SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest"

Transcription

1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT B. CATELL, ANDREA CHRISTENSEN, ROBERT J. FANI, ALAN H. FISHMAN, JAMES R. JONES, JAMES L. LAROCCA, GLORIA C. LARSON, STEPHEN W. MCKESSY, EDWARD D. MILLER, VIKKI L. PRYOR, KEYSPAN CORPORATION, and NATIONAL GRID PLC, Defendants. TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR, AND APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL FOR AN AWARD OF FEES AND EXPENSES ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO OWNED (BENEFICIALLY OR OTHERWISE) THE COMMON STOCK OF KEYSPAN CORPORATION AT ANY TIME DURING THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 12, 2004 THROUGH AND INCLUDING OCTOBER 20, 2006 (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS PERIOD ). PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AND IN ITS ENTIRETY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION AND CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR RIGHTS. YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS LITIGATION. IF THE COURT APPROVES THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, THE SETTLEMENT CLASS WILL BE FOREVER BARRED FROM CONTESTING THE FAIRNESS, REASONABLENESS OR ADEQUACY OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, OR FROM PURSUING ANY OF THE SETTLED CLAIMS. THE COURT HAS MADE NO FINDINGS OR DETERMINATIONS RESPECTING THE MERITS OF THIS CASE. THE RECITATION OF THE BACKGROUND AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE SETTLEMENT CONTAINED HEREIN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE THE FINDINGS OF THE COURT. IT IS BASED ON REPRESENTATIONS MADE TO THE COURT BY COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES. IF YOU WERE THE RECORD OWNER, BUT NOT THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF KEYSPAN CORPORATION COMMON STOCK DURING THE SETTLEMENT CLASS PERIOD, PLEASE TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER(S) FOR WHOM YOU HELD SUCH COMMON STOCK. THIS NOTICE IS GIVEN pursuant to an Order of the Court (the Preliminary Approval Order ) entered in the above-captioned class action (the Action ) brought on behalf of persons and entities who owned shares of common stock of KeySpan Corporation. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the proposed settlement of the Action (the Settlement ), and of a hearing (the Settlement Fairness Hearing ) to be held before the Honorable Justice Carolyn E. Demarest in Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, Commercial Division, Room 756, 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York at 10:00 a.m. on April 24, The purpose of the Settlement Fairness Hearing is: (1) to determine whether the proposed Settlement, as set forth in a Stipulation of Compromise

2 and Settlement entered into by the parties to the Action and dated as of October 20, 2006 (the Stipulation ), is fair, reasonable, adequate, in the best interests of the Settlement Class (defined below) and should be approved by the Court; (2) to determine whether a judgment should be entered in the Action pursuant to the proposed Settlement that will, among other things, dismiss the Action with prejudice and release the Released Claims (as defined below); (3) to consider the application of Plaintiff s counsel for an award of attorneys fees and expenses; and (4) to consider such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. DESCRIPTION OF THE LITIGATION 1. This action arises from the proposed acquisition of KeySpan Corporation ( KeySpan ), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, by National Grid plc ( National Grid ), a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the Merger ). The defendants are Robert B. Catell, Andrea Christensen, Robert J. Fani, Alan H. Fishman, James R. Jones, James L. Larocca, Gloria C. Larson, Stephen W. McKessy, Edward D. Miller, Vikki L. Pryor, and KeySpan (the KeySpan Defendants ), and National Grid (together with the KeySpan Defendants, the Defendants ). 2. KeySpan operates natural gas utilities in New York, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and is the largest distributor of natural gas in the Northeast region of the United States. National Grid is an international energy delivery company with principal activities in the regulated electricity and natural gas industries. It transmits and distributes electricity and natural gas to nearly four million customers in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York and Rhode Island. 3. The individual defendants are members of KeySpan s ten-member Board of Directors, positions which they held during the Settlement Class Period. Eight of those directors are outside directors who are not employed by KeySpan. 4. On or about February 27, 2006, KeySpan announced that it had entered into an agreement with National Grid (the Merger Agreement ), pursuant to which KeySpan would be acquired by National Grid in a merger in which KeySpan shareholders would receive $42 per share in cash for their shares of KeySpan common stock, subject to shareholder and regulatory approvals. 5. On or about March 20, 2006, plaintiff Adele Brody ( Plaintiff ) commenced the Action on behalf of a class consisting of all holders of KeySpan common stock against the KeySpan Defendants, alleging that the individual defendants had breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to the Merger at an allegedly inadequate price and that KeySpan had aided and abetted those breaches. The Action sought, among other relief, an order preliminarily and permanently enjoining the Merger from proceeding. 6. On or about April 19, 2006, the KeySpan Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint in the Action on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. 7. On or about April 28, 2006, KeySpan filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) a preliminary proxy statement (the Preliminary Proxy ) concerning the Merger. 8. On or about May 26, 2006, after review of the Merger Agreement and Preliminary Proxy, Plaintiff served an amended complaint (the Amended Complaint ) adding National Grid as a defendant in the Action, alleging that National Grid aided and abetted the alleged breaches of fiduciary duties by the KeySpan Defendants, and adding claims of inadequate disclosure with respect to the Preliminary Proxy due to the alleged omission of allegedly material information in the Preliminary Proxy which Plaintiff contended was necessary in order for KeySpan shareholders to make an informed decision concerning the Merger. 9. Thereafter, counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants engaged in good faith discussions concerning the possible settlement of the Action. Among other things, Plaintiff s counsel urged in these discussions that additional particularized disclosures concerning the background and principal events leading to the execution of the Merger Agreement between KeySpan and National Grid needed to be included in KeySpan s proxy materials in order for KeySpan shareholders to make an informed decision concerning whether to vote in favor of or against the proposed Merger. 10. On or about June 15, 2006, KeySpan filed a revised draft of its proxy materials containing additional disclosures concerning the background and principal events leading to the execution of the Merger Agreement. Plaintiff s counsel reviewed the additional disclosures and provided additional written comments thereon to Defendants counsel, certain of which were incorporated in the final version of KeySpan s proxy materials mailed on or about July 11, 2006 to KeySpan shareholders in connection with the Merger. 2

3 11. On or about June 28, 2006, in consideration of the additional disclosures and the opportunity to provide further comments thereon, Plaintiff s counsel and Defendants counsel entered into a Memorandum of Understanding providing for the settlement of the Action on the terms set forth therein, subject to the completion by Plaintiff s counsel of confirmatory discovery, the approval of the Court and certain other conditions. 12. On August 17, 2006, KeySpan publicly announced that the Merger had been overwhelmingly approved by its shareholders at its annual meeting held that day. 13. Plaintiff s counsel subsequently completed confirmatory discovery, and the parties thereafter entered into a Stipulation of Compromise and Settlement dated as of October 20, 2006 (the Stipulation ) providing for the Settlement of this Action on the terms and subject to the conditions described below. 14. Plaintiff s counsel have conducted a thorough investigation into the facts and law relating to the Action and have fully analyzed and evaluated the merits of all parties contentions and the proposed Settlement as it impacts each of the parties, including the individual members of the Settlement Class. Plaintiff s counsel represent that they also have evaluated the risks, delay and difficulties in establishing liability, the relief that might be available in the event that liability was established, and the likelihood that the litigation could be further protracted and expensive. 15. The Defendants vigorously dispute and deny each and every one of Plaintiff s allegations, which they believe to be entirely without merit, and have determined to enter into this Settlement solely for the purpose of avoiding further burden, expense and inconvenience of this Action. The KeySpan Defendants have further determined that the Settlement of the Action on the terms set forth in the Stipulation is in the best interests of KeySpan and its shareholders. 16. All parties and their counsel agree that the proposed Settlement is fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. 17. The Settlement is subject to the approval of the Court, following the Settlement Fairness Hearing, as described in the section of this Notice captioned Notice of Fairness Hearing and Rights of Settlement Class Members, below. The principal terms, conditions and other matters that are part of the proposed Settlement are summarized below. This summary should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the text of the Stipulation, which has been filed with the Court. PRINCIPAL TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 18. Plaintiff, on behalf of the Settlement Class (as defined below), has agreed to the full and complete settlement of the Action, and any and all claims asserted, or which could have been asserted, therein, or which arise out of or are in any way related to any of the acts, facts, transactions, occurrences or claims set forth therein, in consideration of (a) KeySpan s inclusion in its final proxy materials disseminated to KeySpan shareholders in connection with the Merger of the additional disclosures contained therein concerning the background and principal events leading to the execution of the Merger Agreement between KeySpan and National Grid, (b) KeySpan s agreement and fulfillment of that agreement to accept certain comments and suggested changes thereon provided by Plaintiff s counsel, (c) KeySpan s agreement and fulfillment of that agreement to permit Plaintiff s counsel to review the final proxy materials and submit additional comments thereon before such materials were disseminated to KeySpan shareholders, and (d) KeySpan s agreement and fulfillment of that agreement to permit Plaintiff s counsel to conduct specific document and deposition discovery to confirm the fairness of the Merger as to both its substance and procedure. 19. Defendants have agreed, solely for the purpose of effectuating the Settlement, that the Action may be maintained as a class action on behalf of a class (the Settlement Class ) defined as all persons and entities who owned (beneficially or otherwise) the common stock of KeySpan at any time during the period from November 12, 2004 through and including October 20, 2006, excluding Defendants, members of the Defendants immediate families, any entities in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, any entities that are a parent or subsidiary of or are controlled by KeySpan or National Grid, and any affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors and assigns of any of the Defendants. The Preliminary Approval Order provides that the Settlement Class shall be a non-opt out class with respect to all claims for injunctive, declaratory, and other equitable relief. Members of the Settlement Class may opt out solely to preserve any right to pursue potential claims for monetary damages, but will otherwise be bound by the Settlement s terms. Those persons (if any) who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to this Notice are excluded from the Settlement Class solely with respect to any right they may have to pursue potential claims for monetary damages. 3

4 20. The Stipulation provides that, if the Settlement is approved by the Court, a judgment will be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice, and containing a broad release applicable to the Plaintiff, both individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class, and all other members of the Settlement Class. The full text of the release is as follows: 1 Any and all claims, demands, rights, actions or causes of action, liabilities, damages, losses, attorneys fees, costs, expenses, obligations, duties, judgments, suits, proceedings, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, executions, matters and issues of any kind whatsoever, whether in law or equity, and whether direct, indirect, individual, representative or derivative, known or unknown, from the beginning of time to the present, including but not limited to those arising under federal, state, local, statutory or common law, or any other rule or regulation, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, known or unknown, accrued or not accrued, contingent or absolute, apparent or unapparent, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed, liquidated or unliquidated, including but not limited to those relating to any alleged fraud, breach of any duty, negligence, gross negligence and/or the disclosure or non-disclosure of any fact or matter, whether or not asserted, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any other action, proceeding, suit, or matter against Defendants or their respective family members, heirs, executors, administrators, successors, assigns, present and former employees, officers, directors, attorneys, legal representatives, and agents of each of them, and any person or entity which is or was related to or affiliated with any Defendant or which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest and the present and former parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, predecessors, successors, employees, officers, directors, attorneys, assigns, and agents of each of them, and any other current or former directors, officers, or employees of any Defendant, regardless of whether such person was served with process and appeared in this Action (collectively, the Released Persons ), which have or could have arisen or arise at any time, and relate in any manner to, the allegations, facts, events, transactions, acts, occurrences, statements, representations, misrepresentations, omissions, acts or failures to act, course of conduct, or any other matter, thing or cause whatsoever, or any series thereof, embraced, involved, set forth, or otherwise related, directly or indirectly, to the facts and circumstances alleged or that could have been alleged in the complaint and/or the amended complaint in this Action (collectively, the Released Claims ) are fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, discharged, dismissed with prejudice and released with full preclusive effect as to each of the Released Persons; provided, however, that the claims to be released do not include the right of any members of the Settlement Class or any of the Defendants to enforce the terms of the Settlement. Plaintiff and each member of the Settlement Class, on behalf of themselves, their successors and assigns, and any other person claiming (now or in the future) through or on behalf of them, has, and by operation of this Judgment covenants not to sue the Released Persons with respect to all such Released Claims, and are permanently barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, prosecuting or asserting any Released Claim against any Released Person. With respect to any and all Released Claims, Plaintiff expressly waives and relinquishes, and each of the members of the Settlement Class waives and relinquishes, and by operation of this Judgment waives and relinquishes, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights, and benefits of California Civil Code Section 1542 (to the extent it applies to the Action), which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. Also, with respect to any and all Released Claims, Plaintiff further expressly waives and relinquishes, and each of the members of the Settlement Class waives and relinquishes, and by 1 Capitalized terms used in the release have the meanings defined in the Stipulation, which are the same as in this Notice. In particular, the term Defendants means Robert B. Catell, Andrea Christensen, Robert J. Fani, Alan H. Fishman, James R. Jones, James J. Larocca, Gloria C. Larson, Stephen W. McKessy, Edward D. Miller, Vikki L. Pryor, KeySpan Corporation and National Grid plc. The term Plaintiff means Adele Brody. 4

5 operation of this Judgment waives and relinquishes, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any and all provisions, rights and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, that is similar, comparable, or equivalent in effect to California Civil Code Section 1542 or that would otherwise act to limit the effectiveness or scope of this release. Plaintiff and the members of the Settlement Class expressly acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those that any of them or their counsel now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims or otherwise, which, if known might have affected the decision to enter into this stipulation, but stipulate and agree that Plaintiff has, and each member of the Settlement Class has, and by operation of this Judgment has, fully, finally, and forever settled and released any and all Released Claims, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not concealed or hidden, that now exist or heretofore have existed, upon any theory of law or equity now existing or coming into existence in the future including, but not limited to, conduct that is negligent, reckless, intentional, with or without malice, or a breach of any duty, law, or rule, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. Plaintiff acknowledges, and the members of the Settlement Class acknowledge, and by operation of this Judgment shall have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement. 21. The Settlement will become effective only when both of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) a judgment containing the foregoing release and binding on Plaintiff and all members of the Settlement Class (other than those who have properly requested exclusion therefrom in the manner described in this Notice) has been entered in the Action, approving the Settlement and dismissing the Action with prejudice; and (b) such judgment, with the exception of any portion thereof awarding attorneys fees and expenses to Plaintiff s counsel, has become final and non-appealable. 22. Plaintiff s counsel will apply to the Court, at or before the Settlement Fairness Hearing, for an award of attorneys fees and expenses in an aggregate amount of not more than $350,000. Defendants have agreed not to oppose an application for attorneys fees and expenses that does not exceed such limit, and to pay such amount as may be awarded by the Court up to such limit. The amount of any such award is solely within the Court s discretion. Payment of any such award is conditioned upon, among other things, the parties obtaining Court approval of the Settlement, dismissal of the Action by the Court with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation, such dismissal becoming final and non-appealable as provided by the Stipulation, and the Closing of the Merger in accordance with the Merger Agreement. However, the effectiveness of the Settlement is not conditioned in any way upon the award of attorneys fees and expenses to Plaintiff s counsel. 23. Defendants are bearing the costs of this Notice as well as all other reasonable costs of providing notice of the Settlement to members of the Settlement Class. 24. If the Settlement does not become final as described in the Stipulation, the Stipulation and the proposed Settlement shall be null and void and of no force and effect, and shall not be deemed to prejudice in any way the position of any of the parties with respect to the Action, who will be returned to their respective legal positions prior to the execution of the Stipulation and the June 28, 2006 Memorandum of Understanding (except that Defendants shall bear the costs associated with printing and disseminating this Notice). The parties have agreed that the Stipulation shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, without regard to New York s rules with respect to conflict of laws. NOTICE OF FAIRNESS HEARING AND RIGHTS OF SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS 25. Any individual or entity falling within the definition of the Settlement Class who so desires may be excluded from the Settlement and the Settlement Class solely for the purpose of pursuing potential claims for monetary damages. Any such person or entity seeking to be so excluded must submit to the Notice Administrator at: KeySpan Merger Litigation Request for Exclusion, c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC, P.O. Box 9014, Jericho, NY a written request for exclusion ( Request for Exclusion ) via regular mail postmarked not later than April 10, A Request for Exclusion shall: (a) state the name, mailing address, address (if any), and telephone number (if any) of the person or entity requesting exclusion; (b) contain a statement attesting to the fact that such person or entity is a member of the Settlement Class, and setting forth the number of KeySpan shares such person or entity held during the Settlement Class Period (or, if such number varied during the Settlement Class 5

6 Period, the largest number of shares held during such Period), the date(s) such shares were acquired and the number of shares acquired on each such date, and the date(s) within the Settlement Class Period that such person or entity sold any KeySpan shares and the number of shares sold on each such date; and (c) state that the person or entity wishes to be excluded from the Settlement Class. All individuals who submit valid and timely Requests for Exclusion in the manner set forth in this paragraph shall not be bound by the Settlement or any judgment that may be entered with respect to potential claims for monetary damages but shall be bound by the Settlement and any judgment that may be entered with respect to all claims for injunctive, declaratory, and other equitable relief. Any member of the Settlement Class who fails to submit a Request for Exclusion in the above-prescribed manner shall be deemed to have waived his, her or its rights to be excluded from the Settlement Class and shall be barred from making such a request in this or any other action or proceeding. Class Counsel shall provide copies of any and all Requests for Exclusion to Defendants counsel at least seven (7) days before the Settlement Fairness Hearing. 26. Any member of the Settlement Class who objects to the proposed Settlement, Plaintiff s counsel s application for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses, or who otherwise wishes to be heard, may appear in person or by attorney at the Settlement Fairness Hearing and present any evidence or argument that may be proper and relevant, provided, however, that no later than April 10, 2007 (except upon leave granted by the Court upon good cause shown) such person shall file with the Clerk of the Court and, on or before such filing, shall serve a notice of such person s intention to appear, by hand or by first class mail, postage prepaid, upon the counsel specified below: WEISS & LURIE SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP Attn: Joseph H. Weiss, Esq. Attn: Paul C. Gluckow, Esq. 551 Fifth Avenue 425 Lexington Avenue New York, NY New York, NY Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for the KeySpan Defendants SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP Attn:Douglas M. Kraus, Esq. Four Times Square New York, NY Attorneys for National Grid plc Such notice shall: (a) contain a statement attesting to the fact that such person or entity is a member of the Settlement Class, and setting forth the number of KeySpan shares such person or entity held during the Settlement Class Period (or, if such number varied during the Settlement Class Period, the largest number of shares held during such Period), the date(s) such shares were acquired and the number of shares acquired on each such date, and the date(s) within the Settlement Class Period that such person or entity sold any KeySpan shares and the number of shares sold on each such date; (b) contain a detailed statement of such person s or entity s specific position with respect to the matters to be considered at the Settlement Fairness Hearing and the grounds therefore; and (c) include copies of any papers such person intends the Court to consider. Any member of the Settlement Class who fails to object in the above-prescribed manner shall be deemed to have waived his, her or its objection and shall be barred from raising such objection in this or any other action or proceeding. 27. Members of the Settlement Class who have no objection to the proposed Settlement do not need to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing or take any other action. If the Settlement is not approved, the case will continue and the Stipulation and the proposed Settlement shall become null and void and of no further force or effect. DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION 28. If the Court approves the proposed Settlement, the parties jointly will move the Court to enter a judgment: a. approving the proposed Settlement as fair, reasonable, adequate and in the best interests of the Settlement Class, and directing consummation of the proposed Settlement, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Stipulation; 6

7 b. dismissing the Action with prejudice on the merits, without costs except as provided in the Stipulation, and releasing the Released Parties from all liabilities for the Released Claims (as such terms are defined in the text of the proposed release quoted in paragraph 20, above); c. permanently barring and enjoining any and all members of the Settlement Class from instituting, commencing, prosecuting, participating in or continuing any action or other proceeding in any court or tribunal of this or any other jurisdiction, either directly, representatively, derivatively or in any other capacity, asserting any claims that arise out of, or in any way relate to, the Released Claims; d. awarding Plaintiff s counsel such fees and expenses as the Court deems appropriate; and e. reserving jurisdiction over all matters related to the consummation of the proposed Settlement. 29. The Court has the right to approve the proposed Settlement with modifications and without further notice to members of the Settlement Class. The Court may also adjourn the Settlement Fairness Hearing or any adjournment thereof without further notice other than to counsel for the parties. 30. By Order of the Court, pending final determination of whether the proposed Settlement should be approved, no shareholder may institute, commence or continue, directly, individually, derivatively, representatively, on behalf of a class or in any other capacity, any action asserting any claim that is a Released Claim. SPECIAL NOTICE TO SECURITIES BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES 31. If you held shares of KeySpan common stock for any other person between November 12, 2004 and October 20, 2006, you are directed promptly to: (a) provide a copy of this Notice to each such other person, postmarked no later than ten (10) business days after receipt of this Notice, or (b) to provide, within ten (10) business days of receipt of this Notice, the names and addresses of such Persons to the Notice Administrator, preferably in an MS Excel data table, setting forth: (i) title/registration, (ii) street address, (iii) city/state/zip; electronically in MS Word or WordPerfect files (label size Avery #5162); or on computer-generated mailing labels, in which case the Notice Administrator will send copies of the Notice to your beneficial owners. In the alternative, you may request sufficient copies of this Notice, free of charge, to mail to your beneficial owners by contacting the Notice Administrator at: KeySpan Merger Litigation, c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC, P.O. Box 9014, Jericho, NY ; Telephone: (800) ; Fax: (516) ; Website: You may also obtain reimbursement of your reasonable and actual out-of-pocket disbursements that would not have been made but for this request by submitting an itemized statement to the Notice Administrator at the above mailing address. SCOPE OF THIS NOTICE 32. The foregoing description of the Action, the Settlement Fairness Hearing, the terms of the proposed Settlement and other matters described herein does not purport to be comprehensive. Shareholders are referred to the Stipulation and documents publicly filed with the Court in the Action, including the pleadings and other papers, which you or your attorney may examine during regular business hours of each business day at the offices of the Clerk, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY FURTHER INFORMATION 33. Any questions you have about the matters in this Notice should not be directed to the Court, but should instead be directed by telephone or in writing to Plaintiff s Counsel, Weiss & Lurie, 551 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10176, Attn: Joseph H. Weiss, Esq., Telephone: If you require additional copies of the Notice, please contact the Notice Administrator, as set forth in paragraph 31, above. Dated: February 6, 2007 By Order of the Honorable Carolyn E. Demarest Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Kings 7

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE BOISE INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8933-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, Plaintiffs, v. DOUGLAS W. BROYLES, MARVIN D. BURKETT, STEPHEN L. DOMENIK, DR. NORMAN GODINHO, RONALD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ROBERT WINN, JAMES WINN and MARVIN GILL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. IP00-0310

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY x JOANN KRAJEWSKI, PAUL Consolidated Case No. 02-CV-221038 MCHENDRY, and MICHAEL LAMB, Division No. 8 Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JOHN NICHOLAS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2013 CH 11752 Consolidated

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION CV 2001-5852 (ARR) (MDG) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS WHO

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D

Case 2:11-cv CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT D Case 211-cv-03535-CMR Document 25-6 Filed 02/06/12 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Pahlavan v. British Airways PLC et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 Joseph W. Cotchett (; jcotchett@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY San Francisco Airport Office Center 0 Malcolm Road, Suite 0 Burlingame, CA

More information

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 23, 2016 PLC Polycom, Inc Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 *P-PLC-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-5781 1-855-907-3170 wwwgardencitygroupcom/cases-info/polycomsettlement

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I

~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I Case 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM Document 1457 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I u:nu ATl\'J!~O'd.L)J 'l J 1 J~'.ll'JO:XXl : " \ (J

More information

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER.

IF YOU HELD SHARES OF CH ENERGY FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, PLEASE PROMPTLY TRANSMIT THIS DOCUMENT TO THE BENEFICIAL OWNER. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE CH ENERGY GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES Index No. 775000/2012 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Settlement Hearing and Right to Appear If You Were a Stockholder of Windstream Holdings, Inc. to whom its April 26, 2015 One-for-Six Reverse Stock Split Shares

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and Lead Case No. C-1-00-320 All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with No.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE Case No. 30-2009-00236910 CLASS ACTION Assigned

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL

THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) Consolidated C.A. No VCL THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE REHABCARE GROUP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION Consolidated C.A. No. 6197 - VCL NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION,

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Autoliv Securities Litigation Website: www.autolivsecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@autolivsecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 4259 Toll Free: 1-877-880-0181 Portland, OR 97208-4259

More information

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant.

Case 1:16-cv KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11. : Plaintiff, : : Defendant. Case 116-cv-02487-KPF Document 26 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x SHIVA STEIN, Plaintiff, - against

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 14, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS VACATION FUND, et al., v. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP, PLC, et al.

More information

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH Must be Postmarked No Later Than November 22, 2018 Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10634 Dublin, OH 43017-9234 www.nathanvmattashareholderslitigation.com SRM *P-SRM-POC/1*

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JERRY MICHAEL CRAFTON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. SACV-07-0065-PSG (MLGx) CLASS ACTION

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must be Postmarked (if Mailed) or Received (if Submitted Online) No Later Than June 29, 2018 PO Box 10552 1-866-281-1098 info@plygemsecuritiessettlementcom wwwplygemsecuritiessettlementcom PGH *P-PGH-POC/1*

More information

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code Rentrak Corporation Shareholders Litigation Website: www.rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com PO Box 4234 Phone: (888)

More information

BERGEN COUNTY. Docket No. BER-L EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE

BERGEN COUNTY. Docket No. BER-L EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE In Re: Pascack Bancorp Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION BERGEN COUNTY Docket No. BER-L-7277-15 EXHIBIT C PROPOSED NOTICE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE X THE EDITH ZIMMERMAN ESTATE, By And : Through STANLEY E. ZIMMERMAN, JR., : A Personal Representative Of The Estate; : THE ESTATE OF GEORGE E. BATCHELOR,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BRAD WIND, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-2380CI-20 CATALINA

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA J. WRIGHT WILLIAMSON and THEOPHILUS ) HERBST, JR., Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal ) Defendant THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., ) ) Case No. CJ 2002-1144

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of Himself and All ) Case No. 98-009023-AI Others Similarly

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Enzymotec Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: 844-418-6627 Claims Administrator Website: www.enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4079 Email: info@enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Final Approval Hearing

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION. Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CENTRAL DIVISION Coordination Proceeding JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) PROCEEDING NO. 4256 VERISIGN CASES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively on Behalf of THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., v. Plaintiff, JOSE B. ALVAREZ, ALAN M. BENNETT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BLUE RHINO CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. ) Master File No. ) CV-03-3495-MRP(AJWx)

More information

In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X

In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X In The Circuit Court of The Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, In and For Hillsborough County, Florida MATILDA FRANZITTA, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AEROSONIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff vs. DAVID

More information

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website:

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website: SAP Must be Postmarked No Later Than Arena Securities Litigation April 13, 2018 c/o GCG *P-SAP-POC/1* PO Box 10526 Dublin, OH 43017-0526 Toll-Free: (877) 981-9683 Settlement Website: wwwarenapharmaceuticalsclassactionsettlementcom

More information

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE

IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE IN THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TENNESSEE In re PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master Docket

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Deadline for Submission: September 15, 2017 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CAESARSTONE, LTD. COMMON STOCK ( CAESARSTONE ) DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2014

More information

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1*

GLS Dublin OH *P-GLS$F-POC/1* Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 26, 2010 Ladmen Partners v Globalstar Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc PO Box 9349 GLS Dublin OH 43017-4249 1-866-396-5584 *P-GLSF-POC/1* Claim Number: Control

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In the United States District Court For the Western District of Oklahoma NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others

More information

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281

Case 2:14-cv JAK-SS Document 86 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 56 Page ID #:1281 Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-00-jak-ss Document

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 06-cv-377-JL FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE L',. DISTRICT COURT 1IS IR!CT OF fth If 1 1 JUL 20 /i\ Q: 20 JAMES SLOMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

More information

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 4, 2017 In re Energy Recovery, Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10358 Dublin, OH 43017-0358 (844) 634-8908 Fax: (855) 409-7129 Questions@EnergyRecoverySecuritiesLitigationcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, - against - U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements), Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13 Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 13 1 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP MARY K. BLASY (211262) 2 WALTER W. NOSS (pro hac

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA In re STRATOSPHERE CORPORATION SECURITIES ) Master File No. LITIGATION ) CV-S-96-00708-PMP-(RLH) ) This Document Relates To: ) CLASS ACTION ) ALL ACTIONS.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 26, 2018 Vista Outdoor Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10603 Dublin, OH 43017-9203 1-888-558-9299 info@vistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom wwwvistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 431-3 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No CB Hon. James M. In re ITC HOLDINGS CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND BUSINESS COURT Lead Case No. 2016-151852-CB Hon. James M. Alexander This Document

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION THE PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE FUNDS, On Behalf of Itself and Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

More information

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JOSEPH WHITE, Plaintiff, Case No. 00-C-1388 v. Hon. Joseph P. Stadtmueller (Judge) HEARTLAND HIGH-YIELD MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, et al., Defendants.

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43

Case3:11-cv EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page1 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page2 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70 Filed03/06/14 Page3 of 43 Case3:11-cv-03176-EMC Document70

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS and ROBERT LIFSON, Plaintiffs, v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC. and LAURIE BEBO, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION JAMES SULLIVAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION v. Plaintiff, TAYLOR CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDRA BALABAN, On Behalf of Civil Action No. 02-4852 Herself And All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Hon. Joel A. Pisano HENRY B. SCHACHT,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE THOMAS D. KEELEY and LINDA TALLEY HEWITT, On ) Master Case File No. 737787 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) (Consolidated

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Bernice Polage, et al., v. Christopher H. Cole, et al. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 24-C-13-006665 * * * * * * * * * * * AMENDED STIPULATION AND

More information

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1

01-CA4180. X0791 v.05 1 In re ProNAi Shareholder Litigation Settlement Claims Administrator c/o Epiq P.O. Box 5053 Portland, OR 97208-5053 Toll Free Number: (877) 734-5338 Settlement Website: www.pronaishareholderlitigation.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No. 1:16-cv-00102 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Case 2:13-cv RSM Document 90-1 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-0-rsm Document 0- Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Atossa Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation Civil Action No. -cv-0-rsm 0 STIPULATION AND

More information

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND SETTLEMENT HEARING ZLATOMIR VERGIEV, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, CARLOS E. AGUERO, MICHAEL J. DRURY, CARY M. GROSSMAN, SEAN P. DUFFY, PAUL A. GARRETT, BRET R. MAXWELL, TOTAL

More information

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:15-cv-07350-PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc Securities Litigation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION In re DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION Master Docket No. 4:03-CV-212 This Document Relates To: CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS. TO: NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY KENTON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION I CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 07-CI-00627

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF PATRICK LENTSCH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-00012-DAK-EJF VISTA OUTDOOR INC., MARK W. DEYOUNG,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) CONSOLIDATED C.A. No VCG IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE TRUE RELIGION APPAREL, INC SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 8598-VCG NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION IN RE NEUSTAR, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 14-CV-00885 JCC TRJ NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

Case 1:12-cv TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 807 EXHIBIT C

Case 1:12-cv TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 807 EXHIBIT C Case 1:12-cv-01016-TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 807 EXHIBIT C Case 1:12-cv-01016-TWP-DKL Document 55-4 Filed 10/18/12 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 808 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538 Must be Postmarked No Later Than July 6, 2018 REA Esposito v American Renal Assocs Holdings, Inc et al Claims Administrator c/o GCG PO Box 10538 *P-REA-POC/1* Dublin, Ohio 43017-4538 (888) 684-5083 wwwarasecuritiessettlementcom

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Case 2:05cv00204DB Document 1053 Red 11/07/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Exhibit B IN RE imergent SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No.: 2:05-cv-0204

More information