419B Signature. Expected Learning Outcomes (ELOs)

Transcription

1 University Name : HASANUDDIN UNIVERSITY Faculty Name : FACULTY OF LAW Department Name : CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Study Program Name : UNDERGRADUATE LEGAL STUDIES SEMESTER LEARNING PLAN (SLP) COURSE COURSE CODE CSU STATUS DEPARTMENT SM ADMINISTRATIVE COURT PROCEDURAL LAW AND PRACTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AUTHORIZATION 419B LECTURER Signature COMPULSORY (NATIONAL) Constitutional Law VII Vice Dean of Academic and Development Signature A.1. G.1. G.2. G.3. S.1. S.3. K.3. Prof. Dr. Abdul Razak, SH, MH Prof. Dr. Ahmadi Miru, SH, MH Expected Learning Outcomes (ELOs) Having integrity and legal professional ethics based on values of Pancasila Ability to think critically, logically and systematically Ability to perform oral and written communication Ability to work individually and collectively Ability to conduct legal research to construct legal arguments Ability to provide legal advice and solutions Demonstrate a mastery of procedural laws (procedural criminal law, procedural civil law, and procedural administrative law)

2 LEARNING GOALS After mastering theory and norms concerning the history of courts in Indonesia, the background of the establishment of the Court in Indonesia, courts terms, the differences between pure and pseudo- Courts, the main characteristics of Courts and General Courts, absolute and relative competencies, Disputes, Decisions as the object of Dispute or causes of Disputes, the parties of Disputes, the process of Court-examination, trial/various procedural law in Courts, the structure of petitions for free litigation, petitions for quicker litigation, and petitions for postponement of Decision implementation, structure, and material of the power of attorney, definition, structure and material of the claim, Defendant's Reply, Replik/Response to Defendant's Reply, Duplik/ Response to Replik, Proof of examination ofstate Dispute, Conclusion of parties in the trial, types of verdicts in Dispute, Students aretherefore able to construct legal documents (power of attorney, claim, defendant's answer, replik, duplik) required in the trial process professionally and equitably. Short Description of The Course This course discussconcerning the history of courts in Indonesia, the background of the establishment of the Court in Indonesia, courts terms, the differences between pure and pseudo- Courts, the main characteristics of Courts and General Courts, absolute and relative competencies, Disputes, Decisions as the object of Dispute or causes of Disputes, the parties of Disputes, the process of Court-examination, trial/various procedural law in Courts, the structure of petitions for free litigation, petitions for quicker litigation, and petitions for postponement of Decision implementation, structure, and material of the power of attorney, definition, structure and material of the claim, Defendant's Reply, Replik/Response to Defendant's Reply, Duplik/ Response to Replik, Proof of examination ofstate Dispute, Conclusion of parties in the trial, types of verdicts in Dispute, Students are therefore able to construct legal documents (power of attorney, claim, defendant's answer, replik, duplik) required in the trial process

3 REFERENCES : BaharuddinLopa (et. Al), 198. Peradilna Tata Usaha Negara, SinarGrafika. Jakarta. Benyamin Mangkudilaga, KompotensiRelatifdan Absolut PengadilanDalamLingkunganPeradilan TUN. Angkasa. Bandung. H. Eddy Djunaidi, (et.al) (Editor), MengkajiKembaliPokok-PokokPikiranPembentukanPeradilan TUN di Indonesia, LembagaPenelitiandanPengembanganHukumAdministrasiNegara; (LPP-HAN), Jakarta. Indroharto, 1991: Usaha Memagami UU tentangperadilan Tata usahanegara. PustakaSinarharapan. Jakarta. Irfan Fachruddin,2004 :PengawasanPeradilanAdministrasiTerhadapTindakanPemerintah. PT. Alumni. Bandung JazimHamidi, 1999 :Penerapan AAUPPL DilingkunganPeradilanAdministrasi Indonesia. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. Fak. HukumUnpad, 1979 :LaporanPenelitiantentangstrukturOrganisasiBadan-badanPeradilan Di Indonesia, LP.HukumdanKriminologi, FH-UNPAD. Bandung. MartimanProdjohamidjojo, 1993 :Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta. M. Nasir, 2003 :Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Djambatan. Jakarta. Muchsan, 1981: Seri HukumAdministrasi; PeradilanAdministrasi Negara, Liberty. Yogyakarta. Paulus EffendyLotulung, 1993, BeberapaSistemtentangKontrolSegiHukumterhadapPemerintah.. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Edisi II. Bandung. Philipus M. Hadjon, 1987 :PerlindunganHukumBagi Rakyat Indonesia. PT. Bina Ilmu. Surabaya.. R.H. KasmanSingodimedjo (et.al) 1973:PerkembanganPeradilantentangPertanggunganjawab Negara (Judulasli : De Ontwikkeling Der RechtspraakBetreffende De Staatsaansprakelijkheidoleh R. Karananenburg), Permata. Jakarta. RochmatSoemitro, 1990 :Peradilan Tata usaha Negara. PT. Eresco. Bandung. R.Soegijatno, 2000 : Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negarad di Indonesia, SinarGrafika. Jakarta. SjachranBasah, EksistensidanTolokUkurdanKompotensiPeradilanAdministrasi di Indonesia, Alumni. Bandung. SjachranBasah, 1986/1987 : Hukum Acara PengadilanDalamLingkunganPeradilanAdministrasi, Rajawali Pers. Jakarta, S.F. Marbun, 1997; PeradilanAdministrasinegaradanUpayaAdministratif di Indonesia. Liberty. Yogyakarta. ZairinHarahap, 1997 :Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. PT. RajaGrafindoPersada. Jakarta. Z.A. Sangadji, 2003: KompotensiBadanPeradilanUmumdanPeradilan Tata usahanegara (DalamGugatanPembatalanSertifikat Tanah).PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung

4 Meeting Number - Expected Final Ability / Learning Goal LEARNING MATERIAL LEARNING METHODS Time Allocation Indicator/Assesment Criteria (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Course opening, students : Course opening, explainabout Brainstorming Ability to 2% I agree on Course Contract, a. Learning Goals understand course and Assessment System b. Course Contract Literature Research lesson plan based c. Assessment System on learning goals II Students are able to elaborate the History of Indonesian Courts The Historyof Indonesian Courts: a. Kingdom, b. Colonialism c. Independence The World CourtSystem Reference Update Ability to ask and express Ability to correlate Weigh t (%) 2% III IV the establishment background of Courts in Indonesia Students are able to differentiate the use of Trials and Courts Students are able to distinguish between Pure Courts and Quasi- Court Establishment of Courts in Indonesia : a. The rule of law and Court b. Purpose of the Court Definition of: a. Trials and Courts, b. Pure Court c. Pseudo- Court Previous material review Individual Assignment Ability to analyze the establishment of Court Procedural Ability to explain previous material Ability to ask and express Accuracy indistinguishing the terms Accuracy in distinguishing Pure Courts and pseudo- Court 2% 2%

5 V-VI VII VIII IX the status of Courts and Students are able to differentiate the main characteristics of the Courts and General Court the Relative competence and Absolute competence of Court Procedural Students are able to distinguish between Dispute and other disputes; Decision as an object of Dispute or cause of Dispute Students are able to elaborate the parties of Status of Court Procedural; Characteristic of Court Procedural. Court Competence: a. Relative Competence b. Absolute Competence Dispute; Causes of Dispute Subject/ the parties of Dispute : Small Grousp Discussion Brainstorming Ability to interact with friends during discussion Accuracy of elaborating Collecting assignments on time Accuracy in analyze the competence of Courts Accuracy in differentiate between Dispute and other disputes analyzing elaborating the 2%

6 X XI XII-XIII Dispute Students are able to relate and explain process/ the examination process in trial of Court Procedural the differences of Court Procedural in Court Procedural Students are able to describe the material and structure of free litigation petition, the quick-case litigation petition, and the petition for postponement implementation of State Decision a. Plaintiff b. Defendant Process sequence of State case: a. Dismissal Process b. Preliminary examination c. Trial examination Common Court Procedural Law; Short Court Procedural Law; Fast Court Procedural Law Free litigation petition; a. Structure b. Material Quick-case litigation petition; a. Structure b. Material Petition for postponement implementation of State Decision; Material Review Material Review Brainstorming parties of State Dispute Students activeness in opinion relating and explaining Ability to ask and express Students activeness in relating and explaining Ability to ask and express Ability to to describe the material and structure of free litigation petition, the quick-case litigation petition, and the petition for postponement implementation of

7 XIV XV the definition, structure and material of power of attorney the definition, structure and material of claim a. Structure b. Material Definition of Power of attorney; Structure of Power of attorney; Material of Power of attorney Definition of claim; Structure of claim; Material of claim: a. Identity of parties; b. Posita; c. Petitum Complete Registration of claim. Self Directed Learning Individual Assignment State Decision Student activeness in analyzing the elaborating structure of Power of attorney Student activeness in analyzing the elaborating structure of claim Student activeness in Collecting assignments on time

8 XVI XVII XVIII XIX XX the definition, structure and material of Defendant s Reply Students are able to elaborate and analyze material concerning of Replik/ Response to Defendant's Reply Students are able to elaborate and analyze material concerning Duplik/ Response to Replik Students are able to understand and explain the theory of evidence, the Definition of Defendant s Reply; Structure of Defendant s Reply; Material of Defendant s Reply Definition of Replik; Structure of Replik; Material of Replik MID TEST Definition of Duplik; Structure of Duplik; Material of Duplik a. Theory of evidence b. Burden of proof c. Evidences Small Group Discussion Quiz Written Examination Case Study analyzing the analyzing the Student activeness in answering questions Honesty Accuracy of and structure analyzing Student activeness in analyzing the 5%

9 XXI XXII XXIII burden of proof and evidence used in the examination of the dispute. Students are able to elaborate and analyze material concerning of Conclusion of parties in the trial the background of each type of verdict in the dispute Students have experience and direct observation in seeing and assessing the trial process with real cases in the Court Definition of Conclusion of parties; Structure of Conclusion Material of Conclusion Types of Verdict; Granted Claim; Rejected Claim; Unaccepted Claim; Fall Claim Court Practice Small Group Discussion Brainstorming Court Practice; Visit to Court Real case observation conducting model of determining the use of evidence theory based on its case Student activeness in elaborating Student activeness in analyzing Accuracy in differentiate types of verdict Participation in visiting Court analyzing based on case in Court (made as report) 2%

10 XXIV XXV XXVI Students are able to construct basis material of Power of attorney Students are able to construct structure and basis material of Decision Students are able to construct the claim Power of attorney Decision Structure of claim: a. Identity of parties; b. Posita; c. Petitum Claim Material Self Practice Self Practice Division of groups and division of State Decision Group Assignment Presentation Brainstorming practicing to make the power of attorney constructing structure of Decision Accuracy of practicing to construct Decision analyzing Decision as an object of claim in Dispute constructing the claim Collecting assignment on time

11 XXVII XXVIII XXIX Students are able to construct the Defendant s Reply Students are able to construct the Replik/ Response to Defendant's Reply Students are able to construct Duplik/ Response to Replik StructureofDefendant s ReplyMaterial of Defendant s Reply Structureof Replik Material of Replik Structureof Duplik Material of Duplik Group Assignment Presentation Brainstorming Group Assignment Presentation Brainstorming Group Assignment Presentation Brainstorming Presentation Skills Accuracy of analyzing the claim to construct responses in the form of Defendants' Reply Accuracy inconstructingthedef endant'sreply Collecting assignment on time Presentation Skills Accuracyofanalyzing thedefendant s Reply toconstructresponses in the form of Replik Accuracy in constructing the Replik Collecting assignment on time Presentation Skills Accuracyofanalyzing the Replik toconstruct responses in theformof Duplik Accuracy in constructing the 5% 5%

12 XXX XXXI Students have experience and directlyobserveas well asassesses the trial process with real cases in Court Students are able to arrange and place courtroom facilities CourtPractice Arrangement of courtroom and placing its equipments Court Practicum; Visit to Court Real case observation Group Discussion Duplik Collecting assignment on time Presentation Skills Participation in visiting Court analyzing based on case in Court (made as report) Ability to arrange the courtroom 1% XXXII FINAL TEST Written Examination answering questions Honesty during the test 15%