BRAZILIAN HIGH-TECH LITIGATION: Law, Business & Policy
|
|
- Geraldine Marsh
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BRAZILIAN HIGH-TECH LITIGATION: Law, Business & Policy Thursday, May 12 Washington, DC Scan to download this presentation or to receive link via
2 Litigating Standard Essential Patents Carlos Aboim Partner at Licks Attorneys B RA ZILIAN HIGH-TECH LITIGATION: Law, Business & Policy The George Washington University Law School
3 Litigating Standard Essential Patents Carlos Aboim, Partner of Licks Attorneys Thursday, May 12 Washington, DC
4 Brazil basic facts Brazil is the 5th largest country in the world (larger than the continental U.S.) Brazil was a Portuguese colony from the year 1500 to The James Monroe s administration of the United States was the first to recognize Brazil's independence, followed by Portugal itself in 1825 Brazil has a population of approx. 209 million people and the world's seventh largest economy by nominal GDP (USD $1,42T in 2015); Internet penetration of 66.4% (2016), with the greatest number of Facebook posts 4
5 Brazil basic facts and, of course Host for the Olympic games in 85 days! (we will not mention World Cup at this time...) 5
6 Brazilian Market - Telecommunications in Brazil 3G available to 95.8% of the population 6
7 Brazilian Market - Telecommunications in Brazil 4G available to 55.1% of the population 7
8 Brazil basic facts But 3G is really 1G, as operators are obliged to offer only 30% of the contracted speed 30% of transactions occur using slips that are paid at a local corner store or ATM 8
9 Brazil basic facts Why Brazil? The answer is simple. Brazil is equal to the rest of the South American market combined. If you can win Brazil, you will have an easier time winning other South American markets. Those who can bring both relevant sector expertise and a deep understanding of the local environment will be positioned for big wins. (Brazil Startup Report - accessed on July 20 th, 2015). 9
10 Introductory analysis on essential facilities doctrine and enforcement of de facto essential patents in Brazil. General aspects Antitrust liability
11 Enforcement of essential patents and ex parte preliminary Injunctions - Background There is no specific legal provision governing the enforcement of Standard Essential Patents (SEP) or patents that are de facto essential ( essential patents ). Both will be subject to essential facilities liability (i.e. compulsory license) and antitrust liability. Compliance with technical standards is not required by law or regulations. There is no judicial decision establishing a framework for enforcement of SEPs (no stare decisis). There is no limitation for the enforcement of SEPs in Brazil, but the enforcement must be reasonable to prevent essential facilities liability (i.e. compulsory license) and antitrust liability. 11
12 Compulsory license limitations to the exercise of IPR Article 68 of the IP Statute (Statute # 9,279/96) states: The patentee will have its patent compulsorily licensed if he exercises its IPR in an abusively way, or it he uses it to practice an abuse of economic power, proven under the terms of the Law, by an administrative or judicial decision. According to 1 of this article, the patent will also be subject to a compulsory license when the patent subject matter is not explored in the Brazilian territory, or when its commercialization does not meet the market needs. The influence of the local industry and willingness of the government to take action should not be underestimated. 12
13 Enforcement of essential patents in Brazil CADE s decisions Examples of cases regarding the application of the essential facilities doctrine : Companhia Petroquímica do Sul vs. Petroquímica Triunfo 1998: CADE considered that Petroquímica do Sul had reasonable economics reasons to not enter contracts with Petroquímica Triunfo, based solid economic justifications based on the opportunistic behavior of Petroquímica Triunfo in previous contracts. Globo vs. DirecTV 2001: CADE considered that Globo s signal was not essential for the provision of services of cable TV. CADE ruled that DirecTV did not depend on Globo s signal to subsist in the market. Embratel vs Telesp 2002: Telesp was accused of offering competitive advantages to its subsidiary Telefônica, harming Embratel in bids regarding long-distance calls. CADE ruled that there was an antitrust violation, based on the absence of reasonable basis for the difference in prices charged by Telesp from Embratel and Telefônica. 13
14 Enforcement of essential patents in Brazil CADE s decisions Decisions rendered by CADE relating to de facto essential patents : Gradiente and Cemaz vs. Philips (Case # / ) May 13, 2009: The accusation claimed abuse of its dominant position, abusive pricing, denial of access to essential technology, and discrimination of lawful players in the market. In regard to the alleged abuse of dominant position, CADE understood that there was no antitrust violation, since the IP Statute allows the patentee to prevent others from commercializing the patent subject matter without its consent, and that there was no evidence that Philips failed to negotiate a license. Sony Corporation, Philips, Panasonic, Hitachi Consumer Eletronics, Samsung and Cyberlink (Case # / ) June 26, 2011: Pool of essential patents for running and reproduction of Blu-Ray discs, as well as DVD and CD format is Blu-ray devices. CADE understood that the pool brought competitive benefits to the markets involved, that it did not reduce the competition in the final markets, and that it promoted access to essential patents, imposing the non-discriminatory licensing. 14
15 Enforcement of essential patents and ex parte preliminary injunctions
16 Enforcement of essential patents and ex parte preliminary injunctions (Background) There is no specific legal framework for the enforcement of essential patents. But the enforcement must be reasonable, as there is a growing concern about IPRs and antitrust. The enforcement of essential patents is a regular patent infringement lawsuit. The particularities of the enforcement of an essential patent will come to light in the arguments for request of an injunction. Why the preliminary injunctions to protect IPR in Brazil are so important? Injunctive relief is the only adequate remedy. How to perform a reasonable enforcement and also obtain an ex parte preliminary injunction in Brazil? 16
17 Enforcement of essential patents and ex parte preliminary injunctions (General legal requirements) Legal requirements - Art. 300 of the Brazilian Civil Code of Procedure: (i) risk of irreparable harm (ii) likelihood of the plaintiff s claims on the merits Preliminary injunctions can be granted ex parte (that is, before the service of the complaint) Article 209, paragraph 1 st, of the IP Statute: The judge may, so as to avoid irreparable damages or damages that would be difficult to recover, grant an injunctive order to suspend the violation or act that has such in view, before summoning the defendant, upon, if necessary, the deposit of a bond. Liability for the Plaintiff who request a preliminary injunction: Article 302 of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure provides for strict liability for damages caused by the injunction in case the final decision on the merits is unfavorable. 17
18 Ex parte preliminary injunctions Irreparable harm Hardship to obtaining compensation in Brazil for patent infringement: the restitution in integrum should reach, independently from the effective peeve, all the economic advantage achieved by the infringer, due to the illicit and in the case of counterfeit, the indemnity of the loss of profits should be correspondent to the profits obtained by the infringer, that profited from a right that did not belong to him and, therefore, should refund what was obtained, in terms of counterfeit profit (AC /6, Court of Appeals of São Paulo, 2nd Panel of Private Law, reporting judge Cezar Peluso, 04/02/2003). The indemnity for moral damages should be correspondent to the profits obtained by the infringer and to the infringement itself, limited by the principle of reasonability and, on the other hand, should serve as propaedeutic to the infringer. (REsp n , Superior Court of Justice, 3rd Pane, Reporting Judge Massami Uyeda, j. 17/02/2009, DJ 04/08/2009) But in Brazil there are no punitive damages, no treble damages for willful infringement, or any kind of enhanced damages in the statute Evidence of the actual harm is required, otherwise there would be unjust enrichment and, for instance, evidence of loss of market share and loss profits is usually hard to accomplish. 18
19 As a result... In general, Courts often grant preliminary injunctions based on prima facie evidence acknowledging the importance of the injunctive relief as the primary remedy for the protection of IP rights. It is also the main remedy for the ones that can be accused of infringement, as preliminary injunctions on declaratory lawsuits of non-infringement ( inter partes ) and on invalidity lawsuits before federal courts ( erga omnes ) are also available. 19
20 But what additional evidence will enhance the chances of a preliminary injunction in the enforcement of essential patents? (1/2) The defendant s competitors in the market acknowledge the patent and pay royalties (allowing he defendant to keep commercializing would give rise to unfair competition). The defendant isan unwilling licensee. Refusal to initiate good faith negotiations to obtain a license. Preconditions and roadblocks to stall negotiations (affidavits reflecting negotiations and judicial decisions abroad, if available). The defendant has no relevant assets in the Country, making the monetary relief even more inadequate (the level of obsolescence of the technology may also be relevant). 20
21 But what additional evidence will enhance the chances of a preliminary injunction in the enforcement of essential patents? (2/2) Absence of harm to consumers (there will be no shortage of products and the protection the IPR will ensure fair competition and innovation) The defendant is a member of the SSO (in case of a SEP) and is well aware of honest practices regarding licensing, but still refuses to negotiate The patent (in case of a SEP) was submitted as essential to the SSO during the elaboration ofthe standard The defendant (in case of a SEP) refused to submit the setting of a FRAND royalty to a court or to arbitration Evidence about the reputation of the defendant (in support of the argument that monetary damages in the end of the lawsuit will be inadequate) 21
22 Preliminary injunctions Ericsson v. TCL (State Court ) The risk of the delay relies on the fact that the continuity of the manufacture and commercialization of the cell phone devices will bring irreparable harm to the plaintiff, seeing as there is no way of verifying the amount of harm that will be caused to it, given the absense of knowledge about the quantity of cell phones that are available to the consumer, or about to be commercialized, or that are being manufactured in the Appellant s [TCT] factories. "On the contrary, the appealed decision analyzed TCT's arguments, having concluded that there is, indeed, a risk to irreparable harm to Ericsson, especially considering that TCT is a company with headquarters in China, without a branch in Brazil, which would make the execution more difficult. Appeal: with regard to the allegation that the appellee is not entitled to an injunctive relief based on a single patent the protection to intellectual property exists with this goal, i.e. excluding others that are not duly authorized by the patentee the infringement of a single patent does foreclose manufacturing and commercialization of a certain product, as corroborated by judicial decisions. (Interlocutory appeal # ) 22
23 Preliminary injunctions Vringo vs. ZTE (State Court ) "The preliminary injunction, under the terms of article 273 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is an important mechanism to ensure the delivery of a timely and adequate legal protection, if there is an unequivocal evidence and likelihood of the claims, in order to grant protection to the protected good, and abbreviate, even if temporarily, the practical effects of the definitive decision". "the Trial Judge was logical and had good sense, when, aware of the fast technological development of the modern society and of the numerous possibilities regarding the extension of the litigation, she foresaw that the eventual recognition of the sought right, already supported, if delayed, will cause an irreparable harm to the plaintiff's assets". 23
24 Preliminary injunctions rejection of the bond Vringo vs. ZTE (State Court ) Trial Court: Therefore, prudence recommends the rejection of the bond or the deposit of royalties, as ZTE requests, because it would simply mean a temporary and precarious solution to a dilemma that requires a permanent solution as soon as possible. Appeal: In a nutshell, the discussion gravitates around the alleged lack of authorization by the patentee for the manufacturing, importation, use and commercialization of equipment for celular mobile telecommunication, which was developed by the Finnish Nokia, consisting in an operation called relocation......fulfilling such equipment the technical specifications of the international 3GPP standard, which is mandatory for the entire industry". as pointed by the trial judge, it is not possible to grant the posting of a bond in this procedural moment it is indeed not possible to ascertain the damages allegedly suffered by the appellee, with the need for production of technical evidence and analysis of the contracts between the appellant and third parties, particularly carriers. (interlocutory appeal # ) 24
25 Leading case before the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) in Brazil Vringo v. ZTE Decision issued on November 5 th, 2015 by Reporting Justice Paulo Sanseverino: In summary, the appeal is against the grant of an ex parte preliminary injunction, since the evidence was unilaterally presented by the appellee, without prior hearing of the defendant In this sense, in what refers to the arguments brought by the appellant, the appealed decision is not arbitrary or tautological, as it was issued in light of solid evidence, even if unilaterally produced, and grounded on constitutional provisions and specific legislation, in nothing revealing partiality or injustice. On the contrary, the reasoning of the magistrate a quo has logic and common sense, as it considered the fast technological progress experienced by modern society and the several possibilities to extend the dispute, the magistrate foresaw that if the recognition of the right was delayed, it would result in an effective irreparable risk to the Plaintiff. On the other hand, the appellant did not present a sole argument capable of explaining that its technology does not infringe the appellee s patent 25
26 Enforcement of injunctions Measures to enforce the preliminary injunction: Astreintes (daily fines) seeking to compel the infringer to comply with the injunction, usually set between USD 10k and USD 50k Provisional execution of the daily fine in the event of non-compliance Search and seizure Issuance of an official notice to custom authorities to prevent importation of infringing products (ITC like proceeding) Issuance of official notices to carriers informing the injunction Actual picture of the sealing of telecom equipment by court-experts. 26
27 Enforcement of injunctions Ericsson v. TCL (State Court) In light of the defendant s resistance to fulfil the granted injunction, which has been, on the contrary, expanding the commercialization of the device, the request for immediate execution of the daily fines to secure the effectiveness of the judicial order is granted. That being, the defendant must deposit BRL ,00 in fifteen days, in the terms of art. 475-J of the Code of Civil Procedure. Vringo v. ZTE (State Court) Before the indications of failure to comply with the injunction that emanates from the manifestation of Oi [carrier]... I reconsider the decision to grant the claimed measures inspection and sealing of equipment, as suggested by the plaintiff [ ]. 27
28 Affirmative defenses against the enforcement of SEPs in Brazil
29 Possible defenses in patent infringement lawsuits - Patent invalidity lawsuit Must be filed before Federal Courts, as the BRPTO must join the complaint Court-appointed expert s report is an indispensable evidence due to the technical complexity involved in the patent invalidity analysis Nullity may not be applicable to all of the claims, a condition for partial nullity being that the subsisting claims constitute subject matter that is patentable per se article 47 of the IP Statute Nullity of a patent will produce erga omnes effect as from the filing date of the application article 47 of the LPI 29
30 Possible defenses in patent infringement lawsuits - Patent invalidity lawsuit According to article 56, 1, of the Brazilian IP Statute: nullity of a patent may be argued, at any time, as matter for defense. Superior Court of Justice understand that the patent nullity cannot be claimed in the infringement proceedings. Reason for that: patent infringement lawsuits are filed before State Courts, while invalidity lawsuits have to be filed before Federal Court, with the statutory requirement for the participation of the BRPTO (Brazilian PTO). THEREFORE In Brazil the patent enforcement system is dual, divided in patent infringement and patent invalidity. It means that, in a patent infringement proceeding, defendant cannot allege patent invalidity. Possibility of staying the infringement lawsuit: The State Judge can order the stay of the infringement proceedings until the patent invalidity lawsuit is decided. Controversial matter: there are some who understand Judges and scholars that the infringement lawsuit can only be stayed if it was filed after the invalidity lawsuit. 30
31 Affirmative defenses against the enforcement of SEPs ZTE v Vringo and the BRPTO (2015 Federal Court of Appeals) Firstly, although the plaintiff sustains that the defendant refused to negotiate a FRAND license, with reasonable royalty terms, from the analysis of the documents brought to the records, in particular the ones from docket pending before the Fifth Business Court of Rio de Janeiro, it can be verified that there is no proof that the plaintiff had been effectively willing to negotiate such licensing only been doing so, under the terms it considers fair, after the filing of the lawsuit before the State Court. There is also no evidence in the records that Vringo acted in disagreement with the FRAND terms (fair reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms) in any possible negotiation of licensing and payment of royalties. (Case # ) 31
32 Affirmative defenses against the enforcement of SEPs TCL v Ericsson and the BRPTO (2015 Federal Court of Appeals) Federal Prosecutor s Office ( Ministère Public ): It is important to mention that the standardization is important to guarantee interoperability and adequate operation of telecommunication networks, given that the holders of patents, in order to have their technologies incorporated in standards, commit to license them on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (FRAND). ( ) The appeal must be rejected, as it intends to curtail Ericsson s right to sue and its patent rights, which are protected by Article 5, paragraphs XXIX and XXXV, of the Brazilian Federal Constitution. ( ) There isno irreparable harm, asthe attempts to negotiate already took several years. Reporting appellate judge denied the injunction on appeal based on lack of evidence of abuse of the right to use. (Case # ) 32
33 The TCT v. Ericsson antitrust case Worth noting in CADE s decision to close the preliminary investigation against Ericsson: Ericsson is entitled to file lawsuits to enforce patents Ericsson s lawsuits seem reasonable given the long period of unfruitful negotiations and the many licensing agreement entered by Ericsson with other players in the industry CADE recognized the inexistence of an exclusionary anticompetitive practice CADE mentioned that matters involving negotiations of a licensing agreement and patent infringement are generally a matter of Contract and Patent Law, and only exceptionally will concern Competition Law CADE will not intervene in commercial disputes that do not have an overall impact over a relevant market Any harm suffered by TCT results from a reasonable commercial dispute and does not result in effects over the market, and therefore is not an antitrust violation 33
34 Thank you! Carlos Aboim T M
WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING
43 rd World Intellectual Property Congress Seoul, Korea WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING October 21, 2012 John Kim* Admitted to practice in Maryland, the District of Columbia,
More informationPublished by. Yearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement. Vringo, Inc David L Cohen
Published by Yearbook 2016 Building IP value in the 21st century Standard-essential patent monetisation and enforcement Vringo, Inc David L Cohen Vringo, Inc Monetisation and strategy X X Standard-essential
More informationWIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES
ORIGINAL: English DATE: July 2002 E MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SIPO) WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION JAPAN PATENT OFFICE WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
More informationLaw in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND in Europe: Huawei vs ZTE decision
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND in Europe: Huawei vs ZTE decision Hosted by: Overview Why the decision is important What does the Huawei vs ZTE decision say?
More informationNTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Akimichi Tanabe Takuya Asaoka Katsunori Tsunoda Makoto Kijima. 1. Introduction
Essential Patent Rights Exercise Restriction NPE 1. Introduction Recent growth in patent transactions has been accompanied by increasing numbers of patent disputes, especially in the field of information
More informationHuawei v ZTE No More Need To Look At The Orange Book In SEP Disputes
1 Huawei v ZTE No More Need To Look At The Orange Book In SEP Disputes By James Killick & Stratigoula Sakellariou 1 (White & Case) September 2015 Industry standards are crucial for economic development
More informationBelgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels
Lydian By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights in
More informationStrategic patent prosecution in Brazil Judicial review of the Brazilian PTO decisions
Strategic patent prosecution in Brazil Judicial review of the Brazilian PTO decisions Overcoming delays, the backlog and rejections before Brazilian Federal Courts Current as of December, 2016 SUMMARY
More informationDamages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective
Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective Elaine B. Gin Attorney - Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement US Patent & Trademark Office Every right has a remedy
More informationAIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October Licenses in European Patent Litigation
AIPLA Annual Meeting, Washington DC 23 October 2014 Licenses in European Patent Litigation Dr Jochen Bühling, Attorney-at-law/Partner, Krieger Mes & Graf v. Groeben Olivier Nicolle, French and European
More informationLEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER. No. 5 September, 2011
LEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER No. 5 September, 2011 We are pleased to provide you with the new issue of our legal information newsletter. Topical legal questions are discussed and those related to issues
More informationPatent Strategy in Latin America: Enforcement in Latin America. Speaker: Ms. Clara Pombo, LL.M Attorney-at-law Corporate Director, IP Strategy
Patent Strategy in Latin America: Enforcement in Latin America Speaker: Ms. Clara Pombo, LL.M Attorney-at-law Corporate Director, IP Strategy 2 01 Patent Enforcement Index Latin America 02 General Trends
More informationInternational Trade Daily Bulletin
International Trade Daily Bulletin VOL. 14, NO. 187 SEPTEMBER 26, 2014 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY This BNA Insights article by Hitomi Iwase, Tony Andriotis & Paul Dimitriadis examines the recent U.S. legal
More informationPatent Litigation in Taiwan: overview
Patent Litigation in Taiwan: overview Resource type: Country Q&A Status: Law stated as at 01-Jan-2016 Jurisdiction: Taiwan A Q&A guide to patent litigation in Taiwan. The Q&A gives a high level overview
More informationAugust 6, AIPLA Comments on Partial Amendment of Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Antimonopoly Act (Draft)
Person in Charge of the Partial Amendment of the IP Guidelines (Draft) Consultation and Guidance Office, Trade Practices Division Economic Affairs Bureau, Secretariat, Japan Fair Trade Commission Section
More informationFordham Intellectual Property Law Institute. Wolfgang von Meibom
Fordham Intellectual Property Law Institute Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law and Policy on March 27-28, 2008 Wolfgang von Meibom European Case Law on FRAND Defence in Patent Infringement
More informationIP ENFORCEMENT. IP Leaders in Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries. Igor Simões
IP ENFORCEMENT Igor Simões IP Leaders in Spanish and Portuguese speaing countries Clare, Modet & Cº 2006 Líderes en Propiedad Industrial e Intelectual en países de habla Hispana y Portuguesa 2012 Clare,
More informationIP system and latest developments in China. Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 2015
IP system and latest developments in China Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 205 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated
More informationFRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents
FRAND or Foe: Litigating Standard Essential Patents Munich Seminar May 2013 Munich, Germany Christopher Dillon (Dillon@fr.com) Jan Malte Schley (Schley@fr.com) Brian Wells (wells@fr.com) Presentation Overview
More informationUNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. THIRD PARTY UNITED STATES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION S STATEMENT ON THE PUBLIC INTEREST
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. In the Matter of CERTAIN GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT CONSOLES, RELATED SOFTWARE, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF Inv. No. 337-TA-752 THIRD PARTY UNITED
More informationRemedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General
VI. Remedies: Injunction and Damages 1. General If infringement is found and validity of the patent is not denied by the court, then the patentee is entitled to the remedies of both injunction and damages
More informationA D A M S & A D A M S B R I C S I P F O R U M
A D A M S & A D A M S B R I C S I P F O R U M 2 0 1 6 VLADIMIR BIRIULIN GORODISSKY & PARTNERS, Partner Head of Legal Practice BRICS IP Forum - 2016 London November 21, 2016 Vladimir Biriulin Partner DISPOSAL
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2015 (1) Carte Blanche for SSOs? The Antitrust Division s Business Review Letter on the IEEE s Patent Policy Update Stuart M. Chemtob Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.
Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3
More informationInjunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents
Litigation Webinar Series: INSIGHTS Our take on litigation and trial developments across the U.S. Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patents David Healey Sr. Principal, Fish & Richardson Houston,
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More information: 1 : Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100. Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 7
OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Roll No : 1 : NEW SYLLABUS Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100 Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 7 NOTE : Answer ALL Questions. 1. Read the case
More informationRecent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea
Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea AIPPI Forum 2007 Session I October 5, 2007 Raffles City Convention Center, Singapore Casey Kook-Chan An Statutory Regime for IP Protection AIPPI-KOREA Statutory
More informationLAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES Attorney Michael J. Persson (Mike) is a Registered Patent Attorney and practices primarily in the field of intellectual property law and litigation. The following materials
More informationCase 2:10-cv GW-PLA Document 89 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:455
Case :0-cv-0-GW-PLA Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :0-cv-0-GW-PLA Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Olympic Developments AG, LLC ( Plaintiff
More informationOverview of Developments in Telecoms Patent Litigation
Fordham IP Conference April 2012 Overview of Developments in Telecoms Patent Litigation Ari Laakkonen Powell Gilbert LLP Health Warning: My comments reflect my personal opinions. 1992 Analogue phones were
More informationGermany. Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs. McDermott Will & Emery
GERMANY Germany Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs Patent Enforcement Proceedings 1 Lawsuits and courts What legal or administrative proceedings are available for enforcing patent rights against an infringer?
More informationFederal Circuit Provides Guidance on Methodologies for Calculating FRAND Royalty Rates, Vacating the Jury Award in Ericsson v.
In this Issue: WRITTEN BY COURTNEY J. ARMOUR AND KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN EDITED BY KOREN W. WONG-ERVIN The views expressed in this e-bulletin are the views of the authors alone. DECEMBER 1-6, 2014 Federal
More information9 The Enforcement of Patent Rights in Japan (*)
9 The Enforcement of Patent Rights in Japan (*) Invited Researcher: Christoph Rademacher (**) A patent confers on its holder (the patentee) the privilege to exclude a non-authorized party from using the
More informationStandard Essential Patent License under the FRAND Commitment
Standard Essential Patent License under the FRAND Commitment Steve Wang Inc. September 8, 2017 1 A General Review of the FRAND Commitment The origin of the FRAND obligation lies in the IPR policy documents
More informationAPLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions
APLI Antitrust & Licensing Issues Panel: SEP Injunctions Robert D. Fram Covington & Burling LLP Advanced Patent Law Institute Palo Alto, California December 11, 2015 1 Disclaimer The views set forth on
More informationNine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations?
Nine years after Ebay Should German courts have discretion when deciding on injunctions in patent infringement litigations? 21 th Annual Conference on Intellectual Property Law & Policy at Fordham IP Law
More informationENFORCEMENT: WHEN AND WHERE TO ACT? FICPI 16 TH OPEN FORUM. Natalia Stepanova Partner Gorodissky & Partners Ltd.
FICPI 16 TH OPEN FORUM St. Petersburg, Russia 5-8 October 2016 ENFORCEMENT: WHEN AND WHERE TO ACT? Natalia Stepanova Partner Gorodissky & Partners Ltd. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF COURT SYSTEM IN RUSSIA 2 Second
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Patents in Japanese Courts
Enforcement of Foreign Patents in Japanese Courts July 22, 2006 Maki YAMADA Judge, Tokyo District Court 1 About Us: IP Cases in Japan Number of IP cases filed to the courts keeps high. Expediting of IP
More informationCROSS-BORDER PATENT DISPUTES: UPC OR ARBITRATION
CROSS-BORDER PATENT DISPUTES: UPC OR ARBITRATION APPLE VS SAMSUNG ANA GEORGINA ALBA BETANCOURT QUEEN MARY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON OUTLINE 1. Overview of the Apple vs Samsung Patent case 2. Overview of the
More informationNorway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS
Norway By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights in your jurisdiction? Cases
More informationPatent Enforcement in India
Patent Enforcement in India Intellectual property assets are touted as the cornerstone of competitiveness in international trade and are the driving factors behind socio-economic development in India.
More informationInnovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions
Innovation Act (H.R. 9) and PATENT Act (S. 1137): A Comparison of Key Provisions TOPIC Innovation Act H.R. 9 PATENT Act S. 1137 Post Grant Review ( PGR ) Proceedings Claim Construction: Each patent claim
More informationSEPs & FRAND after Huawei/ZTE Report from the Venice Judges Forum:
SEPs & FRAND after Huawei/ZTE Report from the Venice Judges Forum: Mark van Gardingen Brussels (EPLAW), 24 November 2017 SEP s & FRAND panel in Venice Moderator: - Rian Kalden, Court of Appeal Judge (NL)
More informationPatents in Europe 2011/2012. Greece Lappa
Patents in Europe 2011/2012 Lappa By Eleni Lappa, Drakopoulos Law Firm, Athens 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights
More informationA Rational Thinking on the Refusal to License Intellectual Property under China s Antitrust Legal Framework. Dr. Zhan Hao & Ms.
A Rational Thinking on the Refusal to License Intellectual Property under China s Antitrust Legal Framework Dr. Zhan Hao & Ms. Song Ying 1. Introduction This article will address the perplexing issue of
More informationChapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights
Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights Abstract Not only is it important for startups to obtain intellectual property rights, but they must also actively monitor for infringement
More informationDate May 16, 2014 Court Intellectual Property High Court, Case number 2013 (Ne) 10043
Date May 16, 2014 Court Intellectual Property High Court, Case number 2013 (Ne) 10043 Special Division A case in which the court found that the appellee's products fall within the technical scope of the
More informationJapan Japon Japan. Report Q174. in the name of the Japanese Group
Japan Japon Japan Report Q174 in the name of the Japanese Group Jurisdiction and applicable law in the case of cross-border infringement (infringing acts) of intellectual property rights I. The state of
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1, v. Plaintiff, TCL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LIMITED, a Chinese Corporation, TCT MOBILE LIMITED, a Hong
More informationCourt Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation
WRITTEN BY SHYLAH R. ALFONSO AND LOGAN BREED JUNE 30 -JULY 6, 2014 PATENTS Court Approves 24.3 Million in Attorneys' Fees in Pay-For- Delay Litigation On June 30, a federal judge in Tennessee issued an
More informationDAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018
7:30 8:30 Breakfast & Registration 8:30 8:45 Welcome and Introductions (Cooper, Rea, Weinlein) 8:45 10:00 [Panel 1 (or Keynotes)] Legislative And Administrative Efforts To Make United States Patent Protection
More informationPatent Prosecution and Enforcement in Brazil
Patent Prosecution and Enforcement in Brazil Rana Gosain Senior Partner, Daniel Advogados. Brazilian Attorney and Registered IP Agent. Member of Brazilian Association of Intellectual Property. Member of
More informationAIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse Antitrust Guidelines
October 14, 2015 2015 10 14 Mr. Liu Jian Price Supervision and Anti-Monopoly Bureau National Development and Reform Commission People s Republic of China Re: AIPLA Comments on Questionnaire on IP Misuse
More information... Revision,
Revision Table of Contents Table of Contents K Table of Contents Abbreviations... XXIII Introduction... XXVII Part 1: Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Chapter 1: Patents and Utility Models...
More informationPreliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes:
1 Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes: Is It Possible To Put The Toothpaste Back In The Tube? Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome
More informationENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Provisional Measures or Preliminary Evidence
DDr r... Mi iikkl llóóss SSóóvváár ri ii DDAANNUUBBI IIAA PPaat teennt t && LLaaw Offi iiccee ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Provisional Measures or Preliminary Evidence Obtaining Information
More informationAntitrust IP Competition Perspectives
Antitrust IP Competition Perspectives Dr. Dina Kallay Counsel for IP and Int l Antitrust Federal Trade Commission The 6 th Annual Session of the UNECE Team of I.P. Specialists June 21, 2012 The views expressed
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 19 March /08 PI 14
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 19 March 2008 7728/08 PI 14 WORKING DOCUMT from: Presidency to: Working Party on Intellectual Property (Patents) No. prev. doc. : 7001/08 PI 10 Subject : European
More informationTHE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW
THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW Effective from May 1, 2014 CHINA TRADEMARK LAW Effective from May 1 st, 2014 Adopted at the 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People
More informationTECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC
TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC www.tblawadvisors.com Fall 2011 Business Implications of the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)
More informationINVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS IN JAPAN. July 25,2014 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual Property High Court
INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS IN JAPAN July 25,2014 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual Property High Court INVALIDATION TRIAL AT JPO Article 123of the Patent Act (2) Any person
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS. Antonella Carminatti INTRODUCTION
DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS Antonella Carminatti INTRODUCTION In 1809, Brazil became the fourth country in the world after England, the United States, and France to have a patent law. Brazilian
More informationDemystifying India s Patent Regime
Demystifying India s Patent Regime Pankaj Soni October 30, 2014 www.remfry.com 1 AGENDA A Snapshot of India s Enforcement System Recent Decisions Impacting Patent Prosecution Proof of Right Section 8 Reporting
More informationWhen negotiating a cross-border contract, e.g. a
Resolution Of Transatlantic IP And Commercial Disputes Between Brazil And Europe By Carlos Aboim, Ulrich Lohmann and Eduardo Roncolatto 1 When negotiating a cross-border contract, e.g. a patent license
More informationIP PROTECTION IN LATIN AMERICA BRAZIL
IP PROTECTION IN LATIN AMERICA BRAZIL Joaquim Eugenio Goulart May 23rd, 2013 Brazil Highlights South America's leading economy and regional leader; Vast natural resources and consumer market; Well-developed
More informationThe Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation
The Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation Presented by the IP Litigation Group of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP October 2007 Background on Simpson Thacher Founded 1884 in New York City Now, over 750
More informationAmerica Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings
America Invents Act (AIA) Post-Grant Proceedings Various Post-Grant Proceedings under AIA Ex parte reexamination Modified by AIA Sec. 6(h)(2) Continue to be available under AIA Inter partes reexamination
More informationCase5:12-cv RMW Document41 Filed10/10/12 Page1 of 10
Case:-cv-0-RMW Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 E-FILED on 0/0/ 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff,
More informationDetailed Table of Contents
Detailed Table of Contents Board of Editors... v v Foreword... vii vii Preface... ix ix Author Biographies... xi xi Summary Table of Contents... xix xix Chapter 1: PART I: INTRODUCTION The Origins of Trademark
More information7 Problems Surrounding Intellectual Property Rights under Private International Law
7 Problems Surrounding Intellectual Property Rights under Private International Law Despite the prospected increase in intellectual property (IP) disputes beyond national borders, there are no established
More informationPatents and Standards The American Picture. Judge Randall R. Rader U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Patents and Standards The American Picture Judge Randall R. Rader U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Roadmap Introduction Cases Conclusions Questions An Economist s View Terminologies: patent
More informationLaw in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents Hosted by: Methodological Overview of FRAND Rate Determination
More informationPROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME UPDATES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: LAWS AND PRACTICES MODULE 3- ELECTIVE PAPER 9.4
PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME UPDATES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: LAWS AND PRACTICES (Relevant for students appearing in December, 2018 examination) MODULE 3- ELECTIVE PAPER 9.4 Disclaimer: This document
More informationIP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability David W. Hill Partner October 11, 2012 1 U.S. is the most IP-litigious Nation 10 Most Litigious
More informationIP ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA
IP ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA -STRATEGY AND PRACTICAL TIPS Yalei Sun Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP January 28, 2016 Proposed 4 th Amendment to Chinese Patent Law within 30 years 2 Outstanding Problems of Patent
More informationWhen is a ruling truly final?
When is a ruling truly final? When is a ruling truly final? Ryan B. McCrum at Jones Day considers the Fresenius v Baxter ruling and its potential impact on patent litigation in the US. In a case that could
More informationReasonable Royalties After EBay
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Reasonable Royalties After EBay Monday, Sep
More informationNo.44. Special Issue. First Instance Judgment on the Patent Infringement Dispute Between IWNCOMM and Sony China. I. Summary of the Case
No.44 Special Issue Case Express First instance judgment on the patent infringement dispute between IWNCOMM and Sony China First Instance Judgment on the Patent Infringement Dispute Between IWNCOMM and
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 12-1352 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NOKIA INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court
More informationCanada Intellectual property enforcement
Sponsored by Statistical data supplied by Canada Intellectual property enforcement This article first appeared in IP Value 2004, Building and enforcing intellectual property value, An international guide
More informationAIPPI Special Committee on Patents and Standards (Q222)
0 AIPPI Special Committee on Patents and Standards (Q222) Report Work Plan Item #5 Availability of injunctive relief for FRAND-committed standard essential patents, incl. FRAND-defence in patent infringement
More informationSHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTS IN BRAZIL. Alberto de Orleans e Bragança Veirano Advogados
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENTS IN BRAZIL Alberto de Orleans e Bragança Veirano Advogados May, 2017 1 I. INTRODUCTION. The recent historical evolution of M&A transactions in Brazil has had a relevant impact
More informationPrathiba M. Singh President, APAA (Indian Group)
Prathiba M. Singh President, APAA (Indian Group) Section 108 relates to relief in a suit for infringement Section 108(1) provides for Damages or Account of Profits At the option of the Plaintiff Section
More informationJ2s\~",~ov<j", Through. versus. & ORS. ... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER %
* $~34 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 123012015 MULTI SCREEN MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED... Plaintiff Through Mr.Abhishek Malhotra and Mr. Debashish Mukherjee, Advocates. versus WWW.VlMEO.COM
More informationInfringement Assertions In The New World Order
Infringement Assertions In The New World Order IP Law360, October 17, 2007, Guest Column Author(s): Charles R. Macedo, Michael J. Kasdan Wednesday, Oct 17, 2007 The recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit
More informationConsiderations on IP Law Enforcement in Europe
M I C H A L S K I H Ü T T E R M A N N & P A R T N E R Considerations on IP Law Enforcement in Europe Dr. Dirk Schulz European Patents - Not a single patent for EPC or EC - Common examination at EPO for
More informationPatents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy
In association with Greece Maria Athanassiadou and Henning Voelkel Dr Helen G Papaconstantinou and Partners Patents in Europe 2016/2017 Helping business compete in the global economy Dr Helen G Papaconstantinou
More informationGermany. Stefan Abel and Pascal Böhner. Bardehle Pagenberg
Stefan Abel and Pascal Böhner Overview 1 Are there any restrictions on the establishment of a business entity by a foreign licensor or a joint venture involving a foreign licensor and are there any restrictions
More informationPATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF THE DTS TECHNOLOGY IN THE MANUFACTURE OF DVD-VIDEO PLAYERS
PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF THE DTS TECHNOLOGY IN THE MANUFACTURE OF DVD-VIDEO PLAYERS This Agreement is entered into this day of, 2004 by and between KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.,
More informationPatents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction
Patents, Standards and Antitrust: An Introduction Mark H. Webbink Senior Lecturing Fellow Duke University School of Law Nature of standards, standards setting organizations, and their intellectual property
More informationIntellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai. OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018
Intellectual Property Enforcement Ali S. Razai OCPA Annual Educational Conference September 15, 2018 Benefits Of Litigation Preliminary Relief Damages Disgorgement of infringer s profits Lost profits Convoyed
More informationPOST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER
POST GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN THE PTO STEPHEN G. KUNIN PARTNER PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (PTAB) COMPOSITION DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS APJ 2 PATENT
More informationDecree No. 105/2006/ND-CP Providing Detailed Regulations and
Vietnam Tilleke & Gibbins Thomas J. Treutler & Anh Mai Duong 1. Sources of Law 1.1 What are the principal sources of law and regulation relating to patents and patent litigation? (Briefly describe the
More informationJuly 12, NPE Patent Litigation. The AIA s Impact on. Chris Marchese. Mike Amon
The AIA s Impact on NPE Patent Litigation Chris Marchese Mike Amon July 12, 2012 What is an NPE? Non Practicing Entity (aka patent troll ) Entity that does not make products Thus does not practice its
More informationafter hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 20 November 2014, gives the following Judgment 1 This request for a preliminary ru
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 July 2015 (*) (Competition Article 102 TFEU Undertaking holding a patent essential to a standard which has given a commitment, to the standardisation body, to grant
More informationPakistan. Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates. Author Zulfiqar Khan. World Trade Organisation Agreement and the Paris Convention.
Pakistan Contributing firm Khursheed Khan & Associates Author Zulfiqar Khan Legal framework In Pakistan, trademark protection is governed by the Trademarks Ordinance 2001 and the Trademarks Rules 2004.
More informationA Review of Korean Competition Law and Guidelines for Exercise of Standardrelated
Journal of Korean Law Vol. 15, 117-155, December 2015 A Review of Korean Competition Law and Guidelines for Exercise of Standardrelated Patents* Dae-Sik Hong** Abstract The purpose and main scope of this
More informationSUPER AUDIO CD INFORMATION AGREEMENT. This Agreement is entered into this day of, 2014 ( the Effective Date ) by and between
SUPER AUDIO CD INFORMATION AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into this day of, 2014 ( the Effective Date ) by and between KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., having its registered office in Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
More informationAntitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal
Competition Policy International Antitrust Regulation of IPRs China s First Proposal Adrian Emch (Hogan Lovells) & Liyang Hou (KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University) 1 1 Introduction On June
More information