IP system and latest developments in China. Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 2015
|
|
- Prudence Washington
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3 IP system and latest developments in China Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd. June, 205
4 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 3. Special point: Utility model patents in China 4. Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China
5 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 3. Special point: Utility model patents in China 4. Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China
6 Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework. Court structure 2. Actions available for patent & trademark disputes 3. Overview of litigation cases in China 4. Jurisdiction issue 5. Evidentiary issue (how to prove)
7 The Chinese Court System Court court system Supreme Court Special courts including military courts, maritime courts and railway courts 3 High Courts Over 350 Intermediate Courts Over 3000 Basic Courts 205/6/7 *more courts with jurisdiction over TM infringement litigation cases than patent infringement litigation cases
8 Layout of the courts with jurisdiction of the patent infringement cases
9 possible. The Chinese Litigation System Courts Bifurcated system; Two-instance trial system; No jury; panel of 3 or 5 judges (in first instance, may include one(or two) lay persons named as people s juror); Technical expert likely to get involved; in IP courts, Technical Researcher system (Technical Investigation Officer) is introduced; three specialized IP courts newly established in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou; additionally over 0 courts with jurisdiction over patent infringement cases, which have special IP tribunals; Forum Shopping
10 AIC action for TM Actions other than court proceeding Local IP Office action for patent. Applicable for patent (invention, utility model and design) 2. Prima facie infringement evidence is sufficient to start the action 3. No damage. Applicable for TM infringement 2. Quick 3. Prima facie infringement evidence is sufficient to start the action 4. Powerful investigation 5. No damage border measures- Customs Action for both patent and TM. Applicable for import/export of infringing products 2. benecial to record IPR at customs 3. seizure of goods (ex-officio or upon requested)
11 Overview
12 Why so many litigation in China? Large Market (.4 billion people) Huge number of valid patent (over 3.8 million patents including over.8 million invention patents by Nov 204) Quick: st instance, normally within one year; 2nd instance, even quicker stronger weight in negotiation inexpensive: first instance, attorney fee normally US$ 30, ,000
13 Any disavantages to litigate in China? difficult to collect evidence-no Discovery the formality requirement of evidence is very high and strict low damage difficult to enforce the decision sometimes
14 The amount of patent infringement litigation first instance decisions Sanyou collected in 200 and all foreign plaintiff
15 Development of Beijing IP Court Nov. 6, 204 Mar. 20, 205 Docketed cases: 2400 First Instance: Copyright: 55; TM:463, Patent: 505, Others: 35; Second Instance: Copyright 259, TM: 3, Patent: 3, Others: 49.
16 Development of Beijing IP Court Nov. 6, 204 Mar. 20, 205 Finished cases: 587 First Instance: 346; Second Instance: 24 Estimated numbers of cases: 0,000 /year Estimated average workload: 220 cases / judge / year
17 Jurisdiction Jurisdiction by court Level Venue jurisdiction Designation jurisdiction
18 Patent Infringement Litigation Where to sue (place and court) Level of court General Rule: a patent infringement litigation shall start from an intermediate-level court or a higher level court Example : Oerlikon v. Savior, Starting from Beijing 2 nd intermediate-level court Example 2: Eli Lilly v. Jiangsu Haosen (2009) Civil third final No. 6 First instance: Jiangsu high-level court Second instance: the Supreme court
19 Where to sue (place and court) Exceptions Basic courts: Such as Haidian basic court has the power to hear partial cases relating to patent disputes (including patent infringement) The case shall relate to utility model or design patent; and Damage as claimed shall be less than 5 million, or Damage as claimed shall be less than 0 million and both parties are located in Beijing.
20 Where to sue (place and court) Venue Basic rules: the defendant place or infringing place. Infringing place covers: the places of making, using, offering for sale, selling, importing the accused infringing products, the places of using the patented process, the places of using, offering for sale, selling or importing the products directly obtained from the patented method. If only sue against the manufacturer, without the seller, and the manufacturer is located different from the seller, the court at the manufacturer s place has the jurisdiction. To sue both (the manufacturer + the seller), the court at the place where the accused products are sold has the jurisdiction.
21 Remarks Whether the court will consider substantial matter in determining the procedural matter of jurisdiction issue? Case study: First defendant: offer for sale online and by brochure; Second defendant: manufactured for the first defendant; Third defendant: mentioned in the brochure of the first defendant as customer. Plaintiff sued in the place of the first defendant. Third defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the court and argued: Not a customer of the first defendant; No jurisdiction by this court on third defendant Court: whether a customer is a substantial matter to be examined during litigation, not considered in this procedural matter of jurisdiction issue.
22 Jurisdiction issue relating to sales online Case study: Remarks. Server of the website is located in Beijing; 2. Place of manufacture: Zhejiang; 3. Lawyer of plaintiff ordered online and received the product in Suzhou. 4. Where could the plaintiff sue? Beijing? Zhejiang? Or Suzhou? 5. Court: the place of receiving accused products is considered as infringing place.
23 Proving your case basic rule: who claims, who proves! --formality requirement strict: evidence formed out of China required notarization and legalization; foreign language required to be translated into Chinese --documentary evidence and physical objects weigh more than witness statement; however, experts' opinions invited by the court are normally well respected Evidence Preservation Procedure available evidence preservation request may be submitted with the court with the conditions that:. the evidence may possibly disappear; or 2. it may be difficult to collect the evidence later on
24 Legal Basis Article 8 of Civil Procedural law During litigation, if there is a likelihood that the evidence may be destroyed, lost or difficult to be obtained later, the party may apply for evidence preservation; Before lawsuit, in case of emergencies in which the evidence may be lost or difficult to be obtained afterwards, the interested party may apply before the court in the place where the evidence is located or the person applied has his domicile or the court has the jurisdiction over the case.
25 Legal Basis Rules for evidence preservation for IP lawsuits by local courts Shanghai High Court: Rules for evidence preservation for IP lawsuits Beijing High Court: Rules for evidence preservation for IP lawsuits Zhejiang High Court: Rules for evidence preservation for IP lawsuits Shenzhen Intermediate Court: Rules for evidence preservation for IP lawsuits
26 Application of evidence preservation In 203, 73 applications for pre-trial preservation of evidence were received, and 97.63% were granted approval, which have reduced the burden of proof on the parties concerned. Intellectual Property Protection by Chinese Courts in 203 Example case: Microsoft vs. e-future Information Technology Inc., before Wuhan Intermediate People s Court e-future was alleged to have infringed upon Microsoft s Microsoft Office series of software, Microsoft had applied for pre-trial preservation of evidence and its application approved.
27 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 3. Special point: Utility model patents in China 4. Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China
28 Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation. bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 2. Stay issue 3. Invalidation of the patent vs. Enforcement of court decision finding infringement
29
30 Invalidation and litigation. Bifurcated procedures infringement before court; invalidation before Patent Reexamination Board 2. Invalidation procedure: any individual or entity (including the patentee) could raise invalidation request against a granted (even terminated) patent all invalidation cases are inter-parties no US-style estoppel
31 Number of invalidation cases from 20 to Design UM Invention Total
32 Invalidation and litigation 3. Comprehensive consideration on stay issue based on following factors: the type of the patent; the stay petition filed within the answer period (5/30 days)? the search report for Utility Model or Design patent? grounds and evidences for the invalidation, likely? 4. Effect of invalidation of the patent in question whether an effective decision finding infringement had been enforced? if not, then no infringement; if enforced, then as is, no return of damage
33 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 3. Special point: Utility model patents in China 4. Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China
34 Special point: Utility model patents in China. Introduction on and current situation of China Utility Model (UM) Patents 2. Issues related to China Utility Model Patents 3. Suggestions
35 Introduction Definition Utility model means a new technical solutions proposed for the shape and structure of a product, or the combination thereof, which are fit for practical use. Patentable subject matter ) product with shape and structure product without shape and structure is non-patentable under UM patent, such as a compound. 2) no method Prosecution procedure preliminary examination only; Patent term 0 years from filing date
36 Utility Model
37 Patentable subject matter Examinatio n procedures Prosecution period Invention Utility Model Design Product & method Product (shape + structure) Preliminary examination & Substantive examination Preliminary examination only (substantial requirements + possible novelty examination) 3-5 years Within year (about 6-0 months) Product (Design) Preliminary examination Within year (about 3-6 months) Cost Expensive Inexpensive Inexpensive Patent Term 20 years 0 years 0 years
38 Factors to be considered for UM patent If the object could be protected by UM? Is it a product? Does the improvement relate to its structure or construction? Life time of the product If the life time of the products in the marketplace is less than 0 years, UM may be considered. How easy/quick could it be copied once it is launched in the market? If it could be copied easily/quickly, the applicant may consider filing a UM to get granted a patent right quickly. The inventiveness of the improvement In case the inventiveness is not high, UM can be considered.
39 Disadvantages of a UM No substantive examination, no procedure for amending claims against the prior arts; --Once granted, for invention and UM patents, it is not allowed to amend the claims according to the specification or drawings. Instead, the patentee may only delete claims/solutions or combine claims. * Suggestions:before filing, in-depth search on prior arts should be conducted. Proper claims shall be drafted based on the prior arts. A patentability evaluation report will be required if patent infringement litigation is lodged based on the UM. * It may take 2-3 months to obtain the patentability evaluation report. When requesting for stay the infringement case to wait for the invalidation result, UM patent is in a weak position compared to invention patent.
40 Advantages of a UM The examination criteria for UM is kind of lower than that for invention No significant difference between damage awarded in patent infringement litigation regarding invention patent and regarding UM patent; Four methods to determine damage as stipulated by Art.65 of patent law: According to the actual loss of the patentee;; According to the profit gained by the infringer; According to the times of reasonable royalties; Statutory: varying from0,000 to one million (CNY). There is only slight difference on statutory compensation for UM and Invention.
41 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Huge amount of UM A significant amount of UM are owned by NPE or individuals Less effective for corporates to fight against individual or NPE patentees with patent pool Threats cannot be ignored, though the quality of UM patents varies dramatically
42 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Huge amount of UM UM applications received by SIPO April 985-December 200 source UM Filed UM cases percentage Subtotal 2,44, % Total Service % Nonservice %
43 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Huge amount of UM Utility Model applications received by SIPO source UM Filed percentage Subtotal 2,28,9 00% Total Service,549, % Nonservice 668, %
44 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Huge amount of UM Source UM applications granted by SIPO April 985-December 200 UM Granted Percentage Sub-total,73, % Total Service % Nonservice %
45 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Huge amount of UM Source Utility Model patents granted by SIPO UM Granted Percentage Sub-total,672,8 00% Total Service,207, % Nonservice 464, %
46 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents A significant amount of UM are owned by individuals April 985-December 200 source UM Classification Filed Percentage Sub-total % Total Service % Non-service % Sub-total /99.3 Domestic Service % Non-service % Sub-total /0.7 Foreign Service % Non-service %
47 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents A significant amount of UM are owned by individuals April 985-December 200 Source UM Classification Granted Percentage Sub-total % Total Service % Non-service % Sub-total /99.2 Domestic Service % Non-service % Sub-total /0.8 Foreign Service % Non-service %
48 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Threats cannot be ignored, though the quality of UM patents varies dramatically Statistics on invalidation cases (invalidation rate) Statistics on litigation cases (win rate) Example cases (Chint v. Schneider) damage
49 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Invalidation Rate Comparison of three types of patents 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% invention UM Design
50 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Validity challenge cases of utility model patents 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% invalidated maintained partially invalidated withdrawn
51 Patentee Win Rates by Patent Type for cases concluded in (win/win+lose) (note: the above data comes from the sample cases we collected for ) 5
52 Patentee Win Rates by Patent Type and Domestic/Foreign Plaintiff, (win/win+lose) (note: the above data comes from the sample cases we collected 52 for )
53 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Example case(chint v. Schneider)-Damage Patent concerned:um patent: ZL Damage decided by first instance:cny334,869,872
54 Issues related to China Utility Model Patents Following difficulties faced by corporates using technologies:. High cost to invalidate; 2. Higher possibility to be sued; 3. Hard to invalidate. Suggestion:establish defensive measures and system early.
55 Suggestions File applications proactively to build a patent pool Defensive publication in way of patent application, online disclosure, etc. Evidence collection for defense (prior use defense) Watch patent filing situation of your main competitors Freedom-to-operate search Patent invalidation preparation and invalidation request
56 A typical case Company A: invented and patented a new product The Patent: the main inventive point is feature a which lies in the panel portion of the product. The Product: structures of the product includes feature a and all other structure not mentioned in the patent Company B: found the product in the market and filed a UM application The UM application: a structure b of the product but not mentioned in the patent of Company A Company B warned A with the UM patent and Company A feels frustrated Earlier patent A did not disclose the structure b; It is difficult to collect evidence to prove the date and the structures of the earlier sold product with concrete evidence.
57 Main Content. Brief introduction of China's legal IP framework 2. Patent System in China: bifurcated system, infringement and invalidation 3. Special point: Utility model patents in China 4. Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China
58 Trademark: how to deal with trademark infringement activity in China. Overview 2. Actions available against trademark infringement Procedure of AIC action Procedure of court action 3. Infringement issue and Defense 4. Damage issue
59 Overview Trademark Registration Applications before CTO Note: OHIM received TM applications in 202.
60 Overview Chinese TM Registration Applications filed in 202
61 Overview Top 0 Foreign countries for TM filing in China in 202 USA Japan Korea UK Germany France Virgin Islands Italy Australia Singapore
62 Overview
63 Overview Overview of AIC Actions against Trademark Infringement Cases Year Number of cases in total Number of cases with complaints Number of foreign related cases Number of foreign related cases with complaints
64 Actions against TM infringement Judicial Procedure: Court Action Administrative Procedure: AIC Action
65 Court Action Where to sue? (Level) General Rule: a trademark infringement litigation starts from an intermediate-level court or a higher level court; With the approval of the Supreme Court, a basic court in larger cities could have jurisdiction for TM infringement lawsuits. Such as: Haidian district court in Beijing, Huangpu district court in Shanghai.
66 Court Action Where to sue? (Venue) Limited forum shopping Forum shopping (courts having jurisdiction) at the infringing place where the infringement occurs, at the storage/seize place where infringing products are stored or seized, and at the defendant's place where the defendant domiciles. Limitation if the action is taken against multiple defendants with different infringing behaviors, the plaintiff could select the court of infringing place of any defendant (not the defendant place); if the action is taken against only one of the defendants, only the court at the infringing place of that defendant or the court of the defendant's place has jurisdiction.
67 Stay issue: Court Action General rule: The stay will not be granted even if the defendant requests to stay the TM infringement litigation based on the ground that the Application of Invalidation against the cited TM has been filed before TRAB. However, if the evidences and grounds for the invalidation are sufficient, the court could support the request and stay the litigation. Midnight TM infringement case, Beijing st Intermediate Court (2003) Civil Ruling No.348 Jingda TM infringement case, Beijing 2 nd Intermediate court (2003) Civil Ruling No.22
68 Court Action What could get for plaintiff? (Remedies available in court decision) Injunction Damage claim Fine Confiscate infringing products, marks and materials; tools and devices for manufacturing infringing products.
69 AIC Action Jurisdiction Procedure Remedy
70 AIC Action Jurisdiction Administration of Industry and Commerce of district level or higher level At the infringer s place or infringing place
71 AIC Action Procedure Step : Filing the complaint before AIC; Step 2: AIC conducts investigation or even a raid action; Step 3: Response/hearing stage, usually there is no hearing unless the party investigated requests a hearing; Step 4: A written decision is issued by AIC.
72 AIC Action Power of AIC Inquiry Review and copy related documents On-site inspection / raid action Seal up or detain
73 AIC Action Remedy Injunction (Cease and Desist order); Fine; Confiscate infringing products and related materials, tools and equipments; Damage claim (mediation only).
74 Infringement issue and Defense Elements of Infringement Without authorization Infringing behavior Likelihood of confusion Similarity of marks Similarity of goods/services
75 Infringement issue and Defense Defense Fair use If a registered trademark contains the generic name, shape or model of the goods in respect of which it is used, or directly indicates the quality, main raw material, function, use, weight, quantity and other features of the goods, or contains a place name, the trademark owner has no right to prohibit others from duly using it. Factor in considering fair use issue Whether it is used as a trademark; The distinctiveness and level of recognition of the trademark; Bad faith of the user; The likelihood of confusing and misleading the related public.
76 Infringement issue and Defense Defense The defendant uses his own registered trademark If the defendant also registered the accused mark as used, based on the judicial interpretation of the supreme court, the plaintiff has no right to sue before removing the registered mark of the defendant. Later registered TM could be used against TM infringement charge with earlier registered TM. It is very very important to oppose other s later filed conflicting TM application before its registration.
77 Damage Issue Method for calculating damages:. Loss of the trademark owner owing to the infringement; 2. Profit of the infringer from the infringing activities; 3. Multiple times of reasonable royalty; 4. Statutory damages within 3 million RMB (around half million USD). The above methods should be applied in order.
78
WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING
43 rd World Intellectual Property Congress Seoul, Korea WORKSHOP 1: IP INFRINGEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL FORUM SHOPPING October 21, 2012 John Kim* Admitted to practice in Maryland, the District of Columbia,
More informationPatent Litigation in China
Patent Litigation in China Outline, Key Considerations and Case Study 中原信達 China Sinda Intellectual Property Dual-Track System Both administrative and judicial actions are available for patent cases. Administrative:
More informationIP ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA
IP ENFORCEMENT IN CHINA -STRATEGY AND PRACTICAL TIPS Yalei Sun Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP January 28, 2016 Proposed 4 th Amendment to Chinese Patent Law within 30 years 2 Outstanding Problems of Patent
More informationSPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOREIGN PLAINTIFFS IN IP LITIGATION IN CHINA
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR FOREIGN PLAINTIFFS IN IP LITIGATION IN CHINA GLOBAL LAW OFFICE www.glo.com.cn MEPH JIA GUI PARTNER THE 4TH ANNUAL US-CHINA IP CONFERENCE: BEST PRACTICES FOR INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY
More informationCHINA IPR NEWS. CHINA IPR NEWS 1. Top 10 Domestic & Foreign Enterprises by Patent Grants in China 2012
www.deqi-iplc.com CHINA IPR NEWS 1. Top 10 Domestic & Foreign Enterprises by Patent Grants in China 2012 1 2. State Council Revises Copyright rules 2 CHINA IPR NEWS 1. Top 10 Domestic & Foreign Enterprises
More informationOver the past two years, we have. A case study in declarations of non-infringement NON- INFRINGEMENT DECLARATIONS
NON- INFRINGEMENT A case study in declarations of non-infringement Fabio Giacopello and Eric Su of HFG recount a recent case that tested non-infringement declarations before the courts, and offer advice
More informationAre Your Chinese Patents At Risk?
October 2004 Are Your Chinese Patents At Risk? Viagra, the anti-impotence drug made by Pfizer, generated about $1.7 billion in worldwide sales last year. Viagra s active ingredient is a substance called
More informationRecent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea
Recent Developments in IP Enforcement in Korea AIPPI Forum 2007 Session I October 5, 2007 Raffles City Convention Center, Singapore Casey Kook-Chan An Statutory Regime for IP Protection AIPPI-KOREA Statutory
More informationRevision Draft of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China (For Deliberation)
Revision Draft of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China (For Deliberation) (Words in bold font are revised portion) Chapter 1: General Provisions Article 1 This law is enacted for the purpose
More informationOn 18 th May 2011, the Plaintiffs applied for provisional injunction orders. and successfully obtained the orders on 3 rd June 2011.
Short-term Patent Section 129 of Patents Ordinance (Cap 514) Litigation Page 2 to Page 3 Register appearance of product as trade mark Page 3 to Page 4 Patent Infringement or Not? (RE: High Court Action,
More informationAlternative Way to Deal with Patent Litigation in China. Christopher Shaowei NTD Intellectual Property Attorneys Prepared for China PI Held in Paris
Alternative Way to Deal with Patent Litigation in China Christopher Shaowei NTD Intellectual Property Attorneys Prepared for China PI Held in Paris Exciting Figures in 2016 404,208: Invention Patents Granted
More information9 The Enforcement of Patent Rights in Japan (*)
9 The Enforcement of Patent Rights in Japan (*) Invited Researcher: Christoph Rademacher (**) A patent confers on its holder (the patentee) the privilege to exclude a non-authorized party from using the
More informationPatent Litigation in Taiwan: overview
Patent Litigation in Taiwan: overview Resource type: Country Q&A Status: Law stated as at 01-Jan-2016 Jurisdiction: Taiwan A Q&A guide to patent litigation in Taiwan. The Q&A gives a high level overview
More informationTHE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW
THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA TRADEMARK LAW Effective from May 1, 2014 CHINA TRADEMARK LAW Effective from May 1 st, 2014 Adopted at the 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People
More informationRemedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General
VI. Remedies: Injunction and Damages 1. General If infringement is found and validity of the patent is not denied by the court, then the patentee is entitled to the remedies of both injunction and damages
More informationpatentees. Patent judgment rules in Japanese legal system In this part, to discuss the patent judgment rules in Japan legal system, we will discuss th
11 Comparative Study on Judgment Rules of Patent Infringement in China and Japan (*) Invited Researcher: ZHANG, Xiaojin (**) The Supreme Court of P.R.C issued the Judicial Interpretation on Several Issues
More informationEuropean Patent Litigation: An overview
European Patent Litigation: An overview Tuesday 28 September 2010 Hogan Lovells in partnership with the Association of Corporate Counsel Europe Your speaker panel Co-Chairs: Marten Bezemer Associate General
More informationCurrent Status and Challenges concerning IP Litigation in China
Current Status and Challenges concerning IP Litigation in China 2013 by Dr. Jiang Zhipei KING & WOOD MALLESONS 1 Current Status of IP Litigation in China 2 1.1 Statistics 3 1.1 Statistics The number of
More informationWIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE IMPORTANCE OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SYSTEM FOR HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES
ORIGINAL: English DATE: July 2002 E MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (SIPO) WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION JAPAN PATENT OFFICE WIPO ASIAN REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM
More informationPart 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights
Part 1 Current Status of Intellectual Property Rights Annual Report 214 Part 1 Chapter 1 Current Status of Applications, Registrations, Examinations, Appeals and Trials in and outside Japan The landscape
More informationProtection of Intellectual Property Rights in China
Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Law Reviews 12-1-1989
More informationBelgium. Belgium. By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels
Lydian By Annick Mottet Haugaard and Christian Dekoninck, Lydian, Brussels 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights in
More informationDecade History and Future Prospects of Intellectual Property High Court Chief Judge of the Intellectual Property High Court Shitara, Ryuichi
Decade History and Future Prospects of Intellectual Property High Court Chief Judge of the Intellectual Property High Court Shitara, Ryuichi I Introduction Since the Intellectual Property High Court (herein
More informationCHINA S SUPREME PEOPLE S COURT HAS CLARIFIED FOUR TYPES OF IP RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE CASES TO BE HEARD BY SPECIAL IP TRIBUNALS
CHINA IP LEGAL WATCH CHINA S SUPREME PEOPLE S COURT HAS CLARIFIED FOUR TYPES OF IP RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE CASES TO BE HEARD BY SPECIAL IP TRIBUNALS JULY 18, 2009 BY BILL H. ZHANG On July 1, 2009, the China
More informationChapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights
Chapter 13 Enforcement and Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights Abstract Not only is it important for startups to obtain intellectual property rights, but they must also actively monitor for infringement
More information4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA
4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA Provisions of the Indian patent law were compared with the relevant provisions of the patent laws in U.S., Europe and
More informationCan I Challenge My Competitor s Patent?
Check out Derek Fahey's new firm's website! CLICK HERE Can I Challenge My Competitor s Patent? Yes, you can challenge a patent or patent publication. Before challenging a patent or patent publication,
More informationPatents in Europe 2011/2012. Greece Lappa
Patents in Europe 2011/2012 Lappa By Eleni Lappa, Drakopoulos Law Firm, Athens 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights
More informationAIPLA S Comments on the Revision of the Trademark Law of the People s Republic of China 商标法修改公开征集意见
to 商标局法律处 ] VIA EMAIL (sbjlaw@saic.gov.cn) Re: AIPLA S Comments on the Revision of the Trademark Law of the People s Republic of China 商标法修改公开征集意见 Dear Sir or Madam: The American Intellectual Property
More informationti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany There is no "European" litigation system.
Wolfgang Festl-Wietek of Viering Jentschura & Partner Speaker 11: 1 LSI Law Seminars International ti Litigating Patents Overseas: Country Specific Considerations Germany by Wolfgang Festl-Wietek Viering,
More informationPlan. 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law. C. Belgian Code of Economic Law
Damages - Belgium Gunther Meyer 2 8 A p r i l 2 0 1 4 B r u s s e l s 4/29/2014 7:53:38 PM Plan 1. Implementation of the Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC) into Belgian law A. Act of 9 May 2007 B. Act
More informationReview of Current Status of Post-Grant Opposition System in Comparison with Invalidation Trial System
Seiwa Patent & Law (IP Information Section) Dated April 29, 2016 Review of Current Status of Post-Grant Opposition System in Comparison with Invalidation Trial System Miyako Saito (patent attorney) and
More informationAttachment: Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law of the People s Republic of China
March 31, 2009 To: Legislative Affairs Office State Council People s Republic of China Hirohiko Usui President Japan Intellectual Property Association Opinions on the Draft Amendment of the Implementing
More informationLEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER. No. 5 September, 2011
LEGAL INFORMATION NEWSLETTER No. 5 September, 2011 We are pleased to provide you with the new issue of our legal information newsletter. Topical legal questions are discussed and those related to issues
More informationWhere to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO
Washington, D.C. Where to Challenge Patents? International Post Grant Practice Strategic Considerations Before the USPTO, EPO, SIPO and JPO Jeffery P. Langer, PhD U.S. Patent Attorney, Partner, Washington,
More informationINVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS IN JAPAN. July 25,2014 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual Property High Court
INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS IN JAPAN July 25,2014 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual Property High Court INVALIDATION TRIAL AT JPO Article 123of the Patent Act (2) Any person
More informationA D A M S & A D A M S B R I C S I P F O R U M
A D A M S & A D A M S B R I C S I P F O R U M 2 0 1 6 VLADIMIR BIRIULIN GORODISSKY & PARTNERS, Partner Head of Legal Practice BRICS IP Forum - 2016 London November 21, 2016 Vladimir Biriulin Partner DISPOSAL
More informationPOST-GRANT AMENDMENT JOHN RICHARDS
23 rd Annual Fordham Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference Cambridge, April 8-9, 2015 POST-GRANT AMENDMENT JOHN RICHARDS The Problem There is a real life problem in that when filing a patent application
More informationDesign Protection in Europe
Design Protection in Europe www.bardehle.com 2 Content 5 1. Requirements for design protection in Europe 5 2. Overlap of design law and other IP rights 6 3. Design law in Germany and international design
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapter 1 General Provisions
CHINA Trademark Law as amended on October 27, 2001 ENTRY INTO FORCE: December 1, 2001 Adopted at the 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People s Congress on 23 August 1982; revised
More informationPatents in Europe 2016/2017. Helping business compete in the global economy
In association with Greece Maria Athanassiadou and Henning Voelkel Dr Helen G Papaconstantinou and Partners Patents in Europe 2016/2017 Helping business compete in the global economy Dr Helen G Papaconstantinou
More information7 Problems Surrounding Intellectual Property Rights under Private International Law
7 Problems Surrounding Intellectual Property Rights under Private International Law Despite the prospected increase in intellectual property (IP) disputes beyond national borders, there are no established
More informationIP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP IP Litigation in USA Costs, Duration and Enforceability David W. Hill Partner October 11, 2012 1 U.S. is the most IP-litigious Nation 10 Most Litigious
More informationENFORCEMENT: WHEN AND WHERE TO ACT? FICPI 16 TH OPEN FORUM. Natalia Stepanova Partner Gorodissky & Partners Ltd.
FICPI 16 TH OPEN FORUM St. Petersburg, Russia 5-8 October 2016 ENFORCEMENT: WHEN AND WHERE TO ACT? Natalia Stepanova Partner Gorodissky & Partners Ltd. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF COURT SYSTEM IN RUSSIA 2 Second
More informationIP Guide DESIGN PATENT APPLICATIONS. Protecting Your Industrial Designs under Chinese Patent Law. Trademark registration
Trademark registration IP Guide DESIGN PATENT APPLICATIONS Protecting Your Industrial Designs under Chinese Patent Law 2007 WANG JING & CO. All rights reserved This publication has been prepared for clients
More informationAPAA Country Report KOREA APAA Council Meeting Penang 2014
APAA Country Report KOREA APAA Council Meeting Penang 2014 1. IP Statistics in Year 2013 1 1.1. Number of applications filed with KIPO in 2013 Year Patents Utility Model Design Trademarks Total 66,940
More informationItaly Orsingher-Avvocati Associati
Orsingher-Avvocati Associati This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Patents in Europe 2008 April 2008 Italy By Matteo Orsingher and Fabrizio Sanna, Orsingher-Avvocati Associati, Milan
More informationContributing firm. Author Henning Hartwig
Germany Contributing firm Author Henning Hartwig Legal framework Design law in Germany consists of the Designs Act, harmonised to a substantial degree with the EU Designs Directive (98/71/EC) and the EU
More informationLitigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit
Litigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit Paul Brown, Partner, London 4 September 2013 What will this talk cover? What factors does a litigant need to consider when litigating patents
More informationKorean Intellectual Property Office
www.kipo.go.kr 2007 Korean Intellectual Property Office INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 2007 INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA 2007 PATENT ACT 1 UTILITY MODEL ACT 127
More informationJuly 12, NPE Patent Litigation. The AIA s Impact on. Chris Marchese. Mike Amon
The AIA s Impact on NPE Patent Litigation Chris Marchese Mike Amon July 12, 2012 What is an NPE? Non Practicing Entity (aka patent troll ) Entity that does not make products Thus does not practice its
More informationRegulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law
Regulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law Regulations for the Implementation of the Trademark Law of the People s Republic of China (Promulgated by Decree No.358 of the State Council of the People
More informationTrademark Law of the People's Republic of China. Decision on Revising the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China adopted at.
Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (Adopted at the 24th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People's Congress on August 23, 1982; amended for the first time in accordance
More informationNTT DOCOMO Technical Journal. Akimichi Tanabe Takuya Asaoka Katsunori Tsunoda Makoto Kijima. 1. Introduction
Essential Patent Rights Exercise Restriction NPE 1. Introduction Recent growth in patent transactions has been accompanied by increasing numbers of patent disputes, especially in the field of information
More informationOUTLINE AND EVALUATION OF THE DOUBLE TRACK SYSTEM IN JAPAN--- INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS AND INVALIDITY TRIALS AT JPO
OUTLINE AND EVALUATION OF THE DOUBLE TRACK SYSTEM IN JAPAN--- INVALIDITY DEFENSE IN PATENT INFRINGEMENT LITIGATIONS AND INVALIDITY TRIALS AT JPO November 18,2016 Chief Judge Ryuichi Shitara Intellectual
More informationDesigns. Germany Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb. A Global Guide
Designs 2015 Henning Hartwig A Global Guide ... IP only. BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. Selected teams of legally and technically qualified professionals
More informationThe American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS. Jurisdiction
The American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS Before a lawsuit can be brought before a court, certain requirements must first be met. These include: Jurisdicti on Venue Standing to Sue Jurisdiction
More informationDamages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective
Damages and Remedies in Civil IP Cases An U.S. Perspective Elaine B. Gin Attorney - Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy and Enforcement US Patent & Trademark Office Every right has a remedy
More informationLAWSON & PERSSON, P.C.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES Attorney Michael J. Persson (Mike) is a Registered Patent Attorney and practices primarily in the field of intellectual property law and litigation. The following materials
More informationThe Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation
The Changing Face of U.S. Patent Litigation Presented by the IP Litigation Group of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP October 2007 Background on Simpson Thacher Founded 1884 in New York City Now, over 750
More informationChina Patent Agent (H.K.) Ltd. Intellectual Property Attorneys
WHAT S NEW? Commissioner of SIPO Visits CPA Introduction of the Third Revision of Chinese Patent Law Commissioner of SIPO Visits CPA Mr. Tian Lipu, commissioner of the State Intellectual Property Office
More informationStrategies to protect a market entry against (provisional) injunctions
Strategies to protect a market entry against (provisional) injunctions Dr. Clemens Tobias Steins, LL.M. German Attorney-at-Law Partner 1 Life Science IP Seminar 2017 Strategies to protect a market entry
More informationQ: Will the plaintiff succeed at trial?
Expert Evidence- Validity of Patent Registration Page 2 to Page 3 Patent Infringement or Not? (RE: High Court Action, no. 1371/2011) Copyright Ownership of Tooling-Physical Ownership of Tooling Page 3
More informationOff the canvas. Data reveals that although the US brokered patent market may be down, it is not out
Issue 81 January/February 2017 Laura Quatela, Lenovo s new chief legal officer, talks IP How TSMC creates corporate value from its trade secret strategy What users think of quality at the EPO and the USPTO
More informationPatent Litigation With Non-Practicing Entities: Strategies, Trends and
Patent Litigation With Non-Practicing Entities: Strategies, Trends and Techniques ALFRED R. FABRICANT 20 th Annual Fordham Intellectual Property Conference April 12, 2012 2011 Winston & Strawn LLP Leveling
More informationDAY ONE: Monday, February 26, 2018
7:30 8:30 Breakfast & Registration 8:30 8:45 Welcome and Introductions (Cooper, Rea, Weinlein) 8:45 10:00 [Panel 1 (or Keynotes)] Legislative And Administrative Efforts To Make United States Patent Protection
More informationNorway. Norway. By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS
Norway By Rune Nordengen, Bull & Co Advokatfirma AS 1. What are the most effective ways for a European patent holder whose rights cover your jurisdiction to enforce its rights in your jurisdiction? Cases
More informationThe Canadian Abridgment edigests -- Intellectual Property
IPY.II.4.c.iii The Canadian Abridgment edigests -- Intellectual Property 2012-20 May 14, 2012 Classification Number: II.4.c.iii Patents -- Validity of patent -- Invention -- Obviousness gear infringed
More informationTrademark Law of the People's Republic of China
Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China ( Adopted at the 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People 's Congress on August 23, 1982, as amended according to the "Decision
More informationIntroduction to the Third Amendment of the Trademark Law of China. August 30, 2013
Introduction to the Third Amendment of the Trademark Law of China August 30, 2013 Background China started to work on the third amendment to its Trademark Law in 2003 (the second amendment was adopted
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION ON PATENT APPLICATIONS IN JAPAN
GENERAL INFORMATION ON PATENT APPLICATIONS IN JAPAN Japan is a member of the Paris Convention. Any patent or utility model application claiming priority based on the basic application must be filed within
More informationITC Litigation in the U.S. MIP Global IP Briefing August 26, 2015, Singapore
ITC Litigation in the U.S. MIP Global IP Briefing August 26, 2015, Singapore Presenters Shaobin Zhu ( 朱韶斌 ): Moderator Attorney at Law, Shanghai Representative Office Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett
More informationIn this Issue. Dec 2015 Vol. 15. IP Update. Jiaquan IP Law Firm. Chinese C919 Airliner is Rolled-out. 1. IP Update
Dec 2015 Vol. 15 In this Issue 1. IP Update 2. Defense of Legitimate Source in Patent Infringement Litigation Jiaquan IP Law Firm Add: Suite 910, Tower A Winner Plaza 100 Huangpu Avenue W. Guangzhou, 510627
More informationDomestic Foreign TOTAL Domestic Foreign TOTAL Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted Appl. Granted
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION Recognized Group of Indonesia COUNTRY REPORT 58 th Council Meetings, Jeju, Korea, 16-19 October 2010 Compilation by APAA Group Indonesia (Mrs. Migni Myriasandra Noerhadi)
More informationIntroduction & Key Countries. UAE Egypt Saudi Arabia Jordan Morocco
Hatem Abdelghani Introduction & Key Countries UAE Egypt Saudi Arabia Jordan Morocco United Arab Emirates How does counterfeit come in UAE Enforcement Actions Applicable Laws Punishments Customs Recordation
More informationLaw in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents
Law in the Global Marketplace: Intellectual Property and Related Issues FRAND Commitments and Obligations for Standards-Essential Patents Hosted by: Methodological Overview of FRAND Rate Determination
More informationFrance Baker & McKenzie SCP
Baker & McKenzie SCP This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Patents in Europe 2008 April 2008 France By Jean-François Bretonnière and Tania Kern, Baker & McKenzie SCP, Paris 1. What options
More informationDOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY
Protecting Your Trademarks In a Global Economy October, 2008 DOMESTIC OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING YOUR TRADEMARKS IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY TRADEMARK LITIGATION VERSES CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE ITC by J. Daniel
More informationWHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT?
WHAT IS A PATENT AND WHAT DOES IT PROTECT? A patent is a monopoly granted by the government for an invention that works or functions differently from other inventions. It is necessary for the invention
More informationGermany. Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs. McDermott Will & Emery
GERMANY Germany Henrik Holzapfel and Martin Königs Patent Enforcement Proceedings 1 Lawsuits and courts What legal or administrative proceedings are available for enforcing patent rights against an infringer?
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PATENTS AND UTILITY MODEL RIGHT 3
TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PATENTS AND UTILITY MODEL RIGHT 3 Ⅰ. Patents 3 1. Subjective requirements 3 2. Objective requirements 3 3. Procedural requirements 4 Ⅱ. Utility model right
More informationImpact of the Patent Reform Bill
G. Hopkins Guy, III of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Speaker 3: 1 Impact of the Patent Reform Bill G. Hopkins Guy, Esq. Patent Reform Bill: Current Status Passed House 9/7/07 Passed Senate Judiciary
More informationthe UPC will have jurisdiction over certain European patents (see box The unitary patent and the UPC: a recap ).
THE UNITARY PATENT CENTRAL ENFORCEMENT OF PATENTS IN EUROPE In the second of a two-part series, Susie Middlemiss, Adam Baldwin and Laura Balfour of Slaughter and May examine the structure and procedures
More informationTOPIC 13 CIVIL REMEDIES. LTC Harms Japan 2017
TOPIC 13 CIVIL REMEDIES LTC Harms Japan 2017 SOURCES INTERNATIONAL: TRIPS NATIONAL Statute law: Copyright Act Trade Marks Act Patents Act Procedural law CIVIL REMEDIES Injunctions Interim injunctions Anton
More informationTECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC
TECHNOLOGY & BUSINESS LAW ADVISORS, LLC www.tblawadvisors.com Fall 2011 Business Implications of the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA)
More informationTrademark Law of the People's Republic of China
Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (Adopted at the 24th Session of the Standing Committee of the Fifth National People's Congress on 23 August
More informationJudicial Review: Time for a Closer Look. 20 March April 2007 chinabusinessreview.com
Judicial Review: Time for a Closer Look 20 March April 2007 chinabusinessreview.com FOCUS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The judicial review of Patent Reexamination Board decisions is an important but underused
More informationChina Intellectual Properly News
LEGAL LANGUAGE SERVICES A n affiliateofalsinternationalt e l e p h o n e (212)766-4111 18 John Street T o l l Free (800) 788-0450 Suite 300 T e l e f a x (212) 349-0964 New York, NY 10038 w v, r w l e
More informationShanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai International Arbitration Center) Arbitration Rules
Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai International Arbitration Center) Effective as from January 1, 2015 CONTENTS of Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration
More informationCommon law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.
Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3
More informationGuide to WIPO Services
World Intellectual Property Organization Guide to WIPO Services Helping you protect inventions, trademarks & designs resolve domain name & other IP disputes The World Intellectual Property Organization
More informationDetermination of Patent Infringement Related to Components
Determination of Patent Infringement Related to Components Author: Qiong Peng Strix Ltd. v. Jiatai Ltd. et al. (Civil Judgment (2011) Yi Zhong Min Chu Zi No. 15 issued by the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate
More informationOLIVE & OLIVE, P.A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
OLIVE & OLIVE, P.A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW Since 1957 500 MEMORIAL ST. POST OFFICE BOX 2049 DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27702-2049 (919) 683-5514 A GUIDE TO COMMON TECHNOLOGY-RELATED AGREEMENTS I. AGREEMENT
More informationJapan Japon Japan. Report Q174. in the name of the Japanese Group
Japan Japon Japan Report Q174 in the name of the Japanese Group Jurisdiction and applicable law in the case of cross-border infringement (infringing acts) of intellectual property rights I. The state of
More informationEnhancement of Attraction of Utility Model System
Enhancement of Attraction of Utility Model System January 2004 Patent System Subcommittee, Intellectual Property Policy Committee Industrial Structure Council Chapter 1 Desirable utility model system...
More informationIndustrial Design Rights Law. (Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law No ) ( ), ( ), Chapter I. Title, Effective Date and Definition
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw enacted this Law. Industrial Design Rights Law (Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law No ) ( ), ( ), 2017 Chapter I Title, Effective Date and Definition 1. This Law shall be called the Industrial Design
More informationIntellectual Property. EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC
Intellectual Property EMBL Summer Institute 2010 Dusty Gwinn WVURC Presentation Outline Intellectual Property Patents Trademarks Copyright Trade Secrets Technology Transfer Tech Marketing Tech Assessment
More informationDiscovery in a patent infringement suit in Japan particularly about secrecy order (protective order)
Discovery in a patent infringement suit in Japan particularly about secrecy order (protective order) AIPLA AIPPI Japan/JFBA Joint Meeting April 23, 2009 Hideo Ozaki City-Yuwa Partners http://www.city-yuwa.com/ip-group/en
More informationACT AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ACT*/**/***
ACT ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES And ACT AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN OF PRODUCTS AND NN 173/2003,
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATIONS ON INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS (As amended by Office Order No. 18, s and as modified by Office Order No. 12, s.
OFFICE ORDER NO. 79 Series of 2005 SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATIONS ON INTER PARTES PROCEEDINGS (As amended by Office Order No. 18, s. 1998 and as modified by Office Order No. 12, s. 2002) Whereas,
More information