Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 1

Transcription

1 Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 1 Dear Judge Anna, Thank you for your comments on this matter. And permit me to: 1. State for the record these victims of human rights violations and persecution by impostors pretending to be legitimate public officers should have never been kidnapped in the first place. 2. Object to some of your assertions 3. Amplify a bit on your contentions to explain from where I am coming.. I speak from a position of total ignorance to the laws which you seem to regard as legitimate. Rules of procedure whether criminal or civil are just rules not laws. Besides since these rules, are imposed with no full disclosure and without being granted consent by the people the governed! Legal System NULL AND VOID! Rules NOT Laws *** PUBLIC NOTICE: Judge Rules Administrative Court System Illegal Like everything else we are asked to believe about the legitimacy of these fraudulent courts and fake court officers and public officers they are all acting in fraud. Their actions are null and void! And further, since they have acted outside of their jurisdiction of the sea, if such a jurisdiction even legitimately exists they have committed acts of piracy. This is the same behavior we witnessed in the Thomas Deegan abuse of human rights. As you so state... They may be foreign and I respectfully submit that you recognize it and I also recognize it But the criminal issue here is that they too recognize it and proceed to violate the laws anyway with deliberate premeditated intent to: 1. Do harm to the American people and 2. conspire with other criminal impostors to commit piracy. They openly misrepresent themselves Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!

2 Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 2 They are criminals. Plain and simple. And no one Including you can apologize and make excuses for their criminal acts against the American people. And any legitimate and lawfully empowered public officer must take the appropriate steps to protect the American people. That is their primary job. If those who pretend to be legitimate public offers, fail to protect the American public, by their own actions they commit treason against the American people. There are NO acceptable excuses or double speak that justifies these open acts of treason. The entire group of criminal impostors who unlawfully committed acts of inland piracy have committed crimes against the people. They are subject to investigation, arrest and where called for prosecution. You are more than welcome to offer any corrections you feel you can lawfully defednd. arnie arnie@arnierosner.com /7 scannedretina.com On Aug 23, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com> wrote: People have asked me to comment on the Bundy-related trial in Nevada and the jury's refusal to convict. If everyone properly understood jurisdiction and their own country's history, they would know that the ongoing trial is in itself invalid and farce-like and that "US citizens" have no right to address these men or apply their "state of state" statutes to them in the first place.

3 Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 3 When this all began the Bundys, if properly prepared, could have turned to the would-be Prosecutors and asked half a dozen questions, then walked away---- leaving their detractors and accusers to bite their own tongues. Or, as I observed to one who accosted me, "You know, you shouldn't even be talking to me. I haven't given you permission." They are foreign to us. Hello? Repeat --- they are FOREIGN to us. Even though they speak the same language and may have been born in Little Rock, Arkansas, they are in a different foreign jurisdiction. They don't play by the same rules or follow the same law. So the next question is, why are we being accosted by them? Because we are so dumbed down and ignorant that we don't even know who we are, don't know our political status, don't know enough to claim our birthright, don't bother to copyright our own names---so, of course, we also don't know that we belong to a different jurisdiction, are owed different courts, different juries, and different forms of law, either. Bah, and humbug... anyway, since we don't know our own butts from a hole in the ground, we get stuck being hauled into their courts and tried by juries who don't know anything more, different, or better than we do---- which in this case may account for why these cases were acquitted. The juries are just as indoctrinated and ignorant as we are, so they continue to believe that US Citizens have constitutional guarantees and that rules of fair-play and justice apply in the courts and that common sense should rule the day. For example, if this man didn't hurt anybody or destroy any property--- where's the crime he committed? If he came to the aid of his neighbor against armed thugs who had no right to enter private property--- where is the crime?

4 Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 4 You see, the jury members still think they are living in America, so they continue to act on the same assumptions as the people in the defendant's chair---much to the consternation of federal prosecutors everywhere. This appears to be a case of jury nullification, where the jurors tried the statutory law and found it wanting, instead of the defendants. What else could it be, considering that the victims were not allowed to make any kind of defense and were railroaded throughout on the false presumption of 14th Amendment "citizenship"? The facts in their favor, the misbehavior and bullying and threats of the federal agents, the wrong-headed presumptions of ownership interest by the federal corporations, the mismanagement of public lands in the western states by the BLM, the conspiracy of "county of county" sheriffs and federal agencies, all that and more wasn't allowed to be heard in the Defendant's favor. So what is left? The Jurors looked at the charges and realized they were Bushwah. They realized that these were honest farmers and ranchers who hadn't done anything wrong according to American Law. So they tossed out the suppositions and demands of the foreign statutory law on its ear. Bully for them! They might have done it in total ignorance, but hey, they did it. So it doesn't matter if they were serving as jurors in a foreign court and under the false presumption that they were all US citizens. They did the right thing. They upheld the standards of American justice. And that is what counts. If every juror and every jury in America did the same, it would not take very long at all for a quiet revolution to take place, as those jurors would one-by-one reject and require the replacement of the statutory laws in the same way that our land jurisdiction jurors can nullify any legislated law.

5 Acts of Piracy demand the death penalty Page - 5 The jury is the law in America, and as long as we have jurors who have a clear sense of logic and justice and who can reason and weigh facts, the jury however miscast and misdirected and misrepresented, remains our safeguard against tyranny and madness imposed by legislative acts. And judges like Gloria Navarro.