Minutes of the HRTPO Board meeting held on January 16, 2014 and of the February 20, 2014 Joint HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat are attached.

Transcription

1 ITEM #16: APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEMS 16A. MINUTES Minutes of the HRTPO Board meeting held on January 16, 2014 and of the February 20, 2014 Joint HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat are attached. Attachment 16-A1 Attachment 16-A2 Recommended Action: Approve the minutes. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

2 Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Board Minutes of January 16, 2014 The Hampton Roads TPO Board Meeting was called to order at 10:36 a.m. in the Regional Board Room, 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, Virginia, with the following in attendance: HRTPO Voting Members in Attendance: McKinley Price, Chair (NN) Linda T. Johnson, Vice-Chair (SU) Alan P. Krasnoff (CH) Ella Ward (Alternate, CH) John C. Meyer (GL) George Wallace (HA) Dee Dee Darden (IW) Mary Jones (JC) Paul D. Fraim (NO) Kenneth I. Wright (PO) HRTPO Nonvoting Members in Attendance: James E. Baker (CH) Randy Martin (FR) Brenda Garton (GL) Mary Bunting (HA) Anne Seward (IW) Doug Powell (JC) Jim Bourey (NN) John Rowe (PO) J. Randall Wheeler (PQ) Herbert Green (Alternate, PQ) Barry Porter (SH) William D. Sessoms (VB) Clyde Haulman (WM) Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. (YK) Emily Stock (Alternate, DRPT) William E. Harrell (HRT) James Utterback (VDOT) Jeff Florin (Alternate, VPA) Kevan Danker (WATA) Michael Johnson (SH) Selena Cuffee-Glenn (SU) Jackson C. Tuttle, II (WM) James O. McReynolds (YK)* Shepelle Watkins-White (CTAC) Ivan Rucker (FHWA) William Bell (FTAC) Capt. David Culler (USN) Capt. Robert Clark (USN) HRTPO Executive Director: Dwight L. Farmer CTB Participants: Hollis Ellis Shep Miller Other Participants: Secretary Aubrey Layne, Jr. Deputy Secretary Grindly Johnson HRTPO Voting Members Absent: Barry Cheatham (FR) W. Eugene Hunt (PQ) Senator Thomas Norment (GA)** Senator Frank Wagner (GA)** Delegate Chris Stolle (GA)** Delegate David Yancey (GA)** Rodney Oliver (VPA) HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 1 Attachment 16-A1

3 HRTPO Nonvoting Members Absent: Marcus Jones (NO) James K. Spore (VB) Jeffrey Breeden (FAA) Irene Rico (FHWA) Tony Cho (FTA) Brigid Hynes-Cherin (FTA) Col. John Allen (LANGLEY-EUSTIS) Col. Tom Wetherington (LANGLEY-EUSTIS) Wayne Shank (NAA) Ken Spirito (PAC) Capt. John Little (USCG) Randall P. Burdette (VDOA) * Late arrival or early departure ** Not in attendance due to the 2014 General Assembly Session Others Recorded Attending: John Gergely (Citizen); Brian DeProfio (HA); Michael King (NN); Rob Brown, Jeff Raliski, Ron Williams (NO); Bob Baldwin (PO); Bruce Philips (SH); Eric Nielsen (SU); Carita Richardson, Michael Stallings (Windsor); L. Frank Mach (USDOT Maritime Administration); Rhonda Murray (Naval Facilities Engineering Command); Tracy Baynard (McGuire Woods Consulting); Mark Osenbaugh (EV Williams); Ellis W. James (Sierra Club Observer); Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky (Portsmouthcitywatch.org); David Forster (Virginian-Pilot); Cathy Grimes (Daily Press); Karen McPherson (Kimley-Horn); Dennis Heuer (RK&K); Judith E. Brown (HRPTA); John Kish (CTAC); Ken Hartmann (HDR Engineering); Christie Burns (ERC); Shannon Moody (US 460 Mobility Partners); Steve Chapin (AECOM); Dan Bell (FHR); Ray Amoruso, Brian Smith (HRT); Dawn Odom, Philip Rinehart, Eric Stringfield (VDOT); Peter Huber (Willcox & Savage); Cathy Aiello (Aiello Enterprises); Camelia Ravanbakht, Sam Belfield, Rob Case, Brian Chenault, Arkopal Goswami, Kathlene Grauberger, Danetta Jankosky, Theresa Jones, Michael Kimbrel, Kendall Miller, Jessica Nappi, Keith Nichols, Joe Paulus, Dale Stith, Chris Wichman (HRTPO Staff); Rick Case, Nancy Collins, Greg Grootendorst, Jim Hummer, Whitney Katchmark, Randy Keaton, Mike Long, Kelli Peterson, Joe Turner, Chris Vaigneur, Felecia Williams (HRPDC Staff) Call to Order HRPDC Chair Kenneth Wright thanked the HRPDC members for remaining in the Board Room for the start of the HRTPO Meeting and recognized Mr. Dwight Farmer, HRPDC/HRTPO Executive Director. Mr. Farmer stated it has been his pleasure to have worked 43 years in the public sector with over 36 of those years at the HRPDC/HRTPO, including six years as Executive Director. He announced that as of July 1, 2014, he intended to retire from the HRPDC/HRTPO and distributed his resignation letter to all members. He expressed his appreciation to all Board members, especially Mayor Paul Fraim, Mayor Joe Frank, Mr. Louis Jones, and Mr. James McReynolds for his appointment as the HRPDC/HRTPO Executive Director. HRTPO Chair McKinley Price expressed his gratitude to Mr. Farmer for his many years of service to the HRPDC and HRTPO. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 2 Attachment 16-A1

4 Approval of Agenda Chair Price asked for any additions or deletions to the agenda. Mr. Farmer stated Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) requested to add a New Business item regarding the Norfolk Naval Station Transit Extension Study and the Peninsula Fixed Guideway Corridor Study. Mr. William Harrell Moved to approve the agenda with the one amendment; seconded by Mr. Jeff Florin. The Motion Carried. (Mr. McReynolds departs) Workshop Agenda Chair Price introduced Mr. John Meyer of Gloucester and Mr. Doug Powell of James City County as new members to the HRTPO Board and welcomed Ms. Grindly Johnson, Deputy Secretary of Transportation, and The Honorable Aubrey Layne, Jr., Secretary of Transportation. Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) Members Comment Period The Honorable Aubrey Layne, Secretary of Transportation, expressed best wishes from Governor McAuliffe to the HRTPO Board and thanked the Board for its support. He indicated that Governor McAuliffe has directed his Administration to properly oversee the citizens money which will determine how transportation issues are reviewed. Secretary Layne stated the General Assembly expended great political effort and capital to provide the Commonwealth with new transportation revenue and it behooves the Administration to proceed cautiously and efficiently with these funds. In addition, the citizens are required to pay additional taxes and tolls and deserve to have new projects constructed. Secretary Layne noted the Governor has requested that he work with Speaker Howell on funding efficiencies, prioritizations, and new technologies since the new funding will not be enough to cover all of the State s transportation needs. Secretary Layne commented that he plans to emphasize the State's communication and outreach efforts and introduced Ms. Grindly Johnson, Deputy Secretary of Transportation, who will be attending the monthly HRTPO Board Meetings. He stated the CTB had to decrease funding in its Six-Year Improvement Program (SYIP) by $700 million due to smaller than projected revenues from the gasoline wholesale tax. He stressed that although the State will have new transportation revenues, monies are still tight at least for the next four to five years. He indicated the real opportunity over the next four years for new construction projects will be the HB2313 regional funds. He expressed his support for bonding authority for the Hampton Roads region in order to spend these regional revenues wisely. Secretary Layne commented that the reduction of tolls on the MidtownTunnel/Downtown Tunnel/Martin Luther King (MT/DT/MLK) Extension project is a first step in trying to mitigate this impact on the area. The State will need to be in a more knowledgeable position with regards to the contract. Currently, tolling decisions are based on revenue projections and noted that was the reason the State chose tolling different rates. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 3 Attachment 16-A1

5 Secretary Layne expressed his support for the Route 460 project, but only if the proper permits can be attained. A substantial amount of funds has already been expended on this project with no additional monies currently being spent on right of way, acquisition, and construction; however, he has ordered VDOT do whatever is necessary to acquire the necessary permits to move the project forward. He stressed the need to publicly support the project because if the project is cancelled, the monies may not stay in the region. Mr. Shep Miller, CTB Member, stated the CTB approved approximately $83 million to mitigate the MT/DT/MLK tolls which totals roughly $200 million since the original agreement. He clarified the CTB was not involved in the MT/DT/MLK project agreement, but has since assisted with funding when requested. Mr. Miller introduced Mr. John Malbon as the newest Hampton Roads CTB Member and stated he is Chairman and CEO of Papco Oil in Virginia Beach. He also noted that Mr. Charles Kilpatrick and Mr. Quinton Elliot have been promoted to VDOT Commissioner and Deputy VDOT Commissioner. He reiterated Secretary Layne s comments regarding the $700 million reduction in the SYIP. He indicated the CTB received a presentation regarding problems with E-ZPass distribution and noted the State is still behind the curve in terms of convincing citizens to purchase them. Finally, Mr. Miller stated the CTB voted yesterday to unanimously provide the Eastern Shore with approximately $400,000 in rail access funds. He noted it should help with employment in Cape Charles, VA and with the overall economy on the Eastern Shore. Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Comments and Updates Ms. Emily Stock, DRPT Manager of Rail Planning, reported the Governor has appointed Ms. Jennifer Mitchell as the new DRPT Director. Formerly with Parsons Brinkerhoff in Northern Virginia, Ms. Mitchell has worked in transportation planning her entire career. DRPT recently executed an agreement with Amtrak to staff the Norfolk station and is currently reviewing consultant proposals for the Southeast High-Speed Rail Environmental Impact Statement for Richmond/Washington, D.C., which will have an effect on rail service in Hampton Roads. She indicated DRPT s new transit performance-based apportionment methodology was approved by the CTB for transit operating and capital funding and will be utilized in the near future. Virginia Department of Transportation Comments and Updates Mr. James Utterback, VDOT Hampton Roads District Administrator, reported the Eastern Federal Land Issue Notice of Intent for the I-564 Intermodal Connector was awarded to Cherry Hill Contractors and Jacobs Engineering. He stated VDOT is almost complete with the concrete patching on I-264 in Virginia Beach and the remaining Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete Overlay (THMACO) will be laid on sections of I-64 in Norfolk. He noted VDOT recently conducted a public hearing on the Military Highway Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) in Norfolk on January 6, 2014 with approximately 45 citizens in attendance. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 4 Attachment 16-A1

6 Military Liaisons Comments and Updates Captain David Culler reported that the Navy has partnered with Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) and is planning a Commanders Conference at Naval Station Norfolk specifically for all service members and civilians regarding smart transportation, vanpooling, carpooling, HRT bus service, and the potential for light rail at Naval Station Norfolk. He indicated that on February 14, 2014, he will be retiring from military service after 26 years. He introduced Captain Robert Clark who will be the new Commander for the Navy Region Mid- Atlantic and attending the HRTPO Board meetings. He stated it was his honor to have served as Commander Navy Region Mid-Atlantic and as a representative on the HRTPO Board. He expressed his gratitude for allowing the military to have a voice in regards to the region s transportation infrastructure. He stressed that the ability to effectively move its personnel to and from the area s military installations is key for mission readiness. Chair Price thanked Captain Culler for his service on the HRTPO Board. Cooperative Service Agreement: HRTPO and Christopher Newport University Ms. Kendall Miller, HRTPO Public Involvement & Title VI Administrator, reported the HRTPO plans to contract with Christopher Newport University to conduct a two-part Commuter Toll Pattern Survey in order to assess the public s familiarity with the tolls at the Midtown Tunnel/Downtown Tunnel/Martin Luther King (MT/DT/MLK) Expressway and their anticipated behavior in response to the initiation of tolls. Tolling begins at both the Midtown and Downtown Tunnels on February 1, The tolls for these tunnels will be collected using the E-ZPass system without traditional toll booths. The first part of the survey will be conducted prior to the implementation of tolls and the second part will focus on actual commuting behaviors and response once the tolls have commenced. The results of this survey will provide a baseline of commuter behavior in response to tolling in Hampton Roads. The HRTPO staff plans to publish a report entitled Analyzing and Mitigating the Impacts of tolls at the Midtown and Downtown Tunnels and will involve reviewing traffic counts and travel time data, along with videos and photos to determine how tolls are impacting the tunnels. Ms. Miller stated the HRTPO staff recommends authorization to procure the services of Christopher Newport University to conduct the two-part survey. Mr. Farmer indicated that the simultaneous research of both the CNU public survey and the HRTPO technical report was a unique opportunity for the region. Mayor Wright inquired as to the cost estimate for the CNU public survey. Ms. Miller replied the survey will be conducted in two parts, with each part costing $9,000 for a total cost of $18,000. She indicated the survey will contain a minimum of 600 participants. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 5 Attachment 16-A1

7 2034 LRTP Amendment and FY TIP Amendment: 1-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, reported that Segment 1 of the I-64 widening project encompasses Jefferson Avenue (Exit 255) to Fort Eustis Boulevard (Exit 250). She noted that VDOT has already committed $100 million to complete this segment. Currently the project is included (by segments) in the following HRTPO documents: 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP): Jefferson Avenue (Exit 255) to Fort Eustis Boulevard (Exit 250) (Segment 1) FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): Jefferson Avenue (Exit 255) to Route 199 east of Williamsburg (Exit 242) (UPC ) (Segments 1 and 2) During the January 8, 2014 HRTPO Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) meeting, VDOT put forth a proposal to modify Segment 1 of the I-64 Peninsula widening project to extend the termini: Current: From Jefferson Avenue (Exit 255) to Ft. Eustis Blvd (Exit 250) $100 million Proposed: From Jefferson Avenue (Exit 255) to Mile Marker 248 (immediately south of Exit 247) $144 million VDOT has indicated this extension would prevent temporary congestion impacts to the I- 64/Fort Eustis Boulevard interchange. The TTAC recommended approval of amending the 2034 LRTP and FY TIP to revise the limits of Segment 1 to Mile Marker 248 and that additional funds be allocated in the amount of $4 million from the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF) and $40 million from the State and FHWA subject to CTB approval. Mr. Tom Shepperd asked whether problems would arise with the transfer of the $4 million in HRTF funds to the new Authority proposed in Senate Bill 513. Dr. Ravanbakht replied that legally she was unsure; however, she believed a transfer would be possible. Mr. Farmer stated the HRTPO Board currently has the responsibility from HB2313 to allocate and commit revenues from the HRTF fund. Any action from the Board today is not an approval of expenditure; it is a programming request. He indicated there was considerable discussion after the January 2014 TTAC meeting, including VDOT staff, as to where the approximately $40 million balance would be derived. He noted it would require an action by VDOT and the CTB to allocate the $40 million and actually implement Segment 1 to Mile Marker 248. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 6 Attachment 16-A1

8 Mayor Alan Krasnoff stated the HRTPO Board could approve the entire $44 million dollars utilizing HB2313 funds allowing for the project to move forward immediately, which with a more efficient bidding process, could be more economical. He acknowledged a motion would not be in order until the Consent Agenda; however, he requested the Board to consider the opportunity. Mr. Miller inquired as to when the additional money would be needed and in what year would it be allocated. Mr. Utterback replied that in order to advise and award the contract, VDOT would have to have the money programmed within twelve months of completion of the construction which will begin in Mr. Miller asked if the funds would need to be in the SYIP by this year. Mr. Utterback replied that VDOT is committed to completing Segment 1 and stressed that VDOT suggested the termini extension as an option to help relieve temporary congestion issues at the Fort Eustis Boulevard Interchange. He stated it was his understanding that the HRTPO Board would be hard pressed to receive additional funding for the project from the CTB. He commented that VDOT is planning a public hearing and the Request for Qualification (RFQ) for a design-build in two months and by waiting for approval of additional funds to extend the termini of Segment 1, it might jeopardize its completion. Mr. Miller expressed his support for the project; however, he stated there are several other important projects for the region. He recommended the HRTPO Board have a long-term vision with regards to the HB2313 regional monies rather than piecemeal the funds for different projects. He acknowledged that it will be difficult for the CTB to allocate more money to the project; yet offered to ask on behalf of the region. Mayor George Wallace asked for clarification with regard to the different options on the table in terms of funding Segment 1 of the I-64 Peninsula widening project. Mr. Farmer explained that in May 2013, he initially suggested the HRTPO Board consider approving half of the 20% match that the State would provide through the National Highway System (NHS) monies; 10% of the project cost. In this particular case, however, he stated VDOT has taken an aggressive stance to move the project further west for a total segment cost of $144 million. Since VDOT has already committed $100 million, the other option before the Board is to commit to the $44 million utilizing HRTF funds. Mr. Shepperd inquired as to whether there were sufficient HRTF funds to commit to Segment 1. He stated it was his understanding that the HRTPO Board planned to pay for the HRTF projects in the future, rather than piecemeal. He also inquired if the State and Federal funds were in place, ready for the HRTPO to utilize them. Mr. Utterback replied that those funds are based on the formula currently used by the CTB. Any funds that would come from the interstate or primary system would not be available for several years and may even be delayed further. It was originally projected that in 2017, money would start flowing through the formula again and be allocated towards bridges, pavements, and other identified items. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 7 Attachment 16-A1

9 Mr. Shepperd questioned why the funds were not currently available. Mr. Utterback replied the $100 million committed by VDOT for Segment 1 has been allocated. Any funds above the $100 million would be determined and allocated by the CTB. Mr. Miller remarked that the priorities endorsed last year by the CTB were at the strong persuasion of the previous Secretary of Transportation. They are not mandated by law; rather, they are a guideline allowed under legislation. He noted that with the new Administration, Secretary, and VDOT Commissioner, the guidance may change; however, at the end of the day, the statewide monies are a CTB decision. Mayor Paul Fraim stated the balance of HRTF funds is currently at $31 million. Mr Farmer replied that HRTPO staff recently received an update. Mayor Fraim asked for the current balance of HRTF funds. Dr. Ravanbakht replied there is approximately $50 million in the HRTF. Mr. Farmer stated the HRTF Revenues will be discussed in further detail in Agenda Item #10. HRTPO FY 2015 Unified Planning Work Program: Planning Priorities Dr. Camelia Ravanbakht, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, reported the Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) describes regional transportation planning activities to be performed by the HRTPO, Transit Operators, VDOT, and DRPT. It details the work associated with the following HRTPO core functions: Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Congestion Management Process (CMP) Public Participation (PP) It is in the determination of these planning priorities that the HRTPO Board ensures its vision and goals are carried forward in the UPWP. Dr. Ravanbakht stated the proposed FY 2015 Planning Priorities are: Transportation Programming Efficient, User-Focused Investments Strengthening Multimodal Planning Next steps include reviewing the priorities with the HRTPO Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC), Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC), and Citizen Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) along with public review in March. Also in March, the draft UPWP will be presented with the final UPWP slated for HRTPO Board approval in April. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 8 Attachment 16-A1

10 Mr. Shepperd commented that historically, the HRTPO has served in an advisement capacity to the General Assembly on issues pertaining to transportation and suggested a planning priority be included in the UPWP that references the HRTPO s efforts to support the state legislation. The HRTPO agreed to this suggestion. Hampton Roads Transportation Fund: Monthly Financial Report Mr. Dwight Farmer, HRTPO Executive Director, stated VDOT s October 2013 HRTF Report is in the Agenda Packet and the November 2013 report is included at the table as a handout and shows a balance of approximately $46.3 million. The funds are further divided between: State Sales and Use Tax - $38.7 million Local Fuels Tax - $7.5 million Interest - $8,000 YTD Administrative Fee - $282,309 Mr. Farmer noted the administrative fee was not accrued by the HRTPO staff. Mr. Farmer stated the estimates are close to those provided by Secretary Layne with fuel consumption somewhat down from its original projection. He indicated that at a minimum, the HRTPO Board could advance the approximate 10% match ($40 million) of HRTF funds that he had originally suggested as an overall HRTPO match to the entire I-64 Peninsula widening project at the October 2013 meeting. Mayor Wallace Moved to approve the extension of the Segment 1 termini of the I-64 widening project to Mile Marker 248 and $44 million in HRTF regional funds to cover the cost. Mr. Farmer interjected that any motion must be made under the Consent Agenda. Mr. Shepperd asked whether the HRTPO would lose the opportunity to leverage for additional state money if the Board immediately committed HRTF funds. Mr. Miller replied that the annual forecast for the HRTF is roughly $180 million. The forecast for year-to-date is $59 million, and currently the actual figure is $60.2 million as of yesterday. In answering Mr. Shepperd s question, he believed that the HRTPO could still request additional funding; however, it will be harder once the Board has already allocated funds. Mr. Herbert Green stated it would be money well spent if the HRTPO allocated the $44 million to extend the Segment 1 termini because it would help alleviate the congestion that will occur with the termini ending at the Fort Eustis Boulevard interchange. Mayor Wallace commented by committing the $44 million immediately, the HRTPO will not lose any additional time in relieving the congestion on the Peninsula. Mayor Krasnoff noted that by committing the approximate 10% percent match of the entire project, the HRTPO is within protocol. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 9 Attachment 16-A1

11 Mayor Linda Johnson indicated the HRTPO has the prospect of realizing this project and should seize on the opportunity. Mr. Shepperd clarified it was not his intent to delay the project and noted it was essential to the region. He believed the cost of the project should be shared among all parties, including the CTB. Mr. Ivan Rucker inquired as to whether the SYIP or the TIP would be in jeopardy with respect to fiscal constraint if the project was started in 2015 and funds were not available. He asked for assurances that the $40 million had already been committed by the State. He also inquired as to the cost breakdown of preliminary engineering, right of way, and construction. Mr. Farmer replied the $40 million had not been committed by the State and was the topic of the current discussion. Mr. Utterback stated the right of way cost was in the $20 million range, $10 million for preliminary engineering, and the rest for construction for Segment 1. Mr. Rucker reminded the Board members that a project could not be added to the TIP if federal funds had not yet been made available. Mayor Wallace asked why the HRTF figures were less than forecasted. Mr. Farmer replied it was probably two-fold in that there is a delay in getting the DMV report and that sales/consumption is relatively flat at the moment. Mayor Wallace inquired whether the administrative fee applied to the HRTPO. Chair Price stated he had similar concerns because the fee is high. Mr. Farmer commented that VDOT included a set-up charge and the fee should be decreasing. He indicated that if the Board was not satisfied with the fee in a few months, he would initiate a letter to VDOT from the HRTPO Chair for an official response. Hampton Roads Transportation Fund: Creation of Authority Mr. Peter Huber, Attorney at Law, reported that HB2313 established the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund with the State holding the funds. Currently, there is no such authority to allow those funds to be used to support bonds or authorize bonds to be issued for the authorized projects. HB2313 established similar new revenue sources in Northern Virginia but with the majority of those funds distributed directly to the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA). The NVTA has both the statutory power to issue bonds and undertake transportation projects, unlike the HRTPO. The HRTPO has endorsed legislation in its 2014 Legislative Agenda that would allow the revenues to be used to support bonds and on several occasions the HRTPO Board has discussed the possibility of creating a transportation financing authority in the region. The Authority would receive the funds, expend them for the approved projects, and be able to HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 10 Attachment 16-A1

12 issue the bonds. When HB2313 was enacted, one of the enactment clauses directed the State to undertake a study of how the revenue collection and usage has played out both here and in Northern Virginia. That study was issued by VDOT in early December with the following key recommendations that apply to this region: Establish the composition of the entity, which for purposes of locality representation, should only include those localities located in Planning District 23 Direct that Chapter 766 revenues generated in Planning District 23 localities and deposited in the HRTF be distributed to the entity/authority Authorize expenditure of the funds in the HRTF by the entity/authority in accord with statutory requirements Authorize the entity/authority to issue bonds and other evidences of debt and authorize use of Chapter 766 revenues to support such debt Provide for recoupment or allocation of administrative expenses of the entity/authority Mr. Huber stated that in early January, Senator Frank Wagner pre-filed Senate Bill 513 which provides for the creation of the Hampton Roads Transportation Authority. It is fundamentally based on and follows the model of the NVTA; however it is important to know that HRTPO staff understands that the bill is only a place holder and Senator Wagner is open to discussing modifications to the legislation going forward. Mr. Huber highlighted several points of SB513: Under SB513, the HRTF and HB2313 revenues would continue to be held by the State. It would shift responsibilities and obligations for transportation planning and approval in the region to the new authority which would create conflicts with HRTPO functions regarding federal programming requirements. Mass transit is included in SB513, whereas the HB2313 revenues are currently not applicable to mass transit projects. The new Authority s Board composition models that of Northern Virginia and would be different than that of the HRTPO. It does not allow for the recoupment of administrative costs for staffing support, but rather allocates them to the member localities. It reflects the Northern Virginia model with a 30% 70% regional split in the distribution of revenues and has a number of powers, including the power to impose tolls and charges and implement projects. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 11 Attachment 16-A1

13 Mr. Michael Johnson asked how SB513 might affect the Memoranda of Agreements (MOAs) that are between the HRTPO and the City of Franklin and Southampton County. Mr. Huber replied he was unsure as SB513 does not specifically address it; however, he believed it would have an impact. Mayor Krasnoff commented the City of Chesapeake Attorney reviewed SB513 and noted the legislation seeks to penalize localities that have not adopted additional real estate tax on commercial and industrial properties. Mayor Krasnoff stated localities who did not comply will have money taken from its 70% share. Mr. Huber replied Mayor Krasnoff was correct. Mayor Krasnoff expressed appreciation in that SB513 was utilized as a placeholder to open dialogue with regards to the HB2313 revenues; however, he indicated the localities will be potentially penalized in many regards. Mayor William Sessoms stated he recently talked with Senator Wagner and he assured him that he wants to hear from the HRTPO Board on how to draft the bill. Mayor Wallace inquired as to what language the HRTPO Board would provide to Senator Wagner. Mayor Sessoms suggested the HRTPO Legislative Ad-hoc Committee convene and recommend language for SB513. Chair Price stated that per the HRTPO Board, the Legislative Ad-hoc Committee will convene as soon as possible to discuss language changes to SB513. Mayor Krasnoff indicated there would also be other bills introduced into the General Assembly regarding the HB2313 revenues. Mayor Fraim inquired as to the composition of the Legislative Ad-hoc Committee. Mr. Farmer replied it is composed of two General Assembly members, two local elected officials, and two local legislative liaisons. Mayor Fraim noted that on several occasions non-elected officials have made motions on the Legislative Ad-hoc Committee and asked the Board be notified of the meeting date and time in order to participate. Mr. Farmer replied affirmatively. Mayor Wright inquired as to the additional bills that might be submitted to the General Assembly. Mayor Krasnoff replied it was his understanding that there would potentially be other bills introduced. Mr. Shepperd commented that the other bills might not address the content of SB513 and noted there even was a bill introduced that is recommending the elimination of the transportation funding altogether. Mr. Shepperd asked for clarification regarding the 30% 70% revenue distribution. Mayor Sessoms replied he received direction from Senator Wagner and other local legislators that they were supporting the region s mega projects and that the revenue distribution would not occur in Hampton Roads. Mr. Miller agreed with Mayor Sessoms comments. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 12 Attachment 16-A1

14 Mr. Shepperd indicated that since the General Assembly is currently in session, it will be difficult to communicate directly with the legislators. Mr. Miller agreed. Chair Price stated the Legislative Ad-hoc Committee would convene as soon as possible. Public Comment Period Meeting Agenda Three people requested to address the HRTPO Board. Chair Price asked them to limit their comments to three minutes. Ms. Rita Richardson Distinguished ladies and gentlemen, thank you for listening to me this morning. I'll be brief. I am the Mayor of the Town of Windsor which is on Route 460 and I have a bit of a cold so excuse my voice. We are here this morning to tell you that we fully support your transportation plan for the region in totality. That means we are in full support of the proposed new Route 460, of widening I-64, of building the Third Crossing, of the light rail, and doing this all in an environmentally friendly manner. I think it's critical for our region that we do all of this because together they address major concerns. One is congestion. If the new Route 460 is canceled, we have one limited access highway which is I-64 on the Peninsula. With the new Route 460, which will be mainly paid for with tolls which we also support, it will take a lot of the heavy truck traffic off I-64 from the ports. It will also take a lot of the people going to the beaches, Virginia Beach, the Outer Banks, and many other people, and they will pay the tolls that are proposed to go travel through less congested areas, which is what it will be, and to get there more quickly and efficiently. So if you just do in and out limited highway on I-64 for the future, think about what's going to happen. We just did the Monitor Merrimac Bridge a major project; it dumps traffic and I don't use the word dump basically in a negative way, but it dumps traffic on the Peninsula on I-64. We're proposing the Third Crossing, which I support; we need it for commuters who work, but we don't need it to just dump everybody going in and out of Hampton Roads onto I-64. We cannot put in enough lanes on I-64 in the future to really help the congestion, but with two limited access highways we can. The second thing that nobody is talking about in the media is the safety of hurricane evacuation for all of Hampton Roads. We have over 1.7 million people in this area and that's not counting the people in the Outer Banks that evacuate through here for hurricanes. There is no way that you're going to get them all out on I-64. And you have to have a limited access highway to do that safely because you have to have a highway that police and emergency services can control, and people can't just be coming in at all points. That's totally going to cause accidents; it's going to cause major panic and chaos, police can't get to them, and it's going to be a massive parking lot. So I urge you to please think about hurricane evacuation. Our Sandy may come, and your decisions about this are critical because right now we would have a massive death toll and panic and it would be horrible for our entire region, and I want to say, Aubrey Layne, if I just understood him correctly, just said that if we start doing away with 460 or other projects, it doesn't mean this money goes down here to reduce tolls or pay for something else; we may lose it. United we stand, divided we fail. So thank you. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 13 Attachment 16-A1

15 Mr. Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky Good afternoon, Mr. Chair, Honorable Board members and fellow citizens. I hope that everybody has not concluded that with the Governor's announcement on Wednesday that peace is at hand, the struggle is over. I know there is tunnel toll fatigue to overcome, but there's so many aspects of the ERC deal that are only just emerging, including one that was new to me and I've been following this from the get-go. The fact that Hampton Roads Transit vehicles are not exempt from tolling is astonishing, and the fact that local emergency responders in the course of their duties, their vehicles are not exempt from tolling; that's outrageous. I don't know how many of you know about Schedule J. It's not something that's been widely reported in the press, but it exists. If you go to the DRIVEERT website you will find it. It takes some work, but that adds several cents to the base toll for the first ten years after the second tunnel is substantially complete. It also factors into the 3.5% or CPI inflation adjustment at the base. So I'm not sure that the projections of the ultimate toll at the end of 70 years are correct because I'm not sure people are taking that into their calculations. At any rate, I think that we need to urge the Governor to do a wholesale evaluation of the contract and look at ways to revisit some of the most egregious parts of it, and your role in this crucial. Thank you very much. Mr. Ellis W. James Thank you Mr. Chairman. My name is Ellis W. James. I'm a lifelong resident of the City of Norfolk. I'm also a proud member of the Sierra Club as well as the NEC in Norfolk and I'm an observer for both of those groups on situations such as we have heard this morning. Tolls - I have been opposed to and I have spoken before you once before on that issue and I think we're now beginning to see how serious this issue is. The contract has many flaws in it but I'm not here to try to argue against that, but I think we need to pay close attention. I caught this morning Secretary Layne s reference to Virginia is at a minimum on the fuel tax. That could spell some real trouble for Hampton Roads in my opinion and I think we had a perfect example this morning during the discussion - both from the members of the HRTPO as well as our fine Director, Dwight Farmer. Dwight Farmer sat there and pulled together a number of things during the discussion. I'm sorry, Dwight, I'm for renegotiation. I understand the situation, but we're going to lose that wealth of knowledge and ability to lead and so I hope something very significant is being planned for being sure that we can replace Dwight with a knowledgeable and effective leader. To end this, I have caught in the last few days references to light rail. I, as a citizen who loves Virginia Beach and have spent my entire life at the Oceanfront, would like to suggest that the Hilltop alternative is causing quite a bit of opposition and concern. The potential congestion and damage or interference to the businesses in the Hilltop area potentially is significant in my humble opinion, and I would hope that we are very careful about abandoning the key issue, and that is to get the core extension of light rail through Norfolk to NAS, as well as to the Oceanfront, without doing a horrendous negative impact situation to our businesses and economy. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Submitted Public Comments Chair Price reported there was one submitted public comment as a handout. Approval of Consent Items Minutes HRTPO Financial Statements Budget Amendment: Personnel HRTPO CMAQ/RSTP Project Selection Process Guide Revisions HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 14 Attachment 16-A1

16 Allocation of Available CMAQ and RSTP Funds Through FY 2020 FY TIP Revision: CMAQ and RSTP Fund Transfer Request Gloucester County FY TIP Revision: CMAQ and RSTP Fund Transfer Request James City County FY TIP Amendment: VDOT FY TIP Amendment: VDOT FY TIP Amendment: VDOT FY TIP Amendment: VDOT FY TIP Amendment: VDOT Procedures for Closures at River Crossings Cooperative Service Agreement: HRTPO and Christopher Newport University Memorandum of Understanding Between the HRPDC and HRTPO Regarding the Composition of the Personnel and Budget Committee HRPDC Personnel Manual Update 2034 LRTP Amendment and FY TIP Amendment: I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 Mayor Wallace Moved to remove Agenda Item 14Q 2034 LRTP Amendment and FY TIP Amendment: I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1 from the Consent Agenda for a separate vote; seconded by Mayor Wright. The Motion Carried. Mr. Harrell Moved to approve the Consent Agenda with the removal of Agenda Item 14Q 2034 LRTP Amendment and FY TIP Amendment: I-64 Peninsula Widening Segment 1; seconded by Mr. Shepperd. The Motion Carried LRTP Amendment and FY TIP Amendment: I-64 Peninsula Widening Mayor Wallace Moved to approve the extension of the Segment 1 termini of the I-64 widening project to Mile Marker 248 and $44 million in HRTF regional funds to cover the cost; seconded by Mr. Green. Mr. Harrell expressed his total support for the project, yet cautioned that the TTAC had recommended the allocation of only $4 million in HRTF regional funds while seeking the additional $40 million from the CTB. He noted that based on the provided schedule, the funding will not be needed until the spring/summer and asked the Board to consider this alternative. Mr. Shepperd asked Mayor Wallace if he would consider adding language to his motion to seek the $40 million from the CTB prior to the Board s approval of the additional funds. Mayor Wallace replied it was his understanding that from the earlier discussion, the Board planned to utilize the entire $44 million from the HRTF funds; however, he was open to the idea of requesting the $40 million from the CTB if it would not delay the project. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 15 Attachment 16-A1

17 Mayor Sessoms asked whether the HRTPO Board would seek funds from the CTB before or after the Board approved an allocation of the entire $44 million in HRTF funds. Mayor Wallace replied it was his understanding that the Board would ask for additional CTB funding after the HRTPO Board voted to approve the entire $44 million. Mr. Miller inquired as to VDOT s financial deadline in order to extend Segment 1 in the current schedule. Mr. Utterback replied VDOT would need a financial commitment by today if the scheduled public hearings are to be on time. Otherwise, the project would be delayed. Mr. Miller stated that he and Mr. Hollis Ellis would be willing to ask for an additional $5 or $6 million from the CTB for the project; however, it would be almost impossible to receive the entire $44 million to extend the Segment 1 termini. Mr. Green inquired as to when the additional two miles past the Fort Eustis Boulevard interchange would be completed if they were not included in Segment 1. Mr. Utterback replied the two miles would then be contained within Segment 2 and currently, there are no funds committed to this segment. Mr. Miller asked whether VDOT could have the option to extend Segment 1 at its discretion. Mr. Utterback replied it would interfere with the public process. Mr. Miller inquired if VDOT could build the option into the public process and the RFQ procedure. Mr. Utterback replied that he could try; however, funding would have to be identified at that time. Mr. Shepperd asked whether construction was slated to begin in 2017 as originally planned or had the date been moved forward. Mr. Utterback replied construction would begin in Mr. Shepperd stated it was his understanding that Mr. Miller and Mr. Ellis would seek additional funding from the CTB for the project, but at a minimum, the $44 million would come from the HRTF regional funds in order to move Segment 1 forward and asked for clarification. Mr. Utterback replied affirmatively. Mayor Wallace indicated the HRTPO has close to $60 million in HRTF regional funds generated in only approximately four months and recommended utilizing these funds to extend the Segment 1 termini past the busy Fort Eustis Boulevard interchange. Mr. James Baker commented that the HRTPO could view the $44 million as a down payment toward its local match for the entire project. He noted it might not provide any leverage at the present time; yet it could in the future segments. Chair Price agreed with Mr. Baker s comments. Mr. Shepperd questioned if VDOT would need the money designated towards Segment 1. Mr. Baker replied affirmatively, but he stated the HRTPO would consider it as applying towards the local match of the entire project. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 16 Attachment 16-A1

18 Mayor Krasnoff asked if Mr. Baker s suggestion should be included in the motion. Mr. Farmer replied that he would speak with Mr. Baker after the meeting and communicate the message in a letter to Mr. Utterback via the normal TIP amendment protocol. Regarding the motion on the floor; The Motion Carried General Assembly Session: Status Report Chair Price stated the General Assembly Session Status Report was included in the Agenda Packet for the Board s review. HRTPO Draft Reports for Public Review Chair Price highlighted the HRTPO draft reports under review in the Agenda Packet. HRTPO Board Three-Month Tentative Schedule Chair Price outlined the HRTPO Board three-month tentative schedule in the Agenda Packet. Correspondence of Interest Chair Price referenced the items in the Correspondence of Interest section of the Agenda packet. For Your Information Chair Price noted the items in the For Your Information section of the Agenda packet. Old/New Business Mr. William Harrell, President and CEO of Hampton Roads Transit (HRT), reported that HRT is conducting two key studies which are important for the economic vitality of the region. The first study involves the Environmental Impact Review for the Norfolk Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. He indicated that the U.S. Navy s Captain Culler was supportive of the study as it relates to its military assets and readiness. In addition, HRT is seeking funding for the Peninsula Fixed Guideway Corridor Study and has received endorsement from both the Peninsula and Southside Chambers He noted the Norfolk Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study is sponsored by Senator Frank Wagner and Delegate Ron Villanueva and Senator Tom Norment and Delegate Monty Mason are supporting the Peninsula project. He asked for HRTPO approval of the enclosed support letter to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee of the General Assembly. Mayor Sessoms Moved to approve the HRT support letter to the Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee of the General Assembly, seconded by Mayor Fraim. The Motion Carried. HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 17 Attachment 16-A1

19 Adjournment With no further business to come before the Hampton Roads TPO, the meeting adjourned at 1:00 p.m. McKinley Price Chair Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary HRTPO Board Minutes January 16, 2014 Page 18 Attachment 16-A1

20 Hampton Roads Planning District Commission and the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Joint Retreat Minutes of February 20, 2014 The Joint Retreat of the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC) and the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) was called to order at 10:35 a.m. in the Regional Board Room, 723 Woodlake Drive, Chesapeake, Virginia, with the following in attendance: HRPDC/HRTPO Members in Attendance: Kenneth I. Wright, HRPDC Chair (PO) McKinley Price, HRTPO Chair (NN) James E. Baker (CH) Amar Dwarkanath (CH) Alan P. Krasnoff (CH) Ella Ward (CH) Barry Cheatham (FR) Randy Martin (FR) John Meyer (GL) Mary Bunting (HA) Dee Dee Darden (IW) Mary Jones (JC) Jim Bourey (NN) Sharon Scott (NN)* Paul D. Fraim (NO) Marcus Jones (NO)* John Rowe (PO) Barry Porter (SH) Charles Brown (SU) Selena Cuffee-Glenn (SU) HRPDC/HRTPO Members Absent: Scott Matheson (CH) Debbie Ritter (CH) Brenda Garton (GL) Will J. Moffett (HA) George Wallace (HA) Anne Seward (IW) Doug Powell (JC) Thomas Smigiel (NO) Angelia Williams (NO) W. Eugene Hunt (PQ) J. Randall Wheeler (PQ) Michael Johnson (SH) John Moss (VB) John Uhrin (VB) James O. McReynolds (YK) Jeffrey Breeden (FAA) Linda T. Johnson (SU) Tyrone Franklin (SY) John Seward (SY) Robert Dyer (VB)* Barbara Henley (VB) Louis Jones (VB) Amelia Ross-Hammond (VB) William D. Sessoms (VB) James Spore (VB) Clyde Haulman (WM) Jackson C. Tuttle, II (WM) Thomas G. Shepperd, Jr. (YK) Shepelle Watkins-White (CTAC) Jennifer Mitchell (DRPT) Ivan Rucker (FHWA) William E. Harrell (HRT) Colonel Jayne Jansen (Langley-Eustis) James Utterback (VDOT) Jeff Florin (VPA) Kevan Danker (WATA) Irene Rico (FHWA) Tony Cho (FTA) Brigid Hynes-Cherin (FTA) William Bell (FTAC) Senator Thomas Norment (GA)** Senator Frank Wagner (GA)** Delegate Chris Stolle (GA)** Delegate David Yancey (GA)** Col. John Allen (Langley-Eustis) Col. William Galbraith (Langley-Eustis) Wayne Shank (NAA) Ken Spirito (PAC) Capt. Robert Clark (USN) Capt. John Little (USCG) Randall P. Burdette (VDOA) Rodney Oliver (VPA) HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 1 Attachment 16-A2

21 HRTPO Executive Director: Dwight L. Farmer CTB Participants: Hollis Ellis John Malbon Shep Miller Other Participants: Secretary Aubrey Layne, Jr. David White (FTAC) Jamie Oliver (IW) Allen Murphy (JC) Bruce Phillips (SH) Peter Huber (Willcox & Savage) * Late arrival or early departure ** Not in attendance due to the 2014 General Assembly Session Others Recorded Attending: Cliff Dunn, Jonathan Nye (Citizens); Mark Osenbaugh, Earl Sorey (CH); Brian DeProfio (HA); Michael King (NN); Jeff Raliski, Ron Williams (NO); Bob Baldwin (PO); Sherry Hunt (SU); Bob Matthias, Brian Solis (VB); Rhonda Murray (Navy Region Mid-Atlantic); Tracy Baynard (McGuire Woods Consulting); Bruce McIntosh (EV Williams); Ellis W. James (Sierra Club Observer); Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky (Portsmouthcitywatch.org); David Forster (Virginian- Pilot); Cathy Grimes (Daily Press); Karen McPherson (McPherson Consulting); Terry Danaher (CTAC); Shannon Moody (US 460 Mobility Partners); Megan O Reilly (Commonwealth Connector); Diane Kaufman (Senator Kaine s Office); John Hendrickson, Scott Lovell (Parsons Brinckerhoff); Will Christopher (HRPTA); Craig Quigley (HRMFFA); Dan Bell, Robby Gayer (FHR); Ray Amoruso, Brian Smith (HRT); Marshall Herman, Dawn Odom, Eric Stringfield (VDOT); Cathy Aiello (Aiello Enterprises); Camelia Ravanbakht, Sam Belfield, Rob Case, Brian Chenault, Arkopal Goswami, Kathlene Grauberger, Danetta Jankosky, Theresa Jones, Michael Kimbrel, Brian Miller, Kendall Miller, Jessica Nappi, Joe Paulus, Dale Stith, Chris Wichman (HRTPO Staff); Shernita Bethea, Curtis Brown, Rick Case, Jennifer Coleman, Nancy Collins, Rebekah Eastep, Greg Grootendorst, Julia Hillegass, Jim Hummer, Whitney Katchmark, Randy Keaton, Sara Kidd, Mike Long, Jai McBride, Kelli Peterson, Jenny Tribo, Chris Vaigneur, Tara Walker (HRPDC Staff) Public Comment Period One person requested to address the HRPDC and the HRTPO Boards. HRTPO Chair Price asked him to limit his comments to three minutes. Mr. Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky Okay. I hope I don't anticipate you, sir. I'm Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky from Portsmouth and Hampton Roads. I have been lobbying in Richmond against two bills that I think are not ready for prime time. They're House Bill 1253 and Senate Bill 513. I have passed out or thanks to the good staff here, I've passed out copies of my principal objections to those bills. I want to cite the fact that these concepts, the structural framework for these bills has never been vetted in the region, the public has had no input, and a number of people who have become aware of the bills in addition to myself have grave concerns about them. There are petitions circulating. They have been distributed to the members of the General Assembly, and I personally have been there on two occasions to pass out letters similar to these to them expressing my HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 2 Attachment 16-A2

22 concerns. Now, I know the TPO is interested in having bonding authority to leverage the funds that we're receiving under last year's transportation bill, and I don't object to that per se. I recognize that it's a well-established practice; the Commonwealth does it ever since Harry Byrd's regime was dissolved, but there are other issues in the bill, and let me say this about bonding. In the event of a default by the Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission, who is going to be on the hook for it? If we follow the SPSA model that would mean all the constituent localities would be on the hook for the outstanding debt. The bill, the bills do not address that particular point and I think it should be a matter of concern to all of us. The other problem I have is the Governments. The proposal is that the Mayors and Chairs and some select members of the General Assembly would be the voting members of the Governing Board for the Accountability Commission. Well, that's well and good but that means there's only one member who is actually accountable to me, that's my Mayor. If I want to fire Mayor Krasnoff or Mayor Sessoms from the Board, that's not an option. To me, and I just choose them as, you know, visible examples. To me, a better model would be what Virginia Beach uses for its bureau representatives whereby there would be somebody from each geographic location, but elected by the region as a whole, but I'm not here to improve the bill, I'm here to ask you to haul it in, review it, and put something else in after the public has had input to the process. Thank you. (Ms. Sharon Scott arrives) Submitted Public Comments Chair Price reported there were no submitted public comments. Approval of Agenda Chair Price asked for any additions or deletions to the agenda. Mayor Wright Moved to approve the agenda as written; seconded by Mr. Barry Cheatham. The Motion Carried. Legislative Briefing Retreat Agenda The Honorable Aubrey Layne, Secretary of Transportation, thanked the HRPDC and the HRTPO Boards for inviting him to present a legislative update at its Retreat. He planned to discuss House Bill (HB) 2, currently in the General Assembly and the proposed Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission (HRTAC). He indicated that under HB2, statewide monies from the Six-Year Improvement Program (SYIP) would stay at the HRTPO level and the HB2313 regional monies would funnel into the proposed HRTAC. Secretary Layne outlined HB2 as follows: Directs the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) to develop a statewide prioritization process for construction funds Would start with the FY Six-Year Improvement Program (SYIP) Projects fully funded as of June 30, 2014 and that have completed the environmental review may be exempt from the process HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 3 Attachment 16-A2

23 Requires the CTB to use the following facts in the evaluation of projects: o Congestion Mitigation o Economic Development o Accessibility o Safety o Environmental Quality Factors will be weighted differently in various districts Does not apply to the following state funds: o Bridge replacement/rehabilitation o Revenue Sharing Program o Federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Transportation Alternatives (TA) Program o State secondary and urban formula funds Does not apply to regional funds in Northern Virginia, Hampton Roads or federal Surface Transportation Funds (STP) funds controlled by the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). (Mr. Marcus Jones arrives) Secretary Layne stated the CTB is collaborating with Speaker Bill Howell with regards to the Statewide Prioritization Process. He noted the CTB will review the HRTPO Prioritization Process along with other procedures utilized by Northern Virginia, other regions around the Commonwealth, and other states in order to create a prioritization process that will meet the needs of all regions. Secretary Layne noted there are no additional statewide monies from HB2313 and the CTB recently reduced its previous projections by $700 million because of lower gasoline prices at both the wholesale and retail levels. He indicated that unless economic activity or gasoline prices increase substantially, the SYIP will remain flat for the foreseeable future. (Mr. Robert Dyer arrives) The five factors the CTB will use in order to determine prioritization will receive different weighting in different regions. Whereas congestion mitigation will receive a higher weight in urban areas, economic development will more than likely receive a higher weight in rural areas. He noted that the SYIP, after accounting for the project and program exclusions, will contain approximately $600 million a year in the outer years. Much of the SYIP today is money used for rehabilitation with no new construction projects. Along with public hearings in each district of the Commonwealth, there will be changes to the VDOT planning process. Secretary Layne stated his intent to bring greater transparency to VDOT and the CTB will have greater input into the actual planning of the SYIP. HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 4 Attachment 16-A2

24 Secretary Layne reported the purpose behind the proposed Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission (HRTAC) is two-fold: to separate the HB2313 regional monies and to ensure that these funds will be utilized for regionally specific projects that would otherwise not be completed with statewide funds. He summarized the proposed HRTAC as follows: Set forth from HB1253 (Patroned by Delegate S. Chris Jones) and SB513 (Patroned by Senator Frank Wagner and Senator L. Louise Lucas) Establishes the Accountability Commission for the Hampton Roads region o Will serve as a financing arm for the Hampton Roads Regional Fund (HRTF) o Provides policy oversight for key regional projects advanced with regional funds VDOT would continue to oversee construction of projects HRTAC Board would consist of members o Chief Executive of the 14 member local governments o 3-4 members of the General Assembly o 4 ex officio members CTB members from the area, DRPT Director, Commissioner of Highways, VPA Director Affirmative decisions require two-thirds vote of members representing at least twothirds of the regional population Powers of the HRTAC include: o Issuing bonds backed by regional revenues o Setting toll rates for toll projects advanced using regional revenues o Negotiating public private partnerships as the responsible public entity Secretary Layne stated it was important to know that the HRTAC does not have the ability to raise taxes; however, it does have the ability to toll since the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a toll is not a tax. He indicated the HRTAC is only for accounting purposes for the HB2313 regional monies, along with any TIGER or other grant funds. It will hold these funds in an account and the HRTPO will determine which projects will be allocated funds. All administrative costs would be borne by the HRTAC and any possible project default will be HRTAC s responsibility rather than any locality. It is modeled from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA); however, it will have more authority. He acknowledged HRTAC s proposed voting system has been questioned and indicated that any changes would have to come directly from Delegate Chris Jones. Due to the lack of transparency regarding the Midtown Tunnel/Downtown Tunnel/Martin Luther King (MT/DT/MLK) Extension public-private partnership (P3) project, HB1253/SB513 delegates any future P3 decisions in the hands of the local elected officials through the HRTAC. Secretary Layne indicated that for the past six months he has been working with VDOT on every major project in Hampton Roads developing a model using the HB2313 regional monies. Each major project in Hampton Roads would be input into the model and of those major projects, any water crossing project would be tolled. Using this assumption, he believed every mega project in Hampton Roads could be constructed in the next HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 5 Attachment 16-A2

25 years. He noted he will present the model to the HRTPO Board in the future and the Board can decide whether to utilize it. Mayor Wright inquired as to the current status of HB1253/SB1253. Secretary Layne replied the bill was passed in both the House and Senate; however, it is going into conference and some changes will be made. He indicated his office is in contact with Senator Wagner and they are working on the detailed language regarding the administrative work to ensure there is no duplication of effort between the HRTAC and the HRTPO. Mr. Tom Shepperd asked if HB1253/SB513 would allow for the use of HB2313 regional monies in the establishment of HRTAC along with personnel costs. Secretary Layne replied affirmatively. Mr. Shep Miller expressed his support for HB1253/SB513 and commented that most of the costs involved will already be borne by the HRTPO and could possibly be staffed by HRTPO staff. Secretary Layne stated it would depend on the degree of bonding activity by the HRTAC. Mayor Linda Johnson stated HB1253/SB513 originally called for the localities to bear the administrative cost and asked for clarification. Secretary Layne replied the intent is for the monies to be borne by the HB2313 revenues. Mayor Johnson asked whether the bill still contained specific language regarding voting procedure with respect to the two-thirds vote. Secretary replied affirmatively and indicated the intention was that one person could not ideologically stop a project. Mayor Johnson inquired as to whether alternates could be utilized on the HRTAC if the appointed elected official was sick or injured. Secretary Layne replied it would be an administrative item that could be reviewed. Mr. Ivan Rucker asked for clarification regarding the additional tiered voting structure in HB1253/SB513. Secretary Layne replied that criteria would not apply in Hampton Roads. Ms. Amelia Ross-Hammond inquired as to why a toll was not considered a tax. Secretary Layne replied the latest Supreme Court ruling of Virginia declared a toll was not a tax. The CTB, VDOT, and the General Assembly have the power to toll and could delegate that power to a third party for a P3 project. He reiterated the HRTAC will not have the ability to tax. Mayor William Sessoms expressed his appreciation for Secretary Layne s efforts and stated the HRPDC and HRTPO were honored to have the Secretary hale from Hampton Roads. Secretary Layne thanked the members and stated the Governor plans for Hampton Roads to become the economic engine of the Commonwealth. Mayor Alan Krasnoff echoed Mayor Sessoms comments and also commended Mr. Jim Utterback of VDOT for his efforts during the snowstorm last week. Mr. Layne also thanked Mr. Utterback and noted the Governor s intent to provide the best for the State. HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 6 Attachment 16-A2

26 Secretary Layne introduced Ms. Jennifer Mitchell as the new Virginia Director of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) and indicated she is extremely knowledgeable in both the private and public sectors. Chair Price expressed his gratitude to Secretary Layne for taking the time to speak to the HRPDC and the HRTPO. Mr. Farmer reported that since Secretary Layne was able to provide a legislative update, it was not necessary for him to speak on the subject. He did, however, inform the HRPDC and the HRTPO that staff is currently working on the 2040 Fiscally Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). He noted the draft revenue estimates for the 2040 LRTP, which are derived from FY 2014 FY 2040, are estimated to be over $25 billion. This includes $5.5 billion in HB2313 regional monies, $2.5 billion of HB2313 statewide monies, maintenance funds, as well as traditional state and federal funds. Mayor Paul Fraim asked how the $25 billion was determined. Mr. Farmer stated HRTPO staff will craft a chart for the March meeting. Mayor Krasnoff asked if the chart could be drafted for today s retreat. Mr. Farmer replied affirmatively. Mr. Shepperd asked whether the region s percentage was still at 19% for state monies. Mr. Farmer replied affirmatively. Mr. Hollis Ellis inquired as to the total amount of HB2313 regional monies. Mr. Farmer replied the Hampton Roads Transportation Fund (HRTF) total is $8.4 billion which includes both the regional and statewide funds. After more discussion Mr. Farmer displayed a slide which showed the various components of the $25 billion of revenues for FY 2014 FY HRPDC/HRTPO Organization Structure: Succession Planning Mr. Dwight Farmer, HRPDC/HRTPO Executive Director, reported that at the request of the HRPDC and HRTPO Chairs, he prepared background information and options for the succession planning after his retirement in July He indicated his preference to step aside and defer to the HRPDC and the HRTPO once his presentation was complete. He stated prior to 2008, the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC) was the umbrella organization with the HRPDC ratifying any decisions approved by the Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Organization (HRMPO). Shortly after his promotion to Executive Director, the HRMPO was required to reform itself as the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) was concerned that it was subservient to the HRPDC. As part of the reform, in May 2008, several Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) were executed by the HRPDC and the newly named Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) in order to share financial and administrative staff support. Mr. Farmer stated he created both an HRPDC and HRTPO Deputy Executive Director position responsible for overseeing the daily operations of their respective organizations. In November 2013, an MOU was approved between the HRPDC and the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance (HRMFFA) to share staff, financial resources, and building space. In HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 7 Attachment 16-A2

27 January of this year, the HRPDC and the HRTPO formally adopted an MOU to create a joint Personnel and Budget Committee. Mr. Farmer believed the HRTAC, if approved through legislation, would be established by July 2014 and housed in the Regional Building with at least an Executive Director and Project Manager. The Executive Director and any other HRTAC staff would be collaborating with VDOT on a daily basis to manage the financing and construction of the HRTF projects. He indicated that from July 1, 2014 to July 1, 2015, at a minimum, the Deputy Executive Directors could act as Interim Executive Directors. He stated another option could be to have separate Executive Directors for both the HRPDC and HRTPO. The Boards would continue to act autonomously and staffing could be shared between the HRPDC, HRTPO, HRMFFA, and the HRTAC. He indicated the elimination of his position, serving both entities, along with the two Deputies coming forward as new Executive Directors, could possibly deter any budgetary increases. Mayor Wright thanked Mr. Farmer for his presentation and stressed that he provided the briefing at the request of the HRTPO and HRPDC Chairs. Mayor Sessoms stated the HRTPO is faced with an immense opportunity to construct transportation projects that will benefit the entire region and questioned whether it was realistic to change the structure of the HRPDC and HRTPO with no budgetary increase to personnel costs. Mr. Farmer replied the HRTPO has an enormous obligation to the public regarding the utilization of the HRTF funds and acknowledged that it might be wise to invest in HRTAC leadership roles. Mr. Louis Jones commented that with four different organizations sharing staff resources, it would be necessary to have one person oversee them in order to ensure continuity. Mayor Clyde Haulman noted as a probable Board member of the HRPDC, HRTPO, and the HRTAC, it would seem more beneficial to have a single point of contact to coordinate the Boards. Also, he indicated a single voice for the region s transportation and planning made more sense. Mayor Fraim expressed concern with having one Director responsible for three Boards as the HRTAC Director would be handling billions of dollars worth of projects. He believed it would be better to have a separate HRTAC Executive Director and combine the HRPDC and HRTPO Executive Director positions. Mayor Haulman appreciated Mayor Fraim s comments; however, he believed the Boards could find the right individual for the position who understands the big picture to coordinate the three Boards with the right Deputy Executive Directors to oversee the daily operations. Mr. Jeff Florin agreed with Mayor Fraim and stated that although there is synergy between the organizations, there is the opportunity for a nationwide search to find a dynamic HRTAC Executive Director. He also suggested the hiring of a financial person that would be similar to the position held in the P3 Office in Richmond. HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 8 Attachment 16-A2

28 Mr. Farmer reminded the Boards that he has converted a part time employee to that of a full time position in order to handle the financial aspect of the HRTF revenues. Mr. Shepperd stated that while there is an advantage of having one leader, the subjects handled by the HRPDC and the HRTPO are significantly different and he expressed concern that the HRPDC may atrophy if not given the correct leadership and function. Mayor Wright replied this subject was discussed between the two Chairs and he recommended utilizing the Deputy Executive Directors as interims as a skeleton structure in order to deliberate more on how the final structure should be composed. Mr. Shepperd agreed with Mayor Wright s comments. Mr. Farmer stated it has been difficult for him to immerse himself in both the HRTPO and the HRPDC and give both organizations their due justice. He suggested that over the next 15 months, the Boards should remain flexible. Mayor Johnson stated that with the opportunity that has been presented to the HRTPO, it would be wise to spend the necessary dollars to ensure the right people are in leadership roles. Mr. Farmer agreed and indicated the Project and Financial Managers are highly skilled positions that need to be filled properly. Mr. Miller expressed concern with regards to duplication of effort between the HRTPO and HRTAC and stated the two organizations must be transparent in their processes and inextricably linked to be successful. Mr. Tyrone Franklin asked whether the current leadership structure could continue. Mr. Farmer replied that as Executive Director of three organizations, his efforts would be diluted simply because it would be too cumbersome. He suggested the matter be referred to the Joint P&B Committee with a recommendation forthwith at the March HRPDC and HRTPO meetings. Mayor Johnson asked that the P&B Committee be given exact responsibilities to be carried out by the HRTAC. Mr. Farmer replied affirmatively. Mr. Kevan Danker believed the area would benefit from a single, strong vision and suggested one Director who could coordinate between the three organizations. Mr. Farmer stated Delegate Chris Stolle is focused on statewide prioritization and has praised the HRTPO Board for its efforts on its prioritization initiative that was achieved three years ago. Mr. Miller commented that statewide prioritization will be a difficult process but once completed, it will benefit the entire Commonwealth. Ms. Jennifer Mitchell noted she was involved with the evolution of the NVTA and stressed the importance of having professional staff in place with an Executive Director, a CFO, a Transportation Planner, and administrative staff that could assist with outreach to the jurisdictions. She agreed that project management resources need to be specialized, and she encouraged the HRPDC and the HRTPO members to reach out to their Northern HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 9 Attachment 16-A2

29 Virginia colleagues to obtain their knowledge regarding the NVTA process. She indicated the HRTAC would be a difficult program to administer. Mayor Wright recommended the matter be referred to the Joint P&B Committee with a recommendation forthwith at the March HRPDC and HRTPO meetings. Chair Price agreed and stated the HRTPO will continue to watch the status of HB1253/SB513 in order to better understand which direction the leadership roles should evolve for the organizations. Old/New Business There was no old/new business. Adjournment With no further business to come before the HRPDC and the HRTPO, the retreat adjourned at 12:19 p.m. McKinley Price Chair Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary HRPDC/HRTPO Retreat Minutes February 20, 2014 Page 10 Attachment 16-A2

30 16B. HRTPO FINANCIAL STATEMENT The Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for the activities of December 2013 and January 2014 are attached. These statements reflect the financial status of the HRTPO as a whole. Attachment 16-B1 Attachment 16-B2 Recommended Action: Accept the HRTPO Financial Statements. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

31 HRTPO FISCAL YEAR /31/2013 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Annual Budget Previous YTD Current Month REVENUES YTD VDOT-PL SEC 112 FEDERAL $ 2,107,317 $ 444,915 $ - $ 444,915 VDOT-PL SEC 112 STATE 275,378 55,614-55,614 VDOT-PL SEC 112 LOCAL 275,378 55,614-55,614 VDOT CMAQ Grant 283,483 57,623 42, ,568 VDOT CMAQ Grant (STATE) 111, HRT MATCH 25,000 3,903-3,903 WAT MATCH 12, STATE PASS-THROUGH 37,500 3,903-3,903 FEDERAL PASS-THROUGH 300,000 31,224-31,224 VDRPT 5303 FEDERAL 353,479 45,304-45,304 VDRPT 5303 STATE 44,186 5,662-5,662 VDRPT 5303 LOCAL 28,903 5,663-5,663 Total Revenue $ 3,854,424 $ 709,425 $ 42,945 $ 752,370 EXPENSES PERSONNEL $ 2,519,996 $ 840,871 $ 183,196 $ 1,024,067 CONTRACTUAL 112,552 14,174-14,174 SPECIAL CONTRACTS 42,798 26,434 74, ,882 OFFICE SERVICES 330,556 33,760 3,737 37,497 PASS THROUGH EXPENDITURES 848,522 39,029-39,029 INDIRECT COSTS - 187,825 33, ,463 Total Expenses $ 3,854,424 $ 1,142,094 $ 295,019 $ 1,437,112 AGENCY BALANCE $ - $ (432,669) $ (252,073) $ (684,742) Attachment 16-B1

32 HRTPO FISCAL YEAR /31/2014 STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Annual Budget Previous YTD Current Month REVENUES YTD VDOT-PL SEC 112 FEDERAL $ 2,107,317 $ 444,915 $ 534,166 $ 979,081 VDOT-PL SEC 112 STATE 275,378 55,614 66, ,385 VDOT-PL SEC 112 LOCAL 275,378 55,614 66, ,385 VDOT CMAQ Grant 283, , ,568 VDOT CMAQ Grant (STATE) 111, HRT MATCH 25,000 3,903 5,270 9,173 WAT MATCH 12,500-7,008 7,008 STATE PASS-THROUGH 37,500 3,903 12,279 16,182 FEDERAL PASS-THROUGH 300,000 31,224 98, ,456 VDRPT 5303 FEDERAL 353,479 45,304 21,271 66,575 VDRPT 5303 STATE 44,186 5,662 2,659 8,321 VDRPT 5303 LOCAL 28,903 5,663 2,659 8,322 Total Revenue $ 3,854,424 $ 752,370 $ 817,087 $ 1,569,457 EXPENSES PERSONNEL $ 2,519,996 $ 1,024,067 $ 198,130 $ 1,222,197 CONTRACTUAL 112,552 14,174-14,174 SPECIAL CONTRACTS 42, , ,932 OFFICE SERVICES 330,556 37,497 9,490 46,987 PASS THROUGH EXPENDITURES 848,522 39, , ,818 INDIRECT COSTS - 221,463 40, ,621 Total Expenses $ 3,854,424 $ 1,437,112 $ 370,618 $ 1,807,730 AGENCY BALANCE $ - $ (684,742) $ 446,469 $ (238,273) Attachment 16-B2

33 16C. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add one project as follows: UPC Lee Hall Depot Rehabilitation Phase 3. Project includes installation of security and fire systems, roof reconstruction, and exterior painting. o Add project to TIP o Total Cost Estimate: $1,004,683 (CN Only Project) o Add following obligations CN Phase - $748,390 STP/EN funds in FFY12, with Match of $187,098 CN Phase - $55,356 AC funds in FFY12, with Match of $13,839 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from January 29, 2014 through February 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-C Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

34 Attachment 16-C

35 Attachment 16-C

36 16D. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add one project as follows: UPC Pedestrian Improvements at the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Boykin Lane. This project consists of installing a high-visibility crosswalk and curb ramps in the northern portion of the intersection. o Add project to TIP o Total Cost Estimate: $29,529 o Add following phase obligations PE Phase - $4,500 HSIP funds in Previous Obligations, with Match of $500 PE Phase - $1,723 HSIP funds in FFY14, with Match of $191 PE Phase - $288 AC funds in FFY14, with Match of $32 CN Phase - $19,877 HSIP funds in FFY12, with Match of $2,209 CN Phase - $188 AC funds in FFY14, with Match of $21 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from January 29, 2014 through February 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-D Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

37 Gregory A. Whirley Commissioner DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1700 NORTH MAIN STREET SUFFOLK, VIRGINIA January 27, 2014 Mr. Michael S. Kimbrel Principal Transportation Engineer Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization The Regional Building, 723 Woodlake Drive Chesapeake, Virginia Dear Mr. Kimbrel: VDOT requests that the HRTPO amend the FY TIP to add UPC Sidewalk project. The scope of work consists of installing high visible crosswalk and curb ramps in the northern part of the intersection at Jefferson Avenue and Boykin Lane. Attached are the proposed TIP workup sheet and a copy of the project allocations for your reference. Proposed TIP Administrative Amendment: Add project to the HRTPO TIP Total Estimate Cost: $29,529 (PE $7,234; CN $22,295) Add PE $1,723 FFY14 HSIP for PE Phase Add match of $191 for PE Phase Add PE $288 AC FFY14 for PE Phase and add $32 match for PE Phase Add CN $19,877 FFY12 HSIP for CN Phase Add match of $2,209 for CN Phase Add CN $188 AC FFY14 for CN Phase and add $21 match for CN Phase Previous Obligations on PE Phase of $4,500 HSIP with $500 match based on original PE estimate of $5000 (obligated 11/10/2010) If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please contact me at (757) Sincerely, Sonya Hallums-Ponton District Program Manager Westside Area Hampton Roads District Attachment 16-D

38 Attachment 16-D

39 16E. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add three projects as follows: UPC I-64 Corridor Congestion Improvements HRBT Control Room Upgrade. Project is to prepare a plan set for upgrading the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel control room operations to support smart roadway technology advancement. o Add project to TIP o Total Cost Estimate: $500,000 (PE Phase) o Add PE Phase obligation of $500,000 AC (Other) funds in FFY14 UPC I-664 Corridor Congestion Improvements Communication System Upgrades at the MMMBT. Project is to prepare a plan set for upgrading the Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge-Tunnel communications system to support lane control, closed-circuit television (CCTV), and other smart roadway technologies. o Add project to TIP o Total Cost Estimate: $310,000 (PE Phase) o Add PE Phase obligation of $310,000 AC (Other) funds in FFY14 UPC I-64 Corridor Technology Advancements on Alternate Routes to I- 64 Routes 60, 143, and 199 Signal Communications Cameras. Project is located in James City County and York County between the Newport News City Line and the New Kent County Line. Project is for Preliminary Engineering for signal/arterial technology on alternative routes to I-64 in the Counties of James City and York, including adaptive signal control technology, CCTV and broadband communications to connect to the traffic operations center (TOC), signal upgrades, and alternate/backup power sources. o Add project to TIP o Total Cost Estimate: $385,000 (PE Phase) o Add PE Phase obligation of $385,000 AC (Other) funds in FFY14 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-E Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

40 Attachment 16-E

41 Attachment 16-E

42 Attachment 16-E

43 Attachment 16-E

44 Attachment 16-E

45 16F. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add one project as follows: UPC Cape Henry Lighthouse Restoration. This project is a child project to UPC 15149, a project for repair and maintenance of the Cape Henry Lighthouse and improvements necessary for public access, which is included in the current TIP. o Add project to TIP o Total cost estimate = $403,477 o Add CN Phase obligation of $322,390 STP/EN funds, with $80,598 in matching funds, in FFY14 o Add CN Phase obligation of $391 Advance Construction (AC) funds, with $98 in matching funds, in FFY14 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-F Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

46 Attachment 16-F

47 MPO TIP Report Hampton Roads MPO Enhancement Projects 2/6/2014 2:59:00 PM UPC NO SCOPE Rehabilitation of Historic Bldgs/Facilities SYSTEM Enhancement JURISDICTION Virginia Beach OVERSIGHT NFO PROJECT Cape Henry Lighthouse Restoration, C502 ADMIN BY Locally DESCRIPTION PROGRAM NOTE TIP AMD TO ADD $322,390 STP/EN FFY14 AND ADD $391 AC(OTHER) FFY14 CN (CLK ). ROUTE/STREET EN94 TOTAL COST $403,477 CN Federal - STP/EN $80,598 $0 $0 $322,390 $0 CN AC MPO Note FROM: Repair and maintenance of the structure and the improvements TO: necessary for public access FUND SOURCE MATCH FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Federal - AC $98 $0 $0 $391 $0 1 Attachment 16-F

48 16G. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add one project as follows: UPC Ferry Plantation House Restoration. This project is a child project to UPC 70305, a project for restoration of Ferry Plantation House, which is included in the current TIP. That project included the replacement of the oyster shell stucco, Americans with Disabilities (ADA) restrooms, replacement of walkway brick pavers, restoration of the scenic vista, and installation of a historical marker. o Add project to TIP o Total cost estimate = $60,924 o Add CN Phase obligation of $48,739 STP/EN funds, with $12,185 in matching funds, in FFY14 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-G Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

49 Attachment 16-G

50 MPO TIP Report Hampton Roads MPO Enhancement Projects 2/6/2014 3:00:42 PM UPC NO SCOPE Rehabilitation of Historic Bldgs/Facilities SYSTEM Enhancement JURISDICTION Virginia Beach OVERSIGHT NFO PROJECT Ferry Plantation House, C502 ADMIN BY Locally DESCRIPTION PROGRAM NOTE TIP AMD TO ADD $48,739 STP/EN FFY14 CN (CLK ). ROUTE/STREET EN03 TOTAL COST $60,924 FUND SOURCE MATCH FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 CN Federal - STP/EN $12,185 $0 $0 $48,739 $0 MPO Note 1 Attachment 16-G

51 16H. FY TIP AMENDMENT: VDOT Attached is a request from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to amend the Hampton Roads FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to add one project as follows: UPC Norfolk Citywide Intersection Safety Improvements Group 3. This project will implement safety improvements at multiple intersections in Norfolk. The project is related to UPC (Group 1) and UPC (Group 2). o Add project to TIP o Total cost estimate = $4,502,426 o Add PE Phase obligation of $571,590 HSIP funds in FFY12 o Add PE Phase obligation of $18 HSIP funds in FFY13 o Release PE Phase obligation of $352,064 HSIP in FFY14 o Updated PE Phase state match is $24,394 o Add RW Phase obligation of $18,125 HSIP funds, plus state match of $2,014, in FFY14 o Add CN Phase obligation of $3,407,013 HSIP funds, plus state match of $378,557, in FFY14 o Add CN Phase obligation of $407,501 Advance Construction (AC) funds, plus state match of $45,278, in FFY14 The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-H Recommended Action: Approve the TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

52 Attachment 16-H

53 Attachment 16-H

54 16I. FY TIP REVISION: CMAQ Fund Transfer Request Newport News Attached is a request from Newport News to transfer CMAQ funds from two projects to a third CMAQ project. A project to construct a bus transfer center in the vicinity of Riverside Hospital (UPC ) has been canceled with CMAQ funds remaining. A project to construct a bikeway/sidewalk along Oyster Point Road (UPC 16103) received funds from another source, which resulted in surplus CMAQ funds remaining. The City desires to transfer these available funds to a current CMAQ project to construct a multipurpose trail in the vicinity of the Mariners Museum (UPC 83254), as follows: UPC Riverside Bus Transfer Center o Project canceled o Transfer $296,778 FY 2012 CMAQ, including state match, to UPC UPC Oyster Point Roads Phase 4 Wide Sidewalk o Transfer $701,422 FY 2007 CMAQ, including state match, to UPC UPC Mariners Museum Multi-purpose Trail o Transfer $296,778 FY 2012 CMAQ, including state match, from UPC o Transfer $701,422 FY 2007 CMAQ, including state match, from UPC Should the HRTPO Board approve the fund transfers, a TIP amendment will be processed to reflect the transfers. In anticipation of Board approval, the City s request was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the CMAQ fund transfers and associated TIP amendment. Attachment 16-I Recommended Action: Approve the CMAQ transfers and associated TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

55 Attachment 16-I

56 16J. BALANCING FY CMAQ AND RSTP ALLOCATIONS The HRTPO Board approved the allocation of available CMAQ and RSTP funds through FY 2020 during its meeting on January 16, On February 7, 2014, however, HRTPO staff received an update of the CMAQ and RSTP preliminary estimates (marks) for the years FY The updated marks were lower than the previous marks for the same period, resulting in over-allocations for Hampton Roads of approximately $3.0 million for CMAQ and $4.4 million for RSTP. HRTPO staff developed a strategy for adjusting the FY allocations to balance with the updated marks, while affecting as few projects as possible. The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) has recommended approval of the HRTPO staff strategy. The attached Tables 1 (RSTP) and 2 (CMAQ) show all of the Hampton Roads projects that have RSTP and/or CMAQ allocations in the years FY 2015 through FY In the tables, the projects affected by the recommended balancing strategy are shaded (2 out of 22 RSTP projects in Table 1; and 19 out of 51 CMAQ projects in Table 2). Allocations that were changed from what was approved by the HRTPO Board in January are shown in bold red font in each of the tables. Assuming HRTPO Board approval of the revised CMAQ and RSTP allocations as shown in the attached tables, the HRTPO FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) will be amended to account for changes in the allocations through FY The TIP amendment was made available for public review and comment from February 26, 2014 through March 12, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the TIP amendment. Attachment 16-J Recommended Action: Approve the updated CMAQ and RSTP allocations and the associated TIP amendment. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

57 Table 1: FY RSTP Allocations by Project Adjustments Required Due to Updated Marks Received on February 7, 2014 RSTP ID Jurisdiction UPC Project Description FY 15 Allocation FY 16 Allocation FY 17 Allocation FY 18 Allocation FY 19 Allocation FY 20 Allocation Earmarked FY 21 & Beyond 1 Virginia Beach Lynnhaven Pkwy Reconstruction Phase XI $1,200,000 2 Suffolk Route 337 Nansemond Pkwy Widen to 4 lanes 3 Norfolk Norfolk 9783 North Military Hwy & Robin Hood Rd Widening & Improvement North Military Hwy Widening & Improvement Lowery Rd to Northampton Blvd $3,503,982 5 Poquoson Wythe Creek Rd Widen to 5 L (Alphus to SCL) $6,000,000 $2,295,862 6 York Co Route 17 Widening $2,600,000 7 HRT T Virginia Beach/HRT T9108 LRT Extension to Norfolk Naval Station and Virginia Beach Oceanfront (AA/EIS/PE/FD/ROW) Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study (AA/SDEIS/PE/FE) $8,000,000 $2,599,896 9 HRT T9126 Purchase 45 forty foot replacement buses $275, Chesapeake U.S. Route 17 Replace Bridge Over So. Branch Elizabeth River $12,323, Hampton Wythe Creek Road Widening $3,183,793 $3,840,780 $3,267,939 $9,374, Newport News Amtrak Station Relocation Project $633,268 $347, Newport News 4483 Atkinson Blvd Construct New Road $10,000,000 $20,885,705 $9,468,448 $6,851, Virginia Beach Regional Signal Preemption Program $133, Isle of Wight Co Turner Drive and Route 10/32 Intersection improvements $300, HRT T11778 Purchase 41 forty foot replacement buses $1,314, James City Co Skiffes Creek Connector $5,366,235 $7,273,942 $9,859,208 $2,500, James City Co Croaker Road Widening $500,000 $2,000,000 $1,000, James City Co Route 60 Multi Modal Corridor Upgrade $800,000 $1,300, Suffolk Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Upgrades $135,000 $1,515,000 Attachment 16-J 21 Virginia Beach Centerville Turnpike Widening fr. Kempsville Rd to Indian River Rd $3,880,091 $4,856,552 $4,263, WATA T11932 Administration and Operations Facility: Phase 1 $3,700,000 $3,000,000 $2,300,000 Totals $26,163,343 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $2,500,615 New Marks $26,163,343 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 $26,797,063 Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,296,448 Shaded projects indicate projects for which allocations were adjusted. Prepared by HRTPO staff on March 5, 2014

58 Table 2: FY CMAQ Allocations by Project Adjustments Required Due to Updated Marks Received on February 7, 2014 CMAQ Jurisdiction UPC Project Description FY 15 Allocation FY 16 Allocation FY 17 Allocation FY 18 Allocation FY 19 Allocation FY 20 Allocation Earmarked FY 21 & Beyond Project Selection Process Rank Year of Projection Selection 1 Gloucester Co Isle of Wight Co Route 17 Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements Courthouse Highway and North Court Street Pedestrian Improvements $546, Chesapeake/HRT T9111 Liberty Street Transit Improvements Portsmouth Gloucester Co Portsmouth Signal Timing Improvements Phase III George Washington Memorial Highway Signal Timing Improvements $964, VPA Inter Terminal Barge Service $1,863, Virginia Beach Indian River Road Intersection Improvements at Kempsville Road $1,094,841 $433, Newport News Newport News Signal Timing Improvements $250, Chesapeake Chesapeake Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvements $700, WATA T10862 Miscellaneous Transit Mounts Bay Route $327, HRT T HRT T9126 Miscellaneous Transit Environmental Management Systems Transit Vehicles Bus Replacement and Rebuild $150, $1,980,407 $436, WATA T9148 Miscellaneous Transit Bus Replacement $1,028,278 $1,484, Suffolk Harbour View Signal Timing Improvements $1,500,000 $1,925, Attachment 16-J 14 Regionwide James City Co Norfolk Hampton Roads Intelligent Transportation System Improvements Monticello Avenue Intersection Improvements at Ironbound Road Norfolk Signal System Improvements Phase IV $500,000 $759,861 $240, $777,673 $117, $1,140,000 $1,000,000 $1,440, HRT T14104 TRAFFIX Program $986,503 $986,503 $986,503 $986,503 $986,503 $986,503 $986, Portsmouth Portsmouth Signal Timing Improvements Phase IV $132, Hampton Hampton Signal Upgrades Phase IV $553, Isle of Wight Co Main Street Pedestrian Improvements $165, Gloucester Co Portsmouth Hayes Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Portsmouth Boulevard Intersection Improvements Elmhurst Lane $17,016 $1,345, $500,000 $

59 Table 2: FY CMAQ Allocations by Project Adjustments Required Due to Updated Marks Received on February 7, 2014 CMAQ Jurisdiction UPC Project Description FY 15 Allocation FY 16 Allocation FY 17 Allocation FY 18 Allocation FY 19 Allocation FY 20 Allocation Earmarked FY 21 & Beyond Project Selection Process Rank Year of Projection Selection 23 Newport News Lee Hall Bus Transfer Center Newport News Gloucester Co Norfolk Newport News Intelligent Transportation System Upgrades Guinea Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Norfolk Signal Timing Improvements Phase III $300,000 $ $183, $200,000 $200,000 $200, Newport News Citywide Signal Retiming $300,000 $160,000 $440, VPA Green Operator (GO): Truck Replacement Program $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $500, James City Co Route 199 & Brookwood Dr $50,000 $25,000 $125,000 $75, VPA Hampton (GO): Ocean Going Vessel Hybridization & Fuel Switching Demo Project Citywide Traffic Signal System Retiming (133 signals) $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $500, $471,941 $226, Newport News Amtrak Station Relocation $6,302,964 $6,152,443 $4,563, James City Co Route 199 West Ramp at Richmond Road $41,172 $63,828 $350,000 $195, Newport News Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements $250,000 $250,000 $500, HRT Purchase Replacement Ferry $2,000, Poquoson Traffic Signal Upgrade $260, Attachment 16-J 37 Suffolk Bridge Road Signal Coordination and ITS Network $150,000 $1,107, Portsmouth Signal System Citywide Upgrades $1,000,000 $2,200,000 $800, HRT T11777 Purchase 29 Twenty nine Foot Replacement Buses $557,279 $2,646,376 $3,223, WATA T11782 Purchase Five Replacement Trolleys $432, Hampton Cunningham Drive Sidewalk Project $920, Suffolk Virginia Beach Shoulders Hill Road Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvements First Colonial Road & Laskin Road Intersection Improvements $272, $1,000, Poquoson South Lawson Park Bike Path $195, Portsmouth Clifford/Bart/South Street Bike Boulevard $500,

60 Table 2: FY CMAQ Allocations by Project Adjustments Required Due to Updated Marks Received on February 7, 2014 CMAQ Jurisdiction UPC Project Description FY 15 Allocation FY 16 Allocation FY 17 Allocation FY 18 Allocation FY 19 Allocation FY 20 Allocation Earmarked FY 21 & Beyond Project Selection Process Rank Year of Projection Selection 46 Suffolk Shoulders Hill Rd/Nansemond Pkwy/Wilroy Rd Signal Coordination & ITS Network $1,641,029 $1,106, HRT T11778 Purchase 41 Forty Foot Replacement Buses $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,398, WATA T11779 Purchase 7 CNG Replacement Buses $3,073, WATA T Gloucester Co Purchase 8 Diesel Electric Hybrid Replacement Buses Roaring Springs Bike Path & Main St Sidewalk Gap Correction $125,000 $125,000 $1,290,490 $4,939, $452, James City Co Centerville Road & News Road $120, Totals $13,762,914 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $12,195,013 NEW MARKS $13,762,914 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 $14,195,908 Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,895 Shaded projects indicate projects for which allocations were adjusted. Prepared by HRTPO staff on March 5, 2014 Attachment 16-J

61 16K. PRIORITIZING HIGHWAY PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EVACUATION Under current conditions, in the event of a hurricane it is possible that only a portion of the people living in homes in low-lying areas of Hampton Roads will be able to evacuate. Due to the number of households in low-lying areas, and given the current capacity of evacuation highways (including the planned reversal of I-64), it may take 36 hours to clear evacuation highways for a Category 3 storm. However, due to the uncertainty associated with the final path of an approaching storm, local citizens and governments may not begin evacuation 36 hours before the arrival of tropical storm force winds. Therefore, to increase the likelihood of evacuation success, it is desirable to increase the capacity of evacuation highways. Given that no prioritized list of highway projects for improving evacuation exists for Hampton Roads, the purpose of this study (enclosed) is to prepare a prioritized list of highway projects that improve evacuation. The report was made available for public review and comment from January 8, 2014 through January 22, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the report. Enclosure 16-K: Prioritizing Highway Projects for Improvement of Evacuation Final Recommended Action: Approve the report. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

62 16L. POSITIONING HAMPTON ROADS FOR FREIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING MAP-21 legislation included a number of provisions to improve the condition and performance of the National Freight Network and support investment in freight-related surface transportation projects. It places strong emphasis on freight movement and requires participation from States, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and other stakeholders. States and MPOs that are organized, with data and analyses, will better position themselves for potential funding initiatives in the next authorization. This study analyzed Hampton Roads highways that are anticipated to be part of the National Freight Network. It addressed several required elements of the Hampton Roads portion of the National Freight Strategic Plan where data is available (condition and performance, freight bottlenecks on highways, forecasted truck volumes, major trade gateways). Upon approval by the HRTPO Board, the findings of this regional study will be forwarded to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), with a copy to the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), in order to assist its development of the National Freight Strategic Plan. The report was made available for public review and comment from January 8, 2014 through January 22, The Transportation Technical Advisory Committee has recommended approval of the report. Enclosure 16-L: Positioning Hampton Roads for Freight Infrastructure Funding Final Recommended Action: Approve the report. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

63 16M. PHASE 2B HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY During FY 2011, in the interest of improving the region s potential for passenger rail service, the HRTPO retained the services of Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS). The work of TEMS has resulted in the completion of the following: Preliminary Vision Plan (Phase 1), Blueprint Study (Phase 1B), and Data Collection (Phase 2A). With the completion of the Data Collection report, work began in March 2013 on the Passenger Rail Alternatives Analysis (Phase 2B). The focus of this study was to develop the financial and business plan evaluation of the Norfolk-Richmond-Washington, D.C. High-Speed Corridor, in line with the program set out in the Blueprint Study (Phase 1B). The Draft Phase 2B report has been completed by TEMS and has been presented to the HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force at its February 13, 2014 meeting. The report has been made available to the public from February 13, 2014 through February 28, Comments were received and incorporated in the final report. This item and enclosures were discussed under Workshop Item #10. Recommended Action: Approve the report. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

64 16N. PHASE 2B SUPPLEMENT HAMPTON ROADS PASSENGER RAIL STUDY: SCOPE OF WORK During FY 2011, in the interest of improving the region s potential for passenger rail service, the HRTPO retained the services of Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. (TEMS). The work of TEMS has resulted in the completion of the following: Preliminary Vision Plan (Phase 1), Blueprint Study (Phase 1B), and Data Collection (Phase 2A). With the completion of the Data Collection report, work began in March 2013 on the Passenger Rail Alternatives Analysis (Phase 2B). The focus of this study is to develop the financial and business plan evaluation of the Norfolk-Richmond-Washington, D.C. High- Speed Corridor, in line with the program set out in the Blueprint Study (Phase 1B). In Phase 2B, work proceeded with the Alternatives Analysis for the high speed Norfolk- Richmond-Washington, D.C. corridor, and the report is anticipated to be approved by the HRTPO Board in March The Phase 2B report concludes that a Norfolk-Richmond direct route can be linked cost effectively with enhanced passenger rail for the Newport News-Richmond corridor. As a result, it is important to collect the remaining data necessary (Engineering and Environmental) for the Newport News-Richmond corridor and review its potential integration with the Norfolk-Richmond direct high speed route. This analysis would produce the information needed for a Regional Passenger Rail Vision Plan for Hampton Roads, the development of an integrated program for implementing high and enhanced passenger rail to Hampton Roads from the Northeast Corridor, and preparation of a Service Development Plan (SDP) required by USDOT Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for funding. As outlined in the attached Scope of Work, the Phase 2B Supplement work will require two months to complete at a cost of $52,952. At its February 13, 2014 meeting, the HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force determined that the Norfolk-Richmond option that includes a link to the Newport News-Richmond corridor preliminarily evaluated in the Phase 2B report was a viable option and that a supplement to the Phase 2B report be pursued. This item and the attachment were discussed in the Workshop Agenda Item #11. Recommended Action: Authorize the Executive Director to execute the contract for Phase 2B Supplement with TEMS at a cost of $52,952. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

65 16O. HRPDC/HRTPO/HRTAC ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE AND SUCCESSION PLANNING As prescribed in the recently approved transportation legislation, the HRTPO staff recommends initiating the development of bylaws for the HRTAC as legally necessary. This new legislation, in addition to the announcement of the HRPDC/HRTPO Executive Director retiring on July 1, 2014, prompted the HRPDC and HRTPO to task the Joint HRPDC/HRTPO Personnel and Budget Committee to discuss and make a recommendation to the HRPDC/HRTPO Boards regarding the succession planning and organizational structure of the HRPDC and HRTPO. This item was discussed in the Workshop Agenda, see Item #12. Recommended Action: Initiate development of bylaws for the HRTAC and approve the Joint HRPDC/HRTPO Personnel and Budget Committee recommendation. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

66 16P. AUTHORIZING RESOLUTIONS FOR FY 2015 FEDERAL AND STATE GRANT APPLICATIONS Each year, the HRTPO applies for regional planning funds under two federal programs that supplement the primary planning funds the HRTPO receives under the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Section 112 Metropolitan Planning (PL) Funds program. One is the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5303 program and the other is the FHWA State Planning and Research (SPR) Funds program. Section 5303 funds are designated for transit planning and research activities. The FTA apportions Section 5303 funds for Virginia to the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT). Virginia MPOs receive their apportionments from DRPT based on an urbanized area population-based formula. These funds require a 20% match, which is typically divided between the state and the MPO or transit agency, each contributing 10%. The HRTPO retains a portion of Section 5303 funds and allots the remaining funds to Hampton Roads Transit and Williamsburg Area Transit Authority via pass-through agreements. SPR funds are administered by VDOT and are the primary source of funding for statewide long-range transportation planning. SPR funds require matching funds of 20%. Both programs require a resolution authorizing the HRTPO Executive Director to: File an application for the funds on behalf of the HRTPO Execute and file all necessary certifications and assurances, as well as any other documents or information required for the application Execute a grant agreement on behalf of the HRTPO The resolutions (attached) also certify that the local share required to match the federal funds shall be made available from resources available to the HRTPO. Attachment 16-P1 Attachment 16-P2 Recommended Action: Authorize the Executive Director to execute the above resolutions and file applications for FY 2015 transportation grants. HRTPO Board Meeting March 20, 2014 Agenda

67 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION BOARD RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FOR GRANTS OF FEDERAL FUNDS UNDER THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SECTION 5303 PROGRAM AND STATE MATCHING FUNDS. WHEREAS, the contract for financial assistance will impose certain obligations upon this Body, including the provision of the local funds to support project costs; and WHEREAS, a recipient of Federal Transit Administration Funding is required to provide certifications and assurances that all pertinent Federal statutes, regulations, executive orders and directives will be obeyed and it is the intent of this Body to comply fully with all required certifications and assurances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization that the Executive Director is authorized to: 1. Prepare and file an application on behalf of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation for federal and state financial assistance under the Federal Transit Administration Section 5303 Program and State Aid Program; 2. Execute and file with such application all necessary certifications and assurances or any other documents or information required by the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation in connection with the application or the project; 3. Execute a grant agreement on behalf of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation for the use of FTA Section 5303 Program and State Aid Program funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization certifies that the local share required to match the federal funds identified in the application shall be made available from resources available to this Body. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board at its meeting on the 20th day of March, Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Attachment 16-P1

68 HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION BOARD RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION DIRECTING STAFF TO ASSIST THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IN TRANSPORTATION RELATED MATTERS AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 23 USC 135. WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is seeking assistance in transportation planning related matters for the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) to comply with based on the provisions of 23 USC 135; and WHEREAS, the Federal State, Planning and Research (SP&R) funds in the amount of $58,000 are being made available to the HRTPO for the period of July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015; and WHEREAS, the HRTPO elects to provide the local share match of $14,500 to utilize SP&R funds for the benefit of the local jurisdictions comprising the Hampton Roads region. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization that the Executive Director is directed, for and on behalf of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization, to furnish such documents and other information as may be required to qualify for authorization under the agreement with VDOT and to administer such SP&R funds made available, certifying that they shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of 23 CFR Part 420, State, Planning and Research Program Administration. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board at its meeting on the 20th day of March, Dwight L. Farmer Executive Director/Secretary Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Attachment 16-P2