IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.
|
|
- Linette Tyler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD S. CROFT, III, LAWRENCE J. MATTHEWS, STEPHEN A. OLLENDORFF, PHILLIP A. O REILLY, BERT SAGER, A. EUGENE SAPP, JR., RONALD D. SCHMIDT, LEWIS SOLOMON, ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AND EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Defendants. No CA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL RECORD HOLDERS AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF COMMON STOCK OF ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ARTESYN AT ANY TIME FROM FEBRUARY 2, 2006 UP TO AND INCLUDING APRIL 28, THIS NOTICE WAS SENT TO YOU BY ORDER OF THE COURT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF THIS CLASS ACTION AND, IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT DESCRIBED BELOW. IF YOU HELD SHARES OF ARTESYN STOCK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER. This Notice is not a lawsuit against you, you are not being sued. You have received this Notice because you may be a member of the settlement class described in this Notice. I. PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE This notice is given pursuant to an Order of the Circuit Court of the 15 th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida (the Court entered in the above-captioned action (the Action on July 31, 2006 (the Scheduling Order. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the pendency and proposed settlement of the Action (the Settlement, and the Court s conditional certification of a Settlement Class for purposes of the Settlement, and to notify you of a hearing to be held on October 20, 2006 at 8:00 a.m., before the Court at the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room: , Courtroom Number: 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida (the Settlement Hearing for the purpose of determining: (i whether the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; (ii whether the Settlement Class should be finally certified and whether the Settlement Class Representative and Settlement Class Counsel have adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class with respect to the Action and the claims asserted therein; (iii whether judgment should be entered pursuant to the Stipulation, among other things, dismissing the Action with prejudice; and (iv other matters relating to the proposed Settlement. The Court has determined that for purposes of the Settlement only, the Action shall be conditionally maintained as a class action pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P on behalf of the Settlement Class. At the Settlement Hearing, the Court will also consider whether the Settlement Class should be permanently certified as a settlement class pursuant to Fla. R. Civ. P , and whether Plaintiff and its counsel have adequately represented the Class. This Notice describes the rights that you may have pursuant to the Settlement and what steps you may, but are not required to take, in relation to the Settlement.
2 If the Court approves the Settlement, the Settling Parties (as defined below will ask the Court at the Settlement Hearing to enter an Order and Final Judgment dismissing the Action with prejudice on the merits and releasing all Settled Claims. The Court has reserved the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to the Class other than by announcement at the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof. The Court has further reserved the right to approve the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing with such modifications as may be consented to by the Settling Parties and without further Notice to the members of the Class. II. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF THE SETTLEMENT THE FOLLOWING RECITATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON THE STATEMENTS OF THE PARTIES AND SHOULD NOT BE UNDERSTOOD AS AN EXPRESSION OF ANY OPINION OF THE COURT AS TO THE MERITS OF ANY OF THE CLAIMS OR DEFENSES RAISED BY ANY OF THE PARTIES. On February 2, 2006, Emerson Electric Co. ( Emerson and Artesyn Technologies, Inc. ( Artesyn announced that they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which Emerson would acquire all of Artesyn s outstanding common stock for $11.00 per share in cash (the Merger. On February 23, 2006, Artesyn filed a preliminary proxy statement for the Merger on Form PREM14A (the Preliminary Proxy with the Securities and Exchange Commission. On March 2, 2006, the Action - a putative class action lawsuit challenging the Merger - was filed in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. On March 10, 2006, Plaintiff Samco Partners served its first request for production of documents to all defendants and notices of deposition for each of the defendants (the Discovery Demands. Between March 6 and March 16, 2006, counsel conferred concerning a possible resolution of the Action, and Plaintiff s counsel reviewed and provided comments on subsequent drafts of the Preliminary Proxy, which included demands by Plaintiff s counsel that additional information be included in the final proxy filed with the SEC and mailed to shareholders (the Merger Proxy Statement. On March 16, 2006 Plaintiff and Defendants (the Settling Parties executed a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU detailing their agreement to settle the Action. On April 28, 2006 the Merger was approved by more than 99% of the shares that were voted and was thereafter consummated on that same day. Artesyn produced approximately 900 pages of documents to Plaintiff, and Plaintiff took the depositions (all testimony under oath of Lewis Solomon, Lead Independent Director of Artesyn and Chairman of the Strategic Planning Committee of Artesyn s Board of Directors, and Eric Wagner, a Senior Vice President at Lehman Brothers, Inc. (Artesyn s Financial Advisor. The Court has certified the Action as a class action, for settlement purposes only, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.220, on behalf of all persons or entities who owned Artesyn common stock at any time from February 2, 2006, through and including April 28, 2006, and all of their successors in interest and transferees, immediate and remote, but not Defendants and persons or entities related or affiliated with Defendants (the Settlement Class. The Court has designated as Settlement Class Counsel in the Action, Vianale & Vianale LLP, 2499 Glades Road, Suite 112, Boca Raton, Florida 33421, ( , and The Brualdi Law Firm, 29 Broadway, 24 th Floor, New York, New York 10006, ( Settlement Class Counsel are available to answer any questions from Settlement Class Members concerning any matter contained in this Notice. III. REASONS FOR THE SETTLEMENT Plaintiff s counsel recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Action through trial and through appeals. Plaintiff's counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as the Action, as well as the difficulties and 2
3 delays inherent in such litigation. Plaintiff's counsel are also mindful of the inherent problems of proof and possible defenses to the violations asserted in the Action. Plaintiff s counsel have made a comprehensive and thorough investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in the Action, as well as the facts and circumstances relevant to the Action, through their independent investigation, their review of documents produced by Artesyn, their depositions of Lewis Solomon and Eric Wagner respectively, and through independent consultations with their own advisors and consultants regarding the Action. Based on their discovery and independent investigation, Plaintiff s counsel have determined that a settlement of the Action on the terms reflected in the Stipulation of Settlement (the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, adequate, and in the best interest of the class. Defendants, to avoid the costs, disruption, and distraction of further litigation, and without admitting the validity of any allegations made in the Action, or any liability with respect thereto, have concluded that it is desirable that the claims against them be settled on the terms reflected in the Stipulation. Defendants maintain that none has committed any breach of fiduciary duty, any disclosure violation or any other breach or violation whatsoever, including, but not limited to, in connection with the Merger, the price per share and other consideration offered by Emerson, the Merger Agreement, the Merger Proxy Statement, or any other disclosures regarding the terms of the Merger or Merger Agreement, but believe it desirable to settle the Action on the terms described herein. IV. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT A. Terms of the Proposed Settlement 1. In Settlement of the Action, Defendants agreed to reduce the termination fee, described in Paragraph 8.3(b of the Merger Agreement, payable by Artesyn to Emerson under certain circumstances from $15 million to $10 million. 2. Defendants also agreed to and did disclose additional information in the Merger Proxy Statement, including, among other things, the following: (i Additional disclosure regarding the agreement between Artesyn and Lehman Brothers Inc., including (A that Lehman Brothers will receive a fee of approximately $5.8 million for its services in connection with the Merger; (B that $1 million of that fee was paid for the delivery of Lehman Brothers fairness opinion, and that the remainder is contingent on completion of the Merger; and (C that Lehman Brothers is entitled to reimbursement of its expenses and indemnification by Artesyn for certain liabilities that may arise out of Lehman Brothers' engagement and its rendering of the fairness opinion. (ii Additional disclosure regarding the 17 potential buyers approached by Lehman Brothers in connection with the targeted process for sale of the entire company, as well as the criteria upon which those potential buyers were selected. (iii Additional disclosure regarding the initial introductory meeting between Artesyn s Chief Executive Officer and Emerson s President to discuss a potential business combination. (iv Additional information regarding the status of the due diligence investigation at the time of Emerson s revised indication of interest with a value range of $12.00-$12.25 per share in cash on September 26, 2005, and thereafter up to its subsequent offer on November 22, 2005, for $10.75 per share in cash. (v Additional information regarding the absence of other acceptable offers from the other parties. (vi Additional information regarding amounts that each director and/or executive officer of Artesyn was to receive in the Merger pursuant to the acceleration of unvested stock options. (vii $11.00 per share. (viii Additional information regarding the Artesyn Board of Directors determination to accept a bid of Additional information regarding the Lehman Brothers analysis, including: 3
4 EBITDA Analysis. Additional information on the information used by Lehman Brothers to perform its analysis. P/E Multiples. Additional information on the information used by Lehman Brothers to perform its analysis. (ix Disclosure regarding the Action. 3. Defendants acknowledge that the decision to disclose the above additional information in the Merger Proxy Statement and reduce the termination fee was a direct result of Plaintiff s lawsuit, the efforts of Plaintiff s counsel, and the negotiations between counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants. 4. Artesyn has agreed to pay the costs of notice to the class after its acquisition by Emerson so that the costs will be effectively borne by Emerson. V. RELEASE AND DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT If, after Notice and the Settlement Hearing provided for herein, the Court approves this Settlement, the Settling Parties shall jointly ask the Court to enter an Order and Final Judgment which will, among other things: a. find the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation to be fair, reasonable, adequate and finally approve it; b. certify the Settlement Class and find that Settlement Class Representative and Settlement Class Counsel have adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class with respect to the Action and the claims asserted therein; c. enter judgment pursuant to the Stipulation, among other things, dismissing the Action with prejudice; d. release all claims and rights, whether known or unknown, against the Defendants and their corresponding Released Parties, belonging to Plaintiff and any or all members of the putative class and their present or past heirs, executors, estates, administrators, predecessors, successors, assigns, parents, subsidiaries, associates, affiliates, employers, employees, agents, consultants, insurers, directors, managing directors, officers, partners, principals, members, attorneys, accountants, financial and other advisors, investment bankers, underwriters, lenders, and any other representatives of any of these persons and entities (including, without limitation, any claims, whether direct, derivative, representative or in any other capacity, arising under federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any law, rule or regulation, including the law of any jurisdiction outside the United States that relate in any way to any violation of state, federal or any foreign country s securities laws, any misstatement or omission, any breach of duty, any negligence or fraud (or any other alleged wrongdoing or misconduct and also relate in any way to the sale of Artesyn to Emerson, the fiduciary and other duties owed by Defendants to shareholders of Artesyn in connection therewith, Defendants disclosure obligations under federal, state or any other law in connection with the sale of Artesyn to Emerson, or any other claim related in any way to any of the foregoing (but excluding statutory claims for appraisal under Fla. Stat and the sections that follow and also claims to enforce this Settlement; and e. permanently bar and enjoin the Plaintiff and all members of the Settlement Class from asserting, commencing, prosecuting or continuing, either directly, indirectly, individually, representatively, or in any other capacity, any of the Settled Claims as against any and all Released Parties. VI. NOTICE TO BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES The Court has ordered that record holders of common stock of Artesyn included in the Settlement Class send this Notice to all beneficial owners of such stock within five (5 days after receipt of the Notice or send a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Notice Administrator within five (5 days of receipt of the Notice. You may obtain reimbursement of your reasonable and actual out-of-pocket disbursements that would not have been made but for this request by submitting an itemized statement to: Artesyn Technologies, Inc. Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Notice Administrator PO Box 9000 #6455 Merrick, NY
5 VII. ATTORNEY S FEES The Settling Parties have also agreed to settle the claim of Plaintiff s counsel for attorneys fees and expenses incurred in connection with this litigation. The Settling Parties have agreed that Defendants will, subject to Court approval, pay attorneys fees and expenses to Plaintiff s counsel of $475,000. These monies will not be paid by Artesyn shareholders or from monies that would have otherwise been paid to Artesyn shareholders. VIII. SETTLEMENT HEARING The Settlement Hearing will be held on October 20, 2006 at 8:30 a.m., at the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, 205 North Dixie Highway, Room: , Courtroom Number: 9C, West Palm Beach, Florida for the purpose of determining: (i whether the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided for in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, adequate and should be finally approved by the Court; (ii whether the Settlement Class should be finally certified and whether Settlement Class Representative and Settlement Class Counsel have adequately represented the interests of the Settlement Class with respect to the Action and the claims asserted therein; (iii whether the judgment should be entered pursuant to the Stipulation, among other things, dismissing the Action with prejudice; and (iv other matters relating to the proposed Settlement. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing or any adjournment thereof without further notice to members of the Settlement Class other than by announcement at the Hearing or any adjournment thereof. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement at or after the Settlement Hearing with such modification as may be consented to by the Settling Parties and without further notice to the Settlement Class. Any Settlement Class member may, but is not required to, appear at the Settlement Hearing in person or by counsel and be heard in support of, or in opposition to, the fairness, reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement. However, no Settlement Class Member shall be heard in opposition to the Settlement and no paper or brief submitted by any such person shall be received or considered by the Court unless no later than fourteen (14 days before the Settlement Hearing, that person shall file with the Clerk of this Court: (a a written notice of his, her or its intention to appear; (b proof that he, she or it is a Settlement Class Member; (c a written statement of the position he, she or it will assert; (d the reasons for his, her or its position; and (e all papers he, she or it intends to present to the Court in support of his, her or its position. In addition, such person must also file with the Clerk of this Court no later than fourteen (14 days before the Settlement Hearing a proof of service of such notice and papers upon the following: The Brualdi Law Firm Richard B. Brualdi, Esq. 29 Broadway 24 th Floor New York, NY Telephone: ( Counsel for Plaintiff HOLLAND & KNIGHT Tracy A. Nichols Louise Brais 701 Brickell Avenue Suite 3000 Miami, FL, Telephone: ( Counsel for Defendants Joseph M. O Donnell, Edward S. Croft, III, Lawrence J. Matthews, Stephen A. Ollendorff, Phillip A. O Reilly, Bert Sager, A. Eugene Sapp, Jr., Ronald D. Schmidt, Lewis Solomon, John M. Steel and Artesyn Technologies Inc. DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL Dennis E. Glazer Edmund Polubinski III 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY Telephone: ( Counsel for Emerson Electric Co. 5
6 Any person who fails to object in the manner provided above shall be deemed to have waived the right to object (including any right of appeal and shall be forever barred from raising such objection in this or any other action or proceeding. IX. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS This notice contains only a summary of the terms of the proposed Settlement. For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in these proceedings, you may refer to the Stipulation and the other papers on file with the Court in the Action. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE MAKE ALL INQUIRIES TO: Richard B. Brualdi, Esq. The Brualdi Law Firm 29 Broadway 24 th Floor New York, NY ( (toll free ( PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT DIRECTLY. Dated: July 31, DISTRIBUTED BY ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 6
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BRAD WIND, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-2380CI-20 CATALINA
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED
More informationIF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES Index No. 775000/2012 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,
More informationCase 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D
Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCAUSE NO. D-1-GN NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-13-000352 IN RE PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC, SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NOTICE OF PENDENCY
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 008835/2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION
In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CA XXXX MB AO
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA MICHAEL BLOCH, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 025312 XXXX
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IBEW LOCAL UNION 98, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, NOVEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., WAYNE P. YETTER, PETER BRANDT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document
More informationTHE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL
THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE REHABCARE GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 6197 - VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of Himself and All ) Case No. 98-009023-AI Others Similarly
More informationIn The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X
In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida MATILDA FRANZITTA, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AEROSONIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff vs. DAVID
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
ZLATOMIR VERGIEV, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, CARLOS E. AGUERO, MICHAEL J. DRURY, CARY M. GROSSMAN, SEAN P. DUFFY, PAUL A. GARRETT, BRET R. MAXWELL, TOTAL
More informationCase 1:12-cv TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 807 EXHIBIT C
Case 1:12-cv-01016-TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 807 EXHIBIT C Case 1:12-cv-01016-TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 808 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLMENT HEARING
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PETER ROSENBLUM, on behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. TEAVANA HOLDINGS, INC., ANDREW T. MACK, F. BARRON FLETCHER
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ROBERT WINN, JAMES WINN and MARVIN GILL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. IP00-0310
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY x JOANN KRAJEWSKI, PAUL Consolidated Case No. 02-CV-221038 MCHENDRY, and MICHAEL LAMB, Division No. 8 Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant
More informationNOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF MONROE ------------------------------------------------------------------------- X IN RE BAUSCH & LOMB INC. : BUYOUT LITIGATION : -------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
More informationTHE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION
THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID P. ANASTASI, et al., Lead Case No. 08-2-31902-4 SEA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A court in Nevada authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Please be advised that if you held the common stock of ClubCorp
More informationCase 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:14-cv-81156-WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO 4000 Justice Way, Suite 2009 Castle Rock, CO 80109 IN RE ADVANCED EMISSIONS SOLUTIONS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS
More informationCAUSE NO
CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW
SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv-20549-KMW SEARCHMEDIA HOLDINGS LTD.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:
Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Windstream Holdings, Inc. to whom its April 26, 2015 One-for-Six Reverse Stock Split Shares
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA J. WRIGHT WILLIAMSON and THEOPHILUS ) HERBST, JR., Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal ) Defendant THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., ) ) Case No. CJ 2002-1144
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M.
In re ITC HOLDINGS CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No. 2016-151852-CB Hon. James M. Alexander This Document
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE THE HONORABLE GREG CANOVA RICHARD CARRIGAN, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, ADVANCED DIGITAL INFORMATION CORPORATION,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION JAMES P. MORIARTY, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 99-0225 Civ - Moreno/Dube
More informationCase3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43
Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70
More informationCase 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD KRANTZ, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant CVS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, THOMAS M. RYAN, DAVID B. RICKARD, THOMAS P. GERRITY, STANLEY
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and Lead Case No. C-1-00-320 All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with No.
More informationIN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE In re PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master Docket
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF DERIVATIVE AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION. Consol. Case No
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION IN RE SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. BONDHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) ) Consol. Case No. 3-00-1145 17 NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED PARTIAL
More informationIN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR CARSON CITY 1 ALEX LOEB, Derivatively on Behalf of UNIVERSAL TRAVEL GROUP, vs. Plaintiff, JIANGPING JIANG, JING XIE, HUJIE GAO, JIDUAN
More informationPlaintiffs, NOTICE TO CURRENT ARCA STOCKHOLDERS
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: Other Civil DAVID GRAY and MICHAEL BOLLER, Derivatively and on Behalf of APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENTERS OF AMERICA,
More informationEXHIBITB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELA WARE
Case 1:17-cv-00869-RDM Document 33 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 765 Case 1:17-cv-00869-RDM Document 31-2 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1of20 PagelD #: 731 EXHIBITB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Landry s Restaurants, Inc.,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
JAMES SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION v. Plaintiff, TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 This Notice is being sent to let you know of the proposed
More informationBERGEN COUNTY. Docket No. BER-L EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE
In Re: Pascack Bancorp Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION BERGEN COUNTY Docket No. BER-L-7277-15 EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
More informationCAUSE NO. DC C
CAUSE NO. DC-13-06601-C JACOB HULSEBUS, IBEW LOCAL 363 PENSION TRUST FUND, IBEW LOCAL 363 MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN and PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION
IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L-6430-06 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CLASS CERTIFICATION, PROPOSED
More informationx : : x NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. SECURITIES LITIGATION x : : x No. CV 01-3285 (JBW) (MDG) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. C.A. No JLT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE CVS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : : X C.A. No. 01-11464 JLT NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE SYKES ENTERPRISES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Consolidated Civil Action Case No. 8:00-CV-212-T-26F THIS MATTER PERTAINS
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION
SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION SPENCER SAVAGE and YOUSEF BARAKAT, Derivatively on Behalf of ibio, INC., Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT B. KAY, ARTHUR Y. ELLIOTT, JAMES T.
More informationA Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
Case 2:05cv00204DB Document 1053 Red 11/07/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Exhibit B IN RE imergent SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No.: 2:05-cv-0204
More informationIN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
BRAD BERKOWITZ, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR SALT LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH Plaintiff, vs. SINO GAS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU. Index No CLASS ACTION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU PAULINE PHILLIPS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, RECKSON ASSOCIATES REALTY CORP., et al., Index No.
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION
GORDON D. LOBINS, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant RAIT FINANCIAL TRUST, v. Plaintiff, EDWARD S. BROWN, BETSY Z. COHEN, DANIEL G. COHEN, SCOTT L.N. DAVIDSON, FRANK A. FARNESI, KENNETH R. FRAPPIER,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIDDER PEABODY SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File Civil Action No. 94 Civ. 3954 (BSJ)(MHD) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,
More information: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY KENTON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 07-CI-00627
More informationCase 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1
Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 2 of 14 Exhibit A-1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION AMY COOK, derivatively on behalf of CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION, vs. Plaintiff, GARY E. MCCULLOUGH, STEVEN H. LESNIK, LESLIE
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated October 12, 2018 ( Stipulation
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively on Behalf of THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., v. Plaintiff, JOSE B. ALVAREZ, ALAN M. BENNETT,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET
More information: 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED ORDER CONCERNING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT BNL AND THE CREDIT SUISSE DEFENDANTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : In re PARMALAT SECURITIES : LITIGATION This document relates to: : : No. 04 Civ. 0030 (LAK) : : : MASTER FILE NO. : 04 MD 1653 (LAK) CORRECTED
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION HON. PATRICIA A. McINERNEY IN RE CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS MARCH TERM 2016 NO. 00217 NOTICE OF PENDENCY
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L
In re Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-4370-07 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8598-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE THOMAS D. KEELEY and LINDA TALLEY HEWITT, On ) Master Case File No. 737787 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) (Consolidated
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : :
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : : This Document Relates To: : ALL ACTIONS. : : x Master File No. 2:07-cv-03359-JS-GRB CLASS ACTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : :
x STANLEY YEDLOWSKI, etc., v. Plaintiffs, ROKA BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : Case No. 14-CV-8020-FLW-TJB NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC
More informationPlaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of
Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly
More information) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA TEAMSTERS LOCAL 443 HEALTH SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, v. Plaintiff, CLARENCE OTIS JR., MICHAEL W. BARNES, LEONARD L.
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CACE-15-001612 (02) LYNN PHILLIPS, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationA Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.
EFiled: Oct 20 2015 11:35AM EDT Transaction ID 58039964 Case No. 10553-VCN IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE NPS PHARMACEUTICALS STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No.
More informationCase 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161
Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
More information