SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT SHEET. SP Douglas County Transportation and Land. o Denied. September 21, 2018

Transcription

1 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT SHEET Application #: Administering SP Douglas County Transportation and Land Type of Permit: Shoreline Approved Development o Denied Date of Action: September 21, 2018 Date Mailed to DOE/AG RCW and the County Regional Shoreline Master Program, a permit is Dwight Jensen, Riverview Enterprises Jeffrey Christiansen Bostian 5561 Kenwood Woodinville, WA Seattle, W A undertake the development: An for a shoreline development to two ground-based boatlifts. Upon the 2 Lots on Drive, Orondo, Within 200 feet Columbia River and/or ="'v...,l<u\,u wetlands. The project will be within a shoreline of state-wide significance CRCW The project located within a Conservancy designation. The County Regional Master Program is applicable to this development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken in conformance with the following terms and l. The project in on file submitted on May 9, The applicant shall comply with all local, state regulations. 3. A copy of and attached shall be kept be provided to contractor and all working within the area at all times. applicant, contractor, machinery operators and all others working within the shoreline area shall have read this permit and attached conditions follow its at all times. 4. The marked hazardous conditions for to the County. SP f6

2 5. number and date of 6. The application shall proceed with the Fish & Wild] Management and Mitigation by Grette ''''''"'V'UL'''', "",,,,"'''11''' May 9, Where a permanent means of shall be installed for the plantings that is designed by a landscape architect or equivalent professional. Said design meet the specific needs of riparian steppe vegetation. 8, as shown on the mitigation plan received May 9, 8 project. 9. A five year monitoring shall commence upon ofthe irrigation A surety in conformance with Title County Code between the property owner and Douglas County Transportation and Land Services upon ofthe shoreline County must approve for the cost of installation, plant material, soil amendments, irrigation, seed mix and necessary monitoring by the biologist of and Washington State tax. lo. The mitigation maintained to ensure the are successful. Maintenance shall ensure 100% survival of the 4 years following shall include as-needed undesirable plants; ",..r,tp{'t.".., nf'l t'i~{,f'i")ii" plants, and repair and and mitigation the first year and 80% to rectify problems, ''''',...".v shrubs and small trees any dead plants. 11. shall to Douglas County and mitigation installation; 3 years mitigation installation; and 5 years mitigation Monitoring reports shall by a qualified '-'''"'Av... ' defined by Douglas The biologist must that the conditions provisions in the Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan submitted by Grette ASSO(~lat:es, received May 9, 2018 satisfied. 12. Sequential release of funds with the surety with the conditions of approval and the management and occur in of 113 conformance with the standards that are not met are only minimally out actively being pursued owner to to consider a or more ofthe following plan. Release plan and conditions and contingency compliance, the may ofthe scheduled increment. Non-compliance can result in one carry-over of the surety amount to the next review period; use of to remedy the scheduling a with Douglas County to review conformance with the conditions of approval and to determine what actions may be appropriate. 13. Where a condition imposed Washington State Department Corps of to allow for project redesign found consistent Management Act 14. to installation ofthe project, County PUD, must may be found and Wildlife, HPA Douglas County Land with the approvals County Code, the requirements ofthe or permitting issued '-'u...'v. shall have agencies; Master Program, and ofapproval from applicable agencies, including the to the County. SP f6

3 15. Construction of been granted must be commenced within two (2) years ofthe Authorization to development granted by the (5) years from filing date ofthe permit. FINDINGS 1. The applicants are Jensen, Riverview LLC, Bostian Rd., Woodinville, WA and Christenson, 5561 Kenwood PI N, WA The is: Larry Grette '''""VvUW,",'' LLC, 151 S. StelOl, Wenatchee, WA is an application a shoreline substantial development permit to install 4. The project serve 2 Lots on Desert Shores Drive, Orondo, W A. 5. in addition to the val.n""f, community existing within the Columbia and within the Desert Shores 6. within the Rural Conservancy shoreline environment and is further within the NW of Section 21, Township 26N, 21 W.M., County, Washington. Douglas County Parcel (serving and ). 7. The properties are in the Rural zoning district. 8. The Columbia River Shoreline section ofthe subject properties is as Rural by the Douglas Regional Master Program. 9. WAC establishes criteria Management Substantial Development Permits. This states that a substantial development permit shall be granted only development is consistent policies and of the Act; provisions of this regulation; the applicable master program adopted or approved for the area. 10. A Fish & Wildlife Habitat Management and Mitigation Plan received May 9, 2018 was performed the project Associates. 11. The installation of the two boatlifts will impact the environment. A Wildlife Management and Mitigation has that a total of250 sq ft the boatlifts. 12. The application proposes 610 sq ft of mitigation. A planting plan is proposed within Fish & Wildlife and 13. proposed in the Wildlife Management and Mitigation meets the of the Douglas County Regional Master Program. 14. County a Determination on ;)el)telti 4,2018 in with WAC (Optional DNS). 15. Agency comments were received PllD. 16. No comments have been 17. Surrounding property owners were given the opportunity to comment on a copy ofthe decision, can appeal subject to Title 14. SP f6

4 18. Proper property owners were given the opportunity to hearing. 19. WAC requires that construction must be commenced within 2 years shoreline that for shall 5 years after the date ofthe shoreline permit. development will not adversely the general public, health, safety and 21. record public after legal was held on *, 18. and at the on behalf applicant was Lehman. Mr. Lehman,,","',Ull,"," that he with all representations within the and applicant had no objection to any the proposed conditions of No H..."'V... the public at the 23. At record public the entire staff file was admitted into 24. Public agencies with jurisdiction over this project were an opportunity to review Agencies that responded comments were into the and considered by the Hearing in rendering Decision. Any Conclusion of Law that is more correctly a of Fact is incorporated as such by this..",r,,,..,,,,,,(,p L CONCLUSIONS OF LAW As conditioned, the development meets the goals, policies implementation recommendations as set forth in Douglas Countywide Plan and the Douglas County Shoreline Master Program. 2. As conditioned, this proposal is consistent applicable state laws regulations. 3. As proposed, and "''-''''''''..., potential impacts the project can mitigated. 4. Public ntpt"pclrc will be by approval ofthis...,.,""'""0<> 5. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent Title 18 "Zoning" Title 19 "Environment" of the County 6. LJA'''''''''''''' has been ",..""nt~'rt authority to render this Decision. 7. Any Finding of that is more a Conclusion Law is incorporated as by this,.pr'''''p,n('p This permit is granted pursuant to the County Shoreline Master Program, as amended, and nothing in this permit shah excuse the applicant from compliance with any other state, or local statutes, ordinances, or applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter RCW). This may be rescinded pursuant to RCW (7) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms and conditions CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT THIS SHALL IS AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE AS Page 4 of6

5 DEFINED IN RCW (6) AND WAC , OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW (5)(a)(b)(c). Substantial progress toward construction of the project for which this permit has been granted must be accomplished within two (2) years of the filing date of this permit. Authorization to conduct development activities granted by this permit shall terminate five (5) years from the filing date of this permit. Approved this 21 sl day of September, Anyone aggrieved by this decision has twenty-one (21) days from the "date of receipt" as defined in RCW 43.21B.001 to file a petition for review with the Shorelines Hearings Board as provided for in Washington law. SP Page 5 of6

6 THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT TO A Date received the This conditional permit is approved/denied by the pursuant to Chapter RCW. Development shall be undertaken to the following additional terms and conditions: Authorized Official f6