A Practical Guide To Teaming Agreement Drafting and Enforcement in Virginia and Maryland
|
|
- Luke Price
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Practical Guide To Teaming Agreement Drafting and Enforcement in Virginia and Maryland Presented by: Anand V. Ramana, Partner, McGuireWoods LLP Douglas P. DeMoss, Division Counsel, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Eric L. Yeo, Associate General Counsel, Booz Allen Hamilton
2 Anand Ramana Anand is an experienced first-chair trial lawyer. He regularly appears in the federal and state courts of Northern Virginia and the District of Columbia. Although his practice mainly consists of preparing for and conducting bench and jury trials, he devotes a significant portion of his time to briefing and arguing appeals. Partner McGuireWoods LLP (202) aramana@mcguirewoods.com Anand prosecutes and defends lawsuits related to a wide variety of commercial contract and business disputes. In recent years, he has litigated disputes involving banking and foreclosure practices, property acquisition and development/construction contracts, commercial leases and other conveying instruments, UCC matters, insurance coverage, commercial landlord-tenant relationships, zoning and land use matters, and consumer protection matters. Anand s commercial litigation practice often extends to representing government prime contractors and subcontractors of all sizes. His government contracts experience primarily includes litigating teaming agreement and subcontractor disputes between government contractors. In 2016, he led the appellate team that successfully argued to the Virginia Supreme Court that a seven-figure jury verdict enforcing a teaming agreement should be vacated. One month later, he obtained a $12 million jury verdict involving fraud and breach of a teaming agreement. Anand also counsels clients on a wide range of issues, has litigated contract award disputes before the Government Accountability Office and federal and state agencies, and has prosecuted and defended federal contract claims before boards of contract appeals. McGuireWoods 2
3 Doug DeMoss Corporate Director and Division Counsel Northrop Grumman Mission Systems (703) Doug DeMoss is a co-chair of the ACC National Capital Region s Government Contracts Forum. Since 2013, he has been a division counsel with Northrop Grumman Corporation, supporting complex technology programs in its Information Systems and the Mission Systems sectors. From 2005 to 2013, Doug was the general counsel of General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, where he managed the company s litigation, acquisitions and divestitures, business transactions, labor and employment, intellectual property, and corporate compliance activities. Before joining General Dynamics, Doug was a senior counsel with Northrop Grumman, supporting its Intelligence Systems and Surveillance & Reconnaissance divisions. Prior to that position, he supported Northrop Grumman Newport News, a builder of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S. Navy. Doug started his legal career as an Army JAGC officer, holding a variety of acquisition and litigation positions, including serving as Assistant to the Army General Counsel for acquisition matters, supporting missile, intelligence, electronic warfare, communications, and information technology programs. Prior to law school, Doug was an officer in the Army Corps of Engineers. He received his B.S. degree from the United States Military Academy at West Point, and his J.D. degree from the College of William & Mary, where he served as a Law Review editor and was inducted into the Order of the Coif. From 1999 to 2004, Doug taught at William & Mary as an adjunct professor of government contract law. He holds an LL.M. degree with a concentration in contract law from the Army JAG School, and he is a past president of the Charlotte Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel. McGuireWoods 3
4 Eric Yeo Eric Yeo is a Principal/Director and Associate General Counsel at Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., in McLean, VA. Eric joined Booz Allen in His duties and responsibilities have included: serving as a lead attorney for the Defense Group, with primary responsibility for the Navy/Marine Corps, Air Force, Joint Combatant Commands, and Infrastructure & Military Health accounts; managing and supervising the Organizational Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Program Office, a team of attorneys and compliance professionals who provide OCI analysis and counsel across all accounts; and managing internal investigations. His areas of focus include intellectual property, claims, and litigation. Associate General Counsel Booz Allen Hamilton Before Booz Allen, Eric served as in-house counsel for IBM U.S. Federal for more than five years where he supported IBM s Federal Civilian accounts, including the GSA Schedules. Prior to that, he was in private practice with Holland & Knight in Northern Virginia. (703) yeo_eric@bah.com Education! Boston University (B.A., 1997)! American University Washington College of Law (J.D. 2000) McGuireWoods 4
5 The Business Quandary With Teaming Offeror/Proposed Prime Contractor! Need: To exclusively secure all team members for bid! Risk: A binding promise to award work to a subcontractor that the government may not require Proposed Subcontractor! Need: To secure a binding promise of future work! Risk: Being used to win a bid with little/no reward McGuireWoods 5
6 The Legal Solutions Proposed Prime Contractor Draft a teaming agreement that secures the team member while retaining flexibility as a prime to address unknown future events and manage the contract Legal Translation: Draft post-award subcontract award obligations subject to potential changes or specific events (e.g., government requirements, pricing changes, prime contractor discretion, etc.) McGuireWoods 6
7 The Legal Solutions Proposed Subcontractor Draft a teaming agreement that binds the prime contractor to some or all of amount of work or revenue for its participation in the winning team Legal Translation: Draft post-award subcontract award rights as non-negotiable and with clarity and specificity McGuireWoods 7
8 The Law of Teaming Agreements General Contract Law To be enforceable, there must be a mutual assent of the contracting parties to terms reasonably certain under the circumstances Should specify a sum or a method or formula alleged for determining the amount payable in [the transaction]. The agreement must provide a reasonable basis for affording a remedy for its breach Allen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 222 Va. 361 (1981) McGuireWoods 8
9 The Law of Teaming Agreements Notable Teaming Agreement Cases Agostini v. Consolvo, 154 Va. 203 (1930) Prime contractor accepts letter offer from subcontractor to perform masonry work subject to a future formalized subcontract Prime contractor reneges on obligation to award masonry work and subcontractor sues Court enforces the letter agreement and enters judgment against prime contractor notwithstanding the future formalized agreement W.J. Schafer Assocs. v. Cordant, Inc., 254 Va. 514 (1997) Prime enters into teaming agreement with proposed subcontractor for digitizers Teaming agreement does not include price and indicates that digitizers may not be available in time Prime contractor reneges on obligation to purchase digitizers from teaming partner and teaming partner sues Trial court enters judgment for subcontractor, Supreme Court reverses because no mutual commitment for sale of digitizers given the lack of material terms McGuireWoods 9
10 The Law of Teaming Agreements Notable Teaming Agreement Cases EG&G, Inc. v. The Cube Corp., 63 Va. Cir. 634 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2002) Prime contractor enters into teaming agreement for engineering services No language about negotiating in good faith Trial court took evidence beyond the four corners of the agreement to establish parties intent to be bound Court enforced the teaming agreement, mandated specific performance Cyberlock Consulting, Inc. v. Info. Experts, Inc., 939 F. Supp. 2d 572 (E.D. Va. 2013), aff d 549 Fed. Appx. 211 (4th Cir. 2014) Prime contractor enters into teaming agreement for 49% workshare Language includes obligation to negotiate in good faith and indicates flexibility in future subcontract terms Court holds post-award teaming agreement obligations unenforceable Court cited an earlier teaming agreement where a subcontract was attached McGuireWoods 10
11 The Law of Teaming Agreements Notable Teaming Agreement Cases Advance Telecom Process LLC v. DSFederal Inc., 224 Md. App. 164 (2015) Subcontractor contacts prime contractor and enters teaming agreement for two immigration programs Teaming agreement language indicates that parties would negotiate subcontract in good faith after award Prime contractor wins award, then terminates subcontractor Court holds agreement unenforceable because no intent to be bound to definite terms Navar, Inc. v. Fed. Bus. Council, 291 Va. 338 (2016) Prime contractor teams with proposed subcontractor Teaming agreement obligates a workshare up to 49% and indicates subcontract would be negotiated in good faith after award Jury awards $1.25 for subcontractor; award reversed and vacated on appeal McGuireWoods 11
12 The Law of Teaming Agreements Notable Teaming Agreement Cases CGI Federal Inc. v. FCI Federal, Inc., 94 Va. Cir. 138 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 2016) Prime contractor teams with incumbent prime (as subcontractor) for work being transitioned to 8(a) program Teaming agreement promises subcontractor 41% workshare, specific management positions, and specific scope of work by CLIN Prime submits proposals without these requirements before signing amended teaming agreement with the knowledge that it does not intend to perform teaming agreement Prime obtains the award, terminates teaming partner, takes most work for itself Proposed subcontractor sues on breach of contract and fraud theories Jury awards proposed subcontractor $3.5M (breach) and $8.5M (fraud) Trial judge acknowledges fraud, but vacates both awards based on Cyberlock; currently on appeal to Virginia Supreme Court McGuireWoods 12
13 Considered Factors In Reported Decisions Factor One: Future Negotiations Proposed Prime: Ensure teaming agreement includes language that expressly contemplates subcontract negotiations after prime award Use terms like shall negotiate a subcontract or will try to agree on a subcontract arrangement Proposed Subcontractor: Ensure teaming agreement does not in any way contemplate future negotiations Eliminate all negotiation terms or any provisions indicating that other subcontract terms will be discussed at a later date McGuireWoods 13
14 Considered Factors In Reported Decisions Factor Two: Uncertainty of Subcontract Existence Proposed Prime: Ensure teaming agreement reflects that there is no certainty of executing of a subcontract Include a provision that end parties relationship unless a fully integrated subcontract is agreed and executed within 60 or 90 days Incorporate a term that permits prime to use another subcontractor if team member s product or services are unavailable when needed Proposed Subcontractor: Include an express provision that a team member shall begin performance on a date certain Teaming agreement should read like it is the subcontract, or attach the subcontract as an Exhibit to be executed after prime award McGuireWoods 14
15 Considered Factors In Reported Decisions Factor Three: Scope of Work (For Proposed Prime Contractor) Retain discretion and/or authority to define and assign scope of work Include a provision that permits prime to define or adjust the proposed scope of work after prime award either unilaterally (preferred) or after any government requirements change Incorporate a term that permits prime to use another subcontractor if team member s product/service is unavailable when needed Provide that any subcontract with team member shall include, among other things, a subcontract approvals provision McGuireWoods 15
16 Considered Factors In Reported Decisions Factor Three: Scope of Work (For Proposed Subcontractor) Specific tasks and portion (percentage) of work should be precise Clearly define scope by identifying percentage of work by CLIN or some other contractual category (e.g., SOW/PWS section), FTEs, or incumbent work First right of refusal? Eat what you kill? If possible, include a provision that expressly states that team member shall begin certain tasks once the government awards the prime contract McGuireWoods 16
17 Considered Factors In Reported Decisions Factor Four: Pricing Proposed Prime: Subcontractor pricing should not be included in teaming agreement (preferred) or should be flexible Include NTE levels instead of prices Incorporate a provision that permits parties to adjust subcontractor pricing after prime award Proposed Subcontractor: Clearly identify pricing technique and price figures Specify firm fixed price, T&M, CPFF, etc. Identify labor prices, any fees, firm fixed price items, markups, etc. McGuireWoods 17
18 Other Legal Considerations for Drafters! Liquidated damages! Arbitration! Choice of law provision: Delaware Must be a nexus of the parties or transaction to Delaware! Exclusivity and non-exclusivity Antitrust concerns Practical concerns: separate teams, firewalls, key personnel! Intellectual property Use rights in background IP Ownership and possible use restrictions if any jointly-developed IP McGuireWoods 18
19 Other Legal Considerations for Drafters! Termination events! Non-solicitation of employees! Working with international teammates! Alternatives to teaming (MOUs, subcontracts, quotes, IP licenses, etc.)! OCIs McGuireWoods 19
20 Questions or Comments? McGuireWoods 20
CGI FEDERAL INC. OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN June 7, 2018 FCi FEDERAL, INC.
PRESENT: All the Justices CGI FEDERAL INC. OPINION BY v. Record No. 170617 JUSTICE ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN June 7, 2018 FCi FEDERAL, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Michael F. Devine, Judge
More informationIs an Unenforceable Teaming Agreement a Valid FAR Team Arrangement?
Is an Unenforceable Teaming Agreement a Valid FAR Team Arrangement? American Bar Association Subcontracting, Teaming, and Strategic Alliances Committee July 6, 2016 Michael W. Mutek 1. Enforceability Recent
More informationGOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW
AN A.S. PRATT PUBLICATION OCTOBER 2018 VOL. 4 NO. 10 PRATT S GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING LAW REPORT EDITOR S NOTE: COMPLIANCE Victoria Prussen Spears TINA CHANGES IMPACT COST AND PRICING COMPLIANCE Paul E.
More informationGEORGE MASON AMERICAN INN OF COURT A LITIGATOR S PERPSECTIVE ON CONTRACTS
GEORGE MASON AMERICAN INN OF COURT A LITIGATOR S PERPSECTIVE ON CONTRACTS September 26, 2017 Pupilage Team Members: Randall K. Miller, Esq. Nicholas M. DePalma, Esq. Michelle Owen West (Student Member)
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Mach I AREP Carlyle Center LLC ) ) Under Contract No. DACA-31-5-2010-0181 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA
More informationDavid A. Dorey Partner Business Litigation N. Market Street Wilmington, DE
David A. Dorey Partner Business Litigation 1201 N. Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 +1.302.425.6418 dorey@ David Dorey is a business and corporate trial lawyer. David views litigation as an art. With
More informationDispute resolution. Construction Law Survival Manual. Credit Management Fair Credit Reporting Act Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Dispute resolution Presented by James D. Fullerton 1 www.fullertonlaw.com JFullerton@FullertonLaw.com James D. Fullerton Fullerton & Knowles, P.C. 12642 Chapel Rd. Clifton, VA 20124 (703) 818-2600, Ext.
More informationCRITERIA FOR CHOOSING BETWEEN CONSENSUS DOCS AND AIA BOND FORMS. I don't want no ConsensusDOCS bond form or do I???
CRITERIA FOR CHOOSING BETWEEN CONSENSUS DOCS AND AIA BOND FORMS Or I don't want no ConsensusDOCS bond form or do I??? Deborah S. Griffin Gina A. Fonte Holland & Knight LLP Boston, MA 02116 Presented at
More informationand 13 C.F.R should be consulted for what those exceptions are.
24 Contract Management November 2010 In the April 2010 issue of Contract Management Magazine, the various elements to consider before entering into a teaming arrangement were discussed in the article,
More information7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP David Daneman Partner 7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21202-1636 Phone: 410.347.8729 Fax: 410.234.2317 Email: ddaneman@wtplaw.com Experience Mr. Daneman, a partner
More informationDuke University School of Law, Juris Doctor, 1972 College of the Holy Cross, Bachelor of Arts Degree in English, 1969
Joseph A. McManus, Jr. Managing Partner McManus & Felsen LLP Telephone: 202-296-9260 Ext. 1214 Email: jmcmanus@mcmanus-felsen.com LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephmcmanus-3285a013 Practice Areas
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CV Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Evelyn E. Queen, Trial Judge)
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. Lower Tribunal Case No. 09-CA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Lower Tribunal Case No. 09-CA-001404 VILA & SON LANDSCAPING CORPORATION, Petitioner vs. POSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent PETITIONER'S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationForeign Contractor And Subcontractor Claims Against The United States Government Part One
Foreign Contractor And Subcontractor Claims Against The United States Government Part One by John B. Tieder, Jr., Senior Partner, Paul A. Varela, Senior Partner, and David B. Wonderlick, Partner Watt Tieder
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF THE REAL ESTATE FINANCE OPINION REPORT OF 2012
2014 An Overview Of The Real Estate Finance Opinion Report Of 2012 153 AN OVERVIEW OF THE REAL ESTATE FINANCE OPINION REPORT OF 2012 Robert J. Krapf and Edward J. Levin* Many state bars and other professional
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit CLEVELAND ASSETS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee 2017-2113 Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in
More informationPreliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes:
1 Preliminary Injunctive Relief to Protect Trade Secrets and Enforce Non-Competes: Is It Possible To Put The Toothpaste Back In The Tube? Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome
More informationConstruction Law Survival Manual. Reviewing and Revising Construction Contracts
Reviewing and Revising Construction Contracts Presented by James D. Fullerton 1 www.fullertonlaw.com JFullerton@FullertonLaw.com James D. Fullerton Fullerton & Knowles, P.C. 12642 Chapel Rd. Clifton, VA
More informationRobert T. Smith. Partner Washington, DC p Practices. Recognition. Education.
Robert T. Smith Partner robert.smith1@kattenlaw.com Washington, DC p +1.202.625.3616 Practices FOCUS: Litigation and Dispute Resolution White Collar, Investigations and Compliance Appellate and Supreme
More informationMasters of the Courtroom SM
Masters of the Courtroom SM Ethics The Hon. Martin L.C. Feldman, USDC EDLA Mary E. Howell Richard C. Stanley, Stanley Reuter Course Number: 0200141211 1 Hour of Ethics CLE December 11, 2014 4:00 5:00 p.m.
More informationA. SOURCES OF THE LAW
COURSE: Business Law GRADE(S): 9-12 UNIT: Basics of Law NATIONAL STANDARDS Achievement Standard: Analyze the relationship between ethics and the law and describe sources of the law, the structure of the
More informationWest Palm Beach Hotel v. Atlanta Underground LLC
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-14-2015 West Palm Beach Hotel v. Atlanta Underground LLC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationwhich we were successful in obtaining a preliminary injunction against borrowers. Additionally, SAC later received summary judgment over all of Plaint
JOHN A. (JACK) CRAWFORD, JR. Jackson Office (601) 985-4532 jack.crawford@butlersnow.com Jack is experienced in financial services litigation and commercial litigation matters. He has been AV-rated by Martindale-Hubbell
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC Petitioner, Appeal No.: 4D v. L.T. Case No.: CA035159XXXXMB
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA BLACKTOP, INC., CASE NO.: SC12-1449 Petitioner, Appeal No.: 4D11-408 v. L.T. Case No.: 502009CA035159XXXXMB WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent. / PETITIONER
More informationCase 1:12-cv JCC-TRJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 168
Case 1:12-cv-00396-JCC-TRJ Document 27 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID# 168 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division CYBERLOCK CONSULTING, INC., )
More informationINTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Page 1 2 of 35 DOCUMENTS INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, ALLEGHENY CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants-Appellees, versus AMERICARIBE-MORIARTY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
W.C. English, Inc. v. Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP et al Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA LYNCHBURG DIVISION W.C. ENGLISH, INC., v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 6:17-CV-00018
More informationJohn W. Terwilleger Attorney, Gunster West Palm Beach, Florida
John W. Terwilleger Attorney, Gunster West Palm Beach, Florida Violation of General Antitrust Statutes Teaming Agreements that may constitute unreasonable restraints on trade. Restrictive Covenants Teaming
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 4 December Appeal by defendants from Amended Judgment entered 8 March
NO. COA12-636 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 4 December 2012 SOUTHERN SEEDING SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. Guilford County No. 09 CVS 12411 W.C. ENGLISH, INC.; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY;
More informationContract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 8 Chapter 8
Contract Law for Paralegals: Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Tab Text CHAPTER 8 Contract Enforceability: Protecting a Party Against Overreaching Chapter 8 deals with the second group of contract enforcement problems-ad
More informationMorrow v. Kroger: Obtained summary judgment on all claims of employer liability for sexual harassment and retaliation, affirmed by the Fifth Circuit C
MELODY MCANALLY Memphis Office (901) 680-7322 melody.mcanally@butlersnow.com Melody focuses her practice on data privacy and security and commercial litigation. She is Co-Team Leader of Butler Snow s Data
More informationProcrastinators Programs SM
Procrastinators Programs SM The Relationship between Bankruptcy and Construction Law Frederick L. Bunol The Derbes Law Firm Melanie M. Mulcahy The Derbes Law Firm Course Number: 0200141217 1 Hour of CLE
More informationNo C (Filed: March 31, 2004) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
No. 04-424C (Filed: March 31, 2004) BLUE WATER ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Bid Protest; Motion to Dismiss; Federal Agency Purchasing Agent; Day-to-Day Supervision David
More informationDISPUTES AND CLAIM RESOLUTION
1 DISPUTES AND CLAIM RESOLUTION August 14-16, 2017 Presented by: www.watttieder.com Robert M. Fitzgerald rfitzgerald@watttieder.com Carter B. Reid creid@watttieder.com 1765 Greensboro Station Place Suite
More informationTHE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS
THE MINOR LEAGUE: TAKING CARE OF JUNIOR SETTLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF MINOR S CLAIMS Presented and Prepared by: Joseph K. Guyette jguyette@heylroyster.com Champaign, Illinois 217.344.0060 Heyl, Royster, Voelker
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- Tele-Consultants, Inc. Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 58129 Thomas 0. Mason, Esq. Francis E.
More informationPrufrex USA, Inc. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE
Prufrex USA, Inc. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE 1 Contract Formation: These Terms and Conditions of Purchase (the "Terms and Conditions") apply to any purchases by Prufrex USA, Inc., its subsidiaries,
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) DynPort Vaccine Company LLC ) ) Under Contract No. DAMDl 7-98-C-8024 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No.
More informationPROCUREMENT FRAUD PANEL DISCUSSION. June 14, :30 P.M.
PROCUREMENT FRAUD PANEL DISCUSSION June 14, 2018 1:30 P.M. PANELISTS DAVID J. CHIZEWER GOLDBERG KOHN VINCENT MCKNIGHT SANFORD HEISLER SHARP LLP DONALD J. WILLIAMSON UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
More informationTo TRO or Not to TRO? An Employer s Enforcement Perspective of Non-Compete Agreements. Paul A. Fenn * * *
To TRO or Not to TRO? An Employer s Enforcement Perspective of Non-Compete Agreements Paul A. Fenn * * * Paul Fenn is a litigator whose primary area of practice focuses on business and commercial disputes
More informationEthical Implications in a Big Data Environment. September 29, :00 2:00 PM
Ethical Implications in a Big Data Environment September 29, 2014 12:00 2:00 PM William Wallace Belt, Jr. Speaker Deloitte Transactions & Business Analytics LLP William Belt is a Director in the Discovery
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 52785, 53699 ) Under Contract No. N00024-92-C-6300 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stanley R. Soya,
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD 6F CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD 6F CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Xerox Corporation Under Contract No. GS-25F-0062L Delivery Order No. W9133L-07-F-0003 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 584 78 Jonathan S. Aronie,
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
In the United States Court of Federal Claims BID PROTEST No. 16-1684C (Filed Under Seal: December 23, 2016 Reissued: January 10, 2017 * MUNILLA CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, LLC, v. Plaintiff, THE UNITED STATES
More information7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Richard J. Magid Senior Counsel 7 Saint Paul Street Baltimore, MD 21202-1636 Phone: 410.347.8716 Fax: 410.223.3496 Email: rmagid@wtplaw.com Experience Mr. Magid focuses
More informationResponding to a Complaint: Maryland
Resource ID: w-011-5932 Responding to a Complaint: Maryland CHRISTOPHER C. JEFFRIES AND STEVEN A. BOOK, KRAMON & GRAHAM, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION Search the Resource ID numbers in blue on Westlaw
More informationCase 1:15-cv JCC-TCB Document 34 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 357
Case 1:15-cv-01463-JCC-TCB Document 34 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 357 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division MERIDIAN INVESTMENTS, INC. )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking ) Association, as successor-in-interest to LaSalle ) Bank National Association,
More informationThe Real Estate Finance Opinion Report of 2012
The Real Estate Finance Opinion Report of 2012 History and Summary By Edward J. Levin Edward J. Levin is a partner in the Baltimore, Maryland, office of Gordon Feinblatt LLC and the chair of the Real Property
More informationLitigation Avoidance
Litigation Avoidance 101 Thinking Through the Use of Boilerplate Provisions for Arbitration, Mediation, and Attorney Fees in Real Estate Contracts By Michael F. Donner Attorneys frequently copy standard
More informationWhere Should I File My Lawsuit in California? bc-llp.com 1
WHERE SHOULD I FILE MY LAWSUIT IN CALIFORNIA? If you are filing a lawsuit against someone for a breach of contract, an injury, or any other type of wrong that you have suffered, it is important that you
More informationWho Pays for Delay? How Enforceable is a No Damage for Delay Clause?
Who Pays for Delay? How Enforceable is a No Damage for Delay Clause? Eugene Polyak Associate Fort Lauderdale, Florida T: 954.769.5335 E: gpolyak@smithcurrie.com Delays are an all too common occurrence
More informationAn Overview of Civil Litigation in the U.S. presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014
presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014 General Explanation of Civil Litigation in the U.S. U.S. litigation is governed by + + Rules of Civil Procedure; and + + Rules of Evidence. Rules of Civil Procedure:
More informationNevada Supreme Court Declares Pay-If-Paid Clauses Unenforceable Or Did It?
Nevada Supreme Court Declares Pay-If-Paid Clauses Unenforceable Or Did It? by Greg Gledhill, Associate For decades, pay-if-paid and/or pay-when-paid clauses have appeared in typical construction subcontracts.
More informationJohn R. Prairie. Overview of the Clause FAR is relatively straightforward. The text is as follows: By John R. Prairie & Tyler E.
But It s Only Six Months: Recent Decisions Provide Conflicting Guidance About When Agencies Can Use FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, to Deal With Budget Uncertainty During Sequestration By John
More informationTHE CONTRACT FORMATION PROCESS THE PRESENTER INTRODUCTION TOPICS CONTRACT LAW: ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR NON-LAWYERS HYATT HOTEL CANBERRA 18 JUNE 2014
THE CONTRACT FORMATION PROCESS CONTRACT LAW: ESSENTIAL SKILLS FOR NON-LAWYERS HYATT HOTEL CANBERRA 18 JUNE 2014 THE PRESENTER Sean King is a Director at Proximity, a leading provider of legal and procurement
More informationWHAT HAPPENED TO MY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT? DRAFTING, ENFORCING AND LITIGATING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS. Presented by
WHAT HAPPENED TO MY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT? DRAFTING, ENFORCING AND LITIGATING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS Presented by TED P. PEARCE Vice President and General Counsel Driven Brands, Inc. Charlotte, NC SANDY
More informationBell Prods. v. Hosp. Bldg. & Equip. Co.
No Shepard s Signal As of: January 26, 2017 12:14 PM EST Bell Prods. v. Hosp. Bldg. & Equip. Co. United States District Court for the Northern District of California January 23, 2017, Decided; January
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1331 CARLA CALOBRISI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., Defendant - Appellee. ------------------------ AARP,
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION COMPENDIUM OF LAW Tamara B. Goorevitz Franklin & Prokopik, P.C. 2 North Charles Street Suite 600 Baltimore, MD 21201 Tel: (410) 230 3625 Email: tgoorevitz@fandpnet.com
More informationCONSTRUCTION LAW. K. Brett Marston * J. Barrett Lucy **
CONSTRUCTION LAW K. Brett Marston * J. Barrett Lucy ** Since the last survey of this topic published in the fall of 2000, construction law in Virginia has continued to evolve in an array of areas involving
More informationMajority Opinion > UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Majority Opinion > Pagination * BL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ASPIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS LLC; ECC INTERNATIONAL
More informationInterstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 30 West Gude Dr., Suite 450 Rockville, MD
Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 30 West Gude Dr., Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 301-984-1908 www.potomacriver.org Request for Proposal A Review of the Potomac River Low Flow Allocation
More informationmew Doc 354 Filed 08/19/16 Entered 08/19/16 10:23:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 15
Pg 1 of 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x In re: HHH Choices Health Plan, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors. - -
More informationIn the United States Court of Federal Claims
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-376C (Filed: February 16, 2016) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PIONEER RESERVE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Clean Water Act; mitigation
More informationSCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ( Scott County CDA ) SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BOND COUNSEL. Issued: June 2, 2017
SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ( Scott County CDA ) SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BOND COUNSEL Issued: June 2, 2017 Proposals Due: Thursday, June 22, 2017 SCOTT COUNTY CDA, Shakopee,
More informationKelly. Kelly Brechtel Becker
Kelly Kelly Brechtel Becker Shareholder, New Orleans D 504.556.4067 kbbecker@liskow.com Hancock Whitney Center 701 Poydras Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70139 Overview Kelly Becker is a litigator whose
More informationTEAMING AGREEMENT 1.0 PROPOSAL ACTIVITIES
TEAMING AGREEMENT This teaming agreement (this Agreement ), by and between COMPANY, Inc. (hereinafter INC ) and SETECS, Inc. (hereinafter SETECS ) (each, a Party and collectively, the Parties ), is effective
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit K-CON, INC., Appellant v. SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee 2017-2254 Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in Nos. 60686, 60687,
More informationPayment Clauses for Subcontractors Vary with States
Payment Clauses for Subcontractors Vary with States Juan A. Franco JD, MSCM and Khalid Siddiqi PHD Kennesaw State University Marietta, Georgia The objective of this study was to identify the contingent
More informationmew Doc 2184 Filed 01/19/18 Entered 01/19/18 13:54:34 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ x In re : Chapter 11 : WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY : Case No. 17-10751
More informationAPPENDIX G MODEL FORM OF SMALL DIVERSE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT RECITALS
APPENDIX G MODEL FORM OF SMALL DIVERSE AND SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT This Subcontractor Agreement ("Subcontract") is made effective as of, 20, by and between, ("Contractor") and, a Small Diverse
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2005 WILLIAM LANGFORD, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D04-1937 PARAVANT, INC., Appellee. / Opinion filed August 5, 2005 Appeal
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Dated: 9/11/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE IN RE: CASE NO. 313-07358 BRYAN LEE TACKETT, JUDGE MARIAN F. HARRISON Debtor. ROBERT H. WALDSCHMIDT, ADV. NO.
More information7501 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 700W Bethesda, MD Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Erek L. Barron Partner 7501 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 700W Bethesda, MD 20814-6521 Phone: 301.804.3613 Fax: 301.804.3643 Email: ebarron@wtplaw.com 1800 M Street, NW Suite
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- Long Wave, Inc. Under Contract No. N00604-13-C-3002 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 61483 Stephen D. Knight, Esq. Sean K. Griffin, Esq. Smith
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
N THE CRCUT COURT FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND EATON PLACE ASSOCATES, LLC, c/o The Scott Group, nc. HON. Washington Street, Suite 300 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Plaintiff, V. Case No. NOVA WOMEN'S HEALTH
More informationUNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KENNETH A. COLE CAPTAIN
More informationOrganizational Conflicts of Interest and Post Government Employment Restrictions
888 17 th Street, NW, 11 th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 857-1000 Fax: (202) 857-0200 Organizational Conflicts of Interest and Post Government Employment Restrictions In Partnership with A PilieroMazza
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. WEST PALM BEACH HOTEL, LLC v. ATLANTA UNDERGROUND, LLC, Appellant. No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT WEST PALM BEACH HOTEL, LLC v. ATLANTA UNDERGROUND, LLC, Appellant No. 14-4113 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 626 Fed. Appx. 37; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14283 June
More informationCase 1:15-cv FPG Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:15-cv-00887-FPG Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : -v- : 15-CV- : LEE STROCK, KENNETH
More informationDispute Resolution Briefing
Dispute Resolution Briefing August 2014 Contents How enforceable is an obligation to negotiate? Introduction 01 The issue 01 The background facts 02 The decision 03 Conclusion 04 Contacts 05 Introduction
More informationUNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No Plaintiffs - Appellees,
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1098 ROBERT DONNERT; DAVID DONNERT, and TIFFANY HARTMANN, v. Plaintiffs - Appellees, Plaintiff, FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., d/b/a
More informationWilliam G. Kanellis, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for Defendant.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 07-532C Filed: July 7, 2008 TO BE PUBLISHED AXIOM RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, Bid Protest; Injunction; v. Notice Of Appeal As Of Right, Fed. R.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ASH EQUIPMENT CO., INC. D/B/A AMERICAN HYDRO; AND ASH EQUIPMENT CO., INC., A
More informationStephen Orlofsky leads the Firm s appellate practice and is the administrative partner of Blank Rome s Princeton, New Jersey, office.
Stephen M. Orlofsky Partner Business Litigation 300 Carnegie Center Princeton, NJ 08540 +1.609.750.2646 orlofsky@ Stephen Orlofsky leads the Firm s appellate practice and is the administrative partner
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Korte-Fusco Joint Venture ) ) Under Contract No. W912QR-11-C-0037 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59767
More informationIntellectual Ventures Wins Summary Judgment to Defeat Capital One s Antitrust Counterclaims
Intellectual Ventures Wins Summary Judgment to Defeat Capital One s Antitrust Counterclaims News from the State Bar of California Antitrust, UCL and Privacy Section From the January 2018 E-Brief David
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON FILED THE TIPTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION BY TIPTON COUNTY BOARD OF April 7, 1998 EDUCATION, Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 29, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 29, 202 Session ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. GARY ROSE, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A AMERICAN MASONRY AND CAPITAL BUILDERS, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court
More informationAdmissibility of Statements under Illinois Rule of Evidence 408: Control Solutions, LLC v. Elecsys
Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel Springfield, Illinois www.iadtc.org 800-232-0169 IDC Quarterly Volume 24, Number 4 (24.4.21) Evidence and Practice Tips Joseph G. Feehan and Brad W. Keller
More informationPresented by Richard Zielinski
Advance Conflict Waivers: Look Before You Leap Presented by Richard Zielinski April 9, 2009 1. What is an Advance Conflict Waiver? (a) A waiver given by a client (b) To a potential future representation
More informationDES MOINES AIRPORT AUTHORITY TITLE VI PLAN. Phone: (515) Phone: (515)
DES MOINES AIRPORT AUTHORITY TITLE VI PLAN Name and title of chief administrative officer Name: Kevin Foley Title: Executive Director Address: 5800 Fleur Drive, Suite 207 County: Polk Des Moines, Iowa
More informationFifth Circuit Rejects Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraudulent Transfer Claims
Fifth Circuit Rejects Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraudulent Transfer Claims By Michael L. Cook * The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected a trustee s breach of fiduciary claims against
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) Weis Builders, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. DACA45-03-D-0006 )
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Weis Builders, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 56306 ) Under Contract No. DACA45-03-D-0006 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Leonard
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W912EE-10-C-0019 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 58245 Louis H. Watson,
More informationWilliam F. Allen. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 815 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 main: (202) 842-3400 direct: (202) 772-2538 fax: (202) 842-0011 ballen@littler.com Focus Areas Class Actions Wage and Hour Litigation
More informationBruce M. Sabados. Partner Madison Avenue New York, NY Practices. Industries.
Bruce M. Sabados Partner +1.212.940.6369 bruce.sabados@kattenlaw.com 575 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10022-2585 Practices FOCUS: and Dispute Resolution Securities and Enforcement Appellate and Supreme
More informationCont Casualty Co v. Fleming Steel Co
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-25-2011 Cont Casualty Co v. Fleming Steel Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-4524
More informationMAINE MECHANIC S LIEN LAW
MAINE MECHANIC S LIEN LAW 2018-2019 Go to: Maine Mechanic s Lien Forms More Info: www.nationallienlaw.com Section Contents Pre-lien Notice(s) Name of Notice Who Must Use This Notice When How to Serve Verified
More information