Expert judgements of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research
|
|
- Archibald Carroll
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 European Journal of Political Research 37: , Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 103 Research Note Expert judgements of party policy positions: Uses and limitations in political research IAN BUDGE University of Essex, UK Introduction Estimates of party policy positions obtained from specialists through postal surveys (Castles & Mair 1984; Huber & Inglehart 1995; Laver & Hunt 1992; Ray 1997) have been increasingly used in the last 15 years to provide spatial pictures of party policy and ideology (Kitschelt 1994: 256; Ware 1996: 27 28). Their popularity rests partly on sheer accessibility the mean judgements of specialists about Left Right locations or particular policy positions can be used as reported without tedious data-processing. Expert judgements are also perceived as authoritative if we cannot trust the consensus of party specialists about where their national parties stand, what can we trust? Estimating the policy preferences of collective actors is crucially important to all branches of political science, particularly to studies of democracy and the mandate (Klingemann et al.1994) and to rational choice models which show how the distribution of initial preferences interact with rules and structural constraints to produce given outcomes (Baron 1991; Budge 1994). With expect surveys, have we found an easy, economical and authoritative way to identify party preferences as they change over time (Knutsen 1998), which is also capable of operationalising theory and checking it out (Laver & Shepsle 1996)? Maybe. But some problems remain. These have rarely been systematically discussed because the spatial picture experts give of party systems is both beguiling and in accord with previous institutional classifications (e.g., of party family, cf. Smith 1984: ). Thus the judgements have been taken at face value rather than having their bases critically examined. 1 Major problems relate to: 1. The party whose position is being judged is it the leaders, activists or voters or all three combined?
2 104 IAN BUDGE 2. The criteria experts base their judgements on - particularly when making a general Left Right classification (Huber & Inglehart 1995: 78). 3. Whether judgements refer to intentions and preferences or overt behaviour an important distinction when most theories use declared or implicit party preferences to explain overt behaviour. 4. What time period are judgements of policy position based on? the whole post-war era up to the survey? The instant at which the survey is administered? The election or inter-election period in which the survey is conducted? Answers to these points very much affect the uses to which expert surveys can be put. After a brief review of the way they have developed to date, this note discusses these problems concluding that they confine expert judgements to a fundamentally descriptive and static role rather than an analytic or dynamic one. From Left Right judgements to policy domains: the development of expert surveys Expert surveys developed out of the judgements made by individual scholars about the policy positions of West European parties, usually on a Left Right continuum These judgements were driven by the desire to explain government coalition formation through the policy closeness of parties which joined the coalition (Axelrod 1970; de Swann 1973; Taylor & Laver 1973). By administering a postal questionnaire asking experts in 16 countries to locate their national parties on a 10-point scale between Left and Right, Castles & Mair (1984) sought to balance out the biases inherent in such individual judgements by using the mean judgement of specialists to locate parties a brilliant innovation which produced results at once authoritative and easily accessible. As a consequence they have been widely used and quoted ever since (Mair & Castles 1997). What was in many ways a follow-up study based on a similar Left Right scale and methodology was carried through by Huber & Inglehart (1995) in the mid-nineties, for 40 countries including Central and Eastern Europe. Their innovation was to ask experts the criteria they based their Left Right judgements on (p. 78). Those nominated by specialists fell into ten categories ranging from economic or class conflict, the dominating one used by over 50 percent, to xenophobia, centralisation and new politics. These criteria are summarised in Table 1. The range of criteria used by experts raises questions about the exact nature not only of the Left Right locations obtained by these authors but also of those produced earlier. If specialists in one country base their judgements
3 EXPERT JUDGEMENTS OF PARTY POLICY POSITIONS 105 Table 1. The 10 broad types of criteria used by experts to place parties to Left and Right, Economic or class conflict 6. Xenophobia 2. Centralisation of power 7. Conservatism versus Change 3. Authoritarianism versus Democracy 8. Property rights 4. Isolation versus Internationalism 9. Constitutional reform 5. Traditional versus new culture 10. National defence Source: Adapted from Huber & Inglehardt (1995), p. 78. exclusively on party attitudes to democracy while those in another use only attitudes to nationalisation and privatisation of industry, will the resulting Left Right classification in the different countries be comparable? Worse, if half of the specialists in one country use democracy as a criterion for placements and the other half use different criteria, does the resulting mean party location rest on averaging bananas and oranges in policy terms? Huber and Inglehart are very honest in raising this question but do not really resolve it. The third major expert survey (Laver & Hunt 1992: 12) anticipated this difficulty by asking experts to locate parties on each of eight specific policy scales rather than on one overarching Left Right dimension. These are shown in Table 2. Each gives an explicit domain in which to make a judgement of location. The authors reason for getting judgements in each domain separately was to tap the multi-dimensionality of policy space (pp. 5, 45 46), so the survey also gave experts judgements on the salience of each dimension. In at least some national follow-up surveys done in 1997 the overall policy space reduces to a basic Left Right dimension, however (Laver 1998). The latest expert survey also taps into a specific policy domain party attitudes to European integration (Ray 1997). Having sketched the ways expert surveys have developed, we now consider, in turn, the methodological problems raised previously. These derive from ambiguities, possibly inherent in expert judgements, about exactly what is being characterised in policy terms, how and when. What party is being located? Laver & Hunt (1992: 124) asked their experts to place party leaders and voters separately on their policy scale a wise precaution, since what leaders advocate is not necessarily what voters support. Parties are complex organisations with many levels, from Parliaments through apparatchiks to activists. Other
4 106 IAN BUDGE Table 2. Policy scales used in the Laver Hunt expert survey 1. Taxes versus public services Promote raising taxes to increase public services. (1) Promote cutting public services to cut taxes. (20) 2. Foreign policy Promote development of friendly relations with Soviet Union. (1) Oppose development of friendly relations with Soviet Union. (20) 3. Public ownership Promote maximum public ownership of business and industry. (1) Oppose all public ownership of business and industry. (20) 4. Social policy Promote permissive policies on matters such as abortion and homosexual law. (1) Oppose permissive policies on matters such as abortion and homosexual law. (20) 5. The religious dimension Strongly anticlerical. (1) Strongly proclerical. (20) 6. Urban versus rural interests Promote interests of urban and industrial voters above others. (1) Promote interests of rural and agricultural voters above others. (20) 7. Centralisation of decision making Promote decentralisation of all decision making. (1) Oppose any decentralisation of decision making (20) 8. Environmental policy Support protection of environment, even at the cost of economic growth. (1) Support economic growth, even at the cost of damage to environment. (20) For each policy-domain, respondents were asked to locate the positions of party leaders and party voters, and to rank each in terms of the importance attached by the leaders of each party to it. Source: Laver & Hunt (1995), pp expert surveys have not specified what they meant by the party to be placed, 2 thus leaving in doubt whether it is leaders or other groups, or all of them, which are being characterised. The disadvantages in such ambiguity are illustrated in Ray, Scott & Steenbergen s (1998) attempt to relate party positions on European integration to their supporters opinions on it, and to check which influences the other. Their research design conceives supporters and party positions as separate and independent variables. This is certainly correct at a conceptual level. However, the measure leaves unclear the extent to which judgements of party positions were based
5 EXPERT JUDGEMENTS OF PARTY POLICY POSITIONS 107 on voters as against leaders, or activists, opinions. Ambiguity about the measure of party location introduces a potential tautology into the empirical research, depending on the (unknown) extent to which party locations are assigned on voters as opposed to leaders preferences. To the extent that party voters preferences are being related to party voters preferences (measured somewhat differently) the correlations are not especially illuminating. How are parties located by experts? Criteria for Left Right placements The terms Left and Right obviously mean something in political terms. But it is not clear if they mean the same thing to different experts. Huber & Inglehart s (1995) finding is that they could mean ten different things! It may be that the same criteria underlie the locations of parties when experts are asked to place them from Left to Right. But they may not. We do not know. This uncertainty should caution against making easy comparisons between different national rankings. It is easy also to conceive of the referents for judgement changing over time even within the same country. Laver, for example, alters his foreign policy scale between 1989 and From covering attitudes towards the Soviet Union it switches to attitudes towards Nato and the EU! (Laver & Hunt 1992; Laver 1998). Presumably experts making general Left Right judgements also changed their foreign affairs focus similarly over this time period. To the extent that foreign affairs enters into Left Right judgements such change of content would them non-comparable. Knutsen s (1998) comparison of party Left Right positions in 1982 and 1993 assumes quite uncritically that the experts judgements are exactly comparable. Against such a criticism it could be argued that the Left Right dimension is general, ideological and contentless an overarching spatial representation capable of incorporating a variety of salient political issues and conflicts but not specifically bound to any of them. This is possibly an implication which emerges from Mair & Mudde s (1998: ) distinction between party ideology as opposed to specific policy positions. If this were so the problem of different criteria underlying Left Right judgements would go away. One would expect their substantive meaning to change over time and possibly between countries. The research problem this would raise, however, is what referents Left and Right have if they do not relate consistently to certain policies? What point is there in comparing parties in terms of a common scale if they all stand differently on it? Closeness of location would not tell us anything about policy agreements if the
6 108 IAN BUDGE positions concerned were based on different substantive criteria for different parties, countries and time periods. As against this, most scholars who have applied Left Right distinctions in actual research have imputed a substantive policy content to them. We have cited earlier coalition literature. In terms of economic voting Hibbs (1977) and Anderson (1995) see Left parties as permanently concerned with employment and Right parties with inflation. Laver & Hunt (1992) associate Left and Right with support and opposition to public ownership. Klingemann, Hofferbert & Budge et al. (1994), from extensive analyses of post war party election programmes, find the Left consistently associated with state intervention, welfare and peace and the Right with freedom, tradition and strong defence. If Left Right positions are not policy-empty and do reflect real party preferences, then the varying criteria used by experts to characterise these positions is a serious problem. The ambiguity of resulting Left Right locations would render expert judgements unreliable as a measure of policy intentions. Locating parties in specific policy domains One way of reducing such ambiguity is to ask experts to locate parties in specific policy domains support or oppose public ownership, raise taxes and extend services, or lower taxes and cut services, anti clerical versus clerical, for or against European integration (Laver & Hunt 1992; Ray 1997). Focussing on a specific policy area should aid experts in applying the same criteria to each set of locations. There are, however, two problems with such specific policy judgements: (a) as noted above the dimensions considered relevant will change, rendering over time comparison of overall party positions speculative rather than authoritative (Laver 1998); (b) posing a closed question rather than an open question to experts makes the measure highly dependant on the original investigators judgement about what party differences really are. It is difficult to get clear judgements from experts on separate policy domains without posing hypothetical contrasts which parties actually spend a lot of time avoiding in their own declarations of intent. A prime example is Laver & Hunts (1992) contrast Taxes versus Public Services. Laver, himself, has noted that parties hardly ever advocate tax increases (Laver & Garry 1998; 11) an observation supported by abundant evidence from analyses of party manifestos (Budge, Robertson & Hearl 1987). The same applies to being against religion.
7 EXPERT JUDGEMENTS OF PARTY POLICY POSITIONS 109 What are we to make of such hypothetical policy contrasts? Of course, experts faced with the question will try to respond somehow (I have myself). Possibly they will look for guidance at whether parties have in fact increased taxes or cut services (or vice versa) in the past, administratively or legislatively. Possibly they will rely on the general reputation Socialist parties have of being profligate. The answer will have little to do with declared intentions, however, since parties notoriously avoid making such declarations. If intentions are what interests investigators, they would probably be better content-analysing documents which give the parties own statements of intent. Do expert judgements reflect intention or behaviour? If unrealistic contrasts between scalar opposites (Table 2) force experts into locating parties on the basis of what they have done, rather than what they have said, this imposes serious limitations on the extent to which expert locations of parties can be used to explain their behaviour non-tautologically. To put the case at its most extreme, characterisations of party behaviour as Left-wing cannot be used to explain their Left-wing behaviour. Stated so sharply this is an obvious tautology which investigators would avoid. Yet, as noted above, earlier analysts of party coalition behaviour probably fell into it through basing their own characterisations of policy locations on party behaviour (Axelrod 1970; De Swaan 1973; Taylor & Laver 1973). Expert judgements have also been applied to theories of coalition behaviour (Laver & Hunt 1992: ). To the (unknown) extent that party closeness has been judged by the experts on the basis of who forms coalitions with who, a similar tautology is involved here. Subtler forms of tautology also crop up deriving from ambiguous judgements made in more extended investigations of government coalition formation. A party may be characterised as centrist because it takes the important ministries in coalition with all sorts of other parties. Its central bargaining position may then be used to explain why it always gets these ministries (Laver & Shepsle 1996). Again, to the extent the party s coalition behaviour enters into the expert judgements there is a possible tautology, though we do not know its extent. This is the trouble with experts we do not generally know what the basis of the judgement is, though we may reasonably fear contamination between intention and behaviour. There is, it is true, a legitimate sense in which judgements of party behaviour for a past period could be used as indicators of initial intentions for the next time-period. The problem is that time periods are usually demarcated by elections at their beginning and end. Past behaviour is thus regularly super-
8 110 IAN BUDGE seded as a direct indicator of current policy preferences by new declarations of intention, the party manifesto or election programme. As these documents are regularly analysed and quantified they provide indicators of policy tied to a particular date whose referents are clear (Budge et al., forthcoming). What time-period? Nevertheless, expert judgements could be legitimately used in dynamic theories if one were sure that they were based on behaviour before the beginning of the interactions studied. Thus Castles and Mair s Left Right placements from could well be used to explain coalition formation in the late 1980s, if one were prepared to assume that party policy positions did not change much. However, Laver and Hunt s placements from 1989 could not be so used because they are probably based on the coalition governments and polices of that era and thus are not independent of them. This consideration renders the exact time period to which expert judgements refer quite crucial. It is unclear whether most expert surveys have specified the exact time point for which they want locations to be made. But Huber & Inglehart (1995) do explicitly ask for judgements of party position TODAY (block capitals in original). 3 How far, however, can experts be tied down to focusing on a specified time point by the mere question-wording? It all depends whether they are Downsians or ideologists in their approach to party policy making. Downsian experts may well characterise party location on the basis of the last manoeuvre by the party leadership. The party position is coterminous with its last policy package, which could be quite at odds with previous ones (Downs 1957). Ideologist experts on the other hand see the party as what it is rather than what it does (Mair & Mudde 1998: 224). Thus its present policy position is tied to its past policy position, e.g., on unemployment or inflation (Hibbs 1977; Anderson 1995). In assessing party policy positions today its post-war (if not pre-war) history has to be brought to bear. It is thus not clear what time span underlies the judgements of party position made by different specialists. What is clear is that it cannot easily be bounded by a simple change of question wording. The time period relevant to today s parties goes deep into the varying concepts specialists have of parties in the first place. A further complication is that surveys covering countries may elicit some judgements during an election campaign, which are thus keyed primarily to party declarations, and in others during an inter-election period based on actual party alliances and the behaviour of Government and Opposition. Laver and Hunt, for example, obtained their first set of British placements
9 EXPERT JUDGEMENTS OF PARTY POLICY POSITIONS 111 in 1989, mid-way between the elections of 1987 and A second set were obtained by Laver just after the General Election of 1997 (Laver 1998). How comparable are these judgements? We cannot say and neither can the investigators. The advantage of using election programmes as indicators of intention, on the other hand, is that they are comparable across time and space. Conclusions Expert surveys produce immediately usable locations for parties at a particular point in time which have made them popular for descriptive studies. They produce an instant snapshot of where parties are at one point in time. Unfortunately this snapshot lacks clear definition. The real virtues of expert judgements have encouraged an uncritical acceptance which overlooks their central weakness: We do not really know what they are judgements of. Are they about party leaders or party voters? the present moment, or past history? Above all, do they reflect party intentions or behaviour? If they are based even in part on behaviour they cannot be used to explain behaviour such as the type of party government which forms. Yet this is one of the main reasons why estimating party policy positions has become so important in contemporary political science. If expert judgements do not constitute pure measures of intentions and preferences they lose most of their analytic use. When judgements about policy location were extended from single individuals to the whole community of specialists, the implicit assumption was that these all had the same idea of parties, so that variations in individual judgements occurred within the same set of theoretical parameters. Both theoretically and empirically it seems that this assumption is incorrect. Experts use different criteria, which go back to their conception of what parties are in the first place. Differences on this point can hardly be controlled by elaborating or redesigning questionnaires. Ambiguities about what exactly is conveyed by expert judgements of party location are therefore likely to remain, and this severely limits their research uses. It is reassuring that the originators of the expert survey themselves have been entirely proper in their use of the judgements, limiting themselves in their recent retrospective (Mair & Castles 1997) to cautious comments about party polarisation. Huber & Inglehart (1995) are scrupulous in trying to check the basis of the judgements out. Unfortunately, the operational short-cut offered by the expert technique has misled others into an incautious extension of their use, which runs squarely into the methodological problems discussed here.
10 112 IAN BUDGE Notes 1. A parallel can be found with the general acceptance of multidimensional spatial representations of parties in the 1970s, based on electors perceptions of party closeness On critical examination these fell out of favour as being both non authoritative and unstable over time (Budge & Farlie 1978). 2. The questionnaire used by Castles & Mair is missing (1997, fn. 3). It is reasonable to assume however that it was not more complex than successor surveys. 3. Ray (1997) also deals explicitly with the time points judgements are solicited for, getting experts to locate parties between 1984 and This might raise questions about the reliability and independence of the retrospective judgements. But the time points for which judgements are invited are clearly specified. References Anderson, C. (1995). Dynamics of public support for coalition governments, Comparative Political Studies 28: Axelrod, R. (1970). Conflict of interest. Chicago: Markham. Budge, I. (1994). A new spatial theory of party competition, British Journal of Political 24: Budge, I. (forthcoming), Estimating party policy positions: From ad hoc judgements to theoretically validated standards, Essex Research Papers. Colchester, UK: Department of Government, University of Essex. Budge, I., Robertson, D. & Hearl, D.J., eds. (1947). Ideology strategy and party change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Budge, I. & Farlie, D. (1978). The potentiality of dimensional analyses for explaining voting and party competition, European Journal of Political Research 6(2): Budge, I., Klingemann, H-D., Volkens, A. & Bara, J. (forthcoming). Estimating collective policy preferences: Parties, governments and electors, Castles, F. & Mair, P. (1984). Left Right political scales: Some expert judgements, European Journal of Political Research 12: De Swaan, A. (1973). Coalition theories and cabinet formations. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. NewYork:Harper. Hibbs, D. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy, American Political Science Review 71: Huber, J. & Inglehart, R. (1995). Expert interpretations of party space and party locations in 42 societies, Party Politics 1: Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Klingemann, H-D., Hofferbert, R.I., Budge, I. et al. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Knutsen, O. (1998). Change in party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys, West European Politics 21: Laver, M. (1998). Party policy in Britain 1997: Results from an expert survey, Political Studies 46: Laver, M. & Hunt, W.B. (1992). Policy and party competition. London: Routledge. Laver, M. & Shepsle, K.A. (1996). Making and breaking governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11 EXPERT JUDGEMENTS OF PARTY POLICY POSITIONS 113 Laver, M. & Garry, J. (1998). Estimating policy positions from party manifestos. Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Warwick. Mair, P. & Castles, F. (1997). Revisiting expert judgements, European Journal of Political Research 31: Mair, P. & Mudde, C. (1998). The party family and its study, Annual Review of Political Science 1: Ray, L. (1997). Measuring party orientations towards European integration. Chapelhill, NC: Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina. Ray, L., Scott, D.J. & Steenbergen, M.R. (1998). Parties, constituents and the EU: The dynamics of representation and cue-taking. Paper presented to American Political Science Association Meeting, Boston. Smith, G. (1984). Politics in Western Europe. Aldershot. Taylor, M. & Laver, M. (1973). Government coalitions in Western Europe, European Journal of Political Research 1: Ware, A. (1996). Political parties and party systems. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Address for correspondence: Professor Ian Budge, Department of Government, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom Phone: ; Fax: ;
12
KNOW THY DATA AND HOW TO ANALYSE THEM! STATISTICAL AD- VICE AND RECOMMENDATIONS
KNOW THY DATA AND HOW TO ANALYSE THEM! STATISTICAL AD- VICE AND RECOMMENDATIONS Ian Budge Essex University March 2013 Introducing the Manifesto Estimates MPDb - the MAPOR database and
More informationDo they work? Validating computerised word frequency estimates against policy series
Electoral Studies 26 (2007) 121e129 www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud Do they work? Validating computerised word frequency estimates against policy series Ian Budge a,1, Paul Pennings b, a University of
More informationIs policy congruent with public opinion in Australia?: Evidence from the Australian Policy Agendas Project and Roy Morgan
Is policy congruent with public opinion in Australia?: Evidence from the Australian Policy Agendas Project and Roy Morgan Aaron Martin (Melbourne), Keith Dowding (ANU), Andrew Hindmoor (Sheffield) and
More informationPolimetrics. Lecture 2 The Comparative Manifesto Project
Polimetrics Lecture 2 The Comparative Manifesto Project From programmes to preferences Why studying texts Analyses of many forms of political competition, from a wide range of theoretical perspectives,
More informationCall for Papers. Position, Salience and Issue Linkage: Party Strategies in Multinational Democracies
Call for Papers Workshop and subsequent Special Issue Position, Salience and Issue Linkage: Party Strategies in Multinational Democracies Convenors/editors: Anwen Elias (University of Aberystwyth) Edina
More informationRe-Measuring Left-Right: A Better Model for Extracting Left-Right Political Party Policy Preference Scores.
Re-Measuring Left-Right: A Better Model for Extracting Left-Right Political Party Policy Preference Scores. Ryan Bakker A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel
More informationPolimetrics. Mass & Expert Surveys
Polimetrics Mass & Expert Surveys Three things I know about measurement Everything is measurable* Measuring = making a mistake (* true value is intangible and unknowable) Any measurement is better than
More informationTHE PARADOX OF THE MANIFESTOS SATISFIED USERS, CRITICAL METHODOLOGISTS
THE PARADOX OF THE MANIFESTOS SATISFIED USERS, CRITICAL METHODOLOGISTS Ian Budge Essex University March 2013 The very extensive use of the Manifesto estimates by users other than the
More informationBenchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings
Electoral Studies 26 (2007) 130e135 www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud Benchmarks for text analysis: A response to Budge and Pennings Kenneth Benoit a,, Michael Laver b a Department of Political Science,
More informationMapping Policy Preferences with Uncertainty: Measuring and Correcting Error in Comparative Manifesto Project Estimates *
Mapping Policy Preferences with Uncertainty: Measuring and Correcting Error in Comparative Manifesto Project Estimates * Kenneth Benoit Michael Laver Slava Mikhailov Trinity College Dublin New York University
More informationThis article was published in an Elsevier journal. The attached copy is furnished to the author for non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the author s institution, sharing
More informationESTIMATING IRISH PARTY POLICY POSITIONS USING COMPUTER WORDSCORING: THE 2002 ELECTION * A RESEARCH NOTE. Kenneth Benoit Michael Laver
ESTIMATING IRISH PARTY POLICY POSITIONS USING COMPUTER WORDSCORING: THE 2002 ELECTION * A RESEARCH NOTE Kenneth Benoit Michael Laver Trinity College Dublin 6 June 2002 INTRODUCTION Developments in the
More informationFrom Spatial Distance to Programmatic Overlap: Elaboration and Application of an Improved Party Policy Measure
From Spatial Distance to Programmatic Overlap: Elaboration and Application of an Improved Party Policy Measure Martin Mölder June 6, 2013 Abstract In contemporary representative democracies the political
More informationEMPIRICAL AND NORMATIVE MODELS OF VOTERS, PARTIES, AND GOVERNMENTS
EMPIRICAL AND NORMATIVE MODELS OF VOTERS, PARTIES, AND GOVERNMENTS Subject Area Political representation, Voter behaviour, Voting choice, Democratic support, Political institutions Abstract This workshop
More informationVote Compass Methodology
Vote Compass Methodology 1 Introduction Vote Compass is a civic engagement application developed by the team of social and data scientists from Vox Pop Labs. Its objective is to promote electoral literacy
More informationLong after it was proposed to be presented at IPSA 2014 World Congress it was approved for
Left-Right Ideology as a Dimension of Identification and as a Dimension of Competition André Freire Department of Political Science & Public Policies, ISCTE-IUL (Lisbon University Institute), Researcher
More informationWhen do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy
When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance Markus Wagner, Department of Methods in the Social Sciences, University of Vienna
More informationParty Competition in the 2013 Italian Elections: Evidence from an Expert. Survey
Party Competition in the 2013 Italian Elections: Evidence from an Expert Survey Aldo Di Virgilio, Daniela Giannetti, Andrea Pedrazzani and Luca Pinto University of Bologna Abstract In this article, we
More informationPartisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe
West European Politics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 1272 1294, November 2012 Partisan Sorting and Niche Parties in Europe JAMES ADAMS, LAWRENCE EZROW and DEBRA LEITER Earlier research has concluded that European citizens
More informationMeasuring party orientations towards European integration: Results from an expert survey
European Journal of Political Research 36: 283 306, 1999. 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 283 Research Note Measuring party orientations towards European integration: Results
More informationDo Parties make a Difference? A Comparison of Party and Coalition Policy in Ireland using Expert Coding and Computerised Content Analysis
Do Parties make a Difference? A Comparison of Party and Coalition Policy in Ireland using Expert Coding and Computerised Content Analysis Lucy Mansergh Department of Political Science Trinity College Dublin
More informationSample. The Political Role of Freedom and Equality as Human Values. Marc Stewart Wilson & Christopher G. Sibley 1
Marc Stewart Wilson & Christopher G. Sibley 1 This paper summarises three empirical studies investigating the importance of Freedom and Equality in political opinion in New Zealand (NZ). The first two
More informationWhich way from left to right? The issue basis of citizens ideological self-placement in Western Europe
Which way from left to right? The issue basis of citizens ideological self-placement in Western Europe Romain Lachat Universitat Pompeu Fabra mail@romain-lachat.ch August 2015 Abstract This paper analyses
More informationEXTRACTING POLICY POSITIONS FROM POLITICAL TEXTS USING WORDS AS DATA * January 21, 2003
EXTRACTING POLICY POSITIONS FROM POLITICAL TEXTS USING WORDS AS DATA * Michael Laver Kenneth Benoit John Garry Trinity College, U. of Dublin Trinity College, U. of Dublin University of Reading January
More informationparties and party systems
A/449268 classics Series Editor: Alan Ware University of Oxford parties and party systems a framework for analysis Giovanni Sartori with a new preface by the author and an introduction by Peter Mair contents
More informationWe present a new way of extracting policy positions from political texts that treats texts not
American Political Science Review Vol. 97, No. 2 May 2003 Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data MICHAEL LAVER and KENNETH BENOIT Trinity College, University of Dublin JOHN
More informationOWNING THE ISSUE AGENDA: PARTY STRATEGIES IN THE 2001 AND 2005 BRITISH ELECTION CAMPAIGNS.
OWNING THE ISSUE AGENDA: PARTY STRATEGIES IN THE 2001 AND 2005 BRITISH ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. JANE GREEN Nuffield College University of Oxford jane.green@nuffield.ox.ac.uk SARA BINZER HOBOLT Department of
More informationThe Sweden Democrats in Political Space
Södertörn University Department of Social Sciences Master s thesis 30 ECTS Political Science Spring 2011 The Sweden Democrats in Political Space Estimating policy positions using election manifesto content
More informationTHE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE EURO. Policy paper Europeum European Policy Forum May 2002
THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE EURO Policy paper 1. Introduction: Czech Republic and Euro The analysis of the accession of the Czech Republic to the Eurozone (EMU) will deal above all with two closely interconnected
More informationTowards a New Methodology of Estimating Party Policy Positions
Quality & Quantity 36: 55 79, 2002. 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 55 Towards a New Methodology of Estimating Party Policy Positions PAUL PENNINGS and HANS KEMAN Department
More informationAnalysis of public opinion on Macedonia s accession to Author: Ivan Damjanovski
Analysis of public opinion on Macedonia s accession to the European Union 2014-2016 Author: Ivan Damjanovski CONCLUSIONS 3 The trends regarding support for Macedonia s EU membership are stable and follow
More informationElectoral Studies 29 (2010) 308e315. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Electoral Studies. journal homepage:
Electoral Studies 29 (2010) 308e315 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Electoral Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud Why can voters anticipate post-election coalition formation
More informationHeather Stoll. July 30, 2014
Supplemental Materials for Elite Level Conflict Salience and Dimensionality in Western Europe: Concepts and Empirical Findings, West European Politics 33 (3) Heather Stoll July 30, 2014 This paper contains
More informationThe Centre for European and Asian Studies
The Centre for European and Asian Studies REPORT 2/2007 ISSN 1500-2683 The Norwegian local election of 2007 Nick Sitter A publication from: Centre for European and Asian Studies at BI Norwegian Business
More informationParties, Programs and Policies: A Comparative and Theoretical Perspective
Parties, Programs and Policies: A Comparative and Theoretical Perspective Ian Budge I. Policy and Ideology as a Unifying Research Perspective The feature of political parties which gives them their central
More informationWhat Are Elections For? Conferring the Median Mandate
What Are Elections For? Conferring the Median Mandate Michael D. McDonald Silvia M. Mendes Ian Budge Dept of Political Science Dept of Management & Dept of Government Binghamton University Public Administration
More informationDavid A. Armstrong II Curriculum Vitae 1
David A. Armstrong II Curriculum Vitae 1 Contact: Department of Politics P.O. Box 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201 e: armstrod@uwm.edu t: (414) 229-4239 w: http://www.quantoid.net Positions: 2009-Present Assistant
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationSubstance vs. Packaging: An Empirical Analysis of Parties Issue Profiles
Substance vs. Packaging: An Empirical Analysis of Parties Issue Profiles Robert Harmel (Texas A&M), Alexander C. Tan (University of Canterbury), Kenneth Janda (Northwestern University), and Jason Matthew
More informationEXTRACTING POLICY POSITIONS FROM POLITICAL TEXTS USING WORDS AS DATA. Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry * Trinity College Dublin
***CONTAINS AUTHOR CITATIONS*** EXTRACTING POLICY POSITIONS FROM POLITICAL TEXTS USING WORDS AS DATA Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, and John Garry * Trinity College Dublin October 9, 2002 Abstract We present
More informationDifferent Measures of the Ideological Positions of Political Parties: a Research Note from the Spanish Case
Different Measures of the Ideological Positions of Political Parties: a Research Note from the Spanish Case Luis Ramiro Fernández Researcher. Social and Political Sciences Department. European University
More informationEuropean Sustainability Berlin 07. Discussion Paper I: Linking politics and administration
ESB07 ESDN Conference 2007 Discussion Paper I page 1 of 12 European Sustainability Berlin 07 Discussion Paper I: Linking politics and administration for the ESDN Conference 2007 Hosted by the German Presidency
More informationThe future of abuse control in a more economic approach to competition law Meeting of the Working Group on Competition Law on 20 September 2007
The future of abuse control in a more economic approach to competition law Meeting of the Working Group on Competition Law on 20 September 2007 - Discussion Paper - I. Introduction For some time now discussions
More informationThe fundamental factors behind the Brexit vote
The CAGE Background Briefing Series No 64, September 2017 The fundamental factors behind the Brexit vote Sascha O. Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, Dennis Novy In the Brexit referendum on 23 June 2016, the British
More informationWorking Paper No 51, 2009
CIS Working Paper No 51, 2009 Published by the Center for Comparative and International Studies (ETH Zurich and University of Zurich) Is Left Right from Circleland? The issue basis of citizens ideological
More informationEconomics, environmentalism and party alignments: A note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies
European Journal of Political Research :, 2008 1 doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00831.x Economics, environmentalism and party alignments: A note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies RUSSELL
More informationThe EU as an International Environmental Negotiator - External Representation and Internal Coordination
Policy Brief 06/2015 The EU as an International Environmental Negotiator - External Representation and Internal Coordination Adapted from a paper presented by Professor Tom Delreux* at the 2015 Governance
More informationAPPLICATION FORM FOR PROSPECTIVE WORKSHOP DIRECTORS
APPLICATION FORM FOR PROSPECTIVE WORKSHOP DIRECTORS If you wish to apply to direct a workshop at the Joint Sessions in Helsinki, Finland in Spring 2007, please first see the explanatory notes, then complete
More informationUnderstanding Taiwan Independence and Its Policy Implications
Understanding Taiwan Independence and Its Policy Implications January 30, 2004 Emerson M. S. Niou Department of Political Science Duke University niou@duke.edu 1. Introduction Ever since the establishment
More information'Wave riding' or 'Owning the issue': How do candidates determine campaign agendas?
'Wave riding' or 'Owning the issue': How do candidates determine campaign agendas? Mariya Burdina University of Colorado, Boulder Department of Economics October 5th, 008 Abstract In this paper I adress
More informationIna Schmidt: Book Review: Alina Polyakova The Dark Side of European Integration.
Book Review: Alina Polyakova The Dark Side of European Integration. Social Foundation and Cultural Determinants of the Rise of Radical Right Movements in Contemporary Europe ISSN 2192-7448, ibidem-verlag
More informationWho Gets into Government? Coalition Formation in European Democracies
West European Politics ISSN: 0140-2382 (Print) 1743-9655 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fwep20 Who Gets into Government? Coalition Formation in European Democracies Holger Döring
More informationDo Individual Heterogeneity and Spatial Correlation Matter?
Do Individual Heterogeneity and Spatial Correlation Matter? An Innovative Approach to the Characterisation of the European Political Space. Giovanna Iannantuoni, Elena Manzoni and Francesca Rossi EXTENDED
More informationViktória Babicová 1. mail:
Sethi, Harsh (ed.): State of Democracy in South Asia. A Report by the CDSA Team. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2008, 302 pages, ISBN: 0195689372. Viktória Babicová 1 Presented book has the format
More informationA Proposal for Creating a Named Chair in Comparative Politics
A Proposal for Creating a Named Chair in Comparative Politics Dear Members of the Research Council, 13 January 2012 The Department of Political and Social Sciences proposes renaming the Chair in Comparative
More informationCOVENANT UNIVERSITY NIGERIA TUTORIAL KIT OMEGA SEMESTER PROGRAMME: POLITICAL SCIENCE
COVENANT UNIVERSITY NIGERIA TUTORIAL KIT OMEGA SEMESTER PROGRAMME: POLITICAL SCIENCE COURSE: POS 323 DISCLAIMER The contents of this document are intended for practice and leaning purposes at the undergraduate
More informationParty policy change. Exploring the limits of ideological flexibility in Belgium.
Party policy change. Exploring the limits of ideological flexibility in Belgium. Dr. Nicolas Bouteca (Ghent University) (Nicolas.Bouteca@ugent.be) Prof. Carl Devos (Ghent University) (Carl.Devos@ugent.be)
More informationYou Get What You Vote For: Electoral Determinants of Economic Freedom. Eric Crampton George Mason University
You Get What You Vote For: Electoral Determinants of Economic Freedom George Mason University First draft: April 2002 This draft: September 2002 Forthcoming, Journal of Private Enterprise Abstract: While
More informationRepresentation vs. Responsiveness: How ideology and votes shape party policy change
Representation vs. Responsiveness: How ideology and votes shape party policy change October 2009 Abstract: Parties in modern democracies represent specific groups of voters. They offer distinct policy
More informationThe policy mood and the moving centre
British Social Attitudes 32 The policy mood and the moving centre 1 The policy mood and the moving centre 60.0 The policy mood in Britain, 1964-2014 55.0 50.0 45.0 40.0 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
More informationCommunicating values left, right and centre: Creating consistent ideological identities through the communication of core political values
Extended abstract on paper (work-in-progress): Communicating values left, right and centre: Creating consistent ideological identities through the communication of core political values Purpose The purpose
More informationBachelorproject 2 The Complexity of Compliance: Why do member states fail to comply with EU directives?
Bachelorproject 2 The Complexity of Compliance: Why do member states fail to comply with EU directives? Authors: Garth Vissers & Simone Zwiers University of Utrecht, 2009 Introduction The European Union
More informationMeasuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File,
Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999-2010 Ryan Bakker, University of Georgia Catherine de Vries, University of Geneva Erica Edwards, University of North Carolina
More informationpaoline terrill 00 fmt auto 10/15/13 6:35 AM Page i Police Culture
Police Culture Police Culture Adapting to the Strains of the Job Eugene A. Paoline III University of Central Florida William Terrill Michigan State University Carolina Academic Press Durham, North Carolina
More informationWhat factors are responsible for the distribution of responsibilities between the state, social partners and markets in ALMG? (covered in part I)
Summary Summary Summary 145 Introduction In the last three decades, welfare states have responded to the challenges of intensified international competition, post-industrialization and demographic aging
More informationInfluencing Expectations in the Conduct of Monetary Policy
Influencing Expectations in the Conduct of Monetary Policy 2014 Bank of Japan Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies Conference: Monetary Policy in a Post-Financial Crisis Era Tokyo, Japan May 28,
More informationSHOULD THE UNITED STATES WORRY ABOUT LARGE, FAST-GROWING ECONOMIES?
Chapter Six SHOULD THE UNITED STATES WORRY ABOUT LARGE, FAST-GROWING ECONOMIES? This report represents an initial investigation into the relationship between economic growth and military expenditures for
More informationWhat makes parties adapt to voter preferences? The role of party organisation, goals and ideology
Draft Submission to B.J.Pol.S. XX, X XX Cambridge University Press, 2016 doi:doi:10.1017/xxxx What makes parties adapt to voter preferences? The role of party organisation, goals and ideology DANIEL BISCHOF
More informationPolitical Integration of Immigrants: Insights from Comparing to Stayers, Not Only to Natives. David Bartram
Political Integration of Immigrants: Insights from Comparing to Stayers, Not Only to Natives David Bartram Department of Sociology University of Leicester University Road Leicester LE1 7RH United Kingdom
More informationNomination: Arguments in Favour of "Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space
University of Georgia From the SelectedWorks of Cas Mudde 2013 Nomination: Arguments in Favour of "Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space Cas Mudde, University of Georgia
More informationEuropeanisation, internationalisation and globalisation in higher education Anneke Lub, CHEPS
Europeanisation, internationalisation and globalisation in higher education Anneke Lub, CHEPS Rationale Europeanisation, internationalisation and globalisation are three processes playing an important
More informationHungary. Basic facts The development of the quality of democracy in Hungary. The overall quality of democracy
Hungary Basic facts 2007 Population 10 055 780 GDP p.c. (US$) 13 713 Human development rank 43 Age of democracy in years (Polity) 17 Type of democracy Electoral system Party system Parliamentary Mixed:
More informationAnd Yet it Moves: The Effect of Election Platforms on Party. Policy Images
And Yet it Moves: The Effect of Election Platforms on Party Policy Images Pablo Fernandez-Vazquez * Supplementary Online Materials [ Forthcoming in Comparative Political Studies ] These supplementary materials
More informationThe Application of Theoretical Models to Politico-Administrative Relations in Transition States
The Application of Theoretical Models to Politico-Administrative Relations in Transition States by Rumiana Velinova, Institute for European Studies and Information, Sofia The application of theoretical
More informationAre representatives in some democracies more
Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions Matt Golder Jacek Stramski Florida State University Florida State University Although the literature examining the relationship between ideological congruence
More informationChapter 12. Representations, Elections and Voting
Chapter 12 Representations, Elections and Voting 1 If Voting Changed Anything They d Abolish It Title of book by Ken Livingstone (1987) 2 Representation Representation, as a political principle, is a relationship
More informationThe EU referendum Vote in Northern Ireland: Implications for our understanding of citizens political views and behaviour
The EU referendum Vote in Northern Ireland: Implications for our understanding of citizens political views and behaviour John Garry Professor of Political Behaviour, Queens University Belfast The EU referendum
More informationThe UK Policy Agendas Project Media Dataset Research Note: The Times (London)
Shaun Bevan The UK Policy Agendas Project Media Dataset Research Note: The Times (London) 19-09-2011 Politics is a complex system of interactions and reactions from within and outside of government. One
More informationCross-temporal and Cross-national Comparisons of Party Left-Right Positions
Cross-temporal and Cross-national Comparisons of Party Left-Right Positions Michael D. McDonald* Silvia M. Mendes Myunghee Kim Associate Professor Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Dept. of Political
More informationF851QP GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS. Unit F851: Contemporary Politics of the UK Specimen Paper. Advanced Subsidiary GCE. Time: 1 hour 30 mins
Advanced Subsidiary GCE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS F851QP Unit F851: Contemporary Politics of the UK Specimen Paper Additional Materials: Answer Booklet ( pages) Time: 1 hour 30 mins INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
More informationThe party mandate in majoritarian and consensus democracies
Chapter 5 The party mandate in majoritarian and consensus democracies This chapter discusses the main hypothesis of this study, namely that mandate fulfilment will be higher in consensus democracies than
More informationJAMES ADAMS AND ZEYNEP SOMER-TOPCU*
B.J.Pol.S. 39, 825 846 Copyright r 2009 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/s0007123409000635 Printed in the United Kingdom First published online 7 April 2009 Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response
More informationProblems with Group Decision Making
Problems with Group Decision Making There are two ways of evaluating political systems: 1. Consequentialist ethics evaluate actions, policies, or institutions in regard to the outcomes they produce. 2.
More informationCOALITION FORMATION. Hanna Bäck Department of Government Uppsala University
COALITION FORMATION AND THE INCLUSION OF GREEN PARTIES IN SWEDISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT* Hanna Bäck Department of Government Uppsala University Hanna.Back@statsvet.uu.se Abstract: In this paper I use unique
More informationPresentation given to annual LSE/ University of Southern California research. seminar, Annenberg School of communication, Los Angeles, 5 December 2003
Researching Public Connection Nick Couldry London School of Economics and Political Science Presentation given to annual LSE/ University of Southern California research seminar, Annenberg School of communication,
More informationJudicial Elections and Their Implications in North Carolina. By Samantha Hovaniec
Judicial Elections and Their Implications in North Carolina By Samantha Hovaniec A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina in partial fulfillment of the requirements of a degree
More informationUNDERSTANDING TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE AND ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS
UNDERSTANDING TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE AND ITS POLICY IMPLICATIONS Emerson M. S. Niou Abstract Taiwan s democratization has placed Taiwan independence as one of the most important issues for its domestic politics
More informationGeorg Lutz, Nicolas Pekari, Marina Shkapina. CSES Module 5 pre-test report, Switzerland
Georg Lutz, Nicolas Pekari, Marina Shkapina CSES Module 5 pre-test report, Switzerland Lausanne, 8.31.2016 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Methodology 3 2 Distribution of key variables 7 2.1 Attitudes
More informationLobbying successfully: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions and policy change in the European Union
Lobbying successfully: Interest groups, lobbying coalitions and policy change in the European Union Heike Klüver Postdoctoral Research Fellow Nuffield College, University of Oxford Heike Klüver (University
More informationLeft and Right in Comparative Politics
Left and Right in Comparative Politics Detlef Jahn University of Greifswald Abstract This paper takes advantage of the fact that party manifesto data are freely available. The reliable and transparent
More informationA new expert coding methodology for political text
A new expert coding methodology for political text Michael Laver New York University Kenneth Benoit London School of Economics Slava Mikhaylov University College London ABSTRACT There is a self-evident
More informationDemocracy and Common Valuations
Democracy and Common Valuations Philip Pettit Three views of the ideal of democracy dominate contemporary thinking. The first conceptualizes democracy as a system for empowering public will, the second
More informationStanding for office in 2017
Standing for office in 2017 Analysis of feedback from candidates standing for election to the Northern Ireland Assembly, Scottish council and UK Parliament November 2017 Other formats For information on
More informationParty Competition in Regional Elections. A Framework for Analysis
W WORKING PAPERS 295 Party Competition in Regional Elections. A Framework for Analysis ANWEN ELIAS Party Competition in Regional Elections. A Framework for Analysis ANWEN ELIAS Aberystwyth University,
More informationDo Ideological Differences Determine Whether Center-Right Parties Cooperate with the Radical Right?
Bridging the Gap Do Ideological Differences Determine Whether Center-Right Parties Cooperate with the Radical Right? Name: Samuel J. Jong Student number: 1166301 E-mail address: s.j.jong@umail.leidenuniv.nl
More informationParty Competition and Responsible Party Government
Party Competition and Responsible Party Government Party Competition and Responsible Party Government A Theory of Spatial Competition Based upon Insights from Behavioral Voting Research James Adams Ann
More informationThe uses and abuses of evolutionary theory in political science: a reply to Allan McConnell and Keith Dowding
British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2000, pp. 89 94 The uses and abuses of evolutionary theory in political science: a reply to Allan McConnell and Keith Dowding
More informationValue Orientations and Party Choice - A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Five Countries
Value Orientations and Party Choice - A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Five Countries by Oddbjørn Knutsen Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, and Staffan Kumlin, Department of Political
More informationTeaching guidance: Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics
Teaching guidance: Paper 2 Government and politics of the USA and comparative politics This teaching guidance provides advice for teachers, to help with the delivery of government and politics of the USA
More informationCivil Society Organizations in Montenegro
Civil Society Organizations in Montenegro This project is funded by the European Union. This project is funded by the European Union. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EVALUATION OF LEGAL REGULATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
More information