IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF XXXXXXXXXX
|
|
|
- Nathan Parker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF XXXXXXXXXX 1 1 WILLIAM J. PAATALO, Plaintiff, v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK Defendant. CASE NO. PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT COMES NOW Plaintiff, William J. Paatalo, by and through Pacific Property Law LLC, complains and alleges: I. NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff purchased the property at 00 East rd Street, Yachats, Oregon for $,00.00 on June, 0. A Warranty Deed was issued to Plaintiff and recorded as Sale Document No Plaintiff refinanced the subject property with a simultaneous 1 st & nd deed of trust with Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. ( WMB ) on August, 0. The first DOT was for $0, on an Option Arm loan, with the second DOT being a revolving equity line of credit (HELOC) for $,.00. (Aff. of WJP Exhibit E). ETC - 1 CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
2 1 1. In September of 0, Plaintiff was solicited by WMB by phone with an offer to increase his (HELOC) account by $, Plaintiff did not make an application, nor did Plaintiff seek a credit increase to this account prior to WMB s solicitation.. Due to no requirements being made of Plaintiff, in terms of providing income documents or filling out new applications, Plaintiff accepted the offer for the credit increase.. Shortly after the increase to the HELOC, Plaintiff engaged in a dispute with WMB in the fall of 0 for misapplying payments and reporting false derogatory information to the credit reporting agencies on the HELOC account.. While the dispute continued with WMB for the next four months, Plaintiff began to suspect fraud, and realizing that numerous violations under the Truth-In-Lending Act (TILA) had been discovered, such as the failure to provide proper Notices of Rescission on the 0 loans, the hyperinflated 0% increase on the appraised valuation of Plaintiff s property, and the falsifying of Plaintiff s income on his Residential Loan Application without his knowledge and consent, Plaintiff sent a written Notice of Rescission on both loans via certified mail to WMB on or about March, 0.. Shortly after WMB received Plaintiff s notice to rescind, Plaintiff received a letter from WMB declining his rescission and attaching a payoff quote of just under one million dollars. The letter informed Plaintiff that in order to rescind, he would have to first tender back the full amount of the debt which was impossibility.. After Plaintiff s rescission was declined and/or conditioned by WMB, his disputes did not end. Plaintiff entered into protracted litigation beginning in July of 0 against WMB, but due to WMB s failure on September, 0, his claims outside of the TILA violations went to the FDIC.. Plaintiff did not file a TILA Rescission claim in court against WMB, or through the ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
3 1 1 FDIC s FEIRRA claims-process because Plaintiff was told he had to tender first; an act that was impossible for Plaintiff to perform. WMB did not challenge the rescission letter in court nor did WMB take steps to properly rescind the transaction as was required under U.S.C. (b).. On April, 0, while Plaintiff s claims against WMB were in the hands of the FDIC, and after his credit had been negligently destroyed by WMB, WMB declared a default by recording a Notice of Default And Election To Sell document in the Lincoln County, Oregon land records as Doc. No (Aff of WJP - Exhibit A.). On July 1, 0, a series of documents including a Notice of Foreclosure, Trustee s Notice of Sale, and affidavits claiming that WMB was the beneficiary of Plaintiff s Deed of Trust were recorded in the Lincoln County, Oregon land records as Doc. No (Aff of WJP - Exhibit B.) 1. No assignments of either of Plaintiff s Deeds of Trust were recorded in the Lincoln County, Oregon land records transferring any of WMB s alleged beneficial interests to any other entity; specifically JPMorgan Chase. 1. On August, 0, a Trustee s Deed was issued to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as the purchaser of the subject property for cash consideration in the amount of $, (Aff of WJP - Exhibit C.). In late, JPMorgan Chase filed an unlawful detainer action against Plaintiff in Lincoln County State Court under Case No... Plaintiff answered the complaint with counterclaims asserting facts related to TILA violations, and recorded a Lis Pendens on the property in the Lincoln County Land Records on February, as Doc. No. -0. (Aff. of WJP Exhibit D).. In the midst of defending the unlawful detainer action, and with the Lis Pendens recorded on title of the property, JPMorgan Chase sold the subject property for $, on July 1,. ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
4 1 1. The Lis Pendens remains on title to this day.. Having reviewed the now recent U.S. Supreme Court s decision in Jesinoski v. Countrywide, Plaintiff sent JPMorgan Chase an additional Notice via certified mail on April, memorializing the March, 0 rescission (Aff of WJP - Exhibit E.). There has been no response from JPMorgan Chase.. As grounds for supporting the 0 rescission, Plaintiff alleges the following: II. JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND PARTIES A. Jurisdiction Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Subject Matter Jurisdiction is appropriate in this court where the primary dispute relates to possession and title to real property and causes of action that proceed therefrom over which this court has ultimate jurisdiction. Declaratory Judgment sought relates to rights in property in, contracts executed in, and documents filed in Lincoln County. Personal Jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction is appropriate in this court where the primary dispute relates to possession and title to real property and causes of action that proceed therefrom over which this court has ultimate jurisdiction. Declaratory Judgment sought relates to rights in property in, contracts executed in, and documents filed in Lincoln County. B. Venue. Venue is appropriate in this court where the primary dispute relates to possession and title to real property and causes of action that proceed therefrom over which this court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction. Declaratory Judgment sought relates to rights in property, contracts executed in, and documents filed in Lincoln County, Oregon. C. Parties ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
5 1 1. Plaintiff Paatalo is now a resident of the State of Montana and the Property in question is located at 00 East rd Street, Yachats, OR.. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.is the original lender as reflected on the Deeds of Trust dated August, 0 and recorded as Doc. No Nonparty J.P. Morgan Chase Bank acquired certain assets of Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. in September of 0 from the FDIC, through a Purchase and Assumption Agreement, after the FDIC seized Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. in one of the largest bank failures in U.S. History.. Nonparty J.P. Morgan Chase (hereafter CHASE organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, has its principal executive offices at 0 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina. CHASE engages in business in Oregon as a mortgage servicer, which collects debts owed, or purported to be owed, to another and secured by a DOT. There is no recorded transfer of assignment from WAMU to JP Chase Morgan.. Nonparty Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., 1 SE th St., Ste. 0, Bellevue, WA 00 (hereinafter NTS. ) conducted the illegal and unlawful sale of this property on August th, 0. III. ISSUES PRESENTED. The Federal Truth in Lending Act, U.S.C., Regulation Z. allow for a borrower to rescind the Note and Deed of Trust by operation of law. This occurred in this case as of March, 0 when Plaintiff sent the rescission notice and more than days had elapsed without any formal response from Washington Mutual Bank. 0. Specifically, the undisputed evidence shows that Plaintiff timely rescinded both of his 0 notes and deeds of trust under TILA U.S.C. (a) on March, 0, effectively voiding all contracts and debt. Therefore, Defendants had no standing to initiate a foreclosure or collect payments under the contracts because those contracts were extinguished by operation of law on March, 0. ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
6 This loan was the result of predatory lending; it was based on illegal and unfair business practices and fraud that were designed to force Plaintiff into forfeiting his property, valued at over $1,000,000 dollars. The law does not stand for such practices. Chase has no standing and has never had any valid title or legal right to Plaintiff s payments or a valid secured interest. How could it? Chase did not acquire WaMu s assets through the FDIC until September, 0; almost -months after Plaintiff rescinded the loans.. The facts are clear and undisputed; Plaintiff s loans were rescinded and extinguished by operation of law on March, 0, and no party could obtain any rights or interest to enforce contracts that were made void after this date. PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO DECALATORY RELIEF BASED ON HIS LEGAL RESCISSION UNDER TILA. TILA gives borrowers a right to rescind for some kinds of consumer credit transactions. U.S.C. (a); see U.S.C. (d) (right to rescind is unwaivable except in emergency circumstances). Rescission applies to transactions in which a creditor takes a security interest in an obligor s principal dwelling and in return, provides money on property the obligor uses for non-business purposes. U.S.C. (a). In TILA was amended to limit the time an obligor had to rescind a transaction to three years after the consummation of the transaction or sale of the property. U.S.C. (f).. Of primary concern, and importance, as clarified in the United States Supreme Court in Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 1 S. Ct. 0, 0 L. Ed. d 0, U.S. (), the obligor s exercise of the rescission triggers a series of steps through which the transaction is unwound. See Beach, U.S. at 1-1. First, when an obligor exercises his right to rescind, he is not liable for any finance charge or other charge, and any security interest given by the obligor ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
7 1 1 becomes void upon rescission. U.S.C. (b). Second, within twenty days after receipt of the notice of rescission, the creditor shall return to the obligor any money or property given as earnest money, down payment or otherwise, and shall take any action necessary or appropriate to reflect termination of any security interest created under the transaction. Ibid. Third, upon performance by the creditor s obligations under this section, the obligor shall tender any property the creditor has previously delivered (or its reasonable value). Ibid. Pursuant to Reg Z notice is given by mail, telegram, or other means of written communication. 1 C.F.R..(a)() ; See 1 C.F.R. Pt., Apps. H-, H- (Model forms for excising Rescission Right); 1 C.F.R..(a)().. Erroneously, lower Courts have misinterpreted as requiring the obligor to file a lawsuit to effect rescission. However, the plain language of the statute puts no such requirement on the obligor. That provision says nothing in terms of an action or a suit s commencement ; rather it speaks to the duration of the rescission right. Beach v. Ocwen Fed. Bank, U.S., (). The Supreme Court found that nowhere does (a) allow for a debate as to disputed or undisputed notices; simply put the transaction and its contracts are void as a matter of law upon mailing of the Notice of Rescission. Jesionski, supra, at. Based on the clarification of the TILA rescission by the Supreme Court, Plaintiff s contracts became void as of March, 0. Regardless to whether the creditor fulfills its legal requirement to return all funds paid on the loan and reflect the termination of the security instrument, the loan no longer exists; the contracts are void and any acts by any party based on the loan or contracts are illegal. Burden of Proof and Elements. All Plaintiff is required to show is the loan was rescinded by virtue of written notice. Period. He has done so providing his sworn testimony and evidence. Elements are by matter of law Proven by No Response to Letter ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
8 1 1 As a Matter of Law the Rescission was Effective as of March, 0.. The letter was mailed on or about March, 0; the creditor had days to file an action in dispute of the notice of rescission and chose not to do so. The loan and contracts are void and must be cancelled as a matter of law effective March, 0. Clarification of the Rescission is substantiated as of April,.. The letter memorializing the March, 0 Rescission was sent on April, ; Nonparty JPMorgan Chase had another opportunity file an action/response in dispute of the notice of rescission and chose not to do so. The loan and contracts were void as of March, 0 and must be cancelled as a matter of law. IV. RELIEF REQUESTED. Plaintiff re-alleges each of the previous allegations as if set forth fully herein. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff hereby requests Declaratory Relief per the March, 0 rescissions as follows: a. That Plaintiff be put back in title to the subject property as sole owner as is his right. b. That the foreclosure of Plaintiff s void Deeds of Trust be deemed null and void. c. That all documents recorded on or against title to the subject property in the Lincoln County, Oregon public land records after March, 0 be declared null and void. DATED this day of July,. Respectfully Submitted By: By: JOHN A. COCHRAN, WSBA # 00 Counsel for Plaintiff William J. Paatalo ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
9 1 1 ETC - CLACKAMAS, OR 0 PHONE (0) - FAX (0) -0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Paatalo v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON WILLIAM J. PAATALO, Plaintiff, Case No. 6:15-cv-01420-AA vs. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant.
No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. PAATALO APPELLANT
No. -1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. PAATALO APPELLANT 1 1 1 vs. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RESPONDENT APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE US DISTRICT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-IEG -JMA Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAVEH KHAST, Plaintiff, CASE NO: 0-CV--IEG (JMA) vs. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; JP MORGAN BANK;
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION MECHANICS LIEN/MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE SECTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION MECHANICS LIEN/MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE SECTION HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As TRUSTEE FOR THE NOMURA HOME EQUITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Chapman et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BILL M. CHAPMAN, JR. and ) LISA B. CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cv PGB-KRS.
Case: 16-16531 Date Filed: 08/11/2017 Page: 1 of 10 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16-16531 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cv-00445-PGB-KRS
Proof That Fraud Is Required To Foreclose Non-Judicially On WaMu Securitized Loans
Proof That Fraud Is Required To Foreclose Non-Judicially On WaMu Securitized Loans By William Paatalo Private Investigator February 16, 2016 See: http://bpinvestigativeagency.com/if-wamu-admits-to-destroying-the-chain-of-titlehow-can-chase-retroactively-correct/
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION 8 CASE NO. 09-CI-6405
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION 8 CASE NO. 09-CI-6405 BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING L.P. PLAINTIFF VS. DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHNSON,
NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI
NO. CAAP-11-0000166 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI KARPELES MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STELLA FAYE DUARTE; MORYLEE FERNANDEZ, and JOHN and MARY DOES 1-10,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ORDER AND REASONS
Case 2:09-cv-04568-EEF-SS Document 48 Filed 04/29/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MAREEYO MINNIE CALHOUN VERSUS HOMEOWNERS FRIEND MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., ET AL
Illinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Beneficial Illinois Inc. v. Parker, 2016 IL App (1st) 160186 Appellate Court Caption BENEFICIAL ILLINOIS INC., d/b/a BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION HOLLIS H. MALIN, JR. and ) LINDA D. MALIN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 3:11-cv-554 ) JP MORGAN; et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Case No. 2:15-bk-20206, Adversary Proceeding No. 2:15-ap United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston. March 28, 2016.
IN RE: STEPHANIE LYNNE PINSON and KENDALL QUINN PINSON, Chapter 7, Debtors. STEPHANIE LYNNE PINSON and KENDALL QUINN PINSON, Plaintiffs, v. PIONEER WV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant. Case No. 2:15-bk-20206,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE Plaintiff, Case No.: 07-24338-CACE vs. DIVISION: 02. JAMES
Stewart v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al Doc. 32 ELLIE STEWART v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 213-cv-00155-RWS Document 9 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION OVIDIU CONSTANTIN, v. Plaintiff, WELLS FARGO BANK,
Case 2:08-cv MSD-FBS Document 11 Filed 02/10/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINL i.
Case 2:08-cv-00413-MSD-FBS Document 11 Filed 02/10/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINL i Norfolk Division FILED FEB 1 0 2003 SHARON F. MOORE, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 BARBARA A. MATTHEWS (SBN ) Assistant U.S. Trustee MAGGIE H. MCGEE (SBN 1) Trial Attorney U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of the United States Trustee 1 Clay Street, Suite 0N Oakland,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-00-tor Document Filed 0/0/ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ANGELA UKPOMA, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. NO: -CV-0-TOR ORDER GRANTING
Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)
REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE (, ) S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program.
2015 IL App (1st)
2015 IL App (1st) 143114 FOURTH DIVISION December 24, 2015 No. 1-14-3114 LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Cook County. ) v. ) ) Nos. 12 CH 32727
Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:13-cv-06589 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 MERYL SQUIRES CANNON, and RICHARD KIRK CANNON, Plaintiffs, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., ) Case No. 08-12229 (MFW) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) ) Hearing Date: July
Filed 8/ 25/ 16 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Filed 8/ 25/ 16 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered
Supreme Court of the United States
No. - IN THE Supreme Court of the United States LARRY D. JESINOSKI AND CHERYLE JESINOSKI, INDIVIDUALS, Petitioners, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., SUBSIDIARY OF BANK OF AMERICA N.A., D/B/A AMERICA S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA/SACRAMENTO DIVISION. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
REYSNER LAW OFFICE PIOTR G. REYSNER 0 0 Truxel Rd., Suite A Sacramento, CA Ph: ( - Fax: ( 0-0 Attorney for Plaintiffs Individually and on behalf of the General Public of the State of California UNITED
Case 3:10-cv JPB Document 18 Filed 06/16/10 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 150
Case 3:10-cv-00012-JPB Document 18 Filed 06/16/10 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 150 SCOT FAULKNER and VICKI FAULKNER, Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Submitted December 6, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Koblitz and Manahan.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 112-cv-00228-RWS Document 5 Filed 03/21/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JOSEPH MENYAH, v. Plaintiff, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0184p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RODERICK ROBERTSON; LETITIA ROBERTSON, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Courthouse News Service
Case :0-cv-000 Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Robert R. Hager, NV State Bar No. Treva J. Hearne, NV State Bar No. 0 HAGER & HEARNE E. Liberty - Suite 0 Reno, Nevada 0 Tel: () - Fax: () - Counsel for
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
February 4 2014 DA 13-0389 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 32N ZACHARY DURNAM and STEPHANIE DURNAM for the Estate of ZACHARY DURNAM, v. Plaintiffs and Appellants, BANK OF AMERICA N.A.;
Follow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-28-2007 In Re: Rocco Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-2438 Follow this and additional
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC LEE S. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL
Case 3:11-cv BRW Document 1 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 12 FILED
Case 3:11-cv-00198-BRW Document 1 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 12 FILED u.s. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 03 2011 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO
Case 2:10-cv ODW -FFM Document 29 Filed 04/12/11 Page 1 of 101 Page ID #:560
#:0 Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID 0 0 INDEX INTRODUCTION PARTIES AND JURISDICTION JURY TRIAL DEMAND CLAIM FOR RELIEF BACKGROUND FACTS FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION VIOLATION OF CAL
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 23, 2017 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 23, 2017 Session 08/01/2017 JOHN O. THREADGILL V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 189713-1 John F. Weaver,
United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Marc Voisenat (CSB# 0 0 Broadway, Suite Oakland, Ca. Tel: ( - Fax: ( - Attorney for Debtors Richard Souza Caporale Isabel Ann Caporale United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California In
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JAMES GRAY and EVA GRAY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED June 11, 2013 v No. 312971 Macomb Circuit Court CITIMORTGAGE, INC., LC No. 2012-001696-CZ Defendant-Appellant.
Case: /21/2012 ID: DktEntry: 30-1 Page: 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 11-55423 11/21/2012 ID: 8411303 DktEntry: 30-1 Page: 1 of 5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED NOV 21 2012 MARGARET CARSWELL, No. 11-55423 MOLLY C. DWYER,
Emigrant Bank v Greene 2015 NY Slip Op 31343(U) February 24, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Allan B.
Emigrant Bank v Greene 2015 NY Slip Op 31343(U) February 24, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 703522/2014 Judge: Allan B. Weiss Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 04-2532 04-2533 RICHARD BELINI; THERESA LUSCIER-BELINI, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, Defendant, Appellee. APPEALS FROM
CHAPTER DEEDS OF TRUST
[Rev. 9/24/2010 3:29:07 PM] CHAPTER 107 - DEEDS OF TRUST GENERAL PROVISIONS NRS 107.015 NRS 107.020 NRS 107.025 NRS 107.026 NRS 107.027 Definitions. Transfers in trust of real property to secure obligations.
Defendant answers as follows:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF, Plaintiff INDEX NO: -against- VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT, Defendant. Defendant answers as follows: General Denial I plead the following Defenses
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Len Cardin, No. CV PCT-DGC Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0-dgc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Len Cardin, No. CV--0-PCT-DGC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Wilmington Finance, Inc., et al., Defendants.
Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINIOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:18-cv-01039 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINIOIS EASTERN DIVISION LEONARD SOKOLOW, on Behalf of Himself and All Others
Case Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18
Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., et
Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13-684 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States LARRY D. JESINOSKI AND CHERYLE JESINOSKI, INDIVIDUALS, Petitioners, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., SUBSIDIARY OF BANK OF AMERICA N.A., D/B/A AMERICA
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 03/22/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/22/2016
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 03/22/2016 07:11 PM INDEX NO. 52297/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/22/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER - - - - - - - - - -
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHISN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Debtor Mark Wilson / Wilson Construction, Glenmere Way Redwood City CA 0 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHISN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re Mark Wilson / Wilson Construction Debtor. Case No.:. -01-DM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NO. ED CV JLQ
Case :-cv-00-jlq-op Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 JANNIFER WILLIAMS, ) Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NO. ED CV-00-JLQ ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR ORDER
Case 3:16-cv-00178-MCR Document 61 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 927 MARY R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION vs. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD W. DAVIS, JR., MOTION TO
NC General Statutes - Chapter 44A Article 2 1
Article 2. Statutory Liens on Real Property. Part 1. Liens of Mechanics, Laborers, and Materialmen Dealing with Owner. 44A-7. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the following definitions
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Case No.:
Kirk D. Miller, WSBA #00 Kirk D. Miller, P.S. 1 W. Riverside Ave., Ste 0 Spokane, WA 1 (0) - Telephone (0) - Facsimile IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON KRISTINE ORLOB-RADFORD,
Gurevich v JP Morgan Chase 2013 NY Slip Op 33290(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /13 Judge: John A.
Gurevich v JP Morgan Chase 2013 NY Slip Op 33290(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 150159/13 Judge: John A. Fusco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
Plaintiff, ) ) ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM, AND ) THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT v. )
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF GREENVILLE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Bonnie U. Pittman, individually and as C.A. NO: 2016-CP-23-00945 Trustee of the Dorothy F. King Living
Onewest Bank, FSB v Dewer 2014 NY Slip Op 30397(U) February 6, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 23000/2010 Judge: David Elliot Cases posted
Onewest Bank, FSB v Dewer 2014 NY Slip Op 30397(U) February 6, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 23000/2010 Judge: David Elliot Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
Case 1:17-cv LJO-EPG Document 1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 1:17-cv-00759-LJO-EPG Document 1 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 83 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN M. SORICH (CA Bar No. 125223) John.Sorich@piblaw.com MARIEL GERLT-FERRARO (CA Bar No. 251119) Mariel.gerlt-ferraro@piblaw.com
Case 9:16-cv KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cv-81973-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 MIGUEL RIOS AND SHIRLEY H. RIOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-81973-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.
Filing # 15405805 Electronically Filed 06/30/2014 04:31:04 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-0-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of Honorable Thomas S. Zilly UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE TIFFANY SMITH, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge:
Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104120/2008 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM
Filing # 46814510 E-Filed 09/22/2016 04:42:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2014CA007769 AH MICHELLE SMITH, as Personal Representative
Case jrs Doc 273 Filed 03/23/17 Entered 03/23/17 11:18:05 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 IT IS ORDERED as set forth below: Date: March 23, 2017 James R. Sacca U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. NOW COMES the Plaintiffs and as Complaint against the above-named Defendants aver SUMMARY OF CLAIMS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Claude Williams and Glennie Williams ) Individually and on behalf of all ) similarly situated individuals, ) )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER
0 0 BROOKSTONE LAW, PC Jonathan Tarkowski, SBN Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 000 Santa Ana, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () 0- E-mail: jtarkowski@brookstonelaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LORRIE THOMPSON ) ) v. ) NO. 3-13-0817 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORPORATION, et al. ) MEMORANDUM
Supreme Court of the United States
No. IN THE Supreme Court of the United States IN RE DANIEL L. JUNK AND CHRISTINE H. JUNK ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: JMD Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/06/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Case: 17-10370-JMD Doc #: 54 Filed: 06/06/17 Desc: Main Document Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ******************************************* In Re: * * Chapter 7 William
Case 2:10-cv GCS-VMM Document 33 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-11006-GCS-VMM Document 33 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 5 RANDOLPH ABNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION vs. Plaintiffs, Case No. 10-CV-11006 HON. GEORGE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI US BANK TRUST, N.A. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document Apr 7 2017 15:30:20 2016-CA-01770 Pages: 28 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FRANKLIN N. WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. 2016-CA-01770 US BANK TRUST, N.A. APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT
Case Doc 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 11. 1IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division)
Case 14-00081 Doc 1 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 11 1IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division) In re: HAROLD O. ALEXANDER and PATRICIA D. ALEXANDER, Case No. 13-23848-WIL
Mortgage Inscription Cancellation Manual
Jon A. Gegenheimer JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT Mortgage Inscription Cancellation Manual REVISED 2015 This manual is presented as a guide to laws and forms applicable to mortgage inscription cancellation
In the Supreme Court of the United States
No. In the Supreme Court of the United States ALAN G. KEIRAN AND MARY JANE KEIRAN, Petitioners, v. HOME CAPITAL, INC., A GEORGIA CORP.; BAC HOME LOANS SER- VICING, L.P.; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, SUCCESSOR- IN-THE INTEREST TO THE PARK AVENUE BANK, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee H. JACK MILLER, ARI
Case 4:07-cv WLS Document 145 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 11
Case 4:07-cv-00019-WLS Document 145 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION BRADLEY Y. SCHORR and ) LORI A. SCHORR, Individually,
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48 TH STREET CAPITAL, INC., INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, ANSWER TO AMENDED -against- COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS OP EQUITIES, LLC AND
RBK Doc#: 1231 Filed: 09/02/09 Entered: 09/02/09 15:11:43 Page 1 of 13
08-61570-RBK Doc#: 1231 Filed: 09/02/09 Entered: 09/02/09 15:11:43 Page 1 of 13 Charles W. Hingle (Bar No. 1947 Shane P. Coleman (Bar No. 3417 Robert L. Sterup (Bar No. 3533 HOLLAND & HART LLP 401 North
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
GUARANTY GUARANTY dated as of, 200_ made by the undersigned (the "Guarantor") in favor of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and/or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates (individually or collectively, as the context
Mortgage Inscription Cancellation Manual
Jon A. Gegenheimer JEFFERSON PARISH CLERK OF COURT Mortgage Inscription Cancellation Manual REVISED AUGUST 1, 2017 This manual is presented as a guide to laws and forms applicable to mortgage inscription
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO. 508172/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ------------------------------------------------------------X
CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES
CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Act not to apply to certain societies 3. Interpretation 4. Appointment of Registrar of Societies 5. Societies deemed to be established
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 10/07/ /24/ :55 10:55 PM AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2015
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 10/07/2015 12/24/2015 06:55 10:55 PM AM INDEX NO. 63344/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2015 12/24/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Plaintiff, CASE NO: v. WINBERG, LOPEZ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-wqh-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Helen I. Zeldes (SBN 00) helen@coastlaw.com Andrew J. Kubik (SBN 0) andy@coastlaw.com COAST LAW GROUP, LLP 0 S. Coast Hwy 0 Encinitas, CA 0 Tel:
Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL
Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 713: MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO FORECLOSURE OF REAL PROPERTY MORTGAGES Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS... Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS...
CA Foreclosure Law - Civil Code 2924:
CA Foreclosure Law - Civil Code 2924: 2924. (a) Every transfer of an interest in property, other than in trust, made only as a security for the performance of another act, is to be deemed a mortgage, except
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON. No. 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES HEREIN, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON 1 1 CREDIT UNION, fka CREDIT UNION, a Washington corporation, vs., Plaintiff, Defendant. No. 1 ANSWER, GENERAL DENIAL, AND SPECIAL OR AFFIRMATIVE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Barry S. Fagan 0 Roca Chica Dr. Malibu, CA 0 Phone ( 1-10 Fax ( - pendinglawsuit@yahoo.com BARRY S. FAGAN, an individual; 1 vs. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, WELLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD W. DAVIS, JR., MOTION TO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Case :0-cv-0-ODW -FFM Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 THEODORE E. BACON (CA Bar No. ) tbacon@alvaradosmith.com FRANCES Q. JETT (CA Bar No. ) fjett@alvaradosmith.com A Professional Corporation W.
2:12-cv DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-15205-DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 MIQUEL ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-15205 v. HONORABLE
COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Green Tree Servicing L.L.C. v. Hoover, 2016-Ohio-1169.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC : JUDGES: : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee
RULE L-1143 COMMENCEMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT OR MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUTLER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
RULE L-1143 COMMENCEMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT OR MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTION (a) In all consumer credit and residential mortgage foreclosure actions, the complaint shall include a "Notice of Consumer Credit
Case 3:12-cv RCJ-WGC Document 49 Filed 03/25/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :-cv-000-rcj-wgc Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARK PHILLIPS; REBECCA PHILLIPS, Plaintiff, V. FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 4/10/18; Certified for Publication 5/9/18 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE RON HACKER, as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant,
In 2005, Lange borrowed $1.387 million from Washington Mutual (WaMu). The loan had a low interest rate of 1.35 percent for one year, but the rate
In 2005, Lange borrowed $1.387 million from Washington Mutual (WaMu). The loan had a low interest rate of 1.35 percent for one year, but the rate could thereafter float up to 10.3 percent. The loan was
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. CHANCERY ABSTRACT DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, in Trust for Registered Holders of Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-8, Asset Backed Certificates,
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. CHANCERY ABSTRACT TAX EASE FUNDING 2016-1, LLC vs. Plaintiff, JAMES PRUITT; MRS. JAMES PRUITT, Wife of James Pruitt; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC.,