UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. -against- Civil Action No"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS WALSINGHAM, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- Civil Action No BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC., DIASENSE, INC., DAVID L. PURDY, FRED E. COOPER and GLENN KEELING, Defendants. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND OF APPROVAL HEARING TO: ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED THE COMMON STOCK OF BIO- CONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC. ( BICO OR THE COMPANY ) FROM APRIL 25, 1995 THROUGH FEBRUARY 26, 1996, INCLUSIVE. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO THE PEN- DENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF THIS CLASS LITIGATION AND CON- TAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS TO CLASS MEMBERS RIGHTS TO OBTAIN A SHARE OF THE SETTLEMENT FUND. CLAIMS DEADLINE: CLAIMANTS MUST SUBMIT PROOFS OF CLAIM ON THE FORM ACCOMPANYING THIS NOTICE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, EXCLUSION DEADLINE: REQUESTS FOR EXCLUSION MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN AUGUST 20, SECURITIES BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES: PLEASE SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN VI, BELOW. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the Court ), that a Settlement of the above-captioned action (the Litigation ), for three million seven hundred thousand dollars ($3,700,000) has been reached by the parties, which settlement is subject to approval by the Court, and which, if approved, will result: (1) in the payment of the Settlement Fund, after certain deductions described below, to eligible Class Members who file timely and valid Proof of Claim and Release forms and evidence an actual loss; and (2) in the dismissal of the Litigation and the release of the Released Claims as against all Released Persons. 1 YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the Court, dated July 10, 2002, that a hearing (the Settlement Hearing ) will be held on September 3, 2002, at 2:00 p.m., before the Honorable Robert J. Cindrich, United States District Judge, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 7 th and Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219, to consider: (1) whether the proposed Settlement, including the Plan of Allocation, should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable and adequate; (2) whether the Litigation should be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement (the Stipulation ) dated as of June 7, 2000 on file with the Court; and (3) the application of Lead Counsel for the payment of attorneys fees and reimbursement of costs and expenses. 1 All capitalized terms have the same meaning as in the Stipulation.

2 This Notice is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an expression of any opinion by the Court with respect to the truth of the allegations in the Litigation, or the merits of the claims or defenses asserted, or the fairness or adequacy of the proposed Settlement. This Notice is merely to advise you of the pendency and proposed Settlement of the Litigation and of your rights in connection with the Settlement. A. Statement of Plaintiffs Recovery Pursuant to the Stipulation and the Settlement, Defendants are obligated to pay $3,700,000 in consideration of the settlement of the Litigation, $3,550,000 of which has been paid to the Escrow Agent on behalf of the Class, which monies have been deposited in interest-bearing accounts. Plaintiffs have obtained a judgment for the remainder and Defendants have agreed to a payment schedule, with full payment to be made by August 30, These payments shall constitute the sole and exclusive obligation of the Defendants to make any payment in connection with the Settlement. The amounts paid by Defendants, together with any interest earned thereon, constitutes the Settlement Fund. Lead Counsel estimates that purchases of more than 18 million shares were made by those who bought BICO common stock between April 25, 1995 and February 26, 1996 and held after February 26, 1996 ( Holders ). While it is highly unlikely that all eligible claimants will file claims, Lead Counsel estimate that the average recovery under the Settlement for Holders, if all eligible claimants file claims, will be approximately $.18 per share before deduction of attorneys fees and expenses. For those claimants who purchased and sold during the Class Period ( Ins-and-Outs ), Lead Counsel estimate that the average recovery under the Settlement, if all eligible claimants file claims, will be approximately $.08 per share before deduction of attorneys fees and expenses. B. Statement of Potential Outcome The parties disagreed on both liability and damages and do not agree on the amount of damages that would be recoverable if plaintiffs were to have prevailed on each claim alleged. The issues on which the parties disagree include: (1) whether statements allegedly made or facts allegedly omitted by the Defendants during the Class Period were false, material or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (2) the extent to which the various matters that plaintiffs alleged were materially false or misleading influenced the trading price of BICO common stock during the Class Period; (3) the amount by which BICO common stock was allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period, as well as the appropriate economic model for determining any alleged artificial inflation during the Class Period; and (4) the effect of various market forces influencing the trading price of BICO common stock at various times during the Class Period. C. Parties Positions and Reasons for Settlement Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel believe that the Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best interests of the Class and have agreed to settle after considering such factors as: (1) the substantial benefits to the Class under the terms of the Stipulation; (2) the attendant risks and uncertainty of litigation, especially in complex actions such as this, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation; (3) the desirability of consummating the Settlement promptly, in order to provide effective relief to the Class; and (4) BICO s financial condition and the lack of insurance coverage for the claims asserted in the Litigation. Defendants deny any wrongdoing and do not admit or concede any actual or potential fault, wrongdoing or liability in connection with any facts or claims that have been alleged against them in the litigation, but consider it desirable for the Litigation to be settled and dismissed because this Settlement will: (1) avoid further disruption of the management and operation of the Company s business due to the pendency and defense of the Litigation; (2) finally put the Litigation to rest; and (3) avoid the substantial expense, burdens and uncertainties associated with continued litigation. D. Statement of Attorneys Fees and Costs Under the terms of the Stipulation, Lead Counsel may apply for an award of attorneys fees in an amount not to exceed one-third of the Settlement Fund, as well as reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the prosecution of the Litigation, together with interest thereon. The expenses are estimated not to exceed $90,000. For Holders, attorneys fees and expenses are estimated to be $.06 per share. For Ins-and-Outs, attorneys fees and expenses are estimated to be $.03 per share. 2

3 E. Identification of Plaintiffs Lawyers Any questions regarding the Settlement should be directed to the following Lead Counsel for the Representative Plaintiffs and the Class: Joseph H. Weiss, Esq. Jules Brody, Esq. Jack I. Zwick, Esq. STULL, STULL & BRODY WEISS & YOURMAN 6 East 45 th Street 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600 Suite 500 New York, NY New York, NY (212) (212) I. HISTORY OF THE LITIGATION On April 30, 1996, the captioned action, the first of several lawsuits brought as securities class actions arising from the same circumstances and events and alleging similar claims, was filed in the United States District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania, and assigned to the Honorable Robert J. Cindrich. Named as Defendants were Biocontrol Technology, Inc., Diasense, Inc., David L. Purdy, Fred E. Cooper and Glenn Keeling. Pursuant to orders of the Court, the subsequently filed cases were consolidated with and into the lead action, Walsingham, et al. v. Biocontrol Technology, Inc., et al. In accordance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ( PSLRA ), the Court appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel (identified above). The parties also stipulated to, and the Court entered, an Order certifying the lawsuit as a class action on behalf of the following Class. All persons who purchased the common stock of Biocontrol Technology, Inc. ( BICO ) during the period between April 25, 1995 and February 26, 1996 inclusive. Excluded from the Class are the Defendants, members of their families and their legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors and assigns, any subsidiaries or affiliates of BICO, any entity in which BICO has a controlling interest, or which is controlled by or is a parent or subsidiary of BICO, and the officers, directors, employees and affiliates of any of the Defendants. Lead Plaintiffs allege that Defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions regarding the efficacy and reliability of BICO s primary product, the Diasensor, its prospects for Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) approval and its marketability. Lead Plaintiffs further alleged that, as a result of Defendants misrepresentations and concealment of the truth, the price of BICO s stock was artificially inflated. Specifically, Lead Plaintiffs alleged that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants issued misleading press releases and made misleading public statements touting the Diasensor 1000 s effectiveness and reliability and projecting its imminent approval by the FDA, and that Defendants knowingly created the false impression that BICO was ready to begin the marketing phase of the Diasensor 1000 and was poised to capture the mega-million dollar market for non-invasive glucose testing. On February 26, 1996 (the end of the Class Period), the FDA s Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Toxicology Devices Panel held a public review meeting at which its members unanimously refused to recommend FDA clearance to market the Diasensor In response, BICO s stock price plummeted, causing damage to Class Members. Defendants moved to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) and under provisions of the PSLRA. Following extensive briefing of the motion by both sides, the Court, in a Memorandum Opinion dated December 1, 1998, denied Defendants motion and sustained the complaint in its entirety. In addition to their pre-filing investigation, Lead Counsel obtained and reviewed tens of thousands of pages of documents from Defendants and third parties during the prosecution of the Litigation. Lead Counsel also retained a damages expert on behalf of the Class. Thereafter, the parties engaged in extensive settlement negotiations, assisted by the Court, resulting in the Settlement. 3

4 II. CLAIMS OF THE REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS AND BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT Class Counsel believe that the claims asserted in the Litigation have merit. However, Class Counsel recognize and acknowledge the expense and length of continued proceedings necessary to prosecute the Litigation against the Defendants through trial and through appeals, and the non-existence of any insurance coverage for the claims in the Litigation and the financial condition of the Company. Class Counsel have also taken into account the uncertainties and risks in litigation, especially in complex actions such as this Litigation, as well as the difficulties and delays inherent in such litigation. Class Counsel are also mindful of the inherent problems of proof under, and possible defenses to, the violations of law asserted in the Litigation. Class Counsel believe that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation confers substantial benefits upon the Class. Based on their evaluation, Class Counsel have determined that the Settlement is in the best interests of the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class. III. DEFENDANTS STATEMENT AND DENIALS OF WRONGDOING AND LIABILITY Defendants have expressly denied and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts or omissions alleged in the Litigation. Defendants have also denied and continue to deny, inter alia, the allegations that the Lead Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered any damage, that the price of BICO common stock was artificially inflated as a result of the alleged misrepresentations, non-disclosures or otherwise, and that the Lead Plaintiffs or the Class were harmed in any way by the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Nonetheless, the Defendants have concluded that the continuation of the Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation in order to limit further expense, inconvenience and distraction, to dispose of burdensome and protracted litigation, and to permit the operation of the Company s business without the further expense of litigation. Defendants have also taken into account the uncertainty and risks inherent in any litigation, especially in complex cases like this Litigation. Defendants have, therefore, determined that it is desirable and beneficial that the Litigation be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation. IV. DISTRIBUTION OF THE SETTLEMENT FUND AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION Upon approval of the Settlement by the Court, satisfaction of the other conditions of the Settlement provided for in the Stipulation and subject to the Court s further orders, direction and supervision, the Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows: 1. To pay (a) the costs and expenses associated with providing notice and administration of the Settlement; (b) Taxes and Tax Expenses; and (c) such attorneys fees, costs and expenses and payments to Lead Plantiffs as may be awarded by the Court. 2. To distribute the balance of the Settlement Fund (the Net Settlement Fund ) to Class Members who timely submit a valid Proof of Claim and Release ( Authorized Claimants ), in accordance with the Plan of Allocation described below. Subject to the approval and further order(s) of the Court as may be necessary, the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the following terms and Plan of Allocation: 1. Each Person claiming to be an Authorized Claimant shall be required to timely submit a separate Proof of Claim and Release in the form accompanying this Notice, signed under penalty of perjury and supported by the required proof set forth therein. 2. All Proof of Claim and Release forms must be sent to the Claims Administrator and postmarked on or before November 1, Unless otherwise ordered by this Court, Class Members who fail to submit a Proof of Claim and Release within that period, or such other period as may be ordered by the Court, shall be forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to the Settlement, but will, in all other respects, be subject to the provisions of the Stipulation and the Judgment entered by the Court. 4

5 3. A Recognized Loss will be computed as follows: the Recognized Loss shall be equal to the amount paid for shares of BICO common stock purchased by Class Members during the Class Period, less: (a) the amount realized from the sale of any such shares during the Class Period; or (b) the number of any such shares held at the close of business on February 26, 1996, multiplied by $2.44. YOUR CLAIM WILL NOT BE VALID IF YOU DID NOT SUFFER AN ACTUAL LOSS. 4. Purchase/Sale Dates the date of purchase or sale is the contract or trade date and not the settlement date. 5. Gains and Losses all profits will be subtracted from all losses to determine the net Recognized Loss of each Class Member. 6. FIFO in processing claims, the first-in, first-out basis ( FIFO ) will be applied to both purchases and sales. Sales will be matched in chronological order, by trade date, first against the securities held as of the close of trading on April 24, 1995 (the last day before the Class Period begins) and then against the purchases during the Class Period. 7. Short Sales the date of covering a short sale is deemed to be the date of purchase of BICO shares. The date of a short sale is deemed to be the date of sale of BICO shares. Shares sold short prior to the Class Period and purchased or boxed to cover during the Class Period shall have no Recognized Loss. 8. To the extent there are sufficient funds in the Net Settlement Fund, each Authorized Claimant will receive an amount equal to the Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss. If, however, the amount in the Net Settlement Fund is not sufficient to permit payment of the total Recognized Loss of each Authorized Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage that each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss bears to the total of the Recognized Losses of all Authorized Claimants. 9. Options Exercises of option contracts will be considered as purchases or sales of common stock. Therefore, the cost or proceeds of option purchases/sales (excluding commissions and taxes) should be incorporated into the purchase or sale price of the shares of common stock. 10. Multiple Transactions if an Authorized Claimant s trading activity during the Settlement Class Period exceeds 70 transactions, you must provide, in an electronic file, all purchase and sales information required in the Proof of Claim and Release. For a copy of instructions and parameters concerning such a submission, contact the Claims Administrator by phone: (800) ; by fax (516) or via the web at: De Minimis No payment will be made on a claim where the potential distribution amount is $10.00 or less. 12. The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the claim of any Class Member on equitable grounds. 13. Although the Net Settlement Fund is being allocated among Class Members based on the formula stated above, it should not be assumed that an Authorized Claimant s Recognized Loss is equal to the amount of damages, if any, which could have been recovered had this Litigation been fully tried instead of settled. The amount of damages which Lead Plaintiffs could prove, if any, is a matter of serious dispute, and the Settlement s use of the formula set forth above does not constitute a concession, finding or admission that any damages could be proven or that provable damages, if any, would be commensurate with a Recognized Loss. No determination has been made by the Court as to whether any Class Member suffered any damages, or as to the proper measure of any damages. The determination of damages, like the determination of liability, is a complicated and uncertain process, typically involving conflicting expert opinions. The Settlement avoids the risks that liability or damages might not have been proven at trial. 14. Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation set forth herein shall be deemed conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No Person shall have any claim against any plaintiffs counsel, or the Claims Administrator or other agent designated by Lead Counsel, or against Released Persons or Defendants counsel based on distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation and the Settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further orders of the Court. 5

6 15. All Class Members who fail to complete and file a valid and timely Proof of Claim and Release shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Stipulation, including the terms of any Judgment entered and the releases given. V. DISMISSAL AND RELEASES If the proposed Settlement is approved by the Court, the Court will enter a Judgment which will: 1. Dismiss the Litigation in its entirety as against Defendants with prejudice and without costs to any party as against any other party; 2. Adjudge that the Lead Plaintiffs and each Class Member, except those who both timely and validly request exclusion in accordance with the procedures detailed herein, shall be deemed conclusively to have released the Released Claims against the Released Persons; 3. Bar and permanently enjoin each of the Lead Plaintiffs and Class Members from prosecuting the Released Claims against the Released Persons; and 4. Reserve jurisdiction, without affecting the finality of the Judgment entered, over: a. Implementation of this Settlement and any award or distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, including interest earned or accrued thereon; b. Disposition of the Settlement Fund and the Net Settlement Fund; c. Hearing and determining Lead Counsel s applications for attorneys fees, costs, interest, and expenses, including fees and costs of experts and/or consultants; d. Enforcing and administering the Stipulation, including any releases executed in connection therewith; and e. Other matters related or ancillary to any of the foregoing. VI. SPECIAL NOTICE TO BANKS, BROKERS, AND OTHER NOMINEES Banks, brokerage firms, institutions, and other Persons who are nominees who purchased BICO common stock for the beneficial interest of other Persons as of any day from April 25, 1995 through February 26, 1996, inclusive, are directed, within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice, to: (1) provide the Claims Administrator with the names and addresses of such beneficial owners, preferably on computer-generated mailing labels or, if there are more than 2,000, on a 3 1 2" diskette, CD-ROM or ZIP/JAZ media; or (2) forward copies of this Notice and the Proof of Claim and Release to each such beneficial owner and provide the Claims Administrator with written confirmation that these documents have been so forwarded. Additional copies of these documents may be requested in writing from the Claims Administrator for forwarding to such beneficial owners. You are entitled to reimbursement of any reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the foregoing upon submission of a request and the appropriate supporting documentation to the Claims Administrator. All correspondence should be addressed as follows: Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Fax: (516) Website: 6

7 VII. THE FEE AND EXPENSE APPLICATION Lead Counsel will apply to the Court at the Settlement Hearing for an aggregate award of counsel fees of up to thirty-three and one-third percent (33-1/3%) of the Settlement Fund, plus litigation expenses not to exceed $90,000, together with interest earned on said sums at the same rate and for the same periods as earned by the Settlement Fund. Such awards as may be granted by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund, and Lead Counsel have reserved the right to make additional applications for fees and expenses incurred relating to the Settlement. The fees sought by Lead Counsel are customary in actions brought on a contingency fee basis, and Lead Counsel believe they are justified by the risks they assumed, the complexity of the Litigation, the time and effort already invested in the prosecution of the Litigation, and the result achieved, as well as the time and effort that will be required of Lead Counsel prior to final approval of this Settlement. The expense reimbursement sought by Lead Counsel consists of expenses actually incurred in the prosecution of the Litigation. In addition, Lead Plaintiffs will seek awards of no more than $4,500 each as reimbursement for their time and expenses spent in connection with the Litigation. VIII. THE RIGHTS OF CLASS MEMBERS If you are a member of the Class, you may receive the benefit of, and you will be bound by, the terms of the proposed Settlement described in this Notice, upon approval of the Settlement by the Court. You may, but are not required to, enter an appearance through counsel of your own choosing at your own expense. If you do not do so, you will be represented by Lead Counsel. If you are a Class Member, you have the following options: 1. You may file a Proof of Claim and Release. If you choose this option, you will remain a Class Member; you will share in the proceeds of the proposed Settlement, if your claim is timely and validly filed and if the proposed Settlement is approved by the Court; and you will be bound by the Judgment and releases. 2. If you do not wish to be included in the Settlement, and you do not wish to participate in the proposed Settlement described in this Notice, you may request to be excluded. To do so, you must state in writing that you wish to be excluded from the proposed Settlement. Your written request for exclusion must also set forth the name of this Litigation, Walsingham v. Biocontrol Technology, Inc., et al., Civil Action No , and state your name, address and telephone number, and the name, address and telephone number of the record owner of BICO common stock if different from your own, the beneficial owner. The exclusion request must also state the number of shares of BICO common stock you purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period, and the number of shares of BICO common stock you sold during the Class Period, along with the dates of your purchase(s) and sale(s). The written exclusion request should be sent to: Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Fax: (516) Website: with a copy to Lead Counsel: Joseph H. Weiss, Esq., Weiss & Yourman, 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600, New York, NY To be considered valid, the exclusion request must be postmarked no later than August 20, If you validly request exclusion from the Class: (a) you will be excluded from the Class; (b) you will not share in the proceeds of the Settlement described herein; (c) you will not be bound by any Judgment entered in the Litigation; and (d) you will not be precluded from otherwise prosecuting an individual claim at your own expense, if timely, against Defendants based on the matters complained of in the Litigation. If you do not request to be excluded from the Class, you will be bound by any and all determinations or judgments in the Litigation concerning the Settlement entered or approved by the Court. 7

8 4. Any Class Member who has not requested exclusion and wishes to object and show cause why the proposed Settlement should or should not be approved and the Litigation should or should not be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and/or to present any opposition to the Plan of Allocation or the application of Lead Counsel for fees and expenses must appear, in person or by mail at the Settlement Hearing; provided, however, that no such Class Member shall be heard, unless the Class Member wishing to make such objection has filed with the Clerk of the Court, United States District Court, 7 th and Grant, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219: (a) written notice of his, her or its intention to appear and object, which briefly sets forth each objection and the basis therefor and includes copies of any documents in support thereof, as well as copies of confirmation slips or other documents evidencing the objector s status as a Class Member; and (b) proof of service that such written notice and papers have been served by either first class mail, postage prepaid, or by hand delivery on or before August 27, 2002, upon each of the following: Joseph H. Weiss, Esq. Ralph A. Finizio, Esq. Jack I. Zwick, Esq. HOUSTON HARBAUGH, P.C. WEISS & YOURMAN 2 Chatham Center 551 Fifth Avenue, Ste th Floor New York, NY Pittsburgh, PA Plaintiffs Counsel Defendants Counsel Such written notice of objections and any papers relating thereto should expressly refer to Walsingham v. Biocontrol Technology, Inc., et al., Civil Action No The Court will not consider any objections or related papers that are not filed and served in compliance with the procedures above. Any of the Settling Parties may file in the Court, and serve upon any Person filing a written objection, papers in reply to the objections. Unless the Court otherwise orders, any Person who does not timely file and serve an objection to the Stipulation and proposed Settlement set forth therein, or to any proposed order or judgment thereon, or to the Fee and Expense Application, shall be deemed to have waived the right to object, including the right to appeal, and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the Settlement including, the Plan of Allocation and to any order or judgment entered thereon, or to the Fee and Expense Application and any order or judgment entered thereon. 5. You may do nothing at all. If you choose this option, you will not share in the proceeds of the Settlement, but you will be bound by the Judgment just as if you had filed a Proof of Claim and Release. IX. EXAMINATION OF PAPERS AND INQUIRIES For a more detailed statement of the matters involved in the Litigation and the Settlement thereof, reference is made to the pleadings, to the Stipulation and to other papers filed in the Litigation, which may be inspected at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court, for the Western District of Pennsylvania, 7 th and Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA during the business hours of each business day. Inquiries regarding the Litigation or this Notice should be addressed as follows: Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Telephone: (800) Fax: (516) Website: DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK S OFFICE REGARDING THIS NOTICE. Dated: July 10, 2002 BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 8

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENNIS WALSINGHAM, on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, -against- Civil Action No BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC., DIASENSE, INC., DAVID L. PURDY, FRED E. COOPER and GLENN KEELING, Defendants. PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: NOVEMBER 1, 2002 IF YOU PURCHASED BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY, INC. ( BICO ) COMMON STOCK DURING THE PERIOD APRIL 25, 1995 THROUGH FEBRUARY 26, 1996, INCLUSIVE (THE CLASS PERIOD ), YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS. EXCLUDED FROM THE CLASS ARE THE DEFENDANTS, MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES AND THEIR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, PREDECESSORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, ANY SUBSIDIARIES OR AFFILIATES OF BICO, ANY ENTITY IN WHICH BICO HAS A CONTROLLING INTEREST, OR WHICH IS CONTROLLED BY OR IS A PARENT OR SUBSIDIARY OF BICO, AND THE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND AFFILIATES OF ANY OF THE DEFENDANTS. IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR ANY SET- TLEMENT BENEFITS, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN THIS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE AND MAIL IT BY PRE-PAID, FIRST CLASS MAIL, POST- MARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 1, 2002 TO: Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY YOUR FAILURE TO SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM POSTMARKED BY NOVEMBER 1, 2002 MAY SUBJECT YOUR CLAIM TO REJECTION AND PRECLUDE YOUR RECEIVING ANY MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF THIS LITIGATION. DO NOT MAIL OR DELIVER YOUR CLAIM TO THE COURT OR TO ANY OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR COUNSEL, AS ANY SUCH CLAIM WILL BE DEEMED NOT TO HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM ONLY TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR. 9

10 If you are NOT a Class Member DO NOT submit a Proof of Claim and Release. If you are a Class Member and you do not properly and timely request exclusion in connection with the proposed Settlement, you will be bound by the terms of any judgment entered in the Litigation WHETHER OR NOT YOU SUBMIT A PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Submission of this Proof of Claim and Release, however, does not assure that you will share in the proceeds of Settlement in the Litigation. INSTRUCTIONS 1. If you purchased BICO common stock and held the certificate(s) in your name, you are the beneficial owner as well as the record owner. If, however, you purchased BICO common stock and the certificate(s) were registered in the name of a third party, such as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial owner and the third party is the record owner. 2. Use Part I of this form entitled Claimant Information to identify each beneficial owner and, if different, each record owner, of BICO common stock which form the basis of this claim. 3. THIS CLAIM MUST BE FILED BY THE ACTUAL BENEFICIAL OWNER OR OWNERS, OR THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF SUCH OWNER OR OWNERS, OF THE BICO COMMON STOCK UPON WHICH THIS CLAIM IS BASED. 4. All joint owners must sign this claim. Executors, administrators, guardians, conservators and trustees must complete and sign this claim on behalf of Persons represented by them, documentation establishing their authority must accompany this claim, and their titles or capacities must be stated. The Social Security (or taxpayer identification) number and telephone number of the beneficial owner may be used in verifying the claim. Failure to provide the foregoing information could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of the claim. 5. Use Part II, A, B, C and D of this form entitled Schedule of Transactions in BICO Common Stock to supply all required details of your transaction(s) in BICO common stock. If you need more space or additional schedules, attach separate sheets giving all of the required information in substantially the same form. Sign and print your name and Social Security or Tax Identification Number at the top of each additional sheet. 6. On the schedules, provide all of the requested information with respect to all of your purchases and all of your sales of BICO common stock which took place during the Class Period, whether such transactions resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all such transactions may result in the rejection of your claim. 7. List each transaction separately and in chronological order, by trade date, beginning with the earliest. You must accurately provide the month, day and year of each transaction you list. 8. Purchase/Sale Dates The date of purchase or sale is the contract or trade date and not the settlement date. 9. Gains and Losses All profits will be subtracted from all losses to determine the net recognized loss of each Class Member. 10. FIFO In processing claims, the first-in, first-out basis ( FIFO ) will be applied to both purchases and sales. Sales will be matched in chronological order, by trade date, first against the securities held as of the close of trading on April 24, 1995 (the last day before the Class Period begins) and then against the purchases during the Class Period. 11. Short Sales The date of covering a short sale is deemed to be the date of purchase of BICO common stock. The date of a short sale is deemed to be the date of sale of BICO common stock. Shares sold short prior to the Class Period and purchased or boxed to cover during the Class Period shall have no Recognized Loss. 10

11 12. Options Exercises of option contracts will be considered as purchases or sales of common stock. Therefore, the cost or proceeds of option purchases/sales (excluding commissions and taxes) should be incorporated into the purchase or sale price of the shares of common stock. 13. Multiple Transactions If an Authorized Claimants trading activity during the Class Period exceeds 70 transactions, you must provide, in an electronic file, all purchase and sales information required in the Proof of Claim. For a copy of instructions and parameters concerning such a submission, contact the Claims Administrator by phone: (800) ; by fax (516) or via the web at: De Minimis No payment will be made on a claim where the potential distribution amount is $10.00 or less. 15. Brokerage commissions and transfer taxes paid by you in connection with your purchase and sale of BICO common stock should NOT be included in computing the purchase and sale prices. 16. Copies of brokers confirmations or other documentation of your transactions in BICO common stock should be attached to your claim. If such documents are not available, a complete list of supporting documentation can be found on the claims administration website, Failure to provide this documentation could delay verification of your claim or result in rejection of your claim. 11

12 BIOCONTROL TECHNOLOGY SECURITIES LITIGATION Must be Received by Claims Administrator Postmarked No Later Than November 1, 2002 Please Type or Print PART I: CLAIMANT INFORMATION Beneficial Owner s Name (as it appears on your brokerage statement) Joint Beneficial Owner s Name (as it appears on your brokerage statement) Street Address City State Zip Code HERE Foreign Province Foreign Country Individual Social Security Number or Tax Identification Number Corporation/Other (Work) (Cellular) Area Code Telephone Number Area Code Telephone Number (Home) Area Code Telephone Number Area Code Fax Number Address Record Owner s Name (if different from beneficial owner listed above) 12 DETACH

13 PART II: SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN BICO COMMON STOCK 1. State the total number of shares of BICO common stock owned at the close of trading on April 24, 1995, long or short (must be documented): 2. Separately list each and every purchase of BICO common stock during the period April 25, 1995 through and including February 26, 1996, and provide the following information (must be documented): Trade Dates of Purchases Price Per Share (list chronologically) Number of Shares (excluding commissions, Month/Day/Year Purchased taxes & fees) DETACH HERE 3. Separately list each and every sale of BICO common stock during the period April 25, 1995 through and including February 26, 1996, and provide the following information (must be documented): Trade Dates of Sales Price Per Share (list chronologically) (excluding commissions, Month/Day/Year Number of Shares Sold taxes & fees) 4. State the total number of shares of BICO common stock owned at the close of trading on February 26, 1996, long or short (must be documented): If you require additional space, attach separate sheets in the same format as above. Sign and print your name and Social Security/Tax Identification Number on top. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE ATTACHED YOU MUST ALSO READ, SIGN, AND SUBMIT THE SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION AND RELEASE WHICH FOLLOWS 13

14 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION OF COURT AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I (We) submit this Proof of Claim and Release under the terms of the Stipulation described in the Notice. By submitting this Proof of Claim and Release, I (we) state that I (we) believe in good faith that I am (we are) a Class Member as defined above and in the Notice, or I am (we are) acting for such Person; that I (we) have read and understand the Notice; that I (we) believe that I am (we are) entitled to receive a share of the Net Settlement Fund; and that I (we) elect to participate in the proposed Settlement described in the Notice. I (We) also submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania with respect to my (our) claim as a Class Member and for purposes of enforcing the release set forth herein and any judgment that may be entered in the Litigation. I (we) further acknowledge that I am (we are) bound by, and subject to, the terms of any judgment that may be entered in the Litigation. I (We) have set forth where requested above all relevant information with respect to each purchase of BICO common stock during the Class Period, and each sale, if any, of such shares. I (We) have also enclosed photocopies of the stockbroker s confirmation slips, stockbroker s statements, relevant portions of my (our) tax returns or other documents evidencing each purchase, sale or retention of BICO common stock listed above in support of my (our) claim. [NOTE: IF ANY SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN YOUR POS- SESSION, PLEASE OBTAIN COPIES OR EQUIVALENT DOCUMENTS FROM YOUR BROKER OR TAX ADVISOR. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO PROVE AND PROCESS YOUR CLAIM.] I (We) agree to furnish additional information to Lead Counsel or their agent to support this claim if required to do so. I (We) have not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases or sales of BICO common stock during the Class Period and know of no other Person having done so on my (our) behalf. RELEASE A. I (We) hereby acknowledge full and complete satisfaction of, and do hereby fully, finally and forever settle, release and discharge each and all of the Released Persons from any and all Released Claims. Released Claims means and includes the allegations, claims and causes of action that have been asserted against the Released Persons in the Litigation. Released Persons means the Defendants. Defendants means BICO, Diasense, David L. Purdy, Fred E. Cooper and Glenn Keeling. B. When the Settlement becomes effective, each of the Class Members (except a Class Member who has been properly excluded from the Class), anyone claiming through or on behalf of any of them, will be forever barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting or prosecuting any action, against any of the Released Parties raising or asserting any of the Released Claims. Furthermore, pending final determination as to whether the Settlement contained in the Stipulation should be approved, Class Members (except a Class Member who has been properly excluded from the Class) are barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, or prosecuting any action of the Released Claims, against any of the Released Parties. C. This Release shall be of no force or effect unless and until the Court approves the Stipulation and the Settlement becomes effective. D. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have not assigned or transferred or purported to assign or transfer, voluntarily or involuntarily, any matter released pursuant to this Release or any other part or portion thereof. E. I (We) hereby warrant and represent that I (we) have included information about all of my (our) transactions in BICO common stock which occurred during the Class Period, as well as the number of shares of BICO common stock held by me (us) as of the close of trading on April 24, 1995, and at the close of trading on February 26, F. I (We) certify that I am (we are) not subject to backup withholding under the provisions of 3406(a)(1)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. 14 HERE DETACH

15 Note: If you have been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you are subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language that you are not subject to backup withholding in the certification above. I (We) declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that the foregoing information supplied by the undersigned is true and correct and that this Proof of Claim and Release Form was executed this day of, 2002, at. (City, State, Country) (Signature of Claimant) (Type or print your name here) (Signature of Joint Claimant) (Type or print your name here) DETACH HERE (Capacity of Persons signing, e.g., Beneficial Purchaser, Executor or Administrator) ACCURATE CLAIMS PROCESSING TAKES A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. Reminder Checklist: 1. Please sign the above release and declaration. 2. Remember to attach acceptable supporting documentation, a complete list of which can be found on the website address, below. 3. Do not send originals of securities certificates. 4. Keep a copy of the completed claim form for your records. 5. If you desire an acknowledgment of receipt of your claim form, please send it Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. 6. If you move, or if this was sent to you at an old or incorrect address, please send us your new address. 7. If you have any questions concerning this claim form contact: Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY Telephone: (800) Fax: (516) Website: 15

16 Claims Administrator Biocontrol Technology Securities Litigation c/o Berdon LLP P.O. Box 9014 Jericho, NY FIRST-CLASS MAIL U.S. POSTAGE PAID PEARL PRESSMAN LIBERTY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re ELAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02-CV-0865(RMB)(FM) This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. CLASS ACTION PROOF OF

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION MARVIN E. SIKES, v. Plaintiff, CRAIG A. WINN, THOMAS MORGAN, REX SCATENA and DEAN M. JOHNSON, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. v. Case No Civ - Moreno/Dube UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION JAMES P. MORIARTY, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 99-0225 Civ - Moreno/Dube

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. No. 4:10-MD Honorable Keith P. Ellison PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re BP p.l.c. Securities Litigation No. 4:10-MD-02185 Honorable Keith P. Ellison I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE KIDDER PEABODY SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File Civil Action No. 94 Civ. 3954 (BSJ)(MHD) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No. 12-C-884-JPS CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS and ROBERT LIFSON, Plaintiffs, v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC. and LAURIE BEBO, Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN Case

More information

EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA IN RE YONGYE INTERNATIONAL, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION Consolidated Case No. A-12-670468-B DEPT. NO.: XI Consolidated with: A-12-670758-B A-12-670874-B

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must be Postmarked (if Mailed) or Received (if Submitted Online) No Later Than June 29, 2018 PO Box 10552 1-866-281-1098 info@plygemsecuritiessettlementcom wwwplygemsecuritiessettlementcom PGH *P-PGH-POC/1*

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHINA MOBILE GAMES & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:14-CV-04471 (KMW) This Document Relates To: All Actions Deadline

More information

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017

Proof of Claim and Release Form DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION: AUGUST 4, 2017 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 4, 2017 In re Energy Recovery, Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10358 Dublin, OH 43017-0358 (844) 634-8908 Fax: (855) 409-7129 Questions@EnergyRecoverySecuritiesLitigationcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION MIDDLESEX RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, Case No. CV 06-6863-DOC

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Xybernaut Securities Litigation Settlement c/o Analytics Inc., Claims Administrator P.O. Box 2007 Chanhassen, MN 55317-2007 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Complete and Sign this Form and Return Postmarked

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Autoliv Securities Litigation Website: www.autolivsecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@autolivsecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 4259 Toll Free: 1-877-880-0181 Portland, OR 97208-4259

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM In the United States District Court For the Western District of Oklahoma NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and On Behalf of All Others

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE RAYTHEON COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION CONSOLIDATED C.A. NO. 19018 NC NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM FORM AND RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 14, 2014 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS VACATION FUND, et al., v. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP, PLC, et al.

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN RE SEMGROUP ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P., SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 08-MD-1989-GKF-FHM I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : x STANLEY YEDLOWSKI, etc., v. Plaintiffs, ROKA BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants x UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : Case No. 14-CV-8020-FLW-TJB NOTICE OF: (1) PENDENCY

More information

x : : : : : : : x INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

x : : : : : : : x INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re PALL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To ALL ACTIONS. x x Master File No. 207-cv-03359-JS-GRB CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM

More information

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL

COURT Case 2 : 04-cv RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 NOV ^ [CENL-7'^AL Case 2 : 04-cv-06180 -RC Document 264 Filed 11/08 /20 q@.^1wa7ict COURT NOV ^ 8 2007 [CENL-7'^AL CT F CALIFORNIA DEPUTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Deadline for Submission: September 15, 2017 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IF YOU PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED CAESARSTONE, LTD. COMMON STOCK ( CAESARSTONE ) DURING THE PERIOD FROM FEBRUARY 12, 2014

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ROBERT WINN, JAMES WINN and MARVIN GILL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, No. IP00-0310

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION BRAD MAUSS, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, NUVASIVE, INC., ALEXIS V. LUKIANOV,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SANDRA KAFENBAUM and STEVEN SCHULMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, CA 00 413L vs. GTECH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY Must be Postmarked No Later Than June 28, 2006 UNR Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator *P-UNRF-APOC/1* PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DIVISION IN RE ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. Master File No. 07 C 7083 SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE REVLON, INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. LITIGATION : 99-CV-10192 (SHS) x This Document Relates to: : All Actions : x NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action and Final Approval Hearing

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 1:11-CV JGK PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Plaintiff, - against - U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements), Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE FOAMEX SECURITIES LITIGATION 99 CV 3004 (DC) NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING THEREON TO: ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES

More information

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH

Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box Dublin, OH Must be Postmarked No Later Than November 22, 2018 Nathan v. Matta et al. Shareholder Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10634 Dublin, OH 43017-9234 www.nathanvmattashareholderslitigation.com SRM *P-SRM-POC/1*

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOSEPH BULWA, MICHAEL MOHAMADIFAR, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs, PARADIGM TECHNOLOGY, INC., ROBERT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE In re General Electric Co. Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE To recover from the Net Settlement Fund as

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Enzymotec Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: 844-418-6627 Claims Administrator Website: www.enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4079 Email: info@enzymotecsecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR

More information

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

: : CLASS ACTION : : : : : : : : : NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN

More information

Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH

Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box Dublin, OH Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 29, 2016 Doral Securities Litigation Claims Administrator c/o GCG PO Box 10284 Dublin, OH 43017-5784 wwwdoralsecuritieslitigationcom DFI *P-DFI-POC/1* ID Number:

More information

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:12-cv VEC Document Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 21 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 177-1 Filed 03/26/15 Page 2 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X In re NUTRAMAX PRODUCTS, INC. SECURITIES : Civil Action No. LITIGATION : 00-CV-10861 (RGS) : This document relates to: : : Each action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION GUANGYI XU, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. Case No: 2:15-cv-07952-CAS (RAOx) CHINACACHE INTERNATIONAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION AT MEMPHIS In re ) Thomas & Betts Securities Litigation ) Civil Action No. 00-CV-2127 ) TO: NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2

Case 1:11-cv CM Document Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A-2 Case 1:11-cv-02279-CM Document 103-3 Filed 04/25/13 Page 2 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re COMPLETE MANAGEMENT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 99 Civ. 1454 (NRB) This Document Relates To: All Matters NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED

More information

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1

Case 2:09-cv CMR Document Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 1 of 24 EXHIBIT A-1 Case 2:09-cv-04730-CMR Document 184-2 Filed 03/14/14 Page 2 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARTHUR MENALDI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, -against- Plaintiff(s), Civil Action No. 14 Civ. 3251 (JPO) OCH-ZIFF

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 26, 2018 Vista Outdoor Inc Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10603 Dublin, OH 43017-9203 1-888-558-9299 info@vistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom wwwvistaoutdoorsecuritiessettlementcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE SHUFFLE MASTER, INC. Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00715-KJD-RJJ SECURITIES LITIGATION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND HEARING If you

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:12-cv-11044-DJC Document 70-4 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:12-CV-11044

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Civil Action No. 05-cv-01265-WDM-MEH (Consolidated with 05-cv-01344-WDM-MEH) WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, STARTEK, INC.,

More information

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF (i) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, (ii) REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEYS EXPENSES, AND (iii) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL MONAHAN, on behalf of himself And all persons similarly interested Civil Action No. 02-CV-496M Plaintiffs, v. ARTHUR ANDERSEN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman IN RE SHOPKO SECURITIES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN : : : No. 01-C-1034 Judge Adelman NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND APPLICATION

More information

IXIA CLAIM FORM GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

IXIA CLAIM FORM GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN JUNE 23, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System v. Ixia, et al. CASE NO. CV13-08440-DMG(SHx)

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE MDCO Securities Litigation Toll-Free Number: (888) 653-7709 Claims Administrator Website: www.mdcosecuritieslitigation.com PO Box 4230 Email: info@mdcosecuritieslitigation.com Portland OR 97208-4230 Deadline

More information

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281

Polycom, Inc. Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 Must be Postmarked No Later Than August 23, 2016 PLC Polycom, Inc Settlement c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10281 *P-PLC-POC/1* Dublin, OH 43017-5781 1-855-907-3170 wwwgardencitygroupcom/cases-info/polycomsettlement

More information

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website:

P.O. Box Dublin, OH Toll-Free: (877) Settlement Website: SAP Must be Postmarked No Later Than Arena Securities Litigation April 13, 2018 c/o GCG *P-SAP-POC/1* PO Box 10526 Dublin, OH 43017-0526 Toll-Free: (877) 981-9683 Settlement Website: wwwarenapharmaceuticalsclassactionsettlementcom

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. v. C.A. No MLW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. v. C.A. No MLW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE MOLTEN METAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION C.A. No. 97-10325-MLW MARILYN AXLER, et al., Plaintiffs, SCIENTIFIC ECOLOGY GROUP, INC.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DAVE CARLTON, et al., v. Plaintiffs, No.: 4:15-cv-00012 CLASS ACTION District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal FRED CANNON, et al., Defendants.

More information

Puda Securities Litigation Claims Administrator PO Box 2838 Portland, OR PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FOR THE CLASS ACTION

Puda Securities Litigation Claims Administrator PO Box 2838 Portland, OR PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FOR THE CLASS ACTION Exhibit D Puda Securities Litigation Claims Administrator PO Box 2838 Portland, OR 97208-2838 PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FOR THE CLASS ACTION THIS PROOF OF CLAIM MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN MAY 13,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re BLUE RHINO CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. ) Master File No. ) CV-03-3495-MRP(AJWx)

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation of Settlement dated October 12, 2018 ( Stipulation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BERNARD FIDEL, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and Lead Case No. C-1-00-320 All Others Similarly Situated, (Consolidated with No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION IN RE CONCORD EFS, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) No. 02-2697 Ma Judge Mays NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV RWS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) IN RE: EBIX, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-02400-RWS NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

CAUSE NO

CAUSE NO CAUSE NO. 2002-55406 x DYNEGY INC. and DYNEGY HOLDINGS, INC., IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiffs v. 129 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT BERNARD D. SHAPIRO and PETER STRUB, Individually and On Behalf of Themselves and

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division In re: TVIA INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document relates to: ALL ACTIONS. X :: X :: : : X No. C-06-06304-RMW CLASS ACTION

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. 2:14-cv CBM-E MICHAEL J. ANGLEY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION v. UTI WORLDWIDE INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM and OKLAHOMA LAW ENFORCEMENT RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE ENGINEERING ANIMATION SECURITIES CIVIL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION x In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC. : Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) SECURITIES LITIGATION : : CLASS ACTION

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City: Zip Code:

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Address: City: Zip Code: Must Be Postmarked No Later Than: October 31, 2005 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: OM Group, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator

More information

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2

Case5:09-cv JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13. Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page1 of 13 Exhibit A-2 Case5:09-cv-02147-JW Document146-3 Filed08/25/11 Page2 of 13 1 SCOTT+SCOTT LLP MARY K. BLASY (211262) 2 WALTER W. NOSS (pro hac

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No.: 3:13-cv-00580-BEN-RBB NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAROLYN LYNN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, ARTHUR F. HELF, H. LAMAR COX, MICHAEL

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TAMMY TAPIA-MATOS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, CAESARSTONE, LTD., YOSEF SHIRAN, AND YAIR AVERBUCH,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES No. 98 C 3450 CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Judge David H. Coar THIS DOCUMENT RELATES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) No. 1:08-cv EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL ) No. 1:08-cv EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL No. 1:08-cv-10551 EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and (Consolidated On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538

Esposito v. American Renal Assocs. Holdings, Inc. et al. Claims Administrator c/o GCG P.O. Box 10538 Must be Postmarked No Later Than July 6, 2018 REA Esposito v American Renal Assocs Holdings, Inc et al Claims Administrator c/o GCG PO Box 10538 *P-REA-POC/1* Dublin, Ohio 43017-4538 (888) 684-5083 wwwarasecuritiessettlementcom

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code

Representative or Custodian Name (if different from Beneficial Owner(s) listed above) City State ZIP Code Rentrak Corporation Shareholders Litigation Website: www.rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@rentrakcorporationshareholderslitigation.com PO Box 4234 Phone: (888)

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE CABLEVISION/RAINBOW MEDIA TRACKING STOCK LITIGATION Cons. C.A. No. 19819-VCN NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: KEYSPAN CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION CV 2001-5852 (ARR) (MDG) NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL PERSONS WHO

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. MODEL N, INC., et al., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS FEE PETITION AND RIGHT TO SHARE IN SETTLEMENT FUND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE GLOBALSTAR SECURITIES LITIGATION 01 Civ. 1748 (PKC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING THEREON, RIGHT TO APPEAR, AND RELATED MATTERS

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, HEARING THEREON, RIGHT TO APPEAR, AND RELATED MATTERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No.:

More information

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois

Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Un i t e d St a t e s Di s t r i c t Co u r t f o r t h e No r t h e r n Di s t r i c t o f Il l inois Eastern Division IN RE CAREER EDUCATION CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 03 C 8884 Honorable

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA In re STRATOSPHERE CORPORATION SECURITIES ) Master File No. LITIGATION ) CV-S-96-00708-PMP-(RLH) ) This Document Relates To: ) CLASS ACTION ) ALL ACTIONS.

More information