E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE S PRINCIPAL BRIEF (ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED) APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FOR THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WINSTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CALEB E. MAY (MSB#102593) Caleb E. May, Attorney At Law PLLC 422 Center Avenue P.O. Box 388 Philadelphia, Mississippi (601) calebemay@gmail.com Counsel for Appellee

2 V. C.H. MILES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA BRENDA C. MILES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES APPELLANT APPELLEE The undersigned counsel of record to the Appellees certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order for the Justices of the Supreme Court and/or the Judges of the Court of Appeals to evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. 1. The Appellee, Brenda C. Miles. 2. The Appellant, C.H. Carlos Miles, deceased. 3. Appellant s trial counsel, Taylor Tucker. 4. Appellee s trial counsel, J. Max Kilpatrick 5. Appellee s appellate counsel, Caleb E. May. 6. Appellant s appellate counsel, Jefferey J. Hosford. 7. Honorable Joseph D. Kilgore, Chancery Judge of the Sixth Judicial District. This the 12th day of May RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CALEB E. MAY (MSB#102593) Caleb E. May, Attorney At Law PLLC 422 Center Avenue P.O. Box 388 Philadelphia, Mississippi (601) calebemay@gmail.com s/caleb E. May BY: CALEB E. MAY Attorney for the Appellee i.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PARTIES TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES STATEMENT OF THE CASE. I. Course of Proceedings. II. III. IV. Evidence.. Argument A. WHETHER THE CHANCELLOR ERRED BY FINDING CONTEMPT AND AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES?.. 1. Standard of Review. 2. Impossibility Statute of Limitations. Conclusion. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE i ii iii ii.

4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES: Carite v. Carite, 841 Miss (Miss. App. 2002).. 9, 11 Dorr v. Dorr, 797 So. 2d 1008 (Miss. App. 2001)..6, 7, 10 Johnson v. Black, 469 So. 2d 88 (Miss.1985) , 6 McIntosh v. Dept. of Human Services, 886 So. 721 (Miss. 2004)....6, 7 Nichols v. Funderburk, 883 So. 2d 554 (Miss. 2004)..5 iii.

5 V. C.H. MILES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA BRENDA C. MILES STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES This contempt case involves the following issue on appeal: APPELLANT APPELLEE 1. Whether the Chancellor erred by finding the husband in contempt and awarding attorney s fees? I. Course of the Proceedings STATEMENT OF THE CASE On June 12, 2013, the Appellant, C.H. Miles, hereinafter Carlos, noticed his appeal of the Judgment of Contempt issued by the Chancery Court of Winston County, Mississippi. The Judgment was issued on May 17, 2013, by Chancellor Joseph Kilgore. The Chancellor held in favor of the Appellee, Brenda C. Miles, hereinafter Brenda, and found that Carlos had violated the terms of the Property Settlement Agreement executed by the parties and incorporated into their Final Judgment of Divorce entered on February 15, 2000 by the Chancery Court of Winston County, Mississippi. (R. E. 1-16) Brenda filed a Motion For Contempt on October 16, 2012 citing violation of Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement Agreement. Paragraph IX states: Husband shall place Wife s name on his Individual Retirement Account (IRA) Certificate of Deposit at Bank of Mississippi, as a joint tenant with full rights of survivorship. The Motion for Contempt further cited that: The Respondent (Carlos) has willfully, contemptuously, and intentionally refused (sic) to place her name on the IRA account. 1

6 Further, Movant (Brenda) would show that the IRA account at Bank of Mississippi has been closed. Brenda sought repayment of one half of $57,859.44, which represented the amount within the subject IRA account before Carlos withdrew all the funds and closed the account. (R.E ) Chancellor Joseph Kilgore held a trial on the Motion for Contempt on May 1, 2013, issued his bench opinion and findings on that day, and entered a Judgment of Contempt on May 17, In the Judgment the Chancellor ruled, for the reasons stated within his Bench Opinion, that Carlos s Affirmative Defenses were denied, that Carlos was in civil contempt of Court for failure to place the name of Brenda on his IRA Certificate of Deposit as a joint tenant with full rights of survivorship as required by the Judgment of Divorces and Property Settlement Agreement, that Carlos was to pay Brenda $26,086.53, and that Brenda was awarded $1, in attorneys fees plus all costs of Court to be paid by Carlos within sixty days of the Judgment. (T and R.E. 2-3, 18-31) II. Evidence Within the February 2000 Property Settlement Agreement executed by the parties, the following paragraphs are applicable to the case at hand: Paragraph IX states: Husband shall place Wife s name on his Individual Retirement Account (IRA) Certificate of Deposit at Bank of Mississippi, as a joint tenant with full rights of survivorship. (R.E. 12) Paragraph XIV states: 2

7 Husband and Wife shall execute any deeds, bills of sale, titles or other documents necessary to accomplish the intent of the parties and carry out the terms of this Agreement. (R. E ) Paragraph XVI states: Each party acknowledges that he or she is financially capable of performing the obligations set forth in this agreement. (R.E. 14) Paragraph XVII states: This written document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. Each party acknowledges and fully understands that no oral representations made by either party will be considered binding on either party and that this agreement may be changed or modified only by written agreement of the parties or by an Order from any Court having jurisdiction over this matter. The terms of this Agreement may be incorporated in a Final Judgment of Divorce entered by the Chancery Court of Winston County, Mississippi. (R.E ) Only Carlos and Brenda testified at the hearing held on May 1, Carlos admitted that he did not place Brenda s name on the IRA Certificate of Deposit. (T ) Neither Carlos nor Brenda disputed that $52, was taken out of the IRA Certificate of Deposit between September 2, 2004 to January 4, (T. 12, 16, 35-41) Both Carlos and Brenda testified concerning an out-of-court conversation and meeting at the Bank of Mississippi that took place almost immediately after the February 2000 Final Judgment of Divorce and Property Settlement Agreement was entered. The parties disagreed as to who was present at the meeting, but each agreed that they spoke to each 3

8 other concerning what was said by the bank officer. (T. 7-9, 41-44) The Chancellor, in his Bench Opinion, disregarded any agreement the parties may have had outside the bank, especially since there s some dispute as to what actually took place at this meeting. (T. 59) Carlos raises two issues within his one statement of issues; however, both issues raised by Carlos hinge upon whether it was impossible to carry out the provisions of Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement agreement. Further in his Bench Opinion, the Chancellor states: He (Carlos) stated that he was told that he couldn t be listed as a joint tenant on an IRA. The only testimony regarding impossibly that Carlos presented was based on hearsay testimony of Ilene Estes that he could list his then ex-wife as a joint tenant on this account. Brenda felt that her name could be added at maturity of the IRA, and the Court's not going to use any of its own outside knowledge of those issues. The Court finds that Carlos has not met his burden that it was impossible to comply with this court order because the bank in question is only feet away from where we're sitting right now. The Court just doesn't have sufficient evidence in front of it to know that it was impossible to list Brenda's name on that. (T. 60) 4

9 III. Argument A. WHETHER THE CHANCELLOR ERRED BY FINDING THE HUSBAND IN CONTEMPT AND AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES? 1. Standard of Review The Appellant s argument consists entirely of a request for the Appellate Court to conduct de novo review and reweigh the evidence. Such review and reweighing is prohibited by the applicable Standard of Review. Even after review of the Trial Judge s decision and further review of the evidence contained within the record and trial transcript, there is no apparent error committed by the Trial Judge in his decisions and final ruling. With no manifest error, the Appellate Court should not reverse the ruling and decisions of the Trial Judge. In his brief, Carlos does not quote the Standard of Review. The importance of the Standard of Review is reiterated time and again in the opinions of the Mississippi Appellate Courts. The applicable standard states that The Court will reverse only when the Chancellor s determinations were manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous, or when the Chancellor applied an incorrect legal standard. Nichols v. Funderburk, 883 So. 2d 554, 556 (Miss. 2004) If substantial evidence supports the chancellor's fact-findings, this Court must affirm, even though we might have found otherwise as an original matter. Id. It requires little familiarity with the institutional structure of our judicial system to know that this Court does not sit to redetermine questions of fact. Our scope of review is severely limited...suffice it to say that we have no authority to grant appellant any relief if there be substantial credible evidence in the record undergirding 5

10 the determinative findings of fact made in the chancery court. Johnson v. Black, 469 So. 2d 88, 90 (Miss.1985) In his failure to mention or discuss the Standard of Review, Carlos asks that the Standard of Review be ignored. The Standard of Review restricts the Appellate Court from de novo review of evidence. Under the guiding light of the applicable Standard of Review, Carlos s issues of appeal are seen for their true nature, that true nature being a request for de novo review and a reweighing of the evidence by the Appellate Court. We will return to the Standard of Review often within the following arguments. 2. Impossibility In his Summary of the Argument, Carlos assigns error to the Chancellor s decision on the basis that compliance with the Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement Agreement is impossible as a matter of law. (Appellant s Brief 5) Although the third paragraph under subsection I. of his II. Argument on pages 9-10 of the Appellant s brief states part of the law concerning a defense against contempt, the Appellant leaves out what the Chancellor noted in his bench opinion: Failure to comply with a court order is prima facie evidence of contempt, according to McIntosh versus Department of Human Services. Carlos admission that he has not complied with the order is the prima facie evidence of his contempt. He then had the burden of showing an inability to pay, which was not applicable since he was not ordered to pay as a part of this provision; that his default was not willful; that the provision violated was ambiguous; or that the performance was impossible or some other defense, according to Dorr versus Dorr. (T ) 6

11 McIntosh v. Dept. of Human Services, 886 So.2d 721, 724 (Miss. 2004); Dorr v. Dorr, 797 So.2d 1008, 1017 (Miss.App. 2001) Carlos uses the first paragraph under subsection I. of his II. Argument on page 8 of his brief to explain how he would have written Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement Agreement. In the second paragraph of that subsection he misquotes hearsay testimony in an attempt to argue that Carlos s compliance with Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement Agreement was impossible because it was illegal as a matter of law. Carlos states: Both the Husband and the Wife testified at the contempt hearing that they became aware of the defect in Paragraph IX of the settlement agreement the day in 2000 the final judgment was entered because, the bank officer of the then Bank of Mississippi told them they could not legally put the Wifes name on the IRA certificate of deposit. (emphasis added) (Appellant s Brief 9) Let s review the two versions of hearsay testimony that were presented by Brenda and Carlos. Brenda testified that the bank officer said: She told us that we couldn't have two names on our IRA; that we could take it out, but if we took it out, we would be charged so much penalties and so much interest on it that we would lose probably over half of it on penalties and taxes. And she recommended to us that we leave it until it matured or until he got closer to retirement age, and there wouldn't be any penalties, and at that time, we could take it out, divide it, and put it in two different names. (T. 8-9) Carlos testified that the bank officer said: And she said, "What can I do for you today?" I said -- and I laid the document on her desk. I said, "I want to put Brenda's name on that IRA," and she pulled it up on the 7

12 computer, started shaking her head. She said, "You can't put two names on an IRA." I said, "Well, I'm just -- it's on -- in the divorce settlement that I was to do it," and she looked at it -- looked at the divorce settlement. She said, "Who did this?" And I told her the lawyer that did it. She said, "Well, you cannot." And she explained to me -- she said, "An IRA means exactly what it says: individual retirement account." And she said, "You're an individual. You can't put two names on it. (T. 43) In neither version of the testimony does the third party state the whether the action was legal. Further, we must reiterate the fact that Carlos rests his illegality/ impossibility as a matter of law argument on testimony of decade old hearsay statements of a third party of whom no proof was offered that said third party was qualified as an expert in the legalities and illegalities of banking and finance law. In reviewing this specific testimony the Chancellor stated: The Court finds that Carlos has not met his burden that it was impossible to comply with this court order because the bank in question is only feet away from where we're sitting right now. (T. 60) More evidence was literally feet away, yet Carlos asks that the evidence he presented is sufficient to overturn the Chancellor s ruling. The Chancellor did not err in the weight he gave to the evidence presented, and he certainly did not commit a substantial err in his decision considering what was presented. In another attempt to draw attention away from the request to reweigh evidence, the Appellant closes the second paragraph with another statement of how he would have handled Brenda s problems with Carlos s failure to abide by Paragraph IX. 8

13 Carlos remained responsible to comply with Paragraph IX from the date the Agreement was made a part of the Courts Order unto the present. The Appellant s brief states that a Motion to Clarify or Modify the Property Settlement Agreement could have been brought. Certainly it could have, and it was Carlos s duty to bring such Motion if he thought that his performance of Paragraph IX was impossible. In his Bench Opinion, the Chancellor quotes Carite v. Carite, 841 So. 2d 1148, stating.that the original divorce judgment and property settlement agreement required Mr. Carite to take the initiative in giving her her interest. The Chancellor continues citing to the Carite case when he says: The chancery court found that the settlement agreement required the husband to initiate the apportioning of pension benefits (T ) Carite v. Carite, 841 Miss (Miss. App. 2002) Based on the language of Carite it remained Carlos s duty to perform the requirement of Paragraph IX to place Brenda s name on the IRA. He didn t perform his obligation, and he didn t take any initiative to clarify or modify his obligation if he thought it was impossible. He continued to do noting even though he agreed to do something, and Carlos knew that Brenda would never get the benefit or potential if he did nothing. Neither party can argue that they agreed to Paragraph IX with the intention of no potential benefit to Brenda. The provision would give Brenda rights to the IRA account, and Carlos s failure to put her name on the account and his subsequent withdrawal of all the money in the IRA extinguished any and all potential benefit to which he agreed to give Brenda. Carlos was in contempt, Brenda met her burden of proving that he was in contempt, and we must return to the question of impossibility and the proof thereof. 9

14 On page 10 of his brief, Carlos returns to the testimony that was presented. He quotes his testimony, he paraphrases Brenda s testimony to his liking, and then he demands the Appellate Court to look again at how he would have drafted the Property Settlement Agreement. Without returning to the reliability of the evidence presented, Carlos attempts to hang his hat on the argument that he was frustrated in his initial attempt to comply with Paragraph IX, and, therefore, it was impossible to comply with Paragraph IX. Carlos then blatantly misstates the burden of proof on page 11 of his brief. He blames the lack of evidence of impossibility presented as just as much the Wife s failure as it is the Husband s. (Appellant s brief 11) Neither party questions whether Carlos put Brenda s name on the IRA. Carlos admits to never putting her name on the IRA. That shows knowing, willful, and intentional disobedience of the Court s order in the Property Settlement Agreement, and the burden of proving contempt was met. The burden of proving impossibility shifts to Carlos. Dorr, 797 So.2d at 1017 Carlos acknowledges that the only evidence presented as to impossibility was hearsay testimony, and he is correct that Brenda did not object to this testimony. (Appellant s brief 11) He does fail to acknowledge that the Chancellor considered this testimony and found it unreliable, which was completely within his discretion. (T. 60) The Chancellor despite what Carlos argues does not have to accept the testimony of hearsay statements as true. At the risk of sounding repetitive we will reiterate that the testimony was of decade old statements made by a third party over whom the Court could not qualify as an expert because that person was not present at trial. This was a 10

15 matter of the absence of facts of impossibility, and the Chancellor rightfully found such absence of facts. 3. Statute of Limitations Carlos does not specifically argue a violation of the Statute of Limitations in his appeal. On page 13 of his brief, Carlos states his Statute of Limitations argument: If the Husband in this case had been able, as a matter of law, to perform the action agreed to as in the settlement, he would have no argument. However, the issue returns to the condition of impossibility. Instead of returning to the impossibility arguments we have made in subsection 2. of this brief, I ask that those arguments be reincorporated in this subsection as if reprinted herein. Because Carlos only argues impossibility as grounds to deny based on the Statute of Limitation, we will rest our argument on our previous arguments made within this brief and upon the findings of the Chancellor as to the Statute of Limitations to the extent that those findings go beyond such impossibility argument. IV. CONCLUSION Paragraph IX of the Property Settlement Agreement was specific, and Carlos failed to comply with it. Carlos admitted his failure to comply. He continued to be responsible for his compliance as required by Carite unless he met the burden of proving impossibility. The Appellate Courts give Chancellors the benefit of the doubt concerning the reliability of the evidence presented at trial and will not overturn or reweigh evidence unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. There is no abuse of discretion, and the Chancellor should be confirmed. 11

16 This the 12th day of May RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, CALEB E. MAY (MSB#102593) Caleb E. May, Attorney At Law PLLC 422 Center Avenue P.O. Box 388 Philadelphia, Mississippi (601) s/caleb E. May BY: CALEB E. MAY Attorney for the Appellee 12

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the Appellee s Principal Brief has been forwarded via first class mail to the following persons, postage pre-paid, to the following addresses: Appellants Counsel Jeffrey J. Hosford 115-A S. Lafayette St. Starkville, MS Trial Judge Honorable Joseph Kilgore P. O. Box 1006 Philadelphia, MS Appellee s Trial Counsel J. Max Kilpatrick P.O. Box 520 Philadelphia, MS Respectfully Submitted this the 12th day of May s/caleb E. May CALEB E. MAY Attorney for the Appellee 13

18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Caleb E. May, attorney for the Appellee, do hereby certify that on this day I electronically filed the foregoing brief in the matter C.H. Miles (Appellant) v. Brenda C. Miles (Appellee), case number 2013-CA for filing with the Clerk of the Supreme Court/Court of Appeals using the MEC system. I have filed the Appellee s Record Excerpts as an attachment to this brief using the MEC system. This the 12th day of May s/caleb E. May CALEB E. MAY Attorney for the Appellee 14

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-1376 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AND JAKEIDA J.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-1376 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AND JAKEIDA J. E-Filed Document Jun 2 2016 14:22:27 2015-CA-01376 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-1376 DANNY P. HICKS, II APPELLANT VERSUS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT PATRICK J. HIGGINS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT PATRICK J. HIGGINS E-Filed Document Jun 2 2015 00:01:29 2014-CA-00251 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK J. HIGGINS APPELLANT v. No. 2014-CA-00251 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

More information

APPELLANT'S BRIEF. Case No CA ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI RHONDA B. (KITTRELL) FARRIOR APPELLANT

APPELLANT'S BRIEF. Case No CA ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI RHONDA B. (KITTRELL) FARRIOR APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2007-CA-01868 RHONDA B. (KITTRELL) FARRIOR APPELLANT VERSUS KENDALL K. KITTRELL, SR. APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF GREENE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT'S

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 07:21:41 2014-KA-01098-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-KA-01098-COA SHERMAN BILLIE, SR. APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

V. CASE NO CA-00669

V. CASE NO CA-00669 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. APPELLANT V. CASE NO. 2011-CA-00669 PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 23 2017 16:38:55 2017-KA-00181-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EDDIE EARL DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00181 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Oct 20 2014 14:50:37 2014-CA-00381 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK W. DECKARD VS. LESA M. DECKARD APPELLANT CAUSE NO.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT VS. LUCIANA GASCON CURTIS PALCULICT APPELLANT CAUSE NO.: 2007-CA-019S4 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS No.2016-KP COA No.2016-KP COA

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS No.2016-KP COA No.2016-KP COA IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS No.2016-KP-01753-COA No.2016-KP-01755-COA ". I,'.' i KEITH HIGGINBOTHAM v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winston County, Fifth Judicial

More information

NO CA Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

NO CA Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION E-Filed Document Apr 28 2016 19:23:00 2014-CA-01006-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014 CA-01006-Brenda Franklin v. Cornelius Turner BRENDA FRANKLIN Appellant/Plaintiff

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES /' ~ ~'. '\.. ' ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA FILE':';, MAY 262011 om.. af the Clerk 8up... COurt Courto'~I. MATT BROWN & HOLLI BROWN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA PATRICIA S. PEARSON BROWNING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA PATRICIA S. PEARSON BROWNING IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00790-COA DENNIS L. PEARSON APPELLANT v. PATRICIA S. PEARSON BROWNING APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/05/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. D. NEIL HARRIS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

FILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT

FILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT e O"y IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-tlb2082 NANCYLOIT APPELLANT VERSUS HARRIS D. PURVIS AND BRJ INC. FILED MAR 3 1 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURf COURT OF APPEAlS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 27 2017 15:41:09 2016-CA-01033-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL ISHEE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CA-01033-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 201S-CA CA-00739

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 201S-CA CA-00739 E-Filed Document Nov 1 2016 10:30:50 2015-CA-00739-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 201S-CA-00739 2015-CA-00739 SHELBY J. KILPATRICK APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE v. V.

More information

CAUSE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL.

CAUSE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL. CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-01188 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. Appellant v. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL. Appellee BRIEF OF APPELLEE Jeffrey D. Rawlings (MSB Jon J. Mims (MSB Rawlings

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. E-Filed Document Jan 12 2017 15:26:19 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2016-CA-01085 MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 17 2015 16:00:09 2014-CC-01798 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-CC-01798 OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VS. STEVE LACROIX APPELLANT 2008-CA-01744 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APPEAL

More information

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No.: 07-D UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No.: 07-D UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No.: 07-D-09-000071 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2224 September Term, 2017 ROBERT MALINOWSKI v. FLORENCE MALINOWSKI Fader, C. J. Shaw Geter,

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLANT, JEREMY MOSELEY, ON APPEAL FROM THE HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT 1 st JUD. DIST.

BRIEF OF APPELLANT, JEREMY MOSELEY, ON APPEAL FROM THE HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT 1 st JUD. DIST. E-Filed Document Feb 14 2014 14:57:47 2013-CA-01205 Pages: 30 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEREMY MOSELEY APPELLANT VS. APPEAL NO.: 2013-CA-01205 TIFFINY MOSELEY SMITH APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIAN ROBISON, et al APPELLANTS VS. NO. 2009-CA-00383 ENTERPRISE RENT -A-CAR COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLEES I CROSS-APPELLANTS

BRIEF OF APPELLEES I CROSS-APPELLANTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BARBARA JACKSON VS. DAVID J. LOWE, SR. and PATRICIA A. LOWE APPELLANT NO.201O-CP-00062 APPELLEES -AND- DAVID J. LOWE, SR. and PATRICIA A. LOWE CROSS-APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARGIE EDNA (GALLOWAY) MALLETT WILSON V. DOCKET NO.: 2008-CA BYRON KEITH MALLETT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARGIE EDNA (GALLOWAY) MALLETT WILSON V. DOCKET NO.: 2008-CA BYRON KEITH MALLETT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARGIE EDNA (GALLOWAY) MALLETT WILSON APPELLANT V. DOCKET NO.: 2008-CA-01196 BYRON KEITH MALLETT APPELLEE APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 12 2016 18:30:47 2014-CT-00260-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00260 DAVID GLENN NUNNERY, ET AL. V. PAUL EDWARD NUNNERY, ET AL. PETITIONERS RESPONDENTS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00702

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00702 E-Filed Document Jun 6 2017 16:14:50 2016-CA-00702-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00702 RICHARD COLL APPELLANT VERSUS WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN 1PELLANTS V. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORT A TION COMMISSION

More information

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jun 16 2014 10:52:26 2013-KM-01129-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI D'ANDRE TERRELL APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session PATSY C. CATE v. JAMES DANIEL THOMAS A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 58062 The Honorable Steven Stafford,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 14:20:08 2015-CC-01422 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY vs. VS. ARDERS

More information

v No Macomb Probate Court KAREN MAHER, EDWARD SADORSKI, JR., LC No DE KENNETH SADORSKI, AND ESTELLE SADORSKI,

v No Macomb Probate Court KAREN MAHER, EDWARD SADORSKI, JR., LC No DE KENNETH SADORSKI, AND ESTELLE SADORSKI, S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S In re Estate of EDWARD SADORSKI, SR., Deceased. ANN SADORSKI, Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 20, 2017 v No. 332416 Macomb Probate Court KAREN MAHER,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2017 10:50:18 2016-CA-00444 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS-00444-SCT L. H. MANNING, VIRGINIA WARREN, JOHN HENRY MANNING, EVA MANNING, GEANNIE JONES, AND

More information

llpage IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA APPELLANT BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR.

llpage IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA APPELLANT BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA-02000 BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR. APPELLANT V. BETH STINNETT, D.D.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND D /B/ A FAMILY DENISTRY APPELLEES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01079

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01079 E-Filed Document Oct 25 2016 15:38:12 2014-CA-01079-COA Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-01079 THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER APPELLANT VS. KIM HAMPTON, INDIVIDUALLY,

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jun 24 2014 14:57:08 2013-CA-01002-COA Pages: 18 CASE NO. 2013-CA-01002 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC., BAPTIST MEMORIAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DARRIUS EUBANKS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-KA-1201 ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 28 2018 16:45:38 2016-CA-00807-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2016 CA 00807 SCT 2016-CA-00807-SCT PATRICK RIDGEWAY, APPELLANT vs. VS. LOUISE RIDGEWAY

More information

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Oct 27 2015 16:20:26 2013-KA-01758-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DILLARD HARVEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-01758-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI US BANK TRUST, N.A. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI US BANK TRUST, N.A. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Apr 7 2017 15:30:20 2016-CA-01770 Pages: 28 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FRANKLIN N. WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. 2016-CA-01770 US BANK TRUST, N.A. APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA E-Filed Document Jul 5 2016 19:15:35 2014-CA-01692-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2014-CA-01692-COA CRAIG W. CLEVELAND APPELLANT/CROSS- APPELLEE VS. DEUTSCHE BANK

More information

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner

More information

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document May 11 2016 11:16:48 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN A/K/A BOOTY VS. APPELLANT NO. 2014-KA-00615-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE

ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE E-Filed Document Oct 15 2014 23:49:51 2013-CA-00620-COA Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI VERA M. MILLER WOOD, et. al. APPELLANTS vs. SUPREME COURT: 2013-CA-00620 AUDREY H. KEMP, et. al. APPELLEES

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-1412 R. CHADWICK EDWARDS, JR. VERSUS LAROSE SCRAP & SALVAGE, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Dec 28 2015 17:29:25 2014-KA-00664-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES JOHNSON APPELLANT V. 2014-KA-00664-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KM COA CITY OF LOUISVILLE, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KM COA CITY OF LOUISVILLE, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:24:53 2016-KM-01753-COA Pages: 22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KEITH HIGGINBOTHAM APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2016-KM- 01753- COA CITY OF LOUISVILLE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL

More information

March 15, 1996 RAYMOND LINDSEY ) and JOHNNIE FAYE LOWE, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Plaintiffs/Appellees, ) Blount Chancery No

March 15, 1996 RAYMOND LINDSEY ) and JOHNNIE FAYE LOWE, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Plaintiffs/Appellees, ) Blount Chancery No . IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT KNOXVILLE FILED March 15, 1996 RAYMOND LINDSEY and JOHNNIE FAYE LOWE, Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiffs/Appellees, Blount Chancery

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III E-Filed Document May 11 2016 15:57:28 2013-CA-01468-COA Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2013-CA-01468 NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III, as Trustee of the N.L. Cassibry, Jr. Family Trust, Trustee

More information

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION E-Filed Document Jan 24 201716:02:59 2015-CA-01428-COA Pages : 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELIZABETH GRAHAM and MATTHEW GRAHAM vs. JAMES R. "JAMIE" FRANKS, JR. and WHEELER AND FRANKS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO BA-250-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI BAR BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO BA-250-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI BAR BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 17 2017 23:59:25 2017-BA-00250-SCT Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2017-BA-250-SCT MICHAEL W. CROSBY APPELLANT VERSUS THE MISSISSIPPI BAR APPELLEE

More information

MOTION FOR REHEARING

MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Nov 12 2015 20:00:37 2014-KA-01283-SCT Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IRA DONELL BOWSER a/k/a IRA BOWSER a/k/a IRA D. BOWSER APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01283-SCT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 14 2017 13:53:28 2017-KA-00436-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JULIUS BENDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00436-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT

APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT How to APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT Justice Court in Maricopa County June 23, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORM (# MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT Either party may appeal

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 22 2017 16:26:00 2016-CA-00637 Pages: 28 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-CA-00637 DAVID MICHAEL LYON, JR. APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO.:

More information

PETITION FOR REHEARING

PETITION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 August v. Mecklenburg County No. 09 CVD JACQUELINE MOSS, Defendant

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 7 August v. Mecklenburg County No. 09 CVD JACQUELINE MOSS, Defendant NO. COA11-1313 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 7 August 2012 GREGORY K. MOSS, Plaintiff v. Mecklenburg County No. 09 CVD 19525 JACQUELINE MOSS, Defendant 1. Appeal and Error preservation of issues

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.2008-CA r- ~~A~PPELLANT FILED MAY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.2008-CA r- ~~A~PPELLANT FILED MAY I ' L [: r~ r' I. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.2008-CA-01602 r: i. AARON CRAIG MELTON VS. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT r- ~~A~PPELLANT FILED MAY 122009 A~PELLEE j.

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jan 3 2017 15:44:13 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC. APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DA YID BRYANT, JR. V. PAMELA RENA SMITH BRYANT -e: APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CA-00669 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT (ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT (ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED) E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 17:18:32 2016-CA-00168-COA Pages: 27 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-CA-00168-COA KENNY WALTON APPLELLANT VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Feb 12 2018 10:06:26 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES

More information

Before STEWART, GASKINS and PEATROSS, JJ.

Before STEWART, GASKINS and PEATROSS, JJ. Judgment rendered November 2, 2011. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 46,517-CA No. 46,518-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES ALBERT WIGGINS VS. BILLY RAY PERRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2006-CA-01126 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED LINDSEY C. MEADOR MEADOR & CRUMP P.O.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 8, 2008 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 8, 2008 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 8, 2008 Session BETH ANN MASON v. THADDEAUS SCOTT MASON Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 06-0808DR Royce Taylor, Chancellor

More information

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION

More information

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Aug 17 2016 15:50:02 2015-CA-01412-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-01412 20IS-CA-01412 BAR-TIL, BAR-TTL, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANTS E-Filed Document May 31 2018 10:23:48 2016-CA-01057-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-01057 DAVID NEIL HARRIS, SR. AND VECIE MICHELE HARRIS APPELLANTS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA APPELLEE / CROSS-APPELLANT LOUISE TAYLOR REPLY BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLANT BRENDA FORTENBERRY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA APPELLEE / CROSS-APPELLANT LOUISE TAYLOR REPLY BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLANT BRENDA FORTENBERRY E-Filed Document Feb 1 2017 18:41:34 2015-CA-01369-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Inc., and ORTHO-McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, Inc. APPELLANTS / CROSS-APPELLEES

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 22 2017 21:22:44 2016-KA-01351-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE BRENT APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01351-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida CASE NO. (Circuit Court Case No. and Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE INDYMAC INDA MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-AR2,

More information

* * * * * * * * (Court composed of Chief Judge Joan Bernard Armstrong, Judge Michael E. Kirby and Judge Max N. Tobias Jr.)

* * * * * * * * (Court composed of Chief Judge Joan Bernard Armstrong, Judge Michael E. Kirby and Judge Max N. Tobias Jr.) BARBARA DENAIS SMITH VERSUS ROGER D. SMITH * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2004-CA-0690 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 89-22611, DIVISION

More information

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE

ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE JOSEPH SIMMONS, JR. VERSUS CORNELL JACKSON AND THE PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 18-CA-141 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 2 2018 15:26:36 2017-KA-01455-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LADALE AIROSTEVE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT v. No. 2017-KA-01455-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information