Introduction. REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZ. What do we have? What can you do?
|
|
- Brianna Bond
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 Introduction REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZ. What do we have? An over broad standard Can effect any city Has far reaching consequences What can you do? Take safe steps, and Wait for the inevitable clarification.
3 The Case The Good News Community Church, and its pastor Clyde Reed filed suit under 42 U.S.C against the Town of Gilbert in March Note: 1983 is a fee generating statute City won on S.J., and 9 th Circuit affirmed. The Supreme Court took the case, and ultimately reversed the lower court. This ruling settled a three way circuit split.
4 Factual Background The Good News Community Church used temporary signs to direct people to their Sunday worship. The Church was cited for exceeding the time limits for displaying temporary directional signs and for failing to include an event date on the signs. The town s sign code, imposed differing restrictions on the size, duration, and location of different types of temporary signs, including political signs, ideological signs, and directional signs relating to a qualifying event, such as a religious, charitable, or community event.
5 Facts Continued The Church and its pastor, Clyde Reed brought suit against the Town of Gilbert, claiming that the town s sign code abridged their freedom of speech. This differentiation among the types of signs was unconstitutional argued the Church. The sign code also exempted 23 categories of signs from that requirement.
6 Facts The Sign Code Temporary Directional Signs Relating to a Qualifying Event: Political Signs: Ideological Signs: This includes any Temporary Sign intended to direct pedestrians, motorists, and other passersby to a qualifying event. Basic signs, telling people where to go for an event, like a church. Treated less favorably than other types of signs. This included any temporary sign designed to influence the outcome of an election called by a public body. These signs were treated less favorably than ideological signs. This included any sign communicating a message or ideas for noncommercial purposes that is not... otherwise defined.
7 Maximum sign sizes in Gilbert Homeowners Assn signs Ideological signs Political signs (nonresidential zone) Qualifying Event signs
8 The Majority Opinion Justice Thomas wrote for the majority, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito, and Sotomayor. There were three concurring opinions, all of which limited the majority. More important later
9 The Majority Opinion SCOTUS held that the distinctions among signs was a content-based regulation of speech that did not survive strict scrutiny. Some circuits allowed differing regulations among signs, if the regulation were not adopted based on disagree[ment] with the message conveyed, and the justifications for regulating content were unrelated to the content of the sign.
10 Maj. Op. Cont. The Majority said this view skips the crucial first step in the content-neutrality analysis: determining whether the law is content neutral on its face. If the law is content based on its face then it is subject to strict scrutiny regardless of the government s benign motive, content-neutral justification, or lack of animus toward the ideas contained in the regulated speech.
11 The Court s Examples a law banning the use of sound trucks for political speech and only political speech would be a content-based regulation, even if it imposed no limits on the political viewpoints that could be expressed. The Town has ample content-neutral options available to resolve problems with safety and aesthetics. For example, its current Code regulates many aspects of signs that have nothing to do with a sign's message: size, building materials, lighting, moving parts, and portability.
12 Maj. Op. Outcome The Majority held that the distinctions among signs (Political, Ideological, Directional) was a content-based regulation of speech and thus the Code was subjected to strict scrutiny. The Town of Gilbert could not meet its burden to prove that its Sign Code was narrowly tailored to further a compelling government interest, and thus failed strict scrutiny.
13 The Concurring Opinions Three concurring opinions were penned in an attempt to limit the Majority Opinion: 1. One written by Justice Alito (joined by Justice Kennedy and Sotomayor), 2. One written by Kagan (joined by Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer), and 3. One written by Breyer alone. i. A total of 6 justices concurring.
14 Alito s Opinion Justice Alito wrote in an attempt to guide the majority opinion He gave a list of criterion which he deemed content neutral, and thus within a city s ability to regulate. Alito did not want to do away with the majority opinion, but had hope the opinion could be limited.
15 A New Hope: Alito s Criteria According to Alito, cities could still regulate: Rules regulating the size of signs; Rules regulating the locations in which signs may be placed; May distinguish between free-standing signs and those attached to buildings. Rules distinguishing between lighted and unlighted signs. Rules distinguishing between signs with fixed messages and electronic signs with messages that change.
16 Other Possible Regulations Alito According to Alito, cities could still regulate: Rules that distinguish between the placement of signs on private and public property. Rules distinguishing between the placement of signs on commercial and residential property. Rules distinguishing between on-premises and off-premises signs.
17 Other Possible Regulations Alito According to Alito, cities could still regulate: Rules restricting the total number of signs allowed per mile of roadway. Rules imposing time restrictions on signs advertising a one-time event. Rules of this nature do not discriminate based on topic or subject and are akin to rules restricting the times within which oral speech or music is allowed.
18 Properly understood, today's decision will not prevent cities from regulating signs in a way that fully protects public safety and serves legitimate esthetic objectives. Alito, Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Ariz., 135 S. Ct. 2218, (2015) (Alito, J., concurring).
19 Kagan s Opinion Kagan s concurrence, joined by Ginsburg and Breyer, did not join in the majority opinion Unlike Alito, Kennedy and Sotomayor Primarily Kagan s concurrence was written to note the possible downsides of the majority opinion.
20 Kagan s Opinion Countless cities and towns across America have adopted ordinances regulating the posting of signs, while exempting certain categories of signs based on their subject matter... Given the Court's analysis, many sign ordinances of that kind are now in jeopardy. As the years go by, courts will discover that thousands of towns have such ordinances, many of them entirely reasonable. And as the challenges to them mount, courts will have to invalidate one after the other. (This Court may soon find itself a veritable Supreme Board of Sign Review.)
21 Kagan s Standard Kagan argued for a more flexible approach than the one articulated by the majority. She argued that the Supreme Court may do well to relax our guard so that entirely reasonable laws imperiled by strict scrutiny can survive. These laws are likely those laws that will skew the public's debate of ideas. So when that risk is inconsequential,... strict scrutiny is unwarranted.
22 Breyer s Opinion Echoing Kagan, Breyer wrote largely disagreeing with the majority s reasoning. Breyer believes: First Amendment requires greater judicial sensitivity both to the Amendment's expressive objectives and to the public's legitimate need for regulation than a simple recitation of categories, such as content discrimination and strict scrutiny, would permit.
23 Breyer s Opinion Breyer argued for a different approach to content-based regulations. Instead of all content-based regulations being categorically subjected to strict scrutiny he wanted a more nuanced approach. The better approach is to generally treat content discrimination as a strong reason weighing against the constitutionality of a rule where a traditional public forum, or where viewpoint discrimination, is threatened...
24 Breyer s Opinion Breyer s rule could operate as rule of thumb in the other situations, finding it helpful but not a determinative legal tool, in an appropriate case, to determine the strength of a justification. Breyer s method as he put it would protect regulation of signage along the roadside, for purposes of safety and beautification... So does this mean these signs are in jeopardy?
25 Counting Justices While the Majority Opinion won today, there is hope. Alito, Kennedy, Sotomayor, Breyer, Kagan, and Ginsburg (6) concurred So should the right case come along it is likely that Reed would be limited, because currently 6 justices thought the case went too far (or in Alito s opinion, needed more specificity). Of the Majority s 6 Alito, Kennedy, and Sotomayor, could easily shift their ruling.
26 What has happened since Reed? Several district courts have begun applying Reed to every conceivable type of speech (except commercial speech, it remains easy to regulate) The Seventh Circuit took up an important solicitation case in light of Reed, and ruled against the municipality.
27 Norton v. City of Springfield, Ill. Anti-Panhandling / Solicitation Laws The ordinance in question applied only to panhandling through an oral request for an immediate donation of money. The ordinance expressly did not regulate: signs requesting donation, and oral pleas to send money later. The distinction between requests for money immediately and money later was facial speech discrimination under Reed, and as such the ordinance was required to meet strict scrutiny.
28 Norton v. City of Springfield, Ill. This case turned solely on the outcome in Reed v. Town of Gilbert. Prior to striking down the ordinance the Seventh Circuit had already held that the ordinance was content neutral. However, the Seventh Circuit waited until after Reed to rule on the rehearing. Then, in light of Reed, the Seventh Circuit found the ordinance a form of content based discrimination and unconstitutional.
29 District Court Cases
30 What has happened since Reed? Reed has been applied to a variety of speech cases, and any time that speech is at issue cities should think of Reed. Some of the situations where Reed has been applied to invalidate laws include: Election sign restrictions Robocalling laws Anti-panhandling ordinances Licensing of solicitor s by ordinance Laws preventing sharing election ballot photos State s regulation of an advice column from a purported psychologist
31 Solicitation laws In Working Am., Inc. v. City of Bloomington, Working America, an advocacy organization focusing on labor issues, challenged Bloomington's ordinance that requires certain door-to-door solicitors to obtain a solicitor's license prior to soliciting. The Bloomington ordinance only regulated certain types of solicitors, in particular those seeking to raise funds, whereas it exempt many others, this ensured that it would be treated as content based under Reed, and accordingly held unconstitutional. Id. Working Am., Inc. v. City of Bloomington, No. CV ADM/SER, 2015 WL , at *1 (D. Minn. Nov. 4, 2015).
32 Election Signs One court ruled that restrictions against temporary signs, including elections signs, are content based discrimination where those signs are treated differently than other types of temporary signs. Marin v. Town of Se., No. 14-CV-2094 KMK, 2015 WL , at *15 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2015).
33 Certain Robocalling laws The Fourth Circuit relying on Reed declared a South Carolina law prohibiting robocalls unconstitutional in Cahaly v. Larosa, 796 F.3d 399, 402 (4th Cir. 2015). The statute placed different restrictions on robocalls depending on whether they were (1) unsolicited and (2) made for consumer, political, or other purposes. Id.
34 How to avoid a Reed problem Step 1 Review and Redraft First, cities should thoroughly review their ordinances and identify any regulations that relate to speech (signage, panhandling, solicitation, etc.). Then the city should review these ordinances to determine if any regulations are content-based. These would include any regulations that are based on the content or subject of the message, the person and/or group delivering the message, or an event(s) taking place. Once identified, any content-based ordinance should not be enforced until the ordinance is redrafted, or the city determines it to be a valid content-based regulation in light of Reed.
35 How to avoid a Reed problem Step 2 Redraft and Add As you redraft signage codes, include strong, well-articulated purpose statement to pass constitutional muster. Although Reed rejected the notion that only a content neutral purpose is sufficient to withstand a First Amendment challenge, governmental intent remains an important factor in sign code drafting and litigation. Minimize categories and exceptions. The more categories, and exceptions, found in the code are more opportunities for content based distinctions. Focus on regulating non-content aspects of signs, such as: Number of signs Area Height Placement Lighting Movement Duration (permanent or temporary)
36 Substitution clauses Just in Case A substitution clause should be added to the sign ordinance. This allows any non-commercial sign to be permitted where commercial messages are allowed. This is to ensure that non-commercial messages are not ever treated worse than commercial messages, thereby invoking Reed concerns. Ex. Signs containing noncommercial speech are permitted anywhere that advertising or business signs are permitted, subject to the same regulations applicable to such signs. Also include a severability clause contained within the adopting ordinance.
37 You re in litigation, what now? Avoidance is the best method. So far no court has upheld a non-commercial content-based regulation since Reed, no defendant has been able to show that their regulation was the least restrictive means of achieving a compelling state interest. Frame the case. The last option is to frame the case so as to avoid Reed and strict scrutiny. If the ordinance only regulates commercial messages you should get intermediate scrutiny.
38 Conclusion The best strategy is avoidance. So far no court has upheld a non-commercial content-based regulation since Reed, No defendant has been able to show that their regulation furthers a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest... Any Questions?
SIGNS, SIGNS EVERYWHERE A SIGN: WHAT THE TOWN OF GILBERT CASE MEANS FOR SCHOOLS. Kristin M. Mackin SIMS MURRAY LTD.
SIGNS, SIGNS EVERYWHERE A SIGN: WHAT THE TOWN OF GILBERT CASE MEANS FOR SCHOOLS Kristin M. Mackin SIMS MURRAY LTD. First Amendment Governments shall make no law [1] respecting an establishment of religion,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Nancy Fletcher, President, Outdoor Advertising Association of America. To: From: Laurence H. Tribe ~~- ~- ~ ~~- Date: September 11, 2015
HARVARD UNIVERSITY Hauser Ha1142o Cambridge, Massachusetts ozi38 tribe@law. harvard. edu Laurence H. Tribe Carl M. Loeb University Professor Tel.: 6i7-495-1767 MEMORANDUM To: Nancy Fletcher, President,
More informationSign Regulation after Reed: Suggestions for Coping with Legal Uncertainty
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Law Faculty Articles and Essays Faculty Scholarship 9-14-2015 Sign Regulation after Reed: Suggestions for Coping with Legal Uncertainty Alan C. Weinstein
More information[Sample Public Presentation]
REED v. TOWN OF GILBERT THE BLOCKBUSTER DECISION [Sample Public Presentation] 2016 Presenter: William D. Brinton Rogers Towers, P.A. 1301 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 1500 Jacksonville, FL 32207 wbrinton@rtlaw.com
More informationSign Ordinances and Beyond: Reed v. Town of Gilbert
Sign Ordinances and Beyond: Reed v. Town of Gilbert Laura Mueller Associate Nicolas Lopez Law Clerk Texas Municipal Courts Education Center Prosecutors Conference 2017 State Regulation of City Regulation
More informationNovember 28, Elections Voting Places and Materials Therefor Placement of Political Signs during Election Period; Constitutionality
November 28, 2018 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 2018-16 The Honorable Blake Carpenter State Representative, 81st District 2425 N. Newberry, Apt. 3202 Derby, Kansas 67037 Re: Elections Voting Places and
More informationPanhandling Ordinances after Reed and Norton
Panhandling Ordinances after Reed and Norton Maria Davis, Assistant Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities The First Amendment prohibits laws abridging the freedom of speech and is applicable to states
More informationRecent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations
Recent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations Deborah Fox, Principal Margaret Rosequist, Of Counsel September 28, 20 September 30, 2016 First Amendment Protected
More informationRegulating the Traditional Public Forum & Annual Update of Missouri Land Use Cases
Regulating the Traditional Public Forum & Annual Update of Missouri Land Use Cases Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association July 16, 2016 Presented By: Steven Lucas Maggie Eveker Cunningham, Vogel & Rost,
More information2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE PERMANENT LAW REPORTS. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. Court
More informationPlanning Commission Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 South Meridian, Puyallup Wednesday, November 14, :30 PM
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 South Meridian, Puyallup Wednesday, November 14, 2018 6:30 PM ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION TOPICS 1.a Sign Regulation
More informationRecent Legislation and Court Decisions Impacting Delaware Municipalities
Recent Legislation and Court Decisions Impacting Delaware Municipalities Max B. Walton Connolly Gallagher LLP 302-888-6297 mwalton@connollygallagher.com October 2, 2015 2 TOPICS I. First Amendment/Free
More informationAnnual Update of Supreme Court and Missouri Land Use Cases
Annual Update of Supreme Court and Missouri Land Use Cases Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association July 11, 2015 Presented By: Steve Chinn Steven Lucas Stinson Leonard Street LLP Cunningham, Vogel & Rost,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:15-cv-01219-SDM-AAS Document 71 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1137 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION HOMELESS HELPING HOMELESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CASE
More informationVIEW OF THE INDUSTRY
Arkansas City Attorney s Association Summer 2016 CLE Program Re-examining Sign Regulations after Reed v. Town of Gilbert Speakers: William D. Brinton, Esquire, Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, FL Arkansas
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Case 1:14-cv-00809-CMA Document 15 Filed 03/21/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 14-cv-00809-CMA DEBRA
More informationMAYOR AND BOARD OF A LDERMEN. Submitted By: Rachel S. Depo, Assistant City Attorney Date: 6/3/2016
Item 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAYOR AND BOARD OF A LDERMEN Submitted By: Rachel S. Depo, Assistant City Attorney Date: 6/3/2016 Meeting Dates Workshop: 6/8/2016 Business Meeting: Public Meeting: Agenda Item:
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13-502 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PASTOR CLYDE REED;
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JASON KESSLER, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:17CV00056
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Thomas v. Schroer et al Doc. 163 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION WILLIAM H. THOMAS, JR., v. Plaintiff, JOHN SCHROER, Commissioner of Tennessee
More informationSelected Cases From The United States Supreme Court Term. Pupilage 6
Thurgood Marshall Inn of Court May 27, 2015 Phoenix, Arizona Selected Cases From The 2014-2015 United States Supreme Court Term Pupilage 6 Overview Discussion limited to selected cases, pending or issued,
More informationSign Regulations: The Implications of Reed v. Town of Gilbert
Sign Regulations: The Implications of Reed v. Town of Gilbert William D. Brinton, Esq. Rogers Towers, P.A. -and- Lanny D. Richmond II, Esq. Staff Attorney Arkansas Municipal League Arkansas City Attorney
More informationBy: Mariana Gaxiola-Viss 1. Before the year 2002 corporations were free to sponsor any
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 Violates Free Speech When Applied to Issue-Advocacy Advertisements: Fed. Election Comm n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 127 S. Ct. 2652 (2007). By: Mariana Gaxiola-Viss
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 14. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case: 1:17-cv-00410 Doc #: 1 Filed: 02/28/17 1 of 14. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO JOHN MANCINI, and NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, Plaintiffs,
More informationSupreme Court Decisions
Hoover Press : Anderson DP5 HPANNE0900 10-04-00 rev1 page 187 PART TWO Supreme Court Decisions This section does not try to be a systematic review of Supreme Court decisions in the field of campaign finance;
More informationCase 2:18-cv MCE-AC Document 26 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-00-mce-ac Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Laurance Lee, State Bar No. 0 Elise Stokes, State Bar No. Sarah Ropelato, State Bar No. th Street Sacramento, CA
More informationSign of the Times: Local Sign Ordinances Following Reed v. Town ofgilbert
Sign of the Times: Local Sign Ordinances Following Reed v. Town ofgilbert Presented By: G. Gregory Kamptner, Deputy County Attorney County of Albemarle Adam D. Melita, Deputy City Attorney City of Norfolk
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION. VICTOR GRESHAM and CONQUEST COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC
Gresham et al v. Rutledge Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION VICTOR GRESHAM and CONQUEST COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC PLAINTIFFS v. No. 4:16CV00241 JLH
More informationMcDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)
Street Law Case Summary Argued: March 2, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010 Background The Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, but there has been an ongoing national debate
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 17-2196 VERONICA PRICE, et al., v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States
More informationCase: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 16 Filed: 04/07/17 1 of 11. PageID #: 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:17-cv-00410-DCN Doc #: 16 Filed: 04/07/17 1 of 11. PageID #: 94 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOHN MANCINI et al. v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CLEVELAND,
More informationBy Jane Lynch and Jared Wagner
Can police obtain cell-site location information without a warrant? - The crossroads of the Fourth Amendment, privacy, and technology; addressing whether a new test is required to determine the constitutionality
More informationUnit 7 SG 1. Campaign Finance
Unit 7 SG 1 Campaign Finance I. Campaign Finance Campaigning for political office is expensive. 2016 Election Individual Small Donors Clinton $105.5 million Trump 280 million ($200 or less) Individual
More informationPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No CENTRAL RADIO COMPANY INC; ROBERT WILSON; KELLY DICKINSON,
Appeal: 13-1996 Doc: 61 Filed: 01/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1996 CENTRAL RADIO COMPANY INC; ROBERT WILSON; KELLY DICKINSON, Plaintiffs -
More informationMARGARET W. ROSEQUIST
MARGARET W. ROSEQUIST Margaret (Meg) Rosequist is a member of Meyers Nave s First Amendment Practice Group and Trial and Litigation Practice Group. Her practice focuses on both litigation and advisory
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 15 1293 JOSEPH MATAL, INTERIM DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, PETITIONER v. SIMON SHIAO TAM ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Mónica M. Ramírez* Cecillia D. Wang* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT Drumm Street San Francisco, CA 1 Telephone: (1) -0 Facsimile: (1) -00 Email: mramirez@aclu.org Attorneys
More informationAlso present were Bill Mann, Director of Planning and Recording Secretary Amber Lehman.
Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting held Wednesday, November 4, 2015, at 7:00P.M. in the Council Chambers, 11 North 3rd Street, Jacksonville Beach, Florida JACI
More informationAre We There Yet? The Roberts Court, Race & Post Integration America: A Selective View of Three Supreme Court Cases
Are We There Yet? The Roberts Court, Race & Post Integration America: A Selective View of Three Supreme Court Cases Francisco M. Negrón, Jr. Associate Executive Director & General Counsel National School
More informationCase: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 66 Filed: 12/17/15 Page 1 of 11
Case: 3:15-cv-00324-jdp Document #: 66 Filed: 12/17/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ONE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE, INC., CITIZEN ACTION OF WISCONSIN
More informationWhat s So Special About Treaty Arbitration?: U.S. Supreme Court Confronts Its First International Investment Treaty Arbitration Case
What s So Special About Treaty Arbitration?: U.S. Supreme Court Confronts Its First International Investment Treaty Arbitration Case BY IGOR V. TIMOFEYEV, JOSEPH R. PROFAIZER & DANIEL PRINCE December 2013
More informationS P I E G E L & M C D I A R M I D LLP E Y E S T R E E T, N W S U I T E W A S H I N G T O N, D C
MEMORANDUM S P I E G E L & M C D I A R M I D LLP 1 8 7 5 E Y E S T R E E T, N W S U I T E 7 0 0 W A S H I N G T O N, D C 2 0 0 0 6 T E L E P H O N E 2 0 2. 879. 4000 F A C S I M I L E 2 0 2. 393. 2866
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. No. 4:16CV00241 JLH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS, WESTERN DIVISION U.S. Dist.
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT VICTOR GRESHAM and CONQUEST COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, LLC, PLAINTIFFS v. LESLIE RUTLEDGE, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Arkansas, DEFENDANT No. 4:16CV00241
More informationCase 2:12-cv Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JUDGE:. Defendants.
Case 2:12-cv-02334 Document 1 Filed 09/21/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KELSEY NICOLE MCCAULEY, a.k.a. KELSEY BOHN, Versus Plaintiff, NUMBER: 12-cv-2334 JUDGE:.
More informationANNUAL UPDATE OF SUPREME COURT AND MISSOURI LAND USE CASES
ANNUAL UPDATE OF SUPREME COURT AND MISSOURI LAND USE CASES Missouri Municipal Attorneys Association July 11, 2015 STEVE CHINN STINSON LEONARD STREET, LLP 1201 Walnut, Suite 2900 Kansas City, Missouri 64106
More informationLocal Regulation of Billboards:
Local Regulation of Billboards: Settled and Unsettled Legal Issues Frayda S. Bluestein Local ordinances regulating billboards, like other local land use regulations, must strike a balance between achieving
More informationNOTE. FREE SPEECH DOCTRINE AFTER REED v. TOWN OF GILBERT
NOTE FREE SPEECH DOCTRINE AFTER REED v. TOWN OF GILBERT After Justice Scalia s death, it seems everything is up for grabs: gun rights, reproductive rights, voting rights, environmental protection, labor
More informationCase 2:18-at Document 1 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 12
Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Laurance Lee, State Bar No. 0 Elise Stokes, State Bar No. Sarah Ropelato, State Bar No. th Street Sacramento, CA Telephone:
More informationCase 3:15-cv VC Document 72 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 3:15-cv-03392-VC Document 72 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION BAY AREA, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF OAKLAND, Defendant.
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 13-502 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States PASTOR CLYDE REED AND GOOD NEWS COMMUNITY CHURCH, Petitioners, v. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZONA AND ADAM ADAMS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CODE COMPLIANCE
More informationRecent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons
1 April 28, 2017 League-L Email Newsletter Recent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons By Claire Silverman, Legal Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities
More informationTWELFTH ANNUAL WILLIAMS INSTITUTE MOOT COURT COMPETITION Index of Key Cases Contents
Contents Cases for Procurement Act Question (No. 1) 1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) (Jackson, J., concurring). 2. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979). 3. Chamber of
More informationCase: Document: 12 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pages: 120. No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-3055 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT LEIBUNDGUTH STORAGE & VAN SERVICE, INC., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE, an Illinois municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 99-3434 Initiative & Referendum Institute; * John Michael; Ralph Muecke; * Progressive Campaigns; Americans * for Sound Public Policy; US Term
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-teh Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COLIN R. BRICKMAN, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-teh ORDER DENYING FACEBOOK
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Shover, 2012-Ohio-3788.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 25944 Appellee v. SEAN E. SHOVER Appellant APPEAL
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 2 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiffs, JUDGE: Defendants.
Case 2:16-cv-17596 Document 2 Filed 12/19/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GARY BLITCH, DAVID KNIGHT, and DANIEL SNYDER, v. Plaintiffs, The CITY OF SLIDELL; FREDDY
More informationMEMORANDUM. June 30, From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2008
MEMORANDUM June 30, 2009 From: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and SCOTUSblog.com Re: End of Term Statistical Analysis October Term 2008 This memo presents the firm s annual summary of relevant statistics
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLYDE REED, Pastor and GOOD NEWS COMMUNITY CHURCH, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TOWN OF GILBERT, ARIZONA and ADAM ADAMS, in his official
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Case No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., et al., v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 5:16-CV-252 (JCD) JEFFERSON
More informationCase: 4:18-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/02/18 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case: 4:18-cv-00003 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 01/02/18 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION LAWRENCE WILLSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case
More informationPackingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct (2017) ABSTRACT
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SEX OFFENSES AND FREE SPEECH: CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BAN ON SEX OFFENDERS USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA: IMPACT ON STATES WITH SIMILAR RESTRICTIONS Packingham v. North Carolina, 137 S. Ct. 1730
More informationWilliams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar: Judicial Elections as the Exception
Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar: Judicial Elections as the Exception ANDREW LESSIG I.) Introduction On April 19, 2015, the United States Supreme Court handed down their decision in Williams-Yulee v.
More informationNaturist Society advocates a "clothing optional" lifestyle and educates the public through writings, lectures, and public demonstrations
NATURIST SOCIETY v.fillyaw 858 F.Supp. 1559 (S.D. Fla. 1994) Naturist Society advocates a "clothing optional" lifestyle and educates the public through writings, lectures, and public demonstrations plaintiffs
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SNYDER Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-5037 CITY OF JOPLIN, MISSOURI, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Christopher
More informationORDINANCE 11-O-14 { }{
ORDINANCE 11-O-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CRYSTAL RIVER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, OF THE CITY OF CRYSTAL RIVER, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING APPENDIX A, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER
More informationMay 31, Gary O. Bartlett Executive Director State Board of Elections P.O. Box Raleigh, North Carolina
May 31, 2012 Gary O. Bartlett Executive Director State Board of Elections P.O. Box 27255 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7255 cc: Don Wright, General Counsel Mr. Bartlett: Re: The Use of Churches as Polling
More informationInternational Municipal Lawyers Association. Recent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations
International Municipal Lawyers Association 2016 Annual Conference San Diego, CA Recent Developments in First Amendment Law: Panhandling and Solicitation Regulations Deborah J. Fox, Principal Margaret
More informationThe Old York Review Board. No Sheldon Hooper, Defendant Appellant. Old York Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Commission
The Old York Review Board No. 2011-650 Sheldon Hooper, Defendant Appellant v. Old York Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Commission Plaintiff Appellee. Argued November 2011 Decided April 2012 OPINION:
More informationUnited States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171, (1983); Perry Educ. Ass n v. Perry Local Educators Ass n, 460 U.S. 37, 45 (1983).
MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: The National Press Photographers Association Kurt Wimmer and John Blevins Rights of Journalists on Public Streets Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, photojournalists
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 09-751 Supreme Court of the United States ALBERT SNYDER, v. Petitioner, FRED W. PHELPS, SR., et al. Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Brief
More informationThe Federal Courts. Chapter 16
The Federal Courts Chapter 16 3 HISTORICAL ERAS OF INFLUENCE 1787-1865 Political Nation building (legitimacy of govt.) Slavery 1865-1937 Economic Govt. roll in economy Great Depression 1937-Present Ideological
More informationMAY 2012 LAW REVIEW FESTIVAL POLICY SILENCES ANNOYING PREACHING
FESTIVAL POLICY SILENCES ANNOYING PREACHING James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2012 James C. Kozlowski The First Amendment prohibits the suppression of free speech activities by government. Further, when
More informationCase 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29
Case 1:10-cv-00135-RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 John E. Bloomquist James E. Brown DONEY CROWLEY BLOOMQUIST PAYNE UDA P.C. 44 West 6 th Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1185 Helena, MT 59624
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS22405 March 20, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Military Recruiting and the Solomon Amendment: The Supreme Court Ruling in Rumsfeld v. FAIR Summary Charles V. Dale
More informationItem 8C 1 of 17
MEETING DATE: January 27, 2016 PREPARED BY: Kathy Hollywood City Clerk DEPT. DIRECTOR: Kathy Hollywood DEPARTMENT: City Clerk CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: Adoption of City Council Ordinance No.
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT LEON H. RIDEOUT; ANDREW LANGOIS; BRANDON D. ROSS. Plaintiff - Appellees
Case: Case: 15-2021 15-2021 Document: Document: 00116972853 34 Page: Page: 1 Date 1 Filed: Date Filed: 03/09/2016 03/10/2016 Entry Entry ID: 5983090 ID: 5983392 No. 15-2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationThe Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: Selected Opinions on the Jury s Role in Criminal Sentencing
The Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: Selected Opinions on the Jury s Role in Criminal Sentencing Anna C. Henning Legislative Attorney June 7, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. STEVE GALLION, Plaintiff-Respondent, and
Case: 18-55667, 09/07/2018, ID: 11004072, DktEntry: 14-1, Page 1 of 4 No. 18-55667 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVE GALLION, Plaintiff-Respondent, and UNITED STATES OF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationTHE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH: THE FEDERAL COURTS DUAL COURT SYSTEM There are really two court systems in the United States National judiciary that extends over all 50 States Court systems found in each State (most
More informationCase 4:18-cv WTM-GRS Document 3 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00052-WTM-GRS Document 3 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA SAVANNAH DIVISION MICHELLE SOLOMON, ) GRADY ROSE, ALLISON SPENCER,
More informationElections and the Courts. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center
Elections and the Courts Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center lsoronen@sso.org Overview of Presentation Recent cases in the lower courts alleging states have limited access to voting on a racially
More informationFREE SPEECH LAW FOR ON PREMISE SIGNS Daniel R. Mandelker 2016 REVISED EDITION
FREE SPEECH LAW FOR ON PREMISE SIGNS Daniel R. Mandelker 2016 REVISED EDITION FREE SPEECH LAW FOR ON PREMISE SIGNS By Daniel R. Mandelker Stamper Professor of Law Washington University in Saint Louis United
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Case No NIKKI BRUNI; JULIE COSENTINO; CYNTHIA RINALDI; KATHLEEN
Case: 15-1755 Document: 003112028455 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Case No. 15-1755 NIKKI BRUNI; JULIE COSENTINO; CYNTHIA RINALDI; KATHLEEN LASLOW;
More information2018 Jackson Lewis P.C.
2017 Jackson Lewis P.C. 2018 THE MATERIALS CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION WERE PREPARED BY THE LAW FIRM OF JACKSON LEWIS P.C. FOR THE PARTICIPANTS OWN REFERENCE IN CONNECTION WITH EDUCATION SEMINARS PRESENTED
More information2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
2:09-cv-14190-GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOHN SATAWA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-14190 Hon. Gerald
More informationThree Provocative Business Bankruptcy Decisions of 2018
Alert Three Provocative Business Bankruptcy Decisions of 2018 June 25, 2018 The appellate courts are usually the last stop for parties in business bankruptcy cases. The courts issued at least three provocative,
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, INC.; BARRY HESS; PETER SCHMERL; JASON AUVENSHINE; ED KAHN, Plaintiffs, vs. JANICE K. BREWER, Arizona Secretary of State, Defendant.
More informationHealth Policy: National Issues Litigation Concerning Health Care Reform. Robert Schapiro April 11, 2012
Health Policy: National Issues Litigation Concerning Health Care Reform Robert Schapiro April 11, 2012 Health Care Issues 50 million people without health insurance Federal and state laws require treatment
More informationChapter 13: The Judiciary
Learning Objectives «Understand the Role of the Judiciary in US Government and Significant Court Cases Chapter 13: The Judiciary «Apply the Principle of Judicial Review «Contrast the Doctrine of Judicial
More information2:16-cv DCN Date Filed 03/07/16 Entry Number 15-1 Page 1 of 18
2:16-cv-00264-DCN Date Filed 03/07/16 Entry Number 15-1 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION KIMBERLY BILLUPS, MICHAEL ) WARFIELD AND
More informationINTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15
INTRO TO POLI SCI 11/30/15 Objective: SWBAT describe the type of court system in the US and how the Supreme Court works. Agenda: Turn in Late Work Judicial Branch Notes When your friend asks to borrow
More informationWITH THE BEST OF INTENTIONS: FIRST AMENDMENT PITFALLS FOR GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF SIGNAGE AND NOISE
WITH THE BEST OF INTENTIONS: FIRST AMENDMENT PITFALLS FOR GOVERNMENT REGULATION OF SIGNAGE AND NOISE Karen Zagrodny Consalo I. INTRODUCTION A basic tenant of American jurisprudence is the protection of
More informationCampaign Finance Law and the Constitutionality of the Millionaire s Amendment : An Analysis of Davis v. Federal Election Commission
Order Code RS22920 July 17, 2008 Summary Campaign Finance Law and the Constitutionality of the Millionaire s Amendment : An Analysis of Davis v. Federal Election Commission L. Paige Whitaker Legislative
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT APPELLEES RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS MOTION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC
Appellate Case: 14-3246 Document: 01019343568 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 Kail Marie, et al., UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Case No. 14-3246 Robert Moser,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT January 17, 2017 FINAL EXIT NETWORK, INC., PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner, v. Appellate Court Case No. A15-1826 Date of Filing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12-cv GCM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:12-cv-00192-GCM NORTH CAROLINA CONSTITUTION ) PARTY, AL PISANO, NORTH ) CAROLINA GREEN PARTY, and ) NICHOLAS
More informationCase 2:14-cv CB Document 84 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:14-cv-01197-CB Document 84 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NIKKI BRUNI, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.
More informationA well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed Heller v. District of Columbia 128 S. Ct. 2783, 2821 (2008)
More information