V. CASE NO CA-00669
|
|
- Arabella Harris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. APPELLANT V. CASE NO CA PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI REPLY OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED Matthew P. Kidder (MS B~ Joe R. Norton, IV (MS Bar~ KIDDER AND NORTON. PLLC 121 South Railroad Ave. Suite 203 Brookhaven, MS Telephone: (601) Telephone: (601)
2 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. APPELLANT V. CASE NO CA PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Justices of the Supreme Court and/or the Judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal: 1. JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR.; AppellantlDefendant 2. PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT; AppelleelPlaintiff 3. MATTHEW P. KIDDER (MS Bar #101822) and JOE R. NORTON, IV (MS Bar #103309); KIDDER AND NORTON, PLLC, 121 South Railroad Ave., Suite 203, Brookhaven, MS 39601; Attorneys for Appellant 4. WILLIAM D. BOERNER (MS Bar #3610); BOERNER LAw FIRM, P.C., P.O. Box 205, Brookhaven, MS 39602; Attorney for Appellee ~~~/Y~ MA HEVV'P. KIDDER 1
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS... i TABLE OF CONTENTS... ii TABLE OF CASES, STATUTES AND AUTHORITIES CITED...iii SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT...1 ARGUMENT... 2 I. The order from the April 14, 2011 trial (entered on June 29, 2011) was a final, appealable order which addressed all matters pertaining to the parties, and should not be dismissed....2 II. In the alternative, should this Court find that the April 14, 2011 decision did not dispose of all claims of all the parties, the express language used by the lower court satisfies Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b)... 5 III. Without waiving Appellant's Motion to Strike Appellee's argument of matters outside of the record, the August 9, 2011 was not a continuation of the April14, 2011 trial, and did not render it moot... 6 CONCLUSION... 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 9 ii
4 TABLE OF CASES. STATUTES. AND AUTHORITIES CITED Cases: W M.F. v. D. D. F., 926 So. 2d 897 (Miss. 2006)... 6 McMurry v. Sadler, 846 SO.2d 240 (Miss.Ct.App. 2002)... 7 Statutes and Rules: Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b) iii
5 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT I. The April 14, 2011 was a final, appealable order, and David's appeal should not be dismissed. II. In the alternative, should this court find that the April 14, 2011 decision did not dispose of all claims of all the parties, the express language used by the lower court satisfies Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b). III. Without waiving Appellant's Motion to Strike Rena's argument of matters outside of the record, the August 9, 2011 was not a continuation of the April 14, 2011 trial, and did not render it moot. I
6 ARGUMENT I. THE ORDER FROM THE APRIL 14,2011 TRIAL (ENTERED ON JUNE 29,2011) WAS A FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER WHICH ADDRESSED ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE PARTIES, AND SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. In David's Petition for Modification of Child Custody, filed on January 18,2011, he did request temporary relief: 11. Due to dire and necessitous circumstances, James David Bryant, Jr., Petitioner herein, requests an immediate temporary hearing to ensure the safety of the children and to temporarily grant him physical and legal custody of said minor children until this matter can be finally heard on the merits as Pamela Rena Smith Bryant is expected to remain incarcerated or otherwise unavailable due to long term drug and alcohol treatment, either through Mississippi Department of Corrections or at a private facility. R. vol. 2, ; Appellant's R. E. 4 (emphasis added). The "immediate temporary hearing to ensure the safety of the children" was set for hearing on January 26, The temporary hearing was not held. The parties made an agreement on where the children would live while Rena was living at New Life Rehabilitation Center. This agreement was referenced at the April 14, 2011 trial: The Court: Was there some agreement reached on where the children would live while Ms. Bryant went to New Life? Mr. Boerner: According to Mr. Kidder, yes. The Court: Who reached that agreement? Mr. Kidder: Your Honor, it's my understanding that my client was not a party to it. Mr. Bryant: May I speak, your Honor? I asked to take care of them while she was there. I was told no, that I could get them on my weekends. She made the arrangements for them to stay with her parents. I offered again to help out, you know, as much as I could. So far we've stuck to the normal, every other weekend. And she stayed with them. That was not- I wanted to take care of them while she was gone, until she got back. 2
7 R. vol. 3, This agreement satisfied and made null paragraph 11 in David's Petition for Modification of Child Custody. The issue of "temporary custody" was resolved and no longer pending, as the issue of the safety of the children was resolved. A trial on the merits of the Petition for Modification of Custody was set for February 16, R. vol. 2, 230. On February 16, 2011 Rena's attorney, William Boerner, made his appearance in court, and petitioned the lower court for a continuance of the trial. Judge Walker granted his petition and entered and Order Continuing Case and Resetting for Trial, setting a new date for trial on April14, R. vol. 2, 248. The April 14, 2011 trial was divided into a bifurcated hearing to determine whether there was a substantial material change in circumstances adverse to the children's interests, and if such a change existed, the court was to hear evidence regarding the best interests of the children. R. vol. 3,17; Appellant's R. E. 6. At the conclusion of the fust phase of trial, Rena presented her motion to dismiss to the court. R. vol. 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. Granting her motion, Judge Walker determined that there was no a material change adverse to the children to warrant a change in custody from the July 2, 2009 custody decree, and that the July 2, 2009 custody decree was still in effect. R. vol. 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. David argues that the lower court disposed of all of the claims in his Petition for Modification of Child Custody, and that the April 14, 2011 decision was a final, appealable order. R. vol ; Appellant's R. E. 4. Judge Walker found: The Court, at this point, is not convinced there's been a material change in circumstances adverse to the health and well-being of the minor children in the home of the custodial parent, such that a change in custody is necessary. R. vol. 3, Ill; Appellant's R. E. 6. Under the terms of joint legal and physical custody, they both have joint custody ofthe child, of the children here. I'm not modifying it or changing it at this point. 3
8 R. vol. 3, 116; Appellant's R. E. 6. The parties have agreed for them to have joint physical custody and I haven't seen anything that would change, as far as material change in circumstances, that would change that at this point. R. vol. 3,118; Appellant's R. E. 6. But I'm not fmding there's a material change in circumstances in the matter. Just like I said earlier. R. vol. 3, 122; Appellant's R. E. 6. Judge Walker granted Rena's Motion to Dismiss, thereby ending the April 14, 2011 trial on David's Petition for Modification of Custody. After the lower court dismissed David's Petition for Modification of Child Custody, Judge Walker ruled that because of the impossibility of enforcing the July 2nd, 2009 custody decree (that the children reside predominately with Rena), the children would reside predominately with David until Rena completed her drug rehabilitation treatment. R. vol. 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. Judge Walker recognized that because of Rena was currently living in a drug rehabilitation facility, it was impossible for the children to reside with her, stating: At this point, it does not appear that the children can reside with the plaintiff because she is not living in a place that will provide for the children to live there... It's an impossibility at this point [for the children] to live with mom. An impossibility. R. vol. 3, 112, 118; Appellant's R. E. 6. Judge Walker also had lengthy legal argument with Rena's counsel addressing the temporary nature of the modification put in place. R. vol. 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. Despite Rena's argument against allowing the children to reside with David while she was in rehab, the Chancellor again reiterated the impossibility of enforcing the July 2, 2009 decree as written: But it's impossible right now to do that order like that. Is it not? Now, how in the world could I leave that order in place like that with her at New Life [rehabilitation facility]? Where would the children stay?.. And that's what I'm 4
9 doing now. I'm enforcing the order in that I'm letting the children- they still have joint physical custody of the children. But while she's in rehab the children are going to reside with Mr. Bryant. R. vo!' 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. final order: Rena's counsel attempted to persuade Judge Walker that his decision was not a Mr. Boerner: Judge, all I would ask is that whatever order we draft, would specifically recognize that the Court maintains jurisdiction of all of this and that it's not a final permanent order. The Court: Let me tell you something. I'm going to tell you at this point, it is a fmal order which either one of you can appeal, as far as that goes. R. vo!' 3, 120. Appellant's R. E. 6. Rena continued her argument that this was not a final order, and Judge Walker again stated "the order is final enough that if you want to appeal it, you are welcome to appeal this order that I'm entering now." R. vo!' 3, ; Appellant's R. E. 6. The court then directed David's counsel to enter the order stating: The Court: Mr. Norton, if you will prepare the order and send it to Mr. Boerner for his signature one way or the other. Mr. Norton: Your Honor, I will be glad to prepare it. The Court: Then he doesn't have to agree to it, but as to form and content. R. vo!' 3, 129. The April 14, 2011 was a fmal, appealable order, which disposed of all ofthe claims of the parties, and David's appeal should not be dismissed. II. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SHOULD THIS COURT FIND THAT THE APRIL 14,2011 DECISION DID NOT DISPOSE OF ALL CLAIMS OF ALL THE PARTIES, THE EXPRESS LANGUAGE USED BY THE LOWER COURT SATISFIES MISS. R. CIV. P. 54(B). In the alternative, David argues that pursuant to Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b) the court made an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and an express decision for the entry of judgment. The comment to Miss. R. Civ. P 54(b) states: 5
10 If the court decides that an order that does not dispose of all the claims of all the parties and that is not appealable under any other statute or rule should be given the status of a [mal judgment, Rule 54(b) requires it to take two separate steps before an appeal can be perfected. The court must make 'an express determination that there is no just reason for delay' and it must make 'an express decision for the entry of judgment.' Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b) cmt. As discussed supra, Judge Walker stated: Let me tell you something. I'm going to tell you at this point, it is a [mal order which either one of you can appeal, as far as that goes... the order is [mal enough that if you want to appeal it, you are welcome to appeal this order that I'm entering now... Mr. Norton, if you will prepare the order and send it to Mr. Boemer for his signature one way or the other... Then he doesn't have to agree to it, but as to form and content. R. vol. 3, ; 129; Appellant's R. E. 6. The Supreme Court, in M W F. v. D. D. F., held that the chancellor's temporary order did "not use the specific and express language required by Miss. R Civ. P. 54(b)... in a definite unmistakable manner." 926 So. 2d 897, 900 (Miss. 2006). However, in this case, Judge Walker's language is specific, express, and unmistakable. Therefore, the requirements of Miss. R. Civ. P. 54(b) are satisfied. III. WITHOUT WAIVING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE RENA'S ARGUMENT OF MATTERS OUTSIDE OF THE RECORD, THE AUGUST 9, 2011 WAS NOT A CONTINUATION OF THE APRIL 14,2011 TRIAL, AND DID NOT RENDER IT MOOT Appellant has a pending Motion to Strike Appellee Pamela Rena Smith Bryant's references to matters outside the scope of the record in this appeal before this Court, and without waiving his argument or any rights, will address Rena's assertion that the August 9, 2011 hearing renders moot the lower court's April 14,2011 decision. The lower court granted Rena's motion to dismiss David's Petition for Modification of Child Custody on April 14,2011. David had no other motion, petition, or any other document pending in the lower court. Rena filed a Motion, notifying the Court that Rena had completed drug-rehabilitation care at New Life and that Rena 6
11 is able and fit to maintain custody (paragraph 3) pursuant to the July 2, 2009 custody decree (in paragraph beginning with "WHEREFORE..."). Appellee's R. E. 8. Rena now argues that this hearing was a continuance of the April, 14, 2011 hearing. However, at the April 14, 2011 hearing, the lower court granted her motion to dismiss David's Petition for Modification of Child Custody. Therefore, David could not argue for a modification of child custody, nor could he put on evidence of a material change of circumstances or adverse effect, because he had no pending motion before the court. Furthermore, Rena's Motion did not properly plead the three-part test for modification of custody as required by Mississippi law. The Mississippi Court of Appeals properly dismissed a mother's petition for failure to state a claim because she did not properly plead the three-part test. McMurry v. Sadler, 846 So.2d 240, 244 (Miss.Ct.App. 2002). Finally, while Rena did attach a transcript of the lower court's ruling, she did not submit to this Court a transcript of the whole hearing. If she would have, this Court would have been able to read Judge Walker's statements concerning why the parties were in court on that day. To the best of Appellant's counsel's recollection, Rena's counsel argued to the court that the parties were there to proceed on an Albright analysis. To the best of Appellant's counsel's recollection, Judge Walker corrected Rena's counsel on record, stating that the parties were there to determine whether or not Rena was able to resume custody pursuant to the july 2, 2009 custody decree, and not for a modification of custody. For the foregoing reasons, Rena's arguments concerning the August 9, 2011 hearing hold no weight, and have no bearing on David's appeal. CONCLUSION The lower court's April 14, 2011 ruling was a final, appealable order, which David properly appealed from. The August 9, 2011 hearing and documentation relating to it is a matter 7
12 outside ofthe record, and is addressed in David's Motion to Strike. Without waiving any rights pertaining to the Motion to Strike, David argues that the August 9, 2011 has no bearing on his appeal. He respectfully prays for this Court to rule accordingly, and for any other relief this Court deems proper. This the I a t4 day of April, Respectfully submitted, JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. By: ryl~f. '~ Matthew P. Kidder (MS B Joe R. Norton, IV (MS Bar KIDDER AND NORTON. t'lll 121 South Railroad Ave. Suite 203 Brookhaven, MS Telephone: (601) Telephone: (601)
13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Matthew P. Kidder, do hereby certify that I have this date caused to be served via first class mail, electronic mail, and/or by hand delivery, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing pleading to: William D. Boerner, Esq. Boerner Law Firm, P.C. P.O. Box 205 Brookhaven, MS Attorney for Appellee Hon. Joe Dale Walker Lawrence County Chancery Judge P.O. Box 909 Monticello, MS And all other known counsel of record. This the lel'6ay of April, ~tild-/?t~ MATTHEW P. KIDDER 9
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DA YID BRYANT, JR. V. PAMELA RENA SMITH BRYANT -e: APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CA-00669 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS
More informationE-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.
E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,
More informationPlease complete the form by typing or printing legibly in black ink.
Re: Petition to Terminate Temporary Guardianship of Minor This form is to be used when a natural guardian seeks to terminate a temporary guardianship pursuant to changes made in O.C.G.A. 29-4-4.1(c, which
More informationE-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006
E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES ALBERT WIGGINS VS. BILLY RAY PERRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2006-CA-01126 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED LINDSEY C. MEADOR MEADOR & CRUMP P.O.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF SIMPSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT MARILYN NEWSOME
E-Filed Document Oct 26 2015 16:36:29 2015-CA-00762 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHIP OF VICTORIA D. NEWSOME: MARILYN NEWSOME, APPELLANT CA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SYLVESTER YOUNG, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-2026 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT VS. LUCIANA GASCON CURTIS PALCULICT APPELLANT CAUSE NO.: 2007-CA-019S4 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF: Th'"E STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. LAWRENCE BROWDER, APPELLEE CAUSE NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF: Th'"E STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Y-D LUMBER COMPANY, INC, APPELLANT VS. LAWRENCE BROWDER, APPELLEE -~. CAUSE NO. 2007-CA-01388 APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationv. CAUSE NO CA-01920
E-Filed Document Jun 16 2014 16:40:22 2013-CA-01920-SCT Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PINNACLE TRUST COMPANY, L.L.C., EFP ADVISORS INC. AND DOUGLAS M. McDANIEL APPELLANTS
More informationAPPELLANT'S BRIEF. Case No CA ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI RHONDA B. (KITTRELL) FARRIOR APPELLANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2007-CA-01868 RHONDA B. (KITTRELL) FARRIOR APPELLANT VERSUS KENDALL K. KITTRELL, SR. APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
More informationAPPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Mar 28 2018 16:45:38 2016-CA-00807-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2016 CA 00807 SCT 2016-CA-00807-SCT PATRICK RIDGEWAY, APPELLANT vs. VS. LOUISE RIDGEWAY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationINSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE
INSTRUCTIONS PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CRIMINAL RECORDS PROVIDED UNDER W.VA. CODE 61-11-26 Petition Form Carefully read the attached form to fill out your Petition for Expungement of Criminal Records
More informationAPPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
E-Filed Document Jan 24 201716:02:59 2015-CA-01428-COA Pages : 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELIZABETH GRAHAM and MATTHEW GRAHAM vs. JAMES R. "JAMIE" FRANKS, JR. and WHEELER AND FRANKS
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TUNICA COUNTY Cause No BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. ONE 1970 MERCURY COUGAR, YIN # OF9111545940 ONE 1992 FORD MUSTANG, YIN #FACP44E4NF173360 ONE FORD MUSTANG $355.00 U.S. CURRENCY AND WILLIE HAMPTON
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES
More information- 1 - DISTRICT 29A NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ***************************************** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
- 1 - No. DISTRICT 29A NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ***************************************** STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, vs. Plaintiff, BROOKE MCFADDEN COVINGTON, SARAH COVINGTON ANDERSON, and JUSTIN
More informationHAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT 24 HON. ROBERT L. HESS, JUDGE BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, ET AL, PLAINTIFF, VS MARY CUMMINS, DEFENDANT. CASE NO.: BS140207 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
E-Filed Document Sep 16 2014 12:20:19 2013-CA-01986 Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RAVEL WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-01986 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE
More informationCOMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by
E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION In re, No. A On Habeas Corpus. Related Appeal No. A County Superior Court No. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121
~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-CA-00121 REBUILD AMERICA, INC. APPELLANT VERSES ROBERT K. MILNER AND WIFE, PATRICIA K. MILNER AND W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.
E-Filed Document Feb 21 2014 14:40:09 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS v. Cause No. 2013-CA-01004 LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCENT BAILEY APPELLANT VS. NO. 2010-CP-0699 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationherein, counsel will move this Court before the Honorable Denny Chin, United States District
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, No. 08 Civ. 07104 (DC) - against NOTICE OF MOTION BY JOHN C. MERINGOLO, ESQ. TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationE-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Oct 20 2014 14:50:37 2014-CA-00381 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK W. DECKARD VS. LESA M. DECKARD APPELLANT CAUSE NO.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 201S-CA CA-00739
E-Filed Document Nov 1 2016 10:30:50 2015-CA-00739-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 201S-CA-00739 2015-CA-00739 SHELBY J. KILPATRICK APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE v. V.
More informationREPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WOODKREST CUSTOM HOMES INC., NATIONWIDE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION, LLC and ROBERT KRESS, SR. individually APPELLANTS VS. CAUSE NO.: 2008-TS-00846 JAMES COOPER
More informationv. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationGRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET
GRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET In Georgia grandparents can ask the Superior Court for visitation rights by filing a Petition for Visitation. There are two ways for a grandparent to seek visitation.
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Petition to enforce foreign judgment 1. The following form, Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment, is used to enforce a judgment obtained in a state other than Texas. 2. In order
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VS. STEVE LACROIX APPELLANT 2008-CA-01744 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff
E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
E-Filed Document Jun 24 2014 14:57:08 2013-CA-01002-COA Pages: 18 CASE NO. 2013-CA-01002 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC., BAPTIST MEMORIAL
More informationPETITION FOR TEMPORARY LETTERS OF GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR INSTRUCTIONS
PETITION FOR TEMPORARY LETTERS OF GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR I. Specific Instructions INSTRUCTIONS II. 1. This form is to be used for filing a Petition for Temporary Letters of Guardianship of a Minor pursuant
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION FAMILY DIVISION PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER
CIVIL ACTION FAMILY DIVISION Plaintiff vs No Defendant PETITION FOR MODIFICATION OF A CUSTODY ORDER 1 The Petition of (name), respectfully represents that on (date) an Order of Court was entered for (shared
More informationREPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document Aug 17 2016 15:50:02 2015-CA-01412-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-01412 20IS-CA-01412 BAR-TIL, BAR-TTL, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01635-COA TIMOTHY DUPUIS APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPELLANT'S BRIEF - ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: David Wade, GRAY-WADE, PLLC
More informationAppellant herein after referred to as Scruggs agree - that. the standard of review is that this Court would not disturb a denial
STATElfEIfT OF THE ISSUES ~ \-~- 1C)tJi) '7 DID THE CIRCUIT COURT ERR IN DENYING RELIEF ON THE PRISONER'S MOTION WHERE THE COURT FAILED TO FIND A FACTUAL BASIS FOR HIS PLEA? AS WELL AS THE COURT FAILURE
More informationKRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 3 CASE NO. 09-49079CA22 4 5 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.D. F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
More informationAPPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner
More informationForm DC-630 MOTION TO AMEND OR REVIEW ORDER Form DC-630
Using This Form 1. Copies (Contact the court or court services unit (Intake Office) to determine if you should bring copies with you or if copies will be made upon filing.) a. Original to court. b. First
More informationE-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17
E-Filed Document Dec 1 2017 18:19:55 2016-CA-01082 Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2016-CA-01082 TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN
More informationIN THE PROBATE COURT OF HENRY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PETITION OF GUARDIAN TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR
IN THE PROBATE COURT OF HENRY COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN RE: Estate No. Minor PETITION OF GUARDIAN TO TERMINATE TEMPORARY GUARDIANSHIP OF MINOR I/We, _, the temporary guardian(s of person of, a minor child,
More informationE-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jul 26 2016 13:13:30 2015-EC-01677-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TASHA DILLON APPELLANT vs. NO. 2015-CA-01677 DAVID MYERS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE
More informationJ-O 11- L~-/3f&;,3 -- toile'
J-O 11- L~-/3f&;,3 -- toile' Certificate of Interested Persons The undersigned counsel of record certifies the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE
E-Filed Document Oct 15 2014 23:49:51 2013-CA-00620-COA Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI VERA M. MILLER WOOD, et. al. APPELLANTS vs. SUPREME COURT: 2013-CA-00620 AUDREY H. KEMP, et. al. APPELLEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO IA SCT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-IA-00615-SCT MICHAEL L. FOSS, M.D. APPELLANT / DEFENDANT VS. DOROTHY WILLIAMS, Administratrix of the ESTATE OF PETER D. PRICE, DECEASED APPELLEE 1 PLAINTIFF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 17:02:31 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NEDRA PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CA-00502 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationBRIEF OF APPELLANTS, JAMES D. HAVARD AND MARGARET HAVARD
E-Filed Document Jun 29 2015 09:34:50 2015-CA-00138 Pages: 9 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES D. HAVARD and Wife, APPELLANTS ) MARGARET HAVARD, ) ) CASE VERSUS ) NUMBER ) 2015-CA-00138 TANELLE SUMRALL,
More informationOFFICE OF THE CLERK B
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 Elizabeth A. Shumaker (303) 844-3157 Douglas E. Cressler
More informationCase 4:05-cv Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Case 4:05-cv-00470-Y Document 86 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 7 PageID 789 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION RICHARD FRAME, WENDELL DECKER, and SCOTT UPDIKE, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN OF WAYNE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document May 11 2017 09:19:18 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.2016-CA-00928-COA CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. vs. VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLANT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARGIE EDNA (GALLOWAY) MALLETT WILSON V. DOCKET NO.: 2008-CA BYRON KEITH MALLETT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARGIE EDNA (GALLOWAY) MALLETT WILSON APPELLANT V. DOCKET NO.: 2008-CA-01196 BYRON KEITH MALLETT APPELLEE APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee
E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MATINNAZ CONSTRUCTION, INC., vs. Petitioner/Appellee, DIAMOND REGAL DEVELOPMENT, INC., Case No.: SC09-4786 L.T. Case No.: 1D07-4786/ 1D07-5580 Respondent/Appellant. / ON REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI 0 PRESCOTT SPORTSMANS CLUB, by and) through Board of Directors, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARK SMITH; TIM MASON; WILLIAM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationInformation or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW
Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel 1. This motion allows attorneys to substitute on a case. 2. See TRCP 8, which states that the leading counsel shall be
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY; MID-SOUTH FORESTRY, INC.; AUG RICHARD CHISM, INDIVIDUALLY AND
COpy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GLEN D. JACKSON APPELLANT v. NO. 2oo8-CA-00376 CHARLES CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A REGISTERED FORESTER AND FILED DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY;
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) ), ) ) Defendant. )
, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No., Defendant. MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR GRANDPARENT VISITATION The Intervening grandparent(s,, show(s that he/ she/ they are entitled to intervene under O.C.G.A. 19-7-3(b in
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, ) ) 6 PLAINTIFF, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. 1381216 ) 8 WILLIAM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 20, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 20, 2010 Session LARA L. BATTLESON v. DEAN L. BATTLESON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 8094 G. Richard Johnson, Chancellor
More informationREPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS
E-Filed Document Apr 10 2017 14:49:03 2016-CC-01121-COA Pages: 8 COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2016-CC-01121-COA LEONARD ALPERT, IZABELLA ALPERT, AND THUY LAND PAWN SHOP, INC. APPELLANTS
More informationCase4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SBA Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, VS. PLAINTIFF, SANDISK CORPORATION, ET AL,
More information2-1 determine whether the public record involved is under the Mississippi Public Records Act of 1983 or available to the applicant;
Descriptor Term REQUEST FOR INFORMATION/PUBLIC RECORDS PAGE 1 OF 4 Descriptor Code KBAA KBA Issue Date 10/27/2015 10/26/2010 The Mississippi Public Records Act of 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the Act)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA APPELLEE / CROSS-APPELLANT LOUISE TAYLOR REPLY BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLANT BRENDA FORTENBERRY
E-Filed Document Feb 1 2017 18:41:34 2015-CA-01369-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Inc., and ORTHO-McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, Inc. APPELLANTS / CROSS-APPELLEES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DARRIUS EUBANKS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-KA-1201 ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA-1414-SCT CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANTS (NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ONNAM BILOXI, LLC VERSUS RAS FAMILY PARTNERS, LP and RAY S. SIMS RAS FAMILY PARTNERS, LP and RAY A. SIMS VERSUS ONNAM BILOXI, LLC CONSOLIDATED WITH APPELLANTDEFENDANT
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III
E-Filed Document May 11 2016 15:57:28 2013-CA-01468-COA Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2013-CA-01468 NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III, as Trustee of the N.L. Cassibry, Jr. Family Trust, Trustee
More informationIN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 6/26/2017 4:15 PM, Joanne P. Simmons, Fifth District Court of Appeal MICHAEL CONNOLLY, Plaintiff/Petitioner, Case No.: 5D17-1172
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT DEFEENDANT-APPELLEE S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
Case: 15-5100 Document: 89-1 Page: 1 Filed: 11/29/2016 (1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ANTHONY PISZEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 2015-5100 UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No.2009-CA APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2009-CA-00841 GEORGE M. BOZIER VS. APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE RICHARD J. SCHILLING, JR. AND SW GAMING LLC APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT CE-ll HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE ROSENBERG, NO. BP109162 DECEASED. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Suprem. Court Court 0' Appeal. BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
, " ", ~'~fd!\vl IF'\' I'" -,' I' J "~.:;;,,.' L...J J IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ALVIN D. THOMPSON VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY 222008 orno. 0' the Clerk Suprem. Court Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CHARLES GREEN, Appellant Versus MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Christopher Epps, Commissioner, James M. Holman Superintendent, and Chandra Berryman, Legal
More informationFILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT
e O"y IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-tlb2082 NANCYLOIT APPELLANT VERSUS HARRIS D. PURVIS AND BRJ INC. FILED MAR 3 1 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURf COURT OF APPEAlS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED APR OFFICE OF Tlit. ;..,1.c:.RK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS
N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MSSSSPP N THE MATTER OF THE CONSERVATORSHP OF CARL WLLAM ARNOLD, SR. CAUSE NO. A,() 1.. m ~ CARL WLLAM ARNOLD, JR., LYNDA ARNOLD GAMBRELL, and DEBORAH ARNOLD HERNDON
More informationCause No CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS. MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant
Cause No. 05-09-00640-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS MARTIN GREENSTEIN, Appellant v. CURTIS LEO BAGGETT and BART BAGGETT, Appellees Appealed from the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationAPPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT
F - PRACTICE FORMS APPENDIX F. NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY APPELLATE PRACTICE FORMS 1. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT FORM F1 2. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL
E-Filed Document Aug 24 2015 15:39:23 2015-CA-00371 Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY PLAINTIFFS AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEFENDANT/APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 11:38:08 2014-SA-01364-COA Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-TS-01364 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
More information