FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
|
|
- Belinda Johnston
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X MORGAN C. STOVER, -against- Plaintiff, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10; and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 10, S U M M O N S Index No.: Date Purchased: Defendants X PLAINTIFF DESIGNATES NEW YORK COUNTY AS PLACE OF TRIAL BASIS OF VENUE IS THE DEFENDANTS PLACES OF BUSINESS YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action by serving your Answer on Plaintiff s attorneys within 20 days after service of this Summons, exclusive of the day of service, or within 30 days after service is complete if this Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York. In case of your failure to Answer or Appear, Judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Dated: Mineola, New York November 4, 2015 PLAINTIFF S ADDRESS: MORGAN C. STOVER 129 Blue Heron Drive Secaucus, NJ DEFENDANTS ADDRESSES: HUDSON S BAY COMPANY 3 Manhattanville Road, Suite 202 Purchase, New York of 33
2 Yours, etc. WEITZPASCALE By: BRIAN C. PASCALE Local Counsel for Plaintiff 221 Mineola Boulevard Mineola, New York Tel: (516) Fax: (516) LAYFIELD & BARRETT, APC STEVEN WEINBERGER Attorneys for Plaintiff 7135 E. Camelback Road, Suite 230 Scottsdale, Arizona Tel: (480) Fax: (480) HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P. 3 Manhattanville Road, Suite 202 Purchase, New York HUDSON S BAY COMPANY /HBC DIGITAL 250 Vesey Street, Floor 22 New York, New York HUDSON S BAY COMPANY /HBC DIGITAL 4 World Financial Center, Floor 22 New York, New York LORD & TAYLOR LLC c/o Corporation Service Company 80 State Street Albany, New York SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC Attn: Corporate Tax Dept. 12 East 49th Street New York, New York SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC c/o Corporation Service Company 80 State Street Albany, New York of 33
3 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X MORGAN C. STOVER, -against- Plaintiff, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10; and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 10, C O M P L A I N T Index No.: Date Purchased: Defendants X Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, by her attorneys, LAYFIELD & BARRETT, APC and WEITZPASCALE, complaining of the Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10; and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 10, respectfully alleges, upon information and belief, the following: PARTIES, JURISDICTIONS AND VENUE 1. At all times relevant herein, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, is a resident of Hudson County, New Jersey, and was a resident of Hudson County, New Jersey at all times relevant to this Complaint. 3 of 33
4 2. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a domestic Corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 3. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a foreign Corporation transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the State of New York. 4. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a domestic Limited Liability Company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 5. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a foreign Limited Liability Company transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 6. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a domestic Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 7. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a foreign Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 8. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 4 of 33
5 9. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York, and has caused events to occur within the County and State of New York that are the subject matter of this Complaint. 10. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a domestic Corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 11. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a foreign Corporation transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the State of New York. 12. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a domestic Limited Liability Company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 13. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a foreign Limited Liability Company transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 14. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a domestic Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 5 of 33
6 15. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a foreign Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 16. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 17. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York, and has caused events to occur within the County and State of New York that are the subject matter of this Complaint. 18. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a domestic Corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 19. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a foreign Corporation transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the State of New York. 20. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a domestic Limited Liability Company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 6 of 33
7 21. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a foreign Limited Liability Company transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 22. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a domestic Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 23. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a foreign Partnership transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 24. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 25. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York, and has caused events to occur within the County and State of New York that are the subject matter of this Complaint. 7 of 33
8 26. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a domestic Corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 27. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a foreign Corporation transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the State of New York. 28. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a domestic Limited Liability Company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 29. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a foreign Limited Liability Company transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 30. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 31. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York, and has caused events to occur within the County and State of New York that are the subject matter of this Complaint. 32. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a domestic Corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of 8 of 33
9 the State of New York. 33. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a foreign Corporation transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the State of New York. 34. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a domestic Limited Liability Company duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of New York. 35. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a foreign Limited Liability Company transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 36. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York. 37. At all times relevant herein, Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, is a Business Enterprise transacting and/or doing and/or conducting and/or soliciting business within the County of New York and State of New York, and has caused events to occur within the County and State of New York that are the subject matter of this Complaint. 38. By reason of the foregoing, Jurisdiction and Venue are proper in New York County. 39. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendants, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, are individuals subject to suit who breached duties to the Plaintiff 9 of 33
10 whose true identities and addresses of residences are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff reserves her right to amend this Complaint when the identities of said Defendants become known. 40. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendants, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, are individuals subject to suit who breached duties to the Plaintiff whose true identities and addresses of residences are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff reserves her right to amend this Complaint when the identities of said Defendants become known. 41. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant, ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10, are corporations, or other public or private entities subject to suit which breached duties to the Plaintiff whose true identities and addresses of residences are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff reserves her right to amend this Complaint when the identities of said Defendants become known. 42. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant, XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 10, are partnerships, or other public or private entities subject to suit which breached duties to the Plaintiff whose true identities are presently unknown to Plaintiff. Plaintiff reserves her right to amend this Complaint when the identities of said Defendants become known. 43. All acts complained of were done by Defendants and/or their authorized agents, servants, and/or employees. 44. All acts complained of were done by Defendants and/or their authorized agents, servants, and/or employees and were performed while in the course and scope 10 of 33
11 of their employment, so that Defendants are legally responsible for their agents, servants, and/or employees acts. 45. Defendants are not entitled to invoke the limited liability provisions of CPLR Article 16 as this lawsuit falls within one or more of the exceptions set forth in Section 1602 of the CPLR. GENERAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 46. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, as a fashion model working in New York City, New York, would occasionally be assigned to Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC., and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, to do full line day shoots. 47. Between the months of May and August, 2015 Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, was assigned to Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, for a full line day shoots. 48. One day in this time frame, the artistic director, an employee of Defendant, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, stated that they wished to take test photographs of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that were separate from the normal photographs taken for the full line photographs. 49. The artistic director explained to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 11 of 33
12 50. The artistic director represented to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 51. The artistic director guaranteed to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 52. The artistic director assured to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 53. The artistic director confirmed to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 54. For the test photographs, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, was dressed in a nude color bra and nude color underwear. 55. The test photographs taken of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, consisted of photos taken of her body. 56. Although, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, was told these photographs were only for test purposes, the photographs were used by Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, as a mannequin on the Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image. 12 of 33
13 57. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, did not obtain, nor do they currently have, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, permission, express or implied, to use the test photographs for such a purpose. 58. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, did not obtain, nor do they currently have, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, consent, express or implied, to use the test photographs for such a purpose. 59. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, have not compensated Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, for the use of her likeness. 60. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, have not compensated Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, for the misappropriation of her likeness. (Intentionally Left Blank) 13 of 33
14 AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS INVASION OF PRIVACY THROUGH MISAPPROPRIATION OF LIKENESS 61. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below. 62. At all relevant times, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, had the right of privacy with regard to the use of her likeness as displayed and portrayed on Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, various retail websites. 63. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC have used Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness without her or her representatives permission, express or implied. 64. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC have used Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness without her or her representatives consent, express or implied. 65. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC have used Plaintiff, 14 of 33
15 MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness without her or her representatives authorization, express or implied. 66. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has the right to consent or to prevent others, including Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, from using her likeness for their personal financial gain. 67. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, was readily identifiable on Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, retail websites, insofar as one who views the mannequin photographs with a naked eye can reasonably determine that the person depicted in the photograph is the same person who is complaining of its unauthorized use. 68. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness was willful, intentional, and knowing and was done for the direct purpose of profiting from and gaining a commercial benefit. 69. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., 15 of 33
16 HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness, Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her. 70. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s conduct was malicious, fraudulent, oppressive and intended to injure Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, and as a consequence thereof Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, is entitled to punitive damages. 71. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars. 72. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT OF PUBLICITY 73. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below. 74. At all relevant times, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, had the sole right of publicity with regard to the use of her likeness as displayed and portrayed on Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & 16 of 33
17 TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, various retail websites. 75. At all relevant times, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, had the exclusive right of publicity with regard to the use of her likeness as displayed and portrayed on Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, various retail websites. 76. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, used Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, image and likeness without her or her representatives permission, express or implied. 77. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, used Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, image and likeness without her or her representatives consent, express or implied. 78. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, used Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, image and likeness without her or her representatives authorization, express or implied. 17 of 33
18 79. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, was readily identifiable on Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, retail websites, insofar as one who views the mannequin photographs with a naked eye can reasonably determine that the person depicted in the photograph is the same person who is complaining of its unauthorized use. 80. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness was willful, intentional, and knowing and was done for the direct purpose of profiting from and gaining a commercial benefit. 81. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s unauthorized and unlawful use of Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness, Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her. 82. Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, conduct was malicious, 18 of 33
19 fraudulent, oppressive and intended to injure Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, and as a consequence thereof Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, is entitled to punitive damages. 83. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars. 84. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS FRAUD 85. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below. 86. At all relevant times during the course of dealing between Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, and Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, Defendants falsely and intentionally misrepresented that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays. 87. At all relevant times during the course of dealing between Defendants and Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, Defendants falsely and intentionally misrepresented, omitted, and suppressed that the true purpose of the photographs was that they were to be used by Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING 19 of 33
20 LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, as a mannequin on the Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image. 88. In representations to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, Defendants purposefully and fraudulently concealed the facts itemized above, including and not limited to, that prior to asking Plaintiff to take the photographs, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, knew, or had reason to know, that the images were to be used as a mannequin on the Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image. 89. In representations to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, Defendants fraudulently concealed the facts itemized above, including and not limited to, that prior to asking Plaintiff to take the photographs, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, knew, or had reason to know, that they were going to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness for the direct purpose of profiting from and gaining a commercial benefit. 90. When the artistic director explained, confirmed, represented, guaranteed, and assured Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that these images would never be used 20 of 33
21 for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, knew, or had reason to know, that those representations were false. 91. When the artistic director explained, confirmed, represented, guaranteed, and assured Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that these images would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, knew, or had reason to know, that those representations were fraudulent. 92. When the artistic director falsely and fraudulently explained, confirmed, represented, guaranteed, and assured Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that these images would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, made those misrepresentations with the intent to induce Plaintiff s reliance upon them. 93. When the artistic director falsely and fraudulently explained, confirmed, represented, guaranteed, and assured Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, that these 21 of 33
22 images would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, made those misrepresentations with the intent to induce Plaintiff to model for the test photographs. 94. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, relied to her detriment on Defendants intentional and fraudulent misrepresentations as set out above. 95. Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, justifiably relied to her detriment on Defendants intentional and fraudulent misrepresentations as set out above. 96. Relying on the misrepresentations of Defendants, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, modelled for the test photographs. 97. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, false and fraudulent misrepresentations to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, about the true purpose of the photographs Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her. 98. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars. 22 of 33
23 99. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD 100. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below At the time Defendants asked Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, to model for the test photographs, Defendants were in a unique position of knowledge concerning the true purpose she was asked to do so, which knowledge was not possessed by Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, and Defendants thereby held a position of superiority over Plaintiff Defendants took unconscionable advantage of its dominant position of knowledge with regard to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, and engaged in constructive fraud in its relationship with Plaintiff Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, reasonably relied on Defendants representations Defendants knew of the true purpose they asked Plaintiff to model for the test photographs, but misrepresented, deceived, and concealed that purpose so that they would not have to compensate Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, and to make a greater profit. 23 of 33
24 105. Based on the foregoing, Defendants made false statements and misrepresentations of fact in order to secure greater profits for themselves Based on the foregoing, Defendants false statements and misrepresentations of fact were made with scienter Based on the foregoing, Defendants false statements and misrepresentations of fact were made with scienter and with an intent that a party would act or refrain from acting in reliance on the misrepresentations Based on the foregoing, Defendants false statements and misrepresentations of fact were made with scienter and with an intent that a party would act or refrain from acting in reliance on the misrepresentations and Plaintiff suffered pecuniary loss as a result of her reliance thereon Defendants conduct, acts, and/or omissions were substantial factors in causing injury to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER As a direct and proximate result of Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, constructive fraud upon Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, about the true purpose of the photographs Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars. 24 of 33
25 112. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION 113. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below Defendants expressly denied that they were going to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays Defendants having undertaken to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness as a mannequin on the Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image, owed a duty to Plaintiff to provide accurate and complete information regarding the true purpose she was asked to model for the test photographs Defendants having undertaken to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays, owed a duty to Plaintiff to provide accurate and complete information regarding the true purpose she was asked to model for the test photographs Defendants having undertaken to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness for the direct purpose of profiting from and gaining a commercial benefit, 25 of 33
26 owed a duty to Plaintiff to provide accurate and complete information regarding the true purpose she was asked to model for the test photographs Defendants representations to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, falsely and deceptively sought to create the image and impression that the test photographs would never be used for commercial purposes, in commercials, advertisements, promotional material, or website displays Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, purposefully concealed the facts itemized above, including, but not limited to, their intent to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness as a mannequin on the Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, purposefully concealed the facts itemized above, including, but not limited to, their intent to use Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness for the direct purpose of profiting from her image and likeness and gaining a commercial benefit therefrom Defendants, through their misrepresentations, deceived Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, as to their intent to use her likeness as a mannequin on the 26 of 33
27 Defendants websites, to allow customers to see how clothing for sale would look on them by viewing it on her image Defendants, through their misrepresentations, deceived Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, as to their intent to use her likeness for the direct purpose of profiting from and gaining a commercial benefit therefrom Defendants engaged in all the acts and omissions described above with the intent that Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, would innocently rely on the misrepresentation, deception, and concealment in deciding to model for the test photographs Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, relied to her detriment on Defendants intentional and fraudulent misrepresentations as set out above Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, justifiably relied to her detriment on Defendants intentional and fraudulent misrepresentations as set out above This reliance proximately caused the injuries and damages to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER As a direct and proximate result of Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC s, intentional misrepresentations to Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, about the true purpose of the photographs, Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her. 27 of 33
28 128. Defendants conduct, acts, and/or omissions were substantial factors in causing injury to the Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS UNJUST ENRICHMENT 131. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below As the intended and expected result of its conscious wrongdoing, Defendants have profited and benefited from Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER s, likeness Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, have voluntarily accepted and retained these profits and benefits, derived from Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, with full knowledge and awareness that, as a result of Defendants conscious and intentional wrongdoing, Plaintiff was not compensated at all for her modelling for the test photographs. 28 of 33
29 134. As a direct result of the foregoing acts, omissions, conscious wrongdoing, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, fraud, constructive fraud, and/or unjust enrichment of Defendants, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, Plaintiff suffered harm, including but not limited to damage to her reputation and denial of the benefit of the rights of publicity which belong to her By virtue of the conscious wrongdoing alleged above, Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, have been unjustly enriched at the expense of the Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, who is entitled to in equity, and hereby seeks, the disgorgement and restitution of Defendants wrongful profits, revenues and benefits, to the extent and in the amount deemed appropriate by this Honorable Court or jury; and such other relief as this Honorable Court or jury deems just and proper to remedy Defendants unjust enrichment By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount in excess of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000.00) Dollars By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, has been damaged in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York. (Intentionally Left Blank) 29 of 33
30 AS AND FOR A SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS PUNITIVE DAMAGES 138. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates, and realleges each and every allegation contained in the preceding paragraphs as though fully set forth below The malicious and intentional acts by Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, were so egregious and reckless as to entitle Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, to an award of Punitive Damages against Defendants. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, MORGAN C. STOVER, requests judgment against Defendants, HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, and/or SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC as follows: in the FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having 30 of 33
31 jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; in the SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION in an amount which exceeds the monetary limits of all courts having jurisdiction save the Supreme Court of the State of New York; together with interest, legal fees, costs, and disbursements of this action, and for such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper. Dated: Mineola, New York November 4, 2016 Yours, etc. WEITZPASCALE By: BRIAN C. PASCALE Local Counsel for Plaintiff 221 Mineola Boulevard Mineola, New York Tel: (516) Fax: (516) LAYFIELD & BARRETT, APC STEVEN WEINBERGER Attorneys for Plaintiff 7135 E. Camelback Road, Suite 230 Scottsdale, Arizona Tel: (480) Fax: (480) of 33
32 VERIFICATION BRIAN C. PASCALE, an attorney duly admitted to practice law before the courts of the State of New York, hereby affirms the truth of the following under the penalties of perjury: Affirmant is local counsel to the Plaintiff in the within action. Affirmant has read the foregoing SUMMONS & COMPLAINT and knows the contents thereof. The same is true of Affirmant s own knowledge, except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters, Affirmant believes them to be true. This verification is made by Affirmant and not by the Plaintiff as Plaintiff does not reside within Nassau County, the county where Affirmant s office is located. The grounds of Affirmant s belief as to all matters not stated upon Affirmant s knowledge are as follows: records, reports, documents, papers, conversations with the attorneys for Plaintiff, conversations with the client concerning the within matter, etc. Dated: Mineola, New York November 4, 2016 BRIAN C. PASCALE 32 of 33
33 Index No.: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MORGAN C. STOVER, Plaintiff, -against- HUDSON S BAY COMPANY, HUDSON S BAY TRADING COMPANY, L.P. d/b/a HBTC, L.P., HUDSON S BAY COMPANY/HBC DIGITAL, LORD & TAYLOR LLC, SAKS FIFTH AVENUE LLC, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10; and XYZ PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants. SUMMONS & COMPLAINT WEITZPASCALE Local Counsel for Plaintiff 221 Mineola Boulevard Mineola, New York Tel: (516) LAYFIELD & BARRETT, APC Attorneys for Plaintiff 7135 E. Camelback Road, Suite 230 Scottsdale, Arizona Tel: (480) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 22 N.Y.C.R.R a BRIAN C. PASCALE hereby certifies that, pursuant to 22 N.Y.C.R.R a, the foregoing SUMMONS & COMPLAINT is not frivolous, nor frivolously presented. Dated: Mineola, New York November 4, 2016 BRIAN C. PASCALE WEITZPASCALE Local Counsel for Plaintiff 33 of 33
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/2016 10:52 AM INDEX NO. 154973/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 10:56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO. 651899/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 168 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X PRIME HOMES LLC, Plaintiff Index No.: 151308l2016 -against- Verified Answer
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 190293/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X VINCENT ASCIONE, v. ALCOA,
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND
More informationFILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016
FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2016 04:14 AM INDEX NO. 150318/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2016 02:54 PM INDEX NO. 190047/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X NORMAN DOIRON AND ELAINE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X PAUL KRUG, v. Plaintiff, NICHOLAS J. STONE and JONATHAN KRIEGER, Individually,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/26/2013 INDEX NO. 156836/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/26/2013 CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTION ------------------------------------------------------------x Index
More informationFILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014
FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 09/19/2014 03:42 PM INDEX NO. 810780/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/19/2014 STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF ERIE WILL FOODS, LLC 1 07 5 William Street Buffalo,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/2014 INDEX NO. 650412/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2011 INDEX NO. 652831/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2011 Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York -------------------------------------------------
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ /30/ :11 03:00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 05:11 03:00 PM INDEX NO. 507018/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 2:13-cv KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00248-KOB Document 1 Filed 02/05/13 Page 1 of 14 FILED 2013 Feb-05 PM 12:07 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationCase 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Michael K. Friedland (SBN, michael.friedland@knobbe.com Lauren Keller Katzenellenbogen (SBN,0 lauren.katzenellenbogen@knobbe.com Ali S. Razai (SBN,
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/30/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2015
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/30/2015 02:11 PM INDEX NO. 508062/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/08/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/08/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X NATIONAL AUDITING SERVICES CONSULTING, LLC, Index No.: 650670/16 -against- Plaintiff,
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/2014 09:48 PM INDEX NO. 508086/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS MICHAEL KRAMER, Plaintiff, -against-
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/ /09/ :37 12:27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/25/2016 06/09/2017 12:37 12:27 PM INDEX NO. 508697/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/25/2016 06/09/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERIFIED REPLY TO 89 BOWERY AND HUA YANG'S COUNTERCLAIMS IN VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWER Index No. 150738/2017 Plaintiff, 93 BOWERY HOLDINGS LLC ("93
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. REGISTERED AGENT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2017 05:08 PM INDEX NO. 650263/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2017! SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/ :43 PM
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/09/2015 12:43 PM INDEX NO. 24282/2013E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 37 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -X CARL MILES, Index No.: 24282/2013E
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Brent H. Blakely (SBN bblakely@blakelylawgroup.com Cindy Chan (SBN cchan@blakelylawgroup.com BLAKELY LAW GROUP Parkview Avenue, Suite 0 Manhattan
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/2015 12:05 PM INDEX NO. 651388/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO. 650457/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DAS COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Plaintiff,
More informationSummons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-05069 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/09/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BARTOSZ GRABOWSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationDENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI
CAUSE NO. C-0166-17-H DENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI Defendants. HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL
More informationCourthouse News Service
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 6/15/2009 4:12 PM CV-2009-900370.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA MAGARIA HAMNER BOBO, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA JACK MEADOWS, on behalf
More informationCase 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1
Case 1:18-cv-10927-NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1 FOLKMAN LAW OFFICES, P.C. By: Benjamin Folkman, Esquire Paul C. Jensen, Jr., Esquire 1949 Berlin Road, Suite 100 Cherry Hill,
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48 TH STREET CAPITAL, INC., INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS OP EQUITIES, LLC AND
More informationFILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 06/12/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2015
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2015 12:54 PM INDEX NO. 603813/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ---------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
T SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â FELITA LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of L.M., FELITA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/06/2016 04:59 PM INDEX NO. 655826/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/18/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/18/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------X CATHERINE SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, - against - THIRD-PARTY SUMMONS Index No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Kenneth J. Montgomery, Esq. (KJM-8622) KENNETH J. MONTGOMERY, PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 451 Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.403.9261 Telephone 718.403.9593 Facsimile UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE 1716-CV12857 Case Type Code: TI Sharon K. Martin, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 Michael L. Schrag (SBN: ) mls@classlawgroup.com Andre M. Mura (SBN: ) amm@classlawgroup.com Steve A. Lopez (SBN: 000) sal@classlawgroup.com GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 2:33-av-00001 Document 4385 Filed 10/29/2008 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SHANNON BATY, on behalf of herself and : Case No.: all others similarly situated, : :
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION WHEEL PROS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, WHEELS OUTLET, INC., ABDUL NAIM, AND DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. Electronically
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS
JOAQUIN F. BADIAS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS LEASING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/2013 INDEX NO. 652945/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/21/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/2014 02:37 PM INDEX NO. 160251/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationCase 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23
Case :-cv-0-sk Document Filed 0// Page of James R. Patterson, CA Bar No. Allison H. Goddard, CA Bar No. Elizabeth A. Mitchell CA Bar No. PATTERSON LAW GROUP 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, CA Telephone:
More informationCase 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-00-blf Document Filed /0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: ()
More informationSUPREME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COLJNTY OF NEW YORK 'I'HE TOPPS COMPANY, INC..
NED ON 211712012 T 1 SUPREME COIJRT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COLJNTY OF NEW YORK - against - Plaintiff, 'I'HE TOPPS COMPANY, INC.. SUMMONS Plaintiff designates NEW YORK TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT: YOU
More informationCase: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15
Case: 1:16-cv-00454-WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI PATRICIA WILSON, on behalf of herself and
More informationCase 9:11-cv KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case :-cv-0-kam Document Entered on FLSD Docket 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES AND JESSICA JEFFERYS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/ :34 AM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/03/2014 09:34 AM INDEX NO. 151547/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/03/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MILERVA SANTOS, Index No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:18-cv-13902-GCS-APP ECF No. 1 filed 12/14/18 PageID.1 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JARED ALLEN Plaintiff, v. Case No. JEFF MORTON PAIN
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/ :13 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/02/2016 11:13 AM INDEX NO. 157868/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/02/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 8:18-cv JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41
r Case 8:18-cv-01125-JVS-DFM Document 1-5 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:41 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jamin S. Soderstrom, Bar No. 261054 SODERSTROM LAW PC 3 Park Plaza, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92614 Tel:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 03:49 PM INDEX NO. 190202/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/09/ /28/ :01 01:26 AM PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2016
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 08/09/2016 04/28/2017 11:01 01:26 AM PM INDEX NO. 709310/2016 700645/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2016 04/28/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x Index No.: 655023/2016 DAWN JONES, DDS and EXCLUSIVE DENTAL STUDIOS, PLLC. d/b/a
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO. 654351/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 C:\Documents and Settings\Delia\My Documents\Pleadings\Steiner Studios adv. NY Studios and Eponymous
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015. Exhibit A
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2015 11:42 AM INDEX NO. 158552/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 67 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2015 Exhibit A FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/18/2013 INDEX NO. 158552/2013 NYSCEF DOC.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO. 107442/2010... NYSCEF DON 61712010 DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2010 -against- Plaintiff@), LIFE FTTNESS, A DIVISION OF BRUNSWICK CORPORATION and
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:17-cv-04831-WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POWER PLAY 1 LLC, and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, NORFOLK
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 Todd M. Friedman () Adrian R. Bacon (0) Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. 0 Oxnard St., Suite 0 Woodland Hills, CA Phone: -- Fax: --0 tfriedman@toddflaw.com
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:17-cv-07647-WHP Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X Civil Action No. JAMES WHITELEY, COMPLAINT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
Case :-cv-000 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Frontier Law Center Robert Starr (0) Adam Rose (00) Manny Starr () 0 Calabasas Road, Suite Calabasas, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - E-Mail: robert@frontierlawcenter.com
More information2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
2:14-cv-01400-RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 Civil Action No. WILMA DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationDEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/15/2016 11:34 AM INDEX NO. 154310/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x KRISHNA DEBYSINGH, -against-
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: GLUCK LAW FIRM P.C. Jeffrey S. Gluck (SBN 0) N. Kings Road # Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone:.. ERIKSON LAW GROUP David Alden Erikson (SBN ) Antoinette
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :42 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 158248/2016 MADONNA RAMP, Plaintiff, THIRD-PARTY SUMMONS HYATT
More informationFILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 12/14/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/14/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU... ------X Index No. PRACTICE PROVIDER CORPORATION, Date of Purchase: Plaintiff, SUMMONS - against - Plaintiff designates Nassau County as the place
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0) rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN ) sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0) bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2018
/FILED: NWR1WORIrO1QQ05WITHICLERE (0f8t/1Nh2WC/ 09 ± 50 ANj INDEX NO. 157407/2017 NYSCEF DocCQtøNT1Y OF NEW YORK RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2017 MARIA E. DIAZ,. Plaintiff designates New York County as the
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/26/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2015E
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2016 02:59 PM INDEX NO. 20208/2015E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED IFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2015 04:10 pij INDEXNYSCEF: NO. 27059/2015E 02/26/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
More information1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
1:15-cv-01511-JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Robert K. Besley, Jr., on behalf of himself ) and
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION ARNOLD E. WEBB JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Case No.: Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/31/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/31/2014 02:45 PM INDEX NO. 162875/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/31/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DEBORAH J. DRUCKER, Index
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Case 114-cv-08406-VSB Document 40 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, IOD INCORPORATED
More informationAttorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL CENTER
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SOUTH
More informationU NITED STATES DISTRICT C OURT tor the
Case 1:12-cv-00992-RWS Document 1 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 7 J\0 440 (Rev. 12/09 Summons in a Civil Action Chelsea Elliot and Jeanne Mansfield P/ainriff v. The City of New York, New York Police Department,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/2016 1205 PM INDEX NO. 654752/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )
ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA 912345 Telephone: (949 123-4567 Facsimile: (949 123-4567 Email: attorney@law.com ATTORNEY, Attorney for P1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 07/16/2014 INDEX NO /2013E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/16/2014
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 07/16/2014 INDEX NO. 23643/2013E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/16/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationPlaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Bonnie U. Pittman, individually and as C.A. NO: 2016-CP-23-00945 Trustee of the Dorothy F. King Living
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MINKA LIGHTING, INC., V. PLAINTIFF, WIND RIVER CEILING FANS LLC, SUMMER WIND INTERNATIONAL LLC, AND MONTE HALL, DEFENDANTS.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
BUTLER, aden & JACKSON, P.e. SOUTIi TH AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 01 TELEPHONE: () -00 FAX: () -00 TODD JACKSON ASBIPCC 0 rjacksgyri'..livh..\ \\,C U,\f Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/30/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/30/2016 11:20 AM INDEX NO. 654560/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUNSHINE DIAMONDS LLC, SHINE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 EXHIBIT 2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2016 04:59 PM INDEX NO. 653169/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 EXHIBIT 2 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/29/2016 02:33 PMl NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 INDEX
More information$700,000 against defendants Monadnock Construction Inc. (hereinafter "Monadnock"),
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2015 12:34 PM INDEX NO. 651547/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016. Exhibit D {N
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/2016 12:49 PM INDEX NO. 504403/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016 Exhibit D {N0194821.1 } SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS x THE BOARD
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/ :53 PM
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/09/2015 03:53 PM INDEX NO. 158764/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/09/2015 Exhibit B to the Affirmation of Howard I. Elman, Esq. in Support of Defendants Motion
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-01860 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKHAIL ABRAMOV, individually ) and on behalf
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/12/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 21 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/12/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X X Index No.: 158809/2016 ELIZABETH STORELLI, Plaintiff, -against- AMENDED SUMMONS
More information