FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/09/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/09/2017
|
|
- Isabella Charles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York, Petitioner, for an order pursuant to Section 2308(b) of the CPLR to compel compliance with the subpoenas on BROADWAY HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC. and DAVID HAKIMIAN, PETITION IN SUPPORT OF THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ITS INVESTIGATORY SUBPOENAS Index No. Motion Sequence Justice Respondents X Petitioner ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, Attorney General of the State of New York ( OAG ), complaining of the Respondents Broadway Hospitality Group, Inc. ( BHG ) and BHG s owner, David Hakimian ( Hakimian ) (collectively, Respondents ) herein, alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. This petition arises out of Respondents failure to fully comply with subpoenas issued by OAG in connection with an investigation under Executive Law 63(12) into violations of New York law in connection with their resale of thousands of tickets to concerts, sports events and plays in New York from 2011 through at least OAG has evidence that Respondents on their own and in partnership with other resellers to whom they provided financing and with whom they split profits, resold tickets without obtaining ticket reseller licenses, or posting bonds, or submitting bi-annual reports on their reselling to the state, all of which are required under the New York Arts & Cultural Affairs 1 1 of 10
2 Law. Indeed, Respondents continued to resell in violation of these requirements for a year and a half after they became aware that the OAG was investigating their apparent non-compliance with the law. 3. Additionally, OAG has evidence that Respondents and their reseller-partners used illegal ticket purchasing software known as bots to buy the tickets they resold, and they used multiple identities, payment methods, and internet addresses on ticketing site ticketmaster.com to fraudulently make their many purchases to a given show appear to have been made by separate, unrelated buyers to conceal their violation of Ticketmaster s ticket limits and anti-bot security measures. 4. As a result of their violations, Respondents earned millions of dollars in illegal profits by beating out New York consumers in the primary market for tickets at face value on ticketmaster.com, and then forcing these consumers to either pay inflated prices for the tickets on secondary market platforms such as stubhub.com or else miss out on cultural events altogether. 5. Pursuant to its authority under New York Executive Law 63(12), OAG issued an investigative subpoena seeking documents from BHG in December 2014 and another investigative subpoena seeking testimony from Hakimian in August Respondents failed to fully comply with the subpoenas. 7. Specifically, BHG submitted transaction records for 2011 through January 2015 that had gaps and inaccuracies without submitting more accurate data from the accounts under its possession and control with resale sites such as stubhub.com and other resale platforms, and it refused to produce any records for February 2015 through 2016; it failed to produce any of the requested communications with its reseller-partners; and it failed to produce the requested list of payment accounts used for its ticket purchases. 2 2 of 10
3 8. Additionally, Respondent Hakimian refused to appear to provide testimony. 9. On February 14, 2017, Respondents counsel represented that his clients would drop their objection to producing BHG s communications with the reseller-partners; the list of its payment accounts used for purchasing; and Hakimian s testimony. Respondents have not produced any of this evidence to date. 10. Additionally, Respondents maintain their objections to producing data exports from BHG s stubhub.com and other resale platform accounts, and any purchase and resale records for the period February 2015 through 2016 despite the fact that they continued to violate the law during that period. 11. Consequently, OAG requests that the Court order Respondents to fully comply with OAG s investigative subpoenas including to: (1) produce within 10 days the documents they previously agreed to produce (i.e., BHG s communications with the reseller-partners and the list of its payment accounts used for purchasing); (2) produce spreadsheet exports from BHG s stubhub.com and other resale platform accounts; (3) produce its records of purchases and resales for the period from February 2015 through 2016; and (4) provide Hakimian s agreed-to testimony within 10 days after producing documents. PARTIES 12. Petitioner Eric T. Schneiderman is the Attorney General of the State of New York. 13. Respondent BHG is a corporate ticket reseller with its primary offices at 1384 Broadway, Room 1207, New York, New York. On information and belief, BHG is a New York corporation. 3 3 of 10
4 14. Respondent Hakimian is the manager of BHG and its sole owner. Hakimian resides at 200 W. 67th Street, Apt. 32A, New York, New York. JURISDICTION 15. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Executive Law 63(12), under which OAG is authorized to take proof and make a determination of relevant facts and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the CPLR into whether a person or business entity has engaged in repeated fraudulent or illegal acts or persistent fraud or illegality in the carrying on, conducting, or transacting of business, and to seek injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement and damages for such violations. FACTS Investigation of Respondents 16. In 2013, OAG began an investigation into the ticket reselling industry that ultimately revealed rampant illegality, including enormous volumes of reselling unlicensed reselling and the illegal use of ticket-purchasing software known as bots and other fraudulent and deceptive purchasing practices. In January 2016, OAG issued a report based on comprehensive data that showed how resellers use these illegal practices to scoop up most desirable face-value tickets on sites such as ticketmaster.com beating out ordinary consumers and then demand exorbitant markups for those tickets on resale sites such as stubhub.com. See Stein Aff & Ex. 4 (Obstructed View: What s Blocking New Yorkers from Getting Tickets (Jan. 28, 2016)). 17. BHG s transaction records for January 2011 through January 2015 show that it resold hundreds of thousands of tickets to New York events, generating tens of millions of dollars in revenue and millions in profits during that period alone. See Stein Aff. 22 & Ex of 10
5 18. Public records show that BHG engaged in that reselling in violation of New York law requiring having the required ticket reseller s license or submitting the required bond or biannual reports to the state. See Stein Aff Respondents admitted that they also financed purchases by at least two other resellers, Tun Aung ( Aung ) and his company T&M Tkts. d/b/a T&M Tickets ( T&M ), and David Arking ( Arking ) both in his capacity as an employee of BHG and as owner of a company called Take2Seats LLC d/b/a Take2Seats Inc. ( Take2 ). See Stein Aff Respondents admitted that they resold these tickets acquired by its partners and split the profits with Aung, Arking, and their respective companies. See Stein Aff Transaction records and informant testimony show that BHG and its partners Aung, Arking, T&M, and Take 2 each had a history of using fraudulent and illegal practices in purchasing these tickets that BHG resold. See Stein Aff Public records show that T&M and Take2 illegally engaged in their ticket reselling without ever having obtained licenses or having submitted bonds and bi-annual reports to the state. See Stein Aff Additionally, Ticketmaster transaction records and other evidence including informant testimony establishes that Aung, Arking, and their companies used illegal bots and fraudulent practices on BHG s behalf and that Resondents paid for the bots. See Stein Aff OAG s Subpoenas to Respondents 24. As part of that investigation, OAG issued a subpoena duces tecum dated December 2, 2014 to Respondent ticket reseller BHG (the Document Subpoena ), See Stein Aff. 19 & Ex of 10
6 25. The Document Subpoena sought transaction records and communications documenting BHG s reselling activities and relationships with suppliers, customers, and partners. See Stein Aff. Ex The OAG also issued a subpoena ad testificandum dated August 19, 2015 to BHG s owner, Respondent Hakimian, with a return date of September 2, 2015 (the Testimonial Subpoena ). See Stein Aff. 19 & Ex. 8. Deficiencies in BHG s Response to the Subpoenas 27. Although BHG produced certain responsive documents, its production contained gaps and inaccuracies and it improperly withheld records for its transactions after January First, BHG failed to produce responsive records concerning purchase and resale data called for in Requests 7, 8, and 9 of the Documents Subpoena. See Stein Aff a. For the period from 2011 through January 2014, the material BHG produced which came from BHG s own internal sales-tracking software was incomplete due to what BHG has conceded has been inaccurate record-keeping, and OAG sought to compel it to correct these inaccuracies and omissions by producing spreadsheet exports of its resale records in the accounts it maintains with websites through which it resells tickets, including stubhub.com and other ticket resale platforms it has used. See Stein Aff. 35(a)-(g); Reply at 7-9. b. Additionally, BHG failed to produce any records of transactions for the period from February 2015 forward, despite being required to do so under both (1) its continuing obligation to supplement disclosures in response to the Documents Subpoena, and (2) a disclosure requirement in Arts Law even absent any subpoena. See Stein Aff. 35(h), 43-44; Reply at 7-9. BHG waived any objections to such production because it did not timely interpose any written objections thereto, and on May 3, 2016, its counsel represented to OAG 6 6 of 10
7 that BHG intends to produce documents, not just object (although he never made any such production or objection). See Stein Aff Second, BHG refused to produce responsive s and other communications called for in Request No. 10 of the Documents Subpoena, including communications with Arking, Aung, T&M and Take2. See Stein Aff Third, BHG refused to list the credit card and other payment accounts it used to make the purchases at issue in its resale business in response to Request No. 11 of the Documents Subpoena. See Stein Aff Hakimian also refused to comply with the Testimonial Subpoena, without moving to quash it or offering any valid justification for his noncompliance. See Stein Aff Additionally, even after receiving OAG s Document Subpoena in December 2014 which inter alia inquired into BHG s licensing status BHG persisted in reselling tickets without a license, bond, or reports for another year and a half, through July See Stein Aff. 23 & fn.1 Prior Proceedings & BHG s Consent to Producing Some Materials 32. On November 10, 2016, OAG moved by order to show cause for a court order compelling compliance with its subpoenas, which the Court signed on November 14, 2016, and designated Motion Sequence 001. See Index No /2016, Docket Entry Nos Due to an oversight, however OAG was unable to serve the order to show cause by the service deadline and filed for a new order to show cause seeking identical relief, which the Court signed on November 25, 2016, and designated Motion Sequence 002. See Index No /2016, Docket Entry No of 10
8 34. On February 14, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on Motion Sequence 002. During oral argument before Justice Bluth, Respondents counsel confirmed the following: a. Respondent Hakimian agreed to appear to provide testimony in response to the Testimonial Subpoena; b. BHG agreed to produce all communications with Arking, in both his capacity as an employee of BHG and in his capacity as owner and manager of Take2, and all communications with Aung including but not limited to in his capacity as owner and manager of T&M; and c. BHG agreed to produce a list of the credit card and other payment accounts it used to make the purchases at issue in its resale business. d. Respondents continued to object to providing spreadsheet exports of resale records in the accounts BHG maintains on stubhub.com and other resale platforms it has used for reselling tickets; and e. Respondents continued to object to providing records of its ticket resale transactions for February 2015 forward. See Stein Aff In light of these positions by Respondents, OAG at oral argument requested that the Court: a. Order Respondent BHG to produce within a reasonable time the materials it had agreed at oral argument to produce, i.e.: i. All communications with Arking, in both his capacity as an employee of BHG and in his capacity as owner and manager of Take2, and all communications with Aung including but not limited to in his capacity as owner and manager of T&M; 8 8 of 10
9 ii. a list of the credit card and other payment accounts it used to make the purchases at issue in its resale business by a date certain; and b. Order Respondent BHG to produce spreadsheet exports of resale records in the accounts BHG maintains on stubhub.com and other resale platforms it has used for reselling tickets; c. Order Respondent BHG to produce its internal ticket resale records for February 2015 through 2016; and d. Order Respondent Hakimian to comply with the Testimonial Subpoena within a reasonable time after producing documents, so that OAG could question him in a timely fashion after having received such documents. See Stein Aff Respondents have not produced any of the documents or testimony they agreed at oral argument on February 14, 2017 to produce to OAG. See Stein Aff On April 4, 2017, the Court dismissed the proceeding without reaching the merits, on the grounds that OAG had submitted an affirmation in support of its motion but not a petition. See Stein Aff. 54 & Ex On April 28, 2017, OAG moved by order to show cause for a court order compelling compliance with its subpoenas, specifically for the relief outlined in paragraph 53 above, which was designated Motion Sequence 003, providing a petition according to the suggestion in Judge Bluth s Order dated April 4, See Stein Aff On May 1, 2017, Judge Bluth declined to sign OAG s proposed order to show cause from its April 28 filing, on grounds that the case was disposed by Her Honor s Order dated 1 OAG patterned its petition and supporting papers on the petition and papers submitted by the petitioner in one of the cases Judge Bluth cited in her April 4, 2017 Order, i.e., Tullett Prebon Fin. Servs., LLC v. Tradition Asiel Securities, Inc., Sup. Ct., NY County, Index No /2013 (see Stein Aff. Ex. 30). 9 9 of 10
10 April 4, 2017, and that OAG would need to seek relief using a new index number. See Stein Aff. 57 & Ex. 31. AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATORY SUBPOENAS 63(12). 40. OAG has the authority to issue the subpoenas pursuant to Executive Law 41. Executive Law 63(12) does not set forth a procedure through which the Attorney General shall enforce subpoenas he has issued under that statutory provision but does provide that such subpoenas be issued in accordance with the civil practice law and rules. 42. Respondents have failed to comply with the subpoenas. 43. OAG therefore seeks an Order pursuant to CPLR Section 2308(b)(1) enforcing the subpoenas against the Respondents. WHEREFORE, by virtue of the foregoing acts complained of, OAG respectfully requests that an Order be entered instructing Respondents to comply with the Subpoenas within ten (10) days of the issuance of such an Order. Respectfully submitted, Date: May 9, 2017 NOAH STEIN Assistant Attorney General Bureau of Internet & Technology Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 3rd Floor New York, NY of 10
STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. I. INTRODUCTION
1 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, TAYLOR C. KURTH; FINDMYSEATS, LLC; AND BOX OFFICE PROS, LLC, Defendants. NO. I. INTRODUCTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, CASE NO: Plaintiff, v. PRIME RESORTS
More informationCase 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:17-cv-00681-LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RD LEGAL FUNDING, LLC and RD LEGAL FUNDING PARTNERS, LP, Plaintiffs, - against -
More informationCase: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 1:16-cv-00454-WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI PATRICIA WILSON, on behalf of herself and
More informationMatter of RBC Capital Mkts. Corp. v Bittner 2011 NY Slip Op 31231(U) May 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge:
Matter of RBC Capital Mkts. Corp. v Bittner 2011 NY Slip Op 31231(U) May 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 106651/2008 Judge: Michael D. Stallman Republished from New York State Unified
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/2014 0943 AM INDEX NO. 158728/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/08/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of PREFERRED BANK, successor in interest to UNITED INTERNATIONAL BANK, Index No. 150403/2017 Motion Sequence No.
More informationMatter of Monster Beverage Corp. v Schneiderman 2017 NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /14
Matter of Monster Beverage Corp. v Schneiderman 2017 NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158728/14 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2017. Exhibit A
Exhibit A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X FERN A. FISHER, DEPUTY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE FOR NEW YORK CITY COURTS AND
More informationMatter of Rice Sec., LLC v Nevel 2014 NY Slip Op 30487(U) February 26, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Melvin L.
Matter of Rice Sec., LLC v Nevel 2014 NY Slip Op 30487(U) February 26, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 651054/13 Judge: Melvin L. Schweitzer Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationWorth Constr. Co., Inc. v Cassidy Excavating, Inc NY Slip Op 33017(U) January 10, 2014 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 61224/2012
Worth Constr. Co., Inc. v Cassidy Excavating, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 33017(U) January 10, 2014 Sup Ct, Westchester County Docket Number: 61224/2012 Judge: Joan B. Lefkowitz Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationRespondents. Petitioner the People of the State of New York, by Andrew. M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York (petitioner)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 17 -----------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. An Agreement among the Offices of the Attorneys General of the States and
------------------------------------------------------ : : In the Matter of : NFL Ticketing Investigation : : : ------------------------------------------------------ : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT An Agreement
More informationCase 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-00155-VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00155-VAB MARK
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF ACTION
Court File No./N du dossier du greffe: CV-18-00605906-00CP Court File No. Electronically issued Délivré par voie électronique B E T W E E : N: 26-Sep-2018 Toronto ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE STACEY
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH v. CASE NO.: 2018-04653 ISHRAT SONAR, M.D., Respondent. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner Department of Health files this before
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationand upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION
1 1 1 0 1 Plaintiff, by his attorneys, upon personal knowledge as to himself and his own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff
More informationLi Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.
Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 117222/2008E Judge: Paul G. Feinman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationSimpson v Alter 2011 NY Slip Op 31765(U) June 21, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 11095/09 Judge: Thomas P. Phelan Republished from
Simpson v Alter 2011 NY Slip Op 31765(U) June 21, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 11095/09 Judge: Thomas P. Phelan Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationTRI/IAS PART: 22 NASSAU COUNTY
SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK SHORT FORM ORDER Present: HON. TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL Justice Supreme Court -------------------------------------------------------------------1l BETHP AGE FEDERA CREDIT UNION,
More informationWhitnum v Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, P.C NY Slip Op 33856(U) March 7, 2012 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 19222/09
Whitnum v Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, P.C. 2012 NY Slip Op 33856(U) March 7, 2012 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 19222/09 Judge: Joan B. Lefkowitz Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/14/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/14/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/14/2016 02:25 PM INDEX NO. 451962/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/2016 1040 AM INDEX NO. 152848/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ZOE DENISON, Plaintiff, INDEX
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case #: CP Case #: CP
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: ESTATE OF SEYMOUR BAUM Deceased. PROBATE DIVISION ANNEEN NINA GLORIA BAUM, Chief Judge John M. Harris Petitioner/Plaintiff,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/21/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/21/2014 09:14 PM INDEX NO. 162579/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/21/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Conduct of Hearings. All hearings shall be conducted in accordance with these Rules, and any procedures and forms approved by the Board of Directors. 2. Small Claims. All disputes
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/2016 1205 PM INDEX NO. 654752/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: vs. GILDA
More informationCohan v Movtady 2012 NY Slip Op 33256(U) January 24, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 2845/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a
Cohan v Movtady 2012 NY Slip Op 33256(U) January 24, 2012 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 2845/11 Judge: Denise L. Sher Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Sections 24.21 24.29 Last Revised August 14, 2017 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x MARK SAM KOLTA, Petitioner, -against- Index No.: KEITH EDWARD CONDEMI, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationDocket Number: 3916 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIION, SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIION, SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY Thomas J. Madigan, Esquire Ann B. Graff, Esquire VS. LYONS CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC. Christoper R. Opalinski,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL CASE NO. MICHAEL DEWINE 30 East Broad St., 14 th Floor JUDGE Columbus, Ohio 43215 Plaintiff, v. EB RETAIL, LLC
More informationSiegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge:
Siegel v Engel Burman Senior Hous. at E. Meadow, LLC 2010 NY Slip Op 33833(U) October 21, 2010 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 6709/09 Judge: Antonio I. Brandveen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCOMPLIANCE PART V A. HANDLING AND DISPOSITION OF CONSUMER COMPLAINTS 1. DEPARTMENT PHILOSOPHY
PART V COMPLIANCE A. HANDLING AND DISPOSITION OF CONSUMER COMPLAINTS 1. DEPARTMENT PHILOSOPHY The Department and the Division are charged, by law, with the responsibility to investigate and resolve complaints
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 308. Short Title: Admission Ticket Reform Act. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Admission Ticket Reform Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives LaRoque, Guice, Tolson, and Glazier (Primary Sponsors).
More informationBelkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York (Jeffrey L. Goldman of counsel), for respondents-appellants.
Matter of People of the State of N.Y. by Eric T. Schneiderman v Trump Entrepreneur Initiative LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 01430 Decided on March 1, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2016 12:04 PM INDEX NO. 451962/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT In the
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO. 652831/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011 Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York -------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Richard Ralph Feudale, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1905 C.D. 2016 : Argued: June 5, 2017 Department of Environmental : Protection, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Siegel et al v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO IN RE: SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED BY THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCOLLECTING ON A JUDGMENT STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE. Leonard Elias, Esq. Consumer Advocate Miami-Dade Consumer Services Department
1 COLLECTING ON A JUDGMENT STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE Leonard Elias, Esq. Consumer Advocate Miami-Dade Consumer Services Department 1 1 If you are attempting to levy against Debtor s Real Property, follow Steps
More informationMOTION TO QUASH TRIAL SUBPOENA FOR LOEB & TROPER WORK PAPERS. On May 16, 2005, Intervenor-Respondent [ the Respondents ]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER --------------------------------------------X MIRIAM OSBORN MEMORIAL HOME ASSOCIATION, FILED AND ENTERED ON DATE June 30, 2005 WESTCHESTER COUNTY
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) )
Case 1:18-cv-01621 Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FIX THE COURT, 1440 G St. NW, Ste. 800 Washington, DC 20005 Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationTHE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Before: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; Jerry E. Smith, U. S. Circuit Judge; W. Eugene Davis, U. S. Circuit Judge; Jacques
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/30/ :21 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2017. Index No.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF New York PHOTOBUCKET.COM, INC. Index No. [type in Index No] -against- GOOTEN F/K/A/ BREAKOUT COMMERCE INC. Plaintiff(s), Summons Defendant(s). Date Index
More informationGliklad v Cherney 2015 NY Slip Op 31439(U) August 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted
Gliklad v Cherney 2015 NY Slip Op 31439(U) August 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 602335/09 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationDated: Louise Lawyer Attorney for Plaintiff
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Please note: This sample document is redacted from an actual research and writing project we did for a customer some time ago. It reflects the law as of the date we completed it. Because
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2016 10:26 AM INDEX NO. 650074/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016 llsupreme COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK EVENT CARDIO GROUP INC.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) Attorney General CHRIS KOSTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) Division: RAVEN THORNHEART, ) An individual,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY #50 MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
V I R G I N I A: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY CHERI SMITH, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Chancery No. 53360 ) WESLEY C. SMITH, ) Defendant ) #50 MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS A pdf
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK GREEN UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL INCORPORATED Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT Index No. 150536/2017 KEL-MAR INTERIORS, INC., AIRREFCO, CORP.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2017
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2017 0136 PM INDEX NO. 655186/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/10/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationRECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF
SUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. 03SA369 TWO EAST 14TH AVENUE DENVER, COLORADO 80203 RECEIVED ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW JAN 262004 Petitioner: ATTORNEy REGULATION THE
More informationCase 2:14-cv JLR Document 24 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 44 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 2
Case :-cv-0-jlr Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. Plaintiff, INTERNET ORDER LLC also
More informationBEFORE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Denver Board of Water Commissioners ) Amendment Application for ) FERC Project No. 2035-0999 Gross Reservoir Hydroelectric Project ) SAVE THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
David R. Langdon (0067046) Thomas W. Kidd, Jr. (0066359) Bradley M. Peppo (0083847) Trial Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LETOHIOVOTE.ORG 208 East State Street
More informationNational Steel Supply, Inc. v Ideal Steel Supply, Inc NY Slip Op 30176(U) February 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /11
National Steel Supply, Inc. v Ideal Steel Supply, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30176(U) February 6, 2015 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 501154/11 Judge: Karen B. Rothenberg Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationPetitioner Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers ("PRI") in the above-captioned proceeding.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ---------------------------------------------------------------- x PHYSICIANS' RECIPROCAL INSURERS, ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE PROFESSIONS, INC., Petitioner,
More informationMatter of Baumrind v Beddoe 2013 NY Slip Op 30692(U) April 5, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Peter H.
Matter of Baumrind v Beddoe 2013 NY Slip Op 30692(U) April 5, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 103338/12 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL
DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 01/01/13 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor
More informationTHE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of KIKO, Petitioner-Appellant,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/05/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS In the Matter of the Application of PALACE FOODS, LLC, Petitioner, For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR Article 75, Vacating a Final Arbitration Award
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: November 22, 2017 525023 In the Matter of THE PLASTIC SURGERY GROUP, P.C., Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND
More informationSpencer v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 32108(U) April 30, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Kathryn E.
Spencer v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 32108(U) April 30, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 117844/2009 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT
Indiana False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.5 et seq (as amended through P.L. 109-2014) Indiana Medicaid False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act, codified at 5-11-5.7
More informationTITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.
RULE 40. TITLE XIV TRIALS PLACE OF TRIAL (a) Designation of Place of Trial: The petitioner, at the time of filing the petition, shall file a designation of place of trial showing the place at which the
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-24-2009 Joyce Allen Follow
More informationATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM CASE NO.: L-05-3-1121 TO: C/O: MURPHY OIL USA, INC. CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 200 Peach Street 1200 S. Pine Island Road El
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT - 1 -
1 1 1 Plaintiff Marcel Goldman ( Plaintiff ), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, complains and alleges the following: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a class action against The Cheesecake
More informationState of New York v ERW Enter., Inc NY Slip Op 30592(U) April 14, 2015 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Debra A.
State of New York v ERW Enter., Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30592(U) April 14, 2015 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 451462/13 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2016 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 654332/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW COUNTY OF NEW YORK COBY EMPIRE, LLC x - Plaintiff/Petition
More informatione! d, E SUMMONS DANIEL SALOMONE, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT: DANIEL SALOMONE
'r I 7 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK CURRENT MEDICAL DIRECTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, -against- DANIEL SALOMONE, Defendant. Index No. Date of Filing: MarcW-~OOd. SUMMONS TO THE ABOVE-NAMED
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:16-cv-02816-JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JOEL JEROME TUCKER, individually and as an officer
More informationSelvi Singapore Trading PTE Ltd. v Harris Freeman Asia Ltd NY Slip Op 31554(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Selvi Singapore Trading PTE Ltd. v Harris Freeman Asia Ltd. 2016 NY Slip Op 31554(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650782/2016 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationCase 3:17-cv DMS-RBB Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 20
Case :-cv-000-dms-rbb Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 0 Chiharu G. Sekino (SBN 0) SHEPHERD, FINKELMAN, MILLER & SHAH, LLP 0 West A Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Phone: () - Facsimile: () 00- csekino@sfmslaw.com
More informationWells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Richard
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 601680/2009 Judge: Richard B. Lowe III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 1:17-cv PAE Document 6 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:17-cv-07659-PAE Document 6 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BIGFOOT VENTURES LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE CELEBRITY CAFE.COM, LLC, and DOMINICK A.
More informationRobinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. v Basch 2017 NY Slip Op 30166(U) January 26, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. v Basch 217 NY Slip Op 3166(U) January 26, 217 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 161793/215 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2014 INDEX NO. 652899/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ABRAM SABO, v. Plaintiff, ALBERTO
More informationCHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS
Ch. 5 FORMAL PROCEEDINGS 52 CHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS Subch. Sec. A. PLEADINGS AND OTHER PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 5.1 B. HEARINGS... 5.201 C. INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW... 5.301 D. DISCOVERY... 5.321 E. EVIDENCE
More informationDefendants. This is an action for foreclosure of a first lien mortgage encumbering the single
SUPREME COURT: STATE OF NEW YORK TRIAL READY PART WESTCHESTER COUNTY PRESENT: HON. SAM D. WALKER, J.S.C. ---------------------------------------------------------------------X HSBC BANK USA N.A. AS TRUSTEE
More informationNO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff
NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff v. MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS HILDA M. ARMENDARIZ, and MARCELINO ARMENDARIZ, dba APLICACION DE ORO E INFORMACION, Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY
STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PETITIONER, V. CASE NO. ROBERT P. ARSCOTT, LIMIT., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION
MATTHEW A. RICHARDS, SBN mrichards@nixonpeabody.com CHRISTINA E. FLETES, SBN 1 cfletes@nixonpeabody.com NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, th Floor San Francisco, CA 1-00 Tel: --0 Fax: --00 Attorneys
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: (09)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: 04-16032
More informationCOMES NOW Petitioner Department of Health and files this. Administrative Complaint before the Board of Speech-Language Pathology
STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PETITIONER, V. CASE NO. 2010-02056 CLARA ZAMBRANO-CANIZARES, S.L.P., RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW
More informationMatter of Morris v Velickovic 2011 NY Slip Op 30091(U) January 11, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Alice Schlesinger
Matter of Morris v Velickovic 2011 NY Slip Op 30091(U) January 11, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 800032/10 Judge: Alice Schlesinger Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationGarcia v City of New York 2014 NY Slip Op 30364(U) February 10, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2010 Judge: Kathryn E.
Garcia v City of New York 2014 NY Slip Op 30364(U) February 10, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 114295/2010 Judge: Kathryn E. Freed Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationCase 1:13-cv GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-11392-GAO Document 1 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEAH MIRABELLA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Case No. 13-cv-11392
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
DEBRA A. VALENTINE General Counsel GREGG SHAPIRO JEFFREY S. GALVIN GREGORY A. ASHE Federal Trade Commission 6th St. & Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 200 Washington, D.C. 20580 (202) 326-3549 (voice) (202)
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) {1} Before the Court is the Motion of non-party National Western Life Insurance Company
AARP v. Am. Family Prepaid Legal Corp., 2007 NCBC 4 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY AARP, v. Plaintiff, AMERICAN FAMILY PREPAID LEGAL CORPORATION, INC. d/b/a AMERICAN FAMILY LEGAL PLAN; HERITAGE
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-00392 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DARRYL AUSTIN, CASE NO: PLAINTIFF VS. JURY DEMAND JAY
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE. Sam Sloan Petitioner. INDEX No against-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE Sam Sloan Petitioner -against- INDEX No. 2004-7739 Beatriz Marinello, Tim Hanke, Stephen Shutt, Elizabeth Shaughnessy, Randy Bauer, Bill Goichberg,
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018
Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Justice: Law Secretary: Secretary: Part Clerk: Hon. Sharon M.J. Gianelli, J.S.C. Karen L.
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More information