ryffitrtrffit No lEG-lV/ Sty-l 14l Loose Dated :

Transcription

1 To ryffitrtrffit ( O /t Joi*tt S e,c,refra,ry / Se,r1ttrz*t ( A a.y,*en IV ),? afial^a1 ) 1. All GM's/ Er. in-chief's/ CE's in PSPCL & PSTCL. 2. All Dy. CE's/ SE's/ in PSPCL & PSTCL. 3. All Addl. SE's/ Sr^ Xen's (Civil) in PSPCL & PSTCL 4. All AE's/ AEE's/ Civil in PSPCL, PSTCL, BBMB & PSERC, Chandigarh. Memo No. I ll lg hrors I eclvl CCt 123 Dated: l= Subject: Re-revised tentative seniority list of AE/ Civil to & AEE/ Civil for the period to A list of expected changes likely to come in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil for the period to & in the tentative seniority list of AE/ Civil for the period 01"09.11 to was circulated vide this office Memo No.4540/4639/EG- V/ Sty Loose Dated: 27, Further the revised tentative seniority list of AE/ Civit for the period to was circulated vide this office Memo No /EG-!V/ Sty-134/ vol.-4 Dated: The revised seniority list of AEE/ Civil for the period for the period to was circulated vide this office Memo No lEG-lV/ Sty-l 14l Loose Dated : The above mentioned lists were circulated for the information of the concerned quarters and to for file their objections, if any. ln the mean while Er. Gurpreet Singh Chadha (Code No ) (AEE/ Civil) filed the Civil Writ petition No of 2016 in the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. The Hon'ble court on dated passed the following decision:- Without going into the facts of the case or expressing any opinion on the rights of the petitioner, on all available pleas, at least this much appears to be certain that in the process of finalizing the seniority list the material consideration would be the dates of occurrence of vacancies pre & post 2004 within the separate quota [AMIE] but since the factual position is not forthcoming in the petition nor does it reflect in Annexure P-9 which is crucial to the determination and of the principle to be adopted in making the tentative list final, the post-vacancy position since December, 1991 (date with respect to the petitioner) till 2nd July, 2004 and thereafter will become the governing principle in finalizing the seniority list qua the petitioner and others. Therefore, it is expected that before the seniority list is finalized, the vacancy position based upon the running roster of vacancies will be published by circulation among all those persons likely to be affected, including the petitioner, so that they can make effective representation pointing out their eligibility and rights of consideration from the perspective of the running vacancies and as they were filled from time to time. Consequently, the petitioner and others, who are likely to be affected, would have a valuable right to represent the Committee set up for the purpose of their points of view after they are supplied the date of occurrence of vacanciesl posts in the Cadres concerned pre & post 2nd July, 2004 and accordingly their objections would need to be noticed, considered and dealt with before issuance of the final seniority list. lt is also expected that the Committee in PSPCL would implement the order dated 22nd November, 2012 in its correct perspective in relation to its binding ratio. lt follows that if any time limits for receiving objections run out to accommodate the process of supply of vacancy position as above observed and effective hearing they will be extended accordingly. However, nothing said in this order would influence the independent decision which the PSPCL may take and will be read in guidance of observing the principles of naturaljustice for arriving at a fair decision made in accordance with aw..." ln compliance of the above order passed by the Hon'ble court, the vacancy position based on running roaster of vacancies of AE/ Civil under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10.6 (Unamended), were circulated by this office vide Memo No / dated

2 - 2_* ln further compliance of the directions given by the Hon,ble court, all the affected persons including the petitioner were called for personal hearing before the committee (on dated rc, & ).The committee submitted its report' which is attached with this letter as Annexure-l. Accordingly, the list of expected changes likely to come in the final seniority list of AE/ civil for the period 01'04'05 to 31^08'11 & in the tentative seniority list of AE/ civil for the period 01.0g.11 to 31'12'12 circulated vide this office Memo tto. +s+o/463g/ec-lv/ sty- l14tloose Dated: 27'11'2015 & revised seniority list of AEE/ civil forthe period forthe period a1.or.02to 30'04'15 circulated vide this office Memo No. 466s/ 4t64tE}-tvi sty-114t Loose Dated: 27'11'2015 are hereby withdrawn and the Re-revised seniority lists of AEtcivil & AEE/ civil up to the period are hereby circurated for the information of concerned officers' These seniority lists are without prejudice to the outcome of cwp No" 4575 of 2013 titled as sh. Manjinder singh & oirrers v/s pspcl & another,s and cwp No' of 2a15 titled as sh.i']ardeep Singh Bhandari V/s pspcl & others As per the instructions issued by the office of ce/ HRD (Joint secretary/ services-l) vide their office Memo No. lo4zi 1141 dated 21.0g.2016, these seniority lists will not be circulated by post and will be uploaded at the departmental website ffi#:::rsubhead/linkof',senio,itylisuservices.1,,ofthehead/link All the HoD's are hereby requested to get this noted from the concerned officers, who are working under their luiisoiction. ln case any officer has objection to these seniority lists, then he/ she may represent to this office through proper channel with relevant documents as a proof, within the period of Two month from the date of issue of this letter. lf objections are not received within the stipulated period then these seniority rists shall be declared as final with the following conditions that._ 1' These seniority Lists are without prejudice to the outcome of cwp. No oj 2013 titled as sh. Manjindei singh & others vls pspcl & another,s and cwp No' of 2015 titled as sh. Pardeep singh Bhandari v/s PSPCL & others and other court cases, if any pending in various courts in this regard and the decision of such court cases shail be appricabre. 2' lf any of the officer atlotted deemed date of promotion above the junior officer' then his/ her seniority may be revised/ refixed as per the deemed date order. D.A./ As above These seniority lists are issued with the approvat of competent Authority. -$- Jt. Secy.IServices-1, Endst. No:- l:-orl lq= / EG-rv/ cct 123 Dated:-, =,,r.?8ifr PfrP A copy ot the above along with seniority list is fonruarded to the foilowing ror'irorfi ti#ana necessary action please._ ' 2' secretary/ Punjab state Electricity T:qqrtory commission, s.c.o. No , sector-34 A, chandigarh; secrelaryl ge[ia, sector-tg, chandigarh. 3. OSD (T) to CMD, pspcl/ PSTC^L, patiata; SE (Il to_director, pspcl/ PSTCL, Patiala; Director/personnet, pspcll psicllprtiala; Dy. Secy./Joint Secretaries lrllfl Patiara; Dv. secv. to chairman/ sr. ps's to rvremoiiii s""v., pspcl, 4- AM/ HR/ supdt./ Gazetted section 1, 2, 3,5 & 6, pspcl, patiara. Jt. secy.r $/""-r, psppl, patiata uv

3 Subject: S ffistrtrl -3- ""4" ",ex."*."- L" Ilegd. of;fice: PSEI] Head o.f/ic'e lluilding,'fhe Mall, patiala-fu7001 Corporate Id e ntity No. U4 0 I 09 P B 2 0! 0 S GC I I 3, we hs ite : wruntts n cl. i n Minu,tes of meeting CWP No of 2016 filed by Sh. Gurpreet Singh Chadha V/s PSPCL & others. The Subject cited Civil Er.Gurpreet Singh Chadha (Code Haryana High Court, Chandigarh. passed the following decision:- mm Writ Petitron No of 2016 was filed by No ) (AEE/ Civi!) in the Punjab & Tlie Hon'ble Court on dated Without going into the facts of the case or expressing any opinion on the rights of the petitioner, on all available pleas, at least this much appears to be certain that in the process of finalizing the seniority list the material consideration would be the dates of occurrence of vacancies pre & post 2OO4 within the separate quota [AMIE] but since the factual position is not forthcoming in the petition nor does it reflect in Annexure P-9 which is crucial to the determination and of the principle to be adopted in making the tentative list final, the post-vacancy position since December, 1991 (date with respect to the petitioner) till 2nd July,2004 and thereafter will become the governing principle in finalizing the seniority list qua the petitioner and others, Therefore, it is expected that before the seniority list is finalized, the vacancy position based upon the running roster of vacancies will be published by circulation among all those persons likely to be affected, including the petitioner, so that they can make effective representation pointing out their eligibility and rights of consideration from the perspective of the running vacancies and as they were filled from time to time. Consequently, the petitioner and others, who are likely to be affected, would have a valuable right to represent the Committee set up for the purpose of their points of view after they are supplied the date of occurrence of vacancies/ posts in the Cadres concerned pre & post 2nd July, 2004 and accordingly their objections would need to be noticed, considered and dealt with before issuance of the final seniority list. lt is also expected that the Committee in PSPCL would implement the order dated 22nd November,2012 in its correct perspective in relation to its binding ratio. lt follows that if any time limits for receiving objections run out to accommodate the process of supply of vacancy position as above observed and effective hearing they will be extended accordingly. However, nothing said in this order would influence the independent decision which the PSPCL may take and will be read in guidance of observing the principles of natural justice for arriving at a fair decision made in accordance with law. With these observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of." ln compliance of the above order passed by the Hon'ble court, the vacancy position based on running roaster of vacancies of AE/ Civil under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10.6 (Unamended), were circulated by the office of Joint Secy./ Services-, PSPCL, Patiala vide his office Memo No / dated 07.A w, \g1ta" Y+ Page i"\ (-i 7 of37

4 -4- ln further compliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court, all the concerned officials/ officers, including the petitioner are requested to appear before the committee on dated , & The officers as per Annexure-A, appeared before the committee to represent their case. Before their objections are considered & dealt with, it will be appropriate to discuss the brief history of the case which is as under:- Brief Facts of the Whole Case:- That on the request of Association of junior engineers/ Civil, Memorandum No. 17lEB-409l Loose dated was put up before the full Board for clubbing of promotion quota under Regulation 10.4 and 10.6 of PSEB Services of Engineer (Civil) Regulation, 1965 and formation of amended Regulation The PSEB in its meeting 06/ 97 held on at Chandigarh approved the above proposal. Accordingly, the Regulation 10.4 (unamended) & Regulation 10.6 (unamended) of PSEB Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation-1965 were clubbed vide Office Order No. 405 dated and new regulation 10.4 (amended) was formed. The unamended Regulation (10.4) & (10.6) and amended Regulation 10.4 are as under:- Regulation 10.4 (Unamended):- " 9%o of the cadre posf of Assistant Engineer/ Civil shall be reserved for departmental employees (Technical, Subordinafes & Drawing staff), who while in the service of Board have qualified Secfion A & B of AMIE examination & have completed 3 years service." Regulation (Unamended):- " 5o/o of posfs of Assis/ant Engineer/ Civil may be reserved for promotion from amongst the graduate in Civil Engineering/ AMIE qualified, who possess fhis qualification before joining the service of the Board & have completed 3 years service in that capacity." Office Order No. 405 dt: Regulation 10.4 (amended):- "14o/o of the Assisfant Engineer/ Civil shall be reserved for departmental employees (Technical Subordinales & Drawing staff), possessing AMIE/ Degree in Civil Engineering who have completed 3 years service in that capacity.t' The 6th Proviso of Regulation 16 of the above regulation amended as under:- "Provided sixthly that in case two or more technical subordinafes from different categories become eligible for promotion to the rank of AE on fulfilling the requisite conditions against 14% reservation provided in the said Regulation 10.4, their seniority for and on appointment as AE shall be determined as under :- (a) ln order of their acquiring prescribed qualification of AMIE/ Degree in engineering, the subordinafes who clear the final examination in earlier batch & complete a minimum of 3 years service will be placed above those fulfilling the two conditions subsequently. The seniority placed on the basis shall be framed as & when the subordinates fulfill fhese conditions & maintained up to date.., \r ^ l*, \]L\LV' -> {/./ l Page 2 of 37

5 -5* (b) ln case of persons passing the examination in the same batch, in order of their sfafus & sca/e of pay, the higher paid & of higher sfafus being Placed senior. (c) ln case of subordinates enjoying equal sfafus, according to their relative seniority, in the seniority in the subordinate c/ass to which they belong to and. (d) '!,,f!,',',,'1,:::::",,tr:,x# ':t'il:i' :::',nlt,oz';rl;':,'::##',', identicat sca/e & if the date of appointment is the same, in order of comptered as a quati,ed Technicat Subordinate i.e. three years service wilt be counted after date of declaration of ctarifica,,, r::,:,'';:: ;:;:::::::"'::,::i "i"::,'::::';:::'" result of the acquired requisite quatifications while maintaining the seniorilies in 14% AMIE/Degree Hotder quota of the Technicat Subordinates. Eequlation CirculM That the above said Regulation was challenged in the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No of 1997 titled as Sh. Jagjit Singh Gill & others V/s PSEB & another. The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court on dated passed the stay order as under:- "No one appears for the respondent in spite of service. Adjoined to SePtember 11,1997. Till then, the operation of the order at Annexure-P3 shall remain stayed." That the office of Jt. Secretaryl Services-1 (Gazetted-ll) vide their office U.O. No. 942 dated referred the matter to the office of Legal Advisor, to ask whether to fill the vacancies falling under amended regulation 10.4 though the Hon'ble High Court passed the stay order. The Legal Advisor white their office U.O. No.221l LB-z (39947) dated was gave the legal opinion, which is as under:- " The stay order would affect post of AEs (Civil) which are lying vacant and cannot be fitted up without the stay being got vacated. lt is suggested to fitt the post according to the existing regulation i.e. the regulation before the amendment dated was issued subiect to the outcome of the writ petition. " As per the office record, keeping in view the above legal opinion, the case for promotion of JE/ Civil to AE/ Civil under unamended Regulation were considered during 09/ 98 but the same was kept pending as no vacancies were available at that time. That again the request from Association of junior engineers (Civil) vide memo. No. Spl./ 55/ AJEC/ dated was received. The Association demanded to promote the JE/ Civrl as AE/ Civil under unamended Regulation 10.4 and 10.6 respectively. The whole case was discussed in details and the decision was taken to put up the case in Board for review. Thus, with the approval of worthy Chairman, PSEB, memorandum No.42lEB' 4Ail CC dated "Promotion of AMIE/ Degree Holder JEs (Civil) to that of AE/Civil" was put up before the Board. The Board in its meeting 06/ 01 held on at Chandigarh and decided as under:- \ /iw' / \, \"hwo -yl''; V Page 3 of 37

6 l, -6- rr The Board decided that the promotions of AMIE/ Degree Holder qualified JE (Civil) should be made as per the old regulations prevalent prior to keeping in view the stay granted by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana high court, without prejudice to the outcome of the decision of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No of 1997." That as per the above decision, the particulars for promotion of Technical Subordinates as AEs/ Civil under unamended Regulation 10.4 were called vide memo. No dated (wherein the name of Er.Gurpreet Singh Chadha was at Sr. No. 1 1) and memo. No dated After receipts of the particulars of the concerned officials from their respective Chief Engineers, the panel for promotion of Technical Subordinates as AEs/ Civil under unamended Regulation 10.4 was prepared and DPC held on dated (for the year ) approved 4 no's general category officials (Er. Bawa Singh, Er. Satish Chander Goyal, Er. Bal Krishan, Er.Jagjit Singh (who were at Sr. No. 1, 2,3 and 4 in the above said lists) and 1 No. reserve category official (Er. Gurmeet Singh), which were promoted vide Office Order No.653 dated and office order no. 772 dated respectively against the available vacancies. No further vacancies were going to arise till That during the consideration year ,7 No's AE/ Civil (promoted under unamended Regulation 10.4) were working but 2 No's vacancies were expected to occurs during the consideration year hence DPC meeting was held on dated and the name of 4 No's general category officials (Er.Jagdish Chander, Er. Gobind Ram, Er. Darbara Singh and Er.Sushil Kumar) were approved for promotion and only 2 No's officials (Er.Jagdish Chander & Er. Gobind Ram (who were much senior to Er. Gurpreet Singh Chadha)) were promoted vide office order No. 774 dated and office order No. 56/ BEG-Il dated respectively. 2. That Memorandum No. 101 EB-409/ vol. 5/ L dated was put up to the Board on the recommendations of the committee reconstituted vide Office Order No. 241 Pers dated to consider the representations of AMIE/ Degree holder JE/ Civil for removing stagnation in their cadre The committee recommended to reduce time gap from 4 years to 3 years from promotion of Assistant Engineer to Assistant Executive Engineer/ Civil, to divert 3% quota under Regulation 10.2 meant for drawing category to Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 & to divert as a one-time measure over and above the admissible quota 10 No. posts out of 12from direct quota to Regulation 10.4 & The Board in its 05/ 2006 meeting held on date , decided as under:- vol. held hl, "Revised Memorandum will be put up without reduce time gap." As per the above decision of the BoD, Memorandum No. 141 E8-409/ 5/ L dated was put up to the Board who in its meeting on on the ahove item decided as follows:- \,\,i,,..jii", \r/ *V Page 4 of37

7 -1- "Approved. ln case any anomaly arrses while implementing the decision, Chairman is authorized to take final decision." That after taking the final decision from Chairman PSEB on the anomaly surfaced in the case, the Office Order No. 518 dated was issued to divert 2 No. posts under Regulation 10.2 one each to unamended Regulation 10.4 & unamended Regulation 10.6 and divert 10 No. posts (6 No. posts to unamended Regulation 10.4 & 4 No. posts to unamended Regulation 10.6) with the condition that these extra posts given over and above the quota are adjustable against future vacancies becoming available under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10.6 (Unamended) & the seniority to officers promoted against these extra posts shall be admissible at appropriate place from the date posts under these unamended Regulations become available. Accordingly the promotions were made under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10 6 (Unamended) with the condition of seniority mentioned above. Due to the said conditions most of the officers promoted under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10.6 (Unamended) were not promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer/ Civil whereas their counter parts, also promoted over and above the quota under Regulation 10.1 (Diploma Holders) had been promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer/ Civil. Aggrieved by the clause of seniority, in the year 2011, the officers earlier promoted under Regulation 10.4 (Unamended) & 10.6 (Unamended) represented the department that the condition of seniority in Office Order No.51 B dated has been incorporated over & above the decision taken by the Board due to which they have not been promoted whereas their counter parts under Regulation 10. t has been promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer/ Civil & thus requested to remove the stagnation. That Memorandum No.19l E8-409/ Vol. 5/ L dated was put up to the Board for consideration & decision to amend the clause of seniority incorporated in Office Order No. 518 dated & to allow the seniority as Assistant Engineer/ Civil from the date of joining. The Memorandum was considered by the BoD in its 14th meeting held on & decided as u nder:- "Reso/yed that opinion of Legal section be obtained on the issue and then proposal be placed before the Board." That after incorporating the advice of Legal section Memorandum No. 201 EB-409/ Vol.-5/ L dated was put up to the BoD for consideration & decision. The BoD considered the Legal section opinion, other details given in the Memorandum, in its 1sth meeting held on date and decided as follows:- "Reso/yed that the approval to delete the clause pertaining to seniority from Office Order No. 518 dated and to allow seniority as Assisfa nt Engineer/ Civil w.e.f. their date of joining to fhose Asststanf Engineer/ Civil who have been promoted under unamended Regulation Page 5 of37

8 a- LJ 10.4/ 10.6 of PSEB Seryice of Engineer (Civil)-l965 as per provisions of aforesaid Office Order No. 518 dated be and is hereby accorded." That accordingly the Office Order No. 376 dated was issued & the officers promoted under unamended Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 were allowed seniority from their date of joining as Assistant Engineer/ Civil & were promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer/ Civil after the directly recruited batch of Er. Manjinder Singh & others due to said amendment. It is worth mentioning here that the amendment in regulation to divert direct recruitment post was made in regulation but was not notified in the official gazette which is required as per the decision of the High Court given in CWP. No of Sh. Desh Deepak Singh Sandhu joined Erstwhile PSEB on as Research Assistant. The basic qualification for this post was degree in Civil Engineering whrch he possessed at the time of his initial appointment. After eight years' service he was promoted as ARO w.e.f vide Office Order No. 185 dated Thereafter, the post of Assistant Research Officer (ARO) was held in abeyance vide Office Order No. BO44 dated which was subsequently abolished vide Office Order No.8354 dated & Er. Desh Deepak Singh was allowed to work on alternative posts. He made a request on dated that if his post with effect from the date of abolition is considered against the post of Circle Head Draftsman (CHD) being identical scale, he will have no objection to this merger. This request dated was put up through Memorandum No. 20 dated: , his case was considered by the Erstwhile Board and since the pay scale of CHD ( ) was identical with ARO, he was absorbed against the post of Circle Head Draftsman (CHD) vide office order No. 311 BEG-2 dated w.e.f i.e. the date when the post of ARO was abolished. Thereafter, his seniority in the Cadre of CH D was fixed at Seniority No. 246-A vide SE/ Personnel (Confirmation Section) letter No dated The officer requested that he may be given promotion as Assistant Engineer/ Civil under Regulation 10.2 of PSEB Service of Engineers (Civil) Regulations, Since Er. Desh Deepak Singh had not worked as DHD, therefore, does not fulfill the condition of 13 years'experience as provided under Regulation 10.2 for his promotion as Assistant Engineer/ Civil. Further, he had not passed the DAE for Technical Subordinates due to which he was ineligible for promotion as Assistant Engineer/ Civil. So he appeared and cleared the DAE for Technical Subordinates vide Office Order No 17 dated' After passing the DAE for Technical Subordinates on 22nd September 2010, Er.Desh Deepak Singh requested that he may be allowed relaxation in late passing the exam on the ground that he was earlier disallowed to appear in, the exam. As such, hg may be considered and promoted as Assistant 1, y#' (U,,n.^ \:"t.t V' *h"* age6or37

9 -q- Engineer/ Civil so that his seniority could be restored above the Research Assistants who were junior to him. lt is pertinent to mention here that Sh.Nand Kishore and Sh Atul Kumar Sharma who were also employed as Research Asstt. on and respectively were junior to Er. Desh Deepak Singh but after the inclusion of the post of Research Asstt. under Engineering Subordinates/ Technical Subordinates under Regulation 2 (h) they had passed the DAE prescribed for Technical Subordinates and got promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil under unamended Regulation 10.6 during Er. Desh Deepak Singh gave an undertaking that if his request is acceded to, he will not claim any financial benefits arising out of his deemed date promotion. Accordingly, his request was put up to the BoD in the shape of Memorandum No. 4l BEG dated: who considered the Memorandum in its 1Oth meeting held on at Chandigarh and allowed the relaxation as requested. Accordingly, Er. Desh Deepak Singh was promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil under unamended Regulation 10 6 vide Office Order No BEG-2 dated: and he was also granted deemed date promotion & seniority as Assistant Engineer/ Civil with effect from i.e. the date on which Er. Nand Kishore (RA) junior was promoted under unamended Regulation 10.6 & joined as Assistant Engineer/ Civil. 4. That Sh. Murari Lal (Junior Engineer/ Civil) worked in irrigation department on adhoc basis from to which was regularized Iater on. He was issued letter of appointment on against CRA No. 135 of 1984 & he joined the department on He completed his AMIE in Civil on He filed Civil Suit No. 1B dated to count his service from to for promotion & other benefits which was decided in his favour. The appeal filed by the department was also dismissed. The department filed RSA No of 2003 in Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court & ordered to stay the decrees of lower court. Since his basic t^ecruitment to the department was on the basis of his qualification as Diploma in civil, so his seniority was fixed as Sty No. 201 under Regulation 10.4 but in the light of RSA No of 2003, he requested to shift his seniority from Regulation 10.4 to Regulation He filed C.W.P No of 2007 for shifting his seniority from Regulation 10.4 to Regulation '1 0.6, which was attached to RSA No of On he represented the department that if his seniority is fixed under unamended Regulation 10.4 by treating him in service from then he becomes senior to Sh. Pardeep Singh Bhandari who has been promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil vide Office Order No. 533 dated & if the same is fixed under unamended Regulation 10.6, then he will become senior to Sh Nand Kishore who has been promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil vide Office Order No. 533 dated So Memorandum No. 111 CD-134 dated 19.A7.11 was put up to the I.. \,. W's,lt,r,'^jy, Y' 4-- Pase7or37

10 -)o- BoD to refix his seniority above Sh. Nand Kishore under unamended Regulation 10.6 & allow him deemed date promotion as Assistant Engineer/ Civil w.e.f The BoD considered the case in its 12th meeting held on & decided as under:- "Reso/yed thatthe approval of deemed date of promotion as AE/ Civil to Sh. Murari Lal JE/ Civil by allotting Sty No. 5-B/ 201 under Regulation 10.6 w.e.f i.e. from the date of joining due to promotion as Assista nt Engineer/ Civil of Sh. Nand Kishore iunior to him be and is hereby accorded." That the compliance of the above decision of the BoD was made vide Office Order No. 290/ BEG-ll dated That Er. Avtar Singh mahi (Code No ) was promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil vide office order no. 533 dated under SC quota post. But he filed CWP No of 2007 in Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, for grant of deemed date of promotion under SC category which was decided in his favour. The department filed LPA No of & SLP No of 2011against the above decision of the Hon'ble Court, which was also decided in the favour of the Er. Avtar Singh Mahi. He was given deemed date promotion as Assistant Engineer/ Civil w.e.f vide offtce order no. 390 dated 02J against the reserve quota post unamended Regulation That the Memorandum No. 19 dated was put up to the Board to fill 12 No. posts of direct quota from working employees having AMIE/ BE or diploma holder JE/ Civil with 12years'experience by conducting a test due to ban imposed by Govt. of Punjab on fresh recruitment. The Board in its meeting held on considered & decided as under - "After deliberations, the Board approved the proposal for making an internal recruitment of 12 no. Assrstant Engineer/ Civil from the serving Board employees in relaxation of Regulations as brought out in the Memorandum." That accordingly written test was conducted by Erstwhile PSEB on for recruitment of 12 no. Assistant Engineer/ Civil against CRA No from amongst serving board employees but the supervisory committee sealed the result. That only 1 No. candidate (Er Baljit Singh (Emp ld )) had qualified the test. On persistent request made by the applicant, the result of the test conducted on against CRA No was declared on after the Erstwhile Board considered the Memorandum No.34l CRA No. 255/ 05 dated tn its meeting held on and decided as under :- "After deliberations, the board decided that the result of written fesf conducted for the post of ^Assista nt Engineer/ Civil pd against CRA No. 255/ 05 be decided and process of se/ection be completed." That in compliance to the above order the letter of appointment issued vide Memo. No dated to Er. Baljit Singh by diversion of flirect recruitment/ open. market quota from within the serving PSEB [#o' tuu*,,>r'u, Y q"^.- Page Bori]7

11 emptoyees against cra No. zsst ;: Engineer on t;" ioined the department as Assistant That in the mean while Erstwhile PSEB decided to recruit AE's Electrical and Civil from open market and accordingly CRA No. 258/ 06 for recruitment of 263 No. AE/ OT (lncluding 13 No. Assistant Engineer/ Civil (OT)) was advertised against which written test was conducted on & the first Assistant Engineer/ Civil (OT) against this CRA joined the department on That the request of Er. Baljit Singh for his placement in seniority list of Assistant Engineer/ Civil from the date of written test i.e thereby making him senior to Engineers promoted/ appointed between to was put up to BOD vide Memorandum No. 21 dated , the BoD in its 15th meeting held on Mohali, passed the following resolution s:- "Reso/y ed that the approval to issue the draft of seniority list with proposed change giving one month's time to file obiection to the officers likely tioeiffected by the change be and is hereby accorded." ln view of the above the tentative seniority list of Assistant Engineer/ Civil w.e.f to was prepared by placing Er. Baljit Singh Assistant Engineer/ Civil at Sr. No. 432 above the officers selected against the subsequent CRA No.25Bl 06 as per proviso First of Regulation-16 (Seniority) Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation accordlng to which persons appointed as a result of earlier selection shall be senior to those appointed as a result of subsequent selection. The tentative seniority list of Assistant Engineer/ Civil w.e.f to was circulated vide Memo No t EG-4t sty- 134 dated & objections were invited within one month. The objections of the officers who submitted their objections were considered vide Memorandum No. 1Bt EG-41 Sty-1341 vol.-3 dated by the BoD in its 2gd meeting held on date at Mohali & decided as follows:-,,resoly ed that the seniority No. 432 now assigne d to Er.Baliit Singh is correct, hence be and is hereby approved' Further Resolye d that the ctaim of the officer to assign seniority No. 3gT-A when he appeared for the fest against CRA No. 255/ 05 be and here by reiected. Further Resolye d that the objections/ Legat Notice given by the other effected officers be fited & the tentative seniority issued be & is here by declared as final." That according to the above decision the tentative seniority list of Assistant Engineer/ Civil w.e.f to (including the officers promoted under unamended Regulation 10.4 and 10.6 after allowing seniority to those who were promoted against over and above quota post from the date of joining), was declared as final vide this office Memo No / EG-4/ Sty- I 1 dated Page 9 of37 ii,v "-w {fi'$ruu* _ l^''

12 F l'z- 7. lt is informed that the C.W.P No of 1997 was decided by the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court following orders:- It is trite that till the time the amendment is notified in the official gazette, it cannot be enforced. Though no conclusive statement could be made at bar, it appears that after filing of the writ petition, the amendment has been notified in the official gazette. lf that be so, the said amendment would come into effect only from the date when it is notified in the official gazette." "The writ petition is allowed and disposed of in the above terms. As a conseguence, in so far as the petitioners are concerned, their cases for promotion to the post of Assrstant Engineers shall be conside red on the basrs of Rules/ Regulations which were prevalent at the time they become entitled to the consideration." on dated by passing the As per the above decision of the Hon'ble High court, the office of Dy. CEI Personnel (Confirmation Section), PSPCL, Patiala, put up the case to the Hon'ble BOD. The Hon'ble BOD in its 43'd meeting which was held at Mohali on , passed the following resolutions:- " FURTHER RESOLVED THAT fhe seniority of Civil Subordinates in 14% AMIE/ Degree Holder Quota will be re-cased w.e.f as per Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Couri decision in CWP No of 1997 on and amended regulation on the fulfillment of two conditions i. e. completion of three years senrice and acquiring requisite qualifications. Three years seryice will be counted as a qualified technical subordinate. lf any official acquires AMIE/ Degree during his service, the three years service will be counted from the date of declaration of result of the degree. FURTHER RESO LVED THAT the seniority to Er. Desh Deepak Sandhu will be allotted w.e.f in 14% AMIE/ Degree Holder quota from the date of completion of three years service as CHD. While other Research Assistants will be allotted the seniority in the same quota w.e.f i.e. from the date of inclusion of post of Research Assista nts in Technical Subo rdinate Category as reco mmended by the committee. FURTHER RESO LVED THAT any employee who becomes junior due to re-fixation of seniority will not be reverted to avoid litigation but will be allotted seniority to consequential senior employee in promoted ranks as per inter-se seniority in the subordinate c/ass. FURTHER RESO LVED THAT the three years' service will be considered to be completed as a qualified Technical Subordinate i.e. three years service will be counted after date of declaration of result of the acquired requisite qualifications while maintaining fhe seniorities in 14% AMIE/ Degree holder quota of the technical subordinates. FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Dy.CE or SE/ Personnel will be authorized to issue the offer of appointment to Technical Subordinates and all the candidafes must be allowed to join up to a specified date of 4 weeks of appointment mentioned in the offers at Patiala, so that no controversy occurs because of this issue, However, for all other intents and purposes HOD concerned will remain authorized as per prevalent instructions elaborated in "Appendix- B" of Technical Seryices C/ass-I/I, Regulation-l996. Also it will be clearly mentioned that if any appointee does not join up to 4 weeks of specified joining date mentioned in the offers of appointment for any reasons, then he will /oose the inter-se seniority for promorror*\, However, in exceptional cases, WTDs will be Pageloor3T Wr\*ruy Sq,,t V.W

13 authorized to allow extension in*ro'r,l^n period withoutthe loss of inter' se seniority. FTJRTHER RESO LVED THAT the above cited amendment in resolution- O&7 wilt be applicable prospectively and will become the part of Service of Engineers Regulation-l965 (Electrical & Civil) after the approval of the same from Board of Directors, PSPCL & inclusion in the Serl'tice Regulations. FIJRTHER RESOL VED THAT Dy.CE/ Personnel shall ensure all formalities are being followed. As per the above decision of the Hon'ble BOD, the office of Dy.CE/ personal (Confirmation Section), PSPCL, Patiala, circulated the tentative seniority list of AMIE/ BE holder Civil Technical Subordinates under 14% quota of AMIE/ Degree holder, vide their office Memo No S.L.T.- 7Sl JE Civit dated & after obtaining the objections from the concerned officials/ officers, the same was finalized vide their office Memo No. 1659/ 60/ S.L.T JE Civil dated Due to the issuance of seniority of AMIE/ BE holder Technical Subordinates as per the court orders, the seniorities lists of Assistant Engineer/ Civil, which were already circulated by this office, are required to be revised. The expected changes in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil for the period to & in the tentative seniority list for the period to were circulated vide this office Memo No / EG-tV/ Sty-114t Loose Dated' & the revised seniority list of AEE/ Civil for the period to was circulated vide this office Memo No. 4665t 4764/ EG-lV/ Sty-1141 Loose Dated' These seniorities were prepared by just replacing the persons promoted under unamended Regulations with the officer in the lrst dated as per seniority. The detailed report of the obiections raised by the officers and the view of the committee is as follows:- a. Er. Charaniiv Sinqh Brar. AEE/ Civil (Code No ) Er.Ravinder Sinqh qedi. AEE/ Civil (Code No and Er.Baldev Krishan. AEE/ Civil (Code No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contented that they are Sr. No. 1,2 and 3 in the tentative seniority list dated (prepared under unamended Regulation). They were also at Sr.No. 1,2 and 3 in expected changes in the list of AE/ Civil issued on dated and revised tentative Seniority list of AEE/ Civil issued on They further contended that if vacancy position is made governing principle in finalizing the Seniority as directed by the Hon'ble Court of C.W.p No of 2016 their position in Seniority list remain unaffected & as such their seniority is not affected by vacancy position circulated pre & post Since they qualifies for the promotion to the post of Sr. Xen/ Civil thus V/r,\Ln,x,, (-rl\ Page Ll of37

14 - tq^ their case may be dealt separately and may be promoted as Sr. Xen/ Civil so that justice may be done with them. View of the Committee:- The case of these officers was scrutinized and observed that these officers joined in the department on , and respectively and were BE qualified at that point of time. There contention that they at Sr. No. 1, 2 and 3 is correct as per tentative seniority Iist of civil technical subordinates dated and finalized on dated Further, none of the BE/ AMIE's holder fulfill both the eligibility crlteria before the officers in question in amended regulation. Moreover their position in the now re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (which has been prepared keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to remains unaltered. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure- B). Thus the committee is of the view that their demand is legitimate and thus may be accepted and needful may be done without prejudice to the outcome of the Court Cases already pending/ likely to be filed in different Cou rts. B. Er. Pritpal Sinqh,(Code. No ) and Er. Khem Chand (1086t4). The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that as per the order of Hon'ble High Court it has been expected to circulate vacancy position pre and post July, 2004 whereas the same has been circulated since Dec., Whereas they became eligible w.e.f That seniority list of Technical Subordinates as per the judgment of Hon'ble High Court dated was issued by the office of Dy.CE/ Personnel vide their office letter dated wherein they are placed in Sr No. 6 and 7 though that was not conducive to them as new criteria of minimum three years service after passing AMIE has been implemented while finalizing that seniority list against the criteria in vogue from 1993 to They requested to finalizing the seniority list of AEI Civil and AEE/ Civil as officers junior to them has been promoted as AE/ Civil, AEE/ Civil and Sr. Xen/ Civil. Vie-w of the Committee:- Regarding' the contention of the officers that they have not been supplied the information of the vacancy arose between the year 19BB to 1991, it is informed that in compliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court only the information regarding vacancy position based upon running roaster of vacancies / date of occurrence of vacancies since Dec to date was required to be supplied. The compliance of the same has been made by the Department vide officefl/e,mo. No I dated Moreover, (t, ('-..r fu'il tr \!,tt ut,.)(),, ' ' Y q"-- Page LZ or 37 / (..

15 * 15- the official senior to them (namely Er. Baldev Singh (Sty No. 337)) in the seniority lists prepared under unamended Regulation 10.4, was promoted agarnst the running roaster of vacancy during the year Dec, 2006 along with Er. Pritpal Singh, who was promoted against over and above quota post. Thus their claim to supply the running roaster of vacancy between the years 1988 to 1991 is hereby considered and rejected. Regarding the criteria of mrnimum three year's service as Technical Subordinate after attaining AMIE, it is observed that it is based upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K. K. Dixit and Others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board, that the conscious decision to implement the same has been made by the Corporation on the recommendations made by the committee after thorough deliberation. Hence their objections are hereby considered and rejected. Regarding their contention that their junior have been promoted as AE/ Civil, AEE/ Civil & Sr.Xen/ Civil, it is informed that the promotions with regard to AMIE/ BE technical subordinates were made under unamended Regulations & these officers were junior to them in unamended Regulation. Regarding their submission to finalize the seniority list, it is informed that they have been given opportunity of personal hearing by the committee in compliance to the Court Order in C.W.P No of 2016 in order to resolve the anomalous situation arose due to history of this case explained above. The committee will take appropriate decision as per the directions of the court and Rules & Regulations of the corporation. C. Er. Gurpreet 9inqh Chadha. AEF/ Civil (Code No ). The officer appeared before the committee on and as per his representation he informed that since 1991 to , 10 No's general and 1 No. SC vacancy arises and he had requested the department to inform how these vacancies were filled from time to time which has not yet been supplied to him Since the information supplied is not complete, so he is unable to represent his case but would like to avail the opportunity afforded by the department. According to him (5+1)officials were promoted against (10+1) vacancies and 5 general officials should have been promoted before A He further contested his case on the basis of one or two lines from many complete judgments passed by the different Hon'ble Courts and as such demanded that his seniority at the induction level may not be disturb while allowing him accelerated promotion in amended quota. He pointed out that the judgment dated passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia in the case of K.K. Dixit and others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board and another, has been implemented w.e.f and that too of other state having different Rules and Regulations. He further requested that the promotion may be made under unamended regulation till final decision by the Competent Authority. / <'t W'. \,, Page 13 of37,/ 'uw ' "jr*j

16 View of the Committee:- r6- Regarding the contention of the officer that he has not been supplied the information of the officers promoted against the vacancy arose between 1991 to , it is observed that in compliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court the information regarding vacancy position based upon running roaster of vacancies/ date of occurrence of vacancies from to date is to be supplied to the concerned and the same has been supplied by the office of Joint Secretary/ Services-l (Gazetted-lV), PSPCL, Patiala vide their office letter No / dated and no further information is required to be supplied to the petitioner because as per the orders of the Hon'ble Court, he is to present his case keeping in view the vacancies filled from time to time. Regarding his contention that (5 *1 No.) officials were promoted against ( No.)vacancies and 5 No. general officials should have been promoted before lt is observed that he has not mentioned the names of the (5 * 1 No.) officers he is claiming to be promoted during 1991 to July, As per the record approximately 10 No. officials who were much senior to him (Er Santokh Singh Chawla, Er.Lal Chand (SC), Er. Sham Sunder, Er. Bawa Singh, Er. Satish Chander, Er. Bal Krishan, Er. Jagjit Singh, Er. Gurmit Singh (SC), Er. Jagdish Chander and Er. Gobind Ram) were promoted during the said period.the committee further observed that the seniority No. of Er.Gurpreet Singh Chadha in unamended Regulation 10.4 was 344 and he was promoted as AEi Civil against over and above the quota posts on Whereas his seniors namely Er. Darbara Singh, Er.Sushil Kumar and Er.Davinder Kumar Sharma having seniority No. 277-A,313 and 318 (in unamended Regulation 10.4) respectively were promoted during the year Further his immediate senior Er. Baldev Singh having seniority No. 337 was promoted along with him during the year Dec.,2006. lt is due to the fact that vacancies were not available to promote Er. Gurpreet Singh Chadha in unamended Regulation 10.4, thus he was promoted against the over and above quota posts under unamended Regulation 10.4 with the stipulation that he will be allowed seniority from the date when the vacancy in his own quota will occur. The committee further observed that keeping in view of the running roaster of vacancies, his case cannot be considered for promotion before a4. He has quoted some judgment passed by different courts in his representation which either are not applicable in his case or his interpretation of the same is not correct. Regarding implementation of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K. K. Dixit and Others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board, it is informed that the conscious decision to implement the same has been made by the Corporation on the recommendations made by the committee after thofough deliberation. As such the committee after LLtur;.*' i?p' V "r+* Page r4or37 t

17 *l-lconsidering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. D. Er. Pafdgep Sinqh Bhandari (Code No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and contended that he has passed AMIE in , but the vacancy position from to is not circulated and also the dates when the etigible JEI Civil were promoted to the rank of AE/ Civil has not mentioned therein. The officer mentioned that he having seniority No. 159 in the seniority list issued on by the office of Chief Engineer/ Civil Design on the basis of which he was promoted as AE/ Civil on & assigned seniority No.414 and promoted as AEE/ Civil on He further contested his case on the basis of judgment dated passed by the Hon'ble High Court in CWP. No of and as such demanded that his seniority at the induction level may not be disturbed while allowing him accelerated promotion in amended quota meant for AMIE/ BE technical subordinates. He pointed out that the judgment dated passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndia in the case of K.K. Dixit and others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board and another has been implemented w.e.f and that too of other state having different rules and regulations. He further requested to supply the vacancy position from along with the dates when eligible JE/ Civil were promoted to the rank of AE/ Civil. He further contested that seniority of AE/ Civil and AEEI Civil allowed to direct batch of 2007 above him is incorrect. He pointed out that as per note given under Regulation-16, the amended Regulation is not appltcable upon him as he was confirmed as JE/ Civil on View of the Committee:- Regarding the contention of the officer that he has not been supplied the vacancy position from to , it is informed that in compliance of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court only the information regarding vacancy position based upon running roaster of vacancies / date of occurrence of vacancies from Dec., 1991 to date is to be supplied to the concerned and the same has been supplied by the office of Joint Secretary/ Services-l (Gazetted-lV) PSPCL, Patiala vide their office letter No / dated and no further information is required to be supplied to the effected officers/ petitioner, since as per the orders of the Hon'ble Court he ts to present his case keeping in view the vacancies filled from time to time. Moreover he had passed the DAE for technical subordinates vide Office Order No. 31 dated , so his demand to supply the vacancy position prior to Dec,, 91 doesn't hold any merits. Moreover, the official senior to him (namely Er. Baldev Singh (Sty No. 337)) in the seniority lists prepared under unamended Regulation 10.4, was promoted against the running roaster of vacancy during the y4ar Qec, 2006 along with Er. Pardeep Singh Bhandari Page f5,tu.t i,j- f/w' 'y' +,"#, 15 on37

18 -r8 - Singh, who was promoted against over and above quota post. Thus their claim to supply the running roaster of vacancy between the years 1990 to 1991 is hereby considered and rejected. The committee further observed that the seniority No. of Er. Pardeep Singh Bhandari is unamended quota in Regulation 10.4 was 362 and he was promoted as AE/ Civil against over and above the quota posts on whereas Er. Darbara Singh, Er. Sushil Kumar and Er. Davinder Kumar Sharma having seniority No.277-4,313 and 318 respectively were promoted in 11t 2OOS. Further his immediate senior Er. Janak Raj having seniority No. 346 was promoted along with him during Dec.,2006 against over and above the quota post. Thus the committee observed that keeping in view of the running roaster of vacancies, his case cannot be considered for promotion hrefore Regarding the contention of the officer that the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K.K. Dixit V/s Rajasthan Housing Board cannot be applied in his case, by quoting the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh in C.W.P of (O&M) is not correct, as the Regulation 9 in question in C.W.P. No of 2010, does not match with the Regulation of the Corporation. Moreover the Corporation has taken a conscious decision on the recommendation made by the committee after thorough deliberation in this case. Further the Clause 2 (b) of Regulation-16 is not applicable in his case. Regarding placement of direct batch of 2OO7 above the name of the officer in the seniority list of AE/ Civil & AEE/ Civil, it is informed that these seniority lists were prepared by replacing the officers (promoted under unamended regulation ) in seniority list dated 01t 201 3, with the officers as per final interse seniority of civil technical subordinates issued vide letter dated Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. According to which he is not senior to the officers selected against CRA No. 258/ 06. Regarding his claim that the amended Regulatron 16 is not applicable on him, since his services as JE/ Civil was confirmed on is misleading & incorrect, since he was not member of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation 1965 till the year Moreover, the said note to which the officer is referring came into force vide Regulation Circular No. 35/ BB (Office Order No.638/ Reg-2s-A/ Loose-148 dated ) & hence is applicable to the officers who became the member of Service of Engineer (Civil) Page 16 of37

19 As such the committee after;i: rering his representation rs of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected without prejudice to the outcome of CWP No of 2015 titled as Sh.Pardeep Singh Bhandari V/s PSPCL & others. E. Er. Bahaduf Sinqh Khroud (Cq91e No.J 08671) The officer appeared before the committee on and contended that the promotions of Engineers are governed by Services of Engineer (Civil/ Elect.) Regulation, 1965 and the same rules are prevailing in Haryana as well. Due to the implementation of the judgment of Supreme Court in case of K,K. Dixit V/s Rajasthan Housing Board, while preparing the seniority list of Civil Technical Subordinate, all the AMIE Holder become junior to their counterpart BE/ Holder, which is great injustice towards the AMIE Holder. He referred the judgment dated passed by the Hon'ble High Court in CWP. No of and requested to considered the case as per the judgment. The officer contended that the decision of Supreme Court in case of K.K: Dixit V/s Rajasthan Housing Board can't be applied to Engineer' Regulation View of the Committee:- Regarding the contention of the officer that the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K.K. Dixit V/s Rajasthan Housing Board cannot be applied in his case, by quoting the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh in C.W.P of (O&M) is not correct, as the regulation 9 in question in C.W.P. No of 2010, does not match with the regulation of the Corporation. Moreover the Corporation has taken a conscious decision on the recommendation made by the committee after thorough deliberation in this case. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. F. Er. Harbans Sinqh (Code No ). Er. Raiiv Kumar Ahuia (107388). Er. Charaniit Sinqh,(Code No ), Er. Raineesh. Kumar (Code No ). Er. Surinder Kumar Sharma-(Codq-No, ). Er. Bahadur Sinqh (Code Ng ). Er. Chimqn Lal (Code No ). Er. Kanwalpreet Sinqh Bhullar (Code No-, ). Er. HarinCer Sinqh (Code No" )?nd E[. Mohd, Rashid (Codq No, 10748?l The representation of the above mentioned 10 No.'s officers was received jointly but only 6 No's officers (Er.Rajneesh Kumar (Code No ), Er. Surinder Kumar Sharma (Code No ), Er Chiman Lal (Code No ), Er. Kanwalpreet Singh Bhullar (Code No ), Er.Harinder Sin'gh (Code No ) and Er.Mohd.Rashid (Code No ) appeared befo{e thq committee on and contended that a \Uau_1;, fu',- /ru" V' "W \ page t7 or3l

20 - 2o* situation has arisen where AE/ Civil who were promoted in the year has became junior to those who were promoted during the year , due to non publication of office order No. 405 dated , consequent stay granted by Hon'bte High Court in CWP. No and subsequent order dated of the Hon'ble Court to implement it w.e.f They also claimed that they would have been promoted in the year but due to the above reason and no action on the part of concerned section their promotion has been delayed from one to six years than their juniors. They demanded that to rectify the situation & they may be granted deemed date of promotion as AE/ AEE/ Civil, keeping in view the sth proviso of Regulation- 1 6 and instruction regarding deemed date promotion dated They further demanded the promotion as Sr.Xen/ Civil on the basis of deemed date of promotion as AEE/ Civil. View of the Committee:- That the Regulation 10.4 and 10.6 unamended were clubbed and Regulation 10.4 amended was formed vide office order No. 405 dated 21.OS.1ggT, the said order was challenged by some AMIE Holder JE/ Civil by filting C.W.p No of 1997 titled as Sh. Jagjit Singh and others V/s PSEB and others in Punjab and Haryana High Court. The Hon'ble High Court on dated passed the stay order. Subsequently, on the request of different official and union/ Association, the Board decided to make the promotion under unamended Regulation 10.4 and 10.6 without prejudice to the outcome of C.W.P. No of 1997.'The Hon'ble High Court decided the sald writ petition on dated n compliance of these order a new tentative seniority list of Technical Subordinate under amended Regulation 10.4 having qualification AMIE/ BE degree was prepared w e.f The contention of the officers for granting them deemed date of promotion in the light of proviso Sth and deemed date instruction dated is wrong and misleading because they are seeking the deemed date of promotion on the basis of amended seniority lists issued during the year 2015 with those officers who were promoted under unamended Regulation lt is pertinent to mentioned here that the persons promoted during the year were senior to these officers in the seniority list issued under unamended Regulation. Moreover those officers were not promoted temporarily as per the sth proviso of the Regulation 16 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation, Further these officers were not in the zone of consideration in the year 2005/ 06 because they were much junior to the officers with whom they are now seeking deemed date of promotion. As such their right of promotion as AEI Civil and AEE/ Civil had not accrued during those years. lf their demand is accepted then not only the rights of the officers recruited directly during the year 2OOT & 2010 will be infringed but it will also result in a situation where all JEt Civil Technical Subordinate will be promoted as AE/ Civil under unamended Regulationl in the year 2005/ 06. Further, most of the tltr* ir; I lr1,)' V (, Page 78 or37 / -^),:' tz,/.$ry

21 * 2-l* applicants would have actually been promoted in amended Regulation 10.4 much later than their actual promotion granted to them in unamended Regulations. l.t is further added that the promotion granted to some of thg_se officials as AE/ Civil is against the decision of the Board to_allow over And aboye quota p"ost as a onetime measure. Even their case for granting deemed date of promotion is not covered under the rules. As such the committee after considering their representation is of the view that their representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. ln continuation to the above representation submitted on dated the officer Er. Mohd. Rashid has sent one more representation dated which is also hereby considered and rejected. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period lo have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which they have been allotted appropriate place. G. Er. Chiman Lal (BC) (CoCe No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that the officer's who passed the departmental Examinations before him were placed above him in the seniority list of AEE/ Civil, is wrong. He further demanded to fill the promotional quota of Backward Class in the cadre of Sr. Xen/ Civil. View of the Committee:- The officer didn't mention the name of any officer, who was placed above him in the said seniority. Now passing of the Departmental Examination late doesn't affect the seniority as AEE/ Civil since, the promotion's of AE/ Civil to AEE/ Civil are governed by the instructions circulated vide Office Order No. 941 dated lt is further added that the promotion granted tqsome of the offtcials as AE/ Civil l_s against the decision of the Board to allow over and above quota post as a one time measure. The officer demanded to promote him as Sr.Xen/ Civil under quota reserved for the employees/ officers belonging to Backward Class, but now there is no such reservation allowed to the employees/ officers belonging to Backward Class as per the instruction of reservation issued by the Govt. of Pu nja b. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roasteq & AEE/ Civil for the period ta \\'',,,',,.^ {,r-,1 k/' V -('} tr \g\""r- Page 79 of 37

22 22* have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. H. Er. Harbans Sinqh. (Qgde No.1,07L99) The officer appeared before the committee on and contended that the seniority list of AEE/ Civil circulated vide letter dated is acceptable to him and the same may be finalized at the earliest. The officer further requested to allow him deemed date of promotion as AEE/Civil with Er. Davinder Kumar Sharma, who is much junior to him and on behalf of which he demanded the promotion as Sr. Xen/ Civil. View of the Committee:- Regarding the contention of the officer that he may be allowed deemed date of promotion as AEE/ Civil with Er. Davinder Kumar Sharma who was promoted as AEE/ Civil on , it is observed that Er. Davinder Kumar Sharma (having Seniority No.31B (JE/ Civil)) was promoted as AE/ Civil on under unamended Regulation 10.4 and further as AEE/ Civil on on the basis of the promotion of AE/ Civil obtained under unamended Regulation Whereas Er. Harbans Singh (having Seniority No (JE/ Civil)) was promoted as AE/ Civil on under unamended Regulation 10.6 against the over and above quota posts and further as AEE/ Civil on on the basis of the promotion of AE/ Civil obtained under unamended Regulation From it, it is clear that the officer Er. Harbans Singh was not in the zone of consideration when the name of Er.Davinder Kumar Sharma was considered for promotion under unamended regulation. As such his right of promotion as AEE/ Civil, Sr. Xen/ Civil had not accrued at that point of time. Moreover both the officers were promoted as AE/Civil under different unamended Regulations. His case for granting deemed date of promotion is not covered under the Rules. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. I. Er. Nand Kishore. (Code No ) and Er. Atul Kumar Shal:fna (Code No ). The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that they have passed the BE (Civil) examination in June, 1985/1980 and joined the department in Feb./ March, 1987 against the post of Research Assistant (RA). At that time the post of Research Assistant was not included under the category of technical subordinates. Er. Nand Kishore filed a CWP No of 2002 in Punjab and Haryana High Court, with the prayer to consider and promote him as AE/ Civil from the post of Research Assistant under Regulation 10.6 of flseb Seqvice of Engineer (Civil) Regulation, (u,lw;:,i,*^ YP' \z Page?oor3. "h"--

23 * 2-3* The Hon'ble High Court allowed the Writ Petition on by directing the Department to consider the claim of the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of certified of the judgment. The claim of the officer was rejected vide office order No. 479 dated They further prayed that their seniority as Technical Subordinate may be fixed w.e.f. Feb./ March, 1990 and placed above Er. Pritpal Singh View of the Committee:- The officers are objecting on the seniority list of Technical Subordinate issued by the office of Dy. CEI Personnel (Confirmation Section), vide letter dated The seniority allotted to them as Technical Subordinate w.e.f is correct, as it was allotted to the category of Research Assistant from the date when their category was included in the list of Technical Subordinate. Er. Nand Kishore submitted with his request dated , a copy of his representation dated which stands already considered and rejected by the committee earlier itself. As such his objections are considered and rejected. Moreover, Er. Nand Kishore had also filed COCP No of in CWP No of 2002, which was disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court on dated Further the representation of Er. Atul Kumar Sharma is on similar line as that of Er. Nand Kishore, therefore his representation is also hereby considered and rejected on similar lines. J. Baldev Sinqh (Code.No ), Er. Subhash Chander (Code Nq ). Fr. Janak Rai (Code. No ) and Er. lnder Sinqh (Code. No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that the vacancy position w.e.f i.e. the date of passing of AMIE to is not available in the vacancy position circulated as per the order of Hon'ble High Court. They further contended that the promotions made against these vacancies have also not been supplied. As per the facts given in their representations their seniority earlier allotted to them as AE and AEE on the basis of the seniority of lower cadre was correct, which has been disturbed vrde letter dated They further contested their case on the basis of judgments passed by the different Courts and as such demanded that while allowing them accelerated promotion in amended quota their seniority in the promoted rank may be fixed as per interse seniority of the induction level. The officers also mentioned that the seniority altotted to them as AE/ Civil during the year 2013 was issued after taking the effect of outcome of CWP No of Now they are objecting that vide letter dated their seniority as JE has been pushed down and junior have been placed above them. L$rtul- -,>'' L*;. Y"f- Page 2L of il7

24 View qf the Comnlittee;- * 2+- Regarding the contention of the officers that they have not been supplied the vacancies arose between 19Bg to 1991 and information of the officers promoted against the vacancy position supplied to them, it is informed that in compliance to the orders passed by the Hon'ble H igh Court the information regarding vacancy position based upon running roaster of vacancies/ date of occurrence of vacancies since Dec., 1991 to date was required to be supplied and the compliance of the same has been made by the Department vide office letter No 50534/ dated and no further information is required to be supptied. Moreover, the official senior to them (namely Er.Davinder Kumar Sharma (Sty No. 318)) in the seniority lists prepared under unamended Regulation 10.4, was promoted against the running roaster of vacancy during the year Thus their claim to supply the running roaster of vacancy between the years 19BB to 1991 has no merit. Regarding their objection of lowering down their seniority as Technical Subordinates, it is informed that it is based upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K. K. Dixit and Others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board. That the conscious decision to implement the same has been made by the Corporation on the recommendations made by the committee after thorough deliberation. Hence their objections are hereby considered and rejected. The judgment quoted by them passed by different Hon'ble courts in their representation are either not applicable in their case or their interpretation of the same is not correct. As per record approximately 10 No's officials (Er.Santokh Singh Chawla, Er. Lal Chand (SC), Er. Sham Sunder, Er Bawa Singh, Er. Satish Chander, Er. Bal Krishan, Er.Jagjit Singh, Er. Gurmit Singh (SC), Er. Jagdish Chander and Er.Gobind Ram) were promoted during Dec., 1991 to July, Their contention that their seniority in the promoted rank may be fixed as per their interse seniority at the induction level of JEI Civil is not correct and is contrary to the Rules & Regulations of the corporation. Hence their demand having no merit and hereby rejected. Further their interpretation that their seniority as AE/ Civil was finalized vide letter dated after taking the cognizance of the decision passed by the Hon'ble Court in CWP No of 1997, is not correct as the certified copy (dated ) of the decision of the Hon'ble Court dated was received after finalization of the seniority of AE/ Civil. Moreover, the seniority list was finallzed subject to the condltron that the decisions of the Hon'ble courts will be applicable on this seniority list. The contention that their 35 years old seniority in the rank of JE has also been pushed down by the letter dated of Dy.CE/ Personnel, PSPCL, Patiala is also not correct, as their seniority in the rank of JE has not been altered with, r{thqr their seniority as technical subordinate for

25 * z5- accelerated promotion under amended Regulation 10.4 has been allotted as per the court orders. Further, their contention that they are senior to the direct recuritees of 2007 because, they were promoted earlier to the direct recruitment batch is also not correct. The department had promoted them under unamended Regulation 10.4, without prejudice to the outcome of CWP No of 1997 The officer's Er. Janak Raj & Er. lnder Singh were promoted under unamended Regulation 10.4 against over and above the quota posts and Er.Subash Chander & Er. lnder Singh were also given benefit of reservation. As such the committee after considering their representation is of the view that their representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which they have been allotted appropriate place. The officer Er. lnder Singh & Er. Subhash Chander in his separate request objected on the same lines quoted above. Hence need not to be discussed again for the sake of brevrty. Hence his objections are disposed off on the same lines. Another representation received from above mentioned officers is the copy of representation given by Er. Gurpreet Singh Chadha, hence need not to be discussed again for the sake of brevity. Hence their objections are disposed off on the same lines. K. Er. Subhash Chander (SC) (Code No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that he was passed the AMIE on and completed three years service on , as such as per the rule and regulations of the Department, he became eligible for promotion as AE/ Civil but he was promoted on He was further contended that he completed the three years service as AE/ Civil on and became eligible for promotion as AEE/ Civil but was promoted on and his name was mentioned at Sr. No. 171 in the seniority list of AEE/ Civil circulated vide Ietter dated Now the officer demanded that his name be placed in the common revised seniority list of AEE/ Civil at appropriate place above direct batch who are recruited as AE/ Civil in the year and promoted as AEE/ Civil in the year ln his another representation he contested his case on the basis of judgments passed by the different Hon'ble Courts and as such demanded that while allowing him accelerated promotion in amended quota his seniority in the prompte{ rank qay be fixed as per interse seniority of the 'L*, V.-$-r, r,agez3 orz7 tbr"ry {-' t,)

26 *26'- induction level. He also objected that he may be allowed the seniority as Technical Subordinate w.e.f. the date of passing of AMIE. He further demanded to implement the decisions regarding fixation of seniority prospectively from the date of notification. View of the Committee:- The committee of the view that the officer was promoted as AE/ AEE/ Civil under unamended quota 10.4 on the basis of reservation being the SC category official. He is not entitled to seniority from the date of joining as AE/ AEE Civil as per the landmark judgment passed by Hon'ble Court in Ajit Singh Janjua case. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. Regardrng the criteria of minimum three year's service as Technical Subordinate after attalning AMIE, it is informed that it is based upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K. K. Dixit and Others V/s Rajasthan Housing Board. The conscious decision to implement the same has been made by the Corporation on the recommendations made by the committee after thorough deliberation. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. L. Er. Avtar Sinqh Mahi (SC) (Code No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that his name is not placed as per his interse seniority in the revised seniority list of AEE/ Civil circulated vide Ietter dated as the officer named as Er. Manjinder Singh (Code No ) is junior to him. He further mentioned that he was allotted seniority No. 428 and the officer Er.Manjinder Singh (Code No ) was allotted seniority No.433 in final seniority list of AEt Civil circulated vide letter dated and he was allotted seniority No. 417 and the officer Er. Manjinder Singh (Code No ) was allotted seniority No. 433 in expected changes list of AE/ Civil circulated vide letter dated The officer further added that in both the seniority list he is senior to Er. Manjinder Singh. He was allowed the deemed date of promotion as AEE/ Civil w.e.f (actually promoted on ) and Er. Manjinder Singh was promoted as AEE/ Civil on He requested to place his name at Sr. No. 146-A above Er.Manjinder Singh in t[e revised tentative seniority list of AEE/ Civil on the $.\L*r^, n-iut' W jt,,.{,r' page z4or37

27 2+basis of proviso sth of Regulation-16 Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation View of the Committee:- The committee is of the view that the officer was promoted against reservation basis as AE/ Civil under unamended quota 10.6 by allowing over and above quota post and he was allotted seniority No. 428 on the basis of the promotion made under unamended quota He was further promoted as AEE/ Civil on reservation basis as per his seniority of AE/ Civil fixed as per his promotion made in unamended quota. lt is further added that he was granted deemed date of promotion as AE/ Civil & AEEi Civil under unamended Regulation 10.6 on reservation basis. He is not entitled to seniority from the date of joining as AE/ AEE Civil as per the landmark judgment passed by Hon'ble Court in Ajit Singh Janjua case. The promotion's of the officer and the seniority of AE/ Civil earlier finalized vide letter dated was subject to the outcome of the pending Court cases. The seniority list of AE/ Civil finalized vide letter dated , was not required to be circulated and finalized because at that time the promotions were made under unamended Regulation. lt was required to be circulated and finalized after taking the effect of the decision given by the Court in CWP No of While going through the record, it has came to the notice of the committee that over and above quota posts were given more than one time, which is against the decision of the BoD. Thus the seniority list of the officials promoted under unamended Regulation & finalized during the year 2013 infringe the Right of the officers selected by direct recruitment as the quota posts meant for direct recruitment were firstly diverted to the promotes with the stipulation that they will be allowed seniority from the date when the vacancy in their own quota will occur & subsequently this condition was withdrawn during the year 2011 retrospectively. This expected changes in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil was prepared by replacing the officers (promoted under unamended regulation ) in seniority list dated , with the officers as per final interse seniority of crvil technical subordinates issued vide letter dated The contention of the officer that his seniority as AEE/ Civil be placed above Er. Manjinder Singh is not correct because he was promoted as AE/ Civll on reservation basis under unamended quota 10.6 against the over and above quota post with the condition that the seniority allotted to him as per the vacancy arises in their quota. The condition of seniority waived off vide office order No. 376 dated is under challenge in CWP 4575 of 2013 which is still subjudiced. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AEI Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy posilion of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period $fu,* :l',) l!;,'t"' \, oh4' Page?5 or37 "y'- )1 i",/ *\

28 01.o7 zoo2 to31 03 zollhave o..i;:;rred. rhe same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. According to which he is not senior to Er. Manjinder Singh. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. M. Er. Mufari Lal (Codq No ) The officers appeared before the committee on and contended in his request that he having no objections towards the seniority refixed during the year 2015, hence need not to be discussed. N. Er. Charaniit S,inqh (Code No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and contended in his request that he is satisfied with the seniority of AEE/Civil refixed during the year 2015, hence need not to be discussed. O. Er. Nirmgl Singh. (Code N,o ) Ihe officer appeared before the committee on and submitted that he has no objections towards the seniority re-fixed during the year 2015, hence need not to be discussed. P. Er. Darbara Singh (Code No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and contended that he was promoted as AE/ Civil in and retired as AEE/Civil on As per the decision of BoDs he would not be demoted or promoted and being the retiree he may not be affected with new seniority lists. View of the Committee:- The officer was promoted as AE/ Civil under unamended quota and further promoted as AEE/Civil on on the basis of seniority fixed as per the promotion made under unamended quota. Now the re-revised seniority lrsts of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. The request of the officer to not to demote him is acceptable as the same is already decided by the BoD's. Q. Er. Pesh Deepak Sinqh Sandhu (Code. No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and requested to allow him the deemed date of promotion as AE/ Civil w.e.f under Regulation 10.2 (CHD Quota) of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation As per the facts given in his representation, the officer contended that his rpniority under Regulation 10.6 was withdrawn. He has tffll Page $,\tr*. N 26o137,4,*'. ) ii,

29 further mentioned that his earlier;;1, ror. granting him deemed date of promotion under Regulation 10.2 duly recommended by Chief Engineer/ GGSSTP, Ropar and marked by Hon'ble C.M.D. PSPCL, Patiala was rejected because of misrepresentation of the facts by the office of Joint Secretary/ Services-1. ln conclusion the officer requested to consider his case under Regulation 10.2 for granting him deemed date of promotion w.e.f and accordingly place him in the final seniority list of AE/ AEE/ Civil, View of the Committee:- It has been observed that the officer vide his request letter dated , requested to promote him as AE/ Civil as per Regulation 10.2 (CH D Quota) of PSEB Service of Engineers (Civil) Regulations, Accordingly, Memorandum No. 4l BEG dated was put-up before the BoD wherein all the facts relating to his case were included and it was recommended in the "views of the office" & "decision required" that his case for promotion as AE/ Civil need to be considered under Regulation 10.6 (unamended) instead of Regulation 10.2 which was approved by the BoD in its 1Oth meeting held on at Chandigarh. Accordingly, Er. Desh Deepak Singh was promoted as Assistant Engineer/ Civil under Regulation 10 6 vide Office Order No BEG-2 dated and he was also granted deemed date promotion & seniority as Assistant Engineer/ Civil with effect from i.e. the date on which Er. Nand Kishore (RA) junior was promoted & joined as Assistant Engineer/ Civil. Regarding misrepresentation of his case by the office of Joint Secretary/ Services-1, PSPCL, Patiala. lt is observed that there is a proper hierarchy via which the file moves to the Higher Authorities for consideration & decision. The facts given by the office of Joint Secretary/ Services-l are based upon the record & are available in Memorandum No. 4l BEG dated and Speaking order No. 167 dated & 59 dated Regarding his contention that he has worked as CHD w.e.f , on the basis of Memo No dated issued by the office of Deputy Secretary/ Services-1, attached by him with his representation is not correct. lt is mentioned that he was absorbed in the cadre of CHD from ARO vide O/o No. 31 dated & subsequently, relinquish the charge of ARO on dated (AN) in compliance to O/o No. 11Bl Zone-D dated Further, while allowing him the seniority under Technical subordinate, the BoD also considered him as Technical subordinate instead of CH D, othenruise there was no requirement to place his name in the seniority list of technical subordinates circulated by the office of Dy.CE/ Personnel (Confirmation Section) vide their office letter dated As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his Page 27 of37

30 - 3o* R. Er. Raiiv-Kumar Ahuia (Code No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and in his written representation the officer mentioned the list of events, from the year 2006 when the over and above excess quota post were given to Regulation 10.4 and 10.0 with the condition of seniority and deleting of clause in the year The officer mentioned that his name was placed above Er. Manjit Singh in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil which was circulated vide Ietter dated and on the behalf of which he requested for deemed date of promotion and refixation/ correction of seniority vide letter dated Now the officer again requested to place his name above the direct batch and before Er. Manjit Singh. View of the QomFittee:- The committee is of the view that the officer was promoted as AE/ Civil under unamended quota 10.4 by allowing over and above quota post and he was allotted seniority No. 416 in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil circulated in the year 2013 prepared solely on the basis of his promotion made under unamended Regulation. The seniority lists of AE/ AEE/ Civil were prepared in the year 2015, by replacing the officers (promoted under unamended regutation ) in seniority lists of AEI AEE/ Civil during the year 2013, with the officers as per final interse seniority of civil technical subordinates issued vide letter dated as a result of which the officials promoted under unamended Regulation against over and above quota were replaced by the another officials. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. According to which he is not senior to the officers selected against CRA No. 258/ 06. Further his contention that he is at sr. No. 11 in technical subordinates list and 11 No. post were available without over & above quota and thus he may be placed above sr. No. 146 in the seniority list of AEE/ Civil is not correct. As such the committee after considering his representation is of the view that his representation does not have any merit and hence rejected. S. Er. R?m Chander Naranq (Code. No ) The officer didn't appear before the committee on but sent his representation for consideration through Er. Rajiv Kumar Ahuja. ln his representation, he mentioned that he has no objections towards the seniority Page 28 of 37

31 _ 3t^ T. Er. Aiit Kume.!'(Code. No The officer appeared before the committee on and submitted that he has no objections towards the seniority re-fixed during the year 2015, hence need not to be discussed. U. Er. Baliit Sinqh. AFE/ Civil (Codg No ). The officer appeared before the committee on & contended that his seniority at Sr. No. 432 in the final seniority list of AE/ Civil circulated vide letter dated may be kept intact above Er. Manjinder Singh (AEE/ Civil) in the final seniority list of AEE/ Civil as his seniority as AE/ Civil is rightly fixed as per instructions circulated vide O/o. No. 158 dated by the office of CE/ HRD (Services-l). View of tler Comqittee:- The officer was working as JE/ Civil in the department when CRA No was published to recruit 12 No's AE (Civil) from eligible departmental candidates through internal recruitment against direct quota posts as there was ban imposed by the Govt. of Punjab for direct recruitment through open market. Since only 1 No. candidate was found eligible thus the department did not declared the result. On persistent request by the officer his case was considered and result of the same was declared and he was allowed to join the department during the year Subsequently he was allowed seniority as AE/ Civil above Er. Manjinder Singh selected against CRA No. 258/ 06 who were selected as AE/ Civil through open market recruitment in the meanwhile, which is under challenge in CWP No of It is worth mentioning here that action of the department to divert direct recruitment post for internal recruitment is not legally sustainable. Now the rerevised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which he has been allotted appropriate place. The above views of the committee are without prejudice to the outcome of CWP. No.4575 of 2013 titled as Sh. Manjinder Singh and others V/s PSPCL and another's in this regard. V. (Er. Parminder Sinqh ('!07690),, Er. Bikramiit Sinqh (107691), Er.Parvesh Diwan (107697). Er. Maniinder Sinqh (107693). Er.Ravinder Singh (107694). Er.Gurkanwal Sinqh (107696). Er.Baliit Sinqh (107705), Er.Charankanwal Sinqh (107686) AE/ OT/ Civi! Lb,\tut", Page 29 of il7

32 Z'z^ The officers appeared before the committee on (excepi Er.Charankanwal Singh (107680), who appeared before the committee on dated with a copy of the same request) and contended that the extra over and above quota post given to the officials under Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 (unamended quota) are bad in the eyes of Law as no amendment was made in the Regulation & further no notification in the official gazette has been made to that effect which was mandatory as per the procedure prescribed in Section 79 of Electricity Act. They further contended that these promotes (over and above) should be given the seniority from the dates the actual vacancies arises in their own quota. ln their representation they have further mentioned that "...in light of CWP No of 1997 filed in Puniab & Haryana High Courl by Sh. Jagjit Singh Gill & Others v/s PSPCL decided on , the Joint Secrefary/ Services-l, PSPCL, Patiala O/o no. 376/ BEG-ll dated for deleting the clause pedaining seniority from O/o No. 518/ BEG-ll dated and to allow seniority to fhose AE's/ Civil who had been promoted under Un-amended regulation 10.4/ 10.6 of PSEB Seryices of Engineers (Civil) Regulation, 1965 becomes null and void. The same amounfs to amending the quota of direct recruits in the se/ecfio n of AE's/ Civil. Whereas by way of office order, statutory Regulations cannot be amended, more so when procedure prescribed in section 79 of the Act is to frame the regulation(s) by notification in the official gazette. Judgment clearly states that till the time amended is notified in official gazette, it cannot be enforced. As a matter of facts no amendments of statutory regulations have been made so far in this regard. Further what to say even statutory rules cannot be amended retrospectively if they take away a vested right of any employee. That as per directions given by Hon'ble Puniab & Haryana High Court in CWP No.2734 of 2016 filed by Sh. Gurpreet Singh Chadha v/s PSPCT & others decided on the seniority t's to be allotfed as per running roster i.e. date of occurrence of vacancy in one's own quota..." Thus claimed seniority above the over and above quota promotes. They have sought the running roaster of vacancy position for the direct recruitment of AE/ Civil & further demanded seniority on that basis. View of the Committee:- Regarding supplying of the details of running roaster vacancy position for the directly recruited AE/ Civil, it is informed that the Hon'ble Court in CWP No of 2016 has directed the department to supply the running roaster vacancies relating to the promotion quota under Regulation 10.4 & lt is the matter of record that the vacancy for direct recruitment existed before the year That though the vacancy existed at that point of time but the department was unablq.to make recruitment due to ban imposed by the --;;-' PunjabGovernment. I ' (ht,rr:.. '' W" >v'-&* Page3oor3T \

33 --33- Though the department has all the powers to divert one quota post into another but necessary notification in the official gazette is required as pointed out by the Hon'ble Court in decision in CWP. No of 2016, which has not been done in this case. Further the committee is of the view that the condition of seniority imposed upon in office order No. 518 dt while allowing over and above quota posts cannot be deleted retrospectively vide office order No. 376 dt Moreover the action to divert direct quota posts towards internal recruitment as well as for promotion is not in order. Now the re-revised seniority lists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster) & AEE/ Civil for the period to have been prepared. The same are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B), in which these officers have been allotted appropriate place. This seniority list is without prejudice to the outcome of CWP. No of 2013 titled as Sh. Manjinder Singh and others V/s PSPCL and another's in this regard. W. Er. Charankanwal Sinqh (Code. No ) The officer appeared before the committee on and gave the same representation, as of Direct Batch of CRA No. 258/ 06. He further requested that the averments made by his colleagues on dated may be considered as his claim. Hence for the sake of brevity, his case needs not to be discussed here again. X. AE/ OT/ Civil ioined aqqinst CRA No.263/ 08 (2010 batch):- (Er. Sardara Singh (108336), Er. Sudhanshu Sood (108337), Er.Hemant Kumar Gupta (108338), Er. Parminder Singh (108340), Er. lnder Avtar (108342), Er. Sumit Katoch (108343), Er. Manjinder Singh (108535). The officers appeared before the committee on and contended that the department has been ignoring the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court in C W.P. No of 1997 and C.W.P. No of 2016 as the Court has categorically decided that any amendment cannot be enforced till it is notified in Official Gazette and more importantly such amendment will come into effect only from the date of notification. The department in complete contravention of the decisions of above mentioned cases and also against natural justice has been carrying out various amendments without notifying in official gazette that too retrospectively to give benefit to one category and denying the rights of other category. The officers further mentioned that during the year , the department has promoted JE/ Civil having qualification Degree/ AMIE to the post of AE/ Civil by allowing them over and above quota posts by diverting the posts meant for direct recruitment as one time rt'reapure qnce there was no vacancy available in their t--bttn*';. i,l'' W"' )C$-- \ page 3Lorit'

34 - 3+* quota. While allowing the over and above quota, it was clearly mentioned that the seniority to these AE/ Civil will be given from the date when their posts become available, even the promotion orders of the official were made subject to the outcome of C.W.P. No of 1997 which was pending at that time. During the year the department not only promoted the official, who were not entitled for promotion due to non availability of the vacancy in their quota but were given seniority retrospectively without issuing any notification in the gazette vide office order No. 376 dated They further mentioned that the department gave undue favour to one category at the cost of other thus denied the natural justice to them by following the policy of "Rob Peter and Pay Paul". They further mentioned that firstly the department gave promotion to one category when no post was available for them, secondly the promotion has been given against the post of direct quota, thirdly they have been given seniority over and above their quota and even in contravention to stipulation of their promotion order, fourthly and more importantly these persons are given subsequent promotion as AEE/ Sr.Xen by taking into consideration the date of their promotion as AE's. They further contented that as per record the promotion were to be made as a onetime measure but erstwhile PSEB promoted some more JEI Civil as AE/ Civil after , agatn against the orders of Hon'ble High Court and against natural justice. They mentioned that the department never prepared and circulated the seniority list which should have been prepared by placing persons promoted in as per the roaster i.e. by giving them seniority as and when seat become available as per their quota. The officers mentioned that by changing and amending the promotion criteria for the officers who have been promoted in or subsequently, PSPCL is directly changing the service conditions applicable for them at the time when they joined the department i.e. May, They also mentioned that the department had promoted the JE's during the year when the Punjab Government had already imposed the ban on the conversion of post of direct quota to promote quota. View of the Committee:- The committee of the view that the department has all the powers to divert one quota post into another but necessary notification in the official gazette is required as pointed out by the Hon'ble Court in decision in CWP. No of 2016, which has not been done in this case. Further the committee observed that the condition of seniority imposed upon in office order No. 518 dt while allowing over and above quota posts cannot be deleted retrospectively vide office order No. 376 dt Now the re-revised seniority Iists of AE/ Civil for the period to (keeping in view the promotions of these officers under amended Regulation 10.4, after considering the admissible quota and vacancy position of runnir{g roaster)$ AEE/ Civil for the period to t[t.\y.!,,.,t' W' 'Y.'s$.-' \ Page 32or37

35 have been prepared. T;T;" are annexed with the minutes (Annexure-B). Accordingly they have been allotted appropriate seniority. This seniority list is without prejudice to the outcome of the CWP. No.4575 of 2013 titled as Sh.Manjinder Singh and others V/s PSPCL and another's in this regard. A copy of the same representation was received from the officer selected against CRA No (2012 batch). The same is also hereby considered and disposed of in above terms. Observations & recommendations of the committee:- The amended Regulation 10.4 was formed by clubbing the unamended Regulation 10 4 & 10.6 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation 1965, during the year Since in the amended Regulation, the seniority & the promotion opportunities of the AMIE holder technical subordinates was affected. Thus they (Er, Jagjit Singh, Er. Bal Krishan, Er. Bawa Singh, Er.Darbara Singh, Er. Gurpreet Singh Chadha & Er. Janak Raj) challenged the same by filing the CWP No of 1997 in which stay was granted by the Hon'ble court. o The department took the decision of promoting the JE/ Civil (Technical subordinates) under unamended Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation-1965, on the request of the Union's/ Association's of JE/ Civil. lf the same had not been taken at that point of time, then the anomaly of senior officer promoted under unamended Regulation becoming junior in the amended Regulation & Vice-Versa, would not have arose. Moreover, this decision again benefited the AMIE Holders than the Degree holder's technical subordinates.. There was a complete ban imposed by the Govt. of Punjab on Direct Recruitment, even the instruction were received from the Govt. of Punjab to not to fill the quota post of Direct Recruitment by Promotion. But on the request of Union's/ Association's of JEt Civil, the BoD's decided to fill the quota post of direct recruitment by conducting a internal recruitment and then to divert the direct quota post to unamended Regulation 10 4 & 10.6 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation-1965 as one time measure vide office Order No.516 dated This decision again favored the AMIE/ BE Holders technical subordinates as direct quota posts were diverted to give them promotion which was not due to them. o The over & above quota posts were given to unamended Regulation 10.4 & vide Office Order No dated with the condition of allotment of seniority as and when the actual post in their quota would arise. The amendment of the same was carried out in the Regulation as per ttfe Ppwer conferred under clause 79 (C) of Electricity (-brrrr,,l page33or37 i*r' lp*+,$ 4"-

36 _ 36_ Act 1948 vide Regulation Circular No (office order No. 941 dated ). ln CWP No of 1997, the ground taken by the petitioners was that the department cannot amend the Regulations inconsistent with the Act without notifying the same in the official gazette. The relevant portion Section 79 of the Act reads as under:- "79, Power to make Regulations:- (a) (b) (c) The Board, may, by notification in the official gazette, make Regulations not inconsistent with this Act and the Rules made there under to provide for all or any of the following matters, namely.- XX xx xx x xx xx xx x the duties of officers and other employees of the Board, and their salaries, allowance and other conditions of service." The Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No of 1997 decided as under:- 7. The aforesaid plea has to be rejected in view of judgment dated rendered by Division Bench of this Court in LPA No 89 of 1995 titled "surjit Singh and another vs. Nirmal Singh and others". ln the said case, legal position was explained by the Division Bench in the following manner:- "We accordingly dispose of these matters with a direction to the Board to consider the case of only the parties to the present proceedings, taking into account that the regulations aforesaid were not enforceable as they had not been notified on the relevant dates. The necessa ry decision in this regard shall be taken within six months from the date that a certified copy of this order is supptied to the Board. The consequential relief shall follow. 8. To same effect is another Division Bench judgment of this Court in Haryana State Electricity Board vs. Rajender Singh Redhu and others" 2005 (4) Services Law Reporter 823. g. lt is trite that till the time the amendment is notified in the official gazette, it cannot be enforced. Though no conclusive statement could be made at bar, it appears that after filing of the writ petition, the amendment has been notified in the official gazette. lf that be so, the said amendment would come into effect only from the date when it is notified in the official gazette. That in another case (C.W.P. No of 2011), the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court decided as under:- il \ \,1i1r The respondents have not been able to show as to under the Rules by merely which provisiorfis o( law they have amended i u"' wdu' y 4"- Page 34 of 37

37 _2+issuing a circular. ln the reply reference has been made to Section 79 (C) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948 as a justification for carrying out the aforesaid exercise. Reference has also been made to the decision of Board of Directors in this respect. I am afraid the justifications offered by the respondents are unsustainable in the eyes of law. The Board of Directors itself derives its powers under the Electricity Supply Act and Section 79 (C) only enables the Board to take and give effect to decision pertaining to administrative matters the details of which have also been given in the said section. The respondents were thus wrong on both the counts. They neither had the power to amend the Rules and even if they did; the question is that they could not have placed a cart before the horse by incorporating amendments which were adopted at a subsequent date From the above decisions of the Hon'ble High Court, it is apparent that the department is having the power to make the Regulations under the Electricity Supply Act 1948 of Section 79 (C), but as per the Act, it is mandatory to notify the same in the official gazette, which has not been done while diverting the direct quota posts for not only internal recruitment but also while allowing over & above quota post under unamended Regulation 10.4 & '10.6 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation Thus committee is of the view that the decision to divert the direct quota posts for internal recrultment afd over Srabove quota posts is not leqally sustainable. Further, the office order No. 376 dated 23.1J.2011 for deletino the condition of seniority retrospectively is also not legally sustainable Further, the recipients of over & above quota posts have been shuffled/ changed now due to finalization of seniority of Technical Subordinates under amended Regulation 10.4, as per the directions of the Court order. Thus even othenruise, if department takes a call to allow over & above quota posts under amended Regulation 10.4 from the year 2006, the same benefit cannot be extended to the same officials who had actually received it at that point of time. Moreover, the Board had decided to allow the over & above quota posts under unamended Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 of Service of Engineer (Civil) Regulation 1965, which shouldn't be allowed in amended Regulation Even if the same is to be allowed in amended Regulation 10.4, the same cannot be allowed retrospectively., The official's/ officer's who were promoted under unamended Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 during the year , with the condition of the seniority in their promotion orders, remained silent from the year 2006 to During the year 2011, those officers again requested to delete the clause of seniority which was acceded to vide Office order No. 376 of retrospectively. Res.ultantly, most of the officers among promoted against over and above thh qubta, were promoted as AEE. The over & above (l lrnffr'r \r r. ( \-' f*"-.\l-' \U\i,I\) o 1,,* t - /.IV* Page 35 or lt7

38 = quota vacancies thus arose due to their promotions as AEE were not required to be filled. These vacancies were required to be calculated and filled keeping in view the admissible quota position which has not been done & some officials have been allowed promotions as AE/ Civil in excess to their quota posts, which has infringed the Right of seniority of other officers. The final/ tentative seniority lists of AE/ Civil issued during the year 2013 & tentative seniority lists of AEE/ Civil issued during the year were prepared & circulated on the basis of promotions made by the department from time to time. The seniority position which this list is depicting with respect to the most of the officers mentioned above (except the direct batch's & other promotes) is due to their promotions as AE/ Civil made against over & above the quota posts under unamended Regulation 10.4 & 10.6 & allowing the seniority from the date of their promotion vide office order No. 376 dated & their subsequent promotions as AEE/ Civil on the basis of their promotion as AE/ Civil against over & above quota. The benefit such as deemed date promotions/ seniority sought by such officers on the basis of finalized seniority list of the year 2013, cannot be acceded to in view of the comments given above. The list of expected Changes in the final/ tentative seniority AEI Civil was prepared by replacing the officers (earlier promoted under unamended regulation I 0 6) in seniority list dated , with the officials mentioned in the final seniority of civil technical subordinates issued vide letter dated Subsequently, the revised seniority list of of AEE/ Civil was prepared by replacing the officers (promoted earlier as AEE/ Civil on the basis of seniority issued during the year 2013) in seniority list dated & with the officers mentioned in the list of expected changes of AE/ Civil issued vide letter dated Thus the rerevised seniority list of AE/Civil and AEE/ Cjvil of the officers pronoted under Requlation 10.4 amended was. never prepared, which is now prepared (Annexure-B\ by keeping in view the admissible quota and vacancy position of running roaster, without taking the impact/ benefit of over & above quota posts allowed under unamended Regllation'S :L thereafter excess_ promotions allowed. Hence. the lists of expected changes in the seniority list of AE/ Civil & revised tentative S-enioriV list -o_f AEE circulated during the year 2015 are.required to be WithdrAwn.&.the now prepared seniority list of AE/ AEE/ Civil needs to be circulated. That not even a single officer presented his claim regardlng rights of consideration from the perspective of the running vacancies and as they were filled from time to time as per the guidelines given by the Hon'ble High Court in CWP No 2734 of 2016 The date of joining as AEI AEE/ Civil depicted in the revised lists now prepared (as per the direction given by the Hon'ble High Court in CWP No of 'l 997) hasfbeentbased upon the principle/ direction given by the l7;tt'r tuluu:> '\ \, n _ ).,L"'.i "k Page 36orit7

39 3q_ Hon'ble Court in CWP No of The time gap for the further promotions may be calculated on the basis of the date of joining mentioned in these lists since, the department has already taken the decision not to demote any of the officer promoted earlier.. No person should be allowed deemed date of promotion on the basis of these seniorities till the finalization of the court cases pending in various courts in this regard. o Committee observed that the seniority position of 3 No. officers namely Er. CharanjiUSingh Brar, Er. Ravinder Singh Bedi & Er. Baldev Krishan, in the seniority list AE/ Civil circulated & finalized during the year 201 3, seniority list AEE/ Civil circulated during the year 2013, expected changes in the seniority list of AE/ Civil circulated during the year 2015, revised tentative seniority list of AEEI Civil circulated during the year 2015 & the seniority list now prepared annexed with these minutes, is immune from the controversy in hand, hence their cases may be considered for promotion as Sr.Xen/ Civil.. The above views and recommendations of the committee are without prejudice to the outcome of CWP. No of titled as Sh. Manjinder Singh and others V/s PSPCL and another's and CWP No of 2015 titled as Sh.Pardeep Singh Bhandari V/s PSPCL & others The representations of the officers were deliberated upon by the committee in its meetings held on dated 21.' , , , , & and report is submitted on This report contains pages 1 to 37. I DA I A= 4b"ue..- tl@,,,t0 CE/ TS, PSPCL, CE/ Patia Ia. l, W{,*"0 HRD, PSPCL, Patiala. t-ut.,l*,,{} fl,.,-)rrt L Dy. ce/ \ \'."n"ior,fui ' Dy.'Secy./ Person nel, PSPCL, Patia la. PSPCL, Patiala. Zones, PSPCL, Patia Ia. Page 37 of37

40 4o- "Annexure-1$.' Attendence Sheetfor Perconal Hearing before the committee on dated to. lo.lol6 Name of the officer/ office Address PARMTNDER STNGH ( ), AEE Civil, TLSC Sub Divn,, PSPCL, ROPAR. BTKRAMJtT STNGH ( ), AEE Civil, Hydel Design, PSPCL, CHANDTGARH. PARVESH DTWAN (107692), AE E Civil. Mtc. Spl. Cell-1 S/D-2, PSPCL, PAT ALA. MANJINDER STNGH ( ), AEE Civil, O&M GHTP. PSPCL, LEHRA MOHABBAT. RAVi AEE Civil, Hydel Design, PSPCL, CHANDIGARH. GURKANWAL STNGH ( ), AEE Civil, Pilot Workshop, PSPCL, MOHALI. BALJIT STNGH (107705) AEE Civil, O&M Stage-ll GHTP, PSPCL, LEHRA MOHABBAT. CHARANKANWAL STNGH ( ), Signature Mobile No./ Amended office Address c\ct-(ql6g alp Tus L (w t t-' i PglcL-rfvtot^a-G i 1tv6l-r8of1 i z>l. s, ( ryr! atol' Q 4r,, Lua a64ct * t1t3l- {6,9,l C.^*,L t-"'te- ' s I O e.\ ', PSPIL, P q6u6t he o'u'rv1f?,uh>a q 6u6 t- nqe\ *eel u'ri l' I ft AEE/civil. con.& Mtc. DS (North) Zone, pspcl, JALANDHAR. AJ T KUMAR (107710), AEE Civil at the Disposal of PSTCL, patlatj. BALJTT STNGH (107957), AEE Civil O&M GHTP, PSPCL, LEHRA MOHABBAT. DESH DEEPAK STNGH SANDHU (A4liit, ---l- T qzqer-uq[+ i W(tle/-2)oul --.1 i I AEE civil against sr.xen/ civit con.& Mtc. DS (south), PAT ALA AWAR STNGH MAH (107392) AEE Civil Mtc. Spl. Cell-2 S/ D-1, pspcl, PAT ALA ATUL KUMAR SHARMA (107482),. ;--- I -- -i - i q6ubl)ll33i ; ' ' I l-- * *---! jl t, jteu 6 r1rr rzi J

41 -+l* t" SUR NDER KUMAR SHARMA (r0664il AEE(C) with SE/ Civil Works Circte, MOHAMMAD RASHTD 1rozafl AE Civil Works Sub Div., PSPCL, KHANNA NAND KTSHORE (107391), BALDEV KRISHAN ( ), AFE civil against sr.xen civit o&m, GGSSTP pspcl, RopAR RAVTNDER STNGH (107339); AEE civil against sr.xen/ civil con.&mtc.ds (central), pspcl, LUDHIANA CHARANJ V STNGH BRAR tiozss0), AEE civil against sr.xen/ civir(tech) with se TLSC, JALANDHAR office Address Signature Mobile No.l pspcl, pattatj AEE (Civil) Micro Hyd.Sch.at GGSSTP, pspcl, ROPAR SUBHASH CHAN DERJToT ), AEE Civil Works Sub Div.h[st, pspcl, JAI-ANDHAR /#br Amended office Address leub\ 2ud7 o qe\et-3q,.f.1' %q6t t"a)l a 1tq 6_l 16qb\ o9?s! BALDEV STNGH (1073ffi), AEE Civil Mtc.S/D RSD, PSPCL, SHAHPUR KAND 23i 6URpREET StNcll sh@ AEE Civil Works Sub Div., PSTCL, SANGRUR. PARDEEP STNGH BHANDART (i073861?6 q 6 t7{307 9Ul/1Dr-r j i AEE Civil Const. S/D, PSPCL, UCHHT BASST PRITPAL StNcH (107387), AEE/ Ovit, o/ o:- Pb. state council for sci. & Technotogy, sector-26, CHANDIGARH. MUMRI LAL (108572), AEE civil against sr.xen civil o&m, GNDTP, BATHINDA CHAMNJ T StNcH tlgmil AEE/ civil attached with se o&m, MHp, pspcl, TALWARA hw ry l Sttat ott? g I l"k6r 't{rr1 KHEM CHAND (108644), AEE civil Mtc" spl. cell-2, sub Division-2, pspcl, PAT ALA --l q6qbl-d l3l/ I I

42 * 1z- Name of the officer/ office Address Signature Mobile No./ RAM CHANDER NARANG (108645), AEE Civil at the Disposal of PSTCL, PATIAI-A Amended office Address 32 I MJNEESH KUMAR ( ), AEE Civil Pilot Workshop, PSPCL, MUKTSAR HARTNDER SrNGH (108649), AEE Civil at the Disposal of PSTCL, PATIAIA KANWALPREET STNGH BHULLAR (108648), AHE/ Civil attached with Sr.Xen T/L Div., PSPCL, BATHINDA AEE Civil at the Disposal of PSTCL, PATIAI-A BAHADUR STNGH ( ), AEE Civil attach with Sr.Xen/ Civil Cons. & Mtc Div., PATTALA NTRMAL STNGH (108799), AE Civil Con.& Mtc.DS (West) Zone, PSPCL, BATHINDA RAJ V KUMAR AHUJA (107388), AEE Civil O&M GNDTP, PSPCL, BATHINDA NDER STNGH (107447), AEE Civil Works Sub Div., PSPCL, BATHINDA JANAK RAJ (107385), AEE Civil at the Disposal of PSTCL, PATIALA DAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA (107140), Retd. Sr.Xen/ Civil, House No. 17, Power Colony, GGSSTP, PSPCL, Ropar. LAKFIWINDER SINGH (107389) Retd. AEE/ Civil, 148,T.4, POWER COLONY, LEHM MOHABBAT, DARBARA SINGH (A7138), Retd. AEE/ Civit, 441, Adarsh Colony, PATIAIA HARNEK SINGH (108071) Retd. AEE/ Civil, 127, Sewak Colony, PATIAIA. PARMNIK SINGH (108669), Retd. AE/ 25, PARK AVENUE, JALA.NDHAR. q t\ lol-- 1}\? Y 9g\ qbqlt - L>'T 7l 1r1 tl - tq >>> 16 qol - aq 15'6 16\Ll -nvt \

43 Ll z- Attendance Sheet of the Clvil Officers/Officials appeared for personal hearing on 2L,10.15 Name & Designation Employee ld 5ignature Harbans 5ingh. AEE/Civil,-1 \=s Bahadur Singh, AEE/Civil Desh Deepak Singh Sandhu, AEE/Civil Pardeep Singh Bhandari, AEE/Civil Charanjit Singh, AEE/Civil Rajiv Kumar Ahuja, AEE/Civil Nirmal Singh, AE/Civil Ajit Kumar, AEElCivil I e Ll t0 Lr( tfi,4\ \1L t-,&6\6\ us2,u*t^r\-,tsrs %..Lbb6t' 1 ffr(,1.1.u3 4eq6/'tgP-t6 Ram Chander Narang, AE/Civil h Davinder Kumar Sharma,Retd. Sr.Xen/Civil La khwi nder Si ngh, AEElCivil (Retd.) Darbara Singh, AEE/Civil(Retd.) Mqbolgoh Harnek Singh, AEE/Civil(Retd.) Parmnik Singh, Retd. AE/C vil Cha ra nkanwal Si ngh,aee./civil Y*q6t-2-t61/'

44 * 4q- Attendance Sheet of the Civil Office on 1 ' , Sr.No. Name and Designation Employee ld Signature 1 GU RI KBAL SI NGH,AEE/CIVI L SARDARA S I NG H,AEE/C IVI L HEMANT KUMAR GUPTA,AEE/CIVIL INDER AWAR,AEE/CIVIL Y 5 SU MtT KATOCH,AEE/CIVI L MANJ I N DER SI NGH,AEE/CIVI L r+ 7 PARMI NDER SI NGH,AEE/CIVI L I SU DHANSH U SOOD,AEE/CIVI L ,<ir--"^t-'S{ - \ -

45 *\s^ "Annexrre- 8 " Sr. No. R.. -Revised Tentative Seniority List of AE/ Civil for the period 0,l to Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Code No. DOB DOJ in the Board DOJ as AE/ Civi! Remarks 387 S.K. KOCHAR GN CHARANJIV SINGH BRAR GN RAVINDER SINGH BEDI GN BALDEV KRISHAN GN DAVINDER NATH GN RAM LUBHAYA GN TEJA SINGH GN RAM SARUP SINGH BHULLAR GN " SOM NATH GN NAIB SINGII GN SUBHASI- J CHANDER DHIMAN GN SAJJAN SINGH GN SUSHIL KUMAR GN NIRWAR SINGH GN ASHOK KUMAR GN BHARAT BHUSHAN HANDA GN VINOD KUMAR SALWAN GN MUNSHI RAM GN HARBANS SINGH GN , SUKHDEV SINGH GN KULDEEP SINGH SC MURARI LAL GN PRITPAL SINGH GN SHAM SUNDER GN o MANJEET SINGH GN PARAS RAM GN KHEM CHAND GN KEWAL CHAND GN PREETAM SINGH GN RAM RACHPAL GARG GN HARCHAND SINGH GN MANJINDER JINGH GN CHARANKAWAL SINGH GN HAMESH MITTAL GN BALJEET SINGH GN VIVEK CHAUHAN GN AYUSH GOYAL GN AJIT KUMAR GN PARMINDER SINGH GN BIKRAMJIT SINGH GN PARVESH DIWAN GN RAVINDER SINGH SC RUPINDER SINGH SC GURKANWAL SINGH SC

46 *\6-431 R P SINGLA GN " BALDEV SINGH GN JnGSOHAN SINGH SC RAM CHANDER NARANG GN s DARBARA SINGH GN DAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN VIJAY KUMAR GN S.C. BAJAJ GN VINOD KUMAR DHAMMI GN AMARJIT JASSAL SC " CHAMAN LAL SC RAMESH LAL GN AVINASH CHANDER SAYAL GN MOHINDER SINGH SC RAJINDER SINGH GN CHAMAN LAL GN BALVIR UINGH SG RAJPAL SOOD GN , KULWANT RAI SC SURESH KUMAR GN PARAMJIT SINGH KHURANA GN GURSEWAK SINGH GN " ISHWAR SINGH SC RAJIV KUMAR AHUJA GN CHARANJIT SINGH GN BALDEV SINGH GN AWAR SINGH MAHI SC RAJNEESH KUMAR GN GURIQBAL SINGH GN A 460 NAVEEN SINGLA GN SARDARA SINGH GN SUDHANSHU SOOD GN HEMANT KUMAR GUPTA GN PARMINDER SINGH SC INDER AWAR SC ' s SUMIT KATOCH SC JAGROOP SINGII GN 1 08s SOM NATH BC LAJPAT RAI GN PARMOD KUMAR GN KULDEEP SINGH GN SHAM LAL GN BACHITAR SINGH SC GAJINDER SINGH GN SUNDER LAL GN " RAM SINGH GN VINOD KUMAR GN PREM SAGAR SHARMA GN MANJINDER SINGH GN KAWALJIT SINGH GN

47 - 1+-" 481 SUBHASH CHANDER SACHDEVA GN RA.MPAL SHARMA GN " SLJKHDEV SINGH BRAR GN RAM DAS KATOCH SC TARSEM LAL SC "03.5s SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN KULWANT SINGH GN GURMIT SINGH SC SUSHIL KUMAR GN MANOHAR LAL GN RAJAN MEHRA GN KAPOOR SINGH GN VIJAY KHULLAR GN ANIL KUMAR GN ASHOK KIJMAR GUPTA GN TIKKA N,T.iTINDER SINGH GN RAJIV GARG GN RANJIT SINGH GN RAJESH MONGA GN BALJIT SINGH GN PARMINDER PAL SINGH GN SANTOKH SINGH GN GURMUKH SINGH SC RAMINDERPAL SINGH GN OM PARKASH SC " HARBHAJAN SINGH GN PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA GN s08 MALJINDER SINGH GN BHAN SINGH SC MANJIT SINGH GN RAJINDER SINGH GN PREM PAL SHARMA GN UTTAM CHAND GN GURNARINDER SINGH ATWAL GN KEWAI. SINGH SC MILKHI RAM SC DAMIIIDER Sr NGH SANDHU GN JANAK RAJ GN PARMINDER SINGH GN PARDEEP SINGH BHANDARI GN VED PARKASH GN " GURPREET SINGH CHADHA GN GURCHARAN SINGH GN B " APNINDER SINGH SC Expired on PREM PAUL SC " KRISHAN MURART SHARMA GN SATNAM SINGH SC BAHADUR SINGH GN PURAN SINGH GN

48 - e{8* 530 MALKEET SINGH SC " HARDEEP SINGH MANN GN Crt BC JIVANJOT SINGH BAJWA GN RAGHAV KHAJURIA GN A " VIKAS MITTAL GN " VIKAS GUPTA GN GURPREET BILLING GN RAMIL KUMAR GUPTA GN RAHUL ATTRI sc RAVINDER SINGH BAINS SC RAJINDER SINGH GN AMRIK SINGH GN SHINDER PAL STNGH SC RAMESH KUMAR PARBHAKER GN C R RAKFSH GN HAKESH I(ALRA GN ASHOK KUMAR WALIA GN GURINDER SINGH GN MANPREET SINGH GN s50 HARJIT SINGH GN GREESH KUMAR GN JAGJIT SINGH GN KEWAL KRISHAN GN HARCHARAN SINGH BRAR GN GURNAM SINGH BAJWA GN NARINDER PAL SINGH GN RAVINDER KUMAR GN RAM KISHAN GN SAT PAL SC KANWALPREET SINGH BHULLAR GN HARSH KUMAR GN SARWAN SINGH SC RANVIR BAHADUR SAJJAN GN GURPAL SINGH SC AMARJEET SINGH SC SUEIHASH C'JAND GARG GN RAJ KUMAR SC BALDEV CHAND SC Foot Notes (SC):- The following officers belonging to reserve category have been promoted as AE/ Civil on reservation basis but their name have not been incorporated in the seniority list. The names of ihese officers shall be inclujed in the seniority list as per their interse seniority' when their immediate senior's (under Regulation 10.4 amended) arealloted seniority as AE/ civil. Dr. No. I Name or rhe otficer (Er.) Gat: Code No. DOB DOJ in the Board DOJ as AE/ Civil Remarks 1 SUBHASH CHANDER SC s ND-ER SINGH SC *:-'l'"1i

49 * 4q* Note 01:- That the iollowing officers were promoted as AE/ Civil under unamended Regulation's 10.4t 1}.6.Their actual vacancies in amended Regulation 10.4 have not arrised yet (except Sr. No. 1, who was ineligible for promotion as AE/ Civil during the consideration year's 2011 to 20'16 since he didn't achieve the required bench marks). Hence they will be alloted seniority as AE/ Civil as and when their actual vacancy in the amended Regulation arises & they are found eligible against it. Sr. No. Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Gode No. DOB DOJ in the Board Remarks 1 MOHD. RASHID GN DESH DEEPAK SINGH GN BALJIT SINGH GN HARINDER SINGH GN NAND KISHORE GN " ATUL KUI\IIAR SHARMA GN NIRMAL bingi.i GN Sr. No. Note 02:- The Following officers were though promoted as AE/ Civil on the basis of unamended Regulation 10.4/ '10.6. But under amended Regulation 10.4, the officers retires as Technical subordinate before the actual vacancy for their promotion as AE/ Civil arises. Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Code No. DOB DOJ in the Board 1 LAKHWINDER SINGH GN PARMNIK SINGH GN Remarks VRS AS AEE W.E F VRS AS AE W,E.F HARNEK SINGH GN Retired on

50 -5o- Re-Revised Tentative seniority List of AEE/ civil for the period 01.07,2002 to SR NAME OF OFFICERS Cat: Code D.O.B. DOJ IN DOJ AS REMARKS No No. BOARD AEE 11i SANTOKH SINGH CHAWLA GN RETIRED 115 KULDEEP SINGH SC Now Sr. Xen 116 LAL CHAND SC Now Sr. Xen 117 GURPAL SINGH GN AEE 118 PARIKSHAT KUMAR GN RETIRED 119 GOVINDER SINGH SIDHU GN RETIRED 120 SUMESH BANSAL GN Now Sr.Xen 121 SATISH CHANDER GN RETIRED 122 BAL KRISHAN GN RETIRED 123 JAGJIT SINGH GN PARAMJIT SINGH GN AEE 125 INDERJIT SINGH GN JAGDISH CHANDER GN RETIRED 127 GOBIND RAM GN RETIRED 128 r(al,i-i.!..,al!'ingh GN VRS 129 HARBHAJAN SINGH GN RETIRED 130 SUBHASH CHANDER GN 1068' RETIRED 131 S K KOCHHAR GN s RETIRED 132 CHARANJIV SINGH BRAR GN AEE 133 RAVINDER SINGH BEDI GN AEE 134 BALDEV KRISHAN GN AEE 135 SUBHASH CHANDER DHIMAAN GN A9 RETIRED 136 SUSHIL KUMAR GN RETIRED 137 ASHOK KUMAR GN " RETIRED 138 BHARAT BHUSHAN HANDA GN RETIRED 139 VINOD KUMAR SALWAN GN RETIRED 140 HARBANS SINGH GN I AEE 141 MURARI LAL GN AEE 142 PRITPAL SINGH GN AEE 143 KHEM CHAND GN I AEE 144 MANJIT SINGH GN RETIRED 145 MANJINDER SINGH GN AEE 146 CHARAN KANWAL SINGH GN AEE 147 HAMESH MITTAL GN RESIGNED 148 BALJIT SINGH BC AEE 149 vtvek ch l g;1,qry GN RESIGNED 150 AYUSH GOYAL GN RESIGNED 151 AJIT KUMAR GN AEE 152 PARMINDER SINGH GN AEE 153 BIKRAMJIT SINGH GN AEE 154 PARVESH DIWAN GN AEE 155 RAVINDER SINGH SC AEE 156 GURKAWAL SINGH SC AEE 157 RAM CHANDER NARANG GN ,04.64 I DARBARA SINGH GN I RETIRED 159 DEVINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN SANDEEP GARG GN a RESIGNED 161 AMARJIT JASSAL SC RETIRED 162 CHAMAN LAL SC RETIRED 163 RAMESH LAL SC RETIRED

51 * sl ^ 164 MOHINDER SINGH SC " RETIRED. 165 KULWANT RAI SC RETIRED. 166 SURESH KUMAR GN RETIRED" 1e' RAJIV KUMAR AHUJA GN I AEE 168 CHARANJIT SINGH GN BALDEV SINGH GN AEE 170 AVTAR SINGH MAHI SC AEE 171 RAJNISH KUMAR GN I { GURIKBAL SINGH GN AEE 173 SARDARA SINGH GN AEE 174 SUDHANSHU SOOD GN AEE 175 HEMANT KUMAR GUPTA GN AEE 176 PARMINDER SINGH SC AEE 177 INDER AVTAR SC AEE 178 SUMIT KATOCH SC AEE 179 BACHITAR SINGH SC RETIRED 180 MANJINDER SINGH BC SURI]u..;ER KUMAR SHARMA GN Foot Notes (SC):- The following officers belonging to reserve category have been promoted as AEE/ Civil on reservation basis but their name have not been incorporated in the seniority list. The names of these officers shall be included in the seniority list as per their interse seniority, when their immediate senior's as AE/ Civil are alloted seniority as AEE/ Civil. SR. NAME OF OFFICERS Cat: Code D.O.B. DOJ IN REMARKS No. No. BOARD 1 SUBHASH CHANDER (SC) SC Now AEE 2 NDER SINGI.I (SC) SC Now AEE Note 1:- The following officers were promoted as AEE/ Civil on the basis of the their promotion made under unamended Regulation Now they cannot be alloted Seniority as AEE/ Civil, since some of them (Sr. No. 1 to 6) doesn't complete the condition of required time gap for promotion as AEE/ Civil on the basis of their date of joining as AE/ Civil under amended Regulation 10.4, while others (Sr. No. 7 to 13) have not been alloted seniority as AE/ Civil due to non-avaliability of the vacancy in their quota under amended Regulation Hence they thev will be considered fo allotment for seniority as AEE/ Civil later on as per the Rules & Regulations. SR. NAME OF OFFICERS Cat: Code D.O.B. DOJ IN REMARKS No. No. BOARD 1 JANAK R/ ' GN Now AEE 2 PARDEEP SINGH BHANDARI GN Now AEE 3 GURPREET SINGH CHADHA GN Now AEE 4 BAHADUR SINGH GN Now AEE 5 CHIMAN LAL GN Now AEE 6 KANWAL PREET SINGH BHULLAR GN Now AEE 7 MOHD. RASHIT) GN Now AEE 8 DESH DEEPAK SINGH SANDHU GN Now AEE 9 BALJ!T SINGH GN Now AEE 10 HARINDER SINGH GN Now AEE 11 NAND KISHORE GN Now AEE 12 ATUL KUMAR SHARMA GN Now AEE 13 N!RMAL SINGH GN Now AEE

52 Sr. No. Re-RevisedTentativeSeniorityListofAE/civilto,tn" Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Code No. 5z- v Arr,-r xqluu*zt' DOB DOJ in the Board DOJ as AE/ Civil Remarks 387 S.K. KOCHAR GN CHARANJIV SINGH BRAR GN RAVINDER SINGH BEDI GN s BALDEV KRISHAN GN I DAVINDER NATH GN RAM LUBHAYA GN TEJA SINGH GN s RAM SARUP SINGH BHULLAR GN SOM NATH GN a NAIB SINGH GN SUBHASH CHANDER DHIMAN GN SAJJAN SINGH GN SUSHIL KUMAR GN s NIRWAR SINGH GN ASHOK KUMAR GN BHARAT BHUSHAN HANDA GN VINOD KUMAR SALWAN GN MUNSHI RAM GN HARBANS SINGH GN SUKHDEV SINGH GN KULDEEP SINGH SC MURARI LAL GN I PRITPAL SINGH GN SHAM SUNDER GN MANJEET SINGH GN " PARAS RAM GN O KHEM CHAND GN KEWAL CHAND GN PREETAM SINGH GN s RAM RACHPAL GARG GN HARCHAND SINGH GN MANJINDER SINGH GN CHARANKAWAL SINGH GN HAMESH MITTAL GN BALJEET SINGH GN VIVEK CHAUHAN GN AYUSH GOYAL GN a7 424 AJIT KUMAR GN s PARMINDER SINGH GN A BIKRAMJIT SINGH GN PARVESH DIWAN GN RAVINDER SINGH SC RUPINDER SINGH SG Resigned 430 GURKANWAL SINGH SC R P. SINGLA GN A BALDEV SINGH GN " JAGSOHAN SINGH SC RAM CHANDER NARANG GNI

53 * 53'- 435 DARBARA SINGH GN DAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN VIJAY KUMAR GN s S C BAJAJ GN VINOD KUMAR DHAMMI GN AMARJIT JASSAL SC CHAMAN LAL SC RAMESH LAL GN AVINASH CHANDER SAYAL GN s MOHINDER SINGH SC RAJINDER SINGH GN CHAMAN LAL GN BALVIR SINGH SC RAJPAL SOOD GN KULWANT RAI SC SURESH KUMAR GN PARAMJIT S!NGH KHURANA GN GURSEWAK SINGH GN ISHWAR SINGH SC RAJEEV KUMAR AHUJA GN CHARANJIT SINGH GN { BALDEV SINGH GN AVTAR SINGH MAHI SC RAJNESH KUMAR GN I GURIQBAL SINGH GN NAVEEN SINGLA GN s SARDARA SINGH GN SUDHANSHU SOOD GN HEMANT KUMAR GUPTA GN " PARMINDER SINGH SC INDER AWAR SC SUMIT KATOCH SC i0 467 JAGROOP SINGH GN SOM NATH BC LAJPAT RAI GN PARMOD KUMAR GN s KULDEEP SINGH GN fi1a SHAM LAL GN BACHITAR SINGH SC GAJINDER SINGH GN I 475 SUNDER LAL GN RAM SINGH GN VINOD KUMAR GN PREM SAGAR SHARMA GN MANJINDER SINGH GN s KAWALJIT SINGH GN SUBHASH CHANDER SACHDEVA GN u.a RAMPAL SHARMA GN SUKHDEV SINGH BRAR GN RAM DAS KATOCH SC A7 485 TARSEM LAL SC SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN Ii,/

54 * KULWANT SINGH GN ' GURMIT SINGH SC s SUSHIL KUMAR GN MANOHAR LAL GN 10864'l s RAJAN MEHRA GN KAPOOR SINGH GN VIJAY KHULLAR GN ANIL KUMAR GN ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA GN s TIKKA NARINDER SINGH GN s RAJIV GARG GN RANJIT SINGH GN RAJESH MONGA GN s BALJIT SINGH GN PARMINDER PAL SINGH GN SANTOKH SINGH GN GURMUKH SINGH SC RAMINDERPAL SINGH GN IOM PARKASH SC HARBHAJAN SINGH GN PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA GN MALJINDER SINGH GN BHAN SINGH SC MANJIT SINGH GN s RAJINDER SINGH GN PREM PAL SHARMA GN UTTAM CHAND GN GURNARINDER SINGH ATWAL GN KEWAL SINGH SC MILKHI RAM SC DAVINDER SINGH SANDHU GN JANAK RAJ GN PARMINDER SINGH GN PARDEEP SINGH BHANDAR! GN I VED PARKASH GN GURPREET SINGH CHADHA GN GURCHARAN SINGH GN APNINDER SINGH SC PREM PAUL SC KRISHAN MURARI SHARMA GN SATNAM SINGH SC BAHADUR SINGH GN PURAN SINGH GN MALKEET SINGH sc HARDEEP SINGH MANN GN CHIMAN LAL BC JIVANJOT SINGH BAJWA GN RAGHAV KHAJURIA GN VIKAS MITTAL GN VIKAS GUPTA GN ' GURPREET BILLING GN Expired on S e/'

55 LL._ - --)-) 538 RAMIL KUMAR GUPTA GN " RAHUL ATTRI SC RAVINDER SINGH BAINS SC RAJINDER SINGH GN " AMRIK SINGH GN " SHINDER PAL SINGH SC RAMESH KUMAR PARBHAKER GN C R RAKESH GN " RAKESH KALRA GN ASHOK KUMAR WALIA GN GURINDER SINGH GN MANPREET SINGH GN HARJIT S!NGH GN GREESH KUMAR GN JAGJIT SINGH GN KEWAL KRISHAN GN s HARCHARAN SINGH BRAR GN GURNAM SINGH BAJWA GN s NARINDER PAL SINGH GN RAVINDER KUMAR GN RAM KISHAN GN SAT PAL SC KANWALPREET SINGH BHULLAR GN I HARSH KUMAR GN SARWAN SINGH SC s 563 RANVIR BAHADUR SAJJAN GN GURPAL SINGH SC AMARJEET SINGH SC SUBHASH CHAND GARG GN RAJ KUMAR SC BALDEV CHAND SC Foot Notes (SG):- The following officers belonging to reserve category have been promoted as AE/ Civil on reservation basis but their name have not been incorporated in the seniority list. The names of these officers shall be included in the seniority list as per their interse seniority, when their immediate senior's (under Regulation 10.4 amended) are alloted senioritv as AE/ Civil. Sr. No. Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Gode No. DOB DOJ in the Board DOJ as AE/ Civil 1 SUBHASH CHANDER SC INDER SINGH SC Remarks Note 01:- That the following officers were promoted as AE/ Civil under unamended Regulation's 10.4t Their actual vacancies in amended Regulation 10.4 have not arrised yet (except Sr. No. 1, who was ineligible for promotion as AE/ Civil during the consideration year's 20'1 '1 to 2016 since he didnt achieve the required bench marks). Hence they will be alioted seniority as AE/ Civil as and when their actual vacancy in the amended Regulation arises & they are found eligible against it. Sr" No. Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Code No. DOB u{ DOJ in the Board Remarks

56 - s6-1 MOHD. RASHID GN DESH DEEPAK SINGH GN BALJIT SINGH GN " ' HARINDER SINGH GN NAND KISHORE GN ATUL KUMAR SHARMA GN NIRMAL SINGH GN Note 02:- The Following officers were though promoted as AE/ Civil on the basis of unamended Regulation 10.4t But under amended Regulation 10.4, the officers retires as Technical subordinate before the actual vacancy for their promotion as AE/ Civil arises. Sr" No. Name of the officer (Er.) Cat: Code No. DOB DOJ in the Board 1 LAKHWINDER SINGH GN PARMNIK SINGH GN Remarks VRS AS AEE w.e.f VRS AS AE w.e f HARNEK SINGH GN Retired on

57 * 5+- Re-Revised Tentative Seniority List of AEE/ Civil for the period to SR. NAME OF OFFICERS Cat: Code D.O.B. DOJ IN DOJ AS REMARKS No. No. BOARD AEE 114 SANTOKH SINGH CHAWLA GN A1.03 RETI RED, 11s KULDEEP SlNGH SC Now Sr. Xen 116 LAL CHAND SC Now Sr. Xen 117 GURPAL SINGH GN "03 AEE 118 PARIKSHAT KUMAR GN RETIRED 119 GOVINDER SINGH SIDHU GN RETIRED. 120 SUMESH BANSAL GN Now Sr.Xen 121 SATISH CHANDER GN RETIRED. 122 BAL KRISHAN GN RETIRED 123 JAGJIT SINGH GN PARAMJEET SINGH GN s AEE 125 INDERJIT SINGH GN s JAGDISH CHANDER GN RETlRED 127 GOBIND RAM SHARMA GN RETIRED 128 RACHHPAL SINGH GN VRS 129 HARBHAJAN SINGH GN RETI RED 130 SUBHASH CHANDER GN RETIRED 131 S K KOCHHAR GN RETIRED 132 CHARANJIV SINGH BRAR GN s AEE 133 RAVINDER SINGH BEDI GN AEE 134 BALDEV KRISHAN GN AEE 13s SUBHASH CHANDER DHIMAAN GN RETIRED 136 SUSHIL KUMAR GN RETIRED 137 ASHOK KUMAR GN A5.09 RETIRED 138 BHARAT BHUSHAN HANDA GN RETIRED 139 VINOD KUMAR SALWAN GN RETI RED 140 HARBANS SINGH GN AEE 141 MURARI LAL GN 108s AEE 142 PRITPAL SINGH GN AEE 143 KHEM CHAND GN AEE 144 MAN..'IT SINGH GN RETIRED 145 MANJINDER SINGH GN AEE 146 CHARAN KAMAL SINGH GN AEE 147 HAMESH MITTAL GN RESIGNED 148 BALJIT SINGH BG AEE 149 VIVEK CHOUHAN GN RESIGNED 150 AYUSH GOYAL GN RESIGNED 151 AJIT KUMAR GN AEE 152 PARMINDER SINGH GN AEE 153 BIKRAMJIT SINGH GN AEE 154 PARVESH DIWAN GN AEE 155 RAVINDER SINGH scl AEE 156 GURKANWAL SINGH SC AEE 157 RAM CHANDER NARANG GN DARBARA SINGH GN RETIRED 159 DAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN SANDEEP GARG GN RESIGNED 161 AMARJIT JASSAL SC RETIRED 162 CHAMAN LAL SC RETIRED, 163 RAMESH LAL SC RETIRED. 164 MOHINDER SINGH SC I RETIRED 165 KULWANT RAl scl I RETIRED. 166 SURESH KUMAR GN RETIRED 167 RAJEEV KUMAR AHUJA GN s I AEE 168 CHARANJIT SINGH GN I S\ er s/

58 5B 169 BALDEV SINGH GN AEE 170 AVTAR SINGH MAHI SG AEE 171 RAJNESH KUMAR GN GURIKBAL SINGH GN AEE 173 SARDARA SINGH GN AEE 174 SUDHANSHU SOOD GN AEE 175 HEMANT KUMAR GUPTA GN AEE 176 PARMINDER SINGH SC AEE 177 INDER AWAR SC AEE 178 SUMIT KATOCH SC A AEE 179 BACHITAR SINGH SC RETI RED, 180 MANJINDER SINGH BC SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA GN Foot Notes (SC):- The following officers belonging to reserve category have been promoted as AEE/ Civil on reservation basis but their name have not been incorporated in the seniority list. The names of these officers shall be included in the seniority list as per their interse seniority, when their immediate senior's as AE/ Civil are alloted seniority EE/ Civil. SR" No. NAME OF OFFICERS Cat: Gode No. D.O.B. DOJ IN BOARD REMARKS 1 SUBHASH CHANDER (SC) SC s Now AEE 2 INDER STNGH (SC) SC Now AEE Note 1:- The following officers were promoted as AEE/ Civil on the basis of the their promotion made under unamended Regulation Now they cannot be alloted Seniority as AEE/ Civil, since some of them (Sr. No. 1 to 6) doesn't complete the condition of required time gap for promotion as AEE/ Civil on the basis of their date of joining as AEi Civil under amended Regulation '10.4, while others (Sr. No. 7 to 13) have not been alloted seniority as AE/ Civil due to non-avaliability of the vacancy in their quota under amended Regulation Hence they will be considered for allotment for seniority as AEE/ Civil later on as per the Rules & Regulations. SR. No. NAME OF OFFICERS Gat: Gode No. D.O.B. DOJ IN BOARD REMARKS 1 JANAK RAJ GN Now AEE 2 PARDEEP SINGH BHANDARI GN Now AEE 3 GURPREET SINGH CHADHA GN Now AEE 4 BAHADUR SINGH GN Now AEE 5 CHIMAN LAL GN Now AEE b KANWAL PREET SINGH BHULLAR GN Now AEE 7 MOHD. RASHID GN Now AEE I DESH DEEPAK SINGH SANDHU GN Now AEE 9 BALJIT SlNGH GNI Now AEE 10 HARINDER SINGH GN I 20" I Now AEE 11 NAND KISHORE GN Now AEE 12 ATUL KUMAR SHARMA GN Now AEE 13 NIRMAL SINGH GNI Now AEE