Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath"

Transcription

1 Libertarian Party of Ohio et al v. Husted, Docket No. 2:13-cv (S.D. Ohio Sept 25, 2013), Court Docket Part Description 1 10 pages 2 Exhibit Consent Decree 3 Affidavit Knedler 4 Affidavit Harris 5 Affidavit Earl 6 Affidavit Redpath Multiple Documents 2013 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. Terms of Service // PAGE 1

2 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 65 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:13-cv-953 v. JUDGE WATSON JON HUSTED, Defendant, and STATE OF OHIO, Intervenor-Defendant. / PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO SECRETARY'S AND OHIO'S RESPONSES I. The Secretary Cannot Legally Enforce Ohio's New Residence Requirement. Defendant-Secretary of State (hereinafter "the Secretary") argues that he is "compel[led]" to enforce O.R.C , the target of this litigation, by Ohio law. See Secretary of State Jon Husted's Brief Concerning Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (hereinafter "Secretary's Response") (Doc. No. 13) at 1 (quoting O.R.C (M)). Plaintiffs agree that the Secretary is the chief election officer in Ohio and is ordinarily compelled to enforce Ohio's election laws. However, Ohio's enforcement requirement must give way to the First Amendment and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const., art. VI. To the extent Ohio's residence requirement contradicts the First Amendment and the Sixth Circuit's holding in Nader v. Blackwell, 545 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2008), the Secretary is relieved of its obligation under Ohio law. 1

3 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 10 PAGEID #: 66 Moreover, the Secretary four years ago entered into a consent decree in Moore v. Brunner, No. 2:08-cv-224 (S.D. Ohio, July 20, 2009) (an official-capacity action brought against the Secretary by a candidate challenging Ohio's residency restriction for circulators), "agree[ing] that O.R.C (A)'s residence and voter registration requirements for circulators of candidates' petitions are, together and/or separately, unconstitutional under the First Amendment," and "agree[ing] that she will not enforce" them. See Consent Decree at 2 (Exhibit 1). 1 The challenge there was to the same residency requirement later invalidated in Nader v. Blackwell. The version of O.R.C (A) challenged in Moore, just like the version of challenged in Nader v. Blackwell, provided that one was not eligible to be a circulator unless the person is registered as an elector and will have resided in the county and precinct where the person is registered for at least thirty days at the time of the next election. 2 The Secretary should not be allowed to seek shelter under a new version of the same requirement. Enforcing Ohio's new residency requirement might even be deemed a contempt of the consent decree entered by Judge Sargus 3 in Moore v. Brunner. 1 The statute had been preliminarily enjoined by Judge Frost in Moore v. Brunner, No. 2:08-cv- 224 (S.D. Ohio, June 2, 2008) (2008 WL ), four months before Nader v. Blackwell was handed down by the Sixth Circuit. The matter was later reassigned to Judge Sargus, who entered the consent decree described above to conclude the litigation. See Exhibit 1. 2 The only difference between the version of challenged in Nader and that challenged in Moore was that on May 2, 2006 the statute was amended to relieve circulators of initiatives of the registration requirement. Nader challenged the version in place in 2004; Moore challenged the version in place in The matter was later reassigned to Judge Sargus, who entered the consent decree to conclude the litigation. 2

4 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 3 of 10 PAGEID #: 67 II. Plaintiffs Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Relief is Timely. Intervenor, the State of Ohio (hereinafter "Ohio"), suggests that Plaintiffs' Complaint is not timely. See Intervenor-Defendant the State of Ohio's Memorandum Contra Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (hereinafter (Ohio's Response") (Doc. No. 14), at 2 ("nearly six months after S.B. 47 passed... Plaintiffs filed a Complaint"). As Ohio itself concedes, however, S.B. 47's changes to O.R.C did not take effect until June 21, It was not until September 3, 2013, just three weeks before this action was filed, that the Secretary published Directive , stating that that "[a] circulator must be at least 18 years of age and an Ohio resident." Ohio Secretary of State Directive (Sep. 3, 2013) 4 at 1. This is the Directive that effectively rescinded Directive , released on January 31, 2013, which stated "[t]he circulator of a candidate s petition does not have to be an Ohio resident or Ohio elector under the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Nader v. Blackwell, 545 F.3d 459 (2008)." Ohio Secretary of State Directive (Jan. 31, 2013) 5 at 2. Plaintiffs' challenge was thus filed less than three months after the new O.R.C (C)(1) took effect and only three weeks after the Secretary rescinded Directive 's interpretation of Ohio law The Secretary published an Advisory on June 21, 2013, the day the changes took effect, stating that "[t]he circulator of any petition must be at least 18 years of age." Ohio Secretary of State Advisory ( at 1. It is not clear, however, what effect an Advisory has on a Directive under Ohio law. In any event, Plaintiffs were not aware of this Advisory. See Second Declaration of Kevin Knedler at 5-8 (Exhibit 2); Second Declaration of Aaron Harris at 6-7 (Exhibit 3); Second Declaration of Charlie Earl at 5-7 (Exhibit 4). 3

5 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 4 of 10 PAGEID #: 68 Plaintiffs, for their part, had no actual knowledge of the changes to O.R.C until September of See Second Declaration of Kevin Knedler at 5-8 (Exhibit 2); Second Declaration of Aaron Harris at 6-7 (Exhibit 3); Second Declaration of Charlie Earl at 5-7 (Exhibit 4). There was no reason, moreover, Plaintiffs should have become aware of the changes earlier--that is, in late-june, July or August. Primary candidates do not as a rule begin circulating petitions for a Spring primary during the "dog days" of Summer. Plaintiff-Earl, for example, did not begin circulating nominating petitions until September. See Second Declaration of Charlie Earl at 5-7 (Exhibit 4). Even those, like Plaintiff-Harris, who began collecting signatures as early as August, see Second Declaration of Aaron Harris at 6-7 (Exhibit 3), did not know of Ohio's new prohibition. Id. The LPO and its members had no reason to think before September that the Secretary's January 31, 2013 Directive had changed. Once they learned of the change they immediately filed this suit. The Plaintiffs' Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, having come quickly on the heels of O.R.C (C)(1)'s effective date and the Secretary's rescission of his prior Directive, and immediately following the Plaintiffs' having learned of O.R.C (C)(1)'s new residence requirement, is thus timely. III. Plaintiffs Will Suffer Irreparable Injury. Ohio argues that Plaintiffs have "fail[ed] to make any allegation of anticipated harm from the residency requirement." Ohio's Response at 9 (italics omitted). Ohio further asserts that "even if they had, any harm to Plaintiffs would be speculative at this point because Plaintiffs can still use speakers they want to convey their message and may still get their candidates on the ballot." Ohio's Response at 11. 4

6 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 5 of 10 PAGEID #: 69 The first charge, that Plaintiffs have failed to allege harm, is demonstrably false. Plaintiffs' Complaint states that LPO candidates, including Plaintiff-Earl and Plaintiff-Harris, seek to use non-residents to circulate their nominating petitions but cannot because of O.R.C (C)(1). See Complaint (Doc. No. 1) at 11& 12. Counts One and Two of the Complaint then assert that prohibiting candidates from using non-residents to circulate their nominating petitions violates the Plaintiffs' First Amendment rights, both facially and as-applied. See Complaint (Doc. No. 1) at These allegations of direct, immediate harm to First Amendment rights, i.e., not being able to use non-residents to advance "core" political activities, are supported by the Declarations filed by Plaintiffs. Plaintiff-Earl declares that he would use non-resident circulators but cannot because of O.R.C (C)(1). See Declaration of Charlie Earl (Doc. No. 10) at 6-8. Plaintiff-Knedler, who has full authority to represent the LPO, asserts that LPO candidates are required by Ohio law to collect signatures using circulators in order to gain access to Ohio's primary ballot. See Declaration of Kevin Knedler (Doc. No.9) at LPO candidates have used non-residents in the past, id. at 14, and cannot now. Id. at 15. LPO candidates want to use non-residents. Id. at Non-residents want to assist LPO candidates. See Declaration of William Redpath at 4-6 (Exhibit 5). The second charge, that Plaintiffs' First Amendment injuries are not irreparable (because Plaintiffs can still use resident-circulators) finds absolutely no support in the many precedents 7 Further, non-resident circulators have an advantage over resident circulators under Ohio law; the former are not restricted by political affiliation. Id. at Residents, in contrast, cannot be members of another political party. Consequently, non-resident circulators have "proven very useful to LPO candidates." Id. at 24. 5

7 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 6 of 10 PAGEID #: 70 generated by residency restrictions. One example is the Fourth Circuit's holding in Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Judd, 718 F.3d 308, 312 (4th Cir. 2013), which invalidated Virginia's residency requirement for circulators of parties' and candidates' nominating petitions. Virginia's defense in that case was "premised entirely on its assertion that the plaintiffs have not suffered a legally cognizable injury and thus lack standing to sue." Virginia, like Ohio here, argued that the Libertarian Party of Virginia (LPVA) "has succeeded in placing its presidential candidate on the Virginia ballot since 1992," and that "resident circulators were actively collecting signatures throughout the 2012 petition period..." Id. at 313. Thus, Virginia argued, the "mere threat of changed circumstances [was] impermissibly conjectural or hypothetical, and not the actual or imminent injury necessary to satisfy the standing requirement." Id. The Fourth Circuit rejected the state's position: "the witness residency requirement inevitably 'limits the number of voices who will convey [the] message and hours they can speak and, therefore, limits the size of the audience they can reach.' Id. at 314 (citation and footnote omitted). "It is therefore immaterial that the LPVA can, in spite of the witness residency requirement, circulate its petitions to enough of the electorate to permit the collection of 10,000 signatures, if it is also true that, absent the requirement, the petition circulators could approach and attempt to persuade an even larger audience." Id. at 315. The Supreme Court, moreover, has made clear that First Amendment rights are special: "The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury." Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). Whether a restriction 6

8 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 7 of 10 PAGEID #: 71 makes it more difficult to exercise First Amendment rights or merely delays their exercise, irreparable harm results. 8 IV. Nader v. Blackwell is Controlling. Ohio devotes most of its Response, as it must, to distinguishing Nader v. Blackwell, 545 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2008). Nader v. Blackwell, after all, invalidated Ohio's previous residency requirement for circulators of candidates' nominating petitions. None of Ohio's distinctions are persuasive. Ohio is correct to the extent that the plaintiff in Nader v. Blackwell was an independent presidential candidate. Ohio is also correct that Ohio's residency restriction in 2004 included a voter registration requirement. 9 Neither of these differences, however, factored into the Sixth Circuit's decision. That the Sixth Circuit also invalidated Ohio's registration requirement does not alter or detract from its express holding that Ohio's residence requirement separately violated the First Amendment. The Sixth Circuit, moreover, lent no significance or import to Nader's running for President (as opposed to any other office in Ohio). 8 Ohio's argument that this Court should stay these proceedings to await the Supreme Court's disposition of Virginia's petition for certiorari in Judd would only compound Plaintiffs' irreparable injury. The response to the petition for certiorari was filed just last week and the case has not yet been set for Conference. See Supreme Court of the United States, Docket Report, ( Even assuming that the Court acts quickly, no one can know whether the Supreme Court will grant it. The vast majority of petitions, of course, are denied. And if the Supreme Court grants review, the case will not likely be set for argument, let alone decided, until after the February 5, 2014 deadline. 9 It was for this reason that Ohio's residence requirement in at that time required residence for thirty days. 7

9 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 8 of 10 PAGEID #: 72 Judge Boggs' concurring opinion in Nader v. Blackwell, which was somewhat circumspect over the exact scope of the holding, was not that of the majority. The majority opinion was written by Judge Clay, who stated: Id. at 479. our decision that is unconstitutional as applied to Ralph Nader has the same practical effect as a declaration that the portions of which Nader challenges are facially unconstitutional, because any future litigant who raises a First Amendment challenge to the provisions challenged by Nader may prevail by noting that significantly compromise[s] the recognized First Amendment rights of Ralph Nader. Nothing in this Court's holding should be understood to abrogate the overbreadth doctrine. Sister Circuits have viewed Nader v. Blackwell, 545 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2008), in this same way. Indeed, Nader is cited as both properly invoking strict scrutiny and correctly invalidating Ohio's law. The Tenth Circuit, for example, in Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. Savage, 550 F.3d 1023, 1031 n.4 (10th Cir. 2008) noted that "[t]he Sixth Circuit recently addressed the constitutionality of Ohio's ban on non-resident circulators [and]... held the ban violated the First Amendment." The Fourth Circuit cited to Nader v. Blackwell as "declaring unconstitutional, as failing strict scrutiny, Ohio['s] ban on nonresidents circulating nominating petitions." Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Judd, 718 F.3d 308, 317 (4th Cir. 2013). No court has interpreted Nader v. Blackwell's reach to be limited to presidentialcandidate-challenges to residency restrictions that happen to be coupled with voter-registration requirements. The Secretary, for its part, has repeatedly rejected such a narrow interpretation. Several Directives issued by the Secretary s Office have made clear that "[t]he circulator of a candidate's petition does not have to be an Ohio resident or Ohio elector under the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Nader v. Blackwell, 545 F.3d 459 (2008)." Ohio 8

10 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 9 of 10 PAGEID #: 73 Secretary of State Directive (Jan. 31, 2013) 10 at page 2; Ohio Secretary of State Directive (Jan. 6, 2011) 11 at page 3 (same). Ohio complains that it has never been allowed an opportunity to justify its residency requirements. Ohio's Response at 5 ("facts and arguments in favor of the State on the issues of compelling state interests and narrow tailoring exist."). This is not true. It certainly had the opportunity in Nader v. Blackwell; it just did not convince the Sixth Circuit. And it had the opportunity in Moore v. Brunner, No. 2:08-cv-224 (S.D. Ohio, June 2, 2008) (2008 WL ), but failed to convince Judge Frost and Judge Sargus. Now, it has the opportunity to justify its residency requirement, but has curiously offered nothing more than vague statements about "preventing fraud" and insuring "grass-roots support." Ohio's Response at 10. Nowhere does it explain how a residency requirement furthers either aim in the context of candidates' nominating petitions. Plaintiffs can locate nothing supporting these claims in the legislative record. 12 The truth is, Nader v. Blackwell and Moore v. Brunner rejected the notion that a state needs a residency requirement to defeat fraud. So have the vast majority of courts faced with residency restrictions. See, e.g., Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Judd, 718 F.3d 308 (4th Cir S.B. 47, which was responsible for the changes to O.R.C , was first introduced on February 19, It did not then include the distinction now found in O.R.C (C)(1) between presidential candidates and all others, but simply said that "[n]o person shall be entitled to circulate any petition unless the person is at least eighteen years of age." On March 6, 2013, just before being passed, S.B. 47 was amended to include the language now found in (C)(1). Plaintiffs can locate no stated reasons for the March 6 change. 9

11 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 10 of 10 PAGEID #: ); Nader v. Brewer, 531 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2008); Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. Savage, 550 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir. 2008). Nor are non-residents anathema to democracy. A state has myriad ways to insure that laws and representatives are beholden to its people. Limiting the franchise and the right to sign petitions to residents are just two examples. Preventing non-residents from circulating nominating petitions adds nothing worthwhile. CONCLUSION Plaintiffs respectfully ask that their Motion for Preliminary Relief be GRANTED. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mark R. Brown Mark Kafantaris Mark R. Brown Ohio # Ohio # City Park Avenue 303 E. Broad Street Columbus, OH Columbus, OH (614) (614) (614) (fax) (614) (fax) mark@kafantaris.com mbrown@law.capital.edu Attorneys for Plaintiffs CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that the foregoing was filed electronically this 21st day of October, 2013, and will be sent to all parties by operation of the electronic filing system. /s/ Mark R. Brown Mark R. Brown 10

12 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK 2:08-cv EAS-TPK Doc #: Filed: 07/20/09 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 1 of 4 4 PAGEID #: #:

13 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK 2:08-cv EAS-TPK Doc #: Filed: 07/20/09 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 of 4 4 PAGEID #: #:

14 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK 2:08-cv EAS-TPK Doc #: Filed: 07/20/09 10/21/13 Page: 3 of 3 of 4 4 PAGEID #: #:

15 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK 2:08-cv EAS-TPK Doc #: Filed: 07/20/09 10/21/13 Page: 4 of 4 of 4 4 PAGEID #: #:

16 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-2 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 79

17 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-2 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 80

18 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-3 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, KEVIN KNEDLER, AARON HARRIS, CHARLIE EARL, Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:13-cv-953 v. Judge Michael H. Watson JON HUSTED, in his Official Capacity as Ohio Secretary of State, Defendant. / correct: SECOND DECLARATION OF AARON HARRIS (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746) I, Aaron Harris, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and 1. I am the named Plaintiff in the above-styled case. 2. I am above the age of 18, of sound mind, a United States citizen, a registered voter in Ohio, and reside in Fairborn, Ohio. 3. I am a member of the Libertarian Party of Ohio (LPO), sit on the LPO's State Executive Committee and also serve as the LPO Communications Director. 4. I am the LPO's State Central Committee Chair and a voter who intends to vote for LPO 1

19 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-3 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 82 candidates in Ohio's 2014 primary. 5. I am presently running for Ohio Secretary of State in the 2014 election cycle. 6. I began circulating my nominating petition in order to qualify for the 2014 Ohio primary in August of I was not aware until just a day or two before the filing of this lawsuit that the circulators of my nominating petitions are required by Ohio law to be residents of Ohio. date: 21 Oct 2013 Aaron Harris 2

20 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-4 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 83

21 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-4 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 84

22 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-5 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: 85

23 Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 15-5 Filed: 10/21/13 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: 86

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 3 Filed: 09/26/13 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al. Plaintiffs, Case

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 42 Filed: 12/23/13 Page: 1 of 19 PAGEID #: 781 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 1:08-cv SSB-TSB Document 1 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 1:08-cv SSB-TSB Document 1 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:08-cv-00391-SSB-TSB Document 1 Filed 06/06/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, KEVIN KNEDLER, BOB BARR, WAYNE A. ROOT,

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. v. No Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. v. No Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, KEVIN KNEDLER, CHARLES EARL, AARON HARRIS, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. No. 14-3230 JON HUSTED, in his Official Capacity as

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 130 Filed: 07/08/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 2883 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., and ROBERT HART, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. v. Judge Michael H. Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. v. Judge Michael H. Watson Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/08/13 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 317 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 271 Filed: 12/03/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 7318

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 271 Filed: 12/03/14 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 7318 Case 213-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc # 271 Filed 12/03/14 Page 1 of 9 PAGEID # 7318 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs, -vs-

More information

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/15/10 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 117

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/15/10 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 117 Case 110-cv-00596-SJD Doc # 9 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 12 PAGEID # 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RALPH VANZANT, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, JENNIFER BRUNNER

More information

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and TRO REQUESTED /

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and TRO REQUESTED / Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/28/18 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM SCHMITT, JR., CHAD THOMPSON, AND DEBBIE BLEWITT,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE ex rel. FOCKLER, et al., Relators, V. CASE NO. 2016-1863 HUSTED, Respondent. ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS RELATORS' MERIT BRIEF Mark R. Brown Halli Watson Bar No. 81941

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, KEVIN KNEDLER, AARON HARRIS, CHARLIE EARL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -vs- JON HUSTED, Ohio Secretary of State, Defendant-Appellee,

More information

Case 1:16-cv SJ-SMG Document 13 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 138

Case 1:16-cv SJ-SMG Document 13 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 138 Case 1:16-cv-03054-SJ-SMG Document 13 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 138 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X ALEX MERCED,

More information

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division Libertarian Party of Ohio, Plaintiff, vs. Jennifer Brunner, Case No. 2:08-cv-555 Judge Sargus Defendant. I. Introduction

More information

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL,

NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL, NO. 14-3230 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JON HUSTED, Secretary of State, Defendant-Appellee,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs, and ROBERT M. HART, Individually and ROBERT FITRAKIS, on behalf of THE GREEN

More information

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/11/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 665

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/11/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 665 Case: 2:16-cv-00212-GCS-EPD Doc #: 13 Filed: 03/11/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 665 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RANDY SMITH, as next friend of MALIK TREVON

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 99-3434 Initiative & Referendum Institute; * John Michael; Ralph Muecke; * Progressive Campaigns; Americans * for Sound Public Policy; US Term

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRIAN MOORE, STEWART ) ALEXANDER, SOCIALIST PARTY ) USA, ) DERON MIKAL, and ) SHERRY SUTER, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:18-cv-12354-VAR-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 07/27/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER GRAVELINE, WILLARD H. JOHNSON,

More information

Case: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858

Case: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 Case: 2:12-cv-00636-PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OBAMA FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143 Case: 2:15-cv-01802-MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE OHIO ORGANIZING : COLLABORATIVE,

More information

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Case 2:16-cv-00038-DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Marcus R. Mumford (12737) MUMFORD PC 405 South Main Street, Suite 975 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 428-2000 Email: mrm@mumfordpc.com

More information

SLIP OPINION NO OHIO-224 THE STATE EX REL. FOCKLER ET AL.

SLIP OPINION NO OHIO-224 THE STATE EX REL. FOCKLER ET AL. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Fockler v. Husted, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-224.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:18-cv-00980 Document 1 Filed 04/25/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MELISSA RENEE GOODALL, JEREMY WAYDE GOODALL, SHAUNA LEIGH ARRINGTON,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 165-1 Filed: 08/15/14 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 3264 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 357 Filed: 11/13/12 Page: 1 of 17 PAGEID #: 12868

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 357 Filed: 11/13/12 Page: 1 of 17 PAGEID #: 12868 Case 206-cv-00896-ALM-TPK Doc # 357 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 17 PAGEID # 12868 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, ) CASE NO.: 2586 Tiller Lane, Suite 2K ) Columbus, Ohio 43231-2265 ) ) JUDGE: Plaintiff, ) C O M P L A I N T ) (Claim of Unconstitutionality

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00042-WKW-CSC Document 64 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JILL STEIN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

More information

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 10/31/12 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 518

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 10/31/12 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 518 Case 112-cv-00797-SJD Doc # 29 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 3 PAGEID # 518 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION FAIR ELECTIONS OHIO, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, JON HUSTED,

More information

Case 5:10-cv M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Case 5:10-cv M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:10-cv-01186-M Document 7 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MUNEER AWAD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-10-1186-M ) PAUL ZIRIAX,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :0-cv-00-DGC Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 0 WO Arizona Green Party, an Arizona political party, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, Ken Bennett, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AUDREY J. SCHERING PLAINTIFF AND THE OHIO DEMOCRATIC PARTY INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFF v. J. KENNETH BLACKWELL. DEFENDANT Case No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Project Vote, et al., : : Plaintiffs : Case No. 1:08cv2266 : v. : Judge James S. Gwin : Madison County Board of :

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION The League of Women Voters, et al. Case No. 3:04CV7622 Plaintiffs v. ORDER J. Kenneth Blackwell, Defendant This is

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237 Case 213-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc # 91 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 26 PAGEID # 2237 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al, -vs- Plaintiffs, JON

More information

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of the United States No. 16-980 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JON HUSTED, Ohio

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REPUBLICAN PARTY OF OHIO : OF OHIO, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : Case No. 2:08-cv--00913 v. : : JENNIFER BRUNNER :

More information

Case 2:06-cv PMP-RJJ Document 17-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:06-cv PMP-RJJ Document 17-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 9 Case 2:06-cv-01268-PMP-RJJ Document 17-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION American Broadcasting : Companies, Inc., et

More information

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 27-1 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 27-1 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 1 of 12 Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 27-1 Filed 10/04/2005 Page 1 of 12 Anita Rios, et al., Plaintiffs, In The United States District Court For The Northern District of Ohio Western Division vs. Case No. 3:04-cv-7724

More information

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 346 Filed: 11/01/12 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 12588

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 346 Filed: 11/01/12 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 12588 Case: 2:06-cv-00896-ALM-TPK Doc #: 346 Filed: 11/01/12 Page: 1 of 11 PAGEID #: 12588 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION

More information

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/30/10 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/30/10 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 110-cv-00820-SJD Doc # 35 Filed 12/30/10 Page 1 of 10 PAGEID # 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TRACIE HUNTER, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD

More information

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/30/10 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 35 Filed: 12/30/10 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 110-cv-00820-SJD Doc # 35 Filed 12/30/10 Page 1 of 10 PAGEID # 830 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TRACIE HUNTER, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. Civil Action Number C2: JUDGE SMITH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. Civil Action Number C2: JUDGE SMITH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION PATRICIA RAY, Plaintiffs, -vs. THE FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS Civil Action Number C2:08-1086 JUDGE SMITH MAGISTRATE

More information

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 107 Filed: 01/03/11 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1672

Case: 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 107 Filed: 01/03/11 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1672 Case: 2:06-cv-00745-ALM-TPK Doc #: 107 Filed: 01/03/11 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1672 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION KING LINCOLN BROWNSVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO Appellee-Defendant, Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO Appellee-Defendant, Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO. 15-4270 JON HUSTED, in his Official Capacity as Ohio Secretary of State, and THE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. v. JUDGE WATSON MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP HUSTED, et al., Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION. v. JUDGE WATSON MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP HUSTED, et al., Defendants. Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 266 Filed: 11/16/14 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 7169 LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

More information

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 117

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 117 Case: 2:16-cv-00303-GCS-EPD Doc #: 15 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.

More information

IN THE OHIO TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. Franklin County, Ohio NO. 16APE REGULAR CALENDAR LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, Appellant, VS.

IN THE OHIO TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS. Franklin County, Ohio NO. 16APE REGULAR CALENDAR LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, Appellant, VS. IN THE OHIO TENTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS Franklin County, Ohio NO. 16APE-07-496 REGULAR CALENDAR LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, Appellant, VS. OHIO SECRETARY OF STATE, et al., Appellees. On Appeal from

More information

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383 Case: 2:16-cv-00303-GCS-EPD Doc #: 84 Filed: 10/17/16 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 23383 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, NORTHEAST

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF LOUISIANA, BOB BARR, WAYNE ROOT, SOCIALIST PARTY USA, BRIAN MOORE, STEWART ALEXANDER CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-582-JJB

More information

2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

2:09-cv GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 2:09-cv-14190-GER-PJK Doc # 58 Filed 10/18/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 1145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOHN SATAWA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-14190 Hon. Gerald

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Case No. 101 CV 556 OF OHIO FOUNDATION, INC. Plaintiff, JUDGE KATHLEEN O'MALLEY v. ROBERT ASHBROOK,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lucas County Democratic Party, et al. Case No. 3:04CV7646 Plaintiffs v. ORDER J. Kenneth Blackwell, Defendant This

More information

Case 1:16-cv SMG Document 61 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID #: 672. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv SMG Document 61 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID #: 672. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x INTRODUCTION Case 116-cv-03054-SMG Document 61 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID # 672 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Case 1:17-cv-01113 Document 2 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY; CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY; DURHAM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION JASON KESSLER, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:17CV00056

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Jon Husted et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on September 21, 2017

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Jon Husted et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on September 21, 2017 Libertarian Party of Ohio, : IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 16AP-496 v. : (C.P.C. No. 16CV-554) Jon Husted et al., : (REGULAR CALENDAR) DORRIAN, J.

More information

Case: 2:18-cv MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/06/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 24

Case: 2:18-cv MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/06/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 24 Case: 2:18-cv-01376-MHW-CMV Doc #: 2 Filed: 11/06/18 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOMMY RAY MAYS II and QUINTON NELSON

More information

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 138

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 138 Case: 2:15-cv-01802-MHW-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 138 THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE; JORDAN ISERN CAROL BIEHLE; and BRUCE BUTCHER Plaintiff(s) THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer

In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division. Answer In The United States District Court For The Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division Libertarian Party of Ohio, Plaintiffs, vs. Jennifer Brunner, Case No. 2:08-cv-555 Judge Sargus Defendant. Answer Now

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT United States of America, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, Case No. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona No. CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB

More information

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, INC.; BARRY HESS; PETER SCHMERL; JASON AUVENSHINE; ED KAHN, Plaintiffs, vs. JANICE K. BREWER, Arizona Secretary of State, Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Brian Moore, et al, : : Plaintiffs : Case No. 2:08cv224 : v. : Judge Frost : Jennifer Brunner : Ohio Secretary of

More information

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 55 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 55 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 11 Case 206-cv-00896-ALM-TPK Document 55 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS, et

More information

Case: 1:10-cv TSB Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 369 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv TSB Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 369 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case: 1:10-cv-00720-TSB Doc #: 8 Filed: 10/19/10 Page: 1 of 22 PAGEID #: 369 IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST Plaintiff v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00720

More information

Case: Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1

Case: Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 Case: 14-3877 Document: 18-1 Filed: 09/11/2014 Page: 1 Case No. 14-3877 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT OHIO STATE CONFERENCE OF : THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION : On Appeal from

More information

Case 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29

Case 1:10-cv RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 Case 1:10-cv-00135-RFC -CSO Document 1 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 29 John E. Bloomquist James E. Brown DONEY CROWLEY BLOOMQUIST PAYNE UDA P.C. 44 West 6 th Avenue, Suite 200 P.O. Box 1185 Helena, MT 59624

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII Case 1:14-cv-00102-JMS-BMK Document 19 Filed 04/21/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 392 MARR JONES & WANG A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP RICHARD M. RAND 2773-0 Pauahi Tower 1003 Bishop Street, Suite 1500

More information

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FOR RESPONDENT HARRY NISKA

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION FOR RESPONDENT HARRY NISKA No. 14-443 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States BONN CLAYTON, Petitioner, v. HARRY NISKA, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROBERT C. SARVIS, LIBERTARIAN PARTY ) OF VIRGINIA, WILLIAM HAMMER ) JEFFREY CARSON, JAMES CARR ) MARC HARROLD, WILLIAM REDPATH,

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 73 Filed: 03/16/14 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 2038

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 73 Filed: 03/16/14 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 2038 Case: 2:13-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc #: 73 Filed: 03/16/14 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 2038 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., : : Case No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE STATE OF OHIO ex rel. DANA SKAGGS, et al., v. Plaintiff - Relator, JENNIFER L. BRUNNER SECRETARY OF THE STATE

More information

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/21/10 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/21/10 Page: 1 of 16 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 110-cv-00820-SJD Doc # 1 Filed 11/21/10 Page 1 of 16 PAGEID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TRACIE HUNTER Committee to Elect Tracie M. Hunter for Judge

More information

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No Democratic National Committee, et al. Republican National Committee, et al.

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No Democratic National Committee, et al. Republican National Committee, et al. UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-4186 Democratic National Committee, et al. v. Republican National Committee, et al. Ebony Malone, Intervenor Republican National Committee, Appellant On

More information

Case: 2:10 cv EAS TPK Doc #: 28 Filed: 10/10/11 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 162

Case: 2:10 cv EAS TPK Doc #: 28 Filed: 10/10/11 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 162 Case 210 cv 01097 EAS TPK Doc # 28 Filed 10/10/11 Page 1 of 5 PAGEID # 162 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION D.D. and all other similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs,

More information

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652

Case: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652 Case 112-cv-00797-SJD Doc # 54 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 9 PAGEID # 652 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Fair Elections Ohio, et al., Plaintiffs, Jon

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :0-cv-00-SRB Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Valle del Sol, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, Michael B. Whiting, et al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CV 0-0-PHX-SRB

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No Case: 09-2227 Document: 00319762032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2009 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 09-2227 CHUCK BALDWIN, DARRELL R. CASTLE, WESLEY THOMPSON, JAMES E. PANYARD,

More information

Part Description 1 12 pages 2 Exhibit 1: Printouts from CBOE websites

Part Description 1 12 pages 2 Exhibit 1: Printouts from CBOE websites The Ohio Organizing Collaborative et al v. Husted et al, Docket No. 2:15-cv-01802 (S.D. Ohio May 08, 2015), Court Docket Part Description 1 12 pages 2 Exhibit 1: Printouts from CBOE websites Multiple Documents

More information

Case: 1:18-cv TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 213 Filed: 02/08/19 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 11403

Case: 1:18-cv TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 213 Filed: 02/08/19 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 11403 Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 213 Filed: 02/08/19 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 11403 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE,

More information

Case: 2:12-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 63 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 1 of 38 PAGEID #: 5737

Case: 2:12-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 63 Filed: 07/24/12 Page: 1 of 38 PAGEID #: 5737 Case 212-cv-00562-ALM-TPK Doc # 63 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 38 PAGEID # 5737 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BARBARA GRUTTER, vs. Plaintiff, LEE BOLLINGER, et al., Civil Action No. 97-CV-75928-DT HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN Defendants. and

More information

Case: 2:12-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/06/12 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 3550

Case: 2:12-cv ALM-TPK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/06/12 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 3550 Case: 2:12-cv-00562-ALM-TPK Doc #: 27 Filed: 07/06/12 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 3550 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO FOR THE EASTERN DIVISION SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

More information

CASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-35967, 02/12/2016, ID: 9864857, DktEntry: 27, Page 1 of 14 CASE NO. 15-35967 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAVALLI COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE, GALLATIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN

More information

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 9-1 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 9-1 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case 2:06-cv-00745-ALM-TPK Document 9-1 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KING LINCOLN BRONZEVILLE : NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION,

More information

Case: 3:17-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID #: 1

Case: 3:17-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID #: 1 Case 317-cv-01713-JJH Doc # 1 Filed 08/15/17 1 of 22. PageID # 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHARLES PFLEGHAAR, and KATINA HOLLAND -vs- Plaintiffs, CITY

More information

Case 1:09-cv REB Document 35 Filed 10/22/09 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:09-cv REB Document 35 Filed 10/22/09 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:09-cv-00022-REB Document 35 Filed 10/22/09 Page 1 of 11 LAWRENCE WASDEN ATTORNEY GENERAL BRIAN KANE, ISB #6264 Assistant Chief Deputy Attorney General STEVEN L. OLSEN, ISB #3586 Chief of Civil Litigation

More information

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/10 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/01/10 Page: 1 of 21 PAGEID #: 1 Case 110-cv-00596-SJD Doc # 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 1 of 21 PAGEID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RALPH VANZANT 6947 Mountain View Drive Hillsboro, Ohio

More information

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL,

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL, NO. 16-3537 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO; KEVIN KNEDLER; AARON HARRIS; CHARLIE EARL, v. Plaintiff-Appellants, JON HUSTED, Ohio Secretary of State,

More information

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 21 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv ALM-TPK Document 21 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Case 2:06-cv-00745-ALM-TPK Document 21 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KING LINCOLN BRONZEVILLE : Case No. C2 06 745 NEIGHBORHOOD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:15-cv-01802 v. Judge Watson Magistrate Judge King

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. 1 The Downtown Soup Kitchen v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. 1 The Downtown Soup Kitchen v. Anchorage Equal Rights Commission David A. Cortman, AZ Bar No. 029490 Kevin G. Clarkson, AK Bar No. 8511149 Jonathan A. Scruggs, AZ Bar No. 030505 Brena, Bell & Clarkson, P.C. Ryan J. Tucker, AZ Bar No. 034382 810 N Street, Suite 100 Katherine

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK LP, LLLP, CBS BROADCASTING INC., Fox

More information

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-00951-NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW (ACORN,

More information

Case: 2:18-cv EAS-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/13/18 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 129

Case: 2:18-cv EAS-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/13/18 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 129 Case: 2:18-cv-00966-EAS-EPD Doc #: 19 Filed: 09/13/18 Page: 1 of 18 PAGEID #: 129 SCHMITT, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO.2:18-cv-966

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STATE ex rel. SKAGGS, et al. v. Relators, JENNIFER L. BRUNNER SECRETARY OF STATE OF OHIO, et al., Respondents. Case

More information

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Case 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO STATE EX. REL DAVID YOST, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. C2-04-1139

More information

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 03/10/16 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 78

Case: 2:16-cv GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 03/10/16 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 78 Case: 2:16-cv-00212-GCS-EPD Doc #: 8 Filed: 03/10/16 Page: 1 of 28 PAGEID #: 78 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION } RANDY SMITH, as next friend of } MALIK

More information

Case: 2:14-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215

Case: 2:14-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215 Case: 2:14-cv-00404-PCE-NMK Doc #: 98 Filed: 11/26/14 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 6215 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OHIO STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL

More information