Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA"

Transcription

1 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW SEARCHMEDIA HOLDINGS LTD., et al., Defendants STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF PARTIAL SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and Agreement of Partial Settlement (the Stipulation ) is submitted pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subject to the approval of the Court, this Stipulation is entered into among Lead Plaintiff Noel Upfall and Defendants SearchMedia Holdings Limited, Robert Fried, Phillip Frost, Rao Uppaluri, Steven Rubin, Glenn Halpryn, Thomas Beier, David Moskowitz, and Shawn Gold. DEFINITIONS As used in this Stipulation, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: 1. Action means Sid Murdeshwar v. SearchMedia Holdings Ltd., et al., Case No. 11-cv KMW, pending in the Court and Hymie Akst v. SearchMedia Holding Limited et al., Case No CIV, filed in the Court. 2. Administration Expenses means all costs, disbursements, and expenses, other than Notification Costs, incurred in the implementation of this Settlement and that are approved by the Court, including, but not limited to, reasonable fees and expenses of the Claim 1

2 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 2 of 31 Administrator to administer the Settlement, review Claims filed by Class Members, and transfer payments to Authorized Claimants. 3. "Arbitration Claims" means the claims that have been or may be brought by SearchMedia in an arbitration proceeding pending in the International Centre for Dispute Resolution against China Seed Ventures, L.P., Qinying Liu, Deutsche Bank AG, Le Yang, Sun Hing Associates LTD., and Vervain Equity Investments Limited. 4. Authorized Claimant means a Class Member whose claim for recovery has been allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. 5. Cash Settlement Amount means $2,750,000 that the Settling Defendants shall cause to be delivered to the Settlement Account pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation. 6. Claim means a completed and signed Proof of Claim submitted to the Claims Administrator in accordance with the instructions on the Proof of Claim. 7. Claimant means a person or entity that submits a Proof of Claim to the Claims Administrator seeking to share in the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund. 8. Claims Administrator means the Garden City Group, Inc., which shall administer the Settlement. 9. Class means all persons or entities who: (i) purchased or otherwise acquired SearchMedia securities between April 1, 2009 and August 20, 2010, inclusive; and/or (ii) held common stock of Ideation on October 2, 2009, and were eligible to vote at Ideation s October 27, 2009, special meeting. Excluded from the Class are Defendants, the officers and directors of Ideation, the officers and directors of SearchMedia, the officers and directors of SearchMedia International Limited, members of Defendants' immediate families and their legal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns and any entity in which Defendants have or had a 2

3 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 3 of 31 controlling interest, China Seed Ventures, L.P., Deutsche Bank AG, Le Yang, Sun Hing Associates LTD., and Vervain Equity Investments Limited. Also excluded from the Class are all persons and entities who submit a valid request for exclusion pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation. 10. Class Distribution Order means a Court order authorizing distribution of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants. 11. Class Member means a person or entity who falls within the definition of the Class, and includes each of their respective past or present officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, attorneys, partners, managers, members, affiliates, subsidiaries, shareholders, spouses, heirs, executors, administrators, representatives, successors and assigns. Persons and entities who submit a valid request for exclusion pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation are not included in the Class. 12. Court means the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 13. Counsel Fees and Expenses means fees and expenses allowed by the Court that are sought and were incurred by Lead Counsel in the prosecution of the Action. 14. Defendants means SearchMedia, Robert Fried, Phillip Frost, Rao Uppaluri, Steven Rubin, Glenn Halpryn, Thomas Beier, David Moskowitz, Shawn Gold, SearchMedia International Limited, Garbo Lee, Qinying Liu, Earl Yen, Jennifer Huang, and Paul Conway. 15. Effective Date means the first day after the Court enters the Order and Final Judgment and either (i) the expiration of any time for review or appeal of the Order and Final Judgment, or (ii) if any appeal is filed and not dismissed, the Order and Final Judgment is upheld on appeal in all material respects and is no longer subject to review upon appeal or review by 3

4 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 4 of 31 writ of certiorari. Any award of Counsel Fees and Expenses, Representative Reimbursement, and/or the approval of any Plan of Allocation shall not be considered a material provision of the Order and Final Judgment, and any appeal of Counsel Fees and Expenses, Representative Reimbursement, or Plan of Allocation shall not delay the Effective Date, and any modification as a result of such appeal shall not be considered a modification of a material term. 16. Escrow Agent means Saxena White P.A. 17. Fairness Hearing means the hearing held by the Court to consider final approval of the Settlement of the Action, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 18. Ideation means Ideation Acquisition Corp. 19. Lead Counsel means the law firms of Saxena White P.A. and Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP. 20. Lead Plaintiff means Noel Upfall. 21. Net Settlement Fund means the Settlement Fund, less any Taxes, Tax Expenses, Notification Costs, Administration Expenses, Counsel Fees and Expenses, Representative Reimbursement, and any other expenses approved by the Court. The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to the Authorized Claimants as provided in this Stipulation. 22. Non-Settling Defendants means SearchMedia International Limited, Garbo Lee, Qinying Liu, Earl Yen, Jennifer Huang, and Paul Conway. 23. Notice means the Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Partial Settlement and Motion for Fairness Hearing, Attorneys Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses, which is to be posted to the Settlement website substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A. 4

5 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 5 of Notification Costs means the costs of identification of Class Members, mailing the Notice to the Class, publication of the Summary Notice, and related duplication and printing costs. 25. Order and Final Judgment means the partial final judgment and order entered by the Court approving the Settlement and dismissing the claims against the Settling Defendants with prejudice, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit F, or any alternative order and judgment entered by the Court which does not result in the election by Lead Counsel and/or Settling Defendants to terminate this Settlement. 26. Postcard Notice means the Postcard Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Partial Settlement and Motion for Fairness Hearing and Award of Attorneys Fees and Expenses, which is to be distributed to Class Members substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B. 27. Preliminary Order means the order, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, which shall provide, among other things, for preliminary approval of the proposed Settlement and a Fairness Hearing by the Court to consider the Settlement and the Notice contemplated to be provided to all reasonably identifiable Class Members. 28. Proof of Claim means the document which is substantially in the form attached to the Notice. 29. Released Parties and Released Party means the Settling Defendants and includes the Settling Defendants and Ideation s directors, officers, employees, agents, consultants, attorneys, accountants, auditors, underwriters, partners, insurers, reinsurers, personal representatives, spouses, issues, heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, assigns, parent corporations, subsidiaries, divisions, and affiliates, or any other individual or 5

6 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 6 of 31 entity in which the Settling Defendants or Ideation had or have a controlling interest. Released Parties shall not be construed to include the Non-Settling Defendants. 30. Representative Reimbursement means the payment that is approved by the Court to be paid to the Lead Plaintiff for reimbursement of his reasonable costs and expenses directly relating to this Action. 31. "SearchMedia" means SearchMedia Holdings Limited (formerly known as Ideation). 32. Settled Claims means any and all claims, debts, demands, rights, causes of action or liabilities, of every nature and description whatsoever, whether fixed or contingent, accrued or unaccrued, liquidated or unliquidated, based in law or equity, or based on any foreign, federal, state, local, statutory or common law, or any other law, rule or regulation (including any claims for violations of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11), including both known claims and Unknown Claims that have been or could have been asserted in any forum by any Class Member, or the successors or assigns of any of them, whether directly, indirectly, derivatively, representatively or in any other capacity against any of the Released Parties, which arise out of, relate to, or are based upon, in any way, directly or indirectly, (a) the allegations, transactions, facts, events, matters, occurrences, acts, representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to, or that could have been asserted in the Action, or (b) the purchase, acquisition, sale, disposition or transfer of Ideation or SearchMedia securities by any Class Member, including without limitation all claims arising out of or relating to any disclosures, public filings, registration statements or other statement by any or all of the Released Parties. Settled Claims does not mean or include claims, if any, against the Released Parties arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1001, et seq., which are not common to all Class Members. Settled Claims 6

7 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 7 of 31 does not include claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement or the terms of this Stipulation. Settled Claims also does not include any claim against the Non-Settling Defendants. 33. Settled Defendants Claims means any and all claims, rights, causes of action or liabilities, of every nature and description whatsoever, whether based in law or equity, on federal, state, local, statutory or common law or any other law, rule or regulation (including any claims for violations of Fed. R. Civ. P. 11), including both known claims and Unknown Claims, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any forum by the Released Parties, or any of them, or the successors and assigns of any of them against the Class Members or their attorneys, which arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the Action. Settled Defendants' Claims does not include claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement or the terms of this Stipulation. Settled Defendants' Claims also does not include the Arbitration Claims. 34. Settlement means the partial settlement of this Action contemplated by this Stipulation. 35. Settlement Account means a trust account at a federally chartered financial institution or successor institution selected by the Escrow Agent. The Settlement Account will be managed by the Escrow Agent. 36. Settlement Fund means all cash, accrued interest, or assets in the Settlement Account. 37. Settling Defendants means SearchMedia, Robert Fried, Phillip Frost, Rao Uppaluri, Steven Rubin, Glenn Halpryn, Thomas Beier, David Moskowitz, and Shawn Gold. 38. Settling Defendants Counsel means Holland & Knight LLP. 7

8 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 8 of Summary Notice means the Summary Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Partial Settlement and Motion for Fairness Hearing and Award of Attorneys Fees and Expenses, for publication in substantially the same form attached as Exhibit C. 40. Taxes shall mean all taxes from any governmental entity (including any estimated taxes, interest, or penalties) arising with respect to the income earned by the Settlement Fund. 41. Tax Expenses shall mean expenses and costs incurred in connection with the preparation, filing or litigation relating to the filing, of appropriate tax returns or related paperwork related to the Settlement. 42. Unknown Claims means any and all Settled Claims that any Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Parties, and any of Settled Defendants Claims that Settling Defendants do not know or suspect to exist in its favor, which if known by him, her, or it might have affected his, her or its decision(s) with respect to the Settlement. With respect to any and all Settled Claims and Settled Defendants Claims, the Released Parties and each Class Member, acting through Lead Counsel, shall each, for themselves and all persons claiming by, through, or on behalf of them, be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Order and Final Judgment shall have expressly waived, any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, that is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Cal. Civ. Code 1542 and Section of the South Dakota Codified Laws, each of which provides that a general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor. 8

9 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 9 of 31 Each Class Member s and the Released Parties successors and assigns and any persons or entities claiming through or on behalf of them shall, by operation of law, be deemed to have acknowledged, that the inclusion of Unknown Claims in the definition of Settled Claims and Settled Defendants Claims was separately bargained for and was a material element of the Settlement and Stipulation. SCOPE AND EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT 43. This Settlement was reached as a result of arms length negotiations and in good faith, undertaken in the context of a voluntary mediation between the Lead Plaintiff and Settling Defendants through the mediation services of Jed D. Melnick, Esq., and reflects a voluntary submission to the terms of the Settlement. 44. The obligations incurred pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in full and final disposition of the Action as against the Settling Defendants, and shall fully and finally release any and all Settled Claims as against all Released Parties and shall also release all Settled Defendants Claims. The Order and Final Judgment shall, among other things, provide for the dismissal with prejudice of the Action against the Settling Defendants, without costs to any party, as such costs are identified in 28 U.S.C The terms of this Stipulation shall not affect the prosecution of any claims in this Action as against the Non-Settling Defendants. 45. Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement, the Class Members, on behalf of themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any other person claiming by, through or on behalf of them, whether or not that Class Member executes and delivers a Proof of Claim or otherwise shares in the Settlement Fund, (a) shall be deemed to have released and discharged all Settled Claims; and (b) shall be enjoined from prosecuting, either directly or indirectly, any Settled Claims against any of the Released Parties. 9

10 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 10 of Upon the Effective Date of this Settlement, the Released Parties, on behalf of themselves, their executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, assigns, and all persons and entities claiming through or on behalf of them, (a) shall be deemed to have released all Settled Defendants Claims; (b) shall be enjoined from prosecuting, either directly or indirectly, any Settled Defendants Claim; and (c) shall forever be enjoined from prosecuting, either directly or indirectly, any action, suit, cause of action, claim or demand against any person or entity who may claim any form of contribution or indemnity from Class Members or their counsel in respect of any Settled Defendants Claim. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph or Stipulation shall preclude the Settling Defendants from continuing to pursue the Arbitration Claims. THE SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION 47. In settlement of all Settled Claims against the Released Parties, and subject only to the terms and conditions of this Stipulation, Settling Defendants shall cause to be paid the Cash Settlement Amount ($2,750,000) into the Settlement Account within 14 days after the later of: (i) the Court s entry of the Preliminary Order; and (ii) the receipt by Settling Defendants of an address for the delivery of a check for the Cash Settlement Amount and the Settlement Account s Form W-9 necessary to effect payment. 48. The Settlement Fund shall be maintained in the Settlement Account from the date it is deposited until it is transferred in accordance with the provisions of this Stipulation or by Order of the Court. The Settlement Account shall be managed by the Escrow Agent. 49. The Net Settlement Fund shall be the sole source of funds for payment of valid Claims to the Class. Class Members will look solely to the Net Settlement Fund for settlement and satisfaction of any and all Settled Claims against the Released Parties. 10

11 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 11 of All Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund prior to distribution to Class Members without need for prior order from the Court. The Escrow Agent shall be obligated to withhold from distribution to Class Members any funds necessary to pay such amounts. The Escrow Agent shall indemnify and hold all Released Parties harmless for any Taxes and Tax Expenses (including without limitation taxes payable by reason of any such indemnification), if any, payable by any Released Party by reason of any income and gains earned on the Settlement Fund. A Released Party shall notify the Escrow Agent promptly if it receives any notice of any claim for Taxes relating to the Settlement Fund. 51. The Escrow Agent shall invest all Settlement Account funds in U.S. government issued securities or guaranteed instruments (or a mutual fund invested solely in such instruments), and shall collect and reinvest all interest accrued thereon. Any funds held in escrow in an amount not to exceed any applicable FDIC limits may be held in an interest-bearing bank account insured by the FDIC. 52. The Settlement Fund is intended to be a Qualified Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.468B-1 and the Escrow Agent, as administrator of the Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.468B-2(k)(3), shall be responsible for filing tax returns for the Settlement Fund and paying from the Settlement Fund any Taxes owed with respect to the Settlement Fund. The Settlement Fund shall be treated as a Qualified Settlement Fund from the earliest date possible, (including any relation-back election required to treat the Settlement Fund as a Qualified Settlement Fund from the earliest date possible). Settling Defendants' Counsel agrees to provide promptly to the Escrow Agent the statement described in Treasury Regulation 1.468B-3(e). 11

12 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 12 of If the Court approves the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation, the Lead Plaintiff and the Settling Defendants shall jointly request that the Court enter a bar order (the "Bar Order") containing all of the following provisions: a) The Non-Settling Defendants and all other persons and entities, including but not limited to any other person or entity later named as a defendant or third-party defendant in this Action, are hereby permanently barred, enjoined and restrained from commencing, prosecuting, or asserting any claim for contribution (whether contractual or otherwise) against the Released Parties or any other claim against the Released Parties where the injury to such entity/individual is any person's or entity's actual or threatened liability to the Lead Plaintiff or any Class Member, including but not limited to any amounts paid in settlement of such actual or threatened liability, or any other costs or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with this Action; provided, however, that a Non-Settling Defendant shall not be barred from pursuing contractual claims against SearchMedia to recover attorneys' fees and costs actually and reasonably incurred in the successful defense of claims asserted against such Non-Settling Defendant in this Action, but only to the extent such contractual claims exist and only to the extent of such Non-Settling Defendant's success. b) The Released Parties are permanently barred, enjoined and restrained from commencing, prosecuting or asserting any claim for contribution (whether contractual or otherwise) against the Non-Settling Defendants or any other claim against the Non-Settling Defendants where the injury to the Released Parties is any person's or entity's actual or threatened liability to the Lead Plaintiff or Class 12

13 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 13 of 31 Members, including but not limited to any amounts paid in settlement of such actual or threatened liability, or any other costs or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with this action; provided, however, that SearchMedia may continue to pursue the Arbitration Claims. ADMINISTRATION OF THE SETTLEMENT 54. The Claims Administrator shall administer the Settlement subject to the supervision, direction, and approval of Lead Counsel and the Court; calculate the Claims submitted by Class Members; and oversee distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. The Claims Administrator shall be responsible for maintaining the Settlement website, distributing the Postcard Notice and Proofs of Claim, and publishing the Summary Notice, respectively. 55. Settling Defendants and Settling Defendants' Counsel shall have no responsibility for, interest in, or liability with respect to the investment or distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, the determination, administration, or calculation of Claims, the payment or withholding of Taxes, the payment of Tax Expenses, the payment of Notification Costs and Administration Expenses, or any losses incurred in connection therewith. 56. No monies will be disbursed from the Settlement Account until after the Effective Date, except: a) Lead Counsel may pay Administration Expenses and Notification Costs as set forth in 57; and b) Lead Counsel may pay Taxes and Tax Expenses as set forth in Lead Counsel may pay Administration Expenses and Notification Costs from the Settlement Fund without prior approval from Settling Defendants' Counsel. Notwithstanding this provision, prior to the Effective Date, Lead Counsel shall not pay more than $100,000 from 13

14 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 14 of 31 the Settlement Fund for such Administration Expenses and Notification Costs without the prior approval of Settling Defendants' Counsel, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 58. Any Class Member who does not submit a valid Proof of Claim will not be entitled to receive any of the proceeds from the Net Settlement Fund but will otherwise be bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement, including the terms of the Order and Final Judgment to be entered in the Action, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims. The Claims Administrator shall provide Lead Counsel with a list of all late-filed, but otherwise adequate Proofs of Claim for consideration by the Court for inclusion in the distribution. 59. The Claims Administrator shall process the Proofs of Claim and, after entry of the Class Distribution Order, distribute the Net Settlement Fund to the Authorized Claimants. 60. For purposes of determining the extent, if any, to which a Class Member shall be entitled to be treated as an Authorized Claimant, the following conditions shall apply: (a) Each Class Member shall submit a Proof of Claim (attached to Exhibit A), supported by sufficient documentary evidence (including proof of the transactions claimed and the losses incurred as a result), or such other documents or proof as the Claims Administrator, in its discretion, may deem acceptable; (b) All Proofs of Claim must be submitted by the date specified in the Notice, unless such period is extended by Order of the Court. All Class Members who fail to timely submit a valid Proof of Claim and all Class Members whose Claims are rejected by the Claims Administrator (or the Court if a timely contest to the rejection is filed), shall be barred from receiving any proceeds from the Net Settlement Fund, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound by the provisions of the Stipulation and 14

15 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 15 of 31 Settlement, including the terms of the Order and Final Judgment to be entered in the Action, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims; (c) Each Proof of Claim shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Claims Administrator, who shall determine in accordance with this Stipulation and the approved Plan of Allocation the extent, if any, to which each Claim shall be allowed, subject to review by the Court pursuant to subparagraph (e) below; (d) Proofs of Claim that do not meet the submission requirements may be rejected. Prior to rejection of a Proof of Claim, the Claims Administrator shall communicate with the Claimant in order to attempt to remedy the curable deficiencies in the Proofs of Claim submitted. The Claims Administrator shall timely notify in writing each Claimant whose Proofs of Claim it proposes to reject in whole or in part, setting forth the reasons therefore, and shall indicate in such notice that the Claimant whose Claim is to be rejected has the right to a review by the Court if the Claimant so desires and complies with the requirements of subparagraph (e) below; (e) If any Claimant whose Claim has been rejected in whole or in part desires to contest such rejection, the Claimant must, within 20 days after the date of mailing of the notice required in subparagraph (d) above, serve the Claims Administrator with a notice and statement of reasons indicating the Claimant s grounds for contesting the rejection along with any supporting documentation, and requesting a review thereof by the Court. If a dispute concerning a Claim cannot be otherwise resolved, Lead Counsel shall thereafter present the request for review to the Court; and 15

16 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 16 of 31 (f) The administrative determinations of the Claims Administrator accepting and rejecting Claims shall be presented to the Court for approval by the Court in the Class Distribution Order. 61. Each Claimant will be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to that Claimant s status as a Class Member, and the validity and amount of the Claimant s Claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Action or Settlement in connection with processing the Proofs of Claim. 62. Payment pursuant to this Stipulation shall be deemed final and conclusive against all Class Members. All Class Members whose Claims are not approved by the Court shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund, but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and the Settlement, including the terms of the Order and Final Judgment to be entered in the Action, and will be barred from bringing any action against the Released Parties concerning the Settled Claims. 63. Lead Counsel shall request that the deadline for submitting exclusions from the Class by potential Class Members be at least 21 days prior to the Fairness Hearing. Copies of all requests for exclusion from the Class received by the Claims Administrator (or other person designated to receive exclusion requests) shall be provided to Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel no later than 21 days prior to the Fairness Hearing. In addition, at the same time, the Claims Administrator shall also deliver to Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel a report of all exclusion requests received setting forth (i) the number of exclusion requests received; (ii) the name, address and telephone number of persons or entities requesting exclusion; and (iii) the number of shares subject to such exclusion requests. In that report, the 16

17 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 17 of 31 Claims Administrator shall indicate which exclusion requests, if any, appear to fail to meet the requirements for obtaining exclusion from the Class as set forth in the Notice and therefore appear to be defective. The Claims Administrator s report is for convenience only and any conclusions in it shall not be binding on Lead Counsel, the Class Members, or Settling Defendants. 64. The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants by the Claims Administrator only after the Effective Date and after: (i) all Claims have been processed, and all Claimants whose Claims have been rejected or disallowed, in whole or in part, have been notified and provided the opportunity to be heard concerning such rejection or disallowance; (ii) all objections with respect to all rejected or disallowed Claims have been resolved by the Court, and all appeals therefrom have been resolved or the time therefor has expired; (iii) all appeals have been resolved or the time therefor has expired; and (iv) all costs of administration have been paid. 65. If, after 6 months from the date of distribution of the Net Settlement Fund (whether by reason of tax refunds, uncashed checks or otherwise) (the Reallocation Date ), there is a balance greater than 2% of the Cash Settlement Amount remaining in the Net Settlement Fund, the Claims Administrator shall reallocate the balance among Authorized Claimants in an equitable and economic fashion, but only to those Authorized Claimants who have cashed their first distribution check and would receive at least $10.00 from the reallocation. Any balance which still remains in the Net Settlement Fund four (4) months after the Reallocation Date (whether any reallocation was necessary), shall be donated to secular nonprofit organization(s) qualifying under Internal Revenue Code 501(c) as designated jointly by Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel. 17

18 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 18 of 31 COUNSEL FEES AND EXPENSES 66. Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for an award from the Settlement Fund of attorneys fees not to exceed one-third of the Settlement Fund, and for reimbursement of actual expenses, plus any interest earned on such fees and expenses at the same rate and for the same period earned by the Settlement Fund (until paid) as may be awarded by the Court. Representative Reimbursement shall be paid only if ordered by the Court. The Released Parties will not take any position on such applications. 67. Should the Court award any Counsel Fees and Expenses, Lead Counsel shall be permitted to withdraw all awarded fees and expenses from the Settlement Fund 31 days after the entry of the Order and Final Judgment. If the Settlement is thereafter terminated pursuant to the terms of paragraphs 77-78, Lead Counsel will return to Settling Defendants all previously awarded fees or expenses paid, plus interest actually earned, within 7 business days of the termination of the Settlement. If, as a result of any appeal or further proceedings on remand, or successful collateral attack, the award of attorneys fees and/or actual expenses is reduced or reversed pursuant to a final court order, Lead Counsel will return to Settling Defendants the amount of previously awarded fees and expenses, plus interest actually earned, that are not ultimately approved or sustained on appeal or pursuant to further proceedings on remand, within 7 business days of the appropriate order, decision or judgment. Lead Counsel's obligation to return all previously awarded fees or expenses paid, plus interest actually earned, as set forth in this paragraph shall be joint and several between the law firms of Saxena White P.A. and Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP. Lead Counsel may allocate the Counsel Fees and Expenses among other counsel in a manner in which they in good faith believe reflects the contributions of such counsel to the initiation, prosecution, and resolution of the Action, provided, however, that Lead 18

19 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 19 of 31 Counsel may not distribute any Counsel Fees and Expenses to other counsel until the Effective Date. 68. The Settlement is not in any way conditioned upon the Court's award of Counsel Fees and Expenses or Representative Reimbursement. Moreover, the procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the Court of any applications for Counsel Fees and Expenses or Representative Reimbursement is to be considered by the Court separately from the Court s consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceedings relating to such applications, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Order and Final Judgment approving the Stipulation and the Settlement. 69. Settling Defendants and Settling Defendants' Counsel shall have no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever, with respect to: a) any payment to Lead Plaintiff or Lead Counsel or any other counsel or person who receives payment from the Settlement Fund; or b) the allocation among Lead Counsel and other counsel and/or any other person who may assert some claim thereto, of any fee and expense award that the Court may make in the Action, and Settling Defendants take no position with respect to such matters. DISTRIBUTION TO AUTHORIZED CLAIMANTS 70. Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for an order approving the Claims Administrator s determinations concerning the acceptance and rejection of the Claims submitted, and approving any fees and expenses not previously applied for (including the fees and expenses 19

20 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 20 of 31 of the Claims Administrator), and if the Effective Date has occurred, directing payment of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants. 71. The Claims Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim, as defined in the Plan of Allocation that is approved by the Court. Each Authorized Claimant shall be allocated a pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based on that Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim compared to the total Recognized Claims of all Authorized Claimants. 72. The Plan of Allocation is not a necessary term of this Stipulation and it is not a condition of this Stipulation that any particular Plan of Allocation be approved. 73. The Released Parties shall not be entitled to get back any of the settlement monies on or after the Effective Date. TERMS OF PRELIMINARY ORDER 74. Promptly after this Stipulation has been fully executed, Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel shall jointly apply to the Court for entry of a Preliminary Order, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D. TERMS OF ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT 75. If the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation is preliminarily approved by the Court, Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel shall request that the Court enter an Order and Final Judgment substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 76. Simultaneously with the execution of the Stipulation, Lead Counsel and Settling Defendants' Counsel are executing a Supplemental Agreement setting forth certain conditions under which this Settlement may be terminated by Settling Defendants if Class Members who, as 20

21 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 21 of 31 determined from their valid requests for exclusion, held in excess of a certain number of shares of Ideation or SearchMedia securities, validly exclude themselves from the Class. The Supplemental Agreement shall not be filed with the Court unless required by the Court or a dispute arises as to its terms. In the event of a termination of this Settlement pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement, this Stipulation shall be void, except that the provisions of shall apply. Notwithstanding this, the Stipulation shall not become null and void as a result of the election by the Settling Defendants to exercise their option to withdraw from the Stipulation pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement until the conditions set forth in the Supplemental Agreement have been satisfied. WAIVER OR TERMINATION 77. Settling Defendants or Lead Counsel shall have the right to terminate the Settlement and this Stipulation by providing written notice of their election to do so to all other parties to the Stipulation within 30 days of: (a) the Court s refusal to enter the Preliminary Order in any material respect without leave to resubmit the Settlement for preliminary approval in a form that Settling Defendants and Lead Counsel, on behalf of the Class Members, agree upon; (b) the Court s refusal to approve this Stipulation or any material part of it; (c) the Court's refusal to enter the Bar Order contained in paragraph 53 above; (d) the Court s refusal to enter the Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement; (e) the date upon which the Order and Final Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court; (f) Settling Defendants election to withdraw from the Settlement pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement; or (g) Settling Defendants refusal to enter into a litigation release with their insurers in a mutually acceptable form. However, any decision with respect to an application for Counsel Fees and Expenses or Representative 21

22 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 22 of 31 Reimbursement, or with respect to any Plan of Allocation, shall not be considered material to the Settlement or this Stipulation and shall not be grounds for termination. 78. Except as otherwise provided by this Stipulation, in the event the Settlement is terminated, then the parties to this Stipulation shall be deemed to have reverted to their respective statuses in the Action as of September 21, 2011 and, except as otherwise expressly provided: a) The parties to this Stipulation shall proceed in all respects as if this Stipulation and any related Judgments or Orders entered by the Court are vacated, nunc pro tunc; b) Neither the facts nor the specific terms of the Stipulation or Settlement shall be admissible in any action or proceeding; and c) The Settlement Fund and any interest earned on it, less any Taxes, Tax Expenses, Administration Expenses and Notification Costs shall be returned to Settling Defendants within 7 business days of the termination of the Settlement. If the Administration Expenses and Notification Costs deducted from the Settlement Fund exceed $100,000 and the Settling Defendants' Counsel did not approve such excessive deductions, Lead Counsel shall be obligated to reimburse the Settlement Fund for the amount deducted in excess of $100,000. At the written request of Settling Defendants' Counsel, the Escrow Agent or its designee shall apply for any tax refund owed to the Settlement Fund and pay the proceeds, after deduction of any Tax Expenses, to Settling Defendants. NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING 22

23 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 23 of Settling Defendants expressly deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability asserted against them in the Action. Settling Defendants also deny the allegations that Lead Plaintiff or the Class have suffered damage arising out of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions to act of the Settling Defendants, or that Lead Plaintiff or the Class were harmed by the conduct of the Settling Defendants alleged in the Action. Nonetheless, Settling Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the Action against them would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the claims asserted against them in the Action be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. Settling Defendants also have taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Action. Settling Defendants have therefore determined that it is desirable and beneficial to them that the claims asserted against them in the Action be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. 80. Lead Plaintiff believes that the claims asserted in the Action have merit and that the evidence developed to date supports the claims. However, Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Action against the Settling Defendants through trial and through appeals. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have also taken into account the uncertain outcome and the risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Action, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Lead Plaintiff has therefore determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the claims against the Settling Defendants be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation. 81. This Stipulation, whether or not consummated, and any proceedings taken pursuant to it: 23

24 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 24 of 31 (a) shall not be offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of, or construed to be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or admission by the Released Parties with respect to the truth of any fact alleged in the Action or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action, or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in the Action, or of any liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of the Released Parties; (b) shall not be offered or received against the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to any statement or written document approved or made by any of the Released Parties; (c) shall not be offered or received against any of the Released Parties as evidence of a presumption, concession or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault or wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Released Parties, in any other civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation; provided, however, that if this Stipulation is approved by the Court, the Released Parties may refer to it to effectuate the liability protection granted them hereunder; (d) shall not be construed against any of the Released Parties as an admission or concession that the consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial; and (e) shall not be construed as or received in evidence as an admission, concession or presumption against any of the Class Members that any of their claims are 24

25 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 25 of 31 without merit, or that any defenses asserted by Settling Defendants have any merit, or that damages recoverable under the Complaint would not have exceeded the Settlement Fund. OBLIGATIONS OF THE RELEASED PARTIES 82. Settling Defendants shall be obligated to cause to be paid the Cash Settlement Amount into the Settlement Account. Settling Defendants and Settling Defendants' Counsel shall also cooperate in the production of information with respect to the identification of Class Members from Ideation s and SearchMedia's records. 83. Except as specifically provided by the terms of this Stipulation or otherwise mandated by law, the Released Parties shall have no obligation or responsibility in connection with providing Notice to the Class, the administration of the Settlement or the Claims process, the investment or administration of the Settlement Fund, the payment of Taxes or Tax Expenses from the Settlement Fund, reviewing or challenging Proofs of Claim submitted to the Claims Administrator, or disbursement of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants, and shall have no liability whatsoever to any person, including, but not limited to, the Class Members, in connection with any such function or responsibility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Settling Defendants shall be responsible for providing any and all notifications required under 28 U.S.C Settling Defendants agree that, in the event Lead Plaintiff pursues this Action against the Non-Settling Defendants, any discovery requests issued in this Action by Lead Plaintiff may be served upon Settling Defendants through Settling Defendants' Counsel, but Settling Defendants reserve all their rights to object to, or otherwise challenge, such discovery requests. 25

26 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 26 of 31 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 85. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over all parties to the Settlement (including all Claimants and Class Members) and all matters relating to the Settlement, and shall retain exclusive jurisdiction to interpret the scope of the Bar Order contained in paragraph 53 above. 86. All of the exhibits attached to this Stipulation and the Supplemental Agreement referenced herein are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 87. If a case is commenced in respect of any Released Party contributing the Cash Settlement Amount under Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, or a trustee, receiver or conservator is appointed under any similar law, and in the event of the entry of a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction determining the transfer to the Settlement Account or any portion thereof by or on behalf of such Released Party to be a preference, voidable transfer, fraudulent transfer or similar transaction and any portion thereof is required to be returned, and such amount is not promptly deposited to the Settlement Account by others, then, at the election of Lead Counsel, the parties shall jointly move the Court to vacate and set aside the releases given and Judgment entered in favor of the Settling Defendants pursuant to this Stipulation, which releases and Judgment shall be void, and the parties shall be restored to their respective positions in the litigation as of September 21, 2011 and any cash amounts in the Settlement Account shall be returned within 7 business days. 88. The parties to this Stipulation agree that, other than disclosures required by law, any public comments from the parties regarding this resolution will not substantially deviate from words to the effect that the parties have reached a mutually acceptable resolution by way of a mediated settlement that will avoid protracted and expensive litigation, and that the parties are satisfied with this resolution. Settling Defendants retain the right to deny that the claims 26

27 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/30/2011 Page 27 of 31 advanced in the Action against them were meritorious and that they have retained the right to continue prosecuting the Arbitration Claims. 89. This Stipulation may not be modified or amended, nor may any of its provisions be waived except by a writing signed by all parties or their successors-in-interest, or by Order of the Court. 90. The headings in this Stipulation are used for the purpose of convenience only and are not meant to have legal effect. 91. The waiver by one party of any breach of this Stipulation by any other party shall not be deemed a waiver of any other prior or subsequent breach of this Stipulation. 92. This Stipulation and its exhibits, and the Supplemental Agreement, constitute the entire agreement among the parties to this Stipulation concerning the Settlement of the Action, and no representations, warranties, or inducements have been made by any party hereto concerning this Stipulation and its exhibits and the Supplemental Agreement other than those contained and memorialized in such documents. 93. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. 94. This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties to it. 95. The construction, interpretation, operation, effect and validity of this Stipulation, and all documents necessary to effectuate it, shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Florida without regard to conflicts of laws, except to the extent that Federal law requires that Federal law governs. 27

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv KMW SID MURDESHWAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA v. Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:11-cv-20549-KMW SEARCHMEDIA HOLDINGS LTD.,

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs.

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiffs, vs. Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF AUSTIN POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1

Case: 3:03-cv WHR Doc #: Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 1033 EXHIBIT 1 Case: 3:03-cv-00015-WHR Doc #: 105-2 Filed: 06/11/08 Page: 2 of 31 PAGEID #: 1034 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Case 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS Document 122 Filed 09/14/15 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 3581 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND RICHARD MEDOFF, Individually and On ) No. 1:09-cv-00554-JNL-PAS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:11-cv-02400-RWS Document 72-5 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) CIVIL ACTION NO. IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAROLYN LYNN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ARTHUR F. HELF, H. LAMAR COX, MICHAEL

More information

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:14-cv SI Document Filed 07/10/17 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-si Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re MONTAGE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Case 4:05-cv RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:05-cv-00078-RAS-DDB Document 74-1 Filed 10/09/2006 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PLA, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. x : : : : : : : x STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. x : : : : : : : x STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:05-cv-00686-JTC Document 66 Filed 03/07/2008 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION In re CHOICEPOINT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-60661-CIV-DIMITROULEAS In re DS Healthcare Group, Inc. Securities Litigation / STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HENRY LACE on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 3:12-CV-00363-JD-CAN ) v. )

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of December 18, 2015 (the

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated as of December 18, 2015 (the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 1:12-cv-03852-GBD STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and

More information

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:08-cv KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:08-cv-00264-KMK Document 73-1 Filed 09/06/11 Page 2 of 95 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK STIPULATION AND

More information

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT JOSEPH AND PATRICIA MARRARI, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN

More information

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

[~DJ FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 130 Filed 07/24/15 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-08066-JGK Document 108-6 Filed 12/17/14 Page 2 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OKLAHOMA POLICE

More information

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARTHUR MENALDI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, -against-

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249

More information

Case: 1:02-cv Document #: 2213 Filed: 06/20/16 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:86180 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:02-cv Document #: 2213 Filed: 06/20/16 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:86180 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:02-cv-05893 Document #: 2213 Filed: 06/20/16 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:86180 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LAWRENCE E. JAFFE PENSION PLAN, On Behalf of

More information

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-0-rsm Document 0- Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Atossa Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No. -cv-0-rsm 0 STIPULATION AND

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

Case 3:10-cv ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:10-cv ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:10-cv-00132-ECR -WGC Document 97 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 34 LAW OFFICES OF MARK WRAY Mark Wray 608 Lander Street Reno, Nevada 89509 Telephone: (775) 348-8877 BERNSTEIN LIEBHARD LLP Sandy A. Liebhard

More information

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x

x : : : : : : : : : : : : x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS BRICKLAYERS AND MASONS TRUST FUNDS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No VCL

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, C.A. No VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated shareholders of Landry s Restaurants, Inc.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAREER EDUCATION ) CORPORATION SECURITIES ) LITIGATION ) No. 03 C 8884 Honorable Joan Humphrey Lefkow STIPULATION

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation ) is entered into among plaintiffs 0 0 This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the Stipulation is entered into among plaintiffs Richard Layne, Julietta Teratsouian and Carole Carpenter (collectively Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 8:10-cv-00199-JFB-TDT Doc # 97-1 Filed: 04/30/12 Page 1 of 37 - Page ID # 1394 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DAVID G. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:14-cv WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:14-cv-81156-WPD Document 251 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : Case No. 02-CV-271 IN RE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, : INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : JUDGE CERCONE : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26

Case4:09-cv CW Document125 Filed04/28/11 Page1 of 26 Case4:09-cv-03362-CW Document1 Filed04//11 Page1 of 1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (3113) DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM (24863 1) 3 Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800

More information

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I Case 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM Document 1457 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I u:nu ATl\'J!~O'd.L)J 'l J 1 J~'.ll'JO:XXl : " \ (J

More information

0:15-cv MGL Date Filed 02/15/18 Entry Number 163 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

0:15-cv MGL Date Filed 02/15/18 Entry Number 163 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION 0:15-cv-02393-MGL Date Filed 02/15/18 Entry Number 163 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV, Individually and on Behalf of All

More information

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296

Case 5:12-cv SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 Case 5:12-cv-05162-SOH Document 457 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12296 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

More information

Case 5:17-cv LHK Document 74 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv LHK Document 74 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 46 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case :-cv-00-lhk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE YAHOO! INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:10-cv-04841-FLW-DEA Document 131 Filed 11/21/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 2942 Case 3:10 -cv-04841 - ELW- DEA Document 127-1 Filed 11/20/13 Page 1 of 8 PagelD: 2917 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually ) and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANNMARIE MALLOZZI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CASE No.: 07-CV-10321 (GBD) INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES

More information

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No.

More information

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 1:06-cv PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Case 1:06-cv-12967-PAC Document 88 Filed 02/28/13 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PANTHER PARTNERS INC., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:12-cv-00829-VEH Document 110 Filed 07/15/15 Page 1 of 50 FILED 2015 Jul-15 PM 04:21 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

Case 1:09-cv SHS Document 50-1 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 91 EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:09-cv SHS Document 50-1 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 91 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:09-cv-07359-SHS Document 50-1 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 91 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:09-cv-07359-SHS Document 50-1 Filed 01/22/14 Page 2 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS LEWIS F. GEER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 01-2583-JAR ) WILLIAM D. COX, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) DAVID GROGAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case

More information

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34. x : : : : : : : : : : : x Case 116-cv-03925-LLS Document 50 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONALD P. BOLAND and MARY A. BOLAND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

Case 1:05-cv LAP Document Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of x : : : : : : : ----x STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

Case 1:05-cv LAP Document Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of x : : : : : : : ----x STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:05-cv-04186-LAP Document 116-2 Filed 05/27/08 Page 1 of 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE R&G FINANCIAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document relates

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH COMPANY AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS Case 1:08-cv-02940-AT Document 111-3 Filed 12/21/11 Page 2 of 128 In re CARTER S, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-2940-AT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:13-cv YGR Document 126 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ygr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK NATHANSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

LZ D. ea r. JUL MART/Al C. l 0 i 2003 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI S IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION

LZ D. ea r. JUL MART/Al C. l 0 i 2003 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI S IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DIVISION tits' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI S GEORGE TATZ, individually and on behal f of all others similarly situated, EASTERN DIVISION Civil Action No. 01 C 8440 ea

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 94-2 Filed 11/13/15 Pg 110 of 121 Pg ID 3379 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Exhibit B NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement ( Agreement or Settlement ) is entered into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-01599-TWP-DML Document 98 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION In re ITT EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, INC. CASE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 8:15-CV FMO-AFM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 8:15-CV FMO-AFM Case 8:15-cv-01973-FMO-AFM Document 122 Filed 08/25/17 Page 1 of 69 Page ID #:3885 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION SHERI DODGE and NEIL DODGE, and RAM AGRAWAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:14-cv-00182-HE Document 91 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STAMPS BROTHERS OIL & GAS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-14-0182-HE

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x

Case 1:16-cv PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45. x : : : : : : : x Case 1:16-cv-02758-PKC Document 120 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re THIRD AVENUE MANAGEMENT LLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates

More information

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT COMPROMISE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Compromise and Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into between Reorganized Adelphia Communications Corporation ( ACC ) and its affiliated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Final Approval Hearing

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants

More information

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1

Case 1:14-cv AKH Document Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115. Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 1 of 115 Exhibit 1 Case 1:14-cv-02392-AKH Document 152-1 Filed 06/21/17 Page 2 of 115 EXECUTION VERSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE MBIA, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 08-CV-264-KMK NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 14, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS VACATION FUND, et al., v. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP, PLC, et al.

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Case 2:05cv00204DB Document 1053 Red 11/07/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Exhibit B IN RE imergent SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No.: 2:05-cv-0204

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Case 1:10-cv-00378-LPS-MPT Document 287 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 39 PagelD #: 5942 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE HECKMANN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case

More information

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS EFiled: Jan 17 2018 03:59PM EST Transaction ID 61579740 Case No. 12619-CB Exhibit A IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC. C.A.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 3:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION. Civil Action No. 3: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION In re DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Civil Action No. 3:05-0077 Judge

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case CIV WPD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In re: Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. Securities Litigation Case 14 81156 CIV WPD NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF

More information

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER. into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated March 11, 2016, as amended on June 13,

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AND ORDER. into a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, dated March 11, 2016, as amended on June 13, Case 1:11-cv-00733-WHP Document 375-1 376 Filed 12/30/16 12/29/16 Page 1 of of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL : CIVIL ACTION NO. EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement )

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement ) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement or the Agreement ) is entered into as of August 28, 2017, by and among James F. Pauley ( Plaintiff ),

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE RECITALS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release (the Agreement ) is made and entered into by and among the Representative Plaintiff, Monique Wilson (the

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. ("Denbury" or "Defendant") shares pursuant to the merger of

Plaintiff, Defendant. for Denbury Resources, Inc. (Denbury or Defendant) shares pursuant to the merger of Case 1:10-cv-01917-JG-VVP Document 143 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 9369 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELI BENSINGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND ITS DIVISION OF INVESTMENT, on behalf of itself and all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i!

1,=-= := usns son~ 1,.!oocume?~t  LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i! Case 1:14-cv-06046-JGK Document 142 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 10 1,=-= :=---- --- 1 usns son~ 1,.!oocuME?~T " LEl'TRONICALLY fl.led i! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU - \! SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO OC ~: ---r.:;;t;;.,.---

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN Davidson v. Henkel Corporation et al Doc. 157 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN B. DAVIDSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

More information

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information