NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION CV (ARR) (MDG) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED THE COMMON STOCK OF KEYSPAN COR- PORATION ( KEYSPAN ) DURING THE PERIOD MARCH 24, 2000 THROUGH JULY 17, 2001, INCLUSIVE (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS, THE SETTLEMENT CLASS PERIOD ). PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO A PRO- POSED SETTLEMENT OF THIS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT. IF YOU ARE A SET- TLEMENT CLASS MEMBER, THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFOR- MATION AS TO YOUR RIGHTS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS AND DO NOT SUBMIT A TIMELY REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION, YOU WILL BE BOUND BY THE RELEASE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER YOU SUBMIT A CLAIM. CLAIMS DEADLINE: CLAIMANTS MUST SUBMIT PROOFS OF CLAIM, ON THE FORM ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTICE, POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, EXCLUSION DEADLINE: REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION MUST BE SENT TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR, POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 10, BANKS, BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES: PLEASE SEE THE INSTRUCTIONS IN IX BELOW. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the Court ), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, that the parties have reached a cash settlement in the amount of thirteen million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($13,750,000) (the Settlement Fund ) in the above-captioned action (the Litigation ) subject to Court approval. Your recovery from this fund will depend on a number of variables, including, but not limited to, the number of shares of KeySpan common stock you purchased during the Settlement Class Period, and the timing of your purchases and sales. Lead Plaintiffs Counsel, in consultation with their experts, estimate that, if all members of the Settlement Class timely file valid claims, the average recovery per share will be approximately $0.33 before deduction of Court-approved fees and expenses and the costs of settlement notice and administration. Depending upon the number of claims filed and the other factors listed in the Plan of Allocation ( VI, E, below), a Settlement Class Member will receive more or less than this estimated average amount. Defendants emphatically deny any and all claims of wrongdoing, and any and all liability alleged in connection with the Litigation. Further, Representative Plaintiffs and the Defendants do not agree on the amount recoverable per share if the Representative Plaintiffs prevailed in the Litigation. The issues on which the parties disagree include, among others: (1) the appropriate economic model for determining the amount (if any) by which KeySpan common stock was allegedly artificially inflated during the Settlement Class Period; (2) the amount (if any) by which KeySpan common stock was allegedly artificially inflated during the Settlement Class Period; (3) the effect of various market forces influencing the trading prices of KeySpan common stock at various times during the Settlement Class Period; (4) the extent to which external factors, such as general

2 market and industry conditions, influenced the trading prices of KeySpan common stock at various times during the Settlement Class Period; (5) the extent to which the various matters that Representative Plaintiffs allege were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading prices of KeySpan common stock at various times during the Settlement Class Period; (6) the extent to which the various allegedly adverse facts that Representative Plaintiffs alleged were omitted influenced (if at all) the trading prices of KeySpan common stock at various times during the Settlement Class Period; and (7) whether the statements allegedly made or facts allegedly omitted were material, false, misleading, or otherwise actionable under the securities laws. Representative Plaintiffs believe that the proposed settlement is the best that could be obtained and is in the best interests of the Settlement Class. There are significant risks associated with continuing to litigate and proceeding to trial. In addition, there is a danger that the Settlement Class would not prevail on their claims against the Defendants even if those claims went to trial, in which case the Class would receive nothing. Further, had the case proceeded to trial and assuming the Representative Plaintiffs established liability of the Defendants, the amount of damages recoverable by Settlement Class Members would have been subject to rigorous attack by the Defendants. Recoverable damages are limited to losses actually caused by conduct found actionable under applicable securities laws. Had the Litigation gone to trial, Defendants would have tried to prove that all or most of the losses of Settlement Class Members were caused by non-actionable market, industry, or other general economic factors. The proposed settlement eliminates these risks and provides an immediate recovery for Settlement Class Members. Representative Plaintiffs Counsel have not received any payment for their services in prosecuting this Litigation on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and the Members of the Settlement Class. If the Court approves the settlement, counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs will apply to the Court for attorneys fees constituting no more than one-third (1/3) of the Settlement Fund. Representative Plaintiffs Counsel also plan to seek reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses and costs incurred in connection with this Litigation in an amount not to exceed $650,000.00, or $0.015 per share, and to request that the costs of settlement notice and administration in the amount of up to $200,000.00, or $0.005 per share, be paid out of the Settlement Fund. This Notice is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an expression of any opinion by the Court with respect to the truth of the allegations in the Litigation or the merits of the claims or defenses asserted. Defendants have expressly denied any and all wrongdoing and/or liability. This Notice is to advise you of the proposed settlement and of your rights in connection therewith. If you have any questions about the settlement, you may contact the following Lead Plaintiffs Counsel: CAULEY BOWMAN CARNEY WEISS & LURIE & WILLIAMS, PLLC -and- JOSEPH H. WEISS S. GENE CAULEY MARK D. SMILOW J. ALLEN CARNEY 551 Fifth Avenue Executive Center Drive, Suite 200 Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR New York, NY I. DEFINITIONS As used in the Stipulation, the following terms have the meanings specified below: A. KeySpan means KeySpan Corporation, a New York corporation, with its principal executive offices located at One MetroTech Center, Brooklyn, New York. B. Defendants means KeySpan and the Individual Defendants (defined below). C. Individual Defendants means Robert Catell, Craig Matthews, Gerald Luterman, and William Feraudo. D. Lead Plaintiffs means Donald Kassan and Peter Hubbard. 2

3 E. Lead Plaintiffs Counsel means the law firms of Cauley Bowman Carney & Williams, PLLC, Executive Center Drive, Suite 200, Little Rock, AR 72211, and Weiss & Lurie, 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1600, New York, NY F. Person means an individual, corporation, limited liability corporation, professional corporation, limited liability partnership, partnership, limited partnership, association, joint stock company, estate, legal representative, trust, unincorporated association, government or any political subdivision or agency thereof, and any business or legal entity and their spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, representatives, or assignees. G. Representative Plaintiffs means, collectively, the Persons or entities appointed as Lead Plaintiffs and the Persons or entities designated as Class Representatives in this Litigation. H. Representative Plaintiffs Counsel means counsel who have appeared for any of the Representative Plaintiffs in the Litigation. I. Settlement Class means all Persons who purchased KeySpan common stock between March 24, 2000 and July 17, 2001, inclusive. Excluded from the Settlement Class are KeySpan, the Individual Defendants and members of their immediate families, the members of the Kay family that formerly served as senior officers of Roy Kay, Inc., any entities in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest, any entities that are a parent or subsidiary of or are controlled by KeySpan, and any affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors, or assigns of any of the Defendants. Those Persons who timely and validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action to be sent to potential Settlement Class Members are also excluded from the Settlement Class. J. Settlement Class Member or Member of the Settlement Class means a Person who falls within the definition of the Settlement Class. II. THE LITIGATION AND RELATED PROCEEDINGS A. On and after August 28, 2001, the following actions were filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the Court ) as proposed class actions on behalf of Persons who purchased the common stock of KeySpan at various times during the Settlement Class Period: 1. Stephen Dinallo v. KeySpan Corp., et al., 01-CV-5852 (ARR) (MDG); 2. Adele Brody v. KeySpan Corp., et al., 01-CV-5887 (CBA) (MDG); 3. Arnold Bement v. KeySpan Corp., et al., 01-CV-7025 (CBA) (MDG); and 4. Matthew Fay v. KeySpan Corp., et al., 01-CV-7294 (JG) (RML). B. On November 29, 2001, the Court entered an Order consolidating the four foregoing actions into the first filed case. C. On March 27, 2002, the Court appointed Donald Kassan and Peter Hubbard as Lead Plaintiffs for the Litigation. By the same Order, the Court approved the selection of Lead Plaintiffs Counsel: Cauley Bowman Carney & Williams, PLLC and Weiss & Lurie. D. On May 13, 2002, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the Consolidated Complaint ). E. Defendants moved to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint on February 7, On March 21, 2003 the motion was granted and the Consolidated Complaint was dismissed with leave to replead certain claims. F. On April 7, 2003, Lead Counsel filed an Amended Class Action Complaint ( Amended Complaint ). In the Amended Complaint, the Lead Plaintiffs alleged that, during the Settlement Class Period, Defendants issued false and misleading statements in violation of Sections 10(b), 20(a) and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 1934 Act ), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. 3

4 G. On May 27, 2003, Defendants moved to dismiss the Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, to strike certain allegations. The briefing of the motion was completed on June 17, H. On July 30, 2003 the Motion to Dismiss was denied and the motion in the alternative to strike was granted in part and denied in part by the Court. I. On August 19, 2003, Defendants moved for reconsideration, and the briefing of this motion was completed on September 10, On November 20, 2003, the Court granted this motion, striking all alleged false statements made prior to January 25, J. On November 7, 2003, a status conference was held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go, and a Scheduling Order was entered. K. On November 18, 2003, the parties filed a joint report under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) setting forth a proposed case management plan agreed to by the parties listing the deadlines for Defendants response to the Amended Complaint, discovery, and for various motions. L. On December 1, 2003, Lead Counsel filed a Motion for Class Certification. Document and deposition discovery of the proposed class representatives ensued. Thereafter, Defendants stipulated to Howard Frank as the sole class representative, and on March 12, 2004, the Court So Ordered the stipulation and certified a class of all purchasers of KeySpan stock between January 25, 2001 and July 17, The Stipulation was made without prejudice to: (1) the right of any party to bring an appropriate motion at a later time, without leave of Court, to de-certify, limit, extend, or otherwise modify or redefine the class period, the class, or its division into subclasses or to challenge, substitute or modify its representatives, and/or (2) the right of the Court to alter or amend this class certification order at any time prior to the entry of a final judgment on the merits, or to make such other orders as may be appropriate. M. On December 2, 2003, Defendants answered the Amended Complaint. N. In early 2004, Lead Counsel and counsel for the Defendants entered into earnest settlement negotiations. The negotiations were facilitated by the aid and advice of a neutral mediator and proceeded simultaneously with the parties formal discovery of the facts underlying the Litigation. Both sides proceeded over the course of many meetings held in person and via telephone to craft a settlement. O. As a result of these negotiations, counsel for the Defendants and Lead Counsel have agreed to a settlement of the Action. Based on the terms and conditions of the Stipulation summarized herein, and subject to the approval of the Court, Defendants have agreed to pay $13,750,000 in full settlement of any and all claims which were or could have been asserted in the Action. III. DEFENDANTS DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY Defendants have expressly and emphatically denied and continue to deny each and all of the claims and contentions alleged by the Lead Plaintiffs. Defendants expressly have denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged, or that could have been alleged, in the Litigation. Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class (as defined above) have suffered damages or that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class were harmed by the alleged conduct. Neither the Stipulation nor the Settlement shall be construed, whether in whole or in part, as evidence, or an admission or concession on the part of Defendants, of any fault or liability, nor shall the Stipulation, the Settlement or the Supplemental Agreement be considered an admission by Defendants that Lead Plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements for class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In the event that the Settlement is terminated for any reason, any and all defenses shall remain available to Defendant (including any objections to class certification). Without conceding any infirmity in any defenses they have asserted or intend to assert in the Litigation, Defendants consider it desirable and in their best interest that this Litigation be dismissed on the terms set forth herein in order to avoid further expense and protracted litigation. 4

5 IV. CLAIMS OF THE LEAD PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT The Lead Plaintiffs and their Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit. However, Lead Plaintiffs and their Counsel recognize and acknowledge Defendants denial of wrongdoing and liability, as well as the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation through trial and through appeals. Lead Plaintiffs Counsel also have taken into account the uncertain outcome and risk of any litigation, especially in complex actions such as the Litigation, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Lead Plaintiffs Counsel considered the inherent problems of proving, and possible defenses to, the allegations asserted in the Litigation. Based on their evaluation, Lead Plaintiffs Counsel believe that the settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Settlement Class and protects the best interests of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. V. THE RIGHTS OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may receive the benefit of and you will be bound by the terms of the proposed Settlement described in Section VI of this Notice, upon the Court s approval of such terms. If you are a Settlement Class Member, you have the following options: A. You may file a Proof of Claim as described below. If you choose this option, you will remain a Settlement Class Member, you will share in the proceeds of the proposed settlement if your claim is timely and valid and if the proposed settlement is finally approved by the Court, and you will be bound by the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal described below. B. If you do not wish to be included in the Settlement Class and you do not wish to participate in the proposed settlement described in this Notice, you may request to be excluded. To do so, you must so state in writing postmarked no later than February 10, You must set forth: 1. the name of this Litigation (In re KeySpan Corporation Securities Litigation, CV (ARR) (MDG)); 2. your name, address, and telephone number, and the name and address of the record owner of KeySpan common stock if different from your own; 3. the number of shares of KeySpan common stock you purchased and the number of shares of common stock you sold during the Settlement Class Period, and the dates and prices of any purchase(s) and/or sale(s); and 4. that you wish to be excluded from the Settlement Class. You must address the exclusion request as follows: KeySpan Corporation Securities Litigation c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY NO REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION WILL BE CONSIDERED VALID UNLESS ALL OF THE INFORMATION DESCRIBED ABOVE IS INCLUDED IN ANY SUCH REQUEST. C. If you validly request exclusion from the Settlement Class: (1) you will be excluded from the Settlement Class; (2) you will not share in the proceeds of the settlement described herein; (3) you will not be bound by any judgment entered in the Litigation; and (4) you will not be precluded, by reason of your decision to request exclusion from the Settlement Class, from otherwise prosecuting an individual claim, if timely, against Defendants based on the matters complained of in the Litigation. 5

6 D. If you do not request in writing to be excluded from the Settlement Class as set forth in Paragraph B above, you will be bound by any and all determinations or judgments in the Litigation in connection with the settlement entered into or approved by the Court, whether favorable or unfavorable to the Settlement Class, including, without limitation, the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal described in Section VIII, Paragraph A, below, and you shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal shall have, fully released all of the Released Claims (defined below) against the Released Parties, regardless of whether you submit a valid Proof of Claim. E. If you do not request exclusion from the Settlement Class, you may object to the settlement and/or the application of Representative Plaintiffs Counsel for an award of attorneys fees and reimbursement of expenses in the manner set forth in Section XI, below. The filing of a Proof of Claim by a Settlement Class Member does not preclude a Settlement Class Member from objecting to the settlement. However, if your objection is rejected, you will be bound by the settlement and the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal (described in Section VIII, Paragraph A, below) just as if you had not objected. F. You may do nothing at all. If you choose this option, you will not share in the proceeds of the settlement, but you will be bound by any judgment entered by the Court, and you shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal shall have, fully released all of the Released Claims (defined below) against the Released Parties. G. If you are a Settlement Class Member, you may, but are not required to, enter an appearance through counsel of your own choosing at your own expense. If you do not do so, you will be represented by Lead Plaintiffs Counsel: CAULEY BOWMAN CARNEY WEISS & LURIE & WILLIAMS, PLLC -and- JOSEPH H. WEISS S. GENE CAULEY MARK D. SMILOW J. ALLEN CARNEY 551 Fifth Avenue Executive Center Drive, Suite 200 Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR New York, NY VI. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT The Settling Parties have reached a settlement in the Litigation, embodied in a Stipulation of Settlement dated as of September 21, 2004 (the Stipulation ). Lead Plaintiffs Counsel, on the basis of, among other things, a thorough investigation of the facts and the law relating to the acts, events, and conduct complained of and the subject matter of the Litigation, have concluded that the proposed settlement is fair to and in the best interests of the Settlement Class. The following description of the proposed settlement of the Litigation is only a summary, and reference is made to the text of the Stipulation, on file with the Court, for a full statement of its provisions: A. The settlement fund consists of $13,750,000 in cash, plus any interest that may accrue thereon ( Settlement Fund ). B. Upon Court approval of the Stipulation and entry of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal, and upon satisfaction of the other conditions to the settlement, described below, the Settlement Fund will be distributed as follows: 1. to pay costs and expenses in connection with providing notice to the members of the class and administering the settlement on behalf of the Settlement Class (up to $200,000); 2. to pay Representative Plaintiffs Counsel attorneys fees, expenses, and costs, with interest thereon (the Fee and Expense Award ), if and to the extent allowed by the Court; and 3. to pay the reasonable costs incurred in the preparation of any tax returns required to be filed on behalf of the Settlement Fund, as well as the taxes (and any interest and penalties determined to be due 6

7 thereon) owed by reason of the earnings of the Settlement Fund, including all Taxes and Tax Expenses as defined in the Stipulation. C. Subject to Court approval of the Plan of Allocation described below, the balance of the Settlement Fund (the Net Settlement Fund ) shall be distributed to Settlement Class Members who submit valid, timely, Proof of Claim forms ( Authorized Claimants ), as follows: 1. Each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall submit a separate Proof of Claim and Release signed under penalty of perjury and supported by such documents as specified in the Proof of Claim as are reasonably available to the Authorized Claimant. 2. All Proof of Claim forms must be postmarked or received by March 1, Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a Proof of Claim within such period, or such other period the Court may order, shall be forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to the Stipulation, but will in all other respects be subject to the provisions of the Stipulation and the final judgment entered by the Court. D. To the extent sufficient funds exist in the Net Settlement Fund, each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to the Authorized Claimant s claim, as defined below. If, however, the amount in the Net Settlement Fund is not sufficient to permit payment of the total claim of each Authorized Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid that percentage of the Net Settlement Fund that each Authorized Claimant s claim is of the total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. A claim will be computed pursuant to the Plan of Allocation ( Plan of Allocation ) as follows: E. Plan of Allocation. 1. The Gross Settlement Fund, less all taxes, approved costs, fees and expenses (the Net Settlement Fund ) will be distributed to the Settlement Class Members who submit acceptable Proofs of Claim ( Authorized Claimants ). 2. The Claims Administrator will determine each Authorized Claimant s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim. 3. Recognized Claims will be calculated as follows: a. For shares purchased during the period from March 24, 2000, through December 10, 2000, and: i. sold on or before July 16, 2001, the Recognized Claim shall be zero; ii. sold from July 17, 2001 through October 14, 2001, the Recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 2.0% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and the Average Closing Price corresponding to the date of sale, as indicated in the table below; iii. retained through October 14, 2001, the recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 2.0% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and $ b. For shares purchased during the period from December 11, 2000 through January 24, 2001, and: i. sold on or before July 16, 2001, the Recognized Claim shall be zero; ii. sold from July 17, 2001 through October 14, 2001, the Recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 3.0% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and the Average Closing Price corresponding to the date of sale, as indicated in the table below; iii. retained through October 14, 2001, the Recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 3.0% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and $

8 c. For shares purchased during the period from January 25, 2001 through July 17, 2001, and: i. sold on or before July 16, 2001, the Recognized Claim shall be zero; ii. sold from July 17, 2001 through October 14, 2001, the Recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 5.1% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and the Average Closing Price corresponding to the date of sale, as indicated in the table below; iii. retained through October 14, 2001, the Recognized Claim per share shall be the lesser of (a) 5.1% of the purchase price, or (b) the difference between the purchase price and $ Average Closing Price per Share: 7/17/ /18/ /19/ /20/ /23/ /24/ /26/ /27/ /30/ /31/ /1/ /2/ /3/ /6/ /7/ /8/ /9/ /10/ /13/ /14/ /15/ /16/ /17/ /20/ /21/ /22/ /23/ /24/ /27/ /28/ /29/ /30/ /31/ /4/ /5/ /6/ /7/ /10/ /17/ /18/ /19/ /20/ /21/ /24/ /25/ /26/ /27/ /28/ /1/ /2/ /3/ /4/ /5/ /8/ /9/ /10/ /11/ /12/ F. General Provisions: 1. The date of purchase or sale is the contract or trade date as distinguished from the settlement date. 2. The date of covering a short sale is deemed to be the purchase date. The date of a short sale is deemed to be the sale date. Shares originally sold short prior to the Settlement Class Period will result in a zero Recognized Claim. 3. The price per share, paid or received, shall be exclusive of all commissions, taxes, fees and other charges. 8

9 4. In processing claims, the first-in, first-out ( FIFO ) basis will be applied to both purchases and sales. 5. Where common stock was purchased or sold by reason of having exercised an option, the option premium should be incorporated into the price accordingly. 6. All profits will be subtracted from all losses to determine the net Recognized Claim of each Authorized Claimant. 7. No payment will be made on any claim where the potential distribution amount is $10.00 or less, but the Authorized Claimant will otherwise be bound by the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal entered by the Court. 8. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over implementation of the settlement and disposition of the Settlement Fund. The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the claim of any Settlement Class Member on equitable grounds. G. Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation set forth above shall be conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No Person shall have any claim against Representative Plaintiffs Counsel, any claims administrator, Defendants, or other agent designated by Lead Plaintiffs Counsel or Defendants or Defendants counsel or Defendants insurers, based on distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further Court orders. All Settlement Class Members who fail to complete and file a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund (unless otherwise ordered by the Court), but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation, including the terms of any Judgment entered and the releases given. H. To share in the Settlement Fund, you must submit a valid Proof of Claim and Release on the form enclosed with this Notice postmarked or received no later than March 1, 2005, to the Claims Administrator at the address set forth on the attached Proof of Claim form. You will bear all risks of delay or non-delivery of your claim. I. The Settlement Fund, less any deductions for fees and costs allowed by the Court and taxes due, shall be maintained by the Escrow Agent for the benefit of the Settlement Class, as provided in the Stipulation. VII. CONDITIONS FOR SETTLEMENT The settlement is conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events described in the Stipulation. Those events include, among other things: (1) entry of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal by the Court, as provided for in the Stipulation; and (2) expiration of the time to appeal from or alter or amend the Judgment. If, for any reason, any one of the conditions described in the Stipulation is not met, the Stipulation might be terminated and, if terminated, will become null and void, and the parties to the Stipulation will be restored to their respective positions in the Litigation. VIII. DISMISSAL AND RELEASES A. If the Court approves the proposed settlement, the Court will enter the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal that will dismiss the Litigation against Defendants with prejudice, and bar and permanently enjoin the Representative Plaintiffs, the Lead Plaintiffs, and each Settlement Class Member, regardless of whether such Settlement Class Member has submitted a Proof of Claim, from prosecuting the Released Claims (defined below) against the Released Parties. At such time, any such Settlement Class Member shall be conclusively deemed to have released any and all such Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against the Released Parties. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over implementation of the settlement, disposition of the Settlement Fund, hearing and determining Representative Plaintiffs Counsel s application for attorneys fees, costs, interest, and expenses (including expert fees and the costs of the notice and administration of the Settlement Fund), and enforcing and administering the Stipulation, including any releases executed in connection therewith. 9

10 B. As used above, Released Claims means and includes any and all claims or causes of action, including Unknown Claims (as defined below), debts, suits, rights of action, dues, sums of money, accounts, bonds, bills, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, judgments, variances, executions, obligations, demands, rights, liabilities, damages, losses, fees, and costs of any kind, nature and/or description whatsoever, matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidated, accrued or unaccrued, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, whether or not asserted, threatened, alleged or litigated, at law, equity or otherwise, including, without limitation, claims for contribution or indemnification, or for costs, expenses (including, without limitation, amounts paid in settlement) and attorneys fees, claims for negligence, gross negligence, breach of duty of care and/or breach of duty of loyalty, misrepresentation, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or violations of any federal, state or local statutes, common law, rules or regulations, that now exist or heretofore existed, that have been or could have been asserted in the Action or any other forum against the Released Parties, whether directly, indirectly, representatively, derivatively or in any other capacity, which arise out of, are based upon or relate to, or are in connection with: (1) the claims asserted in the Action; (2) the purchase or sale or other acquisition or disposition or holding of KeySpan securities during the Settlement Class Period; (3) any of the facts, circumstances, claims, transactions, events, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, representations, omissions, or failures to act, or matters of any kind or nature whatsoever, related directly or indirectly to the subject matters referred to, set forth in, or the facts or claims for relief which were or could have been alleged or litigated in the Action; and (4) this Settlement or the entry into it, except for breach of this Settlement. C. Unknown Claims mean: (1) any and all Released Claims that any Representative Plaintiff, Lead Plaintiff, or Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Parties, including, without limitation, claims that if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her, or its decision(s) to settle with and release the Released Parties or not to object to the Settlement, and (2) any and all Settling Defendants Claims which any Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor, including, without limitation, claims that if known by him, her or it might have affected his, her or its decision(s) with respect to the Settlement. IX. NOTICE TO BANKS, BROKERS, AND OTHER NOMINEES Banks, brokerage firms, institutions, and other Persons who are nominees and who purchased KeySpan common stock for the beneficial interest of other Persons as of any day from March 24, 2000 through and including July 17, 2001, are requested within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice to either: (1) provide the Claims Administrator with the names and addresses of such beneficial owners, preferably on computergenerated mailing labels or, electronically, in MS Word or WordPerfect files (label size Avery # 5162), or in an MS Excel data table setting forth (a) title/registration, (b) street address, (c) city/state/zip; or (2) forward a copy of this Notice to each such beneficial owner and provide the Claims Administrator with written confirmation of having done so. Additional copies of the Notice may be requested by contacting: KeySpan Corporation Securities Litigation c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Telephone: (800) Fax: (516) Website: You are entitled to the reimbursement of any reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the research of records and: (1) the generating of labels or electronic media or (2) the mailing of this Notice, after submission to the Claims Administrator of a written request, together with appropriate supporting documentation. 10

11 X. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS, AND EXPENSES To date, Representative Plaintiffs Counsel have not received any payment for their services in conducting this Litigation on behalf of the Representative Plaintiffs and the Members of the Settlement Class, nor have counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. Representative Plaintiffs Counsel in the Litigation will apply to the Court at the conclusion of the hearing described below, for an award of attorneys fees of no more than one-third (1/3) of the Settlement Fund, plus reimbursement of expenses. Such sums as the Court may grant will be paid from the Settlement Fund. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any fees or expenses awarded by the Court. The fee requested by Representative Plaintiffs Counsel will compensate them for their efforts in achieving the Settlement Fund for the benefit of the Settlement Class, and for their risk in undertaking this case on a contingent basis. If approved by the Court, the fee requested would fall within the range of fees awarded to plaintiffs counsel under similar circumstances in litigation of this type. XI. THE HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT A hearing (the Hearing ) will take place before the Honorable Allyne R. Ross, at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, at 10:00 a.m., on March 2, 2005, for the purpose of determining whether: (1) the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and appropriate of Court approval; (2) the proposed Plan of Allocation is fair, just, reasonable, and adequate; (3) the Court should approve applications of Representative Plaintiffs Counsel for an award of attorneys fees, costs and expenses; and (4) the Court should enter Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal dismissing the Litigation with prejudice as against Defendants. The Hearing may be adjourned from time to time by the Court at the Hearing or any adjourned session thereof without further notice. Any Member of the Settlement Class who has not requested exclusion may appear at the Hearing to show cause why the proposed Settlement should not be approved, or the Litigation should not be dismissed with prejudice as against the Defendants, and to present any opposition to the Plan of Allocation or the application of Representative Plaintiffs Counsel for attorneys fees, costs and expenses. However, no such Person shall be heard, unless his, her or its objection or opposition is made in writing and is filed, together with copies of all other papers and briefs by him, her or it, with the Court no later than February 9, 2005, as follows: CLERK OF THE COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, NY with copies to Lead Plaintiffs Counsel: CAULEY BOWMAN CARNEY WEISS & LURIE & WILLIAMS, PLLC -and- JOSEPH H. WEISS S. GENE CAULEY MARK D. SMILOW J. ALLEN CARNEY 551 Fifth Avenue Executive Center Drive, Suite 200 Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR New York, NY

12 and to Defendants Counsel: SIMPSON THACHER DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & BARTLETT LLP -and- & OSHINSKY, LLP MICHAEL J. CHEPIGA ROBERT J. HIGGINS PAUL C. GLUCKOW STEVEN J. ROMAN 425 Lexington Avenue 2101 L Street, N.W. New York, NY Washington, D.C Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any Member of the Settlement Class who does not make his, her, or its objection or opposition in the manner provided shall be deemed to have waived all objections and opposition to the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or to the request of Representative Plaintiffs Counsel for attorneys fees, costs and expenses. XII. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS AND INQUIRIES This Notice contains only a summary of the terms of the proposed settlement. For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in the Litigation, reference is made to the pleadings, to the Stipulation, and to other papers filed in this action, which may be inspected at the office of the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, during business hours of each business day. DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE If you have any questions about the Settlement, you may contact Lead Plaintiffs Counsel: CAULEY BOWMAN CARNEY WEISS & LURIE & WILLIAMS, PLLC -or- JOSEPH H. WEISS S. GENE CAULEY MARK D. SMILOW J. ALLEN CARNEY 551 Fifth Avenue Executive Center Drive, Suite 200 Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR New York, NY (501) (212) If you need additional copies of the Notice or Proof of Claim and Release, contact the Claims Administrator at: KeySpan Corporation Securities Litigation c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Telephone: (800) Fax: (516) Website: Dated: November 16, 2004 BY ORDER OF THE COURT 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BLUE RHINO CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. ) Master File No. ) CV-03-3495-MRP(AJWx)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and Lead Case No. C-1-00-320 All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS. Plaintiff, Index No.: /2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ADELE BRODY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 008835/2006 Justice Carolyn E. Demarest ROBERT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION In re DAISYTEK INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION Master Docket No. 4:03-CV-212 This Document Relates To: CLASS ACTION ALL ACTIONS. TO: NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE REVLON, INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. LITIGATION : 99-CV-10192 (SHS) x This Document Relates to: : All Actions : x NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA In re STRATOSPHERE CORPORATION SECURITIES ) Master File No. LITIGATION ) CV-S-96-00708-PMP-(RLH) ) This Document Relates To: ) CLASS ACTION ) ALL ACTIONS.

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Case 2:05cv00204DB Document 1053 Red 11/07/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Exhibit B IN RE imergent SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No.: 2:05-cv-0204

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH ALL DEFENDANTS, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA SARATOGA ADVANTAGE TRUST and THEODORE HYER, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. ICG, INC. a/k/a INTERNATIONAL COAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING GREEN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. WILLIAM FARLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT BOWLING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ROBERT WINN, JAMES WINN and MARVIN GILL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. IP00-0310

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RAMON GOMEZ, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. BIDZ.COM, INC., and DAVID ZINBERG, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE GLOBALSTAR SECURITIES LITIGATION 01 Civ. 1748 (PKC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION IN RE CONCORD EFS, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) No. 02-2697 Ma Judge Mays NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X In re NUTRAMAX PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES : Civil Action No. LITIGATION : 00-CV-10861 (RGS) : This document relates to: : : Each action

More information

[EXHIBIT 1] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

[EXHIBIT 1] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:02-cv-03677-JMR-FLN Document 339-1 Filed 01/11/08 Page 1 of 18 [EXHIBIT 1] IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) IN RE METRIS COMPANIES INC. ) CIVIL ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION JAMES P. MORIARTY, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 99-0225 Civ - Moreno/Dube

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE ENGINEERING ANIMATION SECURITIES CIVIL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE NICE SYSTEMS, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 2:01 CV 737 (Judge Greenaway) This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION : : : This Document Relates To: : ALL ACTIONS. : : x Master File No. 2:07-cv-03359-JS-GRB CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re SERACARE LIFE SCIENCES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master File No. 05-CV-2335-JLS(CAB CLASS ACTION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION HERBERT CROWELL, On Behalf of Himself and All ) Case No. 98-009023-AI Others Similarly

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JERRY MICHAEL CRAFTON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. SACV-07-0065-PSG (MLGx) CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ELETROBRAS SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-5754-JGK NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION;

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JOSEPH WHITE, Plaintiff, Case No. 00-C-1388 v. Hon. Joseph P. Stadtmueller (Judge) HEARTLAND HIGH-YIELD MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, et al., Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x BARBARA E. BERNARD, COURMANT AND W APNER ASSOCIATES AND ROBERT SUTHERLAND, on behal f of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, UBS W ARBURG LLC AND ANTON W AHLMAN, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS In re ) Thomas & Betts Securities Litigation ) Civil Action No. 00-CV-2127 ) TO: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SINOHUB SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions No. 1:12-cv-08478-WHP NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND DERIVATIVE LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA TRADING STRATEGIES FUND, on CIVIL DIVISION Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, No. 12-11460 Plaintiff, -against- NOORUDDIN S.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION x IN RE PROFIT RECOVERY GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION x ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action FILE No. 1:00-CV-1416-CC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re COMPLETE MANAGEMENT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 99 Civ. 1454 (NRB) This Document Relates To: All Matters NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION In re HEALTHSOUTH CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: In re HealthSouth Corporation Stockholder Litigation,

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE 360NETWORKS SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) 02 CV 4837 (MGC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS'

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION MARSHA BRODERICK, et al., On Behalf of ) No. 98-1658-MRP(AJWx) Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TERRI MORSE BACHOW, Individually on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff v. C.A. No. 3:09-CV-0262-K

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. x : : : : : : : x CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Civil Action No. 05-CV-2827-RMB ELECTRONICALLY

More information

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:14-cv JPO Document Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:14-cv-03251-JPO Document 190-2 Filed 10/02/18 Page 2 of 14 Exhibit A-1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99 IN RE SPX CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) This Document Relates To: ) ALL ACTIONS ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil Action No. 3:04CV99

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE THOMAS D. KEELEY and LINDA TALLEY HEWITT, On ) Master Case File No. 737787 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) (Consolidated

More information

District of New Hampshire X :: : X

District of New Hampshire X :: : X United States District Court District of New Hampshire In re: StockerYale, Inc. Securities Litigation. X :: : X Master File No. 1:05cv00177-SM CIVIL ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 01-cv-1451-REB-KLM (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 01-cv-1472-REB-PAC, 01-cv-1527-REB-PAC,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C 01-3952 CRB LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document Relates to:

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY!

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY! IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-01243-CMA-KMT (Consolidated for all purposes with Civil Action No. 14-cv- 01402-CMA-KMT) UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL

More information

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Eastern Division IN RE CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 03 C 8884 Honorable

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GUY RATZ, Individually and on behalf of : all others similarly situated, : : Plaintiff, : : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:13 cv 06808

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARGARET B. ADAM, On Behalf of Herself ) No. C-93-20399-RMW(EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS WALSINGHAM, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- Civil Action No. 96-809 BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 431-3 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION File No. 07-CV-5867 (PAC) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, SETTLEMENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA IN RE CABLE & WIRELESS PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS NO. 02-1860-A JUDGE GERALD BRUCE LEE NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. KPMG, LLP, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION EBRAHIM SHANEHCHIAN, et al., Plaintiff, v. MACY S, INC. et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-cv-00828-SAS-SKB Judge S. Arthur Spiegel

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDRA BALABAN, On Behalf of Civil Action No. 02-4852 Herself And All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Hon. Joel A. Pisano HENRY B. SCHACHT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Bai v. TCP International Holdings, Ltd., et al. No. 1:16-cv-00102 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master File No. 05-CV-2335-H(CAB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master File No. 05-CV-2335-H(CAB) CLASS ACTION In re SERACARE LIFE SCIENCES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master File No. 05-CV-2335-H(CAB) CLASS ACTION

More information

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM BY JULY 14, 2008 The only way to get a payment. OBJECT BY AUGUST 1, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------X ANTHONY CAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BROADCOM CORPORATION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION Lead Case No.: CV-06-5036-R (CWx) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE SYKES ENTERPRISES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Consolidated Civil Action Case No. 8:00-CV-212-T-26F THIS MATTER PERTAINS

More information

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 23, 2016 PLC Polycom, Inc Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 *P-PLC-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-5781 1-855-907-3170 wwwgardencitygroupcom/cases-info/polycomsettlement

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE SUNRUN INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-02537-VC CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 01-cv-1451-REB-CBS (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 01-cv-1472-REB-CBS, 01-cv-1527-REB-CBS, 01-cv-1616-REB-CBS, 01-cv-

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv DAK-EJF PATRICK LENTSCH, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-00012-DAK-EJF VISTA OUTDOOR INC., MARK W. DEYOUNG,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------- X PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x IN RE CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES : Civil Action No. W-04-CA-177 SECURITIES LITIGATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE COINSTAR INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: The Securities Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case No. C11-133 MJP NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information