Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA"

Transcription

1 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JAMES FIDEL SOTOLONGO, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION Case No. 6:13-CR-99-JAJ-KRS Defendants. / MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL Defendants James Sotolongo and Stephanie Musselwhite, through undersigned counsel, move pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33(a) for the entry of an order vacating the jury's verdict and granting a new trial in this cause on the following grounds: (1) The venire from which the jury was chosen violated the Sixth Amendment due to the severe underrepresentation of African-Americans. (2) The unsupervised enforcement of the juror dress code for the Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida by court security officers and/or representatives of the United States Marshal's Service resulted in a significant number of otherwise qualified jurors being denied their right to serve on a petit jury in contravention of the Defendants Sixth Amendment rights and the prospective jurors rights conferred by 28 U.S. C (3) The court unjustifiably denied the defendants request to include a theory of defense good faith instruction in the preliminary instructions given to them.

2 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 17 PageID 1086 (4) The Court erroneously allowed the jury to keep and use copies of the preliminary instructions throughout the entire course of the trial, including a substantial portion of their deliberations. (5) Three of the government's witnesses were designated as records custodians of financial institutions who made the mortgage loans at issue in this case. None of these witnesses had personal firsthand knowledge of any of the loans made by their respective financial institutions. Nor were they in anyway involved in the underwriting process or ultimate lending decisions. Over defense objections, the Court impermissibly allowed each of these witnesses to express lay and/or expert opinions explaining how information submitted on the Uniform Residential Loan Applications impacted or influenced the banks' lending decision. (6) The court erroneously denied Ms. Musselwhite's proffered theory of defense instruction. (7) Mr. Sotolongo was denied due process of law when his plea agreement negotiated in good faith with the government was rejected by a district judge who had improperly assumed jurisdiction of this case and was subsequently recused due to an admitted bias. (8) The defendants were denied due process of law when the government improperly and without notice to the defendants and in violation of the local rules of this court moved and ultimately succeeded in transferring jurisdiction from the original judge assigned to this case. I. On the morning the trial began, a venire consisting of 50 prospective jurors was brought into the courtroom. There was only one African-American among the prospective jurors. This fact was immediately brought to the Court s attention by defense counsel, and the Court mentioned that it too was surprised that there was only one (1) African-American in the entire 2

3 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 17 PageID 1087 venire. The defense then moved to strike the venire based upon the severe underrepresentation of that minority group. In support of the motion to strike the venire, the defense provided the Court with census data documenting that African-Americans comprised up to 15-20% of the population of the surrounding counties from which the venire was drawn. African-American constituted, however, a mere 2% of the venire. Absent a flaw in the process utilized in drawing the venire that resulted in the systematic exclusion of African-Americans, there is no explanation for such an overwhelming underrepresentation. 1 Despite the glaring underrepresentation of African-Americans on the venire and the likelihood the underrepresentation resulted from systematic exclusion, the Court denied the defense motion and proceeded with jury selection. As the Supreme Court explained in Holland v. Illinois, the fair cross-section requirement is not explicit in the text of the Sixth Amendment, but is derived from the traditional understanding of how an impartial jury is assembled. That traditional understanding includes a representative venire, so that the jury will be... drawn from a fair cross section of the community. 493 U.S. 474, 480, 110 S.Ct. 803, 807 (1990) (quoting Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 527, 95 S.Ct. 692, 696 (1975)) (emphasis in original). The representativeness requirement serves the goal of impartiality because it prevents the government from drawing up jury lists in such manner as to produce a pool of prospective jurors disproportionately ill disposed towards one or all classes of defendants. Id. A defendant establishes a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement by showing that: (1) the allegedly excluded group is a distinctive group in the community ; (2) 1 The lone African-American on the venire could not serve on the jury because she had prior educational commitments and was excused by the court. 3

4 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 17 PageID 1088 the representation of this group in the venire from which the jury was selected was not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community ; and (3) the underrepresentation was due to systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process. Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 364, 99 S.Ct. 664, 668 (1979). II. The Local Rules for the Orlando Division of the United States District Court of the Middle District of Florida establishes a dress code for jurors. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The rule does not articulate how complying or not complying with a dress code either enhances or diminishes a person's qualifications to serve as a petit juror. On the first day of trial, a large number of prospective jurors arrived at the courthouse well before 8:00 a.m. and formed a line to be screened by court security. During the security screening process, a number of prospective jurors were denied entry to the courthouse because, at least in the view of the court security officers, they were not in compliance with the juror dress code. These prospective jurors were simply sent away. They were never allowed entry to the courthouse and were thus excluded from the venire from which the jury in this case was eventually selected. There is no reason to believe each of these individuals was not at least equally or more qualified than any juror who ultimately sat in judgment in this case. The possible reasons why a prospective juror did not dress in accordance with the code are numerous and could include an economic inability to comply, religious beliefs that mandate an individual dress in a certain fashion, or simply that an individual chooses to dress in accordance with the accepted fashion norms of a racial minority. Alternatively, a prospective juror may have to wear sneakers for medical reasons. An exclusion of a potential juror based on religion, economic status or race is violative of 28 U.S.C. 1862, which specifically provides, in 4

5 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 5 of 17 PageID 1089 pertinent part, that "[n]o citizen shall be excluded from service as a grand or petit juror in the district courts of the United States... on account of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, or economic status. The refusal of security to allow certain prospective jurors to enter the courthouse based on the perceived noncompliance with a dress code resulted in the random, yet systematic, exclusion of individuals who were otherwise qualified to serve. At a minimum, these individuals should have been allowed to enter the courthouse, become a part of the venire, and participate in the jury selection process. Each individual who was summarily excluded should have been given an opportunity to explain their manner of dress. If their mode of dress was based on religious or moral beliefs or economic or medical reasons, the Sixth Amendment and 28 U.S.C rendered their exclusion unlawful and deprived the defendants of their Sixth Amendment rights to a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community and the individuals' right to serve on a jury. The decision to exclude these prospective jurors from jury service was a decision that could lawfully only be made by the Court after a hearing fully developing the facts and during which the defense was given a full their opportunity to be heard. Under no circumstances does a court security officer unilaterally have the right to exclude prospective jurors and thus impact the composition of the venire and, ultimately, the jury selection process. III. Prior to trial, the parties and the Court engaged in an extensive exchange of s concerning the preliminary instructions that the court announced it would read to the jury at the start of the case. At no point during the exchange did the Court inform the defense that it was the Court's intention to allow the jurors keep the preliminary instructions in their possession 5

6 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 6 of 17 PageID 1090 throughout the trial. Had the Court done so, the defense would have advised the Court that it objected to this highly irregular procedure. On the morning that trial commenced, the defense requested the Court to include within the preliminary instructions a theory of defense good faith instruction. The Court denied that request on the basis that it was, in the court's view untimely. Ultimately, each of the jurors was given and allowed to keep in their possession throughout the trial, copies of the preliminary instructions which not only failed to include the requested good faith instruction, but were also incomplete in other respects. Even after the jury was charged in accordance with the final instructions at the conclusion of the case, they maintained copies of the incomplete preliminary instructions and in fact used them during the course of their deliberations. Prior to deliberations, the jury was not told that they could not use or refer to the preliminary instructions. Where, as in this case, the jury is given preliminary instructions that are clearly deficient in that, inter alia, the preliminary charge failed to include a good faith instruction, the giving of final instructions that include the proper instruction does not cure the problem unless the jury is specifically told which set of instructions controls their deliberations. United States v. Hernandez, 176 F.3d 719 (3d Cir. 1999). Here, not only was the jury not so instructed, but each juror was allowed to have a copy of both the preliminary and final instructions to use during the deliberations. IV. Prior to trial, the government provided the defense with a witness list that identified three individuals who were to testify in their capacity as records custodians of the lenders that made the mortgage loans at issue in this case. As the trial unfolded, the testimony of each of these 6

7 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 17 PageID 1091 individuals went far beyond the testimony expected of a records custodian. Each of these witnesses, on the theory that their work experience qualified them to do so, was allowed to express opinions, often in response to a hypothetical question posed by the government, to the effect that purportedly false representations contained in the URLA submitted to the lender ultimately impacted the lending decision, essentially vouching for the government s theory of prosecution. Effectively, each of these witnesses, none of whom had firsthand knowledge of or involvement in the loans at issue, testified as an expert disguised as a lay witness records custodian and impermissibly expressed opinions on a number of critical issues. See, e.g., United States v. Hill, 643 F.3d 807, 842 (11th Cir. 2011), suggesting that such testimony would be improper where the witness was not a participant in the underlying transaction. V. The Court abused its discretion in denying Ms. Musselwhite's theory of defense instruction where there was evidence in the record to support the instruction, the instruction was a correct statement of the law and not otherwise covered in the instructions delivered by the Court, and was in accordance with the presentation of her defense. A copy of the proffered instruction is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". An accused in a criminal case has the right to have the jury instructed on her theory of defense separate and apart from instructions given on the elements of the charged offense. United States v. Opdahl, 930 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir. 1991); United States v. Lively, 803 F2d 1124 (11th Cir. 1986). The trial court may not refuse to charge the jury on a specific defense theory where the proposed instruction presents a valid defense and where there has been some evidence produced at trial relevant to that defense. United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820 (11th Cir. 1982). The trial court is not free to determine the existence of such a defense as a matter of law. 7

8 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 17 PageID 1092 Id. The threshold burden is extremely low: "[T]he defendant... is entitled to have presented instructions relating to a theory of defense for which there is any foundation in the evidence." Perez v. United States, 297 F.2d 12, (5th Cir. 1961). In deciding whether a defendant has met his burden, the Court is obliged to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the accused. United States v. Williams, 728 F.2d 1402, 1404 (11th Cir. 1984). This Circuit has held that good faith is a complete defense to a charge of intent to defraud under mail fraud and similar statutes and if there is any evidence in the record upon which to base a good faith defense, failure to give a good faith instruction is reversible error. United States v. Goss, 650 F.2d 1336, 1345 (5th Cir. 1981) (charging the jury that a finding of specific intent to defraud is required for conviction, while it may generally constitute the negative instruction, i.e., that if the defendants acted in good faith, they could not have had the specific intent to defraud required for conviction, does not direct the jury's attention to the defense of good faith with sufficient specificity to avoid reversible error). VI. Mr. Sotolongo s convictions on all counts, other than Count One, must be vacated due to the fact that his plea agreement, which was negotiated in good faith with and accepted by the government, was improperly rejected by a successor district judge who had erroneously assumed jurisdiction over this case admittedly in contravention of the Local Rules and defendant's due process rights and eventually recused due to bias or interest in the case. After extended negotiations between Mr. Sotolongo and the government, the parties reached an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Sotolongo would enter a plea of guilty to Count One of the indictment, which charged him with conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C At the time the agreement was reached, this case was still being presided over by the original judge 8

9 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 17 PageID 1093 to whom the case was assigned. Thereafter, in contravention Local Rules and Mr. Sotolongo's due process rights, the case was transferred to a successor judge. On February 4, 2014, Mr. Sotolongo appeared before that judge for the purposes of entering a plea of guilty to count one of the indictment in accordance with the provisions of his agreement with the government. The judge refused to accept the agreed-to plea. On March 13, 2014, this judge was recused on the basis of bias and a financial interest in the case that existed from the very moment that he took jurisdiction of this case. Despite the recusal and assignment of the case to another judge, the government refused to go forward with its agreement with Mr. Sotolongo. At that point, he was effectively forced to proceed to trial. A fair trial or hearing before a fair tribunal is a basic requirement of due process. Fairness requires an absence of actual bias in the handling of cases. However, our system of law has always endeavored to prevent situations where the accused is subjected to even the probability of unfairness. In Re Murchison, 349 U.S 133, 136, 75 S.Ct. 623, 625 (1955). Thus, due process demands that no judge is permitted to try or hear cases in which he of she has any interest in the outcome. Id.. Any interest that would offer a possible temptation to the average man as a judge not to hold the balance nice and true between the State and the accused denies the accused of due process of law. Tumey v. State of Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 532, 47 S.Ct.437, 444 (1927). Mr. Sotolongo's plea colloquy was conducted by a tribunal that was anything but fair. The result was that, because of interest and bias, the judge improperly refused to accept his plea of guilty to Count One of the indictment. Denied the opportunity to plead guilty in accordance with his agreement with the government, Mr. Sotolongo was forced to go to trial and the jury found him guilty of not only Count I, but also all but one of the offenses with which he had been 9

10 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 17 PageID 1094 charged. Unlike Count I, which carries a statutory maximum penalty of five years, each of the additional counts of conviction carries a 30-year statutory maximum penalty. VII. The defendants were denied due process of law when the government improperly and without notice to the defendants and in violation of the local rules of this Court moved and ultimately succeeded in transferring jurisdiction from the original judge assigned to this case, thereby exposing the defendants to resolution of dispositive motions by a judge who recused prior to trial. The defendants renew their pretrial motions and urge the Court to grant them an evidentiary hearing on those matters. The evidence at trial is consistent with the pretrial claims of the defendants, including that the search executed pursuant to warrant far exceeded any scope of proper authorization. Similarly, the undue time restriction on defense motions an order imposed by the recused judge and never reconsidered, that limited the defendants to a very brief window for motions, even as discovery was ongoing was unfairly restrictive. The defense could have, with the benefit of motion practice, obtained greater disclosure from the government and learned of the government s plan to utilize bank representatives as experts rather than records custodians. The defense would then have been in a position to move for a Daubert hearing and to prepare to present defense counter-experts, a task rendered nearly impossible after trial had begun and after the surprise use of the opinion evidence was made. Similarly, additional time for pretrial motions would have allowed the defense to more strongly support a severance from the trial of co-defendant Ramara Garrett, whose defense at trial was essentially antagonistic to that of defendant Musselwhite. Particularly given the conflict of interest acknowledged by the magistrate judge and the absence of a de novo hearing on the motion to disqualify, the defendants were unfairly prejudiced by denying the motion to 10

11 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 17 PageID 1095 extend the motion deadline. In effect, defendant Sotolongo was deprived entirely of the right to file pretrial motions. The overall procedural posture created by a motion practice schedule adopted by the recused judge, whose order of recusal maintained control of the case, warrants the granting of a new trial and a return to the status quo prior to the recused judge s assumption of authority over the case as a result of the motion filed by the government that violated the defendant s due process rights. WHEREFORE, for all of these reasons and those expressed in motions presented to the Court prior to and at trial in this case, the defendants request that the Court grant them a new trial and an evidentiary hearing to further establish their claims. Respectfully submitted, BRUCE A. ZIMET, P.A. LAW OFFICES OF One Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 JOHN E. BERGENDAHL Fort Lauderdale, Florida S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 1100 Telephone No.: (954) Miami, Florida Facsimile No.: (954) Telephone No.: (305) bazimetlaw@aol.com Facsimile No.: (305) lojeb1100@gmail.com By: /s/ Bruce A. Zimet By: /s/ John E. Bergendahl Bruce A. Zimet John E. Bergendahl Florida Bar No Florida Bar No

12 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 12 of 17 PageID 1096 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed electronically by CM/ECF system with the Clerk of Court and electronic copy furnished to all counsel of record, this 30th day of May, /s/ John E. Bergendahl John E. Bergendahl 12

13 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 13 of 17 PageID 1097

14 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 14 of 17 PageID 1098

15 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 15 of 17 PageID 1099

16 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 16 of 17 PageID 1100

17 Case 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 17 of 17 PageID 1101

Case 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Case 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. No. 13-CR Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Mona K. 2:13-cr-20764-PDB-MKM Doc # 587 Filed 08/10/15 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 7354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, vs. No. 13-CR-20764

More information

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368 Case 213-cr-00183-MHW-TPK Doc # 56 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 213-CR-183

More information

USA v. Brenda Rickard

USA v. Brenda Rickard 2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-1-2009 USA v. Brenda Rickard Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-3163 Follow this and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMARCUS O. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 15-CV-1070-MJR vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) REAGAN, Chief

More information

MOTION CHALLENGING JURY ARRAY AND TO QUASH JURY PANEL. The Defendant requests this Court, under the authority of the 6 th and 14 th

MOTION CHALLENGING JURY ARRAY AND TO QUASH JURY PANEL. The Defendant requests this Court, under the authority of the 6 th and 14 th CAUSE NO. 11-272925 STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY COURT VS. AT LAW NO. 5 OF BRYAN OBERLE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION CHALLENGING JURY ARRAY AND TO QUASH JURY PANEL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

More information

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 535 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cr GAO Document 535 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 535 Filed 09/05/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 13-cr-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV ) OPPOSITION

More information

Case 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149

Case 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149 Case 3:18-cr-00089-MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CASE NO.: 3:18-cr-89-J-34JRK

More information

Case 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 60 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 154

Case 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 60 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 154 Case 3:18-cr-00089-MMH-JRK Document 60 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 154 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CASE NO.: 3:18-cr-89-J-34JRK

More information

Case 8:18-cr TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 8:18-cr TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Case 8:18-cr-00012-TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. TDC-18-0012 MARK T. LAMBERT, Defendant.

More information

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017) 19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017) PLEASE REVIEW ALL PROCEDURES PRIOR TO CONTACTING THE JUDGE S OFFICE Page

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia U.S. v. Dukes IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 04-14344 D. C. Docket No. 03-00174-CR-ODE-1-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCES J. DUKES, a.k.a.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 20 2016 15:53:20 2015-CP-00893-COA Pages: 30 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ERNIE WHITE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00893-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:07-cr EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:07-cr-00103-EEF-ALC Document 204 Filed 12/02/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL DOCKET NO. 07-103 v. * SECTION: L JAMES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION. v. : NO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION. v. : NO Case 1:06-cr-00125-SLR Document 67 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION v. : NO. 06-125 TERESA FLOOD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant(s). Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The defendant(s), appeared for

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Order Number 2016-28-Civ AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER INSTITUTING A UNIFORM TRIAL ORDER FOR CIRCUIT CIVIL CASES

More information

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 11-00224-01/02-CR-W-DW JOSHUA SIMONSON, a/k/a Joshua Michael of Simonson,

More information

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows: Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: DIV 71 UNIFORM ORDER REGARDING SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL

More information

Case 3:16-cr TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102

Case 3:16-cr TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102 Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 31 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID 102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 3:16-cr-93-TJC-JRK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 106 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 351 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 3:16-cr-93-J-32JRK

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. No. 1: 08cr0079 (JCC KYLE DUSTIN FOGGO, aka DUSTY FOGGO, Defendant. MOTION FOR ORDER

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, ) Defendant )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, ) Defendant ) Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1110 Filed 03/02/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No.13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, )

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Administrative Order 2018-62-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER INSTITUTING A UNIFORM TRIAL ORDER FOR CIRCUIT CIVIL CASES

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al.

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al. PlainSite Legal Document Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv-01826 Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al Document 3 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer

More information

Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries

Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries Hand Book for Jurors Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries Payment for Jury Duty Length of Service Dress Attire

More information

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four

More information

RULES FOR LOUISIANA DISTRICT COURTS. TITLES I, II, and III Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court Parish of St. Landry

RULES FOR LOUISIANA DISTRICT COURTS. TITLES I, II, and III Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court Parish of St. Landry RULES FOR LOUISIANA DISTRICT COURTS TITLES I, II, and III Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court Parish of St. Landry Chapter: 2 Chapter Title: Dates of Court 2.0 Rule No: 2.0 None. Local Holidays in Addition

More information

VOIR#DIRE# # IN# # # LOUISIANA#CRIMINAL#TRIALS# # # # # # # #

VOIR#DIRE# # IN# # # LOUISIANA#CRIMINAL#TRIALS# # # # # # # # VOIRDIRE IN LOUISIANACRIMINALTRIALS DennisJ.Waldron Judge(Retired) OrleansParishCriminalCourt January20,2016 I. RIGHT TO VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION A. For Defense LA. Constitution Art. 1 Sec 17 (A) provides

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION Case No. 51-, vs. Plaintiff, Defendants. ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

More information

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)

More information

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CIVIL DIVISION 37 Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-26-2013 USA v. Jo Benoit Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-3745 Follow this and additional

More information

Case: 3:16-cr Document #: 13 Filed: 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 3:16-cr Document #: 13 Filed: 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 3:16-cr-50015 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:16-cr-50015

More information

Case 1:19-cr ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:19-cr ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ROGER J. STONE, JR., Defendant. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

More information

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS

JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS As a Juror, there are certain responsibilities you will be asked to fulfill. A Juror must be prompt. A trial cannot begin or continue

More information

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse HEARINGS 1. Special set hearing time: Special set hearing

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, 02-50024-02 v. SENIOR JUDGE XXX XXX MAGISTRATE JUDGE XXX XXXXXX XXX,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT

More information

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738 Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff,

More information

filed against him on February 2, 1995 from the counts contained in the same indictment against

filed against him on February 2, 1995 from the counts contained in the same indictment against UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, 3:95-CR-030-G v. XXXX XXXX, Defendant. DEFENDANT XXXX XXXX S MOTION FOR

More information

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171 Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL

More information

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner

More information

Case 2:11-cr HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 2:11-cr HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 2:11-cr-00299-HH-FHS Document 133 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIMINAL NO. 11-CR-299 v. * SECTION: HH AARON F.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 188 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID 5418 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, )

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-29-2015 USA v. David Calhoun Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

More information

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Argued April 21, 2004

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Argued April 21, 2004 PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 02-3042 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. LAWRENCE FAMAKINDE ADEDOYIN LAWRENCE FAMAKINDE OMOADEDOYIN LAWRENCE FAMAKINDE SIR LAWRENCE ADEDOYIN

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Richard Montgomery appeals the district court s denial of his motion for a new

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Richard Montgomery appeals the district court s denial of his motion for a new UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit TENTH CIRCUIT January 3, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. Plaintiff-Appellee, No.

More information

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S-2013-008 (Supersedes Administrative Order S-2012-052) CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION PROCEDURES The procedures used for

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff(s) vs. Defendant(s) / CASE NO. COMPLEX CIVIL DIVISION JUDGE ORDER SETTING TRIAL PRE-TRIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND

More information

Rule 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases.

Rule 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases. POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS 234 Rule 900 CHAPTER 9. POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases. 901. Initiation of Post-Conviction Collateral Proceedings.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial

More information

Case 1:15-cr CG-B Document 243 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:15-cr CG-B Document 243 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 8 Case 1:15-cr-00102-CG-B Document 243 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CRIMINAL NO. 15-00102-CG

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION Plaintiff(s), CASE NO.: v. DIVISION:. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CAUSE FOR TRIAL AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH CONLEY No. 12 CR 986 Judge Gary Feinerman PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) V. ) NO ) ) ) JASON WHITE ) ) PETITION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) V. ) NO ) ) ) JASON WHITE ) ) PETITION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. NO. 16-02794 17-01568 JASON WHITE PETITION Comes now Jason White pro-se, and files this Petition in exercising his 1 st Amendment

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:17-cr-00229-AT-CMS Document 42 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JARED WHEAT, JOHN

More information

DEFENDANT S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION OF GRAND JURY MINUTES

DEFENDANT S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR PRODUCTION AND INSPECTION OF GRAND JURY MINUTES Case 1:04-cr-00156-RJA-JJM Document 99 Filed 11/10/09 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -vs- BHAVESH KAMDAR Defendant. INDICTMENT: 04-CR-156A

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) / STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND

More information

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421 Case: 1:12-cr-00723 Document #: 297 Filed: 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:2421 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 12 CR 723, 13

More information

TREVINO v. TEXAS. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas

TREVINO v. TEXAS. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas 562 OCTOBER TERM, 1991 TREVINO v. TEXAS on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas No. 91 6751. Decided April 6, 1992 Before jury selection began in petitioner Trevino

More information

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS Nothing in my Individual Practices supersedes a specific time period for filing a motion specified by statute or Federal Rule including but not limited to

More information

Case 1:18-cr Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 1:18-cr Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Case 1:18-cr-00083 Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Case No:

More information

Case: 1:16-cr TSB Doc #: 229 Filed: 11/22/17 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 5045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cr TSB Doc #: 229 Filed: 11/22/17 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 5045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cr-00063-TSB Doc #: 229 Filed: 11/22/17 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 5045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Case No. 1:16-CR-63 v.

More information

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Criminal Case No. 05 cr 00545 EWN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham UNITED STATES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION Case 4:17-cv-00577-MW-CAS Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION VENITA WOODFAULK, Plaintiff, Case No. v. DOCTORS

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-10-2013 USA v. John Purcell Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-1982 Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC TH DCA CASE NO. 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC TH DCA CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC-11-1477 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D08-4729 BRIAN HOOKS, ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

More information

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

More information

MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850

MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 RULE 3.987. MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF MODEL FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 In the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit, in

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case 1:08-cr-00888 Document 316 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 08 CR 888 ) Hon. James B. Zagel

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION. v. ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION. v. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION United States of America, Case No. 3:06CR719 Plaintiff v. ORDER Marwan Othan El-Hindi, Defendant This is a criminal

More information

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA Case 3:09-cr-00117-JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Criminal No. 3:09-cr-117 Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI

More information

FLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.

FLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3. RULE 3.987. FLORIDA MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF FORM FORM FOR USE IN MOTIONS FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.850 In the Circuit Court of the Judicial Circuit,

More information

Case 5:12-cv KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 5:12-cv KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION Case 5:12-cv-05004-KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION DONROY GHOST BEAR, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 67 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Case 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 67 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA Case 3:09-cr-00117-JAJ-TJS Document 67 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT RYAN DEMUTH, Defendant.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: Defendants. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Case 3:07-cv-00015 Document 7 Filed 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SHERRI BROKAW, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07 CV 15 K DALLAS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LISA BOE, ET AL., v. Plaintiffs, CHRISTIAN WORLD ADOPTION, INC., ET AL., NO. 2:10 CV 00181 FCD CMK ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATUS

More information

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B

JUDGE GABRIELLE N. SANDERS Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations For Osceola County Civil Division 60-G, Courtroom 4B STATE OF FLORIDA NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA COUNTIES OF ORANGE AND OSCEOLA OSCEOLA COUNTY COURTHOUSE 2 COURTHOUSE SQUARE, SUITE 6425 KISSIMMEE, FLORIDA 34741 (407) 742-2495 WWW.NINTHCIRCUIT.ORG

More information

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO 2010 CR 800 Plaintiff December 21, 2010 Vs. DECISION AND ORDER ANTHONY M. CAFARO, JR. THE CAFARO COMPANY (A) JUDGE WILLIAM H. WOLFF, JR..

More information

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION SMITTAL Good Shepherd Children and Family Services provides and promotes equal employment opportunities for all persons without regard race, color, sex, age, national origin or citizenship

More information

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse HEARINGS 1. Special set hearing time (including Foreclosure Summary

More information

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237

Case: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237 Case 213-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc # 91 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 26 PAGEID # 2237 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al, -vs- Plaintiffs, JON

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-297 Lower Tribunal No. 14-455 Camille Lee, etc.,

More information

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District) Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) CR. NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) V. ) CR. NO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. CR. NO. 89-1234, Defendant. MOTION TO AMEND 28 U.S.C. 2255 MOTION Defendant, through undersigned counsel,

More information

RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES

RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES March 6, 2013 Christofer Bates, EDPA SUPREME COURT I. Aiding and Abetting / Accomplice Liability / 924(c) Rosemond v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 2014 WL 839184

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CI-11 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No CI-11 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING 2007-D, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 09-13768CI-11

More information

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)

More information

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200 Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL

More information

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI No. 16-8255 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ROBERT McCOY, Petitioner V. STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO WRIT OF CERTIORARI OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY 26TH JUDICIAL

More information

Case 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13 Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * PLAINTIFF, * V.

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Appellee, No v. N.D. Okla. JIMMY LEE SHARBUTT, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Appellee, No v. N.D. Okla. JIMMY LEE SHARBUTT, ORDER AND JUDGMENT * UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 12, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, No. 07-5151 v. N.D.

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KRISTY S. HOLT, Appellant, v. CALCHAS, LLC, Appellee. No. 4D13-2101 [January 28, 2015] On Motion for Rehearing Appeal from the Circuit Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CASE NO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, CASE NO 1:12-cr-20459-TLL-CEB Doc # 25 Filed 07/29/13 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 177 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 12-20459 v.

More information

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida

In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida In the District Court of Appeal Second District of Florida CASE NO. 2D14-1906 (Lower Tribunal Case No. 10-009347-CI-33) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. DEBORAH GRIFFIN, Appellee. INITIAL BRIEF OF

More information