IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
|
|
- Abraham Henderson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-11-CA-788-OLG-JES-XR [Lead Case] RICK PERRY, et al., Defendants. LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC), DOMINGO GARCIA, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. SA-11-CA-855-OLG-JES-XR [Consolidated Case] RICK PERRY, et al., Defendants. REPLY BRIEF OF THE DAVIS PLAINTIFFS AND THE LULAC PLAINTIFFS The Davis Plaintiffs and the LULAC Plaintiffs respectfully submit this Reply Brief to the Briefs filed on February 10, 2012, by the State Defendants and the Estes Intervenors. ARGUMENT 1. The State Has Failed To Establish That Their Enacted Plan Is Free Of A Racially Discriminatory Purpose And Effect. The Brief filed by the State Defendants devotes a mere one page of their sixty (60) page brief to arguments regarding the state senate plan. In the brief, the State has made just two arguments in support of its enacted plan (S148): that it was enacted with partisan intent to protect Republican voting strength, and that the process used to enact it
2 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 2 of 11 was free of a racially discriminatory intent because the Senate Committee Redistricting Chair (Sen. Seliger) and the Senate Redistricting Committee Director (Doug Davis) met with every state senator and because 29 of 31 senators voted in favor of the plan on final passage. We addressed each of these arguments in our post-trial brief (at pp ) and in our proposed findings of fact (at pp.30-31). We would note here only a couple of additional points. First, regarding the purpose behind the plan, the State concedes that [i]n Texas, minority voters are predominantly Democratic. State s Brief at 52. Thus, even if it were true that the State sought to minimize the voting strength of Democrats, the State knew it was doing so at the expense of racial and language minorities. The state also contends that by fracturing off minority neighborhoods from SD 10, the State did not engage in purposeful discrimination simply because the senate map-drawer was aware that the areas being removed from SD 10 were heavily minority. Of course, there is much more evidence of racial purpose than the mere fact that the senate map drawers knowingly fragmented and carved out politically cohesive minority voters in SD 10, and that evidence is detailed in Plaintiff s Post-Trial Brief and in our Proposed Findings of Fact. See Plaintiffs post-trial brief (at pp. 4-15) and in Plaintiffs proposed findings of fact (at s 22-52). Regarding the process used to enact the map, it appears to be true that the Senate Redistricting Committee Chair and Mr. Doug Davis did meet with every senator at some point early on in the process to solicit their views about their districts. This much is not in dispute and is largely beside the point because the evidence offered from all 12 senators who represent majority-minority senate districts (Wendy Davis, Ellis, Gallegoes, 2
3 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 3 of 11 Hinojosa, Lucio, Rodriguez, Uresti, Van de Putte, Watson, West, Whitmire, and Zaffirini) was that senators representing minority opportunity districts were not given equal access throughout the process. PX 5. In their May 17, 2011 statement on the floor of the Senate, which was entered into the Senate Journal and made an official part of the record, these twelve senators protested that the views of their constituents were neither solicited nor given fair consideration. Id. The fact that Senator Seliger and Mr. Davis may have met with each senator once says very little and certainly doesn t dispel a finding that that the process was intentionally discriminatory. What speaks volumes about the discriminatory and racially exclusionary redistricting process is that Anglo Republican senators had numerous meetings and access to those drawing the senate map, while senators representing majority-minority districts, in the words of Senator Judith Zaffirini (PX 55 at 10), were excluded : 10 Q. Do you know whether any other senators 11 representing minority districts were able to have any 12 input into the drafting during this time? 13 A. They were not. 14 Q. How do you know that? 15 A. Because they told me. And because we signed a 16 letter explaining our vote regarding the Senate map. 17 And in that map we stated that we were not consulted 18 and, in fact, that we were excluded. Senator Rodney Ellis similarly testified that he was left out of the process and most of the members who represented minority districts, all of us were left out of the process. Sen. Rodney Ellis DC Trial Testimony at 95 (1/20/2012 am session). 3
4 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 4 of PLAN S167 Proposed By the State and Senator Estes Is Racially Discriminatory, Retrogressive of Minority Voting Strength, and Was Drawn with the Purpose of Denying Minority Voters in SD 10 an Effective Ability to Elect Their Candidate of Choice. The State and Intervenor Estes now proposes S167. These proponents of S167 make the following claims about S167, each of which is demonstrably false: Plan S167 proposed by Senator Craig Estes is not a compromise or even a legitimate effort to find middle-ground. It is a retrogression of minority voting strength in Senate District 10 because it will significantly reduce the current ability of Hispanics and African American voters in the district to elect their candidate of choice. The Anglo voting age population goes up, while the black and Hispanic voting age population BHVAP) goes down. The black population is reduced significantly, by 13%. The proponents of S167 claim that these demographic changes in SD 10 are de minimis (Estes Brief at 6), but they are wrong. What makes these demographic changes even more pernicious is they appear to be done in a manner that makes it appear the minority population demographics stay roughly the same but in fact there is a serious reduction of black and Latino voting strength. It is also noteworthy that the person who drew Plan S167 was Doug Davis, who drew the State s enacted map (S148) which was enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose and will have a retrogressive effect, and the same Doug Davis who helped draw the congressional map in 2003 that was struck down as a violation of the Voting Rights Act in LULAC v. Perry. Seliger DC Trial Testimony at 89 (1/24/2012am session). The changes to SD120 in Plan S167, though less subtle, are quite to those the State attempted in Congressional District 23 where population was manipulated to 4
5 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 5 of 11 made what appeared to be minor demographic changes, while actually doing material harm to minority voting strength. S167 boosts the influence of Anglo voters by increasing their raw numbers and their VAP population significantly relative to minority overall and particularly African American voters. S167 removes and adds far more people than required to accommodate the intrusion of SD22 into Tarrant County as occurred under the state s enacted plan or to allow for the western extension of SD9. SD22 requires only about 100,000 persons from either Tarrant County or Parker County. To bring this amount of population into SD 22, 30,000 to 50,000 persons at most must be removed from the Northeast Arm of SD10 to allow SD9 to extend west as the State desires. Yet, S167 removes nearly 200,000 persons from SD10 and then adds back into the district just over 180,000 persons. This extensive disruption of population is far more than needed to accomplish either Senator Estes or the State s stated goals. This movement of additional population, however, does allow the State to remove more minority voters who have effectively elected their candidate of choice and replace them with Anglos who reliably vote against minority candidates of choice. Precincts Removed from SD10 Under Plan S167 Just over 198,000 persons live in the precincts that are removed from SD10 under Plan S167. In 2008, these precincts cast approximately 78,690 votes and in 2010 cast 44,379 votes. The Anglo VAP in these precincts is 59.2%, the Black VAP is 21.2%, the Hispanic VAP is 16.8% and the B+H VAP is 33.1 percent. In raw numbers, the persons removed from SD 10 in these precincts under Plan S167 were 42,070 Blacks and 33,346 Hispanics, totaling over 75,000 combined. Approximately 5
6 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 6 of ,859 Anglos are removed. In 2008, President Obama received 43.4% support in the precincts removed from SD10 under Plan S167. Precincts Added to SD10 Under Plan S167 Just fewer than 184,000 persons live in the precincts added to SD10 under Plan S167. In 2008, these precincts cast approximately 63,553 votes and in ,442 votes. The Anglo VAP in these precincts is 66%, the Black VAP is 8.5%, the Hispanic VAP is 22.3 percent and the B+H VAP is 30.5 percent. In raw numbers, approximately 17,442 Blacks and 50,005 Hispanics totaling barely over 65,000 combined. Approximately 111,000 Anglos are added to SD10. President Obama received 40.8% support in these precincts. We detail the specific demographic changes to benchmark SD 10 made by S167 to show how minority voting strength was diminished, looking at three distinct geographic areas where changes were made to SD 10 that weaken minority voting strength: southwest Fort Worth, Arlington, and the northeast arm of SD 10. A. Fort Worth. One of the areas of Tarrant County where there is already a quite large African American base that is also experiencing significant growth in its minority population is the area of southwest Fort Worth, west of I35 and east of Benbrook Lake between Edgecliff Village to the North and Crowley to the South. Most of this area (which is two-thirds minority) is removed from SD10 under Plan S167 and will be left stranded in SD22. Thus, S167 takes the current and growing African American and Hispanic population in this area of southwest Fort Worth and submerges the voting strength of blacks and (and Hispanics) in this area into a strong Anglo-controlled Republican district (SD22). The roughly 60,000 people removed from this area by S167 are 61 % Black and Hispanic (B+H) and only 33 % Anglo. This population of 60,000 people in Southwest Fort Worth is replaced in S167 by population in far west Fort Worth north of I30, South of River Oaks going from Westover Hills west to the county line. The roughly 60,000 people added to SD10 from this area are nearly exact demographic opposite of the area 6
7 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 7 of 11 removed: 64% Anglo and only 33% Black plus Hispanic (B+H). Moreover, this is one of the few areas in Tarrant County where the Anglo population is growing more rapidly than the minority population. B. Arlington Precincts Removed Nine precincts in the City of Arlington with significant and growing minority populations were also removed from SD10 by SD 10. The approximately 44,000 people removed from these precincts are only 39% Anglo. Moreover, there was simply no reason to remove these precincts. Their removal is not required to accommodate Senator Estes desire to retain SD30 s configuration, the intrusion of SD22 into Tarrant County, or to maintain the Republican political strength of adjacent Districts 9 or 12. Clearly, these precincts were removed for the sole purpose of weakening current minority voting strength in SD10 and to render the minority growth taking place in these precincts as irrelevant to any election in the years ahead. C. Adjustments in Northeast Arm designed to further weaken minority voting strength in SD10 Rather than simply shortening the Northeast Arm in benchmark SD10 to accommodate the extension of SD9 to the north and west, S167 shifts the lower part of the arm to the west picking up an Anglo growth area in the cities of Bedford and Hurst. Though the Estes Intervenor claims that race was not used in the drawing of SD 10, the telltale sign that racial considerations were dominant in this shift is the obvious omission of Precinct 3247, which has a growing African American population. Senator Estes map drawer (Doug Davis) carefully but obviously cut around this precinct to avoid it being part of the shift of the Northeast Arm to the west. Doug Davis knows which neighborhoods in Tarrant County contain minority population whether he had the racial shading indicator on when he drew the map or not, because he admitted knowingly carving up these minority neighborhoods when he drew Plan S148. See Doug Davis DC Trial Testimony at (1/18/2012 a.m. session). Though Senator Estes claims his map was free of efforts to engage in partisan gamesmanship, there is evidence that the changes in SD 10 under Plan S167 in the northeast arm of the district were made to advantage a potential Republican candidate. For example, in addition to putting new predominately Anglo precincts into SD10 in that area, S167 also shifts arm of SD westward, apparently designed to make sure that as much of HD92 as possible was included in SD10 and not in SD9. The Northeast Arm shifts to the west to ensure that virtually all of HD 91, represented by right wing Republican Kelly Hancock, is placed within the newly configured SD9. 7
8 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 8 of 11 Simply put, Plan S167 is a cynical and disingenuous effort by Senator Estes and the State AG s office to undermine minority voting strength in SD 10 and thus to preclude an agreement on an interim map regarding SD10 s boundaries. The reduction in the minority population and the swaps of minority growth areas for Anglo growth areas were unnecessary in order for Senator Estes to retain Parker County and his overall desired configuration of SD30 (his claimed interest in intervening). In fact, no changes at all need to be made to SD30 in order to retain SD10 in essentially its benchmark configuration uniting the minority neighborhoods that share a distinct community of interest in Tarrant County. Rather, S167 is a subterfuge to hide the desire of the AG and Senator Estes to reduce the minority population and the minority voting strength in SD10 enough to make it far more difficult for minority voters in the district to elect their candidate of choice in 2012, and but to deny this ability to elect throughout the decade. Finally, we would note that Plans S168 and S169, which the Davis and LULAC Plaintiffs have made public today, are plans that each accomplish the stated goals of Senator Estes and the Attorney General with regard to an interim map. They put Senator Estes district back to its exact configuration as it existed in the state s enacted plan (S148). That should have resolved Senator Estes concerns, but it didn t. In fact, Senator Estes should have no standing to challenge SD 10 in this Court where, as here, he has been presented with two separate proposed interim maps that resolve his concerns by restoring his district as it existed in the state s enacted plan (S148). Instead, he insists on weakening minority voting strength in SD 10. Senator Estes and the State have refused to consider either of these plans (S168 or S169) as a proposed interim state senate plan because it does not accomplish their major goal of converting SD 10 to a district in which 8
9 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 9 of 11 the ability of minority voters to elect their preferred candidate of choice is diminished. It would be ironic indeed (and a violation of the Voting Rights Act) if this Court, in a case brought to protect voting rights of blacks and Hispanics, were to impose S167 as an interim state senate map, elevating the concerns of an Anglo senator who wants his Anglo-dominated district protected over the rights of minority voters in SD 10. This Court s priority in crafting a new senate redistricting plan should be protecting the voting rights of blacks and Hispanics in Tarrant County and not the rights of an Anglo senator to keep Parker County. CONCLUSION Plan S167 should be rejected by this Court as an interim map. Plans S168 and S169 could serve as interim state senate plans if this Court decides, contrary to our recommendation, to issue interim plans for 2012 before the DC court renders its decision. As we have previously advised this three-judge Court, we respectfully submit that this Court should await the decision of the DC preclearance court before crafting any interim plans. We recognize that this would necessitate the delay of primary elections, but the voters in Texas will be far better off going to the polls later under plans that have undergone the preclearance process and which, to the extent necessary, remedy any Voting Rights Act or Constitutional violations. It would render the Section 5 preclearance decision a nullity if this Court draws a plan now and then fails to revise its plan a few weeks from now as needed after the DC issues its ruling. Proceeding in such a manner would also be inconsistent with the Supreme Court s decision in Upham v. Seamon. Waiting until the DC Court rules before this Court issues either an interim or 9
10 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 10 of 11 final remedial plan is the best way to bring some degree of finality to the redistricting process. Respectfully submitted, /s/ David Richards DAVID RICHARDS State Bar No Richards, Rodriquez and Skeith, LLP 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1200 Austin, TX Tel (512) Fax (512) /s/ J. Gerald Hebert J. GERALD HEBERT D.C. Bar # Attorney at Law 191 Somerville Street, #405 Alexandria, VA Telephone: Counsel for Davis Plaintiffs /s/ Luis Roberto Vera, Jr. LUIS ROBERTO VERA, JR. League of United Latin American Citizens 111 Soledad St., Suite 1325 San Antonio, TX Counsel for LULAC Plaintiffs 10
11 Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 138 Filed 02/13/12 Page 11 of 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 13th day of February 2012, I filed and served the foregoing Reply Brief of the Davis Plaintiffs and the LULAC Plaintiffs by filing the same in this Court s ECF system, which caused copies of this document to be sent to counsel of record in this litigation. Those attorneys not registered in the ECF system were served via first-class mail. /s/ J. Gerald Hebert J. GERALD HEBERT 11
Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 170 Filed 03/22/13 Page 1 of 8
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 170 Filed 03/22/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, MARK VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 664 Filed 02/20/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 664 Filed 02/20/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 135 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 135 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. RICK
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 214 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 214 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv- 01303 (RMC-TBG-BAH)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 70 Filed 11/09/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS; MARC VEASEY; ROY BROOKS; VICKY BARGAS;
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1323 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1323 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1517 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1517 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al. Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 5:11-CV-0360-OLG-JES-XR
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 49 Filed 10/30/11 Page 1 of 18
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 49 Filed 10/30/11 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 536 Filed 11/25/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 536 Filed 11/25/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al. Plaintiffs And EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 649 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 649 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs and EDDIE
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 41 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 41 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1036 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1036 Filed 06/02/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1319 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1319 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 871-1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 1 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 871-1 Filed 08/22/13 Page 2 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1462 Filed 07/04/17 Page 1 of 24
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1462 Filed 07/04/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, HAROLD DUTTON, JR. AND GREGORY TAMEZ,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 68 Filed 07/25/11 Page 1 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 68 Filed 07/25/11 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, HAROLD DUTTON, JR. and GREGORY
More informationIn the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1494 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 9 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL. v. GREG ABBOTT, ET AL. SA-11-CV-360 QUESTIONS
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 832 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 832 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 105 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 20
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 105 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION MARGARITA V. QUESADA, 875 Marquette ) Drive,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 890 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 890 Filed 09/09/13 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 09/25/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 194-1 Filed 09/25/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 851 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 851 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 29 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 29 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ et al., Plaintiffs, MEXICAN AMERICAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1149 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ; et al, ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 224 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 224 Filed 07/05/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 1:11-cv- 01303 (RMC-TBG-BAH)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION LULAC OF TEXAS, MEXICAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON, TEXAS (MABAH), ANGELA GARCIA, BERNARDO J. GARCIA,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1590 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1590 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL., Plaintiffs v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1338 Filed 01/02/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1338 Filed 01/02/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al. Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 870 Filed 08/21/13 Page 1 of 13
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 870 Filed 08/21/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., - and - Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 118 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 26
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 118 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1313 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 13
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1313 Filed 05/26/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL. v. SA-11-CV-360
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 12 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ERIC H. HOLDER,
More informationWETERW TG-QF TXAS BY. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CLERK, U.S. DiSTR OUJT SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 486 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV 0 4 21 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CLERK, U.S. DiSTR OUJT SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WETERW
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 429 Filed in TXSD on 07/22/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISON
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 429 Filed in TXSD on 07/22/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISON MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No.
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 90 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 90 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationS1ERjT FILED OCT SA-11-CV-0360-OLG-JES-XR (CONSOLIDATED LEAD CASE) RICK PERRY, ET.AL.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1267 Filed 10/28/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET.AL. v. CIVIL NO: RICK
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 627 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 97
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 627 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 97 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE
More informationSENATOR KEL SELIGER 5/20/2014
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1095-5 Filed 06/13/14 Page 1 of 8 SENATOR KEL SELIGER 5/20/2014 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 2 SAN ANTONIO DIVISION 3
More informationCase 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00490 Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force, Joey Cardenas,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1518 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et. al., Plaintiffs, V. STATE
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 873 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 873 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 3 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 873 Filed 08/23/13 Page 2 of 3 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 873 Filed 08/23/13 Page
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 55 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, HAROLD DUTTON, JR. AND GREGORY
More informationPLAINITFF MALC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 779 Filed 07/12/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs and MEXICAN
More informationTexas Redistricting : A few lessons learned
Texas Redistricting 2011-12: A few lessons learned NCSL Annual Meeting August 7, 2012 David R. Hanna Senior Legislative Counsel Texas Legislative Council 1 Legal challenges for redistricting plans enacted
More informationCase 1:11-cv DLI-RR-GEL Document 182 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2214
Case 1:11-cv-05632-DLI-RR-GEL Document 182 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 2214 Via ECF Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann United States District Court 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1375 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1375 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 26
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1277-1 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1125 Filed 07/06/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1125 Filed 07/06/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., - and - Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 40 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 40 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ERIC HOLDER
More informationEx. 1. Case 1:13-cv TDS-JEP Document Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 6
Ex. 1 Case 1:13-cv-00660-TDS-JEP Document 108-1 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 6 Case 1:13-cv-00660-TDS-JEP Document 108-1 Filed 05/07/14 Page 2 of 6 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 990 Filed 05/06/14
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION LULAC OF TEXAS, MEXICAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON, TEXAS (MABAH), ANGIE GARCIA, BERNARDO J. GARCIA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. RICK PERRY, ET AL. Defendant. Civ. No. SA-11-CV-360-OLG-JES-XR ORDER On this
More informationCase 5:08-cv FB Document 13 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 5:08-cv-00389-FB Document 13 Filed 05/20/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION LULAC OF TEXAS, MEXICAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 474 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 16
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 474 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs and EDDIE
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 06/29/13 Page 1 of 11
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 184-1 Filed 06/29/13 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1613 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 13
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1613 Filed 01/29/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION GONZALO BARRIENTOS, ) RODNEY ELLIS, MARIO GALLEGOS, JR., ) JUAN CHUY HINOJOSA, EDDIE LUCIO, JR., ) FRANK L. MADLA,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of
More informationPLAINTIFF MALC S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACTAND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Plaintiff MALC submits these proposed findings of fact and
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1275 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 127 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 15
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 127 Filed 08/08/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ; HAROLD DUTTON, JR. GREGORY
More informationCase 4:12-cv Document 26 Filed in TXSD on 03/25/13 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:12-cv-03035 Document 26 Filed in TXSD on 03/25/13 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS (LULAC,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1193 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 13
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1193 Filed 07/30/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., - and - Plaintiffs,
More informationQUESADA PLAINTIFFS POST-TRIAL BRIEF
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1527 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., v. Plaintiffs, GREG ABBOTT,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT C
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1065-3 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT C Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1065-3 Filed 06/09/14 Page 2 of 17 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1065-3
More informationCase 2:03-cv TJW Document 323 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 2:03-cv-00354-TJW Document 323 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, ET AL.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1231 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 18
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1231 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 845 Filed 08/09/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ HAROLD, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1604 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 14
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1604 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL., Plaintiffs v. CIVIL
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 828 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 828 Filed in TXSD on 02/19/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 749-28 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al, Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION FILED SHANNON PEREZ; HAROLD DUTTON, JR.;
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-496 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOTION TO
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:12-cv-03035 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/11/12 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN ) CITIZENS (LULAC),
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 614 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 614 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al. Plaintiffs And EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 2
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 976-3 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT 2 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 976-3 Filed 04/16/14 Page 2 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
More informationNew Developments in the Meaning of the Voting Rights Act. Nate Persily Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science Columbia Law School
New Developments in the Meaning of the Voting Rights Act Nate Persily Beekman Professor of Law and Political Science Columbia Law School 1 New Developments Section 2 Bartlett v. Strickland (2009), LULAC
More informationCase 1:11-cv RMC-TBG-BAH Document 239 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-01303-RMC-TBG-BAH Document 239 Filed 07/03/13 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and ERIC
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 433 Filed in TXSD on 07/23/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 433 Filed in TXSD on 07/23/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 55 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00788-OLG-JES-XR Document 55 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WENDY DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 146 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 5723
Case 3:14-cv-00852-REP-AWA-BMK Document 146 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 5723 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION Golden Bethune-Hill, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationShelby County v. Holder and the Demise of Section 5: What is Next for Voting Rights in Texas?
The Sixteenth Annual Riley Fletcher Basic Municipal Law Seminar February 5-6, 2015 Texas Municipal Center - Austin, Texas Shelby County v. Holder and the Demise of Section 5: What is Next for Voting Rights
More informationCase 1:12-cv RMC-DST-RLW Document 24 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 24 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 16 STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiff, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIn the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1540 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 83 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL. v. GREG ABBOTT, ET AL. SA-11-CV-360 ORDER
More informationCase 4:11-cv RAS Document 48 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:11-cv-00059-RAS Document 48 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION KAAREN TEUBER, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1457 Filed 07/03/17 Page 1 of 32
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1457 Filed 07/03/17 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT 1
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1194-1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT 1 DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO QUESADA PLAINTIFFS TRIAL EXHIBITS-2011 CONGRESSIONAL 2 2003 Congress Submission Population Data
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1281 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 59
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1281 Filed 10/30/14 Page 1 of 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 110-2 116 Filed in in TXSD on 12/11/13 12/10/13 Page 1 of of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION UNITED STATES Plaintiff,
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 880 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 880 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 644 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 22
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 644 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationVOTER ID TRIAL FACT SHEET
VOTER ID TRIAL FACT SHEET DOJ: 50,000 DEAD VOTERS LACK PHOTO ID Evidence presented at trial by the State of Texas shows that Attorney General Holder s list of voters who lack government-issued photo identification
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 597-6 Filed 02/02/12 Page 1 of 177 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF TEXAS, : : Plaintiff, : vs. : Docket No. CA 11-1303 : UNITED
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 882 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 13
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 882 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs CIVIL
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 952 Filed 01/08/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 952 Filed 01/08/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, ET AL, Plaintiffs, v. RICK
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of Congressional Plan Perez v. Perry, et al.
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1250-1 Filed 09/19/14 Page 1 of 31 2011 Congressional Plan Perez v. Perry, et al. Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1250-1 Filed 09/19/14 Page 2 of 31 THE BURDEN
More informationCase 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 1366 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 1366 Filed 04/21/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, et al., v. Plaintiffs, STATE OF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 14A393, 14A402 and 14A404 MARC VEASEY, ET AL. 14A393 v. RICK PERRY, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL. ON APPLICATION TO VACATE STAY TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES,
More informationCharter Review Commission
Charter Review Commission The Town of Flower Mound Single Member Districts and the Town Council November 19, 2013 Presented by: Sydney Falk Bickerstaff Heath Delgado Acosta LLP Austin, Texas Issues Redistricting
More informationTexas Elections Part II
Texas Elections Part II In a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy. Matt Taibbi Regulation of Campaign Finance in Texas 1955:
More information