FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017"

Transcription

1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION UNION PLAN, AND EFCO PRODUCTS PROFIT SHARING/401(K) PLAN, Index. No. Petitioners, AFFIRMATION OF - against - BARRY R. LAX JEANNE H. SELMER, Respondent X I, BARRY R. LAX, an attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York, affirm the following under the penalty of perjury, pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ( CPLR ) section 2106: 1. I am an attorney admitted to practice within the State of New York and am a partner at Lax & Neville, LLP, attorneys for Petitioners, the EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, the EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan, and the EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan (collectively, the EFCO Plans or Petitioners ). As such, I am fully familiar with the facts set forth herein. 2. The EFCO Plans are claimants in an arbitration currently pending before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA) Dispute Resolution, EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, et al. v. C.L. King & Associates, Inc. & Candace King Weir, FINRA No , and proceeding in New York, at the FINRA New York Office, One Liberty Plaza, 165 Broadway, 27 th Floor, New York, NY (the Arbitration ). 3. On June 13, 2017, Petitioners filed a Petition, along with a supporting 1 of 28

2 Memorandum of Law and an Affidavit, for an Order to Show Cause in Aid of Arbitration compelling Joseph V. Lotano to comply with a Subpoena Ad Testificandum and Duces Tecum that was executed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ( FINRA ) on September 19, See EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, et al. v. Joseph V. Lotano, Index No /2017. The Petition arose out of the previously referenced Arbitration. Mr. Lotano was an independent contractor for CL King. The Court issued an Order to Show Cause on June 22, 2017 setting a hearing date and requiring service of Petitioners papers and any answering papers by dates certain. Before the hearing, the parties stipulated to withdraw the Order because Mr. Lotano agreed to appear voluntarily to provide testimony in the underlying Arbitration. On July 13, 2017, finding that the relief requested was resolved by stipulation, the Court denied the petition as moot and dismissed the proceeding. 4. I submit this Affirmation in support of the EFCO Plans second Petition for an Order pursuant to CPLR section 2308(b) compelling another individual and a former employee of CL King, Jeanne H. Selmer ( Ms. Selmer ), to comply with a Subpoena Ad Testificandum that arises out of the same Arbitration and that was executed by FINRA on June 26, 2017 (the Subpoena ). 5. An arbitration hearing in the underlying Arbitration has already begun, with hearing dates held on: July 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 31, 2017, and August 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, Future hearing dates are currently scheduled for November 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 2017; December 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 2017; February 12, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 2018; and April 3, 5, 16, 18, 19, 20, 2018 (all dates collectively, Arbitration Hearing ). 6. On or around June 26, 2017, Petitioners counsel spoke to Ms. Selmer via telephone and informed her that the Petitioners intended to call her to testify as a witness in the 2 2 of 28

3 Arbitration, and asked her if she would testify voluntarily. Ms. Selmer declined to testify voluntarily. She also said that she did not wish to speak to Petitioners counsel further and indicated she was not represented by counsel. 7. As a result of the call, Petitioners filed a Letter Motion on June 26, 2017, pursuant to FINRA Code 12512(b), with the Director of FINRA Dispute Resolution and the FINRA Arbitration Panel Chair, Daniel Robbins, requesting the issuance of a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Ms. Selmer commanding her to appear as a witness at the Arbitration Hearing. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Petitioners Letter Motion. 8. On June 26, 2017, that same day, respondents in the Arbitration, CL King and Weir, indicated they did not object to Petitioners Letter Motion for the issuance of a subpoena, but indicated that Ms. Selmer had not been a CL King employee for many years and, therefore, they did not have control over her appearance. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Ms. Selmer, signed by the FINRA Arbitration Panel Chair, Daniel Robbins, dated June 26, Attached hereto as Exhibit C are true and correct copies of FINRA s Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes, Sections 12212, 12511, and For the Court s comparison, also attached are true and correct copies of FINRA s Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes, Section 13212, 13511, and Ms. Selmer was an employee and Senior Compliance Examiner with C.L. King, and a Registered Options Principal under FINRA, during the time that Petitioners were customers of CL King. Ms. Selmer signed the Petitioners new account documents on behalf of CL King as the CLKA Principal on the Company Retirement Account Master Account 3 3 of 28

4 Application and as the CLKA Options Principal on the Options Account Approval Form. 12. Petitioners engaged in substantial, good faith efforts to serve Ms. Selmer with the Subpoena, to notify her of her obligation to comply, and to advise her that, if she failed to comply, Petitioners would be forced to institute court proceedings against her to enforce her compliance. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit D are true and correct copies of (i) a letter dated June 27, 2017 from counsel for Petitioners to Ms. Selmer, attaching the Subpoena Ad Testificandum; (ii) an Affidavit of Service, stating that both the letter and the Subpoena had been served on Ms. Selmer on July 10, 2017; and (iii) an Affidavit of Mailing, stating that both the letter and the Subpoena had been mailed to Ms. Selmer via Regular First Class Mail on July 10, The letter requested that Ms. Selmer immediately contact Petitioners counsel to discuss her testimony at the upcoming Arbitration Hearing. The letter cautioned Ms. Selmer that, if she failed to contact Petitioners counsel, they would be forced to institute court proceedings against her. 14. After the Arbitration Hearing had begun, the undersigned asked CL King and Weir s counsel whether they represented Ms. Selmer in connection with the Subpoena. Respondents counsel indicated that they would contact Ms. Selmer to inquire about her willingness to appear and testify voluntarily at the Arbitration Hearing. Respondents counsel later informed the undersigned that they were unable to reach Ms. Selmer and that they, therefore, do not represent her. 15. To date, Ms. Selmer has failed to respond to the Subpoena Ad Testificandum 1 Service was sought via nail and mail. Per the Affidavit of Service, the process server called upon Ms. Selmer at her last known address without success on June 30, as well as on July 5, 8, and 10. Accordingly, the process server affixed a copy of the Subpoena and letter to the door at the address provided and mailed it to the same address via regular first class mail. 4 4 of 28

5 regarding her testimony at the upcoming Arbitration Hearing. 16. Because the FINRA Code does not have any mechanism for enforcement of the Subpoena against a non-party, such as Ms. Selmer, Petitioners respectfully request that this Court issue an Order to enforce Ms. Selmer s compliance with the Subpoena. Dated: New York, New York September 8, 2017 LAX & NEVILLE LLP /s/ Barry R. Lax Barry R. Lax, Esq. Sandra P. Lahens, Esq. Robert R. Miller, Esq Broadway, 35 th Floor New York, NY Tel: (212) Attorneys for Petitioners 5 5 of 28

6 EXHIBIT A 6 of 28

7 June 26, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Daniel Robbins Panel Chair FINRA Dispute Resolution One Liberty Plaza 165 Broadway, 27 th Floor New York, NY Richard W. Berry c/o Northeast Processing Center EVP & Director of FINRA Dispute Resolution Re: EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, the EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan and EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan v. CL King & Associates, Inc. and Candace Weir FINRA Case No Dear Chairman Robbins and Mr. Berry: Claimants respectfully submit this Motion for the Issuance of a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Jeanne H. Selmer pursuant to FINRA Rule 12512, requesting that the Arbitration Panel direct her appearance at the arbitration hearing. Pursuant to FINRA Rule 12512(b), this Motion is being filed with the Director of FINRA Dispute Resolution and the Chair. Claimants provided Respondents counsel with a copy of the attached subpoena and counsel does not object to it. Ms. Selmer was registered with CL King during the time Claimants were customers of the firm and has direct knowledge of the conduct alleged in the Statement of Claim. Ms. Selmer signed the Claimants new account documents, including the Company Retirement Account Master Account Application as CLKA Principal and the Options Account Approval Form as the CLKA Options Principal. She therefore reviewed and approved Claimants CL King retirement and pension accounts. She was also a Registered Options Principal during that time and a Senior Compliance Examiner at the firm. That she has knowledge relevant to Claimants claims, including suitability and supervision, is beyond dispute. 7 of 28

8 Daniel Robbins June 26, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Claimants respectfully request that the Chair issue the attached Subpoena directing Ms. Selmer to appear at the hearing. Thank you. Very truly yours, /s/ Sandra P. Lahens Sandra P. Lahens, Esq. cc: Christopher F. Robertson, Esq., counsel for Respondent (via ) Richard A. Roth, Esq., counsel for Respondent (via ) 8 of 28

9 EXHIBIT A 9 of 28

10 IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FINRA DISPUTE RESOLUTION, INC X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION UNION PLAN, AND EFCO PRODUCTS PROFIT SHARING/401(K) PLAN, - against - Claimants, FINRA Case No CL KING & ASSOCIATES, INC. and CANDACE WEIR, Respondents X SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM To: Jeanne H. Selmer 47 Hudson River Rd. Waterford, NY YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes, CPLR 7505 and 9 U.S.C. 7 to give in-person testimony in a hearing of the above-captioned matter at: FINRA Dispute Resolution One Liberty Plaza 165 Broadway, 27 th Floor New York, NY On July 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 31, 2017, August 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2017; November 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 2017, December 18, 19, 20, 21, 2017, January 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 2018, and any and all dates this hearing is thereafter scheduled, on the part of EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan, and EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan, Claimants in the above-entitled matter. Dated: New York, New York June, 2017 ORDERED BY: Daniel Robbins, Panel Chair 1 10 of 28

11 EXHIBIT B 11 of 28

12 IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FINRA DISPUTE RESOLUTION, INC X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION UNION PLAN, AND EFCO PRODUCTS PROFIT SHARING/401(K) PLAN, - against - Claimants, FINRA Case No CL KING & ASSOCIATES, INC. and CANDACE WEIR, Respondents X SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM To: Jeanne H. Selmer 47 Hudson River Rd. Waterford, NY YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes, CPLR 7505 and 9 U.S.C. 7 to give in-person testimony in a hearing of the above-captioned matter at: FINRA Dispute Resolution One Liberty Plaza 165 Broadway, 27 th Floor New York, NY On July 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 31, 2017, August 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2017; November 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 2017, December 18, 19, 20, 21, 2017, January 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 2018, and any and all dates this hearing is thereafter scheduled, on the part of EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan, and EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan, Claimants in the above-entitled matter. Dated: New York, New York June, 2017 ORDERED BY: Daniel Robbins, Panel Chair 1 12 of 28

13 EXHIBIT C 13 of 28

14 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 1 Print Sanctions (a) The panel may sanction a party for failure to comply with any provision in the Code, or any order of the panel or single arbitrator authorized to act on behalf of the panel. Unless prohibited by applicable law, sanctions may include, but are not limited to: Assessing monetary penalties payable to one or more parties; Precluding a party from presenting evidence; Making an adverse inference against a party; Assessing postponement and/or forum fees; and Assessing attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. (b) The panel may initiate a disciplinary referral at the conclusion of an arbitration. (c) The panel may dismiss a claim, defense or arbitration with prejudice as a sanction for material and intentional failure to comply with an order of the panel if prior warnings or sanctions have proven ineffective. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 16, Selected Notice: 07-07, of /12/2017

15 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 1 Print Discovery Sanctions (a) Failure to cooperate in the exchange of documents and information as required under the Code may result in sanctions. The panel may issue sanctions against any party in accordance with Rule 12212(a) for: Failing to comply with the discovery provisions of the Code, unless the panel determines that there is substantial justification for the failure to comply; or Frivolously objecting to the production of requested documents or information. (b) The panel may dismiss a claim, defense or proceeding with prejudice in accordance with Rule 12212(c) for intentional and material failure to comply with a discovery order of the panel if prior warnings or sanctions have proven ineffective. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 16, Selected Notice: 07-07, of /12/2017

16 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 2 Print Subpoenas (a) To the fullest extent possible, parties should produce documents and make witnesses available to each other without the use of subpoenas. (1) Arbitrators shall have the authority to issue subpoenas for the production of documents or the appearance of witnesses. (2) Unless circumstances dictate the need for a subpoena, arbitrators shall not issue subpoenas to non-party FINRA members and/or employees or associated persons of non-party FINRA members at the request of FINRA members and/or employees or associated persons of FINRA members. If the arbitrators determine that the request for the appearance of witnesses or the production of documents should be granted, the arbitrators should order the appearance of such persons or the production of documents from such persons or non-party FINRA members under Rule (b) A party may make a written motion requesting that an arbitrator issue a subpoena to a party or a non-party. The motion must include a draft subpoena and must be filed with the Director. The requesting party must serve the motion and draft subpoena on each other party. The requesting party may not serve the motion or draft subpoena on a non-party. (c) If a party receiving a motion and draft subpoena objects to the scope or propriety of the subpoena, that party shall, within 10 calendar days of service of the motion, file written objections with the Director, and shall serve copies on all other parties. The party that requested the subpoena may respond to the objections within 10 calendar days of receipt of the objections. After considering all objections, the arbitrator responsible for deciding discoveryrelated motions shall rule promptly on the issuance and scope of the subpoena. (d) If the arbitrator issues a subpoena, the party that requested the subpoena must serve the subpoena on all parties and, if applicable, on any non-party receiving the subpoena. The party must serve the subpoena on the non-party by first-class mail, overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. 16 of /12/2017

17 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 2 (e) If a non-party receiving a subpoena objects to the scope or propriety of the subpoena, the non-party may, within 10 calendar days of service of the subpoena, file written objections with the Director. The non-party may file the objection by first-class mail, overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. The Director shall forward a copy of the written objections to the arbitrator and all other parties. The party that requested the subpoena may respond to the objections within 10 calendar days of receipt of the objections. The party must serve the response on the non-party and file proof of service with the Director pursuant to Rule 12300(c)(5). After considering all objections, the arbitrator responsible for issuing the subpoena shall rule promptly on the objections. (f) Any party that receives documents in response to a subpoena served on a non-party shall serve notice on all other parties within five days of receipt of the documents. Thereafter, any party may request copies of such documents and, if such a request is made, the documents must be provided within 10 calendar days following receipt of the request by serving them by first-class mail, overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. Parties must not file the documents with the Director. (g) If the arbitrators issue a subpoena to a non-party FINRA member and/or any employee or associated person of a non-party FINRA member at the request of a FINRA member and/or employee or associated person of a FINRA member, the party requesting the subpoena shall pay the reasonable costs of the non-party's appearance and/or production, unless the panel directs otherwise. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. April 3, Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Feb. 18, Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 2, Selected Notices: 07-07, 07-13, 08-57, 13-04, of /12/2017

18 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 1 Print Sanctions (a) The panel may sanction a party for failure to comply with any provision in the Code, or any order of the panel or single arbitrator authorized to act on behalf of the panel. Unless prohibited by applicable law, sanctions may include, but are not limited to: Assessing monetary penalties payable to one or more parties; Precluding a party from presenting evidence; Making an adverse inference against a party; Assessing postponement and/or forum fees; and Assessing attorneys' fees, costs and expenses. (b) The panel may initiate a disciplinary referral at the conclusion of an arbitration. (c) The panel may dismiss a claim, defense or arbitration with prejudice as a sanction for material and intentional failure to comply with an order of the panel if prior warnings or sanctions have proven ineffective. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 16, Selected Notice: 07-07, of /12/2017

19 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 1 Print Discovery Sanctions (a) Failure to cooperate in the exchange of documents and information as required under the Code may result in sanctions. The panel may issue sanctions against any party in accordance with Rule 13212(a) for: Failing to comply with the discovery provisions of the Code, unless the panel determines that there is substantial justification for the failure to comply; or Frivolously objecting to the production of requested documents or information. (b) The panel may dismiss a claim, defense or proceeding with prejudice in accordance with Rule 13212(c) for intentional and material failure to comply with a discovery order of the panel if prior warnings or sanctions have proven ineffective. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 16, Selected Notice: 07-07, of /12/2017

20 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 2 Print Subpoenas (a) To the fullest extent possible, parties should produce documents and make witnesses available to each other without the use of subpoenas. (1) Arbitrators shall have the authority to issue subpoenas for the production of documents or the appearance of witnesses. (2) Unless circumstances dictate the need for a subpoena, arbitrators shall not issue subpoenas to non-party FINRA members and/or employees or associated persons of non-party FINRA members at the request of FINRA members and/or employees or associated persons of FINRA members. If the arbitrators determine that the request for the appearance of witnesses or the production of documents should be granted, the arbitrators should order the appearance of such persons or the production of documents from such persons or non-party FINRA members under Rule (b) A party may make a written motion requesting that an arbitrator issue a subpoena to a party or a non-party. The motion must include a draft subpoena and must be filed with the Director. The requesting party must serve the motion and draft subpoena on each other party. The requesting party may not serve the motion or draft subpoena on a non-party. (c) If a party receiving a motion and draft subpoena objects to the scope or propriety of the subpoena, that party shall, within 10 calendar days of service of the motion, file written objections with the Director, and shall serve copies on all other parties. The party that requested the subpoena may respond to the objections within 10 calendar days of receipt of the objections. After considering all objections, the arbitrator responsible for deciding discoveryrelated motions shall rule promptly on the issuance and scope of the subpoena. (d) If the arbitrator issues a subpoena, the party that requested the subpoena must serve the subpoena on all parties and, if applicable, on any non-party receiving the subpoena. The party must serve the subpoena on the non-party by first-class mail, overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. 20 of /12/2017

21 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :24 AM INDEX Page NO /2017 of 2 (e) If a non-party receiving a subpoena objects to the scope or propriety of the subpoena, the non-party may, within 10 calendar days of service of the subpoena, file written objections with the Director. The non-party may file the objection by first-class mail overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. The Director shall forward a copy of the written objections to the arbitrator and all other parties. The party that requested the subpoena may respond to the objections within 10 calendar days of receipt of the objections. The party must serve the response on the non-party and file proof of service with the Director pursuant to Rule 13300(c)(4). After considering all objections, the arbitrator responsible for issuing the subpoena shall rule promptly on the objections. (f) Any party that receives documents in response to a subpoena served on a non-party shall serve notice on all other parties within five days of receipt of the documents. Thereafter, any party may request copies of such documents and, if such a request is made, the documents must be provided within 10 calendar days following receipt of the request by serving them by first-class mail, overnight mail service, overnight delivery service, hand delivery, or facsimile. Parties must not file the documents with the Director. (g) If the arbitrators issue a subpoena to a non-party FINRA member and/or any employee or associated person of a non-party FINRA member at the request of a FINRA member and/or employee or associated person of a FINRA member, the party requesting the subpoena shall pay the reasonable costs of the non-party's appearance and/or production, unless the panel directs otherwise. Amended by SR-FINRA eff. April 3, Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Feb. 18, Amended by SR-FINRA eff. Dec. 15, Adopted by SR-NASD eff. April 2, Selected Notices: 07-07, 07-13, 08-57, 13-04, of /12/2017

22 EXHIBIT D 22 of 28

23 June 27, 2017 VIA PERSONAL SERVICE Jeanne H. Selmer 47 Hudson River Rd. Waterford, NY Re: EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, the EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan and EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan v. CL King & Associates, Inc. and Candace Weir FINRA Case No Dear Ms. Selmer: This firm represents Claimants in the above-referenced matter. Enclosed please find a Subpoena Ad Testificandum executed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Panel Chairperson, Daniel Robbins. The Subpoena directs your appearance at the impending arbitration hearing dates: July 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 31, 2017, August 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2017; November 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 2017, December 18, 19, 20, 21, 2017, January 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 2018, and all days this hearing is scheduled thereafter. Please contact our office immediately to discuss the date of your appearance. Given that the arbitration hearing is fast-approaching, we will be forced to institute court proceedings against you to enforce your compliance with the Subpoena if you do not contact us by Thursday, July 6, of 28

24 Jeanne H. Selmer June 27, 2017 Page 2 of 2 We thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation. questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (212) Should you have any Thank you. Very truly yours, /s/ Sandra P. Lahens Sandra P. Lahens, Esq. cc: Christopher F. Robertson, Esq., counsel for Respondent (via ) Richard A. Roth, Esq., counsel for Respondent (via ) 24 of 28

25 EXHIBIT A 25 of 28

26 IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FINRA DISPUTE RESOLUTION, INC X EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION NON-UNION PLAN, EFCO PRODUCTS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION UNION PLAN, AND EFCO PRODUCTS PROFIT SHARING/401(K) PLAN, - against - Claimants, FINRA Case No CL KING & ASSOCIATES, INC. and CANDACE WEIR, Respondents X SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM To: Jeanne H. Selmer 47 Hudson River Rd. Waterford, NY YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED pursuant to of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes, CPLR 7505 and 9 U.S.C. 7 to give in-person testimony in a hearing of the above-captioned matter at: FINRA Dispute Resolution One Liberty Plaza 165 Broadway, 27 th Floor New York, NY On July 11, 12, 18, 19, 20, 24, 26, 31, 2017, August 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 2017; November 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 21, 2017, December 18, 19, 20, 21, 2017, January 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26, 2018, and any and all dates this hearing is thereafter scheduled, on the part of EFCO Products Defined Contribution Non-Union Plan, EFCO Products Defined Contribution Union Plan, and EFCO Products Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan, Claimants in the above-entitled matter. Dated: New York, New York June, 2017 ORDERED BY: Daniel Robbins, Panel Chair 1 26 of 28

27 27 of 28

28 28 of 28

NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES

NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES NASD CODE OF ARBITRATION PROCEDURE FOR INDUSTRY DISPUTES As of September 10, 2008 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Interpretive Material, Definitions, Organization, and Authority IM-13000. Failure to Act Under

More information

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant Nicholas Brine Finn Case Number: 17-01277 vs. Respondent Hearing Site: New York, New York Credit Suisse Securities

More information

Regulatory Notice 13-04

Regulatory Notice 13-04 Regulatory Notice 13-04 Subpoenas and Orders to Appear or Produce Documents SEC Approves Amendments to Arbitration Codes Relating to Subpoenas and Orders to Direct the Appearance of Witnesses and Production

More information

At Part of the Supreme Court of the. of New York, at the Courthouse thereof, 60 PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS.

At Part of the Supreme Court of the. of New York, at the Courthouse thereof, 60 PLAINTIFF, DEFENDANTS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING IS TO PUNISH JAMES GIBSON, SR. FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR REFUSING OR NEGLECTING TO OBEY A SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM AND AD TESTIFICANDUM AND APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION, AND SUCH PUNISHMENT

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 155 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 155 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2017 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/13/2017 08:25 PM INDE NO. 650440/2012 v. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO CPLR 3126 MOTION MADE BY: RETURN DATE, TIME and PLACE: SUPPORTING PAPERS: RELIEF REQUESTED:

More information

Investigations and Enforcement

Investigations and Enforcement Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :26 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/23/2016 10:26 AM INDEX NO. 650074/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016 llsupreme COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK EVENT CARDIO GROUP INC.

More information

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3

Case 1:17-cv LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3 Case 1:17-cv-00681-LAP Document 1 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RD LEGAL FUNDING, LLC and RD LEGAL FUNDING PARTNERS, LP, Plaintiffs, - against -

More information

PART 24. MANDATORY ARBITRATION

PART 24. MANDATORY ARBITRATION PART 24. MANDATORY ARBITRATION (a Supervising Judge for Arbitration. The chief judge shall appoint in each county of the circuit having a mandatory arbitration program, a judge to act as supervising judge

More information

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution

More information

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES 400. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES 401. THE CHIEF REGULATORY OFFICER 402. BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE 402.A. Jurisdiction and General Provisions 402.B. Sanctions 402.C. Emergency Actions

More information

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers

More information

The court annexed arbitration program.

The court annexed arbitration program. NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court

More information

Investigations and Enforcement

Investigations and Enforcement Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Sections 24.21 24.29 Last Revised August 14, 2017 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor

More information

11.00 MANDATORY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS GOVERNED BY ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES

11.00 MANDATORY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS GOVERNED BY ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES ARTICLE 11: MANDATORY ARBITRATION 11.00 MANDATORY ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS GOVERNED BY ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES (a) The Mandatory Arbitration Program in the Circuit Court for the Sixteenth Judicial

More information

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association ARBITRATION RULES 1. Conduct of Hearings. All hearings shall be conducted in accordance with these Rules, and any procedures and forms approved by the Board of Directors. 2. Small Claims. All disputes

More information

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC

Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution. Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic Securities Company, LLC Award FINRA Office of Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant Christopher Herridge Rusk Case Number: 16-03411 vs. Respondent Hearing Site: New York, New York First Republic

More information

CHAPTER 03 - HEARINGS DIVISION SECTION HEARING PROCEDURES

CHAPTER 03 - HEARINGS DIVISION SECTION HEARING PROCEDURES CHAPTER 03 - HEARINGS DIVISION SECTION.0100 - HEARING PROCEDURES 26 NCAC 03.0101 GENERAL (a) The Rules of Civil Procedure as contained in G.S. 1A-1 and the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and

More information

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES

Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES Minnesota No-Fault, Comprehensive or Collisions Damage Automobile Insurance Arbitration RULES Amended and Effective August 5, 2003 Rule 1. Purpose and Administration a. b. c. The purpose of the Minnesota

More information

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned

Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, Counterclaim-Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Plaintiffs, Index No. 651989/2010 Assigned to: Barbara Jaffe, J.S.C. Part 12 BDC FINANCE, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. STIPULATION CONSENTING TO

More information

THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FEE DISPUTE COMMITTEE RULES FOR PROCESSING AND CONDUCT OF FEE DISPUTE

THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FEE DISPUTE COMMITTEE RULES FOR PROCESSING AND CONDUCT OF FEE DISPUTE THE WASHINGTON COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FEE DISPUTE COMMITTEE RULES FOR PROCESSING AND CONDUCT OF FEE DISPUTE 1. Agreement of Parties: These Rules shall apply whenever both of the parties have agreed to

More information

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter

More information

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regulate civil discovery procedures in the state. Florida does not require supplementary responses to

More information

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding

More information

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the

More information

May 7, Dear Ms. England:

May 7, Dear Ms. England: May 7, 1999 Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Mail Stop 10-1 Re: File No. SR-NASD-99-08

More information

August 7, Re: File No. SR-NASD Dear Ms. England:

August 7, Re: File No. SR-NASD Dear Ms. England: August 7, 1998 Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Mail Stop 10-1 Re: File No. SR-NASD-98-58

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF LOS ANGELES. June 20, 2007 PERSONNEL DIRECTIVE NO.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF LOS ANGELES. June 20, 2007 PERSONNEL DIRECTIVE NO. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT MANUAL Personnel Directive Subject: ACCEPTANCE OF SUBPOENAS AND SUMMONSES ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF LOS ANGELES June 20, 2007 PERSONNEL DIRECTIVE

More information

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require

More information

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS.

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS. *(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3468) Old Docket Number: 3520 A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION Robert A. Mulle,

More information

Claimant, Defendant. Section 20-a of the Court of Claims Act, and the claim alleges that claimant suffered loss of liberty,

Claimant, Defendant. Section 20-a of the Court of Claims Act, and the claim alleges that claimant suffered loss of liberty, THE STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF CLAIMS KAREEM BELLAMY, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Claimant, Defendant. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND DISCONTINUANCE Claim No. 120902 Marin, J. WHEREAS, the parties

More information

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS OSB Rules of Procedure (Revised 1/1/2018) 1 Rules of Procedure (As approved by the Supreme Court by order dated February 9, 1984 and as amended by Supreme Court orders dated April 18, 1984, May 31, 1984,

More information

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT 1920 Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT PART IV. COURT OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE [207 PA. CODE CH. 3] Amendment to Rules Relating to Initiation of Formal Changes; Doc. No. 1 JD 94 Per Curiam: Order And Now, this

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :01 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :01 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- ----------------- X GENESIS REOC COMPANY, LLC, JAZZ REAL TY II, LLC, individually and on behalf of, GENESIS

More information

Form CC-1512 MEMORANDUM FOR MECHANIC S LIEN Form CC-1512 CLAIMED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR UNDER VIRGINIA CODE 43-5

Form CC-1512 MEMORANDUM FOR MECHANIC S LIEN Form CC-1512 CLAIMED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR UNDER VIRGINIA CODE 43-5 1. Copies Using This Revisable PDF Form a. Original to court to be recorded. b. One copy mailed to the owner of the property upon which the lien is placed. c. Additional copies as dictated by local practice.

More information

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. A. Motion to Quash Assignment Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena. Recently you prepared a subpoena. Look at the front of the subpoena where it tells you how to oppose a subpoena.

More information

May 21, By Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC

May 21, By  Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC May 21, 2012 By Email (pubcom@finra.org) Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1506 Re: FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-18, Request for Comment on

More information

January 2018 RULES OF THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION

January 2018 RULES OF THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION January 2018 RULES OF THE ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois One Prudential Plaza 130 East Randolph Drive,

More information

RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Definitions. As used in these rules: (A) Arbitration means a process whereby a neutral third person, called an arbitrator, considers

More information

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING SUBPOENAS AND SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING SUBPOENAS AND SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM CITY OF BERKELEY RENT STABILIZATION BOARD INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING SUBPOENAS AND SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM A subpoena is an order that is issued to require the attendance of a witness to testify

More information

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions

Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions If you have a case pending at the unemployment compensation Appeals Office, you will need to request discovery from your former employer Discovery

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/05/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/05/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS In the Matter of the Application of PALACE FOODS, LLC, Petitioner, For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR Article 75, Vacating a Final Arbitration Award

More information

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

Case 3:15-cv GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION Case 3:15-cv-00681-GNS Document 1 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION VAUGHAN SCOTT, Movant, VS. Civil Action No. 15-cv-

More information

(1) The Amendment modifies the proposed Rule 2130(b) as follows (new language underlined):

(1) The Amendment modifies the proposed Rule 2130(b) as follows (new language underlined): January 28, 2003 Ms. Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-1001 Re: File No. SR-NASD-2002-168-

More information

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative

More information

CONTINUANCE POLICY IN BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES IN DISTRICT COURT AND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CALENDARING CIVIL CASES

CONTINUANCE POLICY IN BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES IN DISTRICT COURT AND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CALENDARING CIVIL CASES STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 23 RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE CONTINUANCE POLICY IN BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES IN DISTRICT COURT AND CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CALENDARING CIVIL CASES Rule 2(a)

More information

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND GENERAL IAS PART COURTROOM 242 60 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 PHONE: 646-386-3265 FAX: 212-374-0452 Law

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING

More information

Labor Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Labor Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 480-1-4 HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 480-1-4-.01 Repealed 480-1-4-.02 Authority Of A Hearing Officer 480-1-4-.03 Duties And Disqualifications

More information

Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012

Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012 Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012 20 West Street Boston, MA 02111-1218 TELEPHONE (617) 338-0500 FAX (617) 338-0550

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124 CHAPTER FIVE FAMILY DIVISION RULES...124 5.1 APPLICABILITY OF RULES; SANCTIONS...124 (a) Applicability of Rules...124 (b) Sanctions...124 5.2 MATTERS ASSIGNED TO FAMILY LAW DIVISION; COVER SHEET...124

More information

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 JUDICATE WEST COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES RULE 1. INTENT AND OVERVIEW 1 RULE 1.A. INTENT 1 RULE 1.B. COMMITMENT TO EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 1 RULE 2. JURISDICTION 1 RULE

More information

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Unites States v. Pokerstars, et al Doc. 100 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 6,z UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOC# (oo -against- Plaintiff, MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

More information

Case KJC Doc 2904 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11 : : : : : : : : :

Case KJC Doc 2904 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11 : : : : : : : : : Case 11-13511-KJC Doc 2904 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ------------------------------------------------------- x In re FILENE S BASEMENT,

More information

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 13985 STOWE DRIVE POWAY, CA 92064 TEL: (858) 513-1020 FAX: (858) 513-1002 www.lorberlaw.com May 6, 2016 Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield jgreenfield@lorberlaw.com Zachariah R. Tomlin

More information

HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC

HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC HOROWITZ LAW GROUP PLLC 61 Broadway, Ste. 2125 New York, NY 10006 Telephone: (212) 920-4503 Facsimile: (646) 918-1474 www.horowitzpllc.com Email: jhorowitz@horowitzpllc.com Direct Dial: (212) 920-4503

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PIMA COUNTY ORDER AMENDING RULE 8 LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PIMA COUNTY ORDER AMENDING RULE 8 LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FILED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PIMA COUNTY FEB 2 6 2009 RACHELLE M. RESNICK CLERK SUPREME COURT BY 09-0014 ORDER AMENDING RULE 8 LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

More information

PART I CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation Interpretation 4

PART I CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation Interpretation 4 DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE PROCEEDINGS RULES* (Issued September 1986; revised September 2004 (name changed); further revised September 2006) Rule PART I Page CITATION AND INTERPRETATION 1. Citation. 4 2. Interpretation

More information

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012) COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012) JUDGE THOMAS R. MULROY 2207 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 Case Coordinator: Margaret Murphy 312-603-6058 STANDING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/2016 02:29 PM INDEX NO. 155226/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 150 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL BRANCH -----------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures

1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures 1. Intent OCERS Board Policy The Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System ( OCERS ) specifically intends that this policy shall apply to and shall govern in each administrative

More information

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PETITION AND MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO CPLR 7511 NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------x MARK SAM KOLTA, Petitioner, -against- Index No.: KEITH EDWARD CONDEMI, Respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/28/2016 01:04 PM INDEX NO. 810002/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X STEVEN C. HORN, Plaintiff,

More information

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

Consolidated Arbitration Rules Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their

More information

LED. the right to request a proceeding in accordance with sections and , Florida. Docketed by

LED. the right to request a proceeding in accordance with sections and , Florida. Docketed by LED JUN 19 2018 Docketed by CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER JIMMY PATRON IS STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Petitioner, Case No.: 211297-17 -AG v. CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Respondent. ORDER OF REVOCATION

More information

RULES OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT GOVERNING COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDICIAL OFFICERS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 351 et. seq. Preface to the Rules

RULES OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT GOVERNING COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDICIAL OFFICERS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 351 et. seq. Preface to the Rules RULES OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT GOVERNING COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUDICIAL OFFICERS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 351 et. seq. Preface to the Rules Section 351 et. seq. of Title 28 of the United States

More information

(c) Real Estate Tax Assessment Appeals Petition shall be formatted and contain the following :

(c) Real Estate Tax Assessment Appeals Petition shall be formatted and contain the following : RULE L5000 REAL ESTATE TAX ASSESSMENT APPEALS. (a Except as otherwise provided in this section, the procedure in an appeal from a tax assessment determination shall be in accordance with the rules relating

More information

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF CLAIMS Board of Claims Act Board of Claims Rules of Procedure (Printed August 1, 2001) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Page Board of Claims Act 2 Board of Claims

More information

File No. SR-NASD

File No. SR-NASD November 18, 2002 Ms. Katherine A. England Assistant Director Division of Market Regulation Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549-1001 Re: File No. SR-NASD-2002-168-

More information

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2015

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2015 FILED NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2015 0444 PM INDEX NO. 604419/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/31/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:17-cv GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:17-cv-00178-GAM Document 56 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOPHER WALTER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

Daniel L. Alterman Arlene F. Boop. resolution. attorneys and. attorneys time. TRAUB. By: ARLENE F. BOOP. By: DORIS G.

Daniel L. Alterman Arlene F. Boop. resolution. attorneys and. attorneys time. TRAUB. By: ARLENE F. BOOP. By: DORIS G. Alterman & Boop LLP 99 Hudson Street, 8 th Floor New York, NY 10013 212-226-2800 Daniel L. Alterman Arlene F. Boop March 5, 2019 Opt-In Class Members of Gallimore v. United States Dear Opt-in Class Member:

More information

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, 2003 Table of Contents PART I Administrative Rules for Procedures for Preliminary Sunrise Review Assessments Part

More information

IVAMS Administrative and Arbitration Rules (Amended September 22, 2015) IVAMS Administrative Rules

IVAMS Administrative and Arbitration Rules (Amended September 22, 2015) IVAMS Administrative Rules IVAMS ARBITRATION & MEDIATION SERVICES Corporate Offices: 8287 White Oak Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tel: (909) 466-1665 Fax: (909) 466-1796 E-mail: info@ivams.com www.ivams.com IVAMS Administrative

More information

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No. BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

More information

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION USAGE NOTE: Following our preliminary hearing, I commonly enter a scheduling order of this sort in all AAA-administered arbitrations. A similar form is used in NASD-administered arbitrations and in private

More information

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2018 STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF NEW YORK 17' 221 W. 17 STREET, LLC, vs. Plaintiff, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT ALLIED WORLD SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE Index No.: 655144/17 COMPANY, Defendant. David B.

More information

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration (A) Cases for arbitration (1) Any judge of the general division of the Court of Common Pleas may at the case management conference or thereafter order and schedule, by entry,

More information

Docket Number: * (Consolidated with Docket Nos. 3520, 3628 & 3629) * A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Docket Number: * (Consolidated with Docket Nos. 3520, 3628 & 3629) * A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. Docket Number: 3468 * (Consolidated with Docket Nos. 3520, 3628 & 3629) * A.G. CULLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. William D. Clifford, Esquire Richard D. Kalson, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM

More information

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Subchapter 1

More information

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting.

Attached is the Award in Wachovia Securities v. Brucker, Case no for discussion in the Employment Break-Out Section at the Annual Meeting. MALECKI LAw 11 BROADWAY, SUITE 715 NEW YORK NEW YORK 10004 (212) 943-1233 TELEPHONE (212) 943-1238 FACSIMILE }ENICE L. MALECKI AsSOCIATE JULIE K, MATHEW Notes, Expungement & Good Faith and Fair Dealing:

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 110 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/12/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 110 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X Index No.: 805071/2016 JEANNETTE SWEAT, -against- Plaintiff, NOTICE OF MOTION ELIAS KASSPIDIS, M.D. and LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, Defendants. -------------------------------------

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/24/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/24/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2018 SUl)REME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------- -----------X 88 THIRD REALTY, LLC, Index No.153632/2016 Plaintiff, -against- AFFIRMATION

More information

FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator Training. Motions to Dismiss Training Module Release Date August 2010 (Rule Effective Date February 23, 2009)

FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator Training. Motions to Dismiss Training Module Release Date August 2010 (Rule Effective Date February 23, 2009) FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator Training Motions to Dismiss Training Module Release Date August 2010 (Rule Effective Date February 23, 2009) Introduction to Motions to Dismiss In this training module

More information

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration The purpose of the San Gabriel Valley Lawyer Referral Service Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program is to resolve fee disputes between clients and attorneys. Clients and

More information

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5 Baykeeper v. Zanker Road Resource Management, Ltd Doc. 0 Case:-cv-0-HRL Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Jason Flanders (Bar No. 00) Andrea Kopecky (Bar No. ) SAN FRANCISCO, INC. Market Street, Suite 0 San

More information

Case 2:12-md AB Document Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

Case 2:12-md AB Document Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER Case 2:12-md-02323-AB Document 10294 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS' CONCUSSION INJURY LITIGATION

More information

mg Doc 8303 Filed 03/13/15 Entered 03/13/15 16:14:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 23

mg Doc 8303 Filed 03/13/15 Entered 03/13/15 16:14:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 23 Pg 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------- ) In re: ) Case No. 12-12020 (MG) ) RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al.,

More information

Regulatory Notice 18-33

Regulatory Notice 18-33 Regulatory Notice 18-33 Prehearing Conference Late Cancellation Fee and Arbitrator Honorarium SEC Approves Amendments to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure to Establish a Per-Arbitrator Fee and Honorarium

More information

Rule 1. Scope These rules apply to all cases in which a petition is filed alleging that a juvenile is abused, neglected and/or dependent.

Rule 1. Scope These rules apply to all cases in which a petition is filed alleging that a juvenile is abused, neglected and/or dependent. Rules for Juvenile Court Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Gates, Pasquotank and Perquimans Counties (Rule 14 regarding Pre-Adjudication Conferences will be effective June 1, 2010 for Camden, Chowan, Currituck,

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â â â â -- â â â â â â X DAVID WILLIAMS, Index No.: 507787/2016

More information

RULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR

RULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR RULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR AMENDED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GENERAL RULES...1 1. Goal...1 2. Administration

More information

GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES

GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES All persons named as respondents in a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have the right to a hearing. The purpose

More information

ORDER. AND NOW, May 5, 2005, it is hereby ordered and decreed that all Perry County

ORDER. AND NOW, May 5, 2005, it is hereby ordered and decreed that all Perry County IN RE: REPEAL AND ADOPTION:IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PERRY COUNTY RULES :OF THE 41ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CIVIL PROCEDURES :OF PENNSYLVANIA :PERRY COUNTY BRANCH :NO. ORDER AND NOW, May 5, 2005, it

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2016 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 513727/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JUDY E. HINDS, as Executor of the Estate of EARL

More information