Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe & McNally, LLP January 13, Original Content
|
|
- Spencer Boyd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HMYLAW Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe & McNally, LLP January 13, 2015 Original Content Don t Tread on City Property For Whom the Tolls Swell? Illegal Tattoos Don t Tread on City Property In United Veterans Memorial and Patriotic Ass n of the City of New Rochelle v. City of New Rochelle, a U.S. District Court Judge held that City of New Rochelle officials were within their rights to take down a well-known flag declaring Don t Tread On Me, maintained by a veterans group at the City s armory WL According to the complaint, the veterans group is an association that exercise[s] responsibility for all veterans affairs and duties throughout the City of New Rochelle, including organizing the annual Memorial Day and Veterans Day events and numerous other ceremonies. [It] acts as the liaison between the City of New Rochelle and several other veterans groups and provides services to the community, including teaching schoolchildren about military history and providing support to veterans. The New Rochelle Armory (the Armory ) was built in 1931 and was an active duty military post until In 1997, New York State conveyed the Armory to the City by a deed that requires that the property remain open for public use for park, recreation, street and highway purposes. The City generally granted United Veterans... the right to display and maintain flags on the flagpole located on the grounds of the Armory, which are open and accessible to the general public. Since 1997, Plaintiffs have purchased the flags displayed on the flagpole, replaced those flags when they have become tattered, provided and replaced the rope used to hold the flags, and painted the flagpole and anchors when needed. It also paid for and installed a light to illuminate the flagpole. On March 21, 2013, the group held a flag ceremony at the Armory at which they retired a tattered American Flag and replaced it with a new one that had been donated by United Veterans to the City. Below the American Flag, United Veterans hung a historical American flag known as the Gadsden Flag. The Gadsden Flag is named after Christopher Gadsden, a Revolutionary War colonel who gave it to the commander-in-chief of the Continental Navy
2 before the Navy s first-ever mission in The flag is yellow and depicts a coiled rattlesnake above the words Don t Tread On Me. The Gadsden Flag is of particular importance, meaning and relevance to the New Rochelle Armory because it is one of only a few U.S. naval armories still in existence. Plaintiff s purpose in flying the Gadsden Flag at the Armory was to honor and represent our Nation s proud history and strength, as well as the sacrifices of the many Navy and Marine Corps veterans who have served under the Gadsden Flag throughout our Nation's history. After the City received numerous complaints about the Gadsden Flag displayed at the Armory, it was removed by the City, because the flag has become a libertarian symbol associated with the Tea Party and other political groups. One of the City Council members said the flag was divisive and represented a brand of politics that is very offensive to many people in America and many people in New Rochelle. The veterans group challenged the City s action under, among other things, 42 U.S.C for violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The relief the group sought included an order permanently enjoining the City from preventing it from flying the Gadsden Flag on the Armory flagpole. On the City s motion to dismiss, the Court held that New Rochelle has a valid interest in expressing the messages that it chooses through its flagpole, and may decide to avoid speech that it believes will be perceived by some of its constituents as divisive. Indeed, because it is the City not United Veterans that is perceived as the speaker, the city is the entity accountable for whatever message observers perceive in the Armory's flags. The Court reasoned that absent other speech restrictions, such as the Establishment Clause, case law showed the government is entitled to say what it wishes and to select the views that it wants to express. This is so even when the government was assisted by private sources in the transmission of its messages the First Amendment s Free Speech Clause did not apply to private speech taking place on government property. The Court cited as the leading authority on the government speech doctrine, the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 ruling in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 555 U.S. 460 (2009). In Summum, a private religious organization attempted to place a stone monument in a Utah city park that already had 15 monuments, including one of the Ten Commandments. Most were donated by private groups. Pleasant Grove City officials denied Summum s request. The group sued, saying the city engaged in viewpoint discrimination. The Supreme Court unanimously disagreed, saying that monuments on public property typically represent government speech, and therefore not subject to scrutiny under the Free Speech Clause. Here, the Court said Summum put considerable emphasis on whether, under the circumstances, a reasonable observer could conclude the government was the speaker, and that it was obvious that the flag would be regarded as government speech, noting there were numerous parallels with the Summum case.
3 The Court said it did not doubt the veterans group s sincerity when it said it flew the Gadsden Flag to honor veterans and the Nation's military history, but the message that the flag conveys cannot be determined by [the veterans group] or any speaker; it is in the eye of the beholder. Flags have great symbolic potential and can hold multiple meanings at the same time meanings that can shift over time, as apparently has happened to the Gadsden Flag as a result of its association in recent years with the Tea Party movement. Indeed, because it is the City not United Veterans that is perceived as the speaker, the City is the entity accountable for whatever message observers perceive in the Armory s flags. [The group is] not being prevented from expressing their own views through other channels they may fly the Gadsden flag on private property and in public fora. Their private speech is not being inhibited by the City s decision to take down the Gadsden Flag, but the City s expressive rights would be diminished were this Court to order the City to display the flag against its wishes. The Court in conclusion held that the display of the Gadsden Flag at the Armory was government speech, which is not regulated by the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment. For Whom the Tolls Swell? In Janes v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that New York s toll discounts for residents of certain locales neither violates the constitutional right to travel nor the dormant Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution WL (2d Cir. 2014). The U.S. Supreme Court has described the right to travel as follows: It protects the right of a citizen of one State to enter and to leave another State, the right to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than an unfriendly alien when temporarily present in the second State, and, for those travelers who elect to become permanent residents, the right to be treated like other citizens of that State. Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 500 (1999). The U.S. Constitution s Commerce Clause empowers Congress [t]o regulate Commerce among the several States. U.S. CONST. art. I, 8, cl. 3. Courts have also inferred the existence of a dormant Commerce Clause that imposes certain implicit limitations on state power:
4 Our dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence significantly limits the ability of States and localities to regulate or otherwise burden the flow of interstate commerce. It is driven by a concern about economic protectionism that is, regulatory measures designed to benefit in-state economic interests by burdening out-of-state competitors. McBurney v. Young, 133 S. Ct. 1709, 1719 (2013). The plaintiffs in this case are residents of New Jersey and New York challenging a Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority ( TBTA ) program that provides discounted tolls to residents of Staten Island, the Rockaway Peninsula, and Broad Channel Island for crossings over certain bridges. The discounted tolls, called Resident Discounts, allow residents of Staten Island to pay a reduced rate on the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, which serves as the only direct vehicular artery connecting Staten Island with the rest of New York City. The Resident Discounts also allow residents of Rockaway and Broad Channel to pay a reduced rate when crossing the Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge and the Cross Bay Veterans Memorial Bridge. The discount program was initiated in 1983, and last April, Gov. Andrew Cuomo granted a further reduction from $6 to $5.50 in the toll on the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge charged to Staten Island residents. The cash price is $15, and the E-Z Pass rate is $10.66 for nonresidents. Some trucks are eligible for a 20% discount. According to this recent decision, [p]laintiffs principal argument on appeal is that the toll discounts are predicated on an invidious distinction between residents and non-residents and thus violate their constitutional right to travel. In an earlier decision by this same Court, it held that where, as here, toll differentials amounted only to a minor restriction on travel, strict scrutiny review was not required. Strict scrutiny is a form of judicial review used by courts to determine the constitutionality of certain statutes. In contrast to other levels of scrutiny, for a statute to be deemed constitutional under strict scrutiny analysis, it must have been passed by the legislature to further a compelling governmental interest and must have been narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. Instead, a toll policy lacking the markers of invidious distinctions should be analyzed under the three-part test set forth in the U.S. Supreme Court s decision of Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. County of Kent, 510 U.S. 355 (1994). Under the Northwest Airlines test, the permissibility of fees charged for the use of state facilities is evaluated under three prongs, which ask whether the fee (1) is based on some fair approximation of use of the facilities, (2) is not excessive in relation to the benefits conferred, and (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce. 510 U.S. at 369. After analyzing the tolls under this test, the Court concluded in its prior ruling that the scheme at issue did not violate plaintiffs right to travel. Likewise, in this case, the Court concluded that the plaintiffs have presented no persuasive evidence showing that the discounts at issue here are materially different from those in [it s prior ruling] or that they present more than a minor restriction on travel. In fact, the tolls here amount to a smaller discount than the tolls in [the earlier ruling] when viewed in percentage terms. Moreover, the residents who qualified for the discounted tolls in [the prior ruling] and those who qualify in the instant case face comparable levels of geographical isolation. Similarly, the tolls charged in both [the prior ruling] and here are used to defray the cost of
5 bridges, and, in the present case, the facilities of a large integrated transportation system, the operation of which facilitates interstate travel. Finally, no evidence has been presented showing that even one traveler was meaningfully dissuaded from traveling interstate because of the tolls at issue. As for the dormant Commerce Clause challenge, the Court noted that the Supreme Court has explained that the central rationale for the dormant Commerce Clause is to prohibit state or municipal laws whose object is local economic protectionism, laws that would excite those jealousies and retaliatory measures the Constitution was designed to prevent. But the Commerce Clause does not invalidate all State restrictions on commerce. Analyzing the challenge under the same three-part test set forth in Northwest Airlines, the Court concluded that plaintiffs' dormant Commerce Clause challenge fails for the same reasons as does their right to travel claim. Illegal Tattoos In a new law that takes effect on April 14, 2015, the New York State Legislature has declared it illegal to get a tattoo or a piercing on your pet. Pets, or companion animals as the statute (N.Y. Agriculture and Markets Law 353-f) refers to them, means dogs or cats, as well as any other domesticated animal normally maintained in or near the household of the owner[.] Pets do not include farm animals, which include poultry, cattle, sheep, swine, goats, llamas, horses or fur bearing animals which are raised for commercial or subsistence purposes. The law carves out three exceptions: (1) tattoos performed by a veterinarian for medical purposes, (2) tattoos performed by businesses for identification purposes, where that business maintains an animal identification registry, or (3) a piercing to apply ear tags on rabbits. It reads: 1. No person shall pierce or cause to have pierced a companion animal unless such piercing provides a medical benefit to the companion animal. Such piercing shall be performed by a licensed veterinarian or under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian. Nothing in this section shall be construed to apply to ear tags on rabbits and cavies. 2. No person shall tattoo or cause to have tattooed a companion animal unless such tattoo:
6 (a) is done in conjunction with a medical procedure for the benefit of the companion animal and to indicate that such medical procedure has been done, provided that such tattoo is not for design purposes; or (b) is done for the purpose of identification of the companion animal and not for design purposes, and such tattoo includes only such numbers and/or letters allotted by a corporation that, in the regular course of its business, maintains an animal tattoo identification registry. The bill was introduced by Assembly member Linda B. Rosenthal, after hearing about a woman who was selling gothic kittens on the internet with piercings on their necks and down the length of their spines. Mahatma Gandhi did say: The greatness of a nation can be judged by the way its animals are treated. Original Content
Case 7:13-cv CS Document 43 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 16
Case 7:13-cv-05241-CS Document 43 Filed 12/22/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED VETERANS MEMORIAL AND PATRIOTIC ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW ROCHELLE and
More informationCase: 1:15-cv DAP Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/25/15 1 of 14. PageID #: 128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:15-cv-00822-DAP Doc #: 14 Filed: 08/25/15 1 of 14. PageID #: 128 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MELISSA ULLMO, ) Case No. 1:15 CV 822 ) Plaintiff, ) ) Judge
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 1:11-cv-00354 Doc #1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN COMMON SENSE PATRIOTS OF BRANCH COUNTY; BARBARA BRADY; and MARTIN
More informationIs it unconstitutional to display a religious monument, memorial, or other item on public property?
These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current state
More informationFree Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities
Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CITY ATTORNEYS DEPARTMENT September 19, 2013 A City May Sponsor an Expressive Program or Activity in Number of Ways
More informationCase: 1:15-cv DAP Doc #: 7 Filed: 06/01/15 1 of 28. PageID #: 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:15-cv-00822-DAP Doc #: 7 Filed: 06/01/15 1 of 28. PageID #: 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Melissa A. Ullmo v. Plaintiff, Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure
More informationSample Answers Spring 2009 Exam, QII (issue of the constitutionality of the PADOT regulations i. and ii. under the DCC)
Sample Answers Exam, QII (issue of the constitutionality of the PADOT regulations i. and ii. under the DCC) Sample Answer 1: Under the Dormant Commerce Clause (DCC), a state law or regulation that places
More informationFree Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities
Free Speech Rights at City-Sponsored Events and Facilities Thursday, September 19, 2013; 9:30 11:30 a.m. Randy E. Riddle, Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai League of California Cities 2013 Annual Conference;
More informationBackground. Lawsuit filed by TransCanada Power in US District Court in Massachusetts, alleging two Commerce Clause violations:
1 2 Background Lawsuit filed by TransCanada Power in US District Court in Massachusetts, alleging two Commerce Clause violations: Requirement for long term contracting limited to in-state generators Requirement
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG WEBBER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GILEAD, Petitioner, WINSTON SMITH, Respondent.
No. 13-9100 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG WEBBER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF GILEAD, Petitioner, v. WINSTON SMITH, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before LUCERO, BACHARACH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 8, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. Plaintiff - Appellee,
More informationRECENT UTAH AND WYOMING LAND USE CASES March 2015
RECENT UTAH AND WYOMING LAND USE CASES March 2015 Presented by: Cullen Battle Fabian & Clendenin 215 S. State St., Suite 1200 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 801-323-2255 cbattle@fabianlaw.com Time to Challenge
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:14-cv-00809-CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 14-cv-00809-CMA DEBRA
More informationJUNE 1999 NRPA LAW REVIEW COUNTY DESIGNATED NON-PUBLIC FORUM FOR RESIDENTS ONLY
COUNTY DESIGNATED NON-PUBLIC FORUM FOR RESIDENTS ONLY (NOTE The opinion described below was subsequently VACATED BY THE COURT on October 19, 1999 in Warren v. Fairfax County, 196 F.3d 186; 1999 U.S. App.
More informationF L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A bill to be entitled An act relating to animal abuser registration; creating s. 943.0425, F.S.; providing definitions; requiring the Department
More informationChapter 2 Constitutional Law
Chapter 2 Constitutional Law TRUEFALSE 1. A confederal form of government is a confederation of independent states with a central government of very limited powers. 2. In a federal form of government,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MIKE CAMPBELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:18-CV-04129-BCW ) CHERI TOALSON REISCH, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: June 19, 2017 Decided: February 23, 2018) Docket No.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 cr United States v. Holcombe Before: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: June 1, 01 Decided: February, 01) Docket No. 1 1 cr UNITED
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 14-144 In the Supreme Court of the United States JOHN WALKER III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. TEXAS DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC., ET AL.
More informationIntroduction. REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZ. What do we have? What can you do?
Introduction REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZ. What do we have? An over broad standard Can effect any city Has far reaching consequences What can you do? Take safe steps, and Wait for the inevitable clarification.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JASON KESSLER, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:17CV00056
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY
FILED NOV 0 PM : Hon. Beth M. Andrus KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --01- SEA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY MARK ELSTER and SARAH PYNCHON, Plaintiffs,
More informationDecember 2, 2015 VIA U.S. MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL. Chancellor Gene Block University of California Los Angeles Chancellor s Office
December 2, 2015 VIA U.S. MAIL & ELECTRONIC MAIL Chancellor Gene Block University of California Los Angeles Chancellor s Office Dear Chancellor Block, The undersigned national legal organizations the American
More informationNOTICES. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY [OFFICIAL OPINION NO. 96-l]
NOTICES OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL [OFFICIAL OPINION NO. 96-l] Department of Public Welfare; Enforceability of Durational Residency and Citizenship Requirement of Act 1996-35 December 9, 1996 Honorable
More informationRecent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations
Recent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations Deborah Fox, Principal Margaret Rosequist, Of Counsel September 28, 20 September 30, 2016 First Amendment Protected
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 14-1543 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RONALD S. HINES, DOCTOR OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, v. Petitioner, BUD E. ALLDREDGE, JR., DOCTOR OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition
More informationPanhandling Ordinances after Reed and Norton
Panhandling Ordinances after Reed and Norton Maria Davis, Assistant Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities The First Amendment prohibits laws abridging the freedom of speech and is applicable to states
More informationS T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE June 6, Opinion No.
S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL PO BOX 20207 NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37202 June 6, 2012 Opinion No. 12-59 Tennessee Residency Requirements for Alcoholic Beverages Wholesalers
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Cyberspace Communications, Inc., Arbornet, Marty Klein, AIDS Partnership of Michigan, Art on The Net, Mark Amerika of Alt-X,
More informationCRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma
Order Code RS22223 Updated October 8, 2008 Public Display of the Ten Commandments Summary Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney American Law Division In 1980, the Supreme Court held in Stone v. Graham
More informationCase 1:18-cv DJC Document 19 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:18-cv-11417-DJC Document 19 Filed 08/29/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) HAROLD SHURTLEFF et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 18-cv-11417-DJC
More informationOctober 15, By & U.S. Mail
(202) 466-3234 (202) 898-0955 (fax) www.au.org 1301 K Street, NW Suite 850, East Tower Washington, DC 20005 October 15, 2014 By Email & U.S. Mail Florida Department of Management Services Office of the
More informationMEMORANDUM. Nancy Fletcher, President, Outdoor Advertising Association of America. To: From: Laurence H. Tribe ~~- ~- ~ ~~- Date: September 11, 2015
HARVARD UNIVERSITY Hauser Ha1142o Cambridge, Massachusetts ozi38 tribe@law. harvard. edu Laurence H. Tribe Carl M. Loeb University Professor Tel.: 6i7-495-1767 MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Fletcher, President,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOES #1-5 and MARY DOE, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 12-11194 RICHARD SNYDER and COL. KRISTE ETUE, Defendants. / NOTICE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN DOE #1-5 and MARY DOE, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 12-11194 RICHARD SNYDER and COL. KRISTE ETUE, Defendants. / OPINION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION LOIS K. PERRIN # 8065 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, Hawaii 96801 Telephone: (808) 522-5900 Facsimile: (808) 522-5909 Email: lperrin@acluhawaii.org Attorney
More informationHamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP February 11, Original Content
HMYLAW Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP February 11, 2014 Original Content Village s Discriminatory Zoning Change Enjoined Broker Earned Commission Despite Seller s Resistance Workplace
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SNYDER Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-5037 CITY OF JOPLIN, MISSOURI, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Christopher
More informationOCTOBER 2010 LAW REVIEW PUBLIC LAND SWAP PRESERVES WAR MEMORIAL CROSS
PUBLIC LAND SWAP PRESERVES WAR MEMORIAL CROSS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2010 James C. Kozlowski The First Amendment "Establishment Clause" in the United States Constitution provides that "Congress
More informationSUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUBJECT: Conduct Second and Final Required Public Hearing and Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the Land Development Code to Address Alligator
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Mónica M. Ramírez* Cecillia D. Wang* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 1 Telephone: (1) -0 Facsimile: (1) -00 Email: mramirez@aclu.org Attorneys
More informationPublic Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols
Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney February 2, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. of the Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration entered on November 15, 2017, as
FILED DEC 0 AM :0 Honorable Beth Andrus KING COUNTY Dept. SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: --01- SEA SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY MARK ELSTER and SARAH PYNCHON, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationPublic Informational Hearing on the Transparency of Dairy Pricing December 9, 2009
Ross H. Pifer, Director Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center The Dickinson School of Law The Pennsylvania State University Lewis Katz Building University Park, PA 16802-1017 Tel: 814-865-3723
More informationIN YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF COMPELLED PROFESSIONAL SPEECH IN STUART v. CAMNITZ. Erin K.
IN YOUR PROFESSIONAL OPINION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF COMPELLED PROFESSIONAL SPEECH IN STUART v. CAMNITZ Erin K. Phillips Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 71 II. FACTUAL
More informationLaura Brown Chisolm. Prepared for National Center on Philanthropy and the Law Conference Political Activities: Nonprofit Speech October 29-30, 1998
A BRIEF AND SELECTIVE SURVEY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK RELEVANT TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF TAX EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Laura Brown Chisolm Prepared for National Center on Philanthropy
More informationCase 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 05/26/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC BRADLEY A. BENBROOK (SBN ) STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY (SBN 0) 00 Capitol Mall, Suite 0 Sacramento, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 brad@benbrooklawgroup.com
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS22405 March 20, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Military Recruiting and the Solomon Amendment: The Supreme Court Ruling in Rumsfeld v. FAIR Summary Charles V. Dale
More informationMay 21, The Honorable Orrin Hatch 104 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC Dear Senator Hatch,
May 21, 2018 The Honorable Orrin Hatch 104 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20005 Dear Senator Hatch, Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the Free Right to Expression in Education
More informationPart Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath
Libertarian Party of Ohio et al v. Husted, Docket No. 2:13-cv-00953 (S.D. Ohio Sept 25, 2013), Court Docket Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5
More informationYou Are What You Tweet: An Official Survival Guide
You Are What You Tweet: An Official Survival Guide Presented by: Kelly A. Trainer SOCIAL MEDIA IS AWESOME Have a direct line to constituents Tell your story without the media filtering it Target your message
More informationChapter 2 Constitutional Law
Chapter 2 Constitutional Law TRUEFALSE 1. A confederal form of government is a confederation of independent states with a central government of very limited powers. 2. In a federal form of government,
More informationCase 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUDGE:. Defendants.
Case 2:12-cv-02334 Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KELSEY NICOLE MCCAULEY, a.k.a. KELSEY BOHN, Versus Plaintiff, NUMBER: 12-cv-2334 JUDGE:.
More informationCase 0:07-cv JMR-FLN Document 41 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:07-cv-01789-JMR-FLN Document 41 Filed 10/29/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc., Civil No. 07-1789 (JMR/FLN) Plaintiff, v.
More informationLAW REVIEW, JULY 1995 ETHNIC GROUP DENIED PERMIT TO ERECT STATUTE OF POLITICAL FIGURE IN PARK
ETHNIC GROUP DENIED PERMIT TO ERECT STATUTE OF POLITICAL FIGURE IN PARK James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1995 James C. Kozlowski The El Comite decision described herein addresses alleged violations of the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:12-cv-00691-WKW-MHT-WHP Document 130 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et al.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:09-cv-01712 Document #: 74 Filed: 12/16/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:211 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL MOORE, et al, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) 09
More informationA QUICK OVERVIEW OF CONSTITTUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ISSUES IN THE UNITED STATES
A QUICK OVERVIEW OF CONSTITTUTIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ISSUES IN THE UNITED STATES 2012 Environmental, Energy and Resources Law Summit Canadian Bar Association Conference, Vancouver, April 26-27, 2012 Robin
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 2 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, JUDGE: Defendants.
Case 2:16-cv-17596 Document 2 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GARY BLITCH, DAVID KNIGHT, and DANIEL SNYDER, v. Plaintiffs, The CITY OF SLIDELL; FREDDY
More informationCommerce Clause Issues Raised in State RPS
Renewable Energy Markets 2010 Portland, Oregon 21 October 2010 Commerce Clause Issues Raised in State RPS Carolyn Elefant Law Offices of Carolyn Elefant Washington, DC 28 Headland Road Harpswell, ME 04079
More informationWhether Section 327 Professional Persons Legal Fees are the Cost of Doing Business in a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
2016 Volume VIII No. 1 Whether Section 327 Professional Persons Legal Fees are the Cost of Doing Business in a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Christopher Atlee F. Arcitio, J.D. Candidate 2017 Cite as: Whether Section
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-60355 Document: 00513281865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, Custodian, FBO Jean K. Thoden IRA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NEW GENERATION CHRISTIAN ) CHURCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) ROCKDALE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ) JURY DEMANDED
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 99-3434 Initiative & Referendum Institute; * John Michael; Ralph Muecke; * Progressive Campaigns; Americans * for Sound Public Policy; US Term
More informationCase 1:12-cv MCA-RHS Document 20 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:12-cv-00421-MCA-RHS Document 20 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOHN W. JACKSON and 2ND ) AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationCourthouse News Service
CAROL SURPRENANT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS Plaintiff, MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY and MASSACHUSETTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION The League of Women Voters, et al. Case No. 3:04CV7622 Plaintiffs v. ORDER J. Kenneth Blackwell, Defendant This is
More informationThe supervisor of elections is to assist the county property appraiser and the board of county
DE 78-32 - August 11, 1978 Special Districts; Water And Sewer District; Road And Bridge Tax District, Application Of Election Code To General Law; Elector Qualifications; Candidate Qualifications Procedures;
More informationCase 2:18-cv MCE-AC Document 26 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-mce-ac Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Laurance Lee, State Bar No. 0 Elise Stokes, State Bar No. Sarah Ropelato, State Bar No. th Street Sacramento, CA
More informationCase 1:09-cv LEK-RFT Document 32 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 13. Plaintiff, Defendants. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
Case 1:09-cv-00504-LEK-RFT Document 32 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EKATERINA SCHOENEFELD, Plaintiff, -against- 1:09-CV-0504 (LEK/RFT) STATE OF
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 09-4083 HOWARD YERGER; DONALD BORODKIN; ROBERT COLSON; JOHN DRIESSE; GORDON FRANK; DUNCAN FULLER; DR. CARMEN OCCHIUZZI; AMY THEOBALD, individually,
More informationNo. AMC3-SUP FOR THE APPELLATE MOOT COURT COLLEGIATE CHALLENGE JAMES INCANDENZA ENFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. AMC3-SUP 2016-37-02 FOR THE APPELLATE MOOT COURT COLLEGIATE CHALLENGE JAMES INCANDENZA Petitioner, v. ENFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Respondent. On Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh
More informationPresent: Hassell, C.J., Koontz, Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico and Lacy, S.JJ.
Present: Hassell, C.J., Koontz, Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico and Lacy, S.JJ. APPALACHIAN VOICES, ET AL. v. Record No. 081433 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS April 17, 2009 STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-04589-MHC Document 1 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SILVIA COTRISS, Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. CITY OF ROSWELL,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 13-481 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States JOHN G. ROWLAND, Former Governor of the State of Connecticut, and MARC S. RYAN, Former
More informationBusiness Law 210: Unit 2 Chapter 4: Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business
Business Law 210: Unit 2 Chapter 4: Constitutional Authority to Regulate Business [Professor Scott Bergstedt]: This is Chapter 4 constitutional law, the authority under the Constitution to regulate business.
More informationJOHN C. PARKINSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent. No
No. 17-1098 In The Supreme Court of the United States -------------------------- --------------------------- JOHN C. PARKINSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent. --------------------------
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 OPEN TEXT S.A., Plaintiff, v. ALFRESCO SOFTWARE LTD, et al., Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-jd ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 0
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-11-2008 Hogan v. Haddon Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-1039 Follow this and additional
More informationCase 1:15-cv LTS Document 80 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 8. No. 15 CV 3212-LTS
Case 1:15-cv-03212-LTS Document 80 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x HARBOUR VICTORIA INVESTMENT
More informationNos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. STEVE TRUNK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Case: 13-57126, 08/25/2016, ID: 10101715, DktEntry: 109-1, Page 1 of 19 Nos. 13-57126 & 14-55231 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVE TRUNK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
More informationNO In the Supreme Court of the United States. RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents.
NO. 06-1226 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONALD KIDWELL, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CITY OF UNION, OHIO, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of
More information[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No. 848 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 208th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 1998 SESSION
[First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY 0th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE SESSION Sponsored by: Assemblywoman CLARE M. FARRAGHER District (Monmouth) Assemblyman MICHAEL J. ARNONE
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 S 3 SENATE BILL 22 Commerce Committee Substitute Adopted 4/21/15 Third Edition Engrossed 4/22/15
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 S SENATE BILL Commerce Committee Substitute Adopted /1/ Third Edition Engrossed // Short Title: Historic Artifact Mgt. and Patriotism Act. (Public) Sponsors:
More informationCase 1:10-cv WDM-MEH Document 45 Filed 03/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18
Case 1:10-cv-00059-WDM-MEH Document 45 Filed 03/08/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Walker D. Miller Civil Action No. 10-cv-00059-WDM-MEH
More information2.2 The executive power carries out laws
Mr.Jarupot Kamklai Judge of the Phra-khanong Provincial Court Chicago-Kent College of Law #7 The basic Principle of the Constitution of the United States and Judicial Review After the thirteen colonies,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Thomas v. Schroer et al Doc. 163 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR., v. Plaintiff, JOHN SCHROER, Commissioner of Tennessee
More information2018 Ag Gag Update. J. David Aiken, UNL Ag Law Specialist ; October 3, of 14
2018 Ag Gag Update J. David Aiken, UNL Ag Law Specialist 402-472-1848; daiken@unl.edu October 3, 2018 1 of 14 2018 ag gag update We have two more federal court opinions regarding whether state ag gag statutes
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-35542 08/15/2011 08/29/2011 ID: 7857330 7874546 DktEntry: 41-1 42-2 Page: 1 of 67 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED AUG 15 2011 NAMPA CLASSICAL ACADEMY;
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-730 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON;
More informationCase 4:18-cv WTM-GRS Document 3 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00052-WTM-GRS Document 3 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION MICHELLE SOLOMON, ) GRADY ROSE, ALLISON SPENCER,
More information2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:09-cv-14190-GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOHN SATAWA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-14190 Hon. Gerald
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
John Doe v. Gossage Doc. 10 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV-070-M UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION JOHN DOE PLAINTIFF VS. DARREN GOSSAGE, In his official capacity
More informationAntitrust Modernization Commission Hearings Summary of Immunities and Exemptions: The State Action Doctrine. September 29, 2005
Antitrust Modernization Commission Hearings Summary of Immunities and Exemptions: The State Action Doctrine September 29, 2005 The Antitrust Modernization Commission held hearings on September 29, 2005
More information20 July Practice Group: Energy. By Ankur K. Tohan, Alyssa A. Moir, Gabrielle E. Thompson
20 July 2016 Practice Group: Energy Constitutional Limits to Greenhouse Gas Regulation: 8th Circuit Relies on the Dormant Commerce Clause to Reject Minnesota s GHG Limits on Imported Power By Ankur K.
More informationCourt of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont NO. 09-17-00366-CR NO. 09-17-00367-CR EX PARTE JOSEPH BOYD On Appeal from the 1A District Court Tyler County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 13,067 and
More informationWALKER V. TEXAS-DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC.: SPECIALTY LICENSE PLATES, CONFEDERATE FLAGS, AND GOVERNMENT SPEECH I.
Spring 2017 Schoen/35 WALKER V. TEXAS-DIVISION, SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC.: SPECIALTY LICENSE PLATES, CONFEDERATE FLAGS, AND GOVERNMENT SPEECH EDWARD J. SCHOEN * I. INTRODUCTION In a previous article
More informationMTA Legislation Submitted as part of the MTA 2016 Annual Report Pursuant to New York State Public Authorities Law Section 2800(1)(a)(10)
MTA Legislation Submitted as part of the MTA 2016 Annual Report Pursuant to New York State Public Authorities Law Section 2800(1)(a)(10) Metropolitan Transportation Authority MTA Legislation Submitted
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:17-cv-05595 Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1 Michael P. Hrycak NJ Attorney ID # 2011990 316 Lenox Avenue Westfield, NJ 07090 (908)789-1870 michaelhrycak@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs
More information