Liste de lecture. Forces et comportements politiques. Département de science politique. Université de Montréal

Transcription

1 Liste de lecture Forces et comportements politiques Département de science politique Université de Montréal 23 avril 2018

2 1 Opinions politiques Achen, Christopher H. et Larry M. Bartels. (2016). Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Althus, Scott L. (1998). Information Effects in Collective Preferences. American Political Science Review 92: Bartels, Larry (1996). Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40: Bartels, Larry (2008). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Blais, André, Gidengil, Elisabeth, Fournier, Patrick, et Nevitte, Neil (2009). Information, Visibility and Elections: Why Electoral Outcomes Differ when Voters are Better Informed. European Journal of Political Research 48: Broockman, David E., et Daniel M. Butler (2017). The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes : Field Experiments with Elite Communication. American Journal of Political Science 61: Converse, Philip E. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. Dans Apter, D., éd., Ideology and Discontent. Free Press, New York. Fournier, Patrick, van der Kolk, Henk, Carty, Ken, Blais, André, et Rose, Jonathan (2011). When Citizens Decide: Lessons from Citizen Assemblies on Electoral Reform. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Healy, Andrew J., Malhotra, Neil, et Mo, Cecilia H. (2010). Irrelevant Events Affect Voters Evaluations of Government Performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: Iyengar, Shanto, et Sean J. Westwood (2015). Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59: Jacobs, Lawrence R. et James N. Druckman. (2015). Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jennings, M. Kent, Stoker, Laura et Bowers, Jake (2009). Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined. Journal of Politics 71: Lenz, Gabriel. (2009). Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Political Science Review 53:

3 Luskin, Robert C., Fishkin, James S., et Jowell, Roger (2003). Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain. American Journal of Political Science 48: Mondak, Jeffery J., et Mary R. Anderson (2004). The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge. Journal of Politics 66: Page, Benjamin I. et Shapiro, Robert Y. (1992). The Rational Public. Chicago University Press, Chicago. (Chapitres 1 et 2 seulement). Markus Prior. (2010). You ve Either Got It or You Don t? The Stability of Political Interest over the Life Cycle. Journal of Politics 72: Soroka, Stuart et Wlezien, Christopher (2010). Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion and Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, et Robert S. Erickson «Dynamic Representation.» American Political Science Review 89: Tversky, Amos et Daniel Kahneman. (1986). Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions. The Journal of Business 59: S251-S278. Zaller, John (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2 É lections Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, et Garrett Glasgow. (2004). Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results? British Journal of Political Science 34: Bélanger, Éric et Nadeau, Richard (2009). Le comportement électoral des Québécois. Presses de l Universit e de Montréal, Montréal. Blais, André et Arianna Degan. (2017). L étude du vote stratégique. L actualité économique 93 (mars-juin 2017). Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., et Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago University Press, Chicago. Carnes, Nicholas et Noam Lupu. (2016). Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class. American Political Science Review 110:

4 Carsey, Thomas M. et Geoffrey C. Layman. (2006). Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 50: Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World s Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Dassonneville, Ruth, et Michael S. Lewis-Beck. (2014). Macroeconomics, Economic Crisis and Electoral Outcomes : A National European Pool. Acta Politica 49: Dinas, Elias. (2014). Does Choice Bring Loyalty? Electoral Participation and the Development of Party Identification. American Journal of Political Science 58: Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York. Duch, Raymond et Stephenson, Randolph T. (2008). The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Farrell, David M. (2011). Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Palgrave, Basingstoke. Gidengil, Elisabeth, Nevitte, Neil, Blais, André, Everitt, Joanna, et Fournier, Patrick (2012). Dominance and Decline: Making Sense of Recent Canadian Elections. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. Golder, Matt, et Jacek Stramski. (2010). Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 54: Jacobson, Gary C. (2017). The Triumph of Polarized Partisanship in 2016: Donald Trump s Improbable Victory. Political Science Quarterly 132: Jennings, Will et Christopher Wlezien. (2016). The Timeline of Elections: A Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 60: Kalla, Joshua L., et David E. Broockman. (2018). The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments. American Political Science Review 112: Lijphart, Arend (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Meguid, Bonnie M. (2005). Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategies in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99: Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and 4

5 Proportional Visions. Yale University Press, New Haven. 3 Participation politique Blais, André (2000). To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. Campbell, David E. (2006). Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape our Civic Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Dalton, Russell J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford University Press, New York. Franklin, Mark N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Gerber, Alan S. et Green, Donald P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Direct Mail and Telephone Contact on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94: Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., et Larimer, Christopher W. (2008). Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large Scale Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 102: Holbein, John B. (2017). Childhood Skill Development and Adult Political Participation. American Political Science Review 111: Inglehart, Ronald (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Karpowitz, Christopher et Tali Menderberg. (2014). The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Kostelka, Filip. (2017). Does Democratic Consolidation Lead to a Decline in Voter Turnout? Global Evidence since American Political Science Review 111: Mutz, Diana (2002). Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice. American Political Science Review 96: Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York. 5

6 Stolle, Dietlind et Hooghe, Marc (2005). Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate about the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science 31: Stolle, Dietlind et Michele Micheletti. (2013). Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Verba, Sidney, Scholzman, Kay Lehman, et Brady, Henry E. (1995). Voice and Equality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 4 Communication politique Baum, Matthew A. (2005). Talking the Vote: Why Presidential Candidates Hit the Talk Show Circuit. American Journal of Political Science 49: Bond, Robert M., Fariss, Christopher J., Jones, Jason J., Kramer, Adam D., Marlow, Cameron, Settle, Jaime E., et Fowler, James H. (2012). A 61-million-person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization. Nature, 489: Cappella, Joseph N. et Jamieson, Kathleen H. (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Chadwick, Andrew. (2017). The Hybrid Media System. New York: Oxford University Press. Chong, Dennis et James N. Druckman, (2007). A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. Journal of Communications 57: Cook, Timothy E. (2005). Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Entman, Robert M. (2004). Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Flaxman, Seth, Sharad Goel, et Justin M. Rao. (2016). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly 80: Gilliam, Franklin D., et Shanto Iyengar. (2000). Prime Suspects: The Influence of Local Television News on the Viewing Public. American Journal of Political Science 44: Hill, Seth J., James Lo, Lynn Vavreck et John Zaller. (2013). How Quickly We Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects from Mass Communication. Political Communication 30:

7 Iyengar, Shanto (1991). Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago University Press, Chicago. Iyengar, S. et Kinder, Donald R. (1987). News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Lees-Marshment, Jennifer (2014). Political Marketing: Principles and Applications. Routledge, New York et London. Marland, Alex (2012). Amateurs versus Professionals: The 1993 and 2006 Canadian Federal Elections. Dans Marland, A., Giasson, T., et Lees-Marshment, J., dir., Political Marketing in Canada, pp UBC Press, Vancouver. Mutz, Diana et Reeves, Byron (2005). The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust. American Political Science Review 99: Norris, Pippa (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Prior, Markus (2007). Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Soroka, Stuart, Blake, Andrew, Aalberg, Toni, Iyengar, Shanto, Curran, James, Coen, Sharon, Hayashi, Kaori, Jones, Paul, Mazzolen, Gianpetro, Woong Rhee, June, rowe, David, et Tiffen, Rod (2013). Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasters and Current Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science 43: Strömbäck, Jesper et Frank Esser (2014). Mediatization of Politics: Towards a Theoretical Framework. Dans F. Esser et J. Strömbäck (dir.), Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, pp Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke. Vavreck, Lynn (2009). The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Zaller, John. (1998). The Rule of Product Substitution in Presidential Campaign News. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 560: Psychologie politique Aarøe, Lene, & Michael Bang Petersen. (2013). Hunger Games: Fluctuations in Blood Glucose Levels Influence Social Welfare Support. Psychological Science 24: Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., et Hibbing, John R. (2005). Are Political Orientations 7

8 Genetically Transmitted? American Political Science Review 99: Amodio, David M., Jost, John T., Master, Sarah L., et Yee, Cindy M. (2007). Neurocognitive Correlates of Liberalism and Conservatism. Nature Neuroscience 10: Cesarini, David, Magnus Johanneson et Sven Oskarsson. (2014). Pre-Birth Factors, Post-Birth Factors, and Voting: Evidence from Swedish Adoption Data. American Political Science Review 108: Dodd, Michael, Balzer, Amanda, Jacobs, Carly M., Grusczyszyki, Michael W., Smith, B. Kevin, et Hibbing, John R. (2012). The Political Left Rolls with the Good and the Political Right Confronts the Bad: Connecting Physiology and Cognition to Preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., et Dawes, Christopher T. (2008). Genetic Variation in Political Participation. American Political Science Review 102: Fowler, James H. et Dawes, Christopher T. (2008). Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout. Journal of Politics 70: Fowler, James H. et Kam, Cindy D. (2007). Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism and Political Participation. Journal of Politics 69: Kuklinski, James H. et Quirk, Paul J. (2000). Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics and Mass Opinion. Dans Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., et Popkin, S. L., (dir.), Elements of Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Political Rationality. Cambridge University Press, London. Lodge, Milton, Marco Steenbergen, et Shawn Brau. (1995). The Responsive Voter. American Political Science Review 89: Lodge, Milton et Taber, Charles S. (2013). The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Lupia, Arthur (1994). Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88: Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, et MacKuen, Michael (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Mondak, Jeffery J. et Halperin, Karen D. (2008). A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 38: Oxley, Douglas R., Smith, Kevin B., Alford, John R., Hibbing, Matthew V., Miller, Jennifer L., Scalora, Mario, Hatemi, Pete K., et Hibbing, John R. (2008). Political Attitudes Vary with 8

9 Physiological Traits. Science, 321: Petersen, Michael Bang, Sznycer, Daniel, Sell, Aaron, Cosmides, Leda, et Tooby, John (2013). The Ancestral Logic of Politics: Upper-Body Strength Regulates Men s Assertion of Self-Interest over Economic Redistribution. Psychological Science 24: Schreiber, Darren, Fonzo, Greg, Simmons, Alan N., Dawes, Christopher T., Flagan, Taru, Fowler, James H., et Paulus, Martin P. (2013). Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS One 8: e Settle, Jaime E., Dawes, Christopher T., Christakis, Nicholas A., et Fowler, James H. (2010). Friendships Moderate an Association between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology. Journal of Politics 72: Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., et Tetlock, Philip E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Soroka, Stuart N. (2014). Negativity in Democratic Politics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 9