-NYW Document 17 Filed 03/23/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:16-cv-00518-RM-NYW Document 17 Filed 03/23/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 Civil Action No. FIROOZEH DUMAS, an individual, v. Plaintiff, WARNER LITERARY GROUP, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-23619-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MAINSTREAM ADVERTISING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
More information"~'J;' v" 02li 34r...,;;
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,. '. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, r 'tn, 1A"I '...".", "~'J;' v" 02li
More informationCAUSE NO. INTERNATIONAL CENTER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DEVELOPMENT, IX, LTD., VS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendant JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CAUSE NO. Filed 11 December 16 P12:12 Gary Fitzsimmons District Clerk Dallas District INTERNATIONAL CENTER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DEVELOPMENT, IX, LTD., Plaintiff VS DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS BOKA POWELL,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) 0 North California Blvd., Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- Facsimile: () 0-00 E-Mail:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationDEFENDANTS FRANK AVELLINO AND MICHAEL BIENES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
Filing # 17220952 Electronically Filed 08/18/2014 04:30:39 PM P & S ASSOCIATES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, etc. et al., Plaintiffs, vs. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 08/28/ :22:03 PM
Filing # 31468664 E-Filed 08/28/2015 04:22:03 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA WALDEN LAKE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit
More informationCourthouse News Service
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 6/15/2009 4:12 PM CV-2009-900370.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA MAGARIA HAMNER BOBO, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA JACK MEADOWS, on behalf
More informationCase 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00248-KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 FILED 2013 Feb-05 PM 12:07 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 0:18-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:18-cv-62575-WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/26/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. ERA LOWRY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
More informationCONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ("Agreement") is entered into on this day of, 20, by and between BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY''
More informationCase 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14
Case :-cv-0-lb Document Filed 0// Page of MICHAEL A. SCHAPS (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. SCHAPS Third Street, Suite B Davis, CA Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - mschaps@michaelschaps.com Attorney for
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-01025-RHK-LIB Document 7 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Ellering; Karen Ellering; Select Associates Realty, LLC; EJK, Inc., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD
More informationCase 3:10-cv B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-01787-B Document 1 Filed 09/10/10 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JERRE FREY, individually, Plaintiff VS. Civil Action
More informationCASE NO.: Entertainment Group, Inc. ("Imani"), Keyshia Cole ("Ms. Cole") and Manny Halley ("Halley")
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DMSION Cartelz Worldwide, Inc.., vs. Plaintiff, Imani Entertainment Group, Inc., Keyshia Cole
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. December 10, Thereafter, the Chief Judge of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. KURT S. HARMON, Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC08-2310 The Florida Bar File Nos. 2008-50,741(17A) 2008-51,596(17A)
More informationSuperior Court of California
Superior Court of California County of Orange Case Number : 0--0001-CU-NP-CXC Copy Request: Request Type: Case Documents Prepared for: cns Number of documents: 1 Number of pages: Todd M. Friedman, Esq.-
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. WINDOW VISIONS,
More informationCase 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-00-blf Document Filed /0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: ()
More informationCourthouse News Service
RENZO RANGEL Plaintiff, vs. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ISOLA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, MULTIPLE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008 CA 000199 IMERGENT. INC., and STORESONLINE,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO. 652831/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011 Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York -------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 1:08-cv JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:08-cv-05668-JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 Mark D. Mailman, I.D. No. MDM 1122 John Soumilas, I.D. No. JS 0034 FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. Land Title Building, 19 th Floor
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of Himself and All ) Case No. 98-009023-AI Others Similarly
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE RICK HARTMAN, individually and on : CIVIL ACTION NO. behalf of all others similarly situated, : : CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff, : FOR
More informationOffice of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs
In the Matter of Map Destinations, et. al. Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is entered into between Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, GABRIEL I. MARTIN Respondent. / Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2418 The Florida Bar File Nos. 2007-70,046(11M) & 2007-70,934(11M)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:09-cv-06070-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 12/01/09 Page 1 of 16 MINTZ & GOLD LLP Steven G. Mintz (SM 5428) Andrew P. Napolitano (APN 3272) 470 Park Avenue South 10 th Floor North New York, N.Y. 10016-6819
More informationCourthouse News Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION UNITES STATES POSTAL SERVICE, * * Plaintiff, * * vs. * CASE NO. * CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES OF * ATLANTA, INC., and
More informationCase 8:14-cv CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56
Case 814-cv-01892-CEH-MAP Document 8 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 22 PageID 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Civil Case No. 814-cv-01892-CEH-MAP RYAN
More informationIN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE COUNTY COURT, IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION MATTHEW D. WEIDNER, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: v. GEEKSUPPORTLIVE INC Defendant. / PLAINTIFF S VERIFIED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Matthew
More informationEQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT
EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT THIS EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of this [ ] day of [ ] by and between Ascentium Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ATLANTICA ONE, LLC, ETC., Appellant, v.
More informationCase 0:13-cv MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 0:13-cv-62650-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2013 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JESSICA MEDINA, CARLA KLEINUBING, DAVID TALMASON and LAURA BARBER,
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:17-cv-07647-WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X Civil Action No. JAMES WHITELEY, COMPLAINT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO. 650457/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DAS COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case -cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID # 0 0 Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) POMERANTZ LLP North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 00 Telephone (0) -0 E-mail jpafiti@pomlaw.com POMERANTZ LLP Jeremy A. Lieberman
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff, Robin Sergi, and all others similarly situated IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -0- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA - TELEPHONE (0) - WILLIAM M. SHERNOFF # EVANGELINE FISHER GROSSMAN #0 JOEL A. COHEN # SHERNOFF BIDART & DARRAS, LLP 00 South Indian Hill Boulevard Claremont, CA Telephone: (0) - Facsimile:
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY QUINTON DURUJI, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated; vs. Plaintiffs, Case No: PLATINUM SERVICES, INC. n/k/a PLATINUM SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00978 Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WOODLAND DRIVE LLC 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 v. Plaintiff, JAMES
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No: PETITION THE PARTIES
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR DUBUQUE COUNTY QUINTON DURUJI, on Behalf of Himself and all Others Similarly Situated; vs. Plaintiffs, Case No: PLATINUM SERVICES, INC. n/k/a PLATINUM SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :44 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x NUE RESOURCE FUNDING, LLC, Index No.: 650454/2016 a New Jersey Limited
More informationCASE NO. Defendant. / PLAINTIFFS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Plaintiff OCTAVIO FERNANDEZ ( Octavio ), individually and on behalf of all others
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION OCTAVIO FERNANDEZ, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff, CLASS REPRESENTATION FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
More information: : : : : : : : Adversary Case No. : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT TO DETERMINE NON-DISCHARGEABILITY OF DEBT TO PLAINTIFF
HELFAND & HELFAND Andrew B. Helfand (AH-8277) Michael C. D Aries (MD-4888) 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1048 New York, NY 10165 (212) 599-3303 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48 TH STREET CAPITAL, INC., INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS OP EQUITIES, LLC AND
More informationEBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS ) CASE No.: SIMILARLY SITUATED, ) 7 ) 8 Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION vs. ) COMPLAINT 9 ) FOR VIOLATIONS
More information