SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA"

Transcription

1 THOMAS M. BRUEN (SBN ) LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN A Professional Corporation 0 N. California Boulevard, Suite Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () -1 Facsimile: () - tbruen@tbsglaw.com Additional counsel listed on following page Attorneys for Defendants INTERNATIONAL DISPOSAL CORP. OF CALIFORNIA and BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PETER NG and DOLLY WU, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, INTERNATIONAL DISPOSAL CORP. OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation, BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1-0, Defendants. Case No. CV1 Case assigned for all purposes to: Honorable Peter Kirwan, Dept. 1 SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT Complaint Filed: July, Trial Date: January, Hearing Date: Hearing Time:

2 WILLIAM G. BECK (pro hac vice) BRIAN C. FRIES (pro hac vice) ROBERT G. ROONEY (pro hac vice) CYNTHIA M. TEEL (SBN 0) LATHROP & GAGE LLP Grand Blvd., Suite 00 Kansas City, MO Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () ERIK A REINERTSON (SBN 1) LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN A Professional Corporation 0 N. California Boulevard, Suite Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () -1 Facsimile: () - ereinertson@tbsglaw.com Attorneys for Defendants INTERNATIONAL DISPOSAL CORP. OF CALIFORNIA and BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. DAVID R. DUBIN (pro hac vice) NICHOLAS A. COULSON (pro hac vice) LIDDLE & DUBIN. P.C. E. Jefferson Avenue Detroit. Michigan Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () ddubin@mldclassaction.com ncoulson@mldclassaction.com EVANS LAW FIRM, INC. INGRID M. EVANS (SBN 0) ELLIOT WONG (SBN 0) 0 Filmore Street # San Francisco, CA Telephone: () 1- Toll-Free: () 0- Facsimile: () ingrid@evanslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs PETER NG and DOLLY WU

3 SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT IT IS AGREED by and among Peter Ng, Dolly Wu, and all others similarly situated, in their individual and class representative capacity ( Plaintiffs ), and International Disposal Corp. of California and Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc. (collectively Defendants ), through their respective counsel, that the above-captioned lawsuit is settled on the terms set forth below in this Settlement and Release Agreement (this Agreement ) dated October,, subject to the approval of the Court. referred to as the Parties. Plaintiffs and Defendants are sometimes collectively 1. Background 1.1 On July,, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a Complaint, being Case No. CV1, alleging damages arising from Defendants maintaining and operating a facility located at 01 Dixon Landing Road, Milpitas, CA 0, commonly known as the Newby Island Resource Recovery Park ( the Action ). The Action alleges, among other things, that dust, debris, noxious odors, pollutants and air contaminants entered[ed] Plaintiffs property from Newby Island Resource Recovery Park ( Newby Island ) as a result of Defendants operation of and maintaining Newby Island. The Action further alleges that the invasion of Plaintiffs property has caused Plaintiffs to suffer injuries including, but not limited to, exposure to pollutants, horrific odors, and air contaminants and that such invasion has interfered with Plaintiffs use and enjoyment of their property including by causing Plaintiffs to remain inside their homes and forego use of their yards; causing Plaintiffs to keep doors and windows closed when weather conditions otherwise would not so require; and causing Plaintiffs embarrassment and reluctance to invite guests to their homes. Plaintiffs also claim such invasion resulted in loss of property value. The Action asserts claims for private nuisance, public nuisance, trespass, negligence and gross negligence seeking compensatory, exemplary, and punitive relief. The Action is brought as a putative class action on behalf of Plaintiffs and all others similarly situated. Plaintiffs proposed class included all persons within a defined geographic area. Defendants filed Answers and Affirmative Defenses denying any liability. Plaintiffs moved the court to certify a class, - 1 -

4 Defendants responded, and the Court denied the motion without prejudice. Defendants continue to deny the appropriateness of class certification for other odor nuisance litigation, and have stipulated to a class for settlement of this lawsuit, under the unique facts of this Agreement. 1. From the inception of this Action, the Parties commenced extensive discovery regarding class certification issues. Such discovery included the production and analysis of thousands of pages of documents, interrogatories, Plaintiffs depositions, Defendants depositions, depositions of putative class members, and expert witness analysis, reports, and depositions. In addition to such discovery, Plaintiffs counsel ( Class Counsel ) and Plaintiffs have made a comprehensive and thorough investigation of the claims and allegations asserted in the Action, the facts and circumstances relevant thereto, and have conducted legal research concerning the viability of Plaintiffs claims. In evaluating the terms of this Agreement, Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have considered: (a) the consideration agreed to be paid, as set forth below; (b) the substantial benefits that would inure to the Class, including those derived from the Improvement Measures; (c) the attendant risks of litigation and the uncertainty of the outcome of the Action; (d) the desirability of permitting the settlement to be consummated as provided by the terms of this Agreement; (e) whether the terms and conditions of this Agreement are fair, reasonable and adequate; and (f) whether it is in the best interests of the members of the Class to settle the Action as set forth in this Agreement. 1. The Parties agreed to engage an independent third party, Timothy Gallagher, to conduct a mediation regarding settlement possibilities. Mr. Gallagher conducted extensive negotiations on January -,, March, and several days thereafter spread over the course of several months. As a result of such negotiations, the Parties have now agreed to terms upon which the Action will be settled. 1. Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of the Class Members, voluntarily and with full knowledge of their rights in the provisions of this Agreement and having the benefit and advice of Class Counsel, now desire to settle, compromise, and dispose of the Action and all Claims the named Plaintiffs and the Class Members have or might have against Defendants - -

5 arising from its operation of Newby Island, and to dismiss the Action with prejudice and to settle with and release Defendants upon the terms and conditions set forth below.. No Admission of Liability or Wrongdoing.1 Defendants expressly deny any wrongdoing alleged in the Action, in the Complaint, or in other papers filed in the Action, and do not admit or concede any actual or potential fault, wrongdoing, or liability in connection with any facts or claims, which have been or could have been alleged against it in the Action. Defendants further contest the appropriateness of class certification other than under the limited and unique facts outlined in this Agreement, and enter into this Agreement for the sole purpose of resolving the disputed claims limited to this Action. Nothing in this Agreement has any application to any other landfill operations of Defendants, or any other class actions in which any Defendant is a party, and Defendants believe and assert that any other case is unique, based upon the individual facts, law, and circumstances for that case. This case is being resolved only after class certification was denied, and under unique facts and circumstances, some of which are involved in the litigation, some of which are not part of the litigation.. The Parties agree that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as an admission by Defendants as to the merit or lack of merit of any particular claim or defense, including the appropriateness of class certification in this or any other action, as set forth in paragraph.1.. Defendants, nevertheless, consider it desirable for the Action to be settled and dismissed because this Agreement will: (i) allow Defendants to avoid further litigation expense and disruption of the management and operation of its business due to the pendency and defense of the Action; (ii) put Plaintiffs claims and the underlying matters to rest; and (iii) avoid the substantial expense, burdens, and uncertainties associated with a possible finding of liability and damages for Plaintiffs and the Class on the claims raised in the Action.. Plaintiffs Litigation Efforts Before and after commencing the Action and during settlement negotiations, Class Counsel conducted a thorough examination and evaluation of the relevant law and facts to assess - -

6 the merits of Plaintiffs claims and potential claims and to determine how best to serve the interests of Plaintiffs and the putative class. In the course of this examination, Class Counsel retained and consulted with experts concerning the merits of Plaintiffs claims and the defenses asserted by Defendants. In particular, during the course of the Action, Class Counsel conducted extensive discovery and had their experts conduct an analysis which has allowed Plaintiffs counsel to verify that the terms of this Agreement are fair and adequate. This discovery included: depositions; analysis of thousands of pages of Defendants environmental and business documents; analysis of records and reports concerning Defendants operations; meetings with families and individuals in the neighborhood surrounding Newby Island; the collection and analysis of information from hundreds of families in the area surrounding Newby Island and responding to and analyzing the answers to interrogatories and document requests propounded by the Parties.. The Settlement.1 Based upon their discovery, investigation, and evaluation of the facts and law relating to the matters alleged in the Action, Plaintiffs, Class Counsel and the Class have agreed to settle the Action, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, after considering such factors as: (i) the substantial benefits to Plaintiffs and the Class under the terms of this Agreement; (ii) the uncertainty of being able to prove the allegations in the Action; (iii) the uncertainty of being able to overcome Defendants defenses thereto, including, but not limited to, defenses based on: statutes of limitations; lack of damages; full use and enjoyment of the neighborhood; failure to meet class certification standards; laches; causation; waiver; the alleged conduct being in compliance with applicable state environmental laws; and Defendants acting in good faith; (iv) the attendant risks of litigation, especially in complex actions such as this, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation; (v) the difficulty of certifying a class, and in particular the court s previous order denying without prejudice Plaintiffs motion for class certification; and (vi) the desirability of consummating this Agreement promptly, in order to provide effective relief to Plaintiffs and the Class without delay. - -

7 . The Parties believe it is appropriate for the Court to certify the Class for settlement purposes only, based upon the unique and specific terms outlined in this Agreement.. Definitions As used in this Agreement and the attached exhibits (which are an integral part of this Agreement and are incorporated in their entirety by this reference), the following terms have the following meanings, unless a part or subpart of this Agreement or its exhibits provides otherwise:.1 Action means the entire lawsuit styled between Peter Ng and Dolly Wu, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. International Disposal Corp. of California, et al., Case No. CV1, pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, including pleadings, briefs, motions and discovery materials in the Action.. Administrator means Class Counsel or any third party agent whom the Parties may retain to help implement the terms of the Agreement.. Claim Form means the claim form which Class Members may complete which is described below in Section and is similar in form to Exhibit F attached to this Agreement.. Claim Processing and Payment Guidelines means the method to file Claims, and process and pay Claims as set forth in Exhibit G attached to this Agreement.. Class Class Member and Class Members shall mean as follows: The Settlement Class shall consist of all persons who have owned or rented, and who also have resided in, any real property located in whole or in part within one and one-half miles of any part of Newby Island, at any time since July, 0, and who do not affirmatively opt out of the Settlement. The class area is depicted on the attached map, Exhibit H, and will be available on a website described in the Class Notice.. Class Counsel means David R. Dubin and Nicholas A. Coulson, and the law firm of Liddle & Dubin, P.C., E. Jefferson Ave., Detroit, Michigan ; and Ingrid M. Evans, and the law firm of Evans Law Firm, Inc., 0 Filmore Street, Suite, San Francisco, California. - -

8 . Class Notice means the notice to be provided to Class Members pursuant to Section of this Agreement, in a form similar to Exhibit A attached to this Agreement.. Class Period means from July, 0 until the date the Court enters the Preliminary Approval Order preliminarily approving this Agreement.. Complaint means the Complaint filed in this Action.. Cooling Off Period mans that for a period of months after Final Approval of this Settlement by the Court, no Class Member can assert or allege any claims for odor, dust or other alleged emissions from Newby Island.. Costs of Administration means all expenses incurred in connection with the administration of the settlement of the Action, including all fees and expenses of the Administrator, if any.. Costs of Notice means all costs and expenses incurred in discharging the obligation to notify Class Members of the Settlement and this Agreement, through mail, and/or publication, or as required by the Court.. Court means the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara.. Escrow Fund or Escrow Account means the escrow account established by Class Counsel, acting as Escrow Agent, at the financial institution of Class Counsel s selection which shall be, unless otherwise decided, designated the Newby Island Landfill Settlement Account, at the PNC Bank, Buhl Building Branch, Detroit, Michigan,. The foregoing account shall serve as a depository for the Settlement Funds, less such amounts as shall be withdrawn therefrom pursuant to this Agreement or Order of the Court only, together with any interest that has accrued thereon. No payments from the Settlement Fund may be made unless Class Counsel endorses the payment check(s), unless otherwise agreed. Any interest accrued on the Settlement Fund shall be part of the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Class.. Fairness Hearing means the hearing(s) at or after which the Court will make a final decision whether to approve this Agreement as fair, reasonable, and adequate, whether to - -

9 approve Class Counsel s application for attorneys fees and expenses, and whether to enter Final Judgment giving effect to this Agreement.. Final Judgment means the stipulated final judgment, including a permanent injunction against Defendants, which has been entered by the Court in the form attached as Exhibit B to this Agreement without any modification prejudicial to the rights of any of the Parties to this Agreement, and which is final and not subject to appeal or, if appealed, has been affirmed on appeal and is not subject to further appeal or modification under California law.. Final Settlement Date means the date on which the Final Judgment becomes final for purposes of this Agreement: a. if no appeal has been taken from the Final Judgment, Final Settlement Date means the date on which the time to appeal therefrom has expired without any appeal being taken therefrom; or b. if any appeal has been taken from the Final Judgment, Final Settlement Date means the date on which all appeals therefrom, including petitions for rehearing or reargument, petitions for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and petitions for certiorari or any other form of review, have been finally disposed of in a manner that affirms the Final Judgment without any modification that would prejudice the rights of any of the Parties as any of them determine in their sole discretion.. Mail means the United States Postal Service.. Newby Island Facilities means the Newby Island Landfill, the Recyclery and the Compost Facility, all of which are located on the property known as the Newby Island Resource Recovery Park ( NIRRP ), and the boundaries of the NIRRP property are depicted on Exhibit H to this Settlement Agreement.. Notice Date means fifteen () days after the Court s entry of the Preliminary Approval Order preliminarily approving this Agreement and providing for Class Notice.. Opt-Out means a Class Member who submits a timely and valid notice of his/her/its request for exclusion from the Class in the form and within the time set forth in the Class Notice attached as Exhibit A. - -

10 . Opt-Out Period means the period approved by the Court during which Class Members may exercise their right to Opt-Out of the Class and this Agreement.. Party means either Plaintiffs or Defendants.. Parties means Plaintiffs and Defendants.. Person or Persons means natural persons and all entities and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes, joint owners, associations, societies, fraternal organizations, companies, partnerships, joint ventures and/or corporations.. Plaintiffs means Peter Ng and Dolly Wu who filed this Action on behalf of themselves and the Class.. Preliminary Approval Order means the order to be entered by the Court concerning the preliminary approval of this Agreement, Class Notice and the Fairness Hearing, as contemplated in Section of this Agreement and in a form similar to Exhibit C attached to this Agreement.. Released Claims means any and all claims asserted in the Action and any and all causes of action, liabilities, damages, equitable claims, injuries, legal claims and administrative relief, interest, demands and rights whatsoever (including, but not limited to, any claims for damages, relief of any kind, interest, attorneys fees, expert fees, consulting fees, and any other costs, expenses whatsoever), whether based on tort, contract, common law, federal statute, the statutes of the State of California, the code or regulations of the State of California and/or the United States, or laws from any other source, whether fixed or contingent, whether accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, that have been, could have been, or may be alleged in the Action, or could be alleged or asserted now or in the future in the Action or by Plaintiffs or any of them, the Class or any Class Member based on, arising out of, or otherwise connected in any fashion to Defendants in any manner whatsoever, including, but not limited to, all claims based on trespass, nuisance, negligence, gross negligence, or any other legal theory premised on alleged emissions of noxious or other odors, dust, pollution, pollutants, debris, air contaminants or fallout, including claims seeking equitable relief or compensatory damages or punitive damages due to interference with use and enjoyment of property, damage to property, annoyance, - -

11 inconvenience, exposure, and physical reactions to the alleged emissions that were or could have been asserted in this Action. Released Claims expressly includes Unknown Claims. The release shall not bar claims for diagnosed medical harm, other than contemporaneous physical reactions to alleged odors, dust, pollution, pollutants, debris, air contaminants or fallout,, but no claims based on such diagnosed medical harm shall ever be brought in the present litigation. Each settling Class Member shall be informed in the Class Notice that by remaining a Class Member they are warranting and representing to the Released Parties that, as of the date of the final Settlement Agreement, he or she has not been diagnosed with, is not aware of, and does not have any symptoms that he or she suspects could be associated with any sickness, disease or physical injury which may have been caused by the action or inaction of any of the Released Parties; and that he or she has not received benefits under Medicare or any other governmental program for any such sickness, disease or injury; and that he or she will defend and indemnify the Released Parties against any lien claims by any party including Medicare or any other governmental program seeking repayment of such benefit.. Settlement means the resolution of the Action by amicable agreement of the Parties on the terms and conditions provided in this Agreement, subject to approval of the Court..0 Settlement Funds means the amount paid by Defendants pursuant to Section below..1 Settlement Relief means the relief being provided by Defendants to the Class as described in this Agreement at Section below.. Improvement Measures means the actions undertaken or to be undertaken by Defendants as set forth in the attached Exhibit D.. The Agreement or this Agreement means this Settlement and Release Agreement.. Defendants means not only the companies, International Disposal Corp. of California, a California corporation, and Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc., a California corporation, but also, each and all of Defendants past or present owners, stockholders, officers, directors, employees, representatives, attorneys, advisors (and their spouses, heirs, - -

12 members of their immediate families or any trusts for which any of them are trustees, settlers or beneficiaries), insurers, subsidiaries, intermediate or ultimate parent companies, affiliated entities (including any entity which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with any person or entity described in this Section.), related companies, divisions, assigns, predecessors and successor entities (and other directors, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of such parent companies, divisions, subsidiaries, assigns, affiliates, predecessor and successor entities), and all persons acting by, through, on behalf of, under or in concert with any of them.. Defendants Counsel means the Law Offices of Thomas M. Bruen, a Professional Corporation, and the law office of Lathrop & Gage LLP.. Unknown Claims means any claims that could have been brought in this Action, although unknown or unsuspected to exist by any Class Member.. Household shall mean all the persons who occupy a Housing Unit.. Housing Unit shall mean a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live and eat separately from any other persons in the building and which have direct access from the outside of the building or through a common hall. The occupants may be a single family, one person living alone, two or more families living together, or any other group of related or unrelated persons who share living arrangements.. All other capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meaning ascribed to them herein.. The Settlement.1 Plaintiffs will propose and recommend a Class be certified for Settlement purposes only and Defendants agree solely for Settlement purposes and the purposes of this Agreement and its implementation that the Action proceed as a class action under California Rules of Court Rule.0 et al., with respect to the relief provided for in this Section. - -

13 . If the Court does not approve this Agreement and grant a Final Judgment, however, Defendants expressly retain: (i) all rights to object to the maintenance of the Action as a class action; (ii) all litigation rights available to litigants under the California Rules of Court; (iii) all defenses in the Action and to the Complaint and (iv) all rights to continue opposing class certification.. Defendants will: i) pay the sum of $1,0, in cash (the Settlement Funds ); and ii) provide the Improvement Measures as set forth in Exhibit D to settle all Released Claims in the Action. Either one of: i) the payment of the Settlement Funds; or ii) the substantial performance of the Improvement Measures is and shall be sufficient, adequate, full and final consideration under this Agreement.. Defendants will pay the Settlement Funds ($1,0,000.00) into the Escrow Account within ten () business days after the Final Settlement Date. Defendants have no obligation under any circumstances to pay any of the Settlement Funds prior to the Final Settlement Date and Defendants have no such obligation in the event Defendants exercise their option to terminate this Settlement and Release Agreement pursuant to Section below.. The Settlement Funds shall be distributed and administered only as provided in this Agreement. No person or entity participating in administration or distribution of the funds shall be liable for any acts or omissions in connection with that participation, except for gross negligence, willful misconduct, or breach of fiduciary duty (to the extent that any fiduciary duty exists).. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, Defendants Counsel, Defendants and Defendants representatives, insurers and other agents shall not bear any responsibility for the administration or distribution of the Settlement Funds, except as expressly provided in this Agreement, if at all.. In the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section below, then any of the Settlement Funds which have been paid by Defendants shall be returned to Defendants within 0 days of termination, as defined in Section below. If such funds are not returned within such 0 day period, interest will accrue thereon at the rate for 0 day U.S. Government - -

14 interest bearing instruments from the date of the deposit into the Escrow Fund until the date the money is returned to Defendants.. Notice Expenses: The reasonable costs and expenses to third parties associated with the preparation and dissemination of Class Notice (collectively Notice Expenses ) shall be shared equally by Defendants and Plaintiffs, with Plaintiffs portion to come from the Settlement Funds, and reasonable sums shall be advanced from the Escrow Account to pay for Plaintiffs share of such costs. Any third party costs associated with soliciting Claim Forms and processing Claim Forms shall be paid by Plaintiffs from the Settlement Funds, and reasonable sums shall be advanced from the Escrow Account to pay for such costs.. The Notice Expenses described in Section. may be paid directly out of the Settlement Funds, or alternatively, may be advanced by Class Counsel, subject to reimbursement from the Settlement Funds, or from Defendants for Defendants portion of the Notice Expenses pursuant to Section... The Net Settlement Funds shall consist of the Settlement Funds, less the following as approved by the Court: a. All Notice Expenses specified in Section. of this Agreement; b. Class Counsel s reasonable costs and expenses, all as approved by the Court, not to exceed $0,000.00; c. Class Counsel s reasonable attorney s fees, as approved by the Court, not to exceed $0,000.00; and d. Plaintiffs compensation as the class representatives for their time and effort assumed by each of them not to exceed $,000 each, and as approved by the Court.. Defendants have begun and will provide the Improvement Measures set forth in Exhibit D over a period of five () years as set forth in Exhibit D. Plaintiffs acknowledge that Defendants may undertake some of the Improvement Measures prior to the Final Settlement Date. Plaintiffs further acknowledge the character and amount of the Improvement Measures to be implemented each year shall be at Defendants sole discretion, except as expressly provided in Exhibit D. Defendants have no obligation under any circumstances to provide any of the - -

15 Improvement Measures prior to the Final Settlement Date and Defendants have no such obligation to provide any of the Improvement Measures at any time, if either Defendants or Plaintiffs exercise either of their options to terminate this Settlement and Release Agreement pursuant to Section below. In the event this Settlement is completed, a Final Judgment is entered and this Agreement is not terminated by either Party, and at a later date Plaintiffs or a Class Member allege that Defendants have not performed their Improvement Measures obligation under this Agreement, then and only then, Plaintiffs or a Class Member may bring an action to enforce Defendants Improvement Measures obligation as stated in Exhibit D without violating this Agreement, if such action is solely and exclusively for the purpose of seeking an injunction to require Defendants to perform its Improvement Measures obligation under Exhibit D to this Agreement, otherwise all actions are permanently barred as provided for under Section below. Such an action for the purpose of seeking an injunction to require Defendants to perform its Improvement Measures obligation shall be Plaintiffs and each Class Member s sole remedy regarding the Improvement Measures.. Class Members shall release Defendants as set forth in Section below.. Notice to the Class, Fairness Hearing.1 Promptly after execution of this Agreement, Class Counsel and Defendants Counsel shall move the Court for preliminary approval of the Settlement and this Agreement and, in support thereof, will lodge with the motion this Agreement together with its Exhibits, the Class Notice substantially in the form of Exhibit A (which contains information on how to opt-out of the Class and how to file a Claim), the Final Judgment substantially in the form of Exhibit B and the Preliminary Approval Order substantially in the form of Exhibit C. The motion will seek, inter alia, the preliminary approval of the Settlement, the approval for providing notice to the Class, the proposed Class Notice, which shall include the general terms of this Agreement and the date of the Fairness Hearing, and time for sending the Notice (fifteen () days after the Court issues its Preliminary Approval Order). Written Notice shall be given to the Class as follows: i) Publication notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit I shall be published in The San Jose Mercury News/Milpitas Post, a newspaper of general circulation in San Jose and Milpitas, California; - -

16 ii) iii) Written notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A shall be provided by Class Counsel to each of the persons listed on Exhibit E, and such notice shall be sent by first class mail, postage prepaid to each such person at such address(es); and Written notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, along with copies of the Stipulation of Settlement and Release Agreement, and Claim Form shall be posted by Class Counsel on the website After the Class Notice is given, the Court will hold a Fairness Hearing and determine whether to approve this Agreement and the Settlement as set forth in this Agreement. At the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel also will request that the Court approve its Fees and Costs.. If it chooses at its sole discretion, Class Counsel may retain one or more Administrators to help implement the terms of the Agreement. The Administrator(s) may assist with various administrative tasks, including, without limitation, the mailing or arranging for the mailing of the Class Notice and publication of the Class Notice.. The Parties shall issue an agreed joint press release upon preliminary settlement approval, and shall make no other public statements regarding the terms of the Settlement that are inconsistent with the press release. Plaintiffs counsel shall not attribute any particular monetary value to the injunctive relief except to the extent the Settlement Agreement itself includes a monetary minimum on mitigation measure expenditures.. The Class and Defendants shall share the costs of providing Class Notice under California Rules of Court Rule. as set forth in Sections. and. above. All other costs relating to the Settlement Fund and the Costs of Administration shall also be borne by the Class and shall be paid from the Settlement Fund. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, Defendants shall not be liable for any fees, costs or expenses whatsoever of Plaintiffs, the Class or any Class Member, in connection with the Action or this Agreement.. Assume No Tax Liability No opinion concerning the tax consequences of the Settlement have been given or will be given by Defendants, Defendants Counsel, Plaintiffs or Class Counsel to Plaintiffs or any Class Member nor are any representations in this regard made or any warranties made by virtue of this - -

17 Agreement. The Class Notice shall direct Class Members to consult their own tax advisors regarding the federal, state, local or other tax consequences of the Settlement. Plaintiffs and each Class Member s tax obligations (including assessments, penalties, interest or payments that arise or may arise as a result of the Settlement, and the determination thereof) are the sole responsibility of each Plaintiff and each Class Member, and it is understood that the tax consequences may vary depending on the particular circumstances of each Class Member.. Lien Warranty, Indemnification, and Satisfaction.1 The Parties have agreed to the release of all claims as set forth in paragraph. of this Agreement. Presently, the Parties are unaware of any member of the Settlement Class who has received treatment necessitated by any disease or medical condition caused by Newby Island, which was covered by various medical providers who may have a lien for the healthcare provided. Each settling Class Member warrants and represents to the Defendants that, as of the date of the final Settlement Agreement, he or she has not been diagnosed with, is not aware of, and does not have any symptoms that he or she suspects could be associated with any sickness, disease or physical injury which may have been caused by the action or inaction of any of the Defendants; and that he or she has not received benefits under Medicare or any other governmental program for any such sickness, disease or injury; and that he or she will defend and indemnify the Defendants against any lien claims by any party including Medicare or any other governmental program seeking repayment of such benefit.. It is agreed that, in the unlikely event that any reimbursement is due to Medicare or any CMS entity, the same shall be paid from the proceeds of the Approved Claim Amount for the Class Member who has filed a valid Claim Form and who is the subject of any action for reimbursement by Medicare or any CMS entity or by the Class Member, and in no event will Defendants be obligated to make or reimburse such payments.. Release And Waiver.1 Upon entry of the Final Judgment, Plaintiffs and each Class Member agree that they have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and - -

18 forever compromised, released, resolved, waived, relinquished, discharged and settled all of the Released Claims contained in Section. against Defendants.. Plaintiffs and each Class Member agree to the Cooling Off Period in Section... The release stated above in Section. shall be effective and binding on Plaintiffs, the Class and each Class Member upon entry of the Final Judgment without any further action of the Parties required.. Permanent Injunction Plaintiffs The Final Judgment shall, among other things, provide that Plaintiffs and each Class Member are forever barred and permanently enjoined from commencing, instituting, prosecuting, intervening in, participating in or receiving any benefit or other relief from any action or other adversary proceeding of any kind in any jurisdiction, in any court of law or equity, arbitration, lawsuit, or administrative forum, directly or representatively, against the Released Parties, with respect to any, some or all of the Released Claims, or relating in any fashion to the Action, the Complaint or the facts and circumstances relating thereto, and bar and enjoin Plaintiffs and each Class Member from filing, commencing, or prosecuting in any jurisdiction, in any court of law or equity, arbitration or administrative forum any action or adversarial proceeding of any kind on behalf of Plaintiffs or any Class Member with respect to any, some or all Released Claims or relating to in any fashion the Action, the Complaint or the facts and circumstances relating thereto. This Section shall not apply to future conduct of Defendants which creates future harm or damages as opposed to future harm or damages arising out of past conduct occurring prior to the Preliminary Approval Order date which is expressly included under Released Claims.. Permanent Injunction Defendants.1 The Final Judgment shall, among other things, provide that Defendants will engage in the Improvement Measures set forth in Exhibit D.. Limitation On Use Of This Agreement.1 Under no circumstances, shall this Agreement or drafts thereof, whether or not executed or consummated, nor any of its terms and provisions or Exhibits, nor any of the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, be: - -

19 i. Construed as an admission of any sort whatsoever, either by Defendants or Plaintiffs, relating to any issue, fact, claim or defense in this Action; ii. iii. iv. Offered or received into evidence in the Action in the event that either party exercises their option to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section or in any other action or proceeding of any nature, including administrative or regulatory proceedings, for any purpose whatsoever except to the extent necessary to respond to or defend against any claim arising from any alleged act or omission in connection with participation in this Action; Referred to for any reason in any writing or document other than to give effect to the provision of this Agreement except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement; or Afforded res judicata, issue preclusion or collateral estoppel effect as to any factual or legal issue.. Payment To Plaintiffs And Class Counsel s Attorneys Fees and Costs.1 As soon as practicable after execution of this Agreement, Plaintiffs and Defendants shall jointly move the Court for preliminary approval and entry of the Preliminary Approval Order substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C and approval of the dissemination of the Class Notice in a form similar to the attached Exhibit A.. At the Fairness Hearing, the Parties will seek the Court s final approval of this Agreement. If this Agreement is approved by the Court, Plaintiffs shall move the Court for entry of the Final Judgment, in a form similar to the attached Exhibit B.. At the Fairness Hearing, Class Counsel will seek the Court s approval of an award of reasonable attorneys fees, expenses and costs to be deducted by Class Counsel from the Settlement Funds, up to $0, ($00,000 for fees, and up to $0,000 for reasonable costs and expenses). Defendants will take no position as to Class Counsel s motion or application for an award of reasonable attorneys fees, expenses and costs. - -

20 . Plaintiffs will deduct from the Settlement Funds the following expenses reasonably incurred after the execution of this Agreement: any publication, printing, postage, or mailing costs of the Class Notice as set forth in Sections. and.; fees and disbursements approved by the Court to the Administrator (if any), and any other third-party contractors engaged by Plaintiffs; and the amount of reasonable attorneys fees and costs determined by the Court.. Defendants shall not be liable or obligated to pay any attorneys fees, expenses, costs, or disbursements, or incur any expense on behalf of, any person, either directly or indirectly, in connection with this Action or this Agreement, other than the Settlement Fund and as expressly provided in this Agreement.. Plaintiffs, subject to Court approval, shall be entitled to deduct from the Settlement Funds the total amount of $, each as compensation for the time and effort assumed by each of them in prosecuting the Action. This total $, will be divided between Plaintiffs as set forth below.. Settlement Fund Distribution.1 The Settlement Fund shall be distributed as follows: A. Notice and Administration: For Plaintiffs share of notice and administration costs as set forth in Sections. and.; B. Attorneys fees and costs: Class Counsel shall receive as and to the extent approved by the Court a reimbursement for their legal fees and out of pocket expenses and, for their efforts in the protection and the advancement of the interests of Plaintiffs and the Class; C. Plaintiffs class representative award: Plaintiffs, Peter Ng and Dolly Wu, if approved by the Court, shall each receive for their diligence and participation in the advancement of the interests of the Class in this litigation the sum of $, dollars; D. All remaining monies from the Settlement Fund shall be divided among all Class Members who submit a Claim Form pursuant to Section.1 and. of this Agreement and who, prior to the Preliminary Approval Order date, qualify as a Class Member pursuant to Section. and file a Claim Form pursuant to Section.. The disbursement of the Settlement Fund and Payment of Claims shall be governed as set forth in Exhibit G, the Claims Processing and Payment Guidelines. - -

21 . Claim Administration.1 To qualify for a Claim, a Class Member must submit his, her or its claim and participate in the Settlement by executing the Claim Form in a form similar to Exhibit F attached to this Agreement.. To be eligible for money from the Settlement Fund, a Class Member must send the fully completed Claim Form to Liddle & Dubin, P.C., E. Jefferson Avenue, Detroit, Michigan -1 by first class mail, postmarked no later than December,.. Claim Form requirements, the processing of Claim Forms, the disbursement of the Settlement Fund and Payment of Claims shall be governed as set forth in Exhibit G, the Claims Processing and Payment Guidelines.. Termination of This Agreement.1 This Agreement shall terminate at the sole option and discretion of either Plaintiffs (through Class Counsel) or Defendants if: (i) the Court, or any appellate court(s), rejects, modifies or denies approval of any portion of this Agreement, the Settlement or the Final Judgment that either Party in its sole judgment and discretion reasonably determines is material, including, without limitation, the terms of relief, the findings of the Court, the provisions relating to notice, the definition of the Class and/or the terms of the Released Claims, or (ii) the Court, or any appellate court(s), does not enter or completely affirm, or alters or expands, any portion of the Final Judgment that either Party in its sole judgment and discretion believes is material. A Party must exercise the option to withdraw from and terminate this Agreement, as set forth in this Section, no later than seven () days after receiving notice of the event prompting the decision to terminate. Nothing herein shall be construed to permit Plaintiffs to terminate this Agreement solely because of the amount of the reasonable attorneys fees and costs awarded by the Court or any appellate court(s).. Defendants also may terminate this Agreement:..1 If the total number of Class Members requesting to Opt-Out of the Settlement exceeds % of the Housing Units in the geographic area of the class as defined and determined by the United States Census Bureau, then, in such event, Defendants may elect - -

22 to terminate this Agreement by so notifying Class Counsel and the Court in writing not less than seven () days prior to the date set for the Fairness Hearing... If, prior to the Final Settlement Date, any governmental authority or authorities should provide notice of, or undertake, action that would threaten materially to increase the cost of the Settlement to Defendants, or materially to decrease the economic relief afforded to the Class Members, then the Parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to restore the economic relief to the Class Members or the cost to Defendants, as the case may be, to what it would have been absent such governmental notice or action. If the Parties cannot agree to such modification, the Parties shall engage a mediator to assist in achieving such a resolution. Should no such negotiation modification or resolution be achieved within 0 days of such governmental notice or action, the adversely affected Party shall have the option, but not the obligation, to terminate this Agreement.. If an option to withdraw from and terminate this Agreement arises under this Section, neither Defendants nor Plaintiffs are required for any reason or under any circumstance to exercise that option, and any exercise of such an option shall be made in good faith. If Defendants have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section..1, but elect not to, then the Settlement Funds will be reduced proportionately consistent with the opt-out percentage.. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section by either Party, then:..1 This Agreement shall be null and void and shall have no force or effect, and no Party to this Agreement shall be bound by any of its terms, except for the terms of Sections,, and this Section ;.. This Agreement and all negotiations, statements and proceedings relating to it shall be without prejudice to the rights of Defendants, Plaintiffs or any Class Member, all of whom shall be restored to their respective positions existing immediately before the execution of this Agreement; - -

23 .. Defendants expressly reserve all defenses, arguments, and motions as to all claims that have been or might later be asserted in the Action, including (without limitation) the argument that the Action may not be litigated as a class action;.. Plaintiffs expressly reserve all motions as to, and arguments in support of, all claims that have been or might later be asserted in the Action, including (without limitation) any argument concerning class certification.. General Matters and Reservations.1 By execution of this Agreement, Defendants do not intend to release any claim they have against any insurer for any payment, fee, cost or expense whatsoever hereunder, including attorneys fees and costs.. Class Counsel represents (i) that it is authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of Plaintiffs, and (ii) that Class Counsel is seeking to protect the interests of the Class.. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement among the Parties with respect to its subject matter, and it may not be altered or modified in any manner except by written instrument executed by Class Counsel and Defendants Counsel. The Parties expressly acknowledge that no other agreements, arrangements, or understandings not expressed in this Agreement exist among or between them.. Whenever this Agreement requires or contemplates that one Party shall or may give notice to the other, notice shall be provided by facsimile and next-day (excluding Sunday) express delivery service as follows: If to Defendants, then to: Thomas M. Bruen Law Office of Thomas M. Bruen 0 N. California Blvd., Suite Walnut Creek, CA Facsimile: -- William G. Beck Lathrop & Gage LLP Grand Boulevard, Suite 00 Kansas City, MO Facsimile:

24 If to Plaintiffs, then to: David R. Dubin Nicholas A. Coulson Liddle & Dubin, P.C. E. Jefferson Avenue Detroit, MI -1 Facsimile: The Parties agree that this Agreement is clear and unambiguous and was drafted jointly by both counsel for the Parties at arm s length, and that no parole or other evidence may be offered to explain, construe, contradict, or clarify its terms, the intent of the Parties or their counsel, or the circumstances under which this Agreement was made or executed.. The Parties reserve the right, subject to the Court s approval, to make any reasonable extensions of time that might be necessary to carry out any of the provisions of this Agreement.. The Parties, Defendants counsel and Class Counsel agree that they will not make public in any way the existence and the contents of this Agreement or the proposed Final Judgment and all related negotiations until the date on which the Final Judgment is entered; provided however, that this Section shall not prevent the disclosure, prior to the date on which the Final Judgment is entered, of information concerning the Settlement, this Agreement or any related negotiations, (i) to regulators, financial analysts, and/or employees of Defendants, where Defendants deem such disclosure necessary to effectuate the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (ii) to Class Members and the public generally as required by the Court to effectuate the Class Notice provisions of this Agreement and/or to effectuate any, if at all, ethical obligations to the Class; and (iii) to any other person or entity (such as experts, courts, and/or Administrators) to which the Parties both agree in writing disclosure must be made in order to effectuate the terms and conditions of this Agreement.. The Parties and their attorneys agree to cooperate fully with one another in seeking Court approval of this Agreement and to use their best efforts to consummate the terms of this Agreement. Neither Plaintiffs nor Defendants shall seek to evade their good faith obligations to seek approval and implementation of this Agreement by virtue of any rulings, orders, - -

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO HEIDI ARNOLD, et al. Plaintiffs, vs. DETREX CORPORATION, Defendant.. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: CV 16-872684 JUDGE JOAN SYNENBERG SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HENRY LACE on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 3:12-CV-00363-JD-CAN ) v. )

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :0-cv-0-RMW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Scott D. Baker (SBN ) Donald P. Rubenstein (SBN ) Michele Floyd (SBN 0) Kirsten J. Daru (SBN ) Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA - Mailing

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:14-cv SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:14-cv-00367-SI Document 240 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON IN RE GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, Case No. 3:14-cv-00367-SI FINAL ORDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Agreement ) is entered into as of the last date of any signature below by and among: (a) (b) Swedish Health

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims

More information

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 Case 5:12-cv-05162-SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant. ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

More information

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Compromise and Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into between Reorganized Adelphia Communications Corporation ( ACC ) and its affiliated

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement ( Agreement or Settlement ) is entered into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself

More information

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :0-cv-0-RAJ Document Filed 0//0 Page of The Honorable Richard A. Jones UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 IN RE: WSB FINANCIAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION Master

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-si Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re MONTAGE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions

More information

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-0-rsm Document 0- Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Atossa Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No. -cv-0-rsm 0 STIPULATION AND

More information

Case 4:14-md CW Document Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 67

Case 4:14-md CW Document Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 67 Case :-md-0-cw Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Craig R. Spiegel (00) Ashley A. Bede (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Eighth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 0

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2

4:12-cv GAD-DRG Doc # Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15 Pg 1 of 82 Pg ID 4165 EXHIBIT 2 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15 Pg 2 of 82 Pg ID 4166 4:12-cv-14103-GAD-DRG Doc # 149-3 Filed 09/21/15

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

reg Doc 5700 Filed 02/24/12 Entered 02/24/12 11:37:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

reg Doc 5700 Filed 02/24/12 Entered 02/24/12 11:37:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 9 Pg 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CHEMTURA CORPORATION, et al., ) Case No. 09-11233 (REG) ) Reorganized Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) STIPULATION

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT State of Oregon Circuit Court for Wasco County NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned and occupied, or rented residential property located within the Class Area near the AmeriTies Plant

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAREER EDUCATION ) CORPORATION SECURITIES ) LITIGATION ) No. 03 C 8884 Honorable Joan Humphrey Lefkow STIPULATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:11-cv-20549-KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned and occupied, or rented residential property located in the vicinity of

More information

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 130 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 108-6 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OKLAHOMA POLICE

More information

Case 2:14-cv PD Document 16 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv PD Document 16 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:14-cv-07013-PD Document 16 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT ARACE, BARBARA ARACE, JOHN BATTIES, CAROLINE SMITH, SHARON

More information

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION BEFORE THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION KAREN DAVIS-HUDSON and SARAH DIAZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Claimants, v. ANDME, INC., Respondent. AAA CASE NO. --00-00 CLASS

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN Davidson v. Henkel Corporation et al Doc. 157 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN B. DAVIDSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement )

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement ) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement ) is entered into as of August 28, 2017, by and among James F. Pauley ( Plaintiff ),

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs. Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ENERGY SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICE AGREEMENT

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ENERGY SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICE AGREEMENT Agreement Number: This Energy Service Provider Service Agreement (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of this day of,, by and between ( ESP ), a organized and existing under the laws of the state

More information

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

More information

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement )

: : : : : : CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Class Action Settlement Agreement (the Agreement or Settlement Agreement ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X LOCKMAN, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:11-cv-02400-RWS Document 72-5 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) CIVIL ACTION NO. IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:17-cv-00869-RDM Document 31 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 701 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NICHOLAS W. FULTON, derivatively on behalf of OVASCIENCE, INC., vs. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:14-cv-00182-HE Document 91 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STAMPS BROTHERS OIL & GAS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-14-0182-HE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I Case 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM Document 1457 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I u:nu ATl\'J!~O'd.L)J 'l J 1 J~'.ll'JO:XXl : " \ (J

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned or rented residential property located within two miles of the Johnson County Landfill

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE (the "Agreement") is entered into, effective August 24, 2015 (the "Effective Date"), by Dr. Arthur Hall, Ph.D. ("Dr. Hall"),

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

Case 8:07-cv SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:07-cv SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:07-cv-01434-SDM-TGW Document 102 Filed 09/03/08 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1794 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION DANA M. LOCKWOOD, on behalf of herself and all others

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION IN RE METROLOGIC INSTRUMENTS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION, CAMDEN COUNTY Docket No. L-6430-06 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CLASS CERTIFICATION, PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) IN RE KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CAPEX LITIGATION IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 9318-VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF UNITHOLDER

More information

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST

AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST THIS AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF TRUST Is made and entered into this day of, 20, by and between, as Grantors and Beneficiaries, (hereinafter referred to as the "Beneficiaries",

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE MICHAEL E. TAYLOR, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DYNAMIC PET PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1616-CV11531 Division

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 'l day of January 2018,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

MILLER SCHIRGER, LLC JOHN J. SCHIRGER (pro hac vice) TEL: FAX: SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

MILLER SCHIRGER, LLC JOHN J. SCHIRGER (pro hac vice) TEL: FAX: SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Execution Version Page 1 of 25 GIRARD GIBBS LLP DANIEL C. GIRARD (SBN 114826 DCG@GIRARDGIBBS.COM ADAM E. POLK (SBN 273000 AEP@GIRARDGIBBS.COM 601 CALIFORNIA STREET, 14TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Case 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS Document 122 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 3581 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND RICHARD MEDOFF, Individually and On ) No. 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS

More information

Case Doc 66-1 Filed 09/11/15 Entered 09/11/15 16:09:23 Desc Exhibit A Page 1 of 56 EXHIBIT A. CNA Companies Settlement Agreement.

Case Doc 66-1 Filed 09/11/15 Entered 09/11/15 16:09:23 Desc Exhibit A Page 1 of 56 EXHIBIT A. CNA Companies Settlement Agreement. A Page 1 of 56 EXHIBIT A CNA Companies Settlement Agreement (Attached) US_ACTIVE-123432026.5-AJMUHA 09/11/2015 3:59 PM A Page 2 of 56 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Agreement (the Agreement ) is

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RUN THEM SWEET LLC, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff vs. CPA GLOBAL LIMITED and CPA GLOBAL NORTH

More information

Case 2:16-cv JTM-KGG Document 21 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:16-cv JTM-KGG Document 21 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:16-cv-02648-JTM-KGG Document 21 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS JULIE JOHNSTON, APRIL WITTENAUER, and JOSEPH CLARK, on behalf of themselves

More information

PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT

PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT This PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is dated as of, 201_, by and between TRANSCONTINENTAL DEPOSITORY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

More information

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:05-cv-00078-RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLA, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ALL-SOUTH SUBCONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERIGAS PROPANE, INC. and AMERIGAS PROPANE, L.P. Case No.: 2014 CA

More information

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ygr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK NATHANSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML Document 98 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. CASE

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:17-cv-02177-WTL-MPB Document 62-1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 52 PageID #: 559 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION KRISTYN PLUMMER, on behalf of herself

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY x JOANN KRAJEWSKI, PAUL Consolidated Case No. 02-CV-221038 MCHENDRY, and MICHAEL LAMB, Division No. 8 Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant

More information

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 2:15-cv JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 2:15-cv-04106-JMA-SIL Document 50-1 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 56 PageID #: 287 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PHILIP J. CHARVAT, an Ohio resident and SABRINA WHEELER,

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury or Defendant) shares pursuant to the merger of Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS WHEREAS, on or about May 3, 2016, Plaintiff Joe Rogers filed a class action complaint ("Complaint"), against Farrelli's Management Services, LLC, Farrelli's Canyon,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 8:10-cv-00199-JFB-TDT Doc # 97-1 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 37 - Page ID # 1394 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID G. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. x : : : : : : : x STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. x : : : : : : : x STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:05-cv-00686-JTC Document 66 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re CHOICEPOINT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates

More information

denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a

denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a 0 0 denies any liability to the Plaintiffs or to members of the putative class. The Parties have reached a settlement, and have submitted for this Court s approval the Joint Statement of Class Action Settlement

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAROLYN LYNN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ARTHUR F. HELF, H. LAMAR COX, MICHAEL

More information

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I

Case 2:15-cv DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28. Appendix I Case 2:15-cv-06668-DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 1 of 28 Appendix I Case 2:15-cv-06668-DS Document 99-2 Filed 05/17/18 Page 2 of 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CLAIMS Case :0-cv-0-MWF-PLA Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 William M. Audet (CA State Bar #) waudet@audetlaw.com Jason T. Baker (CA State Bar #0) jbaker@audetlaw.com Jonas P. Mann (CA State Bar

More information

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs 0 0 This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation is entered into among plaintiffs Richard Layne, Julietta Teratsouian and Carole Carpenter (collectively Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves

More information

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:08-cv-00264-KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK STIPULATION AND

More information

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 008835/2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DOUGLAS, COLORADO 4000 Justice Way, Suite 2009 Castle Rock, CO 80109 IN RE ADVANCED EMISSIONS SOLUTIONS, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS

More information

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014 THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014 ARTICLE 1. OFFICES 1.1 Principal Office - Illinois: The principal office of the Association shall be in the State of Illinois or in such

More information