ALIANA BRODMANN E. von RICHTHOFEN 7 HAMPDEN STREET WELLESLEY, MA Phone: Verified Complaint. Parties
|
|
- Clifford McDonald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ALIANA BRODMANN E. von RICHTHOFEN 7 HAMPDEN STREET WELLESLEY, MA Phone: Aliana Brodmann E. von Richthofen Verified Complaint Parties. 2. Susan Mellen, Senior Clerk, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square Rm 1-400, Boston, MA 02108; 3. Jane Lewis, Assistant Clerk, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square Rm 1-400, Boston, MA 02108; 4. David Labadini, Clerk, Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square Rm 1-400, Boston, MA 02108; 5. Former Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts as Overseer of the SJC Clerk s Office John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square Rm 1-400, Boston, MA 02108; 6. Chief Justice Roderick L. Ireland of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, successor to Ms. Margaret H. Marshall as Overseer of the SJC Clerk s Office John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square Rm 1-400, Boston, MA 02108; Statement of Facts 1. On March 16, 2010 and subsequently March 18, 2010 I visited the Supreme Judicial Court Clerk s Office, after having telephoned in advance to advise that I wanted to review the file on my Application for Further Appellant Review (FAR) that had been denied. The reason for my review were significant irregularities and omissions in the SJC s electronic docket of the case file, as well as the marked unresponsiveness by the Justices to significant Motions and other critical submissions I had filed in support of Further Appellate Review. 1
2 Both on March 16, 2010 as well as March 18, 2010, the second time confirmed by the Senior Clerk Susan Mellen, the entire case file was declared to be inexplicably missing. The Assistant Clerk, Ms. Jane Lewis, who was present on March 16, 2010, suggested that Ms. Susan Mellen, the Senior Clerk, would call me when the file was located. 2. Since the Sr. Clerk never called me, I returned to the SJC Clerk s Office on March 18, 2010 with another person and asked the Clerk, David Labadini, who was present, for my file. When he stated that he couldn t find it and I asked him, where it could possibly be, he became angry and told me to leave, calling security to intimidate me into refraining from asking further questions about my unobtainable file. 3. Senior Clerk, Mellen, was again not present that day initially and only located by the security guard called by Mr. Labadini, who was very sympathetic and went looking for her. 4. Ms. Mellen s demeanor was markedly hostile and unprofessional, instead of helpful and apologetic as would be expected in any office when a file cannot be located. She told me that she did not know where the case file is, stating simply that it was inexplicably missing. We agreed that she would continue searching for it and contact me upon locating the case file. She never called back or contacted me in writing. 5. Subsequently I sent a letter to the SJC Security Office requesting information for the Reason security had been called to the Clerk s Office on March 18, I received a letter in response by the Chief of Security, stating that there was no record of any such call. 6. On June 29, 2010 I sent a follow-up Letter to the Clerk s Office by certified mail inquiring of the progress in the search for the missing file. This letter was not responded to. 2
3 According to Bruce Shaw, Director of Archives and Records Preservation at the SJC, whom I contacted regarding this matter, the only other time one single case file went missing was in 2005 when the SJC moved from its previous location to its present one. That file, he explained, was later found. He has no knowledge of any other files ever gone missing from the Supreme Judicial Court. This information left me all the more perplexed as to why my case file would be declared inexplicably missing. 7. On August 19, 2011 I finally sent a complaint to the Chief Justice Marshall as Overseer of the SJC Clerk s Office, to which Ms. Marshall s lawyer, Francis S. Moran Jr., responded on September 23, His response letter, while acknowledging that the file had gone missing, ignored the seriousness of the matter and was factually wrong. He stated that the Sr. Clerk attempted to reconstruct the file and that two documents remained missing. Copies of some documents he claimed to have been retrieved accompanied his letter. (Encl.1) 8. My review of the documents sent to me by Attorney Moran proved that not two but eight documents were missing, although some of them are recorded on the SJC s internet docket of the case. Importantly: some of the retrieved documents Attorney Moran sent missed significant parts and had clearly been doctored. Actually, by sending me the retrieved documents, Attorney Moran provided me with additional evidence of the mishandling of my submissions to the Court. The evidence showed not only mere mishandling that could be construed as oversight or negligence, but indisputably biased destruction and/or doctoring of documents that provided crucial evidence in support of my Application for Further Appellate Review, indicating unequivocal favoritism towards the corporate defendants in my case. Just one example: a Motion marked Urgent, which had been hand-delivered to the Clerk s Office on October 28, 2009 was included in Attorney Moran s retrieved documents marked November 05, 2009 and missing crucial attachments! 3
4 The fact, that this important Motion, that was to reach the Justices in time for their decisive session that day, bears a date of 8 days later than the actual delivery, proves that the miss-dating didn t happen out of negligence but deliberately. This improper date intends to show, should there ever be an investigation, that this document was delivered too late to be considered by the Justices at that particular session and therefore could not have been considered in their decision. My copy of this Motion bears the correct date as stamped by the Clerk s Office the day I hand-delivered the original: October 28, The verified copies in my possession (stamped by the Court) of the documents declared missing by the SJC Clerk s Office plus the partial and doctored documents provided to me by Attorney Moran provide indisputable proof of substantial and persistent favoritism towards the corporate Defendants by the SJC Clerk s Office instead of impartiality. 10. The eight allegedly missing documents are: 1. Facsimile March , 10:27 AM : Request for reasonable time to rebut no resp. despite follow-up call to Clerk s Office; 2. Facsimile +Mail April : Requesting Statement of Reasons for Denial no resp; 3. Hand-deliv. April : Re: Unresponsiveness to Letter of April and followup call requesting Statement of Reasons - no resp. 4. Mail: April : Re: Unresponsiveness to calls and Letters April 3. and April no resp. 5. Certif. Mail July : Petition for Special Review of Legal Standard / Was the proper Legal Standard Applied? no resp. 6. Certif. Mail September and calls Re: When to expect Decision on Petition for Special Review? filed July 14, 2009 no resp. 7. Facsimile October , 11:30 AM: URGENT Motion to Strike no resp. 8. Notice of Docket Entry Nov : Re: Inarticulate Notice / generic docket entry. 4
5 Of these eight allegedly missing submissions, seven included Requests for clarification, enlargement of time, a Motion marked URGENT, and an important public interest Petition by me on an often misunderstood legal question. All of these submissions required responses from the Court. None had been responded to. The eighth missing document is a revealing Notice/docket entry by Ms. Mellen (originating in the SJC Clerk s Office!), illogically explaining the mishandling of the Petition for Special Review of Legal Standard submitted by me July Eight of seventeen submissions in total represent almost 50% of the total submissions in my case as missing and not responded to by the Court, all of them significant and essential documents for the Court s Decision on the Application For Further Appellate Review and filed by me, with one of the submissions being of indisputable public importance, as it asks a fundamental and often misunderstood legal question, as proven in this very case, which therefore merits a decision by this Court: Was the proper legal standard applied to this Employment Retaliation Case by the Appeals Court? 11. The only logical assumption that can be made, given the evidence, is that my Application for FAR was so grossly mishandled by the Clerk s Office, that when a Review became imminent, Ms. Mellen preferred to declare the entire file inexplicably missing, rather than expose the evidence: a file devoid of the significant submissions that supported the Application for Further Appellate Review, as well as other submissions that addressed repeated violations of Court Rules of Procedure by the corporate defendants, such as past deadline filings and non-service of their submissions to the other party (me) as required. 12. The actions by Ms. Mellen and the SJC Clerk s Office not only violated my civil rights to due process of law, but prevented an important public interest decision to be made on the fundamental and often misunderstood legal question stated in the Petition for Special Review of Legal Standard/Was the proper Legal Standard Applied in this Retaliation Case? one of the two documents Attorney Moran verified 5
6 in his letter as missing. The subsequent declaration of the entire file as inexplicably missing upon impending review and the clerks attempts at intimidating me by calling security to prohibit me from insisting upon reviewing the file in question, suggest the high probability that the state of affairs in this case is not an isolated incident of favoritism at the SJC and therefore requires a broad investigation into the Clerk s Office s activities for substantial reasons affecting the public interest and in the interest of justice. 13. My letter November 7, 2010 letter to Chief Justice M. H. Marshall summarizing these points in response to Attorney Moran s letter was not answered.( Encl. 2) Neither was my reminder to her of On December 23, 2010 I related my complaint and Findings to Ms. Marshall s successor, Chief Justice Roderick L. Ireland. This letter, as well as two follow up letters were not answered by him or by anyone else at the SJC. (Encl. 3) 15. Significantly: The Appeals Court had improperly filed this Employment Retaliation Case under the sub nature: Employment Discrimination and decided it accordingly citing Rule 1: 28. Rule 1:28 indicating a ruling in line with the legal standard of the charges filed. 16. Upon my request to the Appeals Court to correct the filing of the Appeal, it was correctly entered under the correct sub nature: Employment Retaliation, but the erroneous argument and decision, given while it had been filed under Discrimination and decided under Rule 1: 28, remained standing and is in conflict with the stated Rule 1:28 (Appeals Court Docket). 17. Therefore a subsequent ruling to correct these mistakes on the Application for FAR or at least upon the following Petition for Special Review of the proper legal standard for Employment Retaliation/ was the proper legal standard for an employment 6
7 retaliation case applied? ( Encl. 4) by the SJC is important for the benefit of the public and in the interest of justice. 18. The status of substantial missing and doctored submissions in my Application for Further Appellate Review remains, along with the SJC s refusal to explain: 1. when the original case file went missing, 2. who last had it, 3. whether the Justices actually ever saw my Application for FAR and the subsequent Petition, 4. and whether the denials signed by the Senior Clerk were ever ordered by the Justices. This indicates a high probability that the denials issued had not been ordered by the Justices, particularly in light of the fact that a determinate and binding ruling by the highest Court was clearly merited here, as would have been appropriately recognized by the Justices of the SJC, had they seen the these documents as submitted in their entirety and un- obscured. The denials, as issued, indicate that the Justices never could have seen and thus denied Further Appellate Review, since it leaves my retaliation case as the only one, in which discrimination must also be proven in addition to retaliation, as was improperly cited by the Appeals Court and contrary to the statute. If not corrected, the conundrum that was to be avoided when the two offenses, Employment Discrimination and Employment Retaliation, were separated leaves the door wide open to mischief and capricious rulings, resulting in egregious civil rights violations, as in my case, and would call for changes to the existing statute of the Law governing these two different offenses. 7
8 Legal Grounds for Pursuing Charges 1. Legal Grounds for pursuing charges against former Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall as Overseer of the Clerk s Office of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts include, but are not limited to: Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution of the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same) ; Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under color of any law include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under color of any law, the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes, ordinances, or customs. 8
9 My written communication with Chief Justice Marshall began August and led to confirmation of Ms. Marshall s Culpability for misdeeds perpetrated in the SJC Clerk s Office by the Senior Clerk Susan Mellen. The misdeeds committed by Ms. Marshall as Overseer of the SJC s Clerk s Office include, but are not limited to: 1. Breach of supervisory duties; 2. Unresponsiveness to Complaints; 3. Tolerance of misdeeds perpetrated by the Clerk s Office of the SJC and particularly Senior Clerk Susan Mellen; 4. Refusal to investigate the misdeeds committed by Senior Clerk Susan Mellen; 5. Accessory to misdeeds perpetrated by Senior Clerk Susan Mellen: including, but not limited to Deliberate Destruction of Public Records; Interference with Due Process; Civil Rights Violations; Intimidation and Refusal to produce Public Records in violation of the Freedom of Information Act. Importantly: these misdeeds, as re-stated in my follow up complaint and Letter of November 7, 2010 to Chief Justice M. H. Marshall as Overseer of the SJC Clerk s Office, have remained uncontested by her, which together with the verified documentation in my possession establish the Evidence for pursuing charges. On November I followed up with a letter to Ms. Marshall substantiating the misdeeds committed in the Clerk s Office of the SJC. This letter, delivered to her in response to her lawyer s letter of September 23, 2010 relating to my complaint of August 19, 2010 has been left unanswered to date. On December 8, 2010 I sent a Reminder. This Reminder also remained unanswered. This unresponsiveness to the two Letters indicates that Ms. Marshall did not investigate my complaints against the Clerk s Office of the SJC as required, particularly given the seriousness of the complaints. It further suggests that Ms. Marshall not only knows and 9
10 tolerates the misdeeds committed by the Senior Clerk, but that she attempts to help cover them up and evade accountability by early retirement. Importantly: Ms. Marshall s actions and impenitence suggest a pattern of misdeeds routinely committed at the SJC of Massachusetts that significantly impact the civil rights of all US citizens, emphasizing the pursuit of these charges to be a significant matter of public interest. 10
11 2. Legal Grounds for pursuing Charges against Ms. Susan Mellen, Senior Clerk/ Clerk s Office of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts The legal grounds for pursuing Charges against Ms. Susan Mellen follow direct communication with Chief Justice Marshall, which began August and led to confirmation of Ms. Mellen s culpability in the misdeeds perpetrated by her and the SJC Clerk s Office. The violations committed by Ms. Mellen include, but are not limited to: Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution of the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same) ; Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under color of any law include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under color of any law, the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such 11
12 as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes, ordinances, or customs. Ms. Mellen s misdeeds include, but are not limited to: 1. Destruction of Public Records; 2. Interference with Due Process; 3. Intimidation and Refusal to produce Public Records in violation of the Freedom of Information Act. In addition, Ms. Mellen appears to have: 1. Suppressed significant Documents in their entirety or parts thereof intended for the SJC Justices; 2. Failed to docket Documents; 3. Falsified dates on Documents submitted; 4. Failed to communicate verbally or in writing as and where required; 5. Favored certain parties and allowed their repeated violations of procedural Rules and Regulations, such as unannounced late filings, non-service of copies of their Submissions to other parties when and where required, etc.; 6. Refused access to Public Records as required by the Freedom of Information Act; 7. Issued and docketed improper Orders and Notices 8. Intimidated certain parties to refrain from requesting access to public Records 9. Destroyed Public Records; 10. Declared Public Records inexplicably missing to evade accountability for her misdeeds These misdeeds, as stated in my complaint of August 19, 2010 and follow-up Letter of November 7, 2010 to Chief Justice M. H. Marshall as Overseer of the SJC s Clerk s Office have remained uncontested by her, which together with the verified documents in my possession establish the Evidence for pursuing charges against Ms. Mellen. 12
13 Importantly: Ms. Mellen s actions and impenitence suggest a pattern of misdeeds routinely committed at the SJC of Massachusetts that significantly impact the civil rights of all US citizens, emphasizing the pursuit of these Charges to be a significant matter of public interest. 13
14 3. Legal Grounds for Pursuing Charges against Chief Justice Marshall s successor, Chief Justice Roderick Ireland, as Overseer of the SJC Clerk s Office The violations committed by Chief Justice Roderick Ireland include, but are not limited to Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution of the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same) ; Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges,or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under color of any law include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under color of any law, the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes, ordinances, or customs. Chief Justice Ireland s misdeeds include, but are not limited to: 1. Breach of supervisory duties; 14
15 2. Unresponsiveness to Complaints about misdeeds perpetrated at the SJC s Clerk s Office; 3. Tolerance of misdeeds perpetrated by the SJC Clerk s Office and particularly Senior Clerk Susan Mellen; 4. Refusal to investigate the misdeeds committed by Senior Clerk Susan Mellen; 5. Accessory to misdeeds perpetrated by Senior Clerk Susan Mellen: including, but not limited to Deliberate Destruction of Public Records; Interference with Due Process; Civil Rights Violations; Intimidation and Refusal to produce Public Records in violation of the Freedom of Information Act. Importantly: Chief Justice Ireland s actions suggest a pattern of misdeeds routinely committed at the SJC of Massachusetts that significantly impact the civil rights of all US citizens, emphasizing the pursuit of these Charges to be a significant matter of public interest. 15
16 4. Legal Grounds for pursuing Charges against Ms. Jane Lewis, Assistant Clerk/ Clerk s Office of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts The violations committed by Ms. Lewis include but are not limited to Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution of the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same) ; Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under color of any law include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under color of any law, the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes, ordinances, or customs. Ms. Lewis misdeeds include, but are not limited to: 1. Civil Rights Violations; 2. Destruction of Public Records; 16
17 3. Interference with Due Process. Importantly: Ms. Lewis actions suggest a pattern of misdeeds routinely committed at the SJC of Massachusetts that significantly impacts the civil rights of all US citizens, emphasizing the pursuit of these Charges to be a significant matter of public interest. 17
18 5. Legal Grounds for pursuing Charges against Mr. David Labadini, Clerk/ Clerk s Office of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Violations committed by Mr. Labadini include, but are not limited to: Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241: Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution of the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same) ; Civil Rights Violations under Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242: Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the U.S. Acts under color of any law include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts of any official to be done under color of any law, the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes, ordinances, or customs. Mr. Labadini s misdeeds include, but are not limited to: 1. Civil Rights Violations; 2. Interference with Due Process; 18
19 3. Intimidation and Refusal to produce Public Records in violation of the Freedom of Information Act. Importantly: Mr. Labadini s actions suggest a pattern of misdeeds routinely committed at the SJC of Massachusetts that significantly impact the civil rights of all US citizens, emphasizing these Charges to be a significant matter of public interest. Conclusion All facts set forth in this Statement of Facts are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and all additional documents substantiating those facts are readily available for review upon request. Respectfully submitted, Aliana Brodmann E. von Richthofen 19
Case 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-01483-RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO Case No. CANDICE ZAMORA BRIDGERS, vs. Plaintiff, CITY
More informationFEDERAL STATUTES. 10 USC 921 Article Larceny and wrongful appropriation
FEDERAL STATUTES The following is a list of federal statutes that the community of targeted individuals feels are being violated by various factions of group stalkers across the United States. This criminal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DOYLE BYRNES, 6702 W. 156 th Terrace Overland Park, KS 66223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
More informationEmployee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure
ACAB R EMPLOYEE DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure [NOTE: Our legal counsel recommends we expand this procedure to
More informationCOMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND INTRODUCTION. unconstitutional and otherwise unlawful conduct directed at Plaintiffs individually and as
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF ) THE TOWN OF WESTPORT; and ) SUSAN BURKE PEDREIRA, ) TANJA RYDEN, EDMUND A. ROONEY JR., ) and JOHN REYNOLDS, Individually
More informationEMPA Residency Program. Harassment Policy
EMPA Residency Program Harassment Policy (Written to conform to Regents Procedural Guide 3/74; amended 9/93; 10/95; 9/97) CHAPTER 14: ANTI-HARASSMENT (6/05; 12/05) 14.1 RATIONALE. The purpose of this policy
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed 0//0 Page of Steven E. Harrison, Esq. (No. 00) N. Patrick Hall, Esq. (No. 0) WALLIN HARRISON PLC South Higley Road, Suite 0 Gilbert, Arizona Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:
More informationWillie Walker v. State of Pennsylvania
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-8-2014 Willie Walker v. State of Pennsylvania Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-4499
More informationNo. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County. James C. Hankinson, Judge. August 24, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D16-3763 TERRY G. TRUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Dixie County. James C. Hankinson, Judge.
More informationInvestigation Report. Complaint about a Saskatchewan Employment Act Adjudicator
Investigation Report Complaint about a Saskatchewan Employment Act Adjudicator October 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE COMPLAINT AND THE ISSUES... 2 FACTS... 2 ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS... 4 RESPONSE TO THE FINDINGS...
More informationFOUNDATIONS & BASIC COMMITMENTS
Employee & Third Party Discrimination and Harassment Complaint Procedure This procedure has been adopted by the Board in order to provide a method of prompt and equitable resolution of employee complaints
More informationThe 2013 Florida Statutes
Page 1 of 11 Select Year: 2013 6 Go The 2013 Florida Statutes Title IX ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS Chapter 104 ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES CHAPTER 104 ELECTION CODE: VIOLATIONS; PENALTIES View Entire
More informationCase 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 6:13-cr-00099-JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JAMES FIDEL SOTOLONGO, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationPOLICY STATEMENT. Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08. X Revised New Section: Corporate Compliance Number: 10.05
The Arc of Ulster-Greene 471 Albany Avenue Kingston, NY 12401 845-331-4300 Fax: 331-4931 www.thearcug.org POLICY STATEMENT Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08 X Revised New Section: Corporate
More informationDiscrimination Complaint Procedure
Discrimination Complaint Procedure Summary SUNY Delhi, in its continuing effort to seek equity in education and employment, and in support of federal and state anti-discrimination legislation, has adopted
More informationIf you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo, a class action settlement may affect your rights.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Martin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 1:16-cv-09483 If you were a borrower on a mortgage loan account held or serviced by Wells Fargo,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
More informationDon t just stand there...
Don t just stand there... Drawing by Ruth Meyers Laider Revised Edition, January 2014 A Candidate s Guide to the 2014 State Election Published by William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth Elections
More informationPROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT & DISCRIMINATION
References: Education Code 212.5, 44100, 66010.2, 66030, and 66281.5; Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, (20 U.S.C. 1681); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794); Title VI of
More informationRULE 5. Initiated Ordinance Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)
RULE 5. Initiated Ordinance Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12) 5.1 Certification of Compliance. Upon receipt of written notice from the director of city council staff and the city attorney certifying the proponents
More informationELDERSERVE HEALTH, INC. FALSE CLAIMS ACTS SUMMARY
FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT as amended, 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733 (FCA) FRAUD ENFORCEMENT AND RECOVERY ACT OF 2009 (FERA) PATIENT PROTECTION and AFFORDABLE CARE ACT of 2010 (PPACA) FCA Imposes liability on persons
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:16-cv-11024 Document 1 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EBONY ROBERTS, ROZZIE SCOTT, LATASHA COOK and ROBERT LEVI, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationConcluding observations of the Committee against Torture
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 29 June 2012 Original: English Committee against Torture Forty-eighth session 7 May
More informationFranklin Northwest Supervisory Union
I. Purposes The Franklin Northwest Supervisory Union is committed to providing all of its students with a safe and supportive school environment in which all members of the school community are treated
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 4:09-cv-03895 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/04/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JENNIFER MENDOZA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND A/N/F OF
More informationCity of Tacoma. Procedures for Public Disclosure Requests
City of Tacoma Procedures for Public Disclosure Requests Contact information: Public Records Officer City Clerk s Office 747 Market Street, Room 220 Tacoma, WA 98402 253-591-5198 BACKGROUND These procedures
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual SUBJECT: NUMBER: 1. Purpose of Regulations The South Dakota Board of Regents has a legal obligation to implement federal, state, and local laws and regulations
More informationG-19: Administrative Procedures Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Prohibited
G-19: Administrative Procedures Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation Prohibited REFERENCES Board Policy G-19 DEFINITIONS Complainant: An individual or group of individuals making a complaint. A
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-19-2007 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationSEXUAL HARASSMENT. Policy Statement of Policy
Policy 500-90 SEXUAL HARASSMENT 1. Statement of Policy The Board of Trustees of the Smithtown Special Library District is steadfastly committed to safeguarding the right of all of its employees to a working
More informationCase 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationSIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
SIERRA COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE No. AP3435 Discrimination and Harassment Investigations Date Adopted: 1/1/1983 Date Revised: 12/3/2010 Date Reviewed: 12/3/2010 References: 34 Code of Federal Regulations
More informationCHAPTER XIV DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEAL. Rule 14.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION - SUSPENSION, DEMOTION AND DISMISSAL
CHAPTER XIV DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEAL Rule 14.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION - SUSPENSION, DEMOTION AND DISMISSAL 14.1.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS (EDUCATION CODE 45302) A. A regular classified employee shall be
More informationTHE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
MAURA HEALEY ATTORNEY GENERAL THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE ASHBURTON PLACE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: (617) 727 2200 www.mass.gov/ago July 29, 2016 By Hand
More informationSTUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE: NON-ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT
STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE: NON-ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose 1.1 In order to operate effectively, all organisations need to set standards of conduct to which their members are expected
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,
More informationCase 1:18-cr DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CRIMINAL NUMBER: 1:18-cr-00032-2 (DLF) CONCORD
More informationArticle IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
NOTICE 10-01-13 The following By-Laws, Manual and forms became effective August 28, 2013, and are to be used in all Disciplinary cases until further notice. Article IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationEEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Summer --0 EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Judge Ramona V. Manglona Follow this and additional
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENT S PROPOSED GUILT-PHASE PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1098 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No.13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, )
More informationCase 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) The Gilleon Law Firm 0 Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel:.0./Fax:.0. dmg@mglawyers.com Steve Hoffman (SBN
More informationTO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA State of Georgia ) ) ss. County of Mitchell ) Notice to Clerk of Court: Return a copy of this document showing it has been Time stamped,
More informationCOMMITTEE OF INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
COMMITTEE OF INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Prepared by the Office of the General Counsel 109443 in conjunction with the Legal Rights Committee of the National Executive Council 12-1-2001
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29
Case: 1:13-cv-04152 Document #: 15 Filed: 01/27/14 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN CZAJA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-000-RLH-RJJ Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * CISILIE VAILE PORSBOLL, ) fna CISILIE A. VAILE, ) individually and as Guardian of ) KAIA LOUISE
More informationRepresenting Yourself in an Eviction Case
Appeals Representing Yourself in an Eviction Case In All Housing Courts If you lose your eviction trial and think you have a good case, you may appeal and have your case reviewed in a higher court. To
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 09-00121-01-CR-SJ-DGK GILBERTO LARA-RUIZ, a/k/a HILL Defendant.
More informationLAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY
LAW ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY Carl Ericson ICRMP Risk Management Legal Counsel State Tort Law Tort occurs when a person s behavior has unfairly caused someone to suffer loss or harm by reason of a personal
More informationRULE 4. Candidate Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)
RULE 4. Candidate Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12) 4.1 City Elective Offices 4.1.1 Qualifications for Office. The qualifications for city elective offices are as follows: A. Mayor. Denver Charter 2.1.1 provides
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)
Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435) Complaints The law prohibits coworkers, supervisors, managers, and third parties with whom an employee comes
More informationWHITE EARTH NATION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CODE TITLE 18 CHAPTER ONE PURPOSE, JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS
WHITE EARTH NATION DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CODE TITLE 18 CHAPTER ONE PURPOSE, JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS Section 1. Purpose The White Earth Domestic Violence Code is construed to promote the following: 1.
More informationCase 1:11-cv DPW Document 7 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-cv-11235-DPW Document 7 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MAX STRAHAN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES ROWLEY, ET AL., Defendants. C.A. No. 11-11235-DPW WOODLOCK,
More informationHINDERING APPREHENSION OR PROSECUTION FOR TERRORISM (N.J.S.A. 2C:38-4)
Approved 10/20/03 HINDERING APPREHENSION PROSECUTION F TERRISM () The defendant is charged with the crime of hindering apprehension or prosecution of another for the crime of terrorism, in that he/she
More informationCase 3:12-cv MAS-LHG Document 29 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 227 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:12-cv-02649-MAS-LHG Document 29 Filed 03/26/13 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 227 CUTOLO MANDEL, LLC Jeffrey S. Mandel, Esq. 55 Madison Avenue, Suite 400 Morristown, New Jersey 07960 Tel.: (973) 285-3048
More informationMONTPELIER POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTPELIER POLICE DEPARTMENT Fair and Impartial Policing Related Policies: Stop, Arrest and Search of Persons; Motor Vehicle Stops/Searches; Limited English Proficiency This policy is for internal use
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:11-cv-00101-L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SATERA WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (2)
More informationREPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU
E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU
More informationCIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:
. CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS: Advice for Persons Who Want to Represent Themselves Read this booklet before completing any forms! Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 THE PURPOSE OF THIS BOOKLET... 1 SHOULD
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual SUBJECT: NUMBER: 1. Purpose of Regulations The South Dakota Board of Regents has a legal obligation to implement federal, state, and local laws and regulations
More informationto redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.
MICHAEL D. SUAREZ ID# 011921976 SUAREZ & SUAREZ 2016 Kennedy Boulevard Jersey City, New Jersey 07305 (201) 433-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan Plaintiff, ANTHONY TRUCHAN vs. SUPERIOR COURT
More informationPlaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WILLIE NEVIUS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : Docket No. : vs. : : : COMPLAINT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ; : JOSEPH FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES 1. Advice and Guidance 1.1 It is strongly recommended that the advice and guidance of the Employing Authority be sought when any
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON CA A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF In the Matter of the Marriage of HAROLD S. SHEPHERD Petitioner on Review THE STATE OF OREGON CA A 138344 And Multnomah County Circuit SUSAN H.F. SHEPHERD, nka Susan Finch, aka No.
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 14 Article 13A 1
Article 13A. North Carolina Criminal Gang Suppression Act. 14-50.15. Short title. This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "North Carolina Criminal Gang Suppression Act." (2008-214, s. 3; 2017-194,
More informationCHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Formal administrative hearings are one of the options provided to a person who has significant (or substantial) interests that will be affected
More informationSuffolk. February 10, May 3, Present: Ireland, C.J., Spina, Cowin, Cordy, Botsford, Gants, & Duffly, JJ. 1
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:14-cv-00133 Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DIGNA O. QUEZADA CUEVAS, Plaintiff, v.
More informationFair Housing Sexual Harassment
Fair Housing Sexual Harassment Presented by Vicki Brower 2016 The Nelrod Company, Fort Worth, Texas Tangible Costs Liability Insurance Premiums Settlement Costs Average Jury Award: $1,000,000 Winning plaintiffs
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-23619-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MAINSTREAM ADVERTISING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
More informationDon t just stand there...
Don t just stand there... Drawing by Ruth Meyers Laider Revised Edition, January 2018 A Candidate s Guide to the 2018 State Election Published by William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth Elections
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed // Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq., SBN ADANTE D. POINTER, Esq., SBN MELISSA NOLD, Esq., SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Center Oakport St., Suite Oakland,
More informationCase 3:17-cv DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13
Case 3:17-cv-00071-DJH Document 3 Filed 02/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION [Filed Electronically] JACOB HEALEY and LARRY LOUIS
More informationChapter 4: DUTIES, ROLES, and RESPONSIBILITIES of TOWN COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION and BOARD of ADJUSTMENTS, and OTHER COMMITTEES AS APPOINTED
Chapter 4: DUTIES, ROLES, and RESPONSIBILITIES of TOWN COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION and BOARD of ADJUSTMENTS, and OTHER COMMITTEES AS APPOINTED This chapter delineates the duties, roles, and responsibilities
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D17-45
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DR. AMANDA SAUNDERS, Appellant, v. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Shanklin et al v. Ellen Chamblin et al Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN, DORIS GAY LUBER, and on behalf of D.M.S., and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION George David Fossyl, individually and as administrator of the Cheryl Fossyl Estate, Tonia Harris, and Martin Fossyl, C/o Alphonse
More informationHow to Run for Office in Massachusetts
How to Run for Office in Massachusetts Published by William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth Elections Division One Ashburton Place, Rm. 1705 Boston, MA 02108 617-727-2828 or 1-800-462-VOTE
More informationPeralta Community College District Office of Employee Relations th Street, Oakland CA (510)
Office of Employee Relations (510) 466-7252 1 Office of Employee Relations (510) 466-7252 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT: COMPLAINT AND INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES FOR EMPLOYEES AND STUDENTS
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss. SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION 2 CIVIL ACTION No. 1684CV00488-BLS2 PHILIP HYMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ORDER
0 0 MARY MATSON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES CASE NO. C0- RAJ ORDER On November,
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR TEACHERS NOTES OF GUIDANCE FOR RELEVANT BODIES 1. Advice and Guidance 1.1 It is strongly recommended that the advice and guidance of the Employing Authority be sought when any
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cv-13064-RWZ Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SIOBHAN WALSH ) ) Plaintiff ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) TELTECH SYSTEMS, INC. ) ) Defendant
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedure Manual
Office/Contact: Office of Human Resources Source: SDBOR Policy 1:18 Link: https://www.sdbor.edu/policy/documents/1-18.pdf SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedure Manual SUBJECT: Human Rights
More informationPOLICY HARASSMENT/ DISCRIMINATION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
POLICY 13.0 - HARASSMENT/ DISCRIMINATION/ EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 13.1 HARASSMENT POLICY. It is the policy of Shawnee County to promote and support the individual human
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-114 PER CURIAM. THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, vs. JONATHAN ISAAC ROTSTEIN, Respondent. [November 7, 2002] We have for review a referee s report regarding alleged ethical
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P. a California limited partnership; UMG RECORDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation; SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a
More informationCase 4:10-cv TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 4:10-cv-40257-TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 WAKEELAH A. COCROFT, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JEREMY SMITH, ) Defendant ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS C.A. No. 10-40257-FDS
More informationHIGH-PRESSURE GAS SAFETY CONTROL ACT
HIGH-PRESSURE GAS SAFETY CONTROL ACT Wholly Amended by Act No. 3703, Dec. 31, 1983 Amended by Act No. 4541, Mar. 6, 1993 Act No. 4625, Dec. 27, 1993 Act No. 4966, Aug. 4, 1995 Act No. 5184, Dec. 12, 1996
More informationState of New Jersey GOVERNMENT RECORDS COUNCIL 101 SOUTH BROAD STREET PO BOX 819 TRENTON, NJ
VINCENT P. MALTESE, Chairman COMMISSIONER SUSAN BASS LEVIN ACTING COMMISSIONER LUCILLE DAVY ROBIN BERG TABAKIN DAVID FLEISHER CATHERINE STARGHILL Esq., Executive Director State of New Jersey GOVERNMENT
More informationEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 8-1-2007 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TERRENCE BRESSI, Case No. Plaintiff, VERIFIED COMPLAINT. vs.
1 1 Ralph E. Ellinwood Ralph E. Ellinwood, Attorney at Law, PLLC SBA: 0 PO Box 01 Tucson, AZ 1 Phone: (0) 1- Fax: () 1- ree@yourbestdefense.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X GEORGE HOM, MEMORANDUM OF
Mikhlyn et al v. Bove et al Doc. 1762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X GEORGE HOM, MEMORANDUM OF Plaintiff, DECISION
More informationCOMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
ABRAHAM HERBAS, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. CITY OF SWEETWATER, a municipality within the State of Florida, Defendant. / COMPLAINT AND
More informationMineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies
Mineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies 1422 - NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Board of Education does not discriminate in the employment of administrative staff on the basis of
More informationCalifornia Association of School Counselors Ethics Committee Policies and Procedures Adopted November 12, 2007 Revised August 3, 2008
California Association of School Counselors Ethics Committee Policies and Procedures Adopted November 12, 2007 Revised August 3, 2008 I. Ethics Committee Section A: General 1. The California Association
More information2. During the complaint intake process, no questions shall be asked of a complainant regarding their immigration status.
Distribution: All Personnel Number of Pages: 1 of 11 I. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to comply with Public Act No. 14-166 and to provide a uniform policy to accept, process, investigate, take
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More information