UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION"

Transcription

1 Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION JOHN NICHOLS, aka JACK NICHOLS, v. Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CHERYL CRESON, STEVEN PEDRETTI, KEITH FLOYD, GEORGIA COCHRAN, CARL MOSHER, THOR LUDE, HAROLD BIXLER, and JOHN HALLIMORE, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (1 VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. ( CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. ( NEGLECT TO PREVENT INTERFERENCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. ( WRONGFUL EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION COMES NOW JOHN NICHOLS, also known as JACK NICHOLS, a natural person, appearing herein in his individual capacity, and sues the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; STEVEN PEDRETTI, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Deputy Agency Administrator and former Director of County Engineering of the Municipal Services Agency of the County of Sacramento; CHERYL CRESON, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as the former Agency Administrator of the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County; KEITH FLOYD, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as County Counsel for the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County; GEORGIA COCHRAN, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as the Director of Personnel for the Municipal Services Agency Complaint Page 1 Nichols v. County of Sacramento

2 of Sacramento of Sacramento County; CARL MOSHER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the current Director of County Engineering for the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County; THOR LUDE, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Chief of the Building Department for the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County; HAROLD BIXLER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as the Chief Building Official for the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County; and JOHN HALLIMORE, in his individual capacity and as the Manger of the Building Permit Counter for the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County, and hereby states: JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiff JACK NICHOLS is a natural person and, at all times material to this action, is or was a resident of Sacramento County, California.. Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO is a local government agency of the State of California.. Defendant CHERYL CRESON, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as the Agency Administrator of the Municipal Services Agency (hereinafter the MSA. Defendant CRESON is sued both in her individual capacity, as well as in her official capacity as the Agency Administrator of the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant CRESON acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant STEVEN PEDRETTI, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as the former Director of County Engineering of the MSA. Defendant PEDRETTI is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as the Deputy Agency Administrator of the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant PEDRETTI acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant KEITH FLOYD, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as Deputy County Counsel assigned to the MSA. Defendant FLOYD is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as Deputy County Counsel assigned to the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant FLOYD acted as an investigator of the acts of official corruption alleged by plaintiff, the reporting of which resulted in plaintiff s termination of Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

3 his employment.. Defendant GEORGIA COCHRAN, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as Personnel Director for the MSA. Defendant COCHRAN is sued both in her individual capacity, as well as in her official capacity as Personnel Director for the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant COCHRAN acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant CARL MOSHER, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as the Director of County Engineering for the MSA. Defendant MOSHER is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as the current Director of General Services for the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant MOSHER acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant THOR LUDE, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as Chief of the Building Department for the MSA. Defendant LUDE is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as Chief of the Building Department for the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant LUDE acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant HAROLD BIXLER, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as the Chief Building Official for the MSA. Defendant BIXLER is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as the Chief Building Official for the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant BIXLER acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Defendant JOHN HALLIMORE, at all times herein alleged, was employed by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO as the Manager of the Building Permit Counter for the MSA. Defendant HALLIMORE is sued both in his individual capacity, as well as in his official capacity as the Manager of the Building Permit Counter for the MSA. At all times alleged herein, defendant HALLIMORE acted as the manager of plaintiff s employment by the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and herein alleges, that there are other persons, whose Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

4 identities are not known to him as of the time of the filing of this complaint, and who have participated as defendant parties to the misconduct alleged herein and who are therefore jointly and severally liable to the plaintiff pursuant to those causes of action. Therefore, plaintiff reserves the right to amend his complaint to state the identities of those individuals and join them as defendants, once their identities have been ascertained.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and herein alleges, that he may know the identities of certain persons who may be jointly and severally liable for misconduct herein alleged, but that plaintiff does not have sufficient information at this time to determine their liability in this matter and name them as defendants herein. Therefore, plaintiff reserves the right to amend his complaint to state the identities of those individuals and join them as defendants, once their liability for misconduct has been ascertained.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges at all times mentioned herein, that each defendant named herein was the agent and employee of each of the remaining defendants and, in doing the things herein alleged, were acting within the course and scope of such agency.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges at all times mentioned herein, that each defendant herein permitted his or her executives, managers, supervisors, agents, contractors, and other employees to commit all of the acts alleged herein and ratified their conduct.. Legal remedies for the plaintiff accrued in Sacramento County, California, as a direct result of acts of the defendants in Sacramento County, California. Therefore, the proper venue for this action is the Eastern District of California, pursuant to U.S.C. 1(b.. This is an action arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. Furthermore, this is an action where all the parties either reside or are employed within the County of Sacramento, California. Therefore, this court may assert both personal jurisdiction of the parties, as well as subject matter jurisdiction of the action under U.S.C. 1,, and of the entirety of this action. GENERAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS. From on or about March to January, 0, plaintiff was employed by defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO (hereinafter COUNTY as a Supervising Building Inspector with Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

5 responsibility for the supervision of various building inspections within said COUNTY.. On or about January, 0, plaintiff met with defendant STEVEN PEDRETTI and Deputy County Counsel, KEITH FLOYD. At that meeting, and in subsequent meetings, telephone conversations, and other communications, plaintiff informed Mr. PEDRETTI and Mr. FLOYD of corruption and other improprieties plaintiff had discovered in the Sacramento County Building Inspection Division. Among the corrupt activities reported by plaintiff were the following: a. That building inspectors employed by the defendant COUNTY and their Building Inspection Division were providing favorable treatment of the subjects of building inspections in consideration of a donation paid by the inspection subjects to a charity allegedly operated by the inspectors known as the Red Tag Breakfast Club; b. That building inspectors employed by the defendant COUNTY received hundreds of thousands of dollars of donations in cash and other valuable property in exchange for favorable treatment during building inspections conducted by the inspectors; c. That large amounts of the cash and other property collected by building inspectors in exchange for favorable treatment during building inspections conducted by them, constituting a total value of approximately Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($00,000.00, went missing and unaccounted for; d. That cash and valuable property collected by building inspectors in exchange for favorable treatment during building inspections conducted by them was used by the defendants and/or their agents for personal use in violation of the public trust and to fund illegal activities; e. That persons employed by the COUNTY were used to intimidate witnesses and to frustrate a public reporting of the illegal activities reported by plaintiff; f. That certain individuals who were responsible for illegally obtaining and misusing funds from the subjects of building inspections in exchange for favorable treatment during building inspections were rewarded for their illegal activities by a paid severance of their employment with defendant COUNTY; Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

6 g. That public funds were misused, particularly monies deposited in the Very Low Income Housing Fund administered by the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter the SHRA, for the development of certain parcels of commercial real estate, where those moneys were obtained for the benefit of private development interests who themselves were the beneficiaries of certain unlawful acts perpetrated on their behalves by the defendant COUNTY and their agents, namely the targeting of certain real properties for redevelopment and the condemnation of those properties without affording due process to the subject property owners or adequate compensation for the taking of their properties; and that subject commercial property owners were also restricted from owning property and operating their businesses on that property in the COUNTY s jurisdiction for several years as a consequence of the defendants illegal actions; h. That certain retired building inspectors, some of whom had retired with paid severance as a consequence of their unlawful activities on behalf of the Red Tag Breakfast Club, had gone into private business charging a fee for advice given by them to certain business owners, who were the potential targets of unlawful building inspections, for advice as to how those property owners might avoid an adverse building inspection, and then used their influence and the payment of some of the monies received from their property owner clients to bribe building inspectors and persuade them to avoid citing the property owner for building code violations.. At or about the time of the January nd meeting, and out of an abundance of caution, plaintiff initiated an inquiry of Mr. PEDRETTI and Mr. FLOYD whether plaintiff was required to disclose three services provided to him by separate business entities operating in the County of Sacramento on his statement of economic interest forms. As a consequence of this inquiry, on or about September, 0, defendant COUNTY determined that plaintiff should have made those disclosures and imposed a six-month temporary demotion on plaintiff to the position of Building Inspector II.. Plaintiff appealed the temporary demotion to the Civil Service Commission. The Civil Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

7 Service Commission upheld the temporary demotion - in significant part due to the Commission s determination that plaintiff, after serving the six-month demotion, would be able to...return to his prior duties... and reinstated in his former position as a Supervising Building Inspector.. On or about September, 0, plaintiff completed his temporary demotion; however, although he regained his title of Supervising Building Inspector of Complaints and Violations, plaintiff was not returned to the duties of that position as promised by the COUNTY s Civil Service Commission. Instead, plaintiff was placed behind the public counter in the County s building permit office rather than reinstated to his supervisorial duties. Defendants, and each of them, including those defendants whose identities or liability remain unknown to plaintiff, failed and refused, and continue to fail and refuse to reinstate plaintiff to his original work assignment. Moreover, the defendants created a new duty statement for plaintiff which essentially relegated plaintiff to the same duties he held during the temporary demotion. In the meantime, Plaintiff s actual position as Supervising Building Inspector of Complaints and Violations was filled by another County employee.. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that defendants, and each of them, including defendants whose identities or liability have not yet been determined, retaliated against plaintiff for disclosing his knowledge of corruption within the Sacramento Building Inspection Division by refusing to reinstate Mr. Nichols in his position as Supervising Building Inspector and permanently removing him from his job duties, and by misleading the Civil Service Commission concerning the temporary nature of the discipline imposed against him. The permanent removal of plaintiff from the position of Supervising Building Inspector of Complaints and Violations served to ensure that plaintiff would not be in a position to discover and disclose further improprieties that County employees may practice in the future.. On or about September, 0, plaintiff submitted a report to the Sacramento County Grand Jury which disclosed various acts of illegal activities, improprieties and corruption within the Sacramento County Building Inspection Division he uncovered while employed as a Supervising Building Inspector, including those alleged herein. As a result, plaintiff testified three times before the Grand Jury, most recently on October, 0. During the week of November, 0 several Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

8 employees of the Building Inspection Unit, including plaintiff s immediate supervisor, JOHN HALLIMORE, and his former supervisor, defendant HARROLD BIXLER, were called to testify before the Grand Jury.. On or about November, 0, and as a direct consequence of plaintiff s disclosure of public corruption in the Municipal Services Agency of Sacramento County, plaintiff was served by the defendant, County of Sacramento, with a second notice of disciplinary action proposing his termination from County employment. Even though none of the allegations stated in the second notice of disciplinary action were true, correct, or warranted employment discipline, plaintiff was immediately placed on administrative leave. Thereafter, on or about January, 0, plaintiff s employment with defendant COUNTY was terminated. First Cause of Action VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. for damages as to defendants County, Creson, Pedretti, and Floyd. Plaintiff restates and re-alleges the foregoing general factual and jurisdictional allegations and incorporates them herein as though fully set forth.. Defendants, and each of them, violated plaintiff s civil rights when defendants, acting under color of a statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of California or County of Sacramento, subjected, or cause to be subjected, plaintiff to the deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States under the First Amendment thereto, namely the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances, when they or their coconspirators terminated plaintiff s employment with the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO because plaintiff had reported the defendants illegal activities alleged herein, among others, to the Sacramento County Grand Jury, as well as to other COUNTY representatives and law enforcement officials.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered compensatory damages for lost future income in an amount to be proved.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered general damages as a consequence of emotional distress caused by the defendants Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

9 intentional, malicious, reckless, and oppressive misconduct.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter the future unlawful conduct of the defendants. 0. Plaintiff has been required to employ the undersigned attorney to bring this action on his behalf and is obligated to compensate his attorney reasonably. Therefore, as a consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to the payment of his attorney s fees for prosecuting this action. Second Cause of Action CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. for damages as to defendants County, Creson, Pedretti, and Floyd 1. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege the foregoing general factual and jurisdictional allegations and incorporate them herein as though fully set forth.. Defendants, and each of them, violated plaintiff s civil rights when defendants, acting under color of a statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of California or County of Sacramento, conspired to subject, or cause to be subjected, plaintiff to the deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States under the First Amendment thereto, namely the right to petition the government for the redress of grievances, when they or their co-conspirators terminated plaintiff s employment with the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO because plaintiff had reported the defendants illegal activities alleged herein, among others, to the Sacramento County Grand Jury, as well as to other COUNTY representatives and law enforcement officials.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered compensatory damages for lost future income in an amount to be proved.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered general damages as a consequence of emotional distress caused by the defendants intentional, malicious, reckless, and oppressive misconduct.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter the future unlawful conduct of the defendants. Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

10 . Plaintiff has been required to employ the undersigned attorney to bring this action on his behalf and is obligated to compensate his attorney reasonably. Therefore, as a consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to the payment of his attorney s fees for prosecuting this action. Third Cause of Action NEGLECT TO PREVENT INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS ( U.S.C. for damages as to all defendants. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege the foregoing general factual and jurisdictional allegations and incorporate them herein as though fully set forth.. Defendants, and each of them, violated plaintiff s civil rights when defendants, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in Section of Title of the United States Code to wit, subjecting plaintiff to the deprivation of his right to petition the government for the redress of grievances were about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglected or refused to do so.. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered compensatory damages for lost future income in an amount to be proved. 0. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter the future unlawful conduct of the defendants. 1. As a proximate consequence of defendants violation of plaintiff s civil rights, plaintiff suffered general damages as a consequence of emotional distress caused by the defendants malicious, reckless, and oppressive misconduct.. Plaintiff has been required to employ the undersigned attorney to bring this action on his behalf and is obligated to compensate his attorney reasonably. Therefore, as a consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to the payment of his attorney s fees for prosecuting this action. // // Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

11 // FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Employment Termination in Violation of Public Policy (Cal. Labor Code sections 0. and 0 for damages as to defendants County, Creson, Pedretti, and Floyd. Plaintiffs restate and re-allege the foregoing general factual and jurisdictional allegations and incorporate them herein as though fully set forth.. The actions of defendants, and each of them, including any defendants whose identities or liability is yet unknown to plaintiff, as set forth above, were taken in retaliation for plaintiff s reporting of illegal and corrupt activities within the Municipal Services Agency for defendant County of Sacramento. The defendants conduct occurred in violation of Labor Code section 0., for which damages are recoverable under Labor Code section 0.. As a proximate result of defendants conduct as described in paragraphs through above, and in violation of Public Policy as set forth in Labor Code Section 0., defendants, and each of them, including unnamed defendants whose identifies or liability has not yet been determined, terminated plaintiff s employment.. As a proximate result of defendants, and each of their conduct, including unnamed defendants not yet identified, plaintiff has suffered harm, including lost earnings, and other employment benefits, humiliation, embarrassment and mental anguish all to his damage in an amount to be established at trial (but, in any event, damages that far exceed the legally required amount of $, In doing the acts set forth above, defendants, and each of them, including unnamed defendants not yet identified, knew that Labor Code Section 0. protected plaintiff when disclosing illegal and corrupt activities within the County of Sacramento s Building Inspection Division, and that retaliation against plaintiff as a result of these disclosures is unlawful. Notwithstanding this knowledge, defendants, and each of them, including unnamed defendants whose identities or liability has not yet been determined, subjected plaintiff to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of plaintiff s rights by terminating his employment. Such conduct Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

12 warrants assessment of punitive damages against all individual defendants currently named, as well as all individual unnamed defendants who have not yet been identified and who may subsequently be added to this suit.. On or about November, 0, plaintiff timely filed a claim against the County of Sacramento alleging the facts as set forth in this complaint. Attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference, is a true and correct copy of plaintiff s claim against the County of Sacramento.. On or about December, 0, defendant, County of Sacramento issued a Notice of Rejection of Claim. Attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, is a true and correct copy of the Notice of Rejection of Claim. 0. Plaintiff has been required to employ the undersigned attorney to bring this action on his behalf and is obligated to compensate his attorney reasonably. Therefore, as a consequence of defendants violation of his civil rights, plaintiff is entitled to the payment of his attorney s fees for prosecuting this action. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1. For the proof of his claims, plaintiff demands a jury trial in all his causes of action. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE plaintiffs pray for this Honorable Court to enter an Order awarding him Judgment in this action and for the following relief: 1. Compensatory damages for lost future income in an amount to be proved at trial;. General damages for emotional distress in an amount to be proved at trial as a consequence of the defendants intentional, reckless, malicious, and oppressive misconduct.. Exemplary damages in an amount in an amount to be proved at trial against all the defendants, who are jointly and severally liable therefore as a consequence of their reckless, malicious, or intentional wrongdoing, and/or because of the violation of important public policies protecting persons from the deprivation of their right to petition the government for the redress of their grievances.. Prejudgment interest in an amount to be proved. Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

13 . Plaintiff s litigation costs.. Reasonable attorney s fees. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: December, 0 THE LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. /s/ Anthony J. Palik Anthony J. Palik, Esq. ## Complaint Page Nichols v. County of Sacramento

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it 0 0 the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES -0 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it without notice or a hearing, as Michael Lee first learned at the hearing on his motion for the return of his

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:18-cv-00445-PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 MARK L. SHURTLEFF (USB 4666) SHURTLEFF LAW FIRM, PC P.O. Box 900873 Sandy, Utah 84090 (801) 441-9625 mark@shurtlefflawfirm.com Attorney for

More information

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Case 1:16-cv-00628 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 KIMBERLY PERREAULT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO. 650457/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DAS COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Case 1:16-cv-00629 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 LINDA FERRAGAMO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually

More information

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of

More information

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 Case: 1:17-cv-03627 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/12/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DISTRICT JOHN ADAM JONES, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) 17

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LEO HARDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. ) CITY OF MILWAUKEE, EDWARD FLYNN ) OFFICER MICHAEL GASSER, ) OFFICER KEITH GARLAND, JR. ) and unknown

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:17-cv-13241-BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/03/17 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SHARON STEIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN

More information

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION Case 2:10-cv-01141-HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CITY OF COVINGTON, RICHARD PALMISANO, JACK WEST,

More information

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:18-cv-05171-JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 Beilal Chatila (SBN 314413 CHATILA LAW, LLP 306 40th Street, Suite C Oakland, CA 94609 Ph: (888 567-9990 Anthony J. Palik (SBN 190971 LAW OFFICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV Case 1:13-cv-00674-ACK-RLP Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242 255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-1108 Facsimile:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JULIE MCARDLE ) ) Plaintiff ) ) Case No. 09 v. ) ) JURY DEMAND PEORIA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 150, ) an Illinois Local Governmental

More information

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:12-cv WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-40120-WGY Document 6 Filed 10/04/12 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRCT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ROBERTO CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Case 1:17-cv-01654-MHC Document 1-2 Filed 05/08/17 Page 1 of 10 CHUCK FOSTER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHER DISTRICT OF GEORGIA Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. vs. CHEROKEE COUNTY, ASHLEY

More information

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 Case: 1:13-cv-05315 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN BUENO, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, )

More information

Plaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the

Plaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WILLIE NEVIUS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : Docket No. : vs. : : : COMPLAINT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ; : JOSEPH FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 0) dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 00 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 0 Woodland Hills, California Telephone:

More information

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:19-cv Document 1 Filed 01/30/19 Page 1 of 17 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Thomas A. Saenz (State Bar No. 0) Denise Hulett (State Bar No. ) Andres Holguin-Flores (State Bar No. 00) MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND S.

More information

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9 Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN ADANTÉ D. POINTER, Esq. SBN MELISSA C. NOLD, Esq. SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite

More information

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:14-cv-01601-BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 PAMELA S. HEDIGER, OSB #913099 pam@eechlaw.com LAURIE J. HART, OSB #052766 laurie@eechlaw.com PO Box 781-0781 Telephone: 541.754.0303 Fax: 541.754.1455

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE SUSAN EDMONSOND, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Serve Clerk of the County Commission: 102 East Wall Street

More information

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 5:12-cv-01380-LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION LEIF HENRY, : : No. Plaintiff : : v. : : CITY OF

More information

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative

More information

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)

Case 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) Case 1:17-cv-00628-RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) DELVON L. KING * 2021 Brooks Drive District Heights, MD

More information

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA - TELEPHONE (0) - WILLIAM M. SHERNOFF # EVANGELINE FISHER GROSSMAN #0 JOEL A. COHEN # SHERNOFF BIDART & DARRAS, LLP 00 South Indian Hill Boulevard Claremont, CA Telephone: (0) - Facsimile:

More information

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com

More information

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 3:08-cv-00052-KRG 3:05-mc-02025 Document 23 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 1 of of 9 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA DOHNER, Civil Action vs. Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164 Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:

More information

Case 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO

Case 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO Case 1:14-cv-01483-RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO Case No. CANDICE ZAMORA BRIDGERS, vs. Plaintiff, CITY

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12cv26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12cv26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION MARILYN FIELDS STEPHEN FIELDS Plaintiffs v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:12cv26 RICKY KING, CITY OF CENTER DETECTIVE JUDGE: STEPHEN

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45- STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL

More information

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION 3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2018E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018 T SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX -------------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â FELITA LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of L.M., FELITA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LARRY MASON; individually and : on behalf of a class similarly situated; : MODESTO RODRIGUEZ; : individually and on behalf of a class : CIVIL ACTION

More information

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00801-DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action

More information

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:07-cv-03792-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 BY: Brian M. Puricelli, Esquire KRAVITZ AND PURICELLI 691 Washington Crossing Road Newtown PA 18940 (215) 504-8115 ATTORNEY ID # 5146

More information

Case 5:13-cv PSG-AJW Document 22 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:256

Case 5:13-cv PSG-AJW Document 22 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:256 Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: S. DOUGLAS ST., SUITE 0, EL SEGUNDO, CA 0 Telephone: ()--0; Facsimile: (00) - Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: COMES

More information

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jam-efb Document Filed // Page of Jack Duran, Jr. SBN 0 Lyle D. Solomon, SBN 0 0 foothills Blvd S-, N. Roseville, CA -0- (Office) -- (Fax) duranlaw@yahoo.com GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA and

More information

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com

More information

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey. MICHAEL D. SUAREZ ID# 011921976 SUAREZ & SUAREZ 2016 Kennedy Boulevard Jersey City, New Jersey 07305 (201) 433-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan Plaintiff, ANTHONY TRUCHAN vs. SUPERIOR COURT

More information

Case 1:11-cv NMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:11-cv NMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:11-cv-11850-NMG Document 1 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JOSEPH E. ZAVATSKY, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. ) JOHN O'BRIEN, ELIZABETH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Case 1:13-cv-02425-AT Document 1 Filed 07/22/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JACK LOWE and DENNIS REYNOLDS, v. Plaintiffs, ATLAS

More information

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:15-cv-11949-TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 DOMINIQUE RONDEAU, individually; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION -v- Plaintiff, No. Hon. DETROIT

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case :0-cv-0-ROS Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 0 JELLISON LAW OFFICES, PLLC 0 North Central Avenue Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) 0-0 E-mail: jim@jellisonlaw.com JAMES M.

More information

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27

Case 2:06-cv JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27 Case 2:06-cv-02163-JLL-CCC Document 55 Filed 03/27/2008 Page 1 of 27 HELLRING LINDEMAN GOLDSTEIN & SIEGAL LLP Stephen L. Dreyfuss, Esq. sldreyfuss@hlgslaw.com One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5386

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 Garo Mardirossian, Esq., #1 garo@garolaw.com Armen Akaragian, Esq., #0 aakaragian@garolaw.com MARDIROSSIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Professional Law Corporation Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 00-001

More information

Case 1:10-cv OWW-GSA Document 2 Filed 04/06/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:10-cv OWW-GSA Document 2 Filed 04/06/2010 Page 1 of 7 Case :0-cv-00-OWW-GSA Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS JOHN L. BURRIS, ESQ. SBN STEVEN R. YOURKE, ESQ. SBN 0 Oakport St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA, Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0)

More information

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:06-cv-05206-VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X KENNETH

More information

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION YOLANDA M. BOSWELL, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) v. ) CIVIL CASE NO. 2:07-cv-135 ) JAMARLO K. GUMBAYTAY, ) DBA/THE ELITE REAL

More information

Case 2:17-cv KJM-KJN Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv KJM-KJN Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-kjm-kjn Document Filed // Page of Lindsey Wagner 00 W Alameda Ave Suite 00 Burbank, CA 0 Tele: () -0 Fax: ()-000 Email: LWagner@scottwagnerlaw.com Mail@scottwagnerlaw.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times

More information

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark,

.JAh : Plaintiff Salah Williams, residir,g at 129 Chancellor Avenue in the City of Newark, .. RANDY P. DAVENPORT, ESQ. Attorney-At-Law 50 Park Place, Suite 825 Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 623-5551 * Fax (973) 623-6868 Attorney for Plaintiff, Salah Williams rndavennortaaacom SALAH WILLIAMS,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 189934) Americans for Safe Access P.O. Box 427112 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone: (415) 573-7842

More information

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-00018-GJQ-TPG ECF No. 1 filed 01/25/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DARREN FINDLING, as Personal Representative for The

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-01061 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN TAPIA and FELIPE HERNANDEZ, ) No. ) Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE: Case 3:09-cv-01264-RGJ-KLH Document 1 Filed 07/29/09 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION RENEE STRINGER Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO: JUDGE: WESLEY

More information

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13 Case :0-cv-00-SBA Document - Filed 0//0 Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) Thom Seaton (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation California Plaza North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California

More information

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM

Filing # E-Filed 12/22/ :53:20 PM Filing # 65776381 E-Filed 12/22/2017 05:53:20 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA JASMINE BATES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of AMARI HARLEY,

More information

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626 // : AM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 KAON-JABBAR EAST EL, an individual, v. Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign business corporation, Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEMETRIUS WILLIAMS, And JOHN K. PATTERSON, COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-00056 ERIK H. MICHALSEN, MICHAEL A. POWELL, [Trial

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case 1:09-cv-00155-JRH-WLB Document 1 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 22 DUSTIN MYERS and RODNEY MYERS. Plaintiffs, VS. MURRY BOWMAN, Individually, and as the Chief Magistrate of Jefferson County, Georgia; WILEY

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION DLS/D ERFSIFIED LEGAL SERVICES, INC 1-0- FILro CIVIL SUSINESS OFFICE ; 1- RAL DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 P. CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN, SB# ARDALAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC 0 Canoga Ave., Suite Woodland Hills, CA 1 Telephone:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:10-cv-02411-JDW-EAJ Document 1 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BELINDA BROADERS, AS PARENT, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FOR AND

More information

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16 Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:

More information

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:15-cv-10547-PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 Timothy Davis and Hatema Davis, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN

More information

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ESTATE OF ROSHAD MCINTOSH, ) Deceased, by Cynthia

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Morris S. Getzels, Esq. (SBN 0 MORRIS S. GETZELS Law Office 0 Tampa Avenue, Suite 0 Tarzana, CA - Telephone ( -0 or ( -000 Facsimile ( - email: morris@getzelslaw.com

More information

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,

More information

Case 2:13-cv MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT Case 2:13-cv-05430-MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NORVEL LASSERE VERSUS KEITH CARROLL, ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH SHERIFF MICHAEL

More information

Plaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as

Plaintiff Edgar Castro for his Complaint against Defendants hereby alleges as David W. Dow (#00) Ddowlaw1@gmail.com Jennifer L. Levine (#001) jlevine@ddowlaw.com DOW LAW OFFICE E. Camelback #1 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Office: 0..0 Direct: 0-0-1 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF

More information

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Case 1:13-cv-00076-MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 tv 13-0076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------- Y ANAHIT PAPILLA x r COMPLAINT AND JURY

More information

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 4:16-cv-00648-JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION COURTNEY GRAHAM CASE NO. Plaintiff v. DRAKE UNIVERSITY/KNAPP

More information

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION CASE 0:14-cv-03408-SRN-SER Document 1 Filed 09/08/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, CUMMINS POWER

More information

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18

Case3:14-cv MEJ Document1 Filed11/24/14 Page1 of 18 Case:-cv-000-MEJ Document Filed// Page of TINA WOLFSON, SBN 0 twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com ROBERT AHDOOT, SBN 0 rahdoot@ahdootwolfson.com THEODORE W. MAYA, SBN tmaya@ahdootwolfson.com BRADLEY K. KING, SBN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LATEEF H. GRAY, Esq./State Bar #00 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre

More information

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION 2:16-cv-02046-HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 E-FILED Friday, 19 February, 2016 02:32:45 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

More information

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed 0//0 Page of Steven E. Harrison, Esq. (No. 00) N. Patrick Hall, Esq. (No. 0) WALLIN HARRISON PLC South Higley Road, Suite 0 Gilbert, Arizona Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:

More information

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN, SBN 0 ELIZABETH ESPARZA-CERVANTES, SBN 0 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 0 The Embarcadero, Suite 00 San Francisco,

More information