Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
- Zoe Bailey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POWER PLAY 1 LLC, and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, NORFOLK TIDE BASEBALL CLUB, LLC A/K/A and/or D/B/A TIDES BASEBALL CLUB, L.P., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 17-CV-4831 COMPLAINT The Plaintiffs, Power Play 1 LLC and Admirals ECHL Hockey, LLC, by their attorneys, Morea Law LLC and Burns & Levinson LLP, complaining of the Norfolk Tide Baseball Club, LLC A/K/A and/or D/B/A Tides Baseball Club, L.P., upon information and belief, allege and state as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This is a civil action where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between citizens of different states. Federal jurisdiction therefore exists under 28 U.S.C At all relevant times: (a) Plaintiff Power Play 1 LLC ( Power Play ) is and was a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, with its main office and principal place of business located in Bronx, New York; (b) Power Play s high-level officers have been and are primarily located in New York, and such officers direct, control, and coordinate Power Play s activities primarily from its headquarters in New York; and (c) Power Play s
2 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 11 members reside in, and are and were, citizens of New York. Power Play is considered a citizen of New York for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C At all relevant times: (a) Plaintiff Admirals ECHL Hockey, LLC (the Operating Company ) (together with Power Play, the Plaintiffs ), is and was a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of Virginia, with its main office and principal place of business located in Norfolk, Virginia; (b) the Operating Company is and was a single member LLC, whose sole member is Power Play; and (c) Power Play s members reside and resided in, and are and were, citizens of New York. The Operating Company is considered a citizen of New York for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C At all relevant times Tides Baseball Club, L.P. is and was a Virginia limited partnership based in Norfolk, Virginia. Tides Baseball Club, L.P. is also known as and/or has done business as Norfolk Tide Baseball Club, LLC and, together, they are referred to herein as the Defendant. (Norfolk Tide Baseball Club, LLC held itself out as a Virginia LLC and executed the agreement by and among the parties giving rise to the present action (and related agreements) under that name.) The Defendant is considered a citizen of Virginia for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C As more fully set forth herein, the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant because at all relevant times: (a) the Defendant has and/or had sufficient minimum contacts with the forum as a result of contracting with Power Play in New York; and (b) the Defendant agreed and consented to exclusive jurisdiction in the federal and state courts of New York pursuant to a jurisdiction / venue clause in the agreement by and among the parties giving rise to the present action. 2
3 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 3 of 11 agreement. 7. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C and per the terms of the subject Nature of Action FACTS 8. The Plaintiffs seek damages from the Defendant arising from, and related to, the Defendant s misrepresentations in connection with and breaches of a certain agreement dated as of September 28, 2016 (the Agreement ), whereby the Defendant sold its interests in the Operating Company to Power Play. Power Play Acquires A Mid-Level Professional Hockey Team, The Norfolk Admirals, As Well As The Operating Company 9. Prior to September 30, 2016, KG (US) Oilers Corp. (the Edmonton Oilers ) owned an ECHL team based in Norfolk, Virginia named the Norfolk Admirals (the ECHL Team ). 10. Prior to September 30, 2016, the Defendant owned the Operating Company, which managed the ECHL Team for the Edmonton Oilers pursuant to a certain management services agreement dated October 1, 2015 (the MSA ). As part of the management services Defendant provided under the MSA, the Operating Company was responsible for acquiring and maintaining all equipment used in connection with the operation of the ECHL Team, namely all uniforms, hockey sticks, hockey pads, helmets, as well as all medical and training equipment used by the ECHL Team. Additionally, the Operating Company was also responsible for all back office needs of the ECHL. 11. After months of negotiation with the Edmonton Oilers in 2016, satisfying various ECHL league requirements, and securing the City of Norfolk s consent to the Edmonton Oiler s assignment of certain interests and assets to Power Play, Power Play acquired the ECHL Team 3
4 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 4 of 11 from the Edmonton Oilers. That acquisition was made pursuant to a certain September 30, 2016 Asset Purchase Agreement by and between the Edmonton Oilers and Power Play (the ECHL Team APA ). 12. Power Play agreed to and did pay the Edmonton Oilers substantial sums pursuant to the ECHL Team APA (the ECHL Team Purchase Price ). 13. Power Play agreed to and did pay the Edmonton Oilers the ECHL Team Purchase Price in reliance upon, among other material things, the Defendant s disclosures concerning obligations the Operating Company owed in connection with and on behalf of the ECHL Team, which Defendant disclosures the Edmonton Oilers were aware of and did not object to. The Defendant made such disclosures verbally and in writing on, among other occasions in September 2016, September 20, 21, 22 and 23, On September 30, 2016, the Edmonton Oilers terminated the MSA. 15. On September 30, 2016, Power Play, the Operating Company (then owned by Defendant) and Defendant entered into a certain Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by which the Defendant sold the Operating Company to Power Play (the MIPA ). A true and accurate copy of the MIPA is appended hereto as Exhibit 1. After September 30, 2016, The Plaintiffs Discovered That The Defendant Had Materially Misrepresented The Operating Company s Obligations, Converted Operating Team Monies And Property And Misappropriated The ECHL Team s Funds Through Comingling 16. Prior to Power Play s election to execute and actual execution of the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA, Power Play specifically requested from the Defendant, among other data, all Operating Company-related contracts. As the Edmonton Oilers and the Defendant knew, Power Play intended to use such data to determine (i) whether to proceed with the ECHL Team APA and MIPA and (ii) the corresponding purchase prices. 4
5 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 5 of The Defendant represented to Power Play, both affirmatively and via omission, that the Defendant had disclosed all data Power Play requested, including all Operating Companyrelated contracts. 18. After execution of the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA on September 30, 2016, the Plaintiffs discovered that the Defendant had failed to disclose certain Operating Companyrelated contracts. 19. After execution of the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA, the Plaintiffs also discovered that the Defendant had obligated the Operating Company to certain contracts with entities related to the Defendant and/or entities with which the Defendant had a beneficial relationship. One such undisclosed contract formed the basis of a lawsuit brought against the Operating Company in the Virginia Beach General District Court (the Landlord Suit ). Power Play was required to expend significant funds to defend the Operating Company in connection with the Landlord Suit. 20. In addition, after execution of the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA, the Plaintiffs discovered that the Defendant had converted Operating Company monies and property. More specifically, the Plaintiffs discovered that the Defendant converted monies that were to remain in the Operating Team bank accounts after the MIPA closing. The Plaintiffs also discovered that the Defendant had entered the ECHL Team s facility post-closing, uninvited, and removed certain merchandise and/or memorabilia that the Plaintiffs owned and had the right to possess by operation of the MIPA. The Defendant took the monies and merchandise and/or memorabilia intending to deprive the Plaintiffs of their rights to possess same. 21. Further yet, after execution of the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA, the Plaintiffs discovered that the Defendant, who also managed a minor league baseball team, had comingled 5
6 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 6 of 11 team monies and been running various baseball team-related expenses through the ECHL Team when managing for the Edmonton Oilers. By doing so, the Defendant misappropriated the ECHL Team s funds. Power Play would have been entitled to such funds by operation of the MIPA. Power Play Made Demand Upon The Defendant For Itself And The Operating Company 22. On February 3, 2017, and in accordance with the terms of the MIPA, Power Play demanded that the Defendant indemnify Power Play for, among others, damages the Plaintiffs suffered as direct and proximate result of the Defendant s failure to disclose all Operating Company-related contracts. At that time, Power Play demanded indemnification in the amount of $255, (exclusive of lost business opportunity and business impact-related damages). Via that February 3, 2017 correspondence, Power Play also demanded return of the converted monies and merchandise and/or memorabilia. A true and accurate copy of the February 3, 2017 demand is appended hereto as Exhibit On February 17, 2017, the Defendant rejected Power Play s demand for indemnification and refused to return Power Play s converted property. 24. On March 22, 2017, Power Play renewed its demand, amending the monetary indemnification component of the demand to $267, (exclusive of lost business opportunity and business impact-related damages). A true and accurate copy of the March 22, 2017 demand is appended hereto as Exhibit On May 18, 2017, the Defendant again rejected Power Play s full demand for indemnification. 26. Thus, on May 22, 2017, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of its intent to file suit and inquired, via their counsel, whether the Defendant s counsel was authorized to accept service of process. Defendant s counsel did not respond. Instead, and despite New York Federal and 6
7 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 7 of 11 State Courts having exclusive jurisdiction per the MIPA, on May 23, 2017, the Defendant filed an improper declaratory judgment action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Norfolk Division) in bad faith. 27. The Plaintiffs have been damaged by the Defendant in excess of $500,000 on account the undisclosed Operating Company-related contracts, the converted monies and merchandise and/or memorabilia, the Landlord Suit defense, lost business opportunity and business impact-related damages and incurred attorneys fees. 28. The Plaintiffs have satisfied all conditions precedent to filing this lawsuit. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Contract) 29. The Plaintiffs repeat each allegation in Paragraphs 1 through 28 of this Complaint as if each such allegation had been pleaded here in full. 30. The Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against the Defendant for all Losses -- as such term is defined by the MIPA -- that they each and/or jointly suffered as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s breach of the MIPA, which Losses total in excess of $500,000 (the exact amount of which continues to accrue and will be determined at trial), plus interest from September 30, SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing) 31. The Plaintiffs repeat each allegation in Paragraphs 1 through 30 of this Complaint as if each such allegation had been pleaded here in full. 32. The controlling law recognizes an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract. 33. The Defendant has violated the duty of good faith and fair dealing inherent in the 7
8 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 8 of 11 MIPA in the manners described above, and has damaged the Plaintiffs in manners separate and distinct from those harms it caused by breaching the MIPA itself. 34. The Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against the Defendant for all damages that they each and/or jointly suffered as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s breach of the subject implied covenant, which damages continue to accrue and will be determined at trial, plus interest from September 30, THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Conversion) 35. Plaintiffs repeat each allegation in Paragraphs 1 through 34 of this Complaint as if each such allegation had been pleaded here in full. memorabilia. 36. The Defendant converted the aforementioned monies and merchandise and/or 37. The value of the converted monies is $53, The value of the converted merchandize and/or memorabilia is $10, The damages the Plaintiffs suffered as a direct and proximate result of the subject conversion are separate and distinct from those harms caused by the Defendant s breach of the MIPA itself. 40. The Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against the Defendant for all damages that they each and/or jointly suffered as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s conversion, the principle amount totaling $63,892, plus interest from October 11, FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Misrepresentation / Fraud) 41. Plaintiffs repeat each allegation in Paragraphs 1 through 40 of this Complaint as if each such allegation had been pleaded here in full. 8
9 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 9 of The Defendant misrepresented to Power Play the type, number and scope of the Operating Company-related contracts and Operating Company-related obligations that Plaintiffs would assume after the parties closed on the MIPA. 43. The Defendants committed such misrepresentations both affirmatively (e.g., in discussions, s, and pre-closing data exchanges) and via omission (e.g., by failing to disclose altogether). 44. The misrepresentations were material in terms of dollar value and being key to Power Play s election to close on the ECHL Team APA at the ECHL Team Purchase Price and close on the MIPA generally. 45. The Defendant, who had superior knowledge of the Operating Company s obligations, knew that its affirmative representations were false at the time Defendant made them. 46. The Defendant elected to purposefully omit certain Operating Company-related contracts and Operating Company-related obligations from its disclosures to Power Play. 47. The Defendant made its misrepresentations intending to defraud Power Play or otherwise conceal material matters that, if known to Power Play, would have impacted the ECHL Team APA and MIPA negotiations materially. 48. Having received the Defendant s repeated assurance that the Defendant had disclosed all Operating Company-related contracts and obligations, Power Play reasonably relied on the Defendant s (then unknown) misrepresentations and proceeded with the ECHL Team APA and the MIPA. 49. The Plaintiffs have been damaged by the Defendant s misrepresentations in two primary manners. First, but for the Defendant s misrepresentations, Power Play would not have closed on the ECHL Team APA at the ECHL Team Purchase Price. In essence, the Defendant s 9
10 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 10 of 11 misrepresentations caused Power Play to over pay for the ECHL Team. Second, but for the Defendant s misrepresentations, Power Play would not have entered into the MIPA and subjected itself and the Operating Company to unforeseen obligations associated with the undisclosed Operating Company-related contracts, some of which have resulted in vendor disputes like the Landlord Suit. 50. The Defendant s misrepresentations and/or fraud has damaged the Plaintiffs in manners separate and distinct from those harms caused by the Defendant s breach of the MIPA itself. 51. The Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against the Defendant for all damages that they each and/or jointly suffered as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant s misrepresentation and/or fraud, which damages continue to accrue and will be determined at trial, plus interest from September 30, WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendant as follows: A. On the first, second, third and fourth causes of action, in the principle amount(s) to be proven at trial, plus the appropriate interest thereon; B. The costs, attorneys fees and disbursements of this action; and C. Such further relief as justice requires. 10
11 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 11 of 11 Dated: June 27, 2017 Respectfully submitted, POWER PLAY 1 LLC and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC By its attorneys, /s/ Michael N. Morea Michael N. Morea Morea Law LLC 345 Route 17, Suite 31 Upper Saddle River, NJ p: f: michael.morea@morealaw.com Thomas T. Reith, BBO # (pro hac vice pending) treith@burnslev.com Laura Lee Mittelman, BBO # (pro hac vice pending) lmittelman@burnslev.com BURNS & LEVINSON LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA Tel Fax
12 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 32
13 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 2 of 32
14 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 3 of 32
15 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 4 of 32
16 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 5 of 32
17 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 6 of 32
18 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 7 of 32
19 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 8 of 32
20 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 9 of 32
21 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 10 of 32
22 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 11 of 32
23 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 12 of 32
24 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 13 of 32
25 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 14 of 32
26 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 15 of 32
27 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 16 of 32
28 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 17 of 32
29 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 18 of 32
30 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 19 of 32
31 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 20 of 32
32 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 21 of 32
33 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 22 of 32
34 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 23 of 32
35 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 24 of 32
36 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 25 of 32
37 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 26 of 32
38 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 27 of 32
39 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 28 of 32
40 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 29 of 32
41 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 30 of 32
42 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 31 of 32
43 Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 1-1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 32 of 32
Case 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:12-cv-10578 Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NEW ENGLAND CONFECTIONERY COMPANY, INC., v. Plaintiff, ALLIED INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00978 Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WOODLAND DRIVE LLC 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 v. Plaintiff, JAMES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationEBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS ) CASE No.: SIMILARLY SITUATED, ) 7 ) 8 Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION vs. ) COMPLAINT 9 ) FOR VIOLATIONS
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:17-cv-07647-WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X Civil Action No. JAMES WHITELEY, COMPLAINT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:09-cv-06070-WJM-MF Document 1 Filed 12/01/09 Page 1 of 16 MINTZ & GOLD LLP Steven G. Mintz (SM 5428) Andrew P. Napolitano (APN 3272) 470 Park Avenue South 10 th Floor North New York, N.Y. 10016-6819
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT. ) [Unlimited Jurisdiction] ) ) Case No.:
SINGH, SINGH & TRAUBEN, MICH AEL A. T RAUBEN (SBN: 00 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 00 Beverly Hills, California 0 Tel: --0 Fax: -- mtrauben@singhtraubenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs SANDBOX LLC and JUSTIN
More informationCase 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27
Case 2:06-cv-02163-JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27 HELLRING LINDEMAN GOLDSTEIN & SIEGAL LLP Stephen L. Dreyfuss, Esq. sldreyfuss@hlgslaw.com One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5386
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE RICK HARTMAN, individually and on : CIVIL ACTION NO. behalf of all others similarly situated, : : CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff, : FOR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT
Ira M. Press KIRBY McINERNEY LLP 825 Third Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 371-6600 Facsimile: (212) 751-2540 Email: ipress@kmllp.com Counsel for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationDENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI
CAUSE NO. C-0166-17-H DENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI Defendants. HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL
More informationCase 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:19-cv-00070-DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHARLES MASIH, INDIVIDUALLY and ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:17-cv-06654 Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Ernest Moore, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, -v- 33 Union
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:17-cv-01320 Document 1 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP James C. Shah Natalie Finkelman Bennett 475 White Horse Pike Collingswood, NJ 08107 Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, LULULEMON ATHLETICA, INC., LAURENT POTDEVIN and STUART C. HASELDEN,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 10:56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO. 651899/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, BRUKER CORPORATION, FRANK H. LAUKIEN, and ANTHONY L. MATTACCHIONE, Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PLAINTIFF, In His Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, FRANCISCO D SOUZA,
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. NOW COMES the Plaintiffs and as Complaint against the above-named Defendants aver SUMMARY OF CLAIMS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Claude Williams and Glennie Williams ) Individually and on behalf of all ) similarly situated individuals, ) )
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:12-cv-00137 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/08/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JUAN DORADO, ) CASE: 12cv137 MICHAEL MARKZON, ) PLAINTIFFS,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case -cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID # 0 0 Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) POMERANTZ LLP North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 00 Telephone (0) -0 E-mail jpafiti@pomlaw.com POMERANTZ LLP Jeremy A. Lieberman
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationCase KRH Doc 1 Filed 06/22/16 Entered 06/22/16 17:28:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Debtors. 5 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH
More informationCase 3:18-cv BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:18-cv-00776-BAJ-RLB Document 1 08/17/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHEVRON TCI, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 18-776 ) CAPITOL HOUSE HOTEL MANAGER,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-01025-RHK-LIB Document 7 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Ellering; Karen Ellering; Select Associates Realty, LLC; EJK, Inc., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, I COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS.
Case 3:-cv-00980-SI Document Filed 02/29/ Page of 2 3 4 8 9 0 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2 22 2 2 vs. HORTONWORKS, INC., ROBERT G. BEARDEN, and SCOTT J. DAVIDSON,
More informationCase 2:18-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1
Case 2:18-cv-17206-JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 GREGG F. PASTER & ASSOCIATES Gregg F. Paster, Esq. (GP0977) 530 Sylvan Avenue-Suite 201 Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 201-489-0078
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :44 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x NUE RESOURCE FUNDING, LLC, Index No.: 650454/2016 a New Jersey Limited
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:18-cv-01903 Document 1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENNETH TRAVERS, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE 1716-CV12857 Case Type Code: TI Sharon K. Martin, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. WINDOW VISIONS,
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINIOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:18-cv-01039 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINIOIS EASTERN DIVISION LEONARD SOKOLOW, on Behalf of Himself and All Others
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 4:11-cv-00346 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/26/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION F. B. LACY V. CA REPUTABLE RARE COINS, LLC and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00450 Document 1 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFREY A. LOVITKY Attorney at Law 1776 K Street N.W. Washington D.C. 20006 Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv WAL-GWC Document #: 1 FãHed: /12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST.
Case: 1:12-cv-00054-WAL-GWC Document #: 1 FãHed: 0512 5/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ST. CROIX DIVISION MING YANG, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY CASE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP JOHN T. JASNOCH (CA 0) jjasnoch@scott-scott.com 00 W. Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile:
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-00392 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DARRYL AUSTIN, CASE NO: PLAINTIFF VS. JURY DEMAND JAY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, STEPHEN A. WYNN, and CRAIG SCOTT BILLINGS, Defendants.
More informationCase 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-11392-GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEAH MIRABELLA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 13-cv-11392
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com Victoria C. Knowles, Bar No. vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com
More informationCase 1:13-cv JBS-JS Document 1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:13-cv-07585-JBS-JS Document 1 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 NORMA D. THIEL, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY v. RIDDELL, INC. ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More informationCase 6:12-cv TC Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 1
Case 6:12-cv-00667-TC Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#: 1 Anne D. Foster, OSB No. 993152 Email: afoster@dunncarney.com DUNN CARNEY ALLEN HIGGINS & TONGUE LLP 851 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 1500
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division Civil Action No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division Civil Action No. x : G. PEREZ, J. PEREZ and : M. SOSA, : CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT : Plaintiffs, : DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
More informationCase 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 5 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 22
Case 2:16-cv-05243-SDW-LDW Document 5 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 22 COLE SCHOTZ P.C. Court Plaza North 25 Main Street P.O. Box 800 Hackensack, New Jersey 07602-0800 201-489-3000 201-489-1536 Facsimile
More informationCase 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:14-cv-02223-L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 1:16-cv-00454-WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI PATRICIA WILSON, on behalf of herself and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B., EMILIO FERNANDO AZCÁRRAGA JEAN and SALVI RAFAEL
More informationCase 1:18-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:18-cv-09820-PGG Document 1 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAUL GARCIA, on behalf of himself, FLSA Collective Plaintiffs and the Class, Case
More informationLaw Offices of Howard G. Smith
0 0 LIONEL Z. GLANCY (#0) ROBERT V. PRONGAY (#0) LESLEY F. PORTNOY (#0) CHARLES H. LINEHAN (#0) GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:
More informationCase KRH Doc 1 Filed 06/22/16 Entered 06/22/16 16:42:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Debtors. 8 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH
More informationmuia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:15cv-05921DSF-FFM Document 1 fled 08/05/15 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1 1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) 2 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071 4 Telephone:
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:17-cv-08593 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/28/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BRADLEY WEST, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13180-RGS Document 1 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Battle Construction Co., Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationPlaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:
FELLNER v. TRI-UNION SEAFOODS, L.L.C. Doc. 28 EICHEN LEVINSON & CRUTCHLOW, LLP 40 Ethel Road Edison, New Jersey 08817 (732) 777-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBORAH FELLNER, vs. Plaintiff, TRI-UNION SEAFOODS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Cleveland Browns Football Company LLC v. Telantis Group Corporation Doc. 1 Case 1:07-cv-02648-PAG Document 1 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed // Page of POMERANTZ LLP Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: () - E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com - additional counsel on signature page - UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COUSINS SUBS SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) BETTER SUBS DEVELOPMENT, INC., ) BETTER SUBS RESTAURANTS, LLC, )
More informationCase: 1:06-cv Document #: 20 Filed: 11/08/06 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:127
Case: 1:06-cv-04481 Document #: 20 Filed: 11/08/06 Page 1 of 29 PageID #:127 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DR. LEONARD E. SALTZMAN, KENT EUBANK,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0) rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN ) sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0) bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.:
JAMAAL ANDERSON, JACOB BELL, DERRICK GAFFNEY, TAVARES GOODEN, FRANK GORE, SANTONIO HOLMES, GREG JONES, JEVON KEARSE, KENARD LANG, RAY LEWIS, BRANDON MERIWEATHER, SANTANA MOSS, CLINTON PORTIS, LITO SHEPPARD,
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff Said Hakim (Plaintiff) by his attorneys, Law Offices of Ian L. Blant, and
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SAID HAKIM, and SAID HAKIM on behalf of RANELL FREEZE COMPANY, and SAID HAKIM on behalf of RANELL FREEZE CORPORATION, Against Plaintiffs, KAMRAN
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Case 114-cv-08406-VSB Document 40 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, IOD INCORPORATED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC., JOHN R. O ROURKE III, and JEFFREY G. McGONEGAL, v. Plaintiff, Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com 00 Newport Place, Ste. 00 Newport Beach,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON ELECTRONICALLY FILED FIFTH THIRD BANK 250 West Main Street Lexington, Kentucky 40507 Plaintiff, ZAYAT STABLES, LLC
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.
Case 1:17-cv-09635 Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 Justin Cilenti (GC 2321) Peter H. Cooper (PHC 4714) CILENTI & COOPER, PLLC 708 Third A venue - 6 1 h Floor New York, NY 10017 T. (212) 209-3933
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JUDIE BATT YARNELL, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2017-CA-004914 JARED N. QUARTELL, ESQ., an individual,
More informationCase 1:17-cv DJC Document 1 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:17-cv-10922-DJC Document 1 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) RONALD HEBERT and ) Case No. AIME DENAULT On Behalf Of ) Themselves and Others
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@trialnewport.com Richard H. Hikida, Bar No. rhikida@trialnewport.com David
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:17-cv-00751-R Document 1 Filed 07/13/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MATTHEW W. LEVERETT, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ARNOLD E. WEBB JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No.: Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:16-cv-09169 Document 1 Filed 11/27/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Wanda Rosario-Medina, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00248-KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 FILED 2013 Feb-05 PM 12:07 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ZUCKER FEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:14-CV-4298 ) HOLIDAY IMAGE, LLC, ) ) Serve: ) Corporate Service Bureau
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-05069 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BARTOSZ GRABOWSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/2016 10:52 AM INDEX NO. 154973/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase 2:16-cv RFB-GWF Document 4 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 12
Case :-cv-0-rfb-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of 0 BLOCK & LEVITON LLP Jeffrey C. Block, Esq. (pro hac vice application to be filed) Joel A. Fleming, Esq. (pro hac vice application to be filed) Federal Street,
More informationLAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH Howard G. Smith 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112 Bensalem, PA Telephone: (215) Facsimile: (215)
1 1 1 1 LIONEL Z. GLANCY MICHAEL GOLDBERG ROBERT V. PRONGAY ELAINE CHANG GLANCY BINKOW & GOLDBERG LLP Century Park East, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: () 1- Facsimile: () 1-0 Email: info@glancylaw.com
More informationFiling # E-Filed 01/31/ :35:29 PM
Filing # 51875490 E-Filed 01/31/2017 03:35:29 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SHARON MEMMER, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationCAUSE NUMBER PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGNAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CAUSE NUMBER 2018-51603 STERLING GREEN COMMUNITY IN THE DISTRICT COURT IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, vs. 55 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DOROTHY MALVEAUX Defendant. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S FIRST
More informationCase 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN, JACKSON, FAIRCHILD & WADE, LLP Gillian L. Wade, Bar No. gwade@milsteinadelman.com 00 Constellation Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel:
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER
RICHARD T. BAUM State Bar No. 0 0 West Olympic Boulevard Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Tel: ( -0 Fax: ( - Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION KERRY INMAN, on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, INTERACTIVE MEDIA MARKETING, INC. and
More informationCase 2:15-cv APG-PAL Document 1 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-apg-pal Document Filed 0// Page of HAROLD P. GEWERTER, ESQ. E-filed: June, Nevada Bar No. ELAINE DOWLING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 GEWERTER & DOWLING S. Casino Center Las Vegas, Nevada Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JUSTIN ELLINGTON, Plaintiff, v. FIRST PREMIER BANK, Defendant. FIRST PREMIER BANK, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. CASSANDRA WHITAKER,
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-02143 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/26/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE SANCHEZ, on behalf of himself and all
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) E.D. Case No.
Case :0-cv-00-JAM-DAD Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 GREGORY T. MEATH (State Bar No. 0 MEATH & PEREIRA 0 North Sutter Street, Suite 00 Stockton, CA 0- Ph. (0-00 Fx. (0-0 greggmeath@hotmail.com Attorneys
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARGARET WARD and TROY WARD, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, v. AMERICAN HONDA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/2016 01:39 PM INDEX NO. 155249/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016 BAKER, LESHKO, SALINE & DRAPEAU, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs One North Lexington Avenue
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, 09051002 STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No. v.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
JOHN S. CARROLL 649-0 810 Richards Street, Suite 810 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone No. (808 526-9111 Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ERNEST Y. INADA
More informationCase 1:08-cv JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:08-cv-05668-JHR -KMW Document 37 Filed 05/04/09 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 222 Mark D. Mailman, I.D. No. MDM 1122 John Soumilas, I.D. No. JS 0034 FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. Land Title Building, 19 th Floor
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:
Case 1:18-cv-08406 Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IDA LOBELLO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.:
More informationCase 3:16-cv LB Document 1 Filed 06/11/16 Page 1 of 14
Case :-cv-0-lb Document Filed 0// Page of MICHAEL A. SCHAPS (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. SCHAPS Third Street, Suite B Davis, CA Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - mschaps@michaelschaps.com Attorney for
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No.
Case 1:17-cv-04559 Document 1 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COTR INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. MAKEUP ERASER GROUP, LLC (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
More information